Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
286240421
label
Commencement 6/5/98 [MIT, Cambridge, MA]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
286240421
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
7431956-20060467F-003-002-2014
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
650d5cda43233af1
ocrText
FOIA Number: 2006-0467-F FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff. Collection/Record Group: Clinton Presidential Records Subgroup/Office of Origin: Speechwriting Series/Staff Member: Jeff Shesol Subseries: OA/ID Number: 18672 FolderID: Folder Title: Commencement 6/5/98 [MIT Cambridge, MA] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: S 91 6 8 1 Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001. note Handwritten. (1 page) 04/1998 P5 002: note Handwritten. Commencement. (8 pages) 04/1998 P5 003. note Handwritten. Format Unclear. (1 page) 04/1998 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Speechwriting Jeff Shesol OA/Box Number: 18672 FOLDER TITLE: Commencement 6/5/98 [MIT, Cambridge, MA] 2006-0467-F vz1276 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Yadda Yucks for Gore Commencement Speech Sheds Woodenness in Exploiting 'Seinfeld' By BLAINE HARDEN is under some pressure before his erated earlier in the ceremony when Washington Post Staff Writer anticipated 2000 presidential run to celebrated filmmaker, NYU graduate neutralize his reputation for being and "loyal Knicks fan" Shelton Jack- NEW YORK, May 14-Intent on wooden. son "Spike" Lee was awarded an proving he is not a graduate of the No less than 25 percent of Gore's honorary doctorate. lumber yard school of public speak- speech, his second commencement The substance of the vice presi- ing, Vice President Gore went for address in the past week, was devot- dent's speech concerned high-tech Seinfeldian yucks before substance in ed to rim-shot zingers, many of them issues that he has come to be identi- a commencement speech today at fied with-a call to protect consumer Vice President Gore FRIDAY, MAY 15, 1998 The Washington Post tied to tonight's broadcast of the final New York University. episode of "Seinfeld." privacy from computerized invasion. and movie director "After today, many of you will Finding heretofore unseen similar- Gore outlined what he called "an Spike Lee consult ities between members of the NYU have to go out and find jobs. Just like electronic bill of rights for the infor- before graduation the cast of "Seinfeld," said Gore, who community and the cast of the top- mation age," the details of which ceremonies at New rated TV sitcom, Gore singled out were made available on Wednesday York University, four students and faculty who share and which were published today. in where the vice surnames with characters in the many newspapers. president delivered CORRECTIONS show-Kramer at the law school, In summary, Gore called for legis- commendement Costanza at the credit union, Seinfeld lation to restrict electronic access to address and Lee The play "Exile in Jerusalem" runs at the school of social work and private medical records, announced received an through May 24 at Theater J. A Newman, a graduating senior at the the creation of a government Web review in Wednesday's editions car- school of the arts-and wished each honorary degree. site that allows people to prevent ried the wrong closing date. of them adieu. their personal data from being passed The vice president saved Newman on by companies and said the Com- BY CLARK for last. In the same sneering, hateful merce Department would convene a An article in Sunday's Arts section tone that Jerry Seinfeld uses in the summit in June on consumer privacy. of delivering a commencement speakers, he was told, should think of tion as the "Cast Iron Man." gave incomplete information about show when addressing his slothful As the vice president soldiered speech that turns out to be a snoozer. themselves as the body at an old- "Could you imagine having a repu- admission charges at the Phillips postman nemesis, Gore curled his lip through the substantive portions of Quoting Vice President Thomas fashioned Irish wake. They need you Collection. The gallery charges ad- and barked: "Goodbye tation of being SO STIFF they called NEW- his speech he seemed to slip back R. Marshall, who served under in order to have the party-but MAN!". you the Cast Iron Man'? I really don't mission fees on weekends: $6.50 for into his often-criticized rhetorical Woodrow Wilson, Gore said, "The nobody expects you to say very know how he went on." general admission; $3.25 for seniors Judging by the laughter of 8,000 style, a painfully deliberate manner of vice president of the United States is much." and full-time students. It does not purple-robed graduates and their But Gore did go in that same vein speaking that is similar to the pedan- like a man in a cataleptic state: He Gore, who has for some time been families spread across Manhattan's tic "Special English". short-wave for another five jokes before shifting charge a fee during daytime hours cannot speak; he cannot move; he trying to inoculate himself against Washington Square Park on a splen- broadcasts the Voice of America to his vision for the 21st century and Tuesday through Friday, but asks for suffers no pain; and yet he is perfectly wooden-politician jibes, jabbed an did sun-dappled morning, the vice the problems of privacy in the infor- beams to Third World countries. a contribution of $6.50 for general conscious of everything that goes on ironic needle into his own vice presi- mation age. president proved that, at the very Oddly, in the joke-filled first quar- around him. admission and $3.25 for seniors. The dential flesh. least, reports of his soporific speech- The vice president's rhetorical gallery charges a $5 admission fee ter of his speech, Gore's comic timing "Which brings me back to my role He mentioned that in his reading making are somewhat exaggerated. transition between silly and sub- was superb as he made wicked fun of from 5 to 8:30 p.m. on Thursdays, for at this commencement. Your great on the history of the vice presidency, As enthusiastic as the response stance was, as befits the momentous- the legendary meaninglessness of the those 19 and older. Members and former governor, Mario Cuomo, he learned that Vice President John was to the jokey part of his speech, ness of the day, Seinfeld-like. vice presidency, of the stodginess of those under 18 are admitted free at once recalled the advice he was given C. Calhoun, who served under John Gore came nowhere near matching the men who have held the office "Or to put in another way: yadda, all times. the first time he was asked to speak Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, the standing-ovation electricity gen- (including himself) and of the danger yadda, yadda," the vice president at a graduation. Commencement had earned a public-speaking reputa- said. Berliners, U.S. Veterans Cheer BERLIN, From A29 Kenneth Herman was one of the candy dropped from Allied planes, American veterans on hand for the math of World War II. told the audience that the Allied A Shared '48 Airlift to History events today. He was 25 when the As Clinton put it today, "West- airlift began and over the next 15 planes were bringing not only sup- ern Allies became protectors, in- plies but also "the hope of free- months flew 190 sorties. "We stead of occupiers, of Germany." dom" to the residents of Berlin. By DAN BALZ and one of the most audacious exam- knew we were tasked to keep the Clinton and Kohl were joined by ples of air power ever seen. Russians from forcing the Allies Both Clinton and Kohl used the II ashington Post Staff Writer some of the veterans of the airlift out of Berlin," he said. "We were memories of the airlift to encour- If it was a month short of the real and by thousands of Berliners who BERLIN, May 14-Gail Halvorsen 50th anniversary, no one seemed to not about to allow a repression- age the same kind of resolve and cheered the contribution of the was a young pilot when the United mind. President Clinton joined Ger- type government such as the Com- determination in the reshaping of States and other Allies launched the American pilots and their own man Chancellor Helmut Kohl at Ber- munists take over all of Berlin." Europe in the wake of the Cold Berlin Airlift in the summer of 1948 to spirit of determination to survive. Halvorsen, whom Clinton mis- War. "I hope both Americans and lin's Tempelhof Airport to praise both break a Soviet blockade of the city. "I the courage of crews that kept the city Clinton called Tempelhof Air- takenly referred to as "she" in his Germans will always remember thought it would be over in a few port "the first battlefield of the alive and the spirit of the people in speech, talked about the scariest the lesson of what happened here weeks," he said. Berlin in the face of Soviet aggression. Cold War." On the tarmac was a moment of his airlift experience, 50 years ago," Clinton said. "We Instead of a few weeks, the block- The cooperation between the Allied little C-54 cargo plane that West- the day in August 1948 when air cannot relinquish the responsibili- ade lasted 11 months, and the airlift military forces and the people of ern pilots used to ferry flour and traffic controllers in Berlin lost ties of leadership, for the struggle continued for 15. During that time, Berlin made the city a symbol of coal, food and medicine, into Ber- control of the planes supplying the for freedom never ends." Allied airplanes flew more than resistance to Soviet expansionism and lin around the clock for those 15 city. Halvorsen was at 10,000 feet Later, Clinton and Kohl left Ber- 278,000 sorties into Berlin. Halvorsen a beacon of freedom around the world. months, landing every 90 seconds when suddenly another plane ap- lin for Eisenach, a small city in the flew 190 of those himself and was back The airlift also helped transform Ger- at the operation's peak. Hovering peared at the same altitude. "We former East Germany that was in Berlin today to commemorate the man-American relations in the after- over the C-54 was a huge, modern came head on," he said. "We just 50th anniversary of one of the boldest C-17 cargo plane, christened by once home to both-Johann Sebas- missed by a few feet." Clinton and Kohl as "The Spirit of tian Bach and Martin Luther but chapters in U.S. and European history See BERLIN, A34, Col. I Mercedes Wild, who at the time Berlin." which is now in an area of Germa- was a little girl longing to receive ny suffering economically. The Washington Post FRIDAY, MAY 15, 1998 Michael Waldman 04/30/98 09:15:04 AM Record Type: Record To: Lowell A. Weiss/WHO/EOP, Jeffrey A. Shesol/WHO/EOP cc: Subject: fyi I'm checking w/ Podesta what & how to deal with this mw White House To Release Web Plan ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Clinton administration's final plan to turn over management of the Internet to an international non-profit group will likely be released within the next two weeks, the White House official in charge of the project said Wednesday. The plan will radically change how the burgeoning Internet is organized and effectively end the U.S. government's role as a data traffic cop. At best, the changes would be virtually transparent to users. At worst, they could result in chaos and raise serious questions about the stability of the Internet, which has become a vital conduit for information and commerce. Ira Magaziner, the White House senior policy adviser responsible for the changeover, told an Internet conference in New York on Wednesday he expects the final proposal to be finished within two weeks. But he's also told industry insiders recently the paper may be completed as early as next week. A deadline looms. The government's contract with Network Solutions Inc., the Herndon, Va.-based company that currently assigns addresses on the World Wide Web, expired March 31 and was extended six months, until the end of September. But there are no provisions for another contract extension. "At that point, things have got to be clear, up and functioning, or it could be a little questionable about what happens," said Don Heath, president of the Internet Society, who met with Magaziner earlier this week. Heath said he expects the administration will immediately suggest three new Web address suffixes, called domains. Current domains include .com, .net and .org. The administration hasn't described what new domains it might suggest, but proposals have included .firm, .web, .arts., .nom, .rec, .info and .store. The now suffixes would greatly expand the Web's current 1.6 million estimated addresses. Critics contend that the landslide of possible new site names could make it even more difficult to find information on the Internet and create headaches for companies trying to protect their trademarks. But Supporters argue that the new domains could help organize the Web, which can be chaotic for newcomers. The administration released a draft of its plan in January, then asked for public comment before rewriting it. More than 430 people and organizations responded. Heath said the administration has heeded criticisms from overseas that, even under the new plan, the Internet would still be too U.S.-centric, largely because the yet-to-be-formed international non-profit group would be based in the United States. "A lot of the decisions for the future will come out of this," Heath said. "That's appropriate for the new Internet. It puts it out the hands of the U.S. government and in the hands of the Internet's self-governing mechanism." "I anticipate (Magaziner) has heard the international community loud and clear," he added. In reviewing the public comments, the administration noted the "principle of globalism received strong support" and said many people wrote that "the Internet has grown from its U.S. roots into a global medium." Earlier this year, Network Solutions announced that Internet address registrations outside the United States represented about one-fourth of website name requests. Printable text version of this story Las Vegas SUN main page Questions or problems? Click here. Read our policy on cookies and privacy. Click here. All contents copyright 1998 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. Nevada's largest website THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Greenspan speech (Rames) Information Economy Goals/challenges Inequality Privacy Competition Community / social cohesion Political participation Civic discourse civil socty citizenship/ Econ. Soc. Pol. Competition Inequality activism participation productivity privacy Skins/try. concentration community discoune citizenship transparency Disruption break up old patterns new ones - maling change ourfriend THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Inequality /opportunity - only Peun. tested proposals a)- computer every classron. Ed rept b) teacher trg. in computers c) req. computer class as condition of grad - polled well - but what does this mean? Class issue mid-class -want job at Digital upper. class - read shakespeare Focused approach to max. potential on upward mobility + min. inequality THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Opportunity -dizabilities access -Distance learning = Shills - trg. - schools How town infotech to empower those who today are held back by physical distance or disability or the culture of poverty! 1 Policy areas Killa apps (alcess) equity community service - Stand 1) Decrocration equity-access of Internet 2) Democratization by Internet (values) Pub/pris. partnerships aftercomplete pd. of trans. - whereas nation - one policy in each ? information Americans - Techcorps? technology coin a term ? - credits toward college - certificate Access - to handware - content -to shills -trg. - hands-on (ie, Smith online) sonian Tech Corps Democracy - After.school computer project vote smart - issues info. Community Tech centers Smithsonian online Internet as means to engagement in arena every book, even symptions, every ptg. sociological impact Values - citizenship - commercializ. - stimulus to community activism service - natil database of service opp. ie. DC Cares - enlist nahoo but us means to end web not as end in itself - political activism ie., Tom/Merc. - -transparency; activism Read some bigthing pieces - -Drucker - Negroponte MEMORANDUM Monday, April 20, 1998 TO Michael Waldman Lowell Weiss FROM Jeff Shesol RE: Nicholas Negroponte Being Digital Nicholas Negroponte is Professor of Media Technology at MIT and Founding Director of the MIT Media Lab. His book, published in 1995, is already a bit of an anachronism and is filled with the sort of loopy utopianism that characterizes writing of this sort. Being Digital is highly effective as a primer on the technology itself, but will be of limited use in writing a "Big Picture" speech. Perhaps predictably he is something of a libertarian, reflexively hostile to government, regarding it as little more than meddlesome. Still, Negroponte makes a point or two worth considering: It was Thomas Jefferson who advanced the concept of lending libraries, though he "never considered the likelihood that 20 million people might access a digital library electronically and withdraw its contents at no cost." (4) Seen in this context, a Universal Digital Library could be posited as the fulfilment of Jefferson's legacy. "Computing is not about computers any more. It is about living." (6) Accordingly, there's little news in a commencement speech about the wonders of computer technology, about neat stuff that your 21st toaster will be able to do. Far more interesting, and far more befitting a President, is a speech that tells us something fundamental about the impact of that technology on the shape of our society and our lives, as well as our sense of ourselves as a nation. Negroponte envisions a world in which geographical boundaries and artificial constructs like "nation-states" have simply dissolved. Michael Waldman 04/16/98 04:35:59 PM Record Type: Record To: Jeffrey A. Shesol/WHO/EOP, Lowell A. Weiss/WHO/EOP CC: Subject: The Web That Knew Too Much: FTC Seeks New Ways to Protect Users' Privacy 10.00 a.m. ET (1400 GMT) April 16, 1998 By Amanda Onion, Fox News Consider this: A video camera tracks your every move as you stroll through a mall. It sees you leafing through new releases in a bookstore, buying a new pair of cargo shorts and breezing through the jazz section of a music store. The next time you visit the mall, store clerks, armed with footage from that spy camera, beckon you to buy new fiction, travel wear and John Coltrane collections. Too close for comfort? That's everyday practice on the Web. A Business Week/Lou Harris poll reported last month that privacy has become the primary worry of would-be Web users. Compiling information about users by monitoring which sites they visit, where they make online purchases and what news they like to read is the latest way the industry has begun to generate angst. The Federal Trade Commission, concerned that privacy issues are slowing e-commerce, has begun a three-month-long survey of the 1,200 top Web sites to analyze how invasive their data-gathering practices are. Their aim is to learn whether self-regulation has worked to protect privacy and, depending on what they learn, to recommend that Congress either pass or drop the 32 pending pieces of legislation designed to control privacy on the Web. The FTC will report its findings in July. One of the main items the FTC is now looking for is privacy policy statements that inform readers what information is being selected from them, how it is used and whether it is secure. "I think a lot of companies don't have any idea who has access to information, what's being done with it and who it's being shared with," said Susan Scott, executive director for TRUSTe, a nonprofit organization that promotes privacy policies among Web companies, helping them draft rules and then monitoring sites to make sure they abide by their own guidelines. "There's nothing wrong with gathering information," clarified David Medine, associate director at the Bureau of Consumer Protection for the FTC, "as long as you give the consumer some notice and choice about it." The problem is, posting privacy policies hasn't exactly caught on. Only slightly more than 100 companies have signed on and adopted the TRUSTe seal. The fact that a handful of fairly large Web sites have invited TRUSTe's auditing - including Excite, C-Net and Land's End - suggests that more could follow. But the list of online companies offering privacy policies still represents a minuscule portion of the nearly 30 million sites now making up the vast, nebulous world of the Web. What's more, privacy policies may inform the user, but they usually can do little to stop a site from culling personal data. One of the most common ways sites collect data from a reader is through what the tech world calls "cookies." As Scott says, "Any time you try and explain a cookie, it starts getting really creepy." Cookies are small data files planted in a new visitor's hard drive. Whenever a user returns to that site, the host's server can read the data from the cookie. Even if a Web site explains how they may use information, by the time a "Netizen" clicks on the privacy policy, a cookie may already be planted in her computer. The easiest way to block cookies is by turning off the cookie mechanism in a browser (under "preferences"), but many users don't realize this option exists. The way Web hosts use cookies is, for the most part, completely benign and even beneficial. For example, Fox News Online uses software called Net Gravity, which employs cookies to ensure readers don't see the same ads too many times. The mechanism also helps readers remember where they've been on the site by changing the color of links they've already clicked on. Some, however, take the technology a step further. Advertising programs like Double Click and Adfinity use cookies to amass detailed profiles of Netizens by monitoring where they surf. These profiles are then offered to companies interested in pitching ads to certain target consumers. "Clicking on a link can be very revealing," said Deirdre Mulligan, staff counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology. "It can reveal the intimate likes and dislikes of a user." Personal data, like age, gender or address, can also be collected when a person registers at a Web site, like The New York Times. Hosts usually use this kind of culling to help cater the site to each reader's interests. TV Guide Entertainment Network, for example, asks readers for their zip codes so that each time they visit the site, their personal local television listings automatically appear. There may be nothing wrong with catered advertising, or personalizing a Web site to the user, but some fear that a single piece of information about readers, like the fact that they frequent sites about AIDS or tobacco, could prove harmful if it managed to land in the wrong hands - like an insurance company. "The Web is a vague place," said Mulligan. "You never know exactly who is on the receiving end." But others believe this kind of fear amounts to nothing but undue paranoia. Fred Cate, a law professor at Indiana University School of Law, has argued before Congress against Federal regulation. He contends that people simply need to be aware that the Web is not private terrain. "The same way communication is not private elsewhere in society, there's no promise of confidentiality on the Web," he said. Leave the Web alone, Cate argues, and industry will find its own solutions. So far industry's most promising solution lies in privacy platform, or "passport," technology. This software would permit users to control exactly how private their Web experience will be. Using a browser equipped with this technology, a user could, for example, choose not to visit sites that employ cookies. Last week, Microsoft bought Firefly, one of the leading companies specializing in passport technology. Speed is a key issue for both government and industry in the effort to improve privacy on the Web. Multinational businesses are anxiously counting the days until October, when a new policy from Europe takes effect. The European Directive calls for an end to Web communication to any site beyond the EU that shows "inadequate" privacy protection. The policy could prove crippling to U.S. businesses in Europe that depend on electronic communication to transfer data to home branches in the U.S. "Companies are more concerned about doing business with Europe than they are about the Web right now," said Cate. "That's what's driving this in a lot of ways." © 1998, News America Digital Publishing, Inc. d/b/a Fox News Online. All rights reserved. Fox News is a registered trademark of 20th Century Fox Film Corp. commen Michael Waldman 04/20/98 08:57:04 AM Record Type: Record To: Jeffrey A. Shesol/WHO/EOP, Lowell A. Weiss/WHO/EOP CC: Subject: mit speech Forwarded by Michael Waldman/WHO/EOP on 04/20/98 08:58 AM Jeffrey M. Smith 04/20/98 08:24:35 AM Record Type: Record To: Michael Waldman/WHO/EOP, Thomas A. Kalil/OPD/EOP, Jim Kohlenberger/OVP @ OVP CC: Subject: mit speech Mike, Tom, Jim -- here are some thoughts -- FYI -- from Neal Lane on the MIT speech -- Jeff Smith Forwarded by Jeffrey M. Smith/OSTP/EOP on 04/20/98 08:22 AM Neal Lane <nlane @ nsf.gov > 04/18/98 08:13:32 PM Record Type: Record To: Jeffrey M. Smith/OSTP/EOP CC: Kerri A. Jones/OSTP/EOP, Holly L. Gwin/OSTP/EOP, nlane @ nsf.gov Subject: mit speech Jeff: I spoke with Tom Kalil yesterday. He mentioned the MIT speech. He said the debate was between a single theme, e.g., "universal digital library" and several, e.g. "must sustain the investment in computation and communication technology to assure benefits; must assure citizens receive the broader benefits to enhance their health, quality of life, etc.; must minimize the downside, e.g. address issues such as privacy, etc". I think I got this roughly right. I believe you have been in the meetings. (one of the big downsides is the possibility of widening the gap between 'haves' and 'havesnot' (see Jamie's suggestion below.) I think the 'information technology' theme is sufficently broad to enable delivery of several important messages. If indeed the speech focuses on infotech, it would be important to get a comment in about the interdependence of many areas of science and engineering, e.g. fiber optics communication came out of materials research. etc. -- the point being that you get breakthroughs in imprtant technologies like infotech and biotech by maintaining a strong research program in all important fields of science and engineering. It would also be important to acknowledge MIT's role in boosting the economy by turning out many of the brightest and most innovative scientists/engineers in the world. (recall, the MIT report on MIT's contribution to the GDP. Best wishes, Neal Idea (below) suggested by Jamie Rubin: "Dr. Lane: Another thought, inspired by today's newspaper. You may have noticed the report that came out in this month's Science mag. about African-American access (or lack thereof) to computers and the internet. This was an angle we worked quite successfully during the battle to implement the Schools and libraries Provision of the Telecom Act. There were some studies we were able to cite identifying racial and socioeconomic gaps in access to advanced telecommunications. Since the statistics on employment in the hard sciences reflect the same gaps, it isn't hard to make a credible argument that the two are related and will only get worse. I think there's a real opportunity for the Vice President to link technological and social goals here. So, a suggestion: invite the authors of the latest study to a public forum on the subject with the Veep, the current Chairman of the FCC (an African American, by the way), and others. I'm guessing Chairman kennard would be receptive." Web offers details on companies' pollution (4/15/1998) http://www.sjmercury.com/business/center/greenweb0416.htm X Title: T search Mercury Center San Jose Mercury News Home Site Index Search Feedback Help Customer Service Sections News Business & Stocks Business & Stocks Technology Posted at 11:08 p.m. PDT Wednesday, April 15, 1998 Sports transparence Opinion Web offers details on Living & Comics Weather companies' pollution Classifieds & Services BY PAUL ROGERS Jobs: Talent Scout Mercury News Staff Writer Homes: HomeHunter Cars: CarHunter In one of the most far-reaching marriages of computer Entertainment: Just Go technology and environmental activism yet, a Web site unveiled Wednesday allows anyone in the United States with Yellow Pages Internet access to locate polluting industries in their Mercury News Classifieds neighborhood, research the amount of chemicals being Archives: NewsLibrary released and learn the risk with a few clicks of a mouse. News agent: NewsHound The new site was assembled by the Oakland offices of the Related Features non-profit Environmental Defense Fund at a cost of more Business Home than $1 million and a year of work. With Oracle Corp. of Redwood Shores donating rights to use its software, the site Business Today combines more than 150 government and university Apple Watch databases onto a single location. Mercury News Business `The environmental movement has to get more creative with Breaking News our approaches," said Fred Krupp, executive director of the Computing Environmental Defense Fund, based in New York City. Getting Ahead We're trying to harness the information revolution and GMSV empower citizens. Microsoft Watch ``Sunshine is a powerful disinfectant." Asia Tech Update Money Tree If the first day of the Web site's operation is any indication, Mortgage Watch there is great interest in the pollution data. During its first five hours online, the site received 300,000 hits -- causing a HomeHunter temporary overload to the server. Stocks Talent Scout Statistics accessible Tax Guide '98 The new approach, which could lead to increased corporate Greg Carpluk accountability, demystifies the national statistics that reveal Dan Gillmor who's polluting and who's not. Adam Lashinsky Since 1988, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has Chris Nolan required all companies that emit pollutants into the air, water Cheryl Shavers and solid waste systems to submit annual reports totaling the 1 of 3 04/16/98 11:22:17 Web offers details on companies' pollution (4/15/1998) http://www.sjmercury.com/business/center/greenweb0416.htm. Cheryl Shavers amount and type of emissions. That list, which includes Contact Us 31,000 manufacturing plants and more than 700 chemicals, has been largely overlooked by the general public. About this page Fairly complex and esoteric, the list, called the Toxic Release Inventory, has been mostly studied by environmental groups, journalists, business interests and government regulators. The new Web site delivers the information in a more user-friendly package. For example, users can enter the name of any company in the United States and see whether it has released significant amounts of pollutants. They can call up maps showing where all major toxic polluters are in their towns, counties and states. They also can access rankings of the largest polluters by any region, and link to peer-reviewed studies spelling out the health risks of chemicals being released, and what type of government rules affect those chemicals. For major polluters, the user can click on a form letter that sends a free fax to the company's plant manager, informing the firm that the user is aware of the amount of pollution being put out and requesting that those levels be reduced. "For years, all this information has been sitting in EPA files," Krupp said. "It's very powerful. We hope this will help communities work with plant managers to further reduce emissions." Big industry, which at first fought the law that created the Toxic Release Inventory program, has dramatically reduced its pollution levels over the past decade. That's in part because of accountability: The public and government officials have been better able to rank the most serious polluters. ``It's clear that things are getting better. We are doing the right things," said Theresa Larson, director of environmental quality for the National Association of Manufacturers. Down since '88 Nationwide since 1988, for example, total toxic emissions have fallen 61 percent, from 5.6 billion pounds to 2.2 billion pounds. The numbers are even better in California, where total toxic emissions have dropped 64 percent. A quick search of the site shows that California ranks 19th among the states for most toxic emissions. Texas, Louisiana and Ohio top the list for most pollution put out. Vermont and Hawaii are at the bottom. Locally, Santa Clara County ranks eighth of California's 58 2 of 3 04/16/98 11:22:17 Web offers details on companies' pollution (4/15/1998) http://www.sjmercury.com/business/center/greenweb(4 10.htin counties for total pollution reported under the law. Los Angeles reported the largest amounts. Alameda County was fifth, Santa Cruz County 29th and San Mateo County 32nd, in 1995, the most recent year for which EPA has data. The new Web site is almost certain to put more pressure on industry to reduce pollution levels further. Larson said that although most big companies have not studied the new Web site, they might be concerned -- as they have in the past -- that the public could misinterpret the data. Many types of garbage or air emissions pose little or no health risks, she noted, while others can pose serious threats, depending on the type of chemical. "We don't want people to be needlessly alarmed," she said. ``More doesn't necessarily mean more risk. There are high volumes of things with low toxicity." The Web site was assembled by a team of 12 Environmental Defense Fund staff members, including physicians, computer programmers and toxicologists, under the direction of toxicologist William Pease, formerly with the University of California-Berkeley School of Public Health. Officials at Oracle gave the group a license -- worth $40,000 -- to use the high-octane software that helped create the site. Government officials were withholding judgment Wednesday. ``In general, we support any project that provides accurate environmental information to the public," said Lois Grunwald, a spokeswoman at the EPA regional office in San Francisco. "But it is premature," she said, ``for EPA to comment about this Web site until we've had time to take a close look at it and get a good sense of its scope and accuracy." The Environmental Defense Fund has 300,000 members, one-fifth of them in California. The group was founded in 1967 by a group of scientists and lawyers in Long Island, N.Y., working to ban DDT. Back to top San Jose Mercury News Home Site Index Search Feedback Help Customer Service Make the business connection with the Bay Area's best follow Pages ©1997 - 1998 Mercury Center. The information you receive online from Mercury Center is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright-protected material. 3 of 3 04/16/98 11:22:17 Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 001. note Handwritten. (1 page) 04/1998 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Speechwriting Jeff Shesol OA/Box Number: 18672 FOLDER TITLE: Commencement 6/5/98 [MIT, Cambridge, MA] 2006-0467-F vz1276 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRAJ b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRAJ b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. Michael Waldman 04/16/98 10:48:28 AM Record Type: Record To: Lowell A. Weiss/WHO/EOP, Jeffrey A. Shesol/WHO/EOP, Laura K. Capps/WHO/EOP, Arkadi M. Gerney/WHO/EOP CC: Subject: fyi re privacy Getting To Know Your Audience By Daniel Bennett © National Journal's Cloakroom Thursday, April 16, 1998 Cookies are the ultimate sales device. Not the kind of cookies that crumble, but rather the kind that compute. And whether you're a consumer surfing the Web or a politician pushing an issue, it's time to start thinking about what this can mean. Cookies came about when Netscape created a system for Web sites to deposit information on the client's computer, to be accessed the next time the site is visited. Simply put, this gives a Web browser a memory -- for passwords, your favorite news subjects, the number of chocolate chips you will order -- anything. This and similar technologies have revolutionized the possibilities of advertising, making the Web the ultimate marketing tool. Forget such recent innovations as Net ratings and data mining. Both depend on averages and are predictors of future behavior. Cookies allow real-time, individual measures of each and every user. Where, when and how often a person peruses web pages can be recorded and analyzed. (For a demonstration, go to the Center for Democracy and Technology.) Pair that with information on who the visitor is and the Web becomes the heaven of advertising -- privacy rules and policies notwithstanding. Commercial organizations are leading the way in developing and exploiting this brave new world, but politicians and their consultants will have to learn to operate in it. Simply creating a Web site or buying banner advertising on highly trafficked sites is not enough -- this is learning how to relate one-to-one with a potential audience of millions. Right now, companies like Yahoo! and Amazon Books are pioneering new methods of creating a one-to-one relationship with consumers. One-On-One For Everyone Advertising is no longer constrained to general ratings, but to actual real-time behavior. Searching for Web sites related to Florida? You should expect travel ads to pop up on the search engine. Want free e-mail? Hotmail will supply it for you - in exchange for a personal profile so you can be peppered with properly targeted advertising. "Surfing the Web" once meant sifting through disparate sites -- now Web sites can surf you, anticipating your every need and desire. It's as if ABC could monitor your use of the TV remote. Currently, political campaigns have trouble buying advertising that targets only voters in that state or district. In the not-so-distant future, Web ads will be tailored not only to the right ZIP codes, but focused to reach only individuals who meet certain criteria-and reach them when they are most receptive to a particular message. For example, a Republican candidate could buy ad space on a tax preparation Web site where the ad itself would vary based on the income level of the individual. Enter a high income while computing your returns, and the ad becomes a tax calculator that shows the savings a proposed tax cut would have. Enter a medium income, and the ad details how much the government spends per capita on the poor and elderly. Enter a low income and a PSA would remind them not to miss voting next Wednesday. All of this without actually gathering private information -- just reacting to it. This new technology could make even very targeted radio campaigns seem grossly imprecise. Online campaigns could use all the glitz of television, but not be scattershot and impersonal. Combine it with good poll data, and online politics could be as focused and finely tuned to the audience as an old-fashioned town meeting. Ads Are Only The Beginning It's not just campaigns, of course. Constituent services, issue polls, support for legislation -- all stand to benefit from smart, focused ads and Web pages that tailor themselves to the audience. And this is only the beginning. As more and more is done on the Web, from calculating tax returns to calling friends to watching movies, the Web will start to watch us. This all may seem like the telescreen in Orwell's 1984, but it is coming, and it may even make sense. Why sit through a haphazard blizzard of commercials -- regardless of whether they are for politics or Polident -- when you can see only what you might want or need? On the other hand, understand that people may rebel and demand anonymity. The trick -- regardless of whether you're a Hill staffer, campaign consultant or plain old private citizen -- is to strike that balance between privacy and personalization, utility and respect for the user. And while you're working on that, you might also want to wipe away those cookie crumbs on your cheek-no, the other side. About This Column: Written by Daniel Bennett and James M. Smith -- both of whom are campaign and Capitol Hill veterans -- Capitol Hypertext is a weekly look at the changes being wrought on the Hill by technology. It is intended to highlight innovations, opportunities and missteps on both sides of the aisle. mit.413 Page 1 April 13, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO MICHAEL WALDMAN FROM: GENE SPERLING ToM KALIL SUBJECT: MIT Speech I think that there are at least four exciting topics that the President could use in this commencement address that would advance his overall agenda and support many of his policies. 1) Science and Technology in the 21st Century--the President could make the case for his increased investments in biomedical research (NIH) and for investment in science and technology more broadly. Biomedical research has the potential to save lives and money through earlier detection and prevention of diseases, and is a legitimate use of the tobacco revenues. Biomedical research depends on advances in other areas -- (e.g. physics for CAT scans, computers for medical imaging) -- so it is important to make across-the-board investments in science and technology (e.g. National Science Foundation). 2) Protecting Privacy in the Information Age--The President could announce Administration initiatives to protect privacy - including (1) meaningful industry self-regulation; (2) establishing a focal point for privacy issues within the federal government; and (3) initiatives or legislation that are designed to target specific aspects of the privacy problem (e.g. medical records, kids, companies that develop "electronic dossiers" on millions of Americans). The President could also dicuss the need to explore the ethical, legal, and social dimensions of the Information Revolution in the same way that we have done as part of the Human Genome Project. 3) Diffusion/Benefits of Technology--The President could discuss the importance of the broad diffusion of technology throughout society. As Alan Greenspan has stated, economic growth and productivity increases come from the widespread adoption and diffusion of technology. Innovation is necessary but not sufficient. The president could also discuss specific benefits and applications of technology that will become possible as it becomes more widely available. 4) Equity-- New developments in technology can either bring society together or divide a society. The President could discuss the need to make Technology a priority by highlighting his Education Technology Initiative. He is committed to not only wiring every classroom and increasing the number of computers -- but ensuring mit.413 Page 2 that teachers can use technology effectively in the classroom. If only the rich have access to technology, it will further the divisions among race and class that already exist in American' society. This theme could amplify the President's Race Initiative. mitspee.wpd Page 1 April 13, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: RE: MIT COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS I. Summary: We think that your June 5th MIT address might be an opportunity to give a major policy address on the Information Revolution and its implications for all Americans. This speech would differ from your July 1997 address on the Internet and global electronic commerce because it would focus more on the social dimensions of the Information Revolution - and concrete steps that government, industry and academia can take to promote the benefits and applications of information technology that go beyond buying and selling on the Internet -- and address the problem of "information haves and have-nots." The theme would be "Putting People First in the Information Age." The speech would spell out a three-part agenda: - Continuing to invest in the long-term research and development that will sustain the Information Revolution. - Promoting applications of information technology that benefit real people, and help prevent America from being divided into information "haves" and "have-nots." - Take steps to address the potential downsides of the Information Revolution - such as an erosion of personal privacy, and create an initiative that would explore the ethical, legal, and social implications of the Information Revolution. Given the leadership role that the Vice President has played in these issues, we would want to work closely with him before presenting you with a final proposal. II. Why focus on the Information Revolution? mitspee.wpd Page 2 We believe that focusing on the Information Revolution is appropriate because of (1) the rapid pace of change of the technology; (2) the expanding utilization of information technology by more and more Americans; and (3) its pervasive impact on virtually all aspects of our economic and social life. For example: Our ability to store, process, and transmit information is continuing to improve at exponential rates. The semiconductor industry is already developing the technology that will allow them to put billions of transistors on a single integrated circuit. Fiber optics technology will eventually allow us to transmit all of the phone traffic on Mother's Day on a single strand of fiber. The Internet, which connected 2,000 computers in 1985, now connects 30 million computers, and is continuing to double in size every year. Forty-two percent of all households now have personal computers. Satellite and wireless systems will soon provide users with "anytime, anywhere" communication. III. What are some of the specific applications of information technology that can improve our quality of life? Your speech might discuss steps we can take to promote the use of information technology in ways that will improve the quality of life for all Americans. Some examples are: Life-long learning: A growing number of working Americans would like to upgrade their skills but find it difficult to participate in traditional campus-based instruction. By allowing adults to learn at a time, place and pace that is convenient for them -- distance learning can make it easier for them to upgrade their skills and compete for the jobs that the New Economy is creating. Empowering low income Americans: Many applications of information technology could empower low income Americans, including: Community Technology Centers that would make it easier for people without access to computers to acquire information technology skills. The President's Educational Technology Initiative is designed to ensure that all schools not just wealthy schools -- have access to computers, the Internet, and teachers that can use technology effectively in the classroom. mitspee.wpd Page 3 High-quality software for adult basic education (English as a Second Language, GED equivalence, adult literacy, remedial math) could help advance our Welfare-to-Work initiative. Public health networks that seek to increase childhood immunization rates in our inner cities by generating automatic reminders to doctors, parents, and school principals. "Neighborhood Early Warning Systems" that give advance warning when communities are headed for trouble (based on vacancies, loan delinquencies, etc.) Curbcuts on the Information Superhighway: Information technology can make it easier for more than 50 million Americans with disabilities to participate in the workplace and increase their independence -- but only if information technology is designed from the beginning to be usable by all Americans. For example, speech recognition technology can allow people with disabilities who can not use a keyboard to use a computer. By converting "text to speech" -- technology can dramatically increase the information that people who are blind or low vision have access to. Health care: Personal health information systems can allow people to make more informed decisions about their health care needs. Telemedicine can improve the quality of care in rural areas by giving patients access to the best specialists in the country. Crisis management/public safety: Improvements in supercomputer technology will increase our ability to predict tornadoes and other natural and man-made disasters, and respond to them once they have occurred. Delivery of government services: Information technology can make the government more responsive, user-friendly, and transparent. The use of information technology has been a cornerstone of the Vice-President's National Performance Review. IV. Potential risks of the Information Revolution such as privacy In recent years, Americans have become increasingly concerned about their privacy. In a recent Louis Harris poll, eight out of ten Americans surveyed agreed that "consumers have lost all control over how personal information about them is circulated and used by companies." Earlier this year, a three-part, front page Washington Post series highlighted a number of examples of the growing erosion of personal privacy, including sales by state governments of personal information. mitspee.wpd Page 4 Clearly, new technologies have made it easier to create, manipulate, store, transmit, and link digital personally identifiable information. People may disclose personal information about themselves as they travel, fill a prescription at the drug store, visit a Web site, call a 1-800 number, send an e-mail, use a credit card, or purchase groceries using a discount card. Information about these individual transactions may be bought and sold - and companies are now assembling giant "data warehouses" that contain electronic dossiers on the needs, lifestyles, and spending habits of millions of Americans. These concerns are not just hypothetical. Beverly Dennis, a women in Massillion, Ohio, received a 12-page letter containing an intimately threatening sexual fantasy from a stranger who knew her birthday, the names of her favorite magazines, the fact that she was divorced, and the kind of soap she used in the shower. The letter was written by a convicted rapist serving time in a Texas state prison, who had been entering information for Metromail, a direct marketing firm with detailed databases on more than 90 percent of American households. Dennis' suit disclosed that Metromail had 900 pieces of information on her going back to 1987, including not only her income, marital status, hobbies, ailments, but whether she had dentures, the brands of antacid tablets she had taken, and how often she had used room deodorizers, sleeping aids, and hemorrhoid remedies. The NEC and DPC are reviewing options to strengthen privacy protection, including: (1) meaningful industry self-regulation; (2) establishing a focal point for privacy issues within the federal government; and (3) initiatives or legislation that are designed to target specific aspects of the privacy problem (e.g. medical records, kids, companies that develop "electronic dossiers" on millions of Americans). It may also make sense to establish an initiative that looks at the broader ethical, legal, and social implications of the Information Revolution. Currently, there is no equivalent in the information technology area of the ESLI (Ethical, Legal and Social Implications) Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute. ELSI supports basic and applied research that identifies and analyzes ethical, legal and social issues surrounding human genetics research, such as: discrimination in insurance and employment based on genetic information; when and how new genetic tests should be integrated into health care services; and informed consent in genetics research. Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 002. note Handwritten. Commencement. (8 pages) 04/1998 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Speechwriting Jeff Shesol OA/Box Number: 18672 FOLDER TITLE: Commencement 6/5/98 [MIT, Cambridge, MA] 2006-0467-F vz1276 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRAJ b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRAJ b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRAJ an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRAJ b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. as text, 2 3 NEC (II) not attachment (I) @ b3 [email protected] [email protected] NEC Meeting 4/23 mw: 4 major challenges of lufo Age - equality - privacy - Demonacy / citizenship - competition making new tech work for old values GS:- something compelling, provoctive smaller elements that may give up weight (Kalil ( memo) Raines 1) tech diffusion things happening in econ unexplainable by old models but tech diff happened in fumy way - give every macline its own Little motor / ie, BE no longer one central C 2) computer diffusion how you org. knowledge - TJ TJ cd read all there was to read but by end 19the books just piled up a s tacles had to invent Dewen (see Rudentime ap. on Whole new approach to 2) opportunity Dmclier - great opp to 9 equality is when you have dishiption .e, auto mechanic has to start from scratch to learn computers omp to fall behind but also opp to leap food were pushing 1) +2) 2) + were muce 1993 were been prepaing people for new econ, new challenges -fits w/- agenda Withdrawal/Redaction Marker Clinton Library DOCUMENT NO. SUBJECT/TITLE DATE RESTRICTION AND TYPE 003. note Handwritten. Format Unclear. (1 page) 04/1998 P5 COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records Speechwriting Jeff Shesol OA/Box Number: 18672 FOLDER TITLE: Commencement 6/5/98 [MIT, Cambridge, MA] 2006-0467-F vz1276 RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)] Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA] b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA] b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA] an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA] b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA] b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA] b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of of gift. financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information 2201(3). concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] RR. Document will be reviewed upon request. 10:30 Reagan - NATO' "victory lap" sign NATO 1 Radio address Jordan shipped town Statistics or IRS left me w/ this radio address Child letter or parent letter