Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
472248823
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Engloyers L Now Descumation
Dty 1994
CC HAROLD
- gement
PAT 6.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
JOHN
July 13, 1994
94 JUL 13 P5: 24
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
JK
FROM:
JOEL KLEIN
DEPUTY COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT
SUBJECT:
EMPLOYMENT AND NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1994
As you know, Senator Kennedy -- with over 130 cosponsors --
recently introduced the Employment and Non-Discrimination Act of
1994 (S. 2238). The Act addresses employment discrimination
based on sexual orientation.
You have consistently expressed support for the principle
that it should be illegal to discriminate in the workplace on the
basis of sexual orientation. You reiterated your support for
this principle in a statement you issued after Senator Kennedy
introduced the Employment and Non-Discrimination Act. Such
antidiscrimination protection is not novel: 8 states and over 80
local governments currently provide some form of protection
against sexual orientation discrimination, and federal civil
service law also already provides some protection in federal
civilian employment.
At the same time, we believe that it would be premature to
express support for the particular Act now under consideration by
Congress. Further discussion and Congressional debate is needed
to ensure that any bill ultimately adopted by Congress is
narrowly tailored and designed to maximize public and business
support for antidiscrimination efforts.
Senator Kennedy has asked Deval Patrick, head of the Civil
Rights Division at Justice, to testify before the Labor Committee
in support of the proposed Employment and Non-Discrimination Act.
In discussing this request with George Stephanopoulos, Phil Lader
and Alexis Herman, it was the consensus view that we should (1)
ask Deval only to submit a brief written statement to the
Committee that sets forth the Administration's support for the
principle that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
should be prohibited in the workplace, and (2) that we should
await further discussion and review before expressing support for
any particular legislation in this area.
We recognize that Senator Kennedy, certain Justice
Department staff and gay and lesbian rights groups may criticize
this approach. We feel, however, that, on balance, this approach
makes the most sense both substantively and politically.