Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
Records pertain to the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
285792607
label
Executive Office of the President: Presidential Priorities (4) [5 of 7] [1992]
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
285792607
contentType
document
title
Executive Office of the President: Presidential Priorities (4) [5 of 7] [1992]
description
Records pertain to the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
citationUrl
identifierLocal
62090-003
collections
Records of the White House Office of Science and Technology (George H. W. Bush Administration)
Allan D. Bromley Files
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
285792607
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
1fc7c322cfff89f8
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s):
FOIA Number:
2005-0336-F
2005-0336-F
FOIA
MARKER
This is not a textual record. This is used as an
administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential
Library Staff.
Record Group/Collection:
George H.W. Bush Presidential Records
Collection/Office of Origin:
Science and Technology Policy, Office of (OSTP)
Series:
Bromley, D. Allan, Files
Subseries:
Presidential Priorities Files
OA/ID Number:
62090
Folder ID Number:
62090-003
Folder Title:
Executive Office of the President: Presidential Priorities (4) [5 of 7] [1992]
Stack:
Row:
Section:
Shelf:
Position:
0
0
0
0
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201235
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Dr. and Mrs. Christopherson
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/19/92
SUBJECT: They are writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft fo DAB'signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/25/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9h01235
Hold
CHRISTOPHERSONs
809 Tule Lake Road S.
Tacoma, WA 98444
Tel. (206)537-3328
February 19, 1992
President George H. W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear President Bush:
We fully concur with the decisions of the 44th, 45th and 46th General Assemblies which agreed
to convene the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), and
urged that representation be at the level of Head of State.
While the present state of our own United States economy is not without difficulties, our own
wealth and resources are still without parallel in today's world. We strongly urge, therefore, that
you, through your own personal involvement and through your instructed delegates and
committees, exercise the strongest possible leadership in building a global agenda at UNCED
that truly addresses the inseparable needs of balanced development for all people and of
safeguarding the future of the planet's ecosystems. This cannot be done, in our opinion, unless a
genuine global partnership is established between developing and industrialized countries which
addresses the following:
a) the fact that there is still a net drain of income and wealth from the developing to the
industrialized countries which leaves the former unable to bear the full cost of setting
aside scarce resources and of developing/purchasing new technologies more protective of
the environment;
b) the ecological reality that changes in lifestyle regarding population numbers and
consumption patterns that are incumbent on all peoples;
c) the moral reality that changes in decision-making in all economic and political
institutions must promote more democratic participation and distributive justice for all
nations.
We thank you for listening to this plea, and urge that you make such leadership an important part
of our nation's election year debate.
Sincerely, Kennath and Phylist Christopherson
Dr. and Mrs. K.E. Christopherson
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201259
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Patricia Overmeyer
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/19/92
SUBJECT: She is writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/24/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
51
Earth
9201259
Patricia Overmeyer
5112 Parklawn Terr. #102
Rockville, MD 20852
February 19, 1992
President George Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington D.C.
Dear President Bush:
It dismays me that the President of the United States, a man that
has himself said he is the leader of the "greatest nation on
earth," is doing everything possible to make the United States
appear to be the most apathetic and uncaring nation on earth.
This June, a great dream could come true. All the nations of the
world could come together at one summit to recognize the
importance of the world we live in, the world that sustains us.
All the nations of the world could get together and agree to take
steps to save our global environment and meet the needs of all
peoples by assuring that our environment is protected for our
posterity.
In preparation for the United Nations Conference on Environment
and Development (UNCED), other world leaders are negotiating a
global warming treaty to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide
and other ozone-destroying gases which are believed to contribute
to the greenhouse effect--an environmental phenomena that may
destroy life as we know it. Where are you Mr. Bush? How can you
pronounce that the United States is the greatest nation on earth
and then represent this country to the effect of turning your
back on the earth and its people (and posterity). Do you really
think that any penny you may save the almighty American
industries by turning away from this summit of global importance
will be better spent in perpetuating the destruction of our
earth?
The United States of America should be a world leader on
environmental protection. We should be taking a stand against
the destruction of our wildlife and natural resources. Instead
we are crusaders of destruction. We (you) are turning our back
on life itself.
I urge you to rethink your policy on global warming and on
America's representation at the UNCED summit. Please, provide
President Bush
February 19, 1992
Page 2
the world with leadership. The United States must sign a global
warming treaty that sets targets and timetables for reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases. We must also take a leadership
role in promoting reductions in the use of all toxic
constituents. The United States must show our commitment to the
world by committing to attend UNCED. You must signal to other
nations that environmental protection is a top priority for the
government of the United States.
We need an "environmental President" in the White House. The
world needs a leader for environmental protection. To date, you
are not the man. I believe that it may not be too late to
change.
Sincerely,
Patricia Overmeyer
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201313
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Robert L. Raines
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/19/92
SUBJECT: He is writing to convey his support for President
Bush and his "No Regret's Policy"
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/25/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
encloses article
on global warning
9201313
PQCAHONTAS LAND CORPORATION
POCAHONTAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
800 Princeton Avenue
P.O. Box 1517
Robert L. Raines
Bluefield, West Virginia 24701
President
(304) 325-2054 - Telecopier
(304) 325-7346
Managrad
February 19, 1992
OSTP/
The Honorable George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
Attached is an article that appeared in the February issue of Mining Engineering
magazine. I thought it might be helpful in dispelling all the misinformation about this subject
that seems to pervade the news media in the political circles.
we
Sincerely,
Rohut L. Raines
Robert L. Raines
President
RLR:cb
GLOBAL.HES
NS
NORFOLK
The
SOUTHERN
Thoroughbred
Tiph
Tiph
Tiphx
" FERMS ARY 1902
Tsy
Tsy
Xgd
Tb
Xgd
Fig. 13777 GLOBE
HILL
AJAX
Tbr
5
Xgd
Tiph
Tiph
Xgnb
Tiph
Tsy
Tph
Xgnb
7
CRIPPLE
1A OI 2629060
Mr Robert L Raines
POCAHONTAS LAND CORP
CREEK
Box 1517
Bluefield, WV 24701
8°45'
Global warming — an
engineering appraisal
Raphael G. Kazmann
There are a number of data sets that
The predicted warming of the earth's
surface, presently the subject of much
Some scientists think the
can be used to evaluate the likelihood of
debate, controversy and legislation, is
global warming caused by the activities
based on what is termed "the green-
earth's temparture will
of man (anthropomorphic impacts).
house effect." This is the result of the
rise between 2° and 8° F
These include temperature measure-
property of certain atmospheric gases.
ments, including those over and in the
These gases allow the passage of radiant
by the end of the 21st
oceans, carbon dioxide measurements,
energy to the earth's surface and reflect
century. In 1980, it was
observations of glaciers, the northern-
back, to the earth, the infrared radiation
most limits of certain species of trees,
predicted that this would
given out by the heated surface. Physi-
percentage of cloud cover, sea level
cists have computed that if there were
cause the sea level to
changes and precipitation measure-
no greenhouse effect the average tem-
rise 7.6 m (21 ft). By
ments. All of these parameters, and
perature of the earth, now about 15° C
more, should reflect any change in cli-
(60°F would be close to -18° C (0°F).
1985, that prediction
mate, whatever the direction of change.
was revised to 1 m (3 ft).
It is well established that the carbon
Just what gases have produced this
salubrious effect? Water vapor is the
dioxide content of the atmosphere has
most important. Then come carbon
That prediction was re-
risen from about 275 ppmv (parts per
dioxide, methane and a number of mi-
vised again by 1989
million by volume) before 1850 to 345
nor constituents of the atmosphere, both
ppmv in 1985. Over the same period,
to 0.3 m (1 ft).
natural and man-made.
methane went from 0.7 ppmv to 1.7
Climate change, its cause and its
ppmv (US Department of Energy, 1990).
impact on human activities have been
The temperature data is not "clean."
the subject of scientific and historical
will occur due to human activity and
The measurements have been compli-
study for more than a century. Recently,
that all efforts should be made to reduce
cated by the "heat island" effect. Cities
some scientists have concluded that if
the production of carbon dioxide, meth-
are warmer than the surrounding coun-
the man-made increase in the carbon
ane, etc. and regardless of cost, lest a
tryside. So the temperatures recorded at
dioxide and other greenhouse gases
disaster occur. Politicians see the de-
the original weather stations have slowly
continues, by the late 21st century the
bate as a publicity vehicle and an issue
risen as the stations were surrounded by
earth's global average temperature will
on which to obtain political office and
the nearby cities as the suburbs ex-
rise between 2° to 8°F. This tempera-
power. The so-called environmentalists
panded.
ture rise would cause the water in the
see an opportunity to impose all manner
Much effort has been expended to
oceans to expand and the massive polar
of economic changes on society, from
remove the heat island effect and it is
glaciers to melt. In 1980, it was pre-
mandating auto efficiencies to reducing
likely that the effort has improved the
dicted that the sea level would rise 7.6 m
methane production by decreasing meat
quality of the data. A more serious
(25f by the late 21 st century. By 1985,
consumption. A research project to
deficiency is that about 72% of the earth's
the predicted rise was 1 m (3 ft); and by
determine how much methane is pro-
surface is covered by water and meas-
1989, it was 0.3 m (1 ft) (Jastrow, Nier-
duced by individual cows has just been
urements of air and water temperature
enberg and Seitz, 1990). Agricultural
funded by an appropriation of $200,000.
have been both sporadic and not well-
scientists have pointed out that an in-
Third World nations are using the
distributed spatially.
crease in atmospheric carbon dioxide
issue of possible global climate warm-
The records of air temperature in the
would enhance biological growth in-
ing to extract economic assistance from
contiguous 48 states are geographically
cluding the production of foodstuffs.
the developed nations. Presumably this
well distributed and cover more than a
would enable Third World nations to
century. From 1885 through 1984 there
Present debate- Science or politics?
participate in the effort to reduce atmos-
is no discernible trend: the mean tem-
The present public debate takes for
pheric pollution.
perature was 11.4°C (52.5° F). Between
granted that a rise in global temperature
The discussion is no longer a scien-
1895 and 1940, the temperature rose
tific one. It now promises to have direct
about 0.4 of a degree. Between 1940
impact on the politics, economics and
and 1970, it declined. And since 1970
livelihood of all of us. As engineers, we
there has been no clear cut trend (Jas-
are obligated to examine the facts and
trow, Nierenberg and Seitz, 1990).
Raphael G. Kazmann, member SME, is a
consulting engineer, 231 Duplantier Blvd.,
the theories before reaching our conclu-
From 1979 to 1990, satellite measure-
Baton Rouge, LA 70808.
sions and recommendations (if any).
ments of global average temperature,
while variable, have exhibited no trend,
according to a graph prepared by John
Global warming predictions are a scare based on
R. Christy of the NASA Marshall Space
Flight Center. This information is es-
incomplete and far from robust mathematical models,
sentially corroborated (US Department
plus the desire of politicians to spend money without
of Energy, 1990) where global and
hemispheric temperature changes are
computing the costs and benefits. The predictions
shown in graphical form. And a similar
reveal serious deficiencies in data and theory. These
temperature increase is found between
1880 and 1940 and a similar decline
should be corrected before any worldwide agreements
between 1940 and 1970.
are signed to prevent any sort of global disaster.
Changes in climate
Climate has changed drastically dur-
take into account the site-specific con-
800 km (500 miles) in extent at the
ing historical times. For example, in
ditions that might have been ignored in
latitude of the US and Europe. The
986 AD, Eric the Red established a
deriving them. In many instances, the
reason the areas are so large is that
viable settlement in the fjords of Green-
range of applicability was governed by
currently available computers do not
land- the climate was warm. By 1400,
codes of practice. Engineers also have
have the speed or power to describe
with the climate colder and the polar ice
to consider economic viability as well as
conditions in smaller areas and to com-
limit further south, the last of the colo-
such parameters as safety, health and
pute the interrelationships in a reasona-
nists had perished farming was no
the structure's life.
bly short period of time. From an engi-
longer possible. So here we have a
The job of the scientist is, basically, to
neering viewpoint, any index area that
climatic temperature high (similar to the
try to extend the body of knowledge, to
includes Oregon, which is both humid
one that we now enjoy), followed by a
make new correlations, and to create
and semiarid, and Nevada and encom-
period of declining temperatures that
new theories and to test them. If the
seems to have ended in the early part of
passes mountain ranges is too large and
theory proves to be wrong, possibly on
too complex to be represented by a single
the 18th century.
the basis of new observations, so what?
In the United States as late as 1850,
number for any parameter that you can
The only loss is the time and effort of the
name. The results of operating such a
Natchez, MS was the northernmost point
scientist and the funds expended to
model cannot be expected to be reliable,
on the river that oranges could be grown
support him. The gain is that another
when it comes to real-world decision
without protection (Twain, 1896). This
blind-alley has been found and we will
making. What is needed here, for start-
is no longer true. The last commercially
not go that way any more.
ers, is computing power two or three
grown orange groves near the river were
south of New Orleans and these were
Computer models used in forecasting
orders of magnitude faster and more
the greenhouse effect divide the earth's
destroyed in the early 1980s by frost.
powerful than those now available. Then
surface into small areas. The models
the index areas could be reduced in size
Then there is the "Plant Hardiness
Zone Map" periodically produced by
make the assumption that the tempera-
and their homogeneity improved.
ture in the area along with other parame-
Tsonis (1991) discussed the sensitiv-
the US Department of Agriculture. It
ters can each be represented by a single
shows the low temperatures that control
ity of the global climate system models
number. These small areas are about
to initial conditions. As an example, he
plant survival. The 1990 map shows that
the zones shown in the 1965 map are
now from 5° to 10° F colder. There is no
1.0
warming trend. The north line of com-
mercially grown orange trees in Florida
0.8
has been gradually moving south for the
0.6
past two decades.
This brief summary of some of the
available data does not include informa-
TEMPERATURE DEPARTURES (°C)
0.4
0.2
tion on cloud cover, precipitation, gla-
cier movements or emissions from vol-
0.0
canoes. Much of this information is
-0.2
quite limited chronologically and spa-
tially, although it is pertinent to a com-
-0.4
plete evaluation of our knowledge of
global climate change. None of the
-0.6
information that the author has seen
-0.8
contradicts given observations.
-1.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
The Models - and their limitations
Engineers have long been familiar
TIME (YEARS)
with mathematical models. Those used
before the advent of the digital com-
puter were called "formulas." Students
Fig. 1 - Simulated global mean temperature record for 108 years, based on a model that
simulated the observed mean temperature record quite well. The two records, indicated by thin
were warned that formulas should be
and thick lines, started from very similar initial conditions (1% difference). Note the wide
used cautiously. The formulas should
discrepancy after the first 40 years of record (from Tsonis).
sions about global warming are similar
to former scenarios of nuclear winter,
1.0
cancer-causing cranberries, $100 oil or
0.8
the asbestos-cancer scare.
This is not to say that local communi-
0.6
TEMPERATURE DEPARTURES (°C)
ties that believe that industrial and ve-
0.4
hicular emissions are an immediate threat
to local health should not take action to
0.2
protect themselves. But there is simply
0.0
no justification for nationwide and
worldwide panic about global warming.
-0.2
If the climate does warm up, it will be
slow in terms of human lifetimes and
-0.4
there will be plenty of time to consider
-0.6
what to do and what action to take.
If anything is to be learned from this
-0.8
episode, it is that we need faster and
-1.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
more powerful computers and climate
models that are robust. These will be
TIME (YEARS)
developed in due course, probably
sooner than anyone would predict. But
Fig. 2- Same as Fig. 1, but for different initial conditions. Here the two records lose any
the most important deficiency is our
resemblance after about 55 years. Note that no one claims to know the long-term average of any
lack of knowledge of the parameters
of the parameters used, to within 1% of their "true" value (from Tsonis).
and relationships that control global
temperatures. These would include the
made a number of runs on the General
sunlight and decrease the radiation reach-
solar constant (it's not), the causes and
Climate Model (GCM) used by Hansen
ing the surface and thus act to negate any
extents and effects of various types of
of the Goddard Space Center. Each run
temperature rise - a negative feed-
cloud cover, mass balances of carbon
produces a record of temperatures for
back.
dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane,
108 years. The model produces vastly
Similarly, if warming should occur
sulphur, ocean currents, and the response
different predictions of temperature
and the permafrost were to retreat north-
of algae to changes in climate.
starting from 40 to 55 years into the run,
ward, the permafrost peat bogs would
In short, global-warming predictions
depending on the assumed initial condi-
thaw to a greater depth and dry out and
are a scare based on incomplete and far
tions.
oxidize. This would add to the carbon
from robust mathematical models plus
A 1% difference in the initial condi-
dioxide and methane in the atmosphere
the desire of politicians to spend money
tions was enough to create totally differ-
thus adding to the warming - an ex-
without computing the costs and bene-
ent predictions of global temperature
ample of possible positive feedback. At
fits.
over the last half of the period. Figures
the moment, we simply do not know
The predictions reveal serious defi-
1 and 2 show the results of running the
enough about these and similar phe-
ciencies in data and theory. These defi-
model, each pair of runs with initial
nomena, and their geographic extent, to
ciencies should be corrected before any
conditions differing by 1%. In short, the
take them into account.
world-wide agreements are signed to
model is not robust. This is another
prevent one sort of global disaster or
illustration of the engineer's axiom,
An engineering evaluation
another.
"Hell hath no fury like an unjustified
The data show that the average tem-
As engineers, it is fitting that we pro-
assumption!"
perature in the continental US has not
ceed with caution. Let us base our
The uncertainties produced by lack of
changed significantly during the past
actions on theories that have been
computing power and lack of model
100 years. Other information indicates
checked by field measurement rather
robustness pale beside the uncertainties
that the climate may actually be getting
than advocate actions based on faulty
posed by lack of knowledge of the de-
colder, not warmer. So any claim that
computer models and an evident lack of
tails. Such details include, for example,
anthropogenic gases are creating global
understanding of all of the interacting
understanding of cloud production and
warming must be viewed with suspi-
parameters that create local and global
inadequate knowledge of positive and
cion. After all, the models that predict
climate changes.
negative feedbacks.
warming do not agree in detail among
Some gases, such as dimethyl sulfide,
themselves and, moreover, do not ap-
References
are emitted by certain species of marine
pear to be robust.
Boston, P.J., 1989, "Gaia: a New Look at Global Ecology and
Evolution," Global Climate Change, F. Singer, ed., Paragon
algae and are converted to sulfate aero-
So there is no demonstrable global
House, p. 394.
sols. These are believed to act as con-
warming, although the models predict
Jastrow, R.W. Nierenberg and F. Seitz, 1990, Scientific
densation nuclei in the formation of
that by now there should have been
Perspectives on the Greenhouse Problem, Jameson Books,
Ottawa, IL, p. 5.1. 38.
clouds (Boston, 1989). If the sea tem-
some measurable effect as a result of the
perature were to rise slightly, the stock
increase in greenhouse gases. Conse-
Tsonis. A.A., 1991, Sensitivity of the Global Climate System
to Initial Conditions, EOS, n. 30, p. 328.
of algae might well increase, accompa-
quently, there is no apparent need for
nied by an increase in the number of
industrialized nations to make wrench-
Twain. M., 1896, Life on the Mississippi, Harper Bros., ch. 39.
condensation nuclei.
ing changes in their industries and the
US Department of Energy, 1990, Global Climate Trends and
Greenhouse Gas
Such a change could result in an in-
lives of their citizens to cap carbon
Data: Federal Activities in Data Collection, Archiving. and
crease in cloud cover that would reflect
dioxide buildup. The current apprehen-
Dissemination. DOE-PE 0094P, p. 73, 85.
MINING ENGINEERING
April 7, 1992
Dear Mr. Raines:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your very kind comments on US
activities related to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) on
a framework convention on climate change. The President appreciates your
support and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 19, 1992
regarding this issue.
The President strongly believes that US policies in this area must be based
on the most solid scientific and economic information base available. As you
mentioned, the US Global Change Research Program is the world's largest
such program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for
international agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. In fact, the
Bush Administration has invested $2.6 billion in global change research to
date, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for fiscal 1993. Research on
the scientific and economic aspects of global climate change will enable policy
makers to make better judgements about potential impacts and policy
actions.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on this issue and we
appreciate your support.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Mr. Robert L. Raines
800 Princeton Avenue
P.O. Box 1517
Bluefield, West Virginia 24601
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201143
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
SMITH, MRS. JACK, C.
TO:
PRESIDENT BUSH
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/19/92
SUBJECT: SHE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SUMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9201143
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Mrs. Smith:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 19, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - Mrs. Smith
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 -- over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - Mrs. Smith
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forwardinto the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED -- results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
D.Anan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Mrs. Jack C. Smith
3708 Manor Road
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
Mrs. Jack unced C. Smith
3708 Manor Rd.
Chevy Chase, MD 20815
Feb 19, 1992
President George H.W Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ar NW
Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr. President,
2 am really concerned about your
decision, as of Thes date, not to attend the
Earth Summit in June in Reode Janeiro. The
United States Goornment stands alone 4 its
lack of commettment to lessening and even
reasising the factors which contribute to the
degradation of the environment.
It doesn't Take a rochet scientest, as they
plotted for earthis temperature and the amount
say, to note the parallel track which has been
of carbon dioxide un the atmosphere over cons
of time. We already can project that our the
next decade, in our frenzy to drur automobiles
and burn non-renewable fossil fuel reserves, we
will push the level of CO2 we the air up by
surral hundred percent, unless there is a turn-
around in our wasteful habits. a careful scientest
would note that with The excessive destruction of
trees and plant life everywhere on this planet,
there is no capacity for reabsorbing (recycling)
This gas which contributes so much to The green-
house effect and thus very probably to global warm-
ing. He would say "Let's not pash our luck, Let's
reverse the Trend of excersive exploitation of resources
The United States is not related from The rest
of the world, yet it stands in apposition to 139
countries who are concerned about elimate and
who wish to formulate a world wide energy policy.
Our policy sume to be "Don't propose anything That
might make the auto industry on the consumery public
mad." Thes is not leaderskip, whech trees to plan
for the future. Thes is pandering to the most
selfish segments of our population. I don't thank
we haer the reght to do this, when our actions may
breap suffering to future generations around the
world.
Sincerely
Charlotte D. Smith
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201158
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
WALLS, CAROL
TO:
PRESIDENT BUSH
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/18/92
SUBJECT: SHE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SUMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9261158
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Mrs. Walls:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 18, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - - Mrs. Walls
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - - Mrs. Walls
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forwardinto the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED - results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
DAnan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Mrs. Carol Walls
P.O. Box 163
Laurel, Maryland 20725
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
DEAR ME. BUSH:
I URGE YOU TO CONSIDER ATTENDING OR SENDING A REPRESENTATIVE
TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIORNMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE IN JUNE, 1992. I CAN'T STRESS
HOW IMPORTANT WE TAKE STEPS TO SAVE OUR WORLD. IF WE
ALL DO NOT WORK TOGETHER, WE WILL END UP DESTROYING OUR
PLANET.
PLEASE CONSIDER ATTENDING THIS MEETING. THANK YOU.
SINCERELY,
CAROL WALLS
PO BOX 163
LAUREL MD 20725
MRS CAROL A WALLS
PO BOX 163
SOUTHERN PM MD
PARTNERS
LAUREL MD 20725-0163
ENERGY EFFICIEN
SCF 18 FEB 206
TOMORROW USA29
1992
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON DC 20500
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201159
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
JULEN, KIMBERLEY
TO:
PRESIDENT BUSH
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/17/92
SUBJECT: SHE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SUMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9201159
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Ms. Julen:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 17, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - - Ms. Julen
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - - Ms. Julen
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forwardinto the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED - results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
DAnan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Ms. Kimberley K. Julen
10600 Ideal Avenue South
Cottage Grove, Minnesota
UNITED
Dear Sir,
My name is Kimberley
Kaye Julen and I am currently
attending university &Wiscosin
River Falls. At the college we
have a recycling program for
number 1 and 2 plastics, Aluminum
cans, news paper, and writing paper.
This program has been very
successful with out much promotion.
I feel you have also been very
success ful by banning the use
of aerosol cans several years
earlier than planned. Although
it would be a greater im pact on
the united states if you attended
the Earth summit June I - 12.
Sincerely,
Kimberley K. Julin
Kimberley K. Julen
90000$
190SE
any 1957 9 220.99
MY 01992 Odn sand way Jogy
Hind
060 P1 GOLD,
divertiff 100% 21/20
20 Dr broow ocu
SFOR
Ctu 00
X
40
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201281
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Dr. and Mrs. Stephen Munson
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/17/92
SUBJECT: They are urging the President to attend the Earth
Summit in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document #9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/25/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
51
earth
RAUN
9201281
55 St. Paul Street, Rochester, New York 14604-1391
716-232-1080
Rochester Association
for the
United Nations
February, 1992
Affiliated with the
United Nations
Association of the
United States
of America, Inc.
OFFICERS
President George Bush
The White House
President
Bryan D. Hickman
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
First Vice President
Washington, DC 20500
J. Paul Gocker
Vice Presidents
Dear Mr. President:
Gillian S. Kellogg
Barbara Letvin
Carole Ann Ward
I fully concur with the decisions of the 44th, 45th
and 46th General Assemblies that agreed to convene the
Secretary
Elizabeth L. Webb
United Nations Conference on Environment and
Development (UNCED), and urged that representation be
Treasurer
Kenneth J. Burke
at the level of Head of State. Such a summit is of
the greatest importance for a new world order that
Assistant Treasurer
Scott A. Cameron
provides for our children's children.
Executive Director
Freyda E. Albin
While the present state of our own United States
economy is not without some difficulties, our own
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
wealth and resources are still without parallel in
Board Chairperson
today's world. I strongly urge you, therefore, that
Krestie Utech
through your own personal involvement and through your
Ellen A. Anderson
instructed delegates and committees, to exercise the
George M. Angle
strongest possible leadership in building a global
Lynn S. Bickley
Eleanora Church
agency at UNCED that truly addresses the inseparable
Mark Collins
needs of balanced development for all peoples and of
Michael F. Cook
Elizabeth Boyer Cooney
safeguarding the future of the planet's ecosystems.
Janis T. Dowd
Scott A. Forsyth
Larry Greenfield
This cannot be done, in my opinion, unless a genuine
Robert Kraus
global partnership is established between developing
Sally K. Majors
Eleanor R. Newell
and industrialized countries that addresses the
William R. Nojay
following:
James Y. Oldshue
Hon. Elizabeth Pine
Judith Reynolds
a) the fact that there is still a net drain of
Tamara Sonn
Manuel A. Sosa
income and wealth from the developing to the
Michael Warren Thomas
industrialized countries that leaves them unable
Grace S. Tillinghast
Kay A. Wallace
to bear the full cost of setting aside scarce
Linda Weiner
resources and of developing/purchasing new
Martha W. Weissberger
John Wolfe
technologies more protective of the environment
cont'd, over
Cont'd, President George Bush
UNCED Conference
b) the ecological reality that changes in lifestyle
regarding population numbers and consumption
patterns are incumbent on all peoples
c) the moral reality that changes in decision-
making in all economic and political
institutions must promote more democratic
participation and distributive justice for all
nations.
Thank you for listening to this plea, and I urge that
you make such leadership an important part of our
nation's election year debate.
Sincerely,
Dr. $ Mrs. Stephen Munson
Rochester Association for the United Nations
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201216
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Judith R. Nourse James C. Nourse, Ph.D.
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE:
SUBJECT: They are writing the president to urge him to attend
the Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document numbe 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/17/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
Unced
9201216
28 Finns Point Lane
Hampton, VA 23669
February 17, 1992
President Bush
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
We are writing to urge you to commit the U.S. to cutting carbon
dioxide emissions in the climate treaty negotiations and to
attend the Earth Summit to provide the leadership needed to
address critical global environmental issues.
We are also very concerned about your administration's proposals
to change the policy of "no net loss" of wetlands. We would like
to remind you of your campaign promise to protect our nation's
wetlands, and urge you to support a study by the National Academy
of Sciences before proceeding with proposed changes.
Sincerely,
Ladith R. Nourse
Judith R. Nourse, RN
0000 James C. Nourse, Ph.D.
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201156
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
POLYS, MARGE (SISTER)
TO:
PRESIDENT BSUH
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/17/92
SUBJECT: SHE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SUMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION:
DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9201156
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Sr. Polys:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 17, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - Sr. Polys
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 -- over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - - Sr. Polys
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forwardinto the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED - results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
DAnan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Sr. Marge Polys
Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary
Coordinator of Ministries
610 West Avenue
Monroe, Michigan 48161
unceD
IHM
SISTERS, SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY
OFFICES OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION
610 West Elm Avenue
Monroe, Michigan 48161
313-241-0092
President Bush
The White House
Pennsylvania Ave.
Dorothy McDaniel, IHM
President
Washington, DC 20500
Patricia Guthrie, IHM
Vice President
February 17, 1992
Marjorie Polys, IHM
Coordinator
of Ministries
Dear Mr. President,
Mary Ann Untener, IHM
Coordinator
I am writing in the name of the Sisters Servants of the
of Human Resources
Immaculate Heart of Mary, a religious community of 870
women educators.
Lois Jackson, IHM
Coordinator
of Material Resources
We are concerned over the lack of convincing and
forceful effort being applied by our government with regard
to participation in the upcoming Earth Summit in Rio.
We would like to encourage your administration to
take a more constructive stance toward this historic world
gathering. We believe it is necessary for you to reflect a
stronger position on environmental protection and to be
more supportive of the objectives of the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development.
We are counting on your leadership in this matter.
Sincerely,
marge Palys, IHM
Sr. Marge Polys, IHM
IHM Coordinator of
Ministries
MP/ee
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201215
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Ethan Russell
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE:
SUBJECT: He is writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See reponse on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/17/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
Uneed
ETHAN RUSSELL & ASSOCIATES
1205 ARDEN ROAD
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91106
TELEPHONE: (818) 792-9324
FAX: (818) 792-3252
7201215
February 24, 1992
President George Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC
Dear President Bush:
Congratulations for your part in implementing the following:
"President Bush announced last week that production of ozone-
depleting chlorofluorocarbons, used in air conditioning and
cleaning solvents, will be eliminated in the United States by Dec.
31, 1995."
However, the same article stated, regarding the US' stance vis
a vis the "greenhouse effect" and the upcoming Earth Summit: "The
U.S. government argues that each nation should be free to take
whatever steps it considers necessary to reduce emissions of gases
that can trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the
greenhouse effect. " This nationalist response is offered as the
rationale for why the United States will not come into step with
the other nations on this issue. The United States cannot ask
underdeveloped countries to stop damaging the environment "if 4
percent of the world's population can be responsible for 24
percent of greenhouse gas emissions," said Kazuo Aichi, a Japanese
parliament member and former chief of Japan's environmental agency.
I agree.
Unhappily, our position seems very much to me like a passenger
insisting that he has the right to drill a hole in the hull of a
boat as long as he does so from within his own cabin. Clearly,
these issues are global, we must come into compliance with world
views, and we must insist, as in the CFC area, that others have no
more right to continue to damage the ozone layer simply because the
source originates from within their national boundaries. The
consequences, after all, are clearly global.
These, and other related environmental issues, seem of primary
importance to me: more pressing than the issues on the economy,
since their results are more pervasive and longer lasting. Your,
and the Administration's, attitudes in this respect, will surely
influence my vote in the next elections.
With best wishes,
mammer
Ethan Russell
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201243
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Dr. Oswald T. Saavedra
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/17/92
SUBJECT: He is writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document #9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/25/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
is
OSWALD T. SAAVEDRA, M.D., P.A.
DIPLOMATE AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
1315 S. ORANGE AVENUE, SUITE 3A
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32806
TELEPHONE (407) 423-4680
February 17, 1991
9201243
The President George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
I am writing this letter in behalf of our medical society and also
in behalf of my children and their generations after.
Our planet is in great dispair and in need of treatment as soon as
possible. I urge you to reverse your position on global climate
policies and implore you to join all other countries in the world
to stabilize C02 emissions at present level.
Attending the Earth Summit in Rio, in person, will have a tremendous
effect in emphasizing our country's leadership in this matter. Most
of us voted for you just because you were the "environmental candidate".
We all hope you will maintain that promise.
I personally have seen the miseries of environmental pollution with
the subsequent effects on population while I lived and studied in
the ex-USSR. I hope damage in such a degree will never occur anywhere
else in the world.
We all feel that this planet is too precious to loose it!
Respectfully,
Oswald T. Saavedra, M.D.
OTS / jb Jacusens
CC: Chairman Orange County
Medical Society
Environmental committee
CC: Christine Riddiough, Field
Coordinator-Union of Concerned
Scientists, Washington, D.C.
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201256
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS c
FROM:
Claudia Utley
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/16/92
SUBJECT: She is writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB's signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/20/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
51
Earth
CLAUDIA UTLEY
4433 Colbath Ave. #42 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 (818) 986-0754
9201256
February 16, 1992
President George Bush
The White House
Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
You had to take a lot of flak in the last few months for your
frequent overseas trips. Nevertheless, I urge you to please
attend the United Nations Conference on Environment and
Development (UNCED), better known as Earth Summit, in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, this coming June. The conference will provide a
crucial framework for worldwide conservation efforts and reforms.
I am dismayed that you as "environmental president of the United
States of America" are not yet acknowledging the importance of
this summit or, better still, planning to attend it. This
indifference sends a troubling sign to Americans and other
nations who wonder how committed U.S. politicians are to their
claims as global leaders and responsible residents of our world.
Please attend Earth Summit either personally or represented by a
high-standing government official from your administration.
Sincerely,
Claudia Claudia Utley Utley
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201154
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
FORMAN, DOUGLAS
TO:
PRESIDENT BUSH
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/15/92
SUBJECT: HE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SIMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION:
DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
920 9201154 1154
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Mr. Forman:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 15, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - - Mr. Forman
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 -- over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - Mr. Forman
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forwardinto the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED - results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
D.Anan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Mr. Douglas Forman
5404 Wilson lane
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Unced
5404 Wilson Lane
Betherda MO 20814
February 15, 1992
The President
The White House
Washing ton D.C. 20500
Dear mr President:
I have been learning about the
United nations Conference on Environment and
Development to be held in Rio de Janeiro inJume
a lead role in This critical conference and the first
Ir is very important that our country play
step is for you to announce soon that you will
role go. at The Preparatory Commission meetings
The second step is for the us to play a in constructive
New york in march,
your prestige around the world is high will
benefit not only The United States, but The world.
and your leadership on environmental issues which
We need to control our carbon dioxide emissions,
strengthen The international institutions, and fund
adequately the ON essential programs,
I would welcome a reply as to your
decisions on there matters.
Respectfully Douglas Forman
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201219
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Edward B. Meservey
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/15/23
SUBJECT: He is writing to urge the president to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB'S signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/24/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9201219
2070 E 27 Ave.
Eugene, OR 97403
February 15, 1992
President George Bush
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Bush,
You have shown that you can lead the world
in waging war, and in the process have saved the oil supply of
the United States.
Please redeem your election campaign pledge to become the
environmental president by leading the world for peaceful deve-
lopment, and save our earth's atmosphere from destruction by
man-made greenhouse gases. Because the United States is the
world's largest emitter of CO₂, we should set an example by
reducing, or at least stabilizing that emission.
Our country must be a leader, not a reluctant obstruction-
me
ist, in the critical talks on the global warming treaty and
other issues which will take place in February and March in
New York City.
I strongly urge you to join the many other world leaders
who are planning to attend the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development in Rio de Janiero June 1-12. At
that conference I hope you will be able to present a proposal
for world cooperation in greenhouse gas reduction, a proposal
of which we can be proud and for which our children and grand-
children will be grateful in the decades to come.
Yours sincerely,
Edevard B.Masorvey
Edward B. Meservey
Research Physicist (retired)
Princeton University
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201253
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
David J. Rathe
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/15/92
SUBJECT: He is writing President Bush to urge him to attend
the Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB'S signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/20/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
5/
farther
9201253
February 15, 1992
David J. Rathe Do
309 wall St
Danville PA 17821
President George Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Bush,
I write to you concerning the upcoming United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development in June. I urge
you to attend this conference of grave importance to the
world. Please commit to specific timetables for reducing
Carbon dioxide emissions and air /water pollution. Please call
for programs to curb global deforestation and provide incentives
for sustainable management of production forests.
Please become the environmental president you vowed
to be in this term and show the world and our
environment " the White House effect."
Thank you for your concern and support of our environment.
Sincerely,
Dathe a
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201249
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Bill Weir
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/15/92
SUBJECT: He is writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB'S signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document #9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/20/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
51.
Earth
Bill Weir
9201249
BILL WEIR ASSOCIATES
6904 RIDGEVIEW DRIVE
February 15, 1992
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
President George Bush
55439-1431 USA
Washington DC 20500
PHONE: (612) 751-0445
VOICE MAIL: (612) 941-5360
Dear Mr. President,
FAX: (612) 941-5360
I respectfully call upon you to live up to your promises to your
constituents regarding protection of our earth's environment for
humankind and other species. To do so, I urge that you take
certain steps promptly that will help fulfill those promises:
1) Strongly support the Renewable Energy Tax Equity Act of 1992
(Summary enclosed).
2) Adopt and proclaim an effective program for our nation's
participation in global leadership to promptly and substantially
reduce the production and emission of carbon dioxide and other
gases that are quite probably leading to a very destructive global
warming. We must shift our electric power production away from
coal, oil and nuclear fission to draw more and more from
windpower, solar-power and when ready, nuclear fusion-power.
3) Direct our federal departments and agencies to amend their
practices for purchase of electric-power and of generating
systems, first to revise specification in Requests For Proposals
so as to make competition truly fair among coal, oil, nuclear,
wind and photovoltaic sources and systems, and also to take into
account the Environmental Cost Differential among these
alternatives in determining which are chosen.
4) Take major steps to ensure much stronger US leadership toward
greater protection of our global environment, including your
personal leadership at the Earth Summit this June in Brazil.
Please respond with assurance that you will follow through on
your promises to become our "Environmental President."
Sincerely, Bill Weir
Trustee, Republican Presidential Task Force, NRSC
Co-Producer, Republican Weekly TV Series "Main Street Minnesota"
Elected Public Servant (Commissioner), Hennepin Parks Board
2/5/92
Bush Library Photocopy
Preservation
THE RENEWABLE ENERGY TAX EQUITY ACT O, 1992
A fundamental requirement for more/rapidly realizing America' tenewable CTA
potential is tax equity. The
Renewable Energy Tax Equity Act of 1992 (RETEA) would provide renewable technol
as with tax incentive options:
(1) A ten percent business energy tax credit on investments in geothermal, solar, or small-scale wind energy; or (2)
a production tax incentive of 2.5 cents per kilowatt-hout of electricity sold, rewarding investors in clean energy products
with tax benefits based solely on the actual production and sale of electricity to 1 U.S. utility. This legislation is the
most significant federal initiative that could be undertaken in support of wind and other renewable technologies.
Each renewable energy source has unique
Providing renewable tax incentives will: (1) ensure
ct
teristics and requires special provisions to more
that the federal tax code treats all energy sources
ra,
enter the marketplace. A production lax
equitably; (2) enhance energy security by reducing
intent visists only those taxpayers who generate and
dependence on foreign supplies; (3) create a more
sell eleculaty to a U.S. utility, preventing potential
reliable domestic energy supply by diversifying fuel
abuses of the tax code. This option is appropriate for
sources; (4) help maintain the balance of trade by
technologies that are close to being cost competitive
supporting U.S. exports of equipment and skills; (5)
withrcotive hnologies, such as geothermal and
create jobs renewable energy sources are more labor
large-scale Thowever, energy sources that are
intensive than conventional fuels; and (6) put the U.S.
currently more expensive or capital intensive, such 21
on record as having taken proactive steps toward
photovoltaics and small-scale residential wind, would
reducing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions.
benefit more from the business energy TAX credit Solar
thermal, while nearing cost competitiveness, still has
RETEA contains several provisions that are key to
quite high up-front capital costs, and might benefit
the success of the renewable energy industry yet are
from either option. Systems such as lolar hot water
not found in other energy tax equity legislation,
systems generate no kilowatt-hours and thus would be
including: inflation adjustment; extended qualification
entirely excluded by a production credit alone. Specific
periods; and a phase-out of production credit with
provisions have been include in RETEA to ensure
increased market prices.
that both credits cannot be received simultaneously.
Production incentives will protect taxpayers by
Conventional sources of energy coal, oil, gas, and
providing a tax credit only when electricity is generated
nuclear receive special incentives such as fuel
and sold to a utility Regardless of the tire of
expensing, artificial liability limits (through the Price-
investment, if 8 project doesn't generate electricity to
Anderson Act), resource depletion allowances,
the anticipated standards, it does not receive the same
exploration incentives, exemption from the alternative
credit. Structured properly, the option of energy tax
minimum tax, minimum price controls, or intangible
credit or production incentive successfully addresses the
drilling expenses. In comparison, the current
needs of the entire renewable energy field, while
investment tax credit for renewables only applies to
creating greater equity in the energy tax code. If you
solar and geothermal, and rewards investment rather
would like more information on RETEA, contact
than the actual production of energy. Wind energy tax
Michael Marvin at (202) 408-8988.
credits were discontinued in 1985.
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201155
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
ALLMAN, MARY
TO:
PRESIDENT BUSH
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/14/92
SUBJECT: HE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SUMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9201155
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Ms. Allman:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 14, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - Ms. Allman
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 -- over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - - Ms. Allman
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forwardi the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED - results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
DAnan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Ms. Mary A. Allman
17500 Buehler Road
Olney, Maryland 20832
14 February 1992
President George Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington DC 20500-0002
Dear Mr. President:
It is fitting to write you today, the day we celebrate love. If you love the Earth, then lead your people, and the world,
in saving our global environment. Take a strong leadership role in encouraging environmental protection.
Specifically,
(a)
Support a global warming treaty to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other ozone-destroying gases.
From February 18 through 28, the negotiating team of world leaders is meeting in New York City to put
the finishing touches on this treaty. Your administration should have a strong voice there.
(b)
Agree to a ban on the international trafficking of toxic waste, and
(c)
Commit to attending UNCED in June 1992. This UN Conference on Environment and Development could
bring the nations of the world together to stop global warming and achieve a safe home for countless
generations. Let it not be said that the United States, a major consumer of the earth's resources, did not
have the vision nor the commitment to protect our imperiled global environment.
It is disturbing, to say the least, to hear that:
- The U,S, is the only industrialized nation unwilling to sign a global warming treaty which would set
targets and timetables for reducing the emission of greenhouse gases;
- The U.S. is the only country unwilling to consider a ban on trafficking of toxic wastes, allowing richer
industrialized nations to dump their wastes in poorer developing countries;
- You have not yet committed to attend the UNCED meeting in Brazil, signalling to other nations that
environmental protection is not a top priority for the U.S. government. (Yes, the world's citizens are reading
your lips.)
Mr. President, please help make UNCED a success. It may be our last opportunity in this Century to sign a
global warming treaty and make progress towards controlling environmental disasters.
Sincerely yours,
Mary a. Allwan
17500 BUELHER ROAD
OLNEY MD 20832
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201238
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
John A. Satterwhite D.D.S.
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/14/92
SUBJECT: He is writing to urge the President to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB'S signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document #9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/19/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9201238
John A. Satterwhite D.D.S.
605 Peterson Dr.
Phillips, Wi. 54555
715-339-3021
February 14, 1992
President George Bush
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear President Bush,
I do not understand why you are not having the U.S.
participate in the final treaty negotiations in preparation
for the "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro this June.
The world looks to the U.S. as a leader let's act like a
leader and set policies for the world to follow.
I strongly urge that you make a commitment to a global
warming treaty that requires a 20% cut in greenhouse gas
emissions by the year 2000.
Sincerely,
John a. John A. Satterwhite D.D.S Sattindale was
JAS/as
"Document Control for Division of Life Sciences"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9200451
ORIGINATOR: 02
STATUS I
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
DICKINSON, William L.: U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TO:
DR. D.A. BROMLEY
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/13/92
SUBJECT: HE IS FORWARDING INFORMATION REGARDING MR. ANDREW
GRINSTEAD III WHO WISHES TO BE SELECTED TO CONSULT
WITH THE FCCSET SUBCOMMITTEE ON BIOTECHNOLOGY
RESEARCH.
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED: LIFE SCIENCES
ASSIGNED: Rachel E. Levinson
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED: FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE/
ACTION: Bromley Sign/Necessary Acti
AS NECESSARY
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
02/19/92
STAFF DUE DATE
02/19/92
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 02/20/92
COPIES TO: D. Allan Bromley
Carl Bretscher
Damar Hawkins
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
hay
REMARKS:
OSTP RECEIVED: 02/13/92
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/14/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506
February 20, 1992
Dear Congressman Dickinson:
Mr. Calio referred your February 3 letter regarding Mr. E. Andrews Grinstead to my office
for reply. We are pleased that Mr. Grinstead has indicated his interest in the President's
National Biotechnology Research Initiative. As a highlighted component of the President's
Fiscal Year 1993 Budget, the Biotechnology Research Initiative demonstrates the
Administration's commitment to fostering U.S. leadership in this rapidly growing field, of
which Mr. Grinstead's company, Hybridon, is a part. We will send Mr. Grinstead a copy
of the report, Biotechnology for the 21st Century, with an invitation for him to provide
comments.
Thank you for transmitting Mr. Grinstead's letter.
Sincerely yours,
DANAN D. Allan Bromley Samby
Director
cc: Mr. Grinstead
Mr. Calio
The Honorable William L. Dickinson
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506
February 20, 1992
Dear Mr. Grinstead:
Your note to Congressman Dickinson regarding your interest in the President's National
Biotechnology Research Initiative has been sent to me for response. Your letter indicates
that announcements of the launching of this important effort are having the desired effect.
That is, to send a strong message that the President is committed to maintaining our
current global leadership position in biotechnology. This commitment recognizes the
critical role of biotechnology in our nation's future technological strength, economic growth,
and the health and quality of life of its people. However, the returns on this investment
cannot be realized without the participation of companies such as Hybridon. Therefore, we
are very pleased that you have indicated your willingness to provide your reflections and
comments on the work of the Biotechnology Research Subcommittee of the Committee on
Life Sciences and Health, Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and
Technology.
We have enclosed a copy of the report, Biotechnology for the 21st Century, published as a
part of the President's Fiscal Year 1993 Budget. Any comments that you might wish to
provide would be very much appreciated.
Again, we thank you for your interest and attention.
Sincerely yours,
D. Allan Bromley
Director
Enclosure
cc: The Honorable William L. Dickinson
Mr. E. Andrews Grinstead
Chairman of the Board and CEO
Hybridon Inc.
One Innovation Drive
Worcester, Massachusetts 01605
Biotechnology for the 21st Century
A Report by the
FCCSET Committee
on Life Sciences
and Health
February 1992
FY 1993
0451 A
THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE
REFERRAL
RECEIVED
13,2 1992 9
TO: OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
OSTP
MAIL ROOM
ACTION REQUESTED:
APPROPRIATE ACTION
DESCRIPTION OF INCOMING:
ID:
305077
MEDIA: LETTER, DATED FEBRUARY 3, 1992
TO:
NICK CALIO
FROM:
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM L. DICKINSON
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
WASHINGTON DC 20515
SUBJECT: FORWARDS INFORMATION REGARDING MR. ANDREW
GRINSTEAD III WHO WISHES TO BE SELECTED
TO CONSULT WITH THE FCCSET SUBCOMMITTEE ON
BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH
PROMPT ACTION IS ESSENTIAL - IF REQUIRED ACTION HAS NOT BEEN
TAKEN WITHIN 9 WORKING DAYS OF RECEIPT, PLEASE TELEPHONE THE
UNDERSIGNED AT 456-7486.
RETURN CORRESPONDENCE, WORKSHEET AND COPY OF RESPONSE
(OR DRAFT) TO:
AGENCY LIAISON, ROOM 91, THE WHITE HOUSE, 20500
SALLY KELLEY
DIRECTOR OF AGENCY LIAISON
PRESIDENTIAL CORRESPONDENCE
5H.
ID# 305077
THE WHITE HOUSE
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
INCOMING
PE
DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY 04, 1992
NAME OF CORRESPONDENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM L. DICKINSON
SUBJECT: FORWARDS INFORMATION REGARDING MR. ANDREW
GRINSTEAD III WHO WISHES TO BE SELECTED
TO CONSULT WITH THE FCCSET SUBCOMMITTEE ON
BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH
ACTION
DISPOSITION
ROUTE TO:
ACT
DATE
TYPE C COMPLETED
OFFICE/AGENCY
(STAFF NAME)
CODE YY/MM/DD
RESP
D YY/MM/DD
NICK CALIO
ORG 92/02/04 NCA 9210205
1990STP
REFERRAL NOTE:
CA 92/02/102
/ /
REFERRAL NOTE:
PPBULL
REFERRAL NOTE:
I 920219
/ /
€J
/ /
/ /
REFERRAL NOTE:
/ /
/ /
REFERRAL NOTE:
COMMENTS:
ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENTS:
MEDIA:L INDIVIDUAL CODES: 1240
MAIL
USER CODES: (A)
(B)
(C)
*ACTION CODES:
*DISPOSITION
*OUTGOING
*
*
*
*CORRESPONDENCE:
*
*A-APPROPRIATE ACTION
*A-ANSWERED
*TYPE RESP=INITIALS
*
*C-COMMENT/RECOM
*B-NON-SPEC-REFERRAL
*
OF SIGNER *
*D-DRAFT RESPONSE
*C-COMPLETED
*
CODE = A
*
*F-FURNISH FACT SHEET *S-SUSPENDED
*COMPLETED = DATE OF *
*I-INFO COPY/NO ACT NEC*
*
OUTGOING *
*R-DIRECT REPLY W/COPY *
*
*
*S-FOR-SIGNATURE
*
*
*
*X-INTERIM REPLY
*
*
*
REFER QUESTIONS AND ROUTING UPDATES TO CENTRAL REFERENCE
(ROOM 75, OEOB) EXT-2590
KEEP THIS WORKSHEET ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL INCOMING
LETTER AT ALL TIMES AND SEND COMPLETED RECORD TO RECORDS
MANAGEMENT.
February 5, 1992
Dear Bill:
Thank you for your recent letter regarding Mr. Andrew
Grinstead's interest in consulting with the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy on
biotechnology research.
We appreciate being advised of Mr. Grinstead's interest
in this regard. In an effort to be of assistance, I have
shared your correspondence with the appropriate
Presidential advisors for their review and consideration.
Thank you again for your interest in writing.
With best regards,
Sincerely,
Nicholas E. Calio
Assistant to the President
for Legislative Affairs
The Honorable William L. Dickinson
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
NEC:JHH:
bcc: w/ copy of inc to Office of Science and
Technology Policy - for appropriate action
bcc: w/ copy of inc to Office of Presidential
Personnel - FYI
WILLIAM L. DICKINSON
DISTRICT OFFICES:
2D DISTRICT, ALABAMA
ROOM 301 FEDERAL COURT BUILDING
15 LEE STREET
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
PHONE: AREA CODE (205) 223-7292
2406 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
MONTGOMERY, AL 36104
PHONE: AREA CODE (202) 225-2901
Congress of the United States
FEDERAL BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515-0102
100 WEST TROY STREET
house of Representatives
PHONE: AREA CODE (205) 794-9680
DOTHAN, AL 36303
2D DISTRICT COUNTIES:
BARBOUR
CRENSHAW
Mashington, DC 20515-0102
CITY HALL BUILDING
BULLOCK
DALE
MAIN STREET
BUTLER
GENEVA
PHONE: AREA CODE (205) 493-9253
COFFEE
HENRY
OPP, AL 36467
CONECUH
HOUSTON
COVINGTON
February 3, 1992
MONTGOMERY
COMMITTEES:
PIKE
ARMED SERVICES
Malis
HOUSE ADMINISTRATION
Mr. Nick Calio
Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. Calio:
Enclosed please find information concerning Mr. Andrew Grinstead,
III, who wishes to consult with the FCCSET subcommittee on
biotechnology research.
Please bring Mr. Grinstead's request to the attention of the
biotechnology research subcommittee of the Federal Coordinating
Council on Science, Engineering & Technology at the White House
Office on Science and Technology Policy.
Thank you for your efforts on Mr. Grinstead's behalf.
Sincerely yours,
Bill
WM. L. DICKINSON
WLD/Ip
WILLIAMSON AND WILLIAMSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
GREENVILLE. ALABAMA 36037-0467
W. J. WILLUMSON
P.O. Box 467
J. MEOOWAY WILLIAMSON
Telephone Are 205-382-2635
WARREN J. WILLIAMSON, JR
January 29, 1992
FAX 205-382-2625
Attached is an article in the Biotechnology Daily Newspaper,
"Bioworld Today" relating to a biotech initiative by the
Administration.
Attached is a copy of a fax received today from E. Andrews
(Andy) Grinstead, III, the son-in-law of W. Jack Williamson,
Grecnville, Alabama. This fax shows the business name, telephone
and fax number for Mr. Grinstead.
Attached is an article copied from the Boston Sunday Telegram
or October 27, 1991 which gives you the information concerning Andy
Grinstead.
Tell the Congressman that Andy Grinstead is the son Admiral
E. A. Grinstead, who is now retired but at his retirement was Chief
of Supply for the Armed Forces. I am sure the Congressman met him
as he has testified many times before the House Armed Services
Committee.
Andy Crinstead is now the Chairman of the Board and CEO of two
health-care companies. Hybridon Inc. is one and Gensis the other.
Notice that these are put together by venture capital arm of
Harvard Medical School.
Andy Grinstead is 46 years of age, a graduate of Harvard
Undergraduate School and of Harvard Business School. After
graduation from Harvard Business School, he went to work for Eli
Lilly and Company of Indianapolis. In the course of this
employment he served as their director in Iran and their director
in Venezuela. Then later he returned to the home office in
Indianapolis and was placed in charge of all new acquisitions of
medical products companies. Then he went to Wall Street and served
as an investment banker with Kidder, Peabody & Company Inc. and
later with PaineWebber Inc. - all in the medical technology field.
Late in 1991 he was employed through Medical Science Partners
to be Chairman of the Board and CEO of these two companies
specializing in anti-sense technology and other new genetic
discoveries in the health-care field.
He would be a natural to consult with the FCCSET Subcommittee
on biotechnology research.
Anything you can do to get his name before this group would
be appreciated.
01/28/08
09:41
BIT 277 0113
MEDICAL SCI PTRS NEISS
001/003
B1/27/02 28120114 *** DELIVER TO
017
ET
8115
Domie
ihorps
Page
1
BIOWO TODAY
TURROAY
Live 11. 1881
THE MILY BIOTHOM
LOGY
NEWSPART
Vou 1 No.
PAMILY
Amylin Receives
Bush To Discuss Blotech Initiative
WASHINGTON - The White House announced on
First Patent Noti
Monday that President Bush will unvell a blotechnol.
agy research Initiative and four other federal R&D
Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. has (scelved notice of
Initiatives in the State of the Union Address tonight.
allowance on Its Arst patent, covering composition of
The blosech Initiative was crafted by the blotech-:
the company's flagship hormone amylin, the San
nology research subcommittes of the Federal Coordi-
company announced Monday.
nating Council on Science, Engineering and Technol-
The company (NASDAQ:AMLN), which
ogv. FCCSET is part of the White House Office on
loping
therapeutics for diaberes based on
Science and Technology Policy.
more. said
the patent will also cover formula 13 of amylin th
The White llouse did not provide any Information
Include Insulin,
about the contents of the Initiative. FCCSET spokes.
The claims will cover use of amviin replace
man also declined to provide details.
11
therapy for reducing the risk of low blo
In addition to the biotech initiative. Bush will an.
case,
which is associated with the diabates
begins In
hounce initiatives In advanced materials and processing:
childhood. Amylin, which is In
period, also
high performance computing and communications: sio-
announced that 11 has been cleared tart elinical trial
bal change research; and meth and science education.
of & synthetic amylin preparation.
- Stave Usdin
Amylin balievas an excess of the pancreati
mone leads to obesity, deposits of amylou
the
pancreas and the Insulin rasistance that chi
tion
udias
have
1
wn
that
orizes
aleve
d lavals of In
adult-onset or type II diabetes. It Is also
Peloping
bloo protein fibrin an can predict
art attacks and
amylin and amylin agonists for use
stro
1.
&
I&T TYPE I
insulin-dependent diabetes.
S shares fell tents to $12.25
Monday.
B
The company has an agreement with Claxe Inc. 10
rington orts Profital
Year
co-develop amylin blockers us potential therapies.
Amylin, which has filed or acquired more than 30
Earrington profitable Laboral las Inc. on Monday ported its
U.S. patent applications, last week completed Its Initial
public offering and saw its shares Jump nearly 50
net income of 31. billien, or 14 cents sin hare, 1983, on
year
the company went
parcent above 122 IPO price of $14. The stock closed up
vanues of $15.4 milli for the waar ended N 30.
$1.63 to 523 on Monday,
In 1990, the Inving, las, company (AMEX. CRN) lost
16.1 million, or or cents par share, on ravanues of
Yamanouohl To Bell ABS Test Kits
811.6 million.
American Biogenetic Sciences Inc. on Monday said It
Carrington share: desed 21 $19.58, UP 13 cants.
has signed an exclusive 15 year agreement under which
The launch of three new products and continued
ramanouchi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. will market rest
growth in the wound. and skin-care line Increased Pav.
containing ARS' moneslenal antibody. is Abringgen,
anuas, according to the company, whose products are
The Japaness sumpany will limks Issitial person of
based on s naturally occurring carbohydrate molecule.
$1 million. The Notre Dame, Ind., company
Reduction 111 the LUST of goods SLAU, KD well UI subsider
(NASDAQ:MABXA) also will retain all manufacturing
tially reduced operating expenses, boosted net income.
rights and receive royalties on sule of kitx containing
For the fourth quarter, Carrington had net income of
the antibody. 45% In Japan and Taiwan.
$423,000, or 5 cants per share, on revenues of $4.3
45% which Is Abrinogen specific, 11 Intended for was
million. For the 1980 quarter. net loss was $3 million.
or 48 cants per share, on revenwes of 53.3 million. .
Far BloWorld Customer Senice, of 1-800-879-8790, in Japan al COMUNE International Carp. 03-3770-5501.
trademarks Maise a M401. Telephone (410) in (11/12) mun; washington sureau can 642.7431. and Lowers South I
San Todayois published every business day by le Publishing Inc. President and Publisher, Savid Bunnet. Mikerbi and business effices: 217
THE WRITTEN CONSENT of D. To subscribe or is aboin photocopying rights. please as Subscripdors X 800-879-8750.
of to Publishing Inc. Copyright c 189030 Publishing Inc N lights NO PART OF THE RELICATION MAY и INSTRUCED Today WITHOUT are
2.d
2001 252 803 DNI WaDE:E0 26, 62 NYI
XXXX
HYBRIDON
FAX
Hybridun, Inc.
One Innovation Drive
Worcester, MA 01605
(508) 752-7000
Fax: (508) 752-7001
Hybridon Fax
TO:
Jack Williamson
FAX #:
205-382-2625
DATE:
January 28, 1992
FROM:
Dana Miller for Andy Grinstead
# OF PAGES:
1
(to follow)
MESSAGE:
Do you have any ideas on how I can get involved in this? Please lei me know.
Thanks,
Andy
If this transmission is not legible, please call Hybridon at (508) 752-7000. Our FAX
number is (508) 752-7001. Thank you
1
I'd
1022 252 B2S DNI W852:E0 26. 82 NSI
SUNDAY TELEGRAM. OCTOBER 27. 1991 E1
Killing
the
Messenger
Hybridon drug targets AIDS;
investors call in big guns
By Paul P. Heldman
Staff Reporter
Andrews Grinstead III
The company's scientific
The directors decided à change
spent the 1980s searching
founder, Dr. Paul C Zamecnik of
was essendal so the timetables for
for the smartest technolo-
the Slirewsbury-based Worcester
financing and for development of
gies and best-russ compa-
Foundation for Experimental Biol-
pharmaceuticals could be met,
nies and then raising money for
ogy, is a pioneer in anti-sense tech-
Pederson. Hybridon director,
them
nology.
said last week
Hc then embarked on a 10 month
Grlustead, who became Пубгі-
Last June, as the level of dissatis-
hunt for technology that will be
don chairman and chief executive
faction with the Webb team rose,
"critical in drug discovery in the
in August, is 2 former investment
Pederson met with Grinstead and
next century."
banker who helped raise millions
Nelss.
of dollars for financing and merg-
Hic quest landed him in Worces.
At the time. they were in the
ing health care companies. "He
ter.
midst of planning a biotechnology
has an enormous network of peo-
startup that would focus on anti-
The former investment banker
ple in both the financial communi-
sense technology and be based in
and drug company executive is
ty and the research community,"
San Diego. A corporate recruiter
now charged with cpurring the
said Albert A Holman III, a former
Grinstead colleagne and managing
arranged a meeting with Medical
growth of Hybridon Inc., & 19-
Science Partners, the Brookline-
month-old biotechnology company
director at Kidder, Peabody & Co.
Inc
based venture capital arm of Har.
that already has scrapped its first
vard Medical School and HyDri-
management team
And Hybridon's new prest-
don's major investor.
Grinstead, the leader of manage-
dent, Dr. Edward S. Neiss. oversew
Grinstead said he and Neiss resi-
ment team No. 2, now faces the for-
bringing numerous drugs from the
ized Hybridon contained every.
midable task of transforming Шу-
research phase to the market while
bridon into something other than
affiliated with several major
thing they wanted in their startup
just another biotech company
health-care organizations.
- and more: a founding scientist
struggling w raise more money
who is я pioneer in the field; and
This company is at the thresh-
than it burns while working on the
backing from a venture capital firm
miracle cure
old of whether It's going to be good
with worldwide Onancial and sci-
or great," Grinstead said recently
entific contacts "The finest net-
He and his team boast some ad-
from Hybridon's offices in the city's
work I've ever seen," Grinstead
vantages:
biotechnology park
said.
Пybridon was founded to de-
'NO SECRET'
Grinstead and Neiss, in turn,
velop one of the handful of techno.
Its quest for greatness was inter-
give Hybridon 2 potent force of 11-
logies truly considered cutting
rupted last summer with the depar-
nancial prowess and drug develop.
edge- Anti-sense drugs have the w
ture of the company's first chair-
tential to kill the messengers of
ment expertise. Pederson said.
AIDS Alzheimer's and other dis.
wall and chief executive, Nigel L
Webb. It was "no secret" that Hy.
"We couldn't have gone to a
assos. The bio questions are: Can it
1..
bridon's directors had been disap-
drawing board and designed a bei-
with ... AT
attille."
he
sain
acne
the first management Leam. accord.
With the transition W 06" 1880
ing to Thoru Pederson. president
ership completed. Grinstead now
and scientific director of the Wur-
plans to accolerate grouth of the
cester Foundation. which OVERS 12
company the previous management
percent of Hytridon
Dr. Jinyan Teng. senior research colontial at Hybridon, works in Use laboratory.
DAM GULLU
put on the map. Grinstead said the
company hopes to more than triplc
Aboest to such a forest of wealth
its ranks to 60 employees over the
is crucial during the period before
BETTER ooDs
next 12 to 18 months And Hybri.
a company tries to raise moncy
But anti-sense technology has
don will close a private placement
through the stock market
better odds, Grinstead said. He
in November that will raise so mil-
"The most vulnerable time for
says the technology is akin to find-
lion.
these emerging growth companies
ing the right key for 8 lock
The pursuit of worldwide capital
is the time they're dependent on
private capital," Grinstead said.
The genetic code for producing
to fund its research was in progress
proteins that make up a virus is the
on a recent morning in Hybridon's
By June. Hybridon hopes to have
13,000 square feet of office and lab
lock The anti-sense drug is the key
filed an application with the feder
that fits snugly Into the gene's mes.
space. Executives briefed a Japa.
uese investment banker and the
x] government to start testing its
senger and turns off Its ability to
anti-sense AIDS drug in humans
cart the production plans of dis-
president of a Norwegian venture
fund management firm
The company will then be in 8 posi-
ease-causing viruses.
tion to go public, Grinstead said.
Both visitors are connected to
"Anti-sense is constructing keys
WORTHY INVESTMENT
Hybridon through Medical Science
that almost by definition can only
He has spent a lot of time on the
at a specific lock" he said
Partners and boast strong contacts
in the health-care industry - an
other side of such transactions, as-
As scientists crack the genetic
indication of the wide neticast by
sisting companies in convincing
code for each of these viruses and
the Bmokline venture capital com
large investors that a technology is
diseases, companies such as Hybri-
pany.
worthy of their money.
FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE
"Andy's a talker," said James G.
don should be able to capitalize on
Groninger. who worked with Grin-
every new genetic blucprint that
Fredrik C. Schreuder, president
stead at Kidder, Peabody & Co and
emerges from the laboratory.
of an Osla-based medical venture
is now managing director at
He sees it as the opening up of
management company. not only
PaineWebber Inc. in Boston.
provided links to European courc-
the American West, a manifest des.
es of capital, but also put Hybridon
"But he is the most tenacious guy
tiny in a pharmaccutical world
in touch with an Oslo-based cancer
that I've seen in the investment
once restrained by its inability to
banking business and I have been
crack the code.
research center that Hybridon is
now collaborating with. He said he
in it over 20 years. He is absolutely
"Theoretically any good anti-
strength of Hisbridon's
Cotting Usbridon's products to
dozch drugs. he said "If YOU told
tal ffisnsa
me
market is still I distant prospeat
some
group
hour
Grinstead said the investors as.
But Grinstead believes the technol-
jump," hc said, "the only question J
sociated
it), Medical Science
ogy promises 2 long-term payoff.
would ask is which direction did
Partners have the resources to par
"The history of drugs has been a
they head in"
ticipate in morc than one round of
blind search for chemicals that
financing "All our investors last
have some activity." hc said "It's
like huge oak trees with rool: hr
like looking for a needle in a have
Anti-sense drug strategy
New AIDS
Viral RNA
messenger injected
strand
by AIDS virus
creates
AIDS
virit
Recedior X
entryport
ce
Viral ONA
AIDS viral
messenger
DNA strand
sense strand
How it works
DNA is configured as two Inter
creates
twined strands called "sense
and *anti-sense In each 0011
small portions of DNA are copied
and transcribed Into "messenger
RNA, which acts as the memory
AIUS virus
for carrying out the task of making
protcins
protein. the essential material in
living cells.
AIUS enters the numan cell
through 8 receptor. injecting viral
RNA that creates a new AIDS viral
DNA strand. In turn. new AIDS
virus DNA makes messenger
RNA. which carries out the task
01 making proteins associated
with AIDS.
No
protein
Enter Hybridon's anti-sense drug.
which binds 10 the viral RNA, mes-
senger RNA strand and blocks
the transfer of the message for
making proteins associated with
AIDS. The cell remains unharmed.
Source: Hybridon
Nucleus
Anti-sense
drug
ROB WELSMAN
"Document Control"
TYPE:
PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201141
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Halsey, Dorothy
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/12/92
SUBJECT: SHE IS WRITING TO URGE THE PRESIDENT TO ATTEND THE
EARTH SUMMIT (UNCED) IN RIO DE JANEIRO
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: DRAFT FOR DAB'S SIGNATURE
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: DAB SIGNED LETTER
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 03/13/92
FILE: P-EOP-PRESIDENTIAL PRIORITY
CENTRAL FILES:
9261141
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 2, 1992
Dear Ms. Halsey:
On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your comments and suggestions
about global environmental issues and the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). The President appreciates your
concerns and has asked that I respond to your letter of February 12, 1992
regarding these issues.
The United States, under President Bush's leadership, is aggressively
pursuing international efforts to address problems related to climate change,
ozone depletion, forests, oceans, biological diversity, and technology
cooperation with developing countries. The Administration has put forward
specific proposals in various international fora to address each of these
questions. More important, the United States is already taking specific steps
here at home, through both legislation and administrative action, to begin
tackling these problems.
Specifically regarding climate change, you may be pleased to know that the
United States has already begun taking actions that will have the effect of
reducing net emissions of greenhouse gases. These include:
*
President Bush proposed and signed into law the 1990 Clean
Air Act, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
utility sector through restrictions on utility air pollutants;
*
The Bush Administration has proposed, both through the
National Energy Strategy and through various regulatory
measures, to improve energy efficiency in power generation and
transmission, buildings, appliances, lighting, and
transportation, which will restrain related carbon dioxide
emissions;
*
The President has proposed, through his tree planting
initiatives, to increase the acreage and to improve the
management of forests, which act as greenhouse gas "sinks";
*
The President has proposed to expand the use of renewable and
low-emission fuel sources;
Page 2 - Ms. Halsey
*
Since President Bush took office, he has doubled funding for
conservation research and development (R&D) and increased
funding for renewable R&D by 69 percent; and
*
The Administration has not only proposed, but the President
has signed into law, the phaseout of ozone-depleting
compounds that are also greenhouse gases.
Additionally, in February 1992, in response to new scientific evidence,
President Bush was the first head of state to commit his country unilaterally
to accelerating the date for the complete phaseout of the production of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The President's action moves up the phaseout
date of CFCs, which deplete the Earth's ozone layer, to December 31, 1995.
Due to a number of previous Administration actions, U.S. production of
ozone-depleting substances is already more than 40 percent below levels
allowed by the internationally agreed Montreal Protocol. Under the new
schedule, the U.S. will eliminate production four years ahead of the current
international deadline, thus continuing the record of U.S. leadership in this
area extending back to the mid-1970s.
The United States supports a comprehensive approach, addressing all
greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide, and "sinks," such as forests.
Focusing exclusively on carbon dioxide emissions, as some have proposed, is
an inadequate response.
The United States has committed $25 million to assist developing countries
in planning to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change. The U.S. has
stepped up its own climate action plan, first outlined in February 1991,
including actions in such areas as energy efficiency, transportation, reduced
emission supply technologies, agriculture, natural resources, and technology
R&D. The United States has also committed $50 million to the core fund of
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and $150 million in parallel financing
through the U.S. Agency for International Development. In addition to
addressing global climate change, the GEF also funds projects concerning
biodiversity, international waters, and ozone.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program is the world's largest such
program and thus provides much of the scientific foundation for international
agreements on climate change and ozone depletion. The Bush Administration
has invested $2.6 billion in global change research, far more than any other
country, with an additional $1.3 billion proposed for year 1993 -- over six
times the fiscal 1989 level. Research on the scientific and economic aspects
Page 3 - Ms. Halsey
of global climate change will enable policy makers to make better judgments
about potential impacts and policy actions.
Regarding the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED), scheduled this June in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, President Bush is
committed to achieving international agreement on a framework convention
on climate change. In addition to a global agreement on climate change, the
Bush Administration also hopes UNCED will produce strategies and specific
initiatives to improve conservation of forests, oceans, and biological diversity,
and to increase technology cooperation with developing countries. You can
be sure that the United States will be well represented at the conference.
As we move forward into the 1990s, the United States will continue to address
global environmental challenges within a context of expanding economic
opportunities for all the world's people. The United States wants concrete,
practical results from UNCED -- results that will guide future action on the
full range of environmental and developmental issues.
Thank you for taking the time to express your interest on these environmental
issues with President Bush. You can be sure that the President will continue
working with other nations to obtain global solutions to these challenging
issues.
With the President's best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
D.Anan Bramley
D. Allan Bromley
The Assistant to the President
for
Science and Technology
Ms. Dorothy K. Halsey
United Nations Association of the United States of America
Cape Cod and Islands Chapter
69 Horizon Drive
Chatham, Massachusetts 02633
UNA-USA
UNCED
UNA
USA
CAPE COD AND ISLANDS CHAPTER
UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
February 12, 1992
President George W. Bush
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear President Bush:
The Board of Directors of the Cape and Islands Chapter of the United Nations
Association has asked me to request your support of the United Nations Conference
on Environment and Development in June 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
We applauded your statement proclaiming United Nations Day 1991 in which you
restated US support for international efforts to protect the environment.
Your personal attendance at the conference in Brazil would be of the greatest
importance in ensuring the success of the conference.
We urge your support for a global warming treaty to cut emissions of carbon
dioxide and other ozone-destroying gases, as well as a ban on the international
trafficking of toxic waste.
Without your strong leadership, we believe that the conference will have
little hope of success.
Sincerely,
Dorothy K. Halsey
69 Horizon Drive
Chatham, Ma. 02633
Governmental Relations Chairman
UNA-USA is a non-partisan, privately-supported research and education organization composed of individual members, chapters and a Council of Member
Organizations. Its Þurpose is to study and promote the fundamental bases of peace with justice and the international organizations necessary for their development.
"Document Control"
TYPE:
Presidential Priority
DOCUMENT NUMBER: 9201255
ORIGINATOR: 05
STATUS
DIRECTORATE STATUS C
FROM:
Mary M. Long
TO:
President Bush
DATE OF
CORRESPONDENCE: 02/12/92
SUBJECT: She is writing to urge President Bush to attend the
Earth Summit (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
DIRECTORATE
STAFF
ASSIGNED:
ASSIGNED: Nancy Maynard
ACTION
STAFF
REQUIRED:
ACTION: Draft for DAB'S signature
SENDER'S DUE DATE:
OSTP DUE DATE:
STAFF DUE DATE
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE COMPLETED/DEPT: 04/02/92
COPIES TO:
WHITE HOUSE TRACKING #:
CONTACT PERSON:
PHONE:
EXT:
REMARKS: See response on document number 9201148
OSTP RECEIVED:
DEPT RECEIVED: 02/20/92
FILE:
CENTRAL FILES:
51
Garyls
UNA-USA
USA
ATLANTA CHAPTER
9201255
UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION
of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OFFICERS
President
February 12, 1992
Pat Bevis
Vice President,
Program
Mary Long
President George Bush:
Vice President,
Membership
Loretta Garcia
you are doing a fine job as
Treasurer
Bob Sheppard
presedent of all cityens of the United
Secretary
Anne Kurtzahn
states - no small task when we all
Historian
Gerry Crocker
Finance Chair
have multiple ideas of how you should
Newton Long
Liaison
Bernice Smith
he doing it.
Public Relations
Susan Weldon Collins
Nominating
Roberta Cox
personally attend the Earth summit in
One small suggestion: you
Committee Chair
Board of Directors
Jane Branch
Hubert Cobb
Marie Copher
Rio de Janew this spring for us,
John Diehl
Fran Dykes
Pat Evans
Steve Hochman
for your resolution to he the environmental other
Leah Janus
Sam Laird
Elaine La Londe
president, and to give a charge to
Larry Noble
Ted Spetnagel
Bob Stewart
nations that our glote is a precious gift
Sandy Teepen
Immediate
Past President
Rob Townes
Sincerely many M. Long UP
United nations assn- allenta
P.O. Box 941514
Atlanta, GA 30341