Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 61
READ American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations EXECUTIVE COUNCIL AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR 815 Sixteenth Street, N.W. JOHN J. SWEENEY RICHARD L. TRUMKA LINDA CHAVEZ-THOMPSON Washington, D.C 20006 PRESIDENT SECRETARY-TREASURER EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT (202) 637-5000 Edward T. Hanley Vincent R. Sombrotto Gerald W. McEntee John T. Joyce & AFL CIO Morton Bahr Robert A. Georgine Gene Upshaw Jay Mazur Lenore Miller CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL John J. Barry Moe Biller Frank Hanley James J. Norton Michael Sacco Ron Carey Arthur A. Coia Frank Hurt Gloria T. Johnson Douglas H. Dority George F. Becker Stephen P. Yokich J. Randolph Babbitt Clayola Brown M.A. "Mac" Fleming Carolyn Forrest Pat Friend Michael Goodwin Joe L. Greene Sonny Hall Sumi Haru Carroll Haynes James LaSala William Lucy Leon Lynch Douglas J. McCarron A.L. "Mike" Monroe Arthur Moore Arturo S. Rodriguez Robert A. Scardelletti Robert E. Wages Jake West Alfred K. Whitehead Andrew L. Stern Edward L. Fire Martin J. Maddaloni John M. Bowers Sandra Feldman R. Thomas Buffenbarger Boyd D. Young Dennis Rivera March 30, 1998 Dr. Janet Yellen, Chair Council of Economic Advisers 17th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 314 Washington, DC 20502 Dear Dr. Yellen, As you know from our early meetings on climate change, the AFL-CIO has been concerned for some time about how the Administration's plan to tackle this problem is developing. We have said in many fora that we support a program that will: (1) assure global environmental repair, by requiring firm commitments from every member of the world community; (2) provide no perverse incentives, but rather provide incentives and mechanisms that reduce pollution here and create higher global standards both environmentally and economically; and (3) explicitly protect against economic upheaval and loss to U.S. workers. On first read, the plan you outlined in your testimony before the Commerce Committee on March 4 appears to address several important concerns. I want to thank you for being forthright in your presentation and for providing needed insight into the Administration's thinking on this difficult topic. We appreciate having additional information to consider, as well as a more clearly developed picture to react to. On closer examination, we believe that there are problems with the analysis you presented. In short, your testimony constructs a rosy, low-cost scenario, based upon a series of optimistic - and frequently, poorly substantiated - assumptions about electricity deregulation, an international emissions permit trading regime linked to joint implementation agreements and Clean 1