Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

This file contains material prepared for his sessions with the press.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
7284912
label
Dunlop, John (2)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
7284912
contentType
document
title
Dunlop, John (2)
description
This file contains material prepared for his sessions with the press.
collections
Richard B. Cheney Files
Richard Cheney's General Subject Files
subjects
Vietnam (Republic)
Construction industry
Labor
Refugees
Unemployment
Vietnamese Americans
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
7284912
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-05-31
month
5
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1975-01-01
month
1
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
c38fea0b6978e2c7
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 3, folder "Dunlop, John (2)" of the Richard B. Cheney Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 3 of the Richard B. Cheney Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 6 4-23-75 JTD The Labor Force and Labor Problems in Europe, 1920-1970 (Excerpted from a Manuscript by Walter Galenson*) A history of European labor market developments from 1920 to 1970 is divided logically into two periods. The first twenty years, from the Treaty of Versailles to the outbreak of World War II, were characterized by little, if any, economic growth; chronic unemployment; and a pattern of industrial relations that may better be described as industrial warfare. With the exception of Great Britain and the Northern fringe of countries, trade unions fared poorly in this environment and their allied labor parties succumbed one by one to forces of fascism. Following the end of the war and the exigencies of reconstruction, the 1950's witnessed a rapid revival of the idea of social democracy, and within a relatively short time the welfare state had spread from its Scandinavian stronghold to a good part of Europe. Except for the Iberian Peninsula, the Balkans, and Eastern Europe, the other Nations of Europe experienced an upsurge of trade union organization and activity and the evolution of orderly systems of collective bargaining. The unprecedented rate of economic growth was a major contributor to these developments. The labor problems during this period, however, took on quite a different character. Inflation replaced unemployment as the paramount concern of the labor market. Collective bargaining became firmly established as the method by which wages and other labor condi- tions were determined. Political parties of the left greatly increased their parliamentary representation and, in most countries, attained a degree of political power. The scope of this paper is limited to selected labor problems in the four major industrial powers - France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom - plus Sweden as representative of Scandinavia and an exemplar of the social democratic welfare state. *Professor of Economics, Cornell University FGRD & LIBRARY GERAID 1. The Economic Background The records of pre and post World War II European growth are so different that it is scarcely possible to believe the same continent is involved. For the prewar years there was, at best, low growth followed by the Great Depression. Sweden was the best performer of the five European countries with a national income increase of almost 75 percent. The other countries showed substantially lower growth. The postwar picture was completely different. Only Britain failed to at least double its national product, while in the case of Germany, the national product was more than tripled over a 20-year period. One point that might be made here is that it is obviously much easier to maintain social harmony, an essential ingredient for good industrial relations, against a background of satisfactory economic growth. This does not mean that there will not be controversy among social groups over the distribution of income, but the controversy is apt to be much less bitter when all incomes are rising. However, the mitigation of social strife is not necessarily a direct function of the level of national income. Although it is true that absolute living standards were higher after than before the war, this was probably of less importance to the establishment of a good economic base for industrial relations than the fact that living standards were increasing at a steady and substantial rate. When this rate slackened, trouble developed. For the prewar decades, only Sweden had a substantial increase in real wages, coming before 1930. German and French workers had little improvement in two decades, and the British record was not good. The postwar years were another matter. For four of the five countries, real wages more than doubled from 1950 to 1970. Even in Britain, which lagged behind the others, there was at least a steady improvement. These two comparisons suggest that the entire quality of economic life changed after World War II. It is some times argued that the addiction of American trade unions to the method of collective bargain- ing owes a great deal to the steady rise of real wages in the United States for a century, interrupted only very briefly during the worst years of the Great Depression. This may help to explain why European unions in some degree tended to turn from political action to collective bargaining after the war. -2- SERALD FORD 2. The Labor Force Wages are only part of the story and perhaps not the most important part. The insecurity of employment contributed greatly to interwar tensions. Here again, the remarkably high levels of employment in postwar Europe stand in marked contrast to the heavy unemployment that prevailed between the wars. If one examines the population data for the years 1920-1940, two notable facts emerge. The first is the extraordinarily low growth of the population of working age in France. The second is the sub- stantial increase in the labor supply for the rest of the countries. Apart from France, the availability of labor would not have been a constraint on economic growth. It is clear that in addition to the natural growth of the labor force, people were leaving the farms to work in non-agricultural occupations, particularly in Italy and Sweden. The services, rather than manufacturing, benefited from the increasing labor supply. Manufacturing employment just maintained its relative position in the structure of the labor force, while the entire net decline in agriculture was reflected in increased employment in the services. These labor force data had some interesting implications for the institutions of the labor market. The trade unions had their main base in industry, and the absolute predominance of industrial sector employment was a plus factor in terms of their potential struggle. Other facts that emerged were the beginning, in these years, of the long march toward the growth of service employment preeminence that characterized the postwar period; the higher rate of female labor force participation in the services than in industry; and the levels of unemployment that persisted up to the outbreak of World War II but which would be completely unacceptable to any postwar government. Turning to the postwar data, it is apparent that the rate of labor force increase from 1950 to 1970 was substantially lower than that of 1920 to 1940, except again for France. There was thus a smaller pool of labor with which economic growth could be fueled. The other side of the coin was that with fewer people of working age coming into the labor market the pressure to supply gainful employment was less severe. It should be pointed out, however, that an adequate labor supply is not a sufficient condition for growth, as the interwar experience of Europe amply demonstrates. -3- TORD is LIBRARY CERALD The growth of the service sector accelerated after 1960. By 1970, Sweden had become a service-oriented nation, with more than half of all employment in that sector, and only in Germany and Italy did employment in industry still exceed that in services. This period was also marked by the growing importance of women in the labor force. The female labor force participation rate was relatively high, except for Italy, which still had a substantial reserve of womanpower in 1970. Compared with the interwar period, women were more heavily represented in the services by 1970, except for Sweden, where the interwar representation was already very high. The combina- tion of high levels of employment and the growth in demand for services in postwar Europe enabled women to play a significantly greater role in the labor market than had been possible before. Although migratory labor was already of some consequence in interwar Europe, particularly in France, what occurred after the war dwarfed the earlier experience. In the earlier years of the migrant traffic, the problems of adjustment were not severe and the migrants were glad to have the jobs at what seemed to them excellent rates of pay. But as their concentration in particular cities increased difficult social problems arose, and contributed to industrial unrest at the end of the 1960's. The increased use of women and migrants suggest that unemployment was at a low level. For the latter part of the period, unemployment must have been near the irreducible frictional minimum. Apart from Italy, which still had a soft labor market in the South, unemployment had ceased to be a matter of social consequence in the countries with which we are dealing. This, more than anything else, was the key to the development of trade unionism and orderly industrial relations systems. 3. Trade Unionism The interwar years were not good ones for the European labor movement. Ground between totalitarianism of the left and the right, democratic unions were able to survive only on the northern fringes of the Continent. From 1940 to 1945, in only embattled Britain and neutral Sweden, did trade unions continue to function. With the restor- ation of peace came a renascence of unionism wherever democracy was established. Since then, the union movement has grown in scope and power and in many countries has become the single most important economic institution. -4- FORD STGRAPY Europe was shaken by a burst of revolutionary fervor when hostilities ended in 1918. Spurred on by the establishment of the Soviet Union, allied groups in other countries sought to create the conditions for similar social changes. These movements failed of their purpose, but there remained a residue of power in the form of communist- dominated political parties and trade union organizations: that hindered subsequent efforts to create viable democratic labor groupings. Of the major industrial countries, only in Britain and Sweden did communism play an insignificant role. The most short-lived of the interwar labor movements was the Italian where the General Confederation of Labor, the main union body, ceased to exist within 2 years of Mussolini's coming into power. This situation persisted until the overthrow of fascism. Freedom lasted somewhat longer in Germany, but the end was even more grim. The German Federation of Labor, which had prospered until 1923, lost 60 percent of its membership by 1925. The collapse of the economy with the onset of the depression in 1929 put labor on the defensive. When the Nazis came to power in 1933 they dissolved the unions and incarcerated the leadership. What many had believed to be the most solidly built labor movement in the world ceased to exist. French trade unionism persisted until the nation's military defeat in 1940, but the history of the period is not much less depressing. For several years after the termination of World War I, the fortunes of the General Confederation of Labor (CGT), the traditional center of French unionism, were on the ascendant, but a disastrous general strike it conducted in 1920 led to a membership decline, from 2 million to 400,000 and a splintering into several organizations. Although the CGT survived the split and managed to pick up new members, particularly among civil servants, there was no real progress in the impact of the union movement. The effect of the Great Depression upon the French economy and French workers was not as severe as in the rest of Europe. The CGT and the Communist-led labor federation agreed to a merger in 1935. Subsequently, in the midst of a national epidemic of occupation strikes, Leon Blum assumed the premiership, and proceeded to negotiate with the CGT and the employers' federation the famous Matignon Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the major employers of France agreed in principle, for the first time, to collective bargaining. Although the practice of collective bargaining spread, its success was short-lived. The governing coalition collapsed and, in 1938, when the Communists persuaded the CGT leadership to engaged in a general strike against the Daladier government that had replaced it, the employer reaction badly hurt the unions. When the war broke out in 1939, CGT membership was down to 2 million, and the CGT was later dissolved by the Vichy government. -5- GREATE FORD LIBRAST The British trade unions proved to be very durable, despite two decades of high unemployment. They emerged from World War I with 8 million members, double the prewar level. They soon ran into trouble, however, in the form of a sharp recession in 1920, and a general strike in 1926. From that trauma, they emerged in a surprisingly strong position, and proved to be an essential element in enabling Britain to resist the German onslaught. In Sweden, finally, the trade unions and their closely allied Social Democratic Party continued on a growth path that had commenced in 1910, and the end of the 1930's saw labor firmly in power. Except for the years 1920-1924, when the unions were resisting wage cuts, the industrial relations scene was relatively peaceful. This was due in no small measure to the formation of a Socialist-led government in 1932, and to its adoption of a Keynesian policy of economic expansion involving a large public works program financed by a budget deficit, at a time when the conventional wisdom dictated paring government expenditures to the bone. Thus began the long reign of Swedish socialism, the longest tenure of democratic socialist government ever experienced. The end of the war in 1945 marked the inception of a new era in European labor history. The century-old quest for democratic socialist government, which appeared to have been finally frustrated by fascism, became a reality. The welfare state came into its full flowering, with the working class the chief beneficiaries. It would have been difficult to predict that trade unionism should have its outstanding success in Germany. The architects of the revived movement were able to establish a new federation consisting of just 16 national industrial unions, which embraced all but a small portion of the nation's organized workers. To avoid the political fissions that had such tragic consequences before the war, the German Federation of Trade Unions (DGB), from the start, has insisted upon political neutrality with no formal ties to any political party. In fact, however, the DGB has close informal ties to the Social Democratic Party. By 1970, a year after a Social Democratic government had assumed office, the trade union movement of Germany was more firmly established as a pillar of society than at any time in the past. The British unions emerged from the war with their status confirmed by the stunning electoral victory of the Labour Party in 1945. Union membership has increased from 9.3 million in 1950, to 11 million by 1970, which is 43 percent of the entire British labor force, a degree of organization scarcely paralleled elsewhere. -6- GERRLD FORD LIBRARY Membership in the Swedish Federation of Labor (LO) had risen to 1.3 million in 1950, and reached 1.7 million in 1970. But a new and interesting development occurred there. The white collar and pro- fessional employees, most of them in the rapidly growing service sector, taken all together, Swedish unionism embraces 65 percent. of the labor force, which must have been a record for the free world. Sweden is perhaps the first democratic nation in which there is almost complete organization of the working population on the basis of their economic interests. Not only industrial workers, but also farmers, employers, salaried employees, and professionals, all have associations that bargain for them collectively. Traditional concepts of labor-management relations begin to lose their relevance in this situation. Trade union membership data are not of great value in assessing the extent and influence of French trade unionism. The largest labor federation in the country is the General Confederation of Labor (CGT). Although total membership represents one of the lowest levels of organization in Western Europe, many more workers can be marshalled for strike action in times of crisis. There are many parallels between Italy and France. Even before the end of hostilities, representatives of the various pre-fascist factions met and pledged that they would avoid the divisions that had enabled Mussolini to win power. The man who would probably have headed the united movement, Bruno Buozzi, a socialist, was caught and executed and the leadership devolved upon Giuseppe di Vittorio, a communist. The newly created General Federation of Italian Labor (CGIL) grew rapidly after liberation; however, the Communist Party managed to gain effective control. In 1949, Christian Democratic supporters withdrew from the CGIL to establish the Italian Federation of Trade Unions (CISL), while the socialists founded the Italian Union of Labor (UIL). There have been numerous efforts to bring about unity, without success. As in the case of France, firm membership data are difficult to come by, but the ranking appears to be CGIL in first place, followed by CISL, with UIL a poor third. The Italian unions have the same structural weakness and the political schisms as the French. The local bodies to which workers look for representation are factory councils elected from union nominated lists of candidates. The results of these elections in large plants, such as the Fiat plant in Turin, are regarded as perhaps the most important indication of relative union strength, and receive wide press coverage. As in the case of France, firm membership data are difficult to obtain. -7- FORD & LIBRARY GROVID 4. Industrial Relations The history of prewar industrial relations parallels the development of the labor movement. Where trade unions were well established orderly systems of bargaining prevailed. The level of industrial strife was high at times, but collective bargaining was recognized as the appropriate means of setting wages. Where unions were weak, wages were fixed either by employers, by the state, or some combination of the two. Working days lost due to industrial disputes are one facet of the outcome of industrial relations. The non-agricultural labor force of Great Britain was about 80 percent that of Germany; France about half; and Sweden about 7 percent of the German. But other bases could be used if one wanted to make inter-country comparisions - total population, total labor force, the "organizable" sector, or trade union membership. Collective bargaining in Great Britain from 1920 to 1925, all years in which the number of man-days lost in strikes was relatively very high, took place against a background of economic stagnation. The incidence of strikes remained relatively low in the decade following the general strike of 1926. The Great Depression emphasized the need for mutual accommodation, for work stoppages made little sense in the presence of 15 percent unemployment. It is worth emphasizing that at a time when much of the rest of Europe was undergoing what almost amounted to class warfare, the employers and trade unions of Great Britain did manage to settle their differences in a more orderly fashion. Much the same can be said of Sweden. Wages were forced down in 1921 and 1922. Union militancy rose as soon as the economy turned up, and Sweden had some very bad years, when its strike losses exceeded the British level. In 1931, however, employers came to a decision to work closely with the unions toward a more rational solution of their difficulties. The famous collective bargaining system, with its interplay between central and local negotiation, came to maturity in the early 1930's. The German story was altogether different. German employers reacted much differently to the onset of inflation than their Swedish colleagues. A severe deflationary policy was adopted, leading to wage cuts and rapidly mounting unemployment. Resistance by the Social Democrats and the trade unions proved ineffective, and unemployment rates running over 20 percent created an electorate that proved receptive to the appeals of the Nazis. -8- GREATED FORD LISRARY France enjoyed relative prosperity throughout the 1920's. There was no postwar recession, unemployment remained low, real wages rose. But the weakness of the trade unions, with Communists in a fairly prominent position, provided employers with a convenient reason for opposing collective bargaining. The first real chance of a movement in this direction came in the mid-1930's. A switch in the Soviet policy line from opposition to cooperation with socialist parties abroad led to the unification of the French trade unions in 1935 and paved the way for adoption of the Matignon Agreement. The Agreement was reinforced by legislation making collective bargaining mandatory, establishing a 40-hour week, and providing for paid vacations. However, a general strike, mounted primarily for political purposes in November 1938, proved to be a failure and labor-mangement cooperation diminished rapidly. There was little doubt about the path industrial relations would take after 1945. The increase in union power and the leftward trend in government afforded employers no alternative but to acquiesce in collective bargaining arrangements. The pattern of money wage increases by prewar standards, were very substantial throughout the period 1950-1970. British wages failed to advance as rapidly as did those of the other countries; but correspondingly low increases in labor productivity led to constant pressure on prices nonetheless. There was no break in Great Britain with the pre-existing bar- gaining system. The great majority of workers were covered by collective agreements. The task of curbing inflation devolved increasingly upon government. Labour governments were reluctant to confront their trade union constituents with the need for moderation and the Conservatives were opposed ideologically to government intervention. Yet both were obliged to react with an incomes policy at a number of critical junctures. These interventions probably had a long-run impact on wages and prices if only because they interrupted expectations of higher wages and prices. Despite its shortcomings, the British system of labor relations had functioned fairly well for almost half a century. For many years, strikes almost vanished from the Swedish labor relations scene. This achievement was facilitated by the negotiation of nationwide agreements between the central federations of employers and employees. Very much in contrast with Britain, the government refrained from direct intervention in the labor market, even though it was led by the Social Democratic Party which was committed to wage equalization through special increases for the lowest paid - the so-called solidaristic wage policy. -9- FORD LIBRAR The fact that all social groups in Sweden had organized for collective bargaining posed some difficult problems for industrial relations. What began as bargaining on a limited scale had become a system of group bargaining involving most of the population. Sweden may be reaching the logical end of traditional collective bargaining. When everyone is prepared to strike, the strike loses its meaning. Germany had not yet evolved that far. A system that accorded trade unions representation on the governing boards of corporations was a major union demand. Moreover, rapid economic growth made it relatively easy to satisfy demands for higher wages. German collective bargaining is highly centralized. The industrial unions conclude agreements with associations of employers on a regional basis, and these agreements can be extended by law to all employees in the region if they are signed by employers who employ a majority of the workers in the industry in the particular region. Government-imposed incomes policy proved unnecessary in the face of the success achieved by collective bargaining in keeping wages in line with productivity. The development of collective bargaining in France lagged behind that of Northern Europe after the war. The idea of fixed term contracts, with negotiation confined to regular intervals, was slow in getting established. The coexistence of competing trade union federations, often divided on strategy, has hindered the development of a more orderly bargaining system. The government exercised its influence mainly through price controls, which were imposed sporadically when inflation threatened. We come now to Italy, where the history of labor relations has many similarities to that of France. During the 1950's, unemployment was relatively high and the trade unions were weak. Bargaining took the form of industry-wide agreements giving the individual employer a great deal of latitude. There was already a great deal of overt conflict, but the decade of the 1950's must be seen as a era of labor peace compared with what came after. With the tightening of the labor market a so-called "articulated" bargaining system was introduced, which had as its component parts national agreements on general issues and minimum wages, supplemented by detailed plant agreements on price rates, job classification schemes, and productivity bonuses. The new practice had its origin in a series of strikes in 1962, and although its spread was slowed by the economic recession of 1963, the precedent had been established. The Italian collective bargaining system was not yet adequate in 1970. But strikes and demonstrations have become a way of life for Italian workers, and there are few countries in the world where they are practiced with as much enthusiasm. -10- FORD Classey There still remains the puzzling matter of the strike climacteric of 1968-1970 that swept through Europe. It led everywhere to a sharp increase in wages and, eventually, in union power. Widespread social phenomena are exceedingly complex in nature. Among the factors that may have contributed to the outburst are the following: 1. By 1970, a substantial proportion of the labor force con- sisted of individuals with only dim, if any, recollections of the hardships suffered during the Great Depression and World War II. In most of the countries, but particularly in France and Italy, younger people played an important role in the strike movement. The student unrest of the period, which in France preceded the strikes, was undoubtedly transmitted through younger workers. 2. Not only the postwar generation, but all workers, would not have been greatly concerned with loss of jobs as a consequence of striking. 3. Large upward movements in consumer prices tend to stimulate dissatisfaction, while rising money wages tend to allay it. Eventual perception of what is happening to real income becomes a powerful factor. In general, the annual rate of price increases was either stable or falling during the five years preceding 1968. However, there was a tendency for the rate of increase in money wages to fall after 1964 or 1965. Thus, workers had become accustomed to more rapid improvement in their living standards than what the economy was delivering to them in the years immediately preceding 1968. The strike fever, once it had gotten started, found great receptivity among Western European workers; the trade union leader- ship was awakened from its lethargy, and collective bargaining demands soon escalated to new dimensions. The double figure wage and price increase era had begun for Europe. 5. The Social and Economic Status of the Worker The status of citizens of Western Europe, and of industrial workers in particular, has undergone a remarkable transformation in the postwar years. Employment insecurity, penury in old age, slum housing, and inadequate access to health services have been replaced by comprehensive systems of social welfare. A major part of the credit for this achievement must go to the trade unions. Directly through the collective bargaining process, and indirectly through their political power, they pressed for and succeeded in winning a variety of social benefits that are hardly likely to have come in their absence. -11- GERALD FORD European housing standards have improved dramatically since the war, particularly with respect to amenities; working hours have been coming down and the quality of health care, at least in terms of the availability of physicians, has risen substantially during the postwar years. By 1970 a retired worker in Western Europe could expect to receive a pension equal to 50 to 75 percent of final earnings; unemployment benefits ran from 30 to 90 percent of previous earnings, but even where benefits were relatively low, family allowances continued and helped balance the family budget; sickness allowances ranged from 50 to 80 percent of wages. These benefits mean a great advance over conditions prevailing from 1920 to 1940. Perhaps the outstanding result of labor's rise to power has been the drive for greater equality in the distribution of income. The favored income groups have been reluctant to accept a reduction in their relative income shares, and the result is a struggle over the distribution of the national product that is one of the major causes of contemporary inflation. Generally speaking, the same is true for the rest of Europe. Collective bargaining is moving toward a higher plane and is rapidly becoming the focal point of economic policy. Trade unions have learned that they can force even unfriendly governments into substantial concessions, making incomes policy difficult to enforce. It is already clear that the end of the 1960's ushered in a new phase in the history of European labor relations. -12- FORD & LIBRARY Table 1: Indexes of Real National Income in Europe, 1920-1939 (1925-29 = 100) Year France Germany Sweden United Kingdom 1920 66 n.a. 90 95 1925 94 91 90 94 1930 110 102 113 104 1935 92 101 120 119 1939 100 145 157 132 Source: Ingvar Svennilson, Growth and Stagnation in the European Economy, Economic Commission for Europe, 1954, p. 233. Table 2: Indexes of Gross Domestic Product in Europe, 1950-1970 (1950 = 100) Year France Germany Italy Sweden United Kingdom 1950 100 100 100(1951) 100 100 1955 124 157 124 117 116 1960 159 226 162 140 132 1965 211 289 210 204 154 1970 279 361 281 247 172 Source: O.E.C.D., National Accounts of O.E.C.D. Countries, and United Nations, Yearbook of National Accounts Statistics, various issues. FORD & LIBRARY Table 4: Average Annual Increase in Manufacturing Wages, 1950-1970 a b a b France Germany Italy Sweden United Kingdom 1950-1955 14.8 7.8 5.8 8.7 a 14.0 b 1955-1960 9.7 9.8 4.7 6.8 5.2 b 1960-1965 8.7 11.5 12.8 9.9 4.9 1965-1970 11.0 8.6 9.6 10.7 7.7ᵇ a/ Hourly rates b/ Hourly earnings Source: I.L.O., Yearbook of Labour Statistics, 1950-1955; O.E.C.D., Main Economic Indicators, 1955-1970. FORD is LIBRARY 03 Table 5: Number of Working Days Lost Due to Labor Disputes, 1950-1970 (Thousands) 1 France Germany Italy Sweden United Kingdom 1950 11,729 7,761 41 1,389 1951 3,495 1,593 4,515 531 1,694 1952 1,733 443 3,531 79 1,792 1953 9,722 1,488 5,828 582 2,184 1954 1,440 1,587 5,377 25 2,457 1955 3,079 857 5,622 159 3,781 1956 1,423 1,580 4,137 4 2,083 1957 4,121 1,072 4,619 53 8,412 1958 1,138 782 4,172 15 3,462 1959 1,938 62 9.190 24 5,270 1960 1,070 37 5,786 19 3,024 1961 2,601 61 9,891 2 3,046 1962 1,901 451 22,717 5 5,798 1963 5,991 1,846 11,395 25 1,755 1964 2,497 17 13,089 34 2,277 1965 980 49 6,993 4 2,925 1966 2,523 27 14,473 352 2,398 1967 4,204 390 8,568 0.4 2,787 1968 n.a. 25 9,240 1 4,690 1969 2,224 249 37,825 112 6,846 1970 1,742 93 18,277 156 10,980 Excludes political strikes Source: International Labour Office, Yearbook of Labour Statistics, various years. GERA43 FORD Table 6: Annual Percentage Increase in Money Wages, 1961-1971 France Germany Italy Sweden United Kingdom 1961 7.7 8.6 4.5 8.9 5.5 1962 8.5 10.7 10.7 7.0 3.3 1963 8.6 6.5 14.7 8.7 2.9 1964 6.9 6.9 14.0 6.0 4.9 1965 5.8 7.0 8.5 11.3 5.9 1966 5.9 7.4 3.8 7.6 6.0 1967 6.0 5.3 5.2 9.4 4.3 1968 12.4 4.4 3.6 6.5 8.0 1969 11.3 6.4 7.5 8.1 5.8 1970 10.5 12.6 21.7 13.8 9.6 1971 11.2 13.7 13.5 7.1 11.4 Source: OECD, Main Economic Indicators, various issues. Table 7: Annual Percentage Increase in Real Wages, 1961-1971 France Germany Italy Sweden United Kingdom 1961 4.4 6.0 2.3 6.2 2.0 1962 3.4 7.6 5.8 2.5 -1.0 1963 3.6 3.4 6.7 5.6 0.8 1964 3.4 4.5 7.6 2.5 1.5 1965 2.5 3.4 3.8 6.0 1.2 1966 3.1 3.8 1.4 1.2 2.0 1967 3.3 3.8 2.0 4.9 1.8 1968 7.5 2.6 2.2 4.4 3.1 1969 4.6 3.7 4.8 5.3 0 1970 5.0 8.6 15.8 6.2 3.0 1971 5.4 8.0 8.2 0 1.9 Source: OECD, Main Economic Indicators, various issues. FORD LIGHTED Table 8: Social Security Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of the Gross National Productᶜ a 1950 a a 1955 1960 a b b 1963 1966 1970 France 10.9 10.2 12.7 14.6 15.5 15.8 Germany 14.1 13.4 14.9 15.3 16.0 17.2 Italy 7.9 10.2 12.0 12.8 15.9 16.8 Sweden 9.3 10.8 12.1 13.5 15.6 United Kingdom 8.9 9.1 10.3 11.2 12.6 Japan 3.2 4.8 4.7 5.2 6.0 United States 4.0 4.3 6.2 6.2 7.2 Sources: International Labour Office, The Cost of Social Security, Geneva, 1967, Table 2. Statistical Office of the European Community, Basic Statistics of the Community, 1971, p. 104. c The data for 1966 and 1970 may not be fully comparable with those for the earlier years. Social security as here defined consists of payments for old age pensions, unemployment compensation, family allowances, public health services, and public assistance to the needy. BERALD FORD 4-23-75 JTD Supplemental Tables The Labor Force and Labor Problems in Europe, 1920-1970 Supplement to Table 1: Indexes of Real National Income (1925-29 = 100) United States Index 1/ Year 1920 74 1925 93 1930 97 1935 94 1939 115 1/ Index of net national product in 1929 dollars. Source: John W. Kendrick, "Productivity Trends in the United States," NBER, 1961, as published in Bureau of the Census, Long Term Economic Growth, 1860-1965, 1966. GERALO K. FORD Supplement to Table 2: Indexes of Gross Domestic Product 1950 = 100 United States 1950 100 1955 124 1960 138 1965 174 1970 207 1973 239 Other Countries United 1/ Year France Germany Italy Sweden Kingdom 1955 rev. 122 118 1960 rev. 156 229 139 1965 rev. 207 293 178 1970 rev. 274 369 280 215 174 1973 324 413 311 229 193 1/ 1951 = 100. Source: European Community, National Accounts, 1960-1971; and national publications. FORD & DERALE LIBRARY Supplement to Table 3 Population Aged 15 to 64 Years (Thousands of Persons) United States Population: 1950 98,624 1960 107,919 1970 126,847 1972 131,141 Percent increase: 1950-1960 9.4 1960-1970 17.5 1970-1972 3.4 Other. Countries Population, 1972: France 32,269 Germany (1971) 38,954 Italy 35,236 Sweden 5,280 United Kingdom 34,987 Percent increase, 1970-1972: France 1.9 Germany (1970-71) .9 Italy .4 Sweden .2 United Kingdom -.8 Source: OECD, Labour Force Statistics, various issues. FORD Supplement to Table 4 Average Annual Increase in Manufacturing Wages United States (1/) 1950-1955 5.8 1955-1960 4.3 1960-1965 3.1 1965-1970 5.7 1970-1973 7.0 Other Countries United Period France 2/ 1/ Germany Italy 2/ Sweden 1/ 3/ Kingdom 1970-73 13.9 11.3 18.6 11.0 14.1 1/ Hourly earnings. 2/ Hourly rates. 3/ Hourly rates, adult males only. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; and OECD, Main Economic Indicators. SERALD FORD Supplement to Table 5 Number of Working Days Lost Due to Labor Disputes (Thousands) United States 1950 38,800 1962 18,600 1951 22,920 1963 16,100 1952 59,100 1964 22,900 1953 28,300 1965 23,300 1954 22,600 1966 25,400 1955 28,200 1967 42,100 1956 33,100 1968 49,018 1957 16,500 1969 42,869 1958 23,900 1970 66,414 1959 69,000 1971 47,589 1960 19,100 1972 27,066 1961 16,300 1973 27,948 1974 48,000 Other Countries United Year France Germany Italy Sweden Kingdom 1970 20,887 (rev.) 1971 4,388 4,484 14,799 839 13,551 1972 3,755 66 19,497 11 23,909 1973 3,915 563 23,419 12 7,197 1974 3,377 1,051 N.A. N.A. 14,740 Source: International Labour Office, Year Book of Labour Statistics; and national publications. QEARLE FORD (18RAB) Supplement to Table 6 Annual Percentage Increase in Money Wages (Manufacturing) United States (1/) 1961 2.7 1962 3.0 1963 2.9 1964 2.8 1965 3.2 1966 4.2 1967 4.0 1968 6.4 1969 6.0 1970 5.3 1971 6.0 1972 7.0 1973 6.8 Other Countries United Year France 2/ 2/ 2/ Germany Sweden 1/ Italy Kingdom 3/ 14.8 13.5 1972 11.3 8.5 10,4 9.8 24.3 8.4 12.5 1973 14.5 1/ Hourly earnings. 2/ Hourly rates. 3/ Hourly rates, adult male workers. Source: OECD, Main Economic Indicators, various issues. SCRIAL FORD Supplement to Table 7. Annual Percentage Increase in Real Wages (Manufacturing) United States (1/) 1961 1.6 1962 1.9 1963 1.7 1964 1.5 1965 1.4 1966 1.3 1967 1.1 1968 2.1 1969 .6 1970 -.6 - 1971 1.6 1972 3.6 1973 .6 Other Countries United Year France 2/ Germany 2/ Italy 2/ Sweden 1/ Kingdom 3/ 1972 5.2 2.8 4.4 8.4 5.9 1973 6.7 2.6 12.1 2.1 3.0 1/ Based on average hourly earnings. 2/ Based on average hourly rates. 3/ Based on average hourly rates, adult male workers. Source: OECD, Main Economic Indicators, various issues. TISRACT GERALD FORD Supplement to Table 8 : Social Security Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Gross Product Country 1966 1970 1972 France 16.2 16.7 17.2 Germany 13.1 12.6 13.3 Italy 13.6 14.2 16.8 Sweden 10.2 12.1 14.1 United Kingdom 8.4 9.6 10.5 Japan 4.4 4.3 4.7 United States 5.2 7.2 8.0 Note: Above data are not consistent with data in original table, mainly because the cost of public health services is excluded from the above. Also, above data are based on gross domestic product (GDP) whereas original table is based on GNP. Source: OECD, National Accounts of OECD Countries, 1961-1972. CERALD FORD Supplement to Table 9 : Indicators of Housing Standards Average number of persons per room United Kingdom 1971 0.8 Japan 1970 1.0 Source: United Nations, Statistical Yearbook, 1973. FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Supplement to Table 10: Weekly Hours in Manufacturing United States (hours paid) 1953 40.5 1970 39.8 1973 40.7 Other Countries 1973 France (regularly scheduled hours) 43.6 Germany (hours paid) 42.8 Italy (hours worked) 7.3 (daily) United Kingdom (hours worked, 44.7 adult male workers) Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; and United Nations, Monthly Bulletin of Statistics. AM R FORD LIBITED Supplement to Table 11: Population per Physician More Recent Data France, 1971 721 Italy, 1972 530 Japan, 1971 871 United States, 1971 634 Source: United Nations, Statistical Yearbook, 1973. A FORD STEN THE DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF LABOR STATES STATE WASHINGTON May 12, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY This week we expect to make the first determination on a trade adjustment assistance case under the new legislation, the Trade Act of 1974. Attached is a brief description of the new program and some background material describing the main differences between the old and new program of adjustment assistance. Jultzall Secretary Affairs Attachments GERMAN % FORD May 9, 1975 Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers While increased trade is of benefit to the economy as a whole, it may also cause special problems to firms and their employees particularly vulnerable to import competition. Trade adjustment assistance is a program of cash benefits and employment services for workers who lose their jobs because of increased imports. The first trade adjustment assistance program appeared in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. In operation, the program provided little assistance and less adjustment. 1. No cases at all were approved during the first seven years of the program's existence; 2. far more cases were denied than approved; 3. during the full life of the program, 12 years, fewer than 54,000 workers were certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance; 4. many of those who did receive benefits received them long after they secured other employment; as a consequence, very few recipients were able to use the employment services for which they were eligible. A summary table of adjustment assistance cases under the 1962 Act appears at the end of this paper. The requirements of the 1962 program for access to adjustment assistance were too harsh and the procedures far too complex and lengthy to permit the timely delivery of benefits. The trade adjustment assistance program in the Trade Act of 1974 is a streamlined, more generous version of the 1962 program. It is estimated that about 100,000 workers a year will qualify for adjustment assistance and that the cost of the program will be about $350 million a year. The main provisions of the worker adjustment assistance program under the Trade Act of 1974 are as follows: 1. A group of as few as three workers may file a petition for assistance directly with the Secretary of Labor. (Previously the petition went to the Tariff Commission.) FORD is 07V8 13 - 2 - 2. The group of workers may be certified if it can be shown that increased imports have contributed importantly to the unemployment or underemployment of the workers and to a decline in the sales or production of the workers' firm or subdivision. Imports need not be the most important single cause of unemployment. (Previously it had to be shown that increased imports were caused in major part by a tariff concession and that such imports were the major cause of unemployment.) 3. A decision on certification of the petitioning group must be made within 60 days of the filing of the petition. 4. After a certification is issued, individual workers apply for benefits to the local Employment Security Agencies in their area. They must show that they have been employed in the affected firm for 26 of the last 52 weeks prior to their import-related unemployment. 5. The principal benefits available to eligible workers include: -- cash allowances equal to 70 percent of the worker's average weekly wage up to a maximum of 100 percent of the average weekly wage in manufacturing. The cash allowances, which are not taxed, are to be made up of the regular unemployment insurance payment plus a Federal supplement. This year the maximum total allowance is $176 a week. (Previously the allowances were set at 65 percent of the worker's average wage up to a maximum of 65 percent of the average wage in manufacturing, with the entire allowance coming from Federal funds.) These allowances may be paid for 52 weeks except that (1) a worker 60 years old may receive an additional 26 weeks of benefits and (2) a worker may receive an additional 26 weeks of benefits to complete a training program. --- counseling and placement services. -- training programs, preferably on-the-job training, if such training will help qualify him for a new job. - new provision for job search expenses up to $500. -- relocation allowances for workers who must leave their community to take a new job. GERALD R. FORD - 3 - Within the Department of Labor the general responsibility for the worker adjustment assistance program is lodged in the Bureau of International Labor Affairs and its Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. That Bureau is responsible for receiving the petitions, conducting the investigations of import injury, holding of public hearings, and certifying the eligibility of the petitioning groups of workers. The Manpower Administration has the primary responsibility for the delivery of services after certification. The Manpower Administration will be working through the Regional Offices of the Department of Labor, and through the State and local Employment Security Agencies. In same instances the prime sponsors established under the Comprehensive Employ- ment and Training Act will deliver the employment services to workers. A diagram showing the process in sequence is attached. The success of the system will depend on the ability to identify quickly those workers who might be eligible for trade adjustment assistance. Quick identification is critical if we are to reduce substantially the time between unemployment and receipt of benefits. To help identify eligible workers, the Department has developed and is refining an early warning system involving reports of mass layoffs, indicators of unemployment insurance activity, and regular reports on import penetration by industry. Officials of the Department have been meeting in different parts of the country with regional, State and local officials and with representatives of trade unions to explain the program and the pro- cedures to be followed. Such meetings have been held in Dallas, Boston, Atlanta, and San Francisco and a meeting is scheduled late this month in Denver. The adjustment assistance provisions of the Trade Act became effective on April 3, 1975. As of May 7, the Department has received 25 petitions covering some 7,500 workers. Investigations of these petitions are now in process and the first determinations will be issued during the second half of May. Leather footwear and electronics are the principal products involved in the petitions now in hand. Other petitions are from workers in textiles, wood veneer, and copper mining. The Department has prepared a question and answer pamphlet on the adjustment assistance program which will be widely distributed around the country. The Department also has available a detailed comparison of the adjustment assistance programs under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1974. GREATE in FORD Trade Adjustment Assistance Under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 October 1962 through April 2, 1975 : Number of : Number :worker groups: of workers Petitions to the Tariff Commission: Total 263 115,216 Denials 165 64,301 Affirmative findings 52 28,351 Evenly divided 43 21,443 Withdrawn or dismissed without decision 3 1,121 Certification investigations completed by the Labor Department: Investigations involving workers subject to Tariff Commission affirmative or evenly divided findings 95 49,794 Certified 95 Presidential authorization arising from industry escape clause actions 21 7,235 Certified 15 4,105 Denied 6 3,130 Total certified 110 53,899 FORD LIBRARY GTUDTO Trade Act of 1974 Adjustment Assistance Petitioning and Benefit Delivery Process Petition Filed by Group of 3 or more workers, or a worker representative; e.g., union or company official Submitted to Department of Labor Bureau of International Labor Affairs Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance Manpower Administration notified Investigation Instituted Notice published in Federal Register State Employment Security Agency notified Interviews with company, Field Investigation Public Hearing If requested within ten days worker and employment after Notice published in securityrepresentative Federal Register Survey of Company Customers industry analysis Investigative Report Recommendation of Certification or Denial Leaves Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance Legal Review by Office of the Solicitor Leaves Office of the Solicitor Review by Certifying Officer NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Notice published in Federal Register ISSUED Certification or Denial Identifies group End of case of workers certified or Program focus Manpower Administration Judicial Review If petition requesting review filed shifts to Manpower with appropriate U.S. Circuit Court of Notified Petitioner(s) Administration and Appeals within 60 days of Notice Notified State Employment State Employment Security agencies Security agency notified Determination of Individuals Certified workers file requests for determination Entitlement to Program Benefits of entitlement at their local employment security office Trade Readjustment Entitled to or Allowances Not Entitled Job Relocation Allowance Job Search Allowance Appeal through State Employment Training Security channels Counseling and Placement from State Employment Services Security Agency or FORD LIBRART CETA Prime Sponsor ILAB/TAA/LLB May 8, 1975 Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers: Questions and Answers U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of International Labor Affairs GERRA R. FORD LIBRABY Nature Benefits and Scope Q. What is trade adjustment Q. What are trade readjustment assistance for workers? allowances? Q. What is the relationship between TRA and UI? A. Trade adjustment assistance for workers is a Federal pro- A. Trade readjustment allow- ances (TRA) are weekly pay- A. Generally, TRA supplements what an eligible worker re- gram administered by the U.S. De- ments which, when added to State ceives as unemployment insurance. partment of Labor and cooperating unemployment insurance (UI) pay- The amount of TRA payable to an State employment security agencies ments to which a worker is entitled, adversely affected worker is reduced under provisions of the Trade Act of equal 70 percent of the average by the amount of UI that the individ- 1974. Established to help American weekly wage the worker earned be- ual receives or would receive if he or workers who become totally or par- fore his or her employment was dis- she applied for UI. Since TRA pay- tially unemployed as a result of rupted by import competition. The ments may be received for a longer increased imports, the program pro- maximum TRA a worker may receive period than regular UI, a worker may vides eligible workers with trade can be no greater than the national be eligible for TRA even after readjustment allowances during average weekly wage in manufactur- eligibility for UI has been exhausted. periods of unemployment or under- ing. (Payments for weeks of unem- employment. The program also as- ployment prior to April 3, 1975 would sists workers to regain satisfactory equal 65 percent of the worker's employment through the use of a average weekly wage not to exceed full range of manpower services and, 65 percent of the national average if needed, job search and relocation weekly manufacturing wage.) allowances. 1 Procedure for Obtaining Adjustment Assistance How long may a worker re- What other types of assist- Who is eligible for training ceive trade readjustment Q. What is a job search What is a relocation Who may file a petition for ance may workers eligible for and what kind of training can allowance? allowance? adjustment assistance? allowances? adjustment assistance receive? eligible workers receive? A. A worker may receive basic A. Workers are eligible for a full A. A. A job search allowance con- A. A relocation allowance con- sists of reimbursement to a A. Any group of three or more Appropriate training may be sists of reimbursement for workers of a firm or subdivi- TRA for up to 52 weeks. A range of manpower services authorized for workers who expenses incurred by a worker in worker for expenses incurred in sion of a firm, their union, or their worker 60 years of age or older at offered by State employment secu- must acquire a new skill or upgrade seeking suitable reemployment. An moving to another locality to obtain duly authorized representative, who the time of separation may receive rity agencies designed to assist them their current skills in order to be- unemployed worker may be certified employment. An unemployed worker feel that increased import competi- up to 26 additional weeks of allow- in returning as quickly as possible to come suitably reemployed. Training eligible for a job seach allowance if who is unable to find suitable em- tion has contributed importantly to ances. A worker enrolled in or ap- productive employment. Such serv- may be either technical or profes- he or she is seeking employment ployment within the commuting area the workers' unemployment or un- proved for training may receive up ices include testing, counseling, job sional in nature. While institutional within the United States and cannot may be certified to receive an allow- deremployment may petition the U.S. to 26 additional weeks of allowances placement, training, and supportive training involving formal classroom be reasonably expected to find satis- ance to cover 80 percent of reason- Department of Labor for a determi- in order to complete training, pro- services. instruction is available, an emphasis factory employment within the com- able and necessary moving expenses nation of eligibility to apply for ad- vided the worker applied for such is placed upon on-the-job training, muting area. Reimbursements are for plus a lump sum (up to $500) equal justment assistance. training within 180 days after becom- which combines instruction with 80 percent of the worker's necessary to three times the worker's average ing eligible to apply for adjustment practical experience. The vocational job search expenses, not to exceed weekly wage. To be eligible for a assistance or becoming unemployed skills and interests of the individual $500. An application for a job search relocation allowance a worker must or underemployed, whichever is as well as the employment needs of allowance must be filed within one have obtained suitable permanent later. In no event may an individual the community will influence what year of a worker's last total or partial employment within the United States receive more than 78 weeks of form the training will take. separation or within a reasonable or a bona fide offer of such employ- allowances. period after completion of training ment. approved under the adjustment assistance program. 2 3 Certification Process Must workers wait until they Q. How do workers petition for What types of information become unemployed or under- adjustment assistance? should be included on a peti- What happens once a petition If the Department of Labor deter- employed before petitioning for ad- tion for adjustment assistance? for adjustment assistance has mines that import injury has occurred What is a certification? justment assistance? A. Workers may go to the nearest been filed? or threatens to occur, it will issue a office of their State employ- A. A petition for adjustment as- certification of eligibility to apply for No. Workers who feel that in- The Department of Labor will A. A certification is an official au- A. ment security agency and request a sistance must include identi- A. adjustment assistance. thorization by the Department creased imports are causing Petition for Adjustment Assistance fication of (1) the petitioners; (2) the conduct an investigation to de- of Labor for a specified group of an immediate threat to their employ- (ILAB Form 20) or they may notify group of workers on whose behalf termine if increased imports of arti- workers to apply for adjustment as- ment may petition on the basis of the Department of Labor's Office of the petition is filed; (3) the workers' cles like or directly competitive with sistance. The certification indicates such a threat. Announcements by Trade Adjustment Assistance di- employer; (4) the approximate date those produced by the petitioning the date that imports began causing company officials of an imminent rectly of their interest in filing a the workers' total or partial unem- group of workers have contributed or threatening to cause unemploy- plant shutdown or of a reduction in petition for adjustment assistance. ployment began and continued, or or threaten to contribute importantly ment or underemployment of the workforce are examples of threat- Workers may telephone (202-523- threatened to begin, and the approxi- to (1) the unemployment or under- workers (impact date); the date, if ened unemployment. 6225) or write to: mate number of workers affected; employment of a significant number applicable, that such import injury U.S. Department of Labor and (5) the articles produced by the or proportion of the workers and stopped (termination date); and the workers' firm and the imported arti- (2) a decline in sales or production Bureau of International Labor Affairs group of workers eligible to apply for cles concerned. A petition should of the petitioners' firm or subdivision. Office of Trade Adjustment adjustment assistance (appropriate also include a statement of reasons The Department will complete its Assistance subdivision). Washington, D.C. 20210 for believing that increased imports investigation and issue an official of such articles contributed impor- notice of determination no later than tantly to the workers' unemployment 60 days after a petition is filed. and to the decline in sales or pro- duction of the firm or subdivision. 4 5 Q. What are impact dates and What is the appropriate Q. Is a certification effective termination dates? Q. How will workers know if their Do workers automatically Q. What are the individual quali- subdivision? indefinitely? case has been certified? receive benefits after a certifi- fying requirements which a cation is issued? worker covered by a certification A. The impact date is the earliest date on which separations A. The appropriate subdivision is A. No. Generally, a certification is A. The Department of Labor will must meet in order to receive that part of the firm or plant in effective for two years from directly notify the workers or which workers lost their jobs as a the date it is issued. Thus, workers worker representative who filed the A. No. When a worker learns that from the firm or subdivision are at- trade adjustment assistance? his or her group has been tributable to increased imports. The result of competitive imports. Desig- whose last total or partial separation petition of the Department's deter- certified, the worker must go to the A. The basic qualifying require- termination date is the date after nation of the appropriate subdivision occurred after the expiration of the mination. The local office of the State local employment security office and ments are as follows: which separations are no longer serves to clearly identify the workers two-year period from the date of employment security agency will at- apply for trade adjustment assist- 1. The worker must have been attributable to increased imports. covered by a certification in cases certification would not be eligible to tempt to notify all workers covered ance. The office will determine if the employed with the firm or appro- where a firm or plant manufactures apply for adjustment assistance. by a certification of their eligibility worker is covered by the certification priate subdivision at wages of at more than one product. to apply for adjustment assistance. and whether certain basic qualifying least $30 per week for at least 26 Also, local radio stations and news- requirements have been met. If the of the 52 weeks preceding his or papers will be notified of the issu- worker is determined qualified, the her last total or partial separation. ance of a certification. office will establish his or her weekly 2. The worker's last separation from TRA entitlement and explain the the firm or subdivision must have services available under the program. occurred after October 3, 1974, and not more than one year before the date of the petition upon which the certification was granted. 6 7 Appeals 3. The worker must have become What should a worker do If the Department of Labor separated on or after the impact who, after becoming unem- determines that a petitioning not supported by substantial evi- date specified in the certification ployed and moving to another state, group of workers is not eligible to dence, the Department will take and before the termination date or learns that former employees of the apply for adjustment assistance, are further evidence and may issue a the expiration of the certification. worker's old company have been the workers entitled to appeal that new or modified finding. certified eligible to apply for adjust- determination? ment assistance? A. Yes. Court review is provided A. The worker should go imme- for in the Trade Act. A worker, group of workers, or authorized rep- BERALD FORD VIBRARY diately to the nearest employ- ment security office and apply for resentative may, within 60 days after adjustment assistance. That office a notice of a final negative determi- will assist the worker in filing a claim. nation is issued, file a petition for If found eligible, the worker will be review with the United States Court able to receive benefits where he or of Appeals for the circuit in which she is presently living. the worker or worker group is located or with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. If the Court rules that a final deter- mination by the Secretary of Labor is 8 9 See Reverse Side for Processing Instructions U.S. Department of Labor PETITION FOR ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE Exp. Sept. This is a petition under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 and Subpart B of Part 90 of the Rules of practice of the Secretary of Labor. 1. State the name, address and telephone number of each petitioner and the group of workers on whose behalf the petition is filed. (For each petitioner who is worker and who is not currently employed at the firm, give the date of his most re- cent total or partial separation from the firm.) Name: 1) 2) 3) Address: Telephone: Date Separation Group of Workers Involved: If the petition is being filed by worker representative, give the capacity in which the petitioner is filing, e.g., union local president, corporate treasurer II. List the name and address of the firm and each subdivision of the firm at which the workers for whom this petition is filed are (were) employed. III. State the name, address, telephone number and its of official of the firm. (The official should be someone knowledgeable about the firm's production, sales and employments IV. State the date on which separations due to increased imports began and continued, or are scheduled to begin, and the approximate number of workers affected (List this informal separately for each subdivision of the firm listed in II.) V. Give a description of the articles produced by the firm, the sales of pro duction of which are being adversely affected by increased Imports, and description of the imported articles concerned (Include such information as the common and tech- nical names of the articles, the method of manufacture, the end uses.gnd the wholesale or retail value of the articles.) VI. State the reasons for believing increased importa have contributed importantly to decline in the sales or production of the firm or subdivision of the firm and to the workers' actual or through of employment. (Attach any supporting documents such as statements by officials of the firm or newspaper articles.) This petition must be signed below by three workers of the firm or by their duly authorized representative. (we) hereby affirm that the information included in this petition is correct to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. Signed Date: (LAB Form 1975) Regulations governing trade adjust- ment assistance for workers as out- lined in this pamphlet are specified in Parts 90-91, Subtitle A, Title 29, of the Code of Federal Regulations, as revised April 3, 1975. 10 Processing Instructions Petition for Adjustment Assistance ILAB Form 20 (March 1975) Who may file a petition-A petition may be filed by a group of three or more workers in a firm, or a subdivision thereof, or by their union or other duly authorized representative. The workers on whose behalf a petition is filed must be, or have been, employed regularly at the firm or subdivision Identified in the petition. The workers' employment must be, or have been, related to the production of articles described in the petition. Assistance in preparing a petition-Workers may request assistance in preparing a petition at any local employment security agency office. Also, workers may write or telephone (202-523-6225) the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Filing a petition-Petitions should be addressed to: U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of International Labor Affairs Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance 3rd Street and Constitution Avenue, N. W., Rm. S-5313 Washington, D. C. 20210 General Instructions-Print or type. Complete all items. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets to this form. In firm will not release the information. Submit a signed original and two clear copies of this form when filing a petition. some cases, some of the information requested may not be available. If so, give the reason it is not available, e.g., the Regulations, Part 90. Further information and clarification concerning the filing of this petition may be found in Title 29 of the Code of Federal GPO 890-027 May 12, 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ¿ 14804 BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20210 AMERICA STATES = Adjustment Assistance for Workers Under the Trade Act of 1974 On January 3, 1975, President Ford signed into law the Trade Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-618), which makes important changes in this country's international trade, tariff, and economic policies, and also gives the President substantial negotiating authority necessary for participation in forthcoming international trade negotiations. Of particular interest are changes made by the Trade Act of 1974 in the worker adjustment assistance program. This program is intended to provide special protection and help to American workers whose unemployment or underemployment is linked to increased imports of foreign-made articles. A comparison follows between major provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 and the older provisions of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 as to worker adjustment assistance The provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 will supersede the provisions of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 as of April 3, 1975 Trade Expansion Act of 1962 Trade Act of 1974 Petitions Submitted To U.S. Tariff Commission* Secretary of Labor Injury Test (1) Articles like or directly (1) Same competitive with those produced by the workers concerned must be imported in increased quantities; (2) The increased imports must be a (2) Sales or production of the result in major part of concessions workers' firm or subdivision must granted under trade agreements; have declined absolutely; (3) A significant number or proportion (3) Same of the workers concerned must be unemployed or underemployed, or threatened with unemployment or GERALD R. FORD LIBRARY underemployment; and (4) The increased imports resulting (4) The increased imports must have from trade agreement concessions contributed importantly to the must be the major factor causing workers' actual or threatened or threatening to cause the separation and to the decline in workers' unemployment or under- sales or production. employment. *On January 3, 1975 the U.S. Tariff Commission was renamed the U.S. International Trade Commission. - 2 - Trade Expansion Act of 1962 Trade Act of 1974 Determination of Injury By U.S. Tariff Commission, not later Secretary of Labor, not later than 60 days after petition is than 60 days after petition is filed. (President of United States filed. resolves tie votes). Certification By President of United States Secretary of Labor, not later (delegated to Department of than 60 days after petition is Labor), 20-30 days after a finding filed. of injury by the Tariff Commission. Qualifying Requirements for Workers (1) Employed 26 of 52 weeks immediately (1) Employed 26 of the 52 weeks preceding separation at wages of immediately preceding separation $15 or more a week in a firm or at wages of $30 or more a week firms with respect to which a in a single firm or subdivision finding of injury has been made; of a firm with respect to which a finding of injury has been made (2) Employed 78 of 156 weeks (2) Total or partial separation from immediately preceding separation the firm or appropriate subdivision at wages of $15 or more a week; occurred no more than one year before the petition on which the certification is granted; (3) ! Total or partial separation from (3) The total or partial separation the firm or appropriate subdivision occurred after October 2, 1974 and occurred after October 11, 1962 and after the impact date specified in on or after the impact date specified the certification; and in the certification; and (4) The separation occurred before the (4) expiration of the two-year period Same beginning on the date of the most recent applicable certification FORD and before the termination date, if any. Program Benefits Trade Readjustment Allowances * Amounts 65% of worker's average weekly 70% of worker's average weekly wage not to exceed 100% of wage not to exceed 65% of national average weekly manufacturing wage. national average weekly manufacturing ware *Trade Readjustment Allowances are hereafter referred to as TRA. - 3 - Trade Expansion Act of 1962* Trade Act of 1974 Duration of TRA Benefits Maximum of 52 weeks except: Maximum of 52 weeks except: -Workers 60 years of age. and -Workers 60 years of age and older at separation may receive older at separation may receive up to 13 additional weeks of TRA. up to 26 additional weeks of TRA. -Workers in approved training may receive up to 26 additional weeks Same except that workers must of TRA in order to complete training make application for such if enrolled in such training at the training within 180 days of the time their 52-week entitlement date they became eligible to expires. apply for adjustment assistance or the date their benefits became effective, whichever is later. Training and Related Services (1) Appropriate testing, counseling (1) Testing, counseling, placement training and-placement services and supportive services under any provided for under any Federal other Federal law afforded to law shall be afforded to adversely worker through State agency affected workers. Training approved, when appropriate. (2) Subsistence and transportation (2) Same except allowances are allowances for approved training not to exceed $15 per day and outside workers' commuting area not 12 $ per mile. to exceed $5 per day and 10c per mile. GERALD Job Search Allowances ANNUBAT No provisions May be granted to a totally separated worker seeking employment in the U.S. who applies for such allowances not later than one year after his last separation. Such allowances shall reimburse the worker for 80 percent of his necessary job search expenses not to exceed $500. Relocation Allowances May be granted to a totally May be granted to a totally separated separated worker who has obtained head of household who has obtained suitable employment or a bonafide suitable employment or a bonafide offer for such employment within offer for such employment within the the United States. Such allowances United States. Such allowances shall shall pay 80% of reasonable and pay for reasonable and necessary necessary expenses incurred in expenses incurred in transporting transporting the worker and his the worker and his family and a family and a lump sum equivalent lump sum equivalent to two and one- to three times the worker's half times the average weekly average weekly wage up to $500. manufacturing wage. 4 Trade Expansion Act of 1962 Trade Act of 1974 Relationship of TRA to UI (1) State reimbursed for UI payments (1) State pays normal UI for which worker made to worker prior to his con- is eligible. TRA supplements UI to version to TRA status. Full raise allowances to worker to his benefits paid to worker during TRA benefit level. State is not his TRA benefit period from reimbursed for UI paid to eligible Federal funds. worker. (2) Determination and payment of TRA (2) Same applications by individual workers, after certification is made by State employment security agencies as agents of Secretary of Labor. (3) No provisions. (3) Failure of State to enter into agree- ment with Secretary of Labor for payment of TRA to individual workers causes 15 percent loss of tax credit to employers under Federal Unemploy ment Tax Act. (4) No provisions. (4) Secretary of Labor will administer program directly in absence of State agreement. (5) UI may not be denied or reduced (5) Same because of TRA eligibility. (6) State UI law availability and (6) Same disqualification provisions apply to worker subject to regulations of Secretary of Labor. (7) State agency determinations on TRA (7) State agency TRA determinations are applications are reviewable as reviewable on appeal on same basis provided by Secretary's regula- as UI determinations. tions. Payments to States U.S. pays States sums necessary to U.S. pays States sums necessary to pay TRA and to reimburse State for pay TRA. FORD UI paid to worker before shift of worker to TRA status. GURALD Program Financing Program authorized to be funded Program is funded from Ad ustment by appropriation from general Assistance Trust Fund derived funds of the United States. from customs receipts not otherwise appropriated by Congress, and from general funds as to training (including administrative costs). - 5 - Trade Expansion Act of 1962 Trade Act of 1974 Judicial Review No provisions. Within 60 days of notification of a final determination on a petition for adjustment assistance an appeal by a worker or workers aggrieved by the final determination may be filed with the Court of Appeals. General Accounting Office Report No provisions. A Report to the Congress no later than June 30, 1980 evaluating the effectiveness of the adjustment assistance program and the extent to which it was coordinated with other similar programs Trade Monitoring Systemize No provisions. The Secretary of Commerce and Labor are to establish and maintain a program to monitor U.S. imports and the relationship of changes in imports to changes in domestic production and employment. Reports are to be published periodically. Firms Relocating in Foreign Countries No provisions Firms, before moving productive facilities to a foreign country should provide notice of the move to its employees and to the Secretary of Labor and apply for and use all assis- tance for which it is eligible. The firm should offer its workers employment opportunities in the U.S. and assist workers to relocate. TORO ABPUSIT - 6 - Trade Expansion Act of 1962 Trade Act of 1974 Transitional Provisions No provisions. (1) A worker belonging to group certified eligible to apply for TRA under Trade Expansion Act of 1962 may apply for TRA under Trade Act of 1974 unless prior to April 3, 1975 his TRA application was denied for failure to meet Trade Expansion Act qualifying requirements. (2) A worker may receive TRA under Trade Expansion Act of 1962 for weeks prior to April 3, 1975, and under Trade Act of 1974 for weeks thereafter. Weeks for which TRA is paid under Trade Expansion Act of 1962 will be deducted from weeks of potential eligibility under Trade Act of 1974. As the above comparison indicates, the adjustment assistance provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 will ease the qualifying requirements worker groups must meet in order to be determined eligible to apply for adjustment assistance and will also reduce the time between the date the petition is filed and the issuance of a determination. Petitioning The petitioning and investigative processes have been-simplified considerably because the determination of injury as well as the determination of the covered group of workers and the applicable impact date have been consolidated within the Department of Labor. Injury determination and the issuance of a certification must be made within 60 days of the date a petition was filed with the Department of Labor. Prompt filing of petitions is very important because workers whose unemployment occurred before October 3, 1974 or more than one year before the filing date of the petition cannot qualify for adjustment assistance benefits. Also, if workers filing the petition have become unemployed or underemployed before the one year (or before October 3, 1974) cutoff, the petition may be ruled an invalid petition. Certification Criteria The Injury Test The Trade Act of 1974 specifies that workers may be certified eligible to apply for adjustment assistance benefits if increased imports have contributed importantly to the total or partial separation, or threat of total or partial separation, of a significant number or proportion of workers of a firm or subdivision of a firm and to the absolute decline of sales or production of the firm or subdivision. GENALD FORD 7 - Employment Services Workers eligible for adjustment assistance may receive the full range of counseling, testing, placement, and supportive services available through the cooperating state agency for the duration of their adjustment assistance benefit period. Training Appropriate training may be approved for workers when it is determined that suitable employment is not otherwise available. In cases in which approved training is beyond the worker's normal commuting area, subsistence and transportation allowances not to exceed $15 per day and 12ç per mile may be authorized. The Trade Act states that emphasis is to be placed on on-the-job training. Job Search and Relocation Allowances Totally separated workers who are unable to find suitable employment. within their commuting area may be authorized job search allowances to assist them in obtaining employment elsewhere within the United States. Workers may receive up to $500 as reimbursement for 80 percent of their necessary job search expenses. Totally separated workers who are unable to find suitable employment within their commuting area but who have obtained employment or a bonafide offer of employment in another area of the United States may qualify for relocation allowances. The requirement under the Trade Expansion Act that only heads of households could qualify for relocation allowances has been eliminated and the allowances have been modified so as to provide reimbursement of 80 percent of the reasonable and necessary expenses of moving a worker's family and household effects plus a lump sum (up to $500) equal to three times the worker's average weekly wage Only one relocation allowance per family may be granted for the same of FORD relocation. GENALD LIBRARY Relationship of TRA to UI Although TRA and UI are closely related, the rights of workers as individual applicants under the TRA program are (with certain exceptions noted below) generally prescribed by the Trade Act of 1974--a Federal law--rather than by State UI laws. Thus the qualifying requirements a worker must meet, the amount of assistance to which a worker is entitled, permissible reductions in the amount of assistance as a result of earnings or other payments, recoupment of overpayments, criminal penalties for the filing of fraudulent applications, and similar questions are matters as to which the Trade Act of 1974 rather than State UI laws are controlling. To a limited extent, however, the Trade Act of 1974 provides for application of State UI laws to workers applying for TRA. Subject to regulations of the Secretary, State agencies will apply the availability and disqualification provisions of State UI laws in determining - 8 - applications for TRA filed by individual workers, unless such State-law provisions are in conflict with the Trade Act of 1974. The Trade Act of 1974 also provides that State-agency determinations on TRA applications will be subject to review on appeal only in the same manner and to the same extent as UI determinations. If a question arises as to which of the various State UI laws applies to a particular claimant in connection with an issue of availability or disqualification, the State agency will apply the law of the State wherein the worker is entitled to UI or, if the worker is not entitled to UI, the law of the State in which total or partial separation frca employment occurred. The Trade Act of 1974 continues the statutory requirement that UI may not be denied or reduced by reason of an individual's right to TRA. The Act alters in certain other respects, however, the relationship between UI and TRA. Under the old Trade Expansion Act. of 1962 TRA was paid to a worker in effect as a complete substitute for UI. Thus if a State paid a worker UI for weeks of unemployment, and the worker was subsequently found entitled to TRA for the same weeks of unemployment, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 provided that the State would be repaid for all UI paid to the worker for such weeks and also permitted. a State to delete charges to an employer's experience record resulting from the UI payments. Under the Trade Act of 1974 a TRA payment will supplement rather than replace entirely, a payment of UI. Thus a worker who is eligible for UI for weeks of unemployment, and later is found entitled to TRA for the same weeks, will receive the difference between his UI weekly benefit amount and the amount of the TRA payment prescribed by the Trade Act of 1974, but the State will not be reimbursed for UI paid to the worker and charges to the employer's experience record as a result of UI payments will be unaffected by a payment of TRA. The Trade Act of 1974 provides that a 15 percent loss or tax credit to taxpayers under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act will occur if a State agency does not execute an agreement with the Secretary of Labor as to administration of the adjustment assistance program, and authorizes the Secretary to administer the program directly in such a case. These provisions are new. Payments to States The Trade Act of 1974 provides for Federal payments to the States of sums necessary for payment of TRA, but omits the provision of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 which authorized reimbursement of States for UI payments to workers who receive TRA. The 1974 legislation continues existing provisions of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 requiring such payments to be used solely for the purposes for which made, and providing for return of unused sums to the Federal treasury, But specifies that returned funds shall be credited to a new Adjustment Assistance Trust Fund. FORD - 9 Program Financing The new Act creates an "Adjustment Assistance Trust Fund" in the U.S. Treasury and provides that moneys in such fund may be used only to carry out the worker adjustment assistance program including the administrative costs of the program. Moneys in the fund are to be derived from customs receipts not otherwise appropriated by the Congress. In the case of training (including administrative costs) under the Trade Act of 1974, authorization for a general appropriation is included. Transitional Provisions Since the Trade Act of 1974 makes changes in a pre-existing program, provision has been included for groups of workers and individual workers whose petitions or applications are pending on April 3, 1975, the date on which the Trade Act of 1974 will supersede the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 for adjustment assistance purposes A worker who has been receiving TRA prior to April 3, 1975, will remain eligible for TRA thereafter: His entitlement for weeks of unemp loyment beginning before April 3, 1975, will be governed by the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 in all respects. His entitlement for weeks of unemployment beginning thereafter will be governed by the Trade Act of 1974 (for most workers this will mean an increased weekly amount of TRA) except that weeks for which he has received TRA under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 will he subtracted from the total number of weeks for which he may receive TRA under the Trade Act of 1974 Thus a worker who has received 26 weeks of TRA under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 will have such weeks deducted from the 52 weeks for which, in most cases, he could receive TRA under the Trade Act of 1974 A worker who belongs to a group certified as eligible to apply for TRA under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, but who has not received TRA for weeks of unemployment prior to April 3, 1975, may apply for TRA thereafter as if the group to which he belongs had been certified under the Trade Act of 1974. One exception to the foregoing statement exists; the worker may not apply after April 3, 1975, if prior to that date he has filed an application for TRA which has been denied by a State agency for failure to meet the qualifying requirements in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. A group of workers may file a petition for a certification of group eligibility with the Secretary of Labor after April 3, 1975, with respect to weeks of unemp loyment before April 3, 1975, or with respect to weeks of unemployment beginning both before and after April 3, 1975. The Trade Act of 1974 does not permit a certification as to a worker whose total or partial separation occurred more than one year prior to the date on which a petition for a group certification is filed, or occurred prior to six months before April 3, 1975, thus making promptness in filing petitions for group certification advisable. is FORD GERALD LIBRARY May 13, 1975 Department of Labor Participation in Indochina Refugee Program - SUMMARY - CONTINUOUS PARTICIPATION BY DOL-MA-U.S. EMPLOYMENT SERVICE IN BOTH NATIONAL AND BASE INDOCHINA INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE UNDER STATE DEPARTMENT LEADERSHIP IMMEDIATE PRESENCE OF MA/USES STAFF AT ALL BASE LOCATIONS TO INSURE OPTIMUM DOL/STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AGENCY SUPPORT OF REFUGEE RELOCATION PROGRAM. DETERMINE AND FULFILL ROLE IN EMPLOYMENT RELATED PROBLEMS IN SUPPORT OF VOLUNTARY AGENCY CONTRACTS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE - PROVIDE LABOR MARKET INFORMATION (EMPHASIS ON HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT AND LABOR SHORTAGE AREAS) - SURVEY AND DETERMINE OCCUPATION/EMPLOYMENT SKILLS OF REFUGEES IN WORK FORCE TO ASSIST IN RELOCATION EFFORTS. INSURE FULL USE OF STATE DEPARTMENT COMPUTERIZATION EFFORTS--BOTH NATIONAL AND ON EACH BASE--TO PROVIDE STATISTICAL DATA AND ASSIST IN MATCHING FUNCTIONS. - BACKGROUND - The State Department Indochina Interagency Refugee Committee under Ambassador L. Dean Brown and coordinated with DOL, DOD, HEW, HUD, Justice and Interior is striving to provide relocation assistance for up to 130,000 refugees as quickly as possible. About one-third are work force eligibles. The current status of funding and numbers remains fluid but processing continues to move ahead within restraints imposed by clearance problems. Two of the three initial Base locations--Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, with 2,541 and Camp Pendleton, California with 18,646-- are now at capacity. Fort Chaffee, Arkansas will reach maximum of 24,000 today. The number that has now reached the Continental United States is 54,356, with 39,322 at the three reception centers--14,734 have now left Base locations for resettlement. FORD 2 Most refugee families have someone with English speaking capability so they can interpret for other family members. However, interpreters are available at each Base from one of the cooperating agencies to assist with language problems. Early survey results indicate that skill level of work force entrants is highly specialized and some are shortage occupations in certain areas of the United States or other countries. The DOL role of support to voluntary agencies who have the resettlement/relocation responsibility under contract with the State Department can now proceed as quickly as the voluntary agencies have operational capabilities. Specialized staff as needed will be made available at each Base location through the State Employment Security system to assist in classification and other manpower functions as identified. Computerization of refugee data has not yet been established although this support should be operational this week. This effort is being handled by the Department of State. However, USES representative at Camp Pendleton reviewed the 223 Head of Family forms processed -up to 2:00 P.M. Sunday, May 4, and secured the following occupational/employment skill information: 29% Professional or Business 14% Skilled workers 15% Clerical workers 2% Journalists 10% Housewives 14% Students 3% Military 1% Agricultural workers 12% Not specified FORD i LIBRARY 078839 FORD / LIBRAR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20212 MAY 1 6 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY Subject: Job Leavers, Reentrants, and New Entrants Previously, we have reported to you on job losers during this recession. (See my memo of April 15.) This study showed that about 70 percent of the added unemployed had lost their last job, and that the principal factor determining job loss in this recession has been a person's industry attachment rather than sex, color, or age. We now turn to an analysis of the added unemployment of the counterparts to job losers: (1) job leavers, (2) reentrants, and (3) new entrants. Job losers, of course, are unemployed because they lost their last job, either through discharge or layoff. Job leavers, by contrast, have left their last job voluntarily and immediately initiated a search for another. New and reentrants are distinguished from job losers and job leavers by the fact that they do not have a job attach- ment at the time they begin seeking work but rather entered the jobless ranks from outside the labor force. The only difference between the two is that reentrants have had previous labor force experience while new entrants are seeking their first job. About 800,000 job leavers, reentrants, and new entrants were added to the unemployment rolls since the fourth quarter of 1973, as can be seen in table 1. This compares with about 2.4 million job losers. The primary reason for an increase in the number of unemployed reentrants during a cyclical downturn is that those entering the work force at this time are more likely to encounter unemployment and/or remain unemployed longer than if they entered in more normal times. The total flow of reentrants into the job market also may increase somewhat during such times simply because of the need on the part of so-called "second workers" to replace the earnings lost due to layoff of the principal family breadwinner. SALE FORD LIBRARY The Secretary--2 Table 1. Jobless persons by reasons for unemployment (In thousands, seasonally adjusted) 1973 1975 Reasons Change IV I Absolute Percent Total unemployed 4,265 7,664 3,399 80 Lost last job 1,648 4,072 2,424 147 Left last job 738 763 25 3 Reentering labor force 1,250 1,821 571 46 Seeking first job 603 826 223 37 Note: Individual items may not add to totals because of independent seasonal adjustment and rounding In terms of demographic composition, the unemployed reentrants' group differs significantly from the job losers' group. As shown in table 2, this group consists largely of women, many of whom have to interrupt their work careers for family reasons, and youths, who may be reentering the labor force after a stint in school or in the Armed Forces. Table 2. Percent distribution of the unemployed by sex and age, 1974 annual averages Job Job New Sex and age Losers leavers Reentrants entrants Total 100 100 100 100 Males, 16-19 years 8 12 16 36 Males, 20-24 years 15 14 11 5 Males, 25 years and over 42 22 13 2 Females, 16-19 years. 4 11 14 42 Females, 20-24 years. 7 16 14 9 Females, 25 years and over 23 25 32 6 New entrant unemployment is closely related to population growth and the rising trend in labor force participation of young people. As shown above, four out of every five new-entrant unemployed are youths 16 to 19, a group whose population has expanded rapidly over the past decade and whose labor force rate, at 54.8 percent in the first quarter of 1975, was over 10 percentage points higher than it was a decade ago. The Secretary-- 3 Job-leaver unemployment has not shown a cyclical response during this period. The number of such unemployed has remained virtually unchanged at about 750,000--since late 1973. A normal reluctance on the part of workers to leave their jobs in search for another in times of job scarcity suggests that this group might be expected to decline in number during recessions. The quit rate for manufacturing workers declines during recessions (it dropped from 2.7 percent in the last quarter of 1973 to 1.2 percent in early 1975). Of course, when viewed as a proportion of total unemployment, job-leaver joblessness has indeed moved contra- cyclically. (It would appear that the job-leaver category is mainly measuring quits that arise from such factors as family relocations, migration generally, and institutional factors such as college students leaving part-time jobs at the end of the school year.) As shown in table 3, the job-loser category of unemployed that which has shown by far the greatest increase during the current recession-- contains a large proportion of household heads. The other reasons groups contain much smaller proportions of household heads, with the new entrants' group being made up almost entirely of "other household members, likely to be the young sons and daughters of household heads. Table 3. Percent distribution of the unemployed by household status, 1974 annual averages Job Job New Household status losers leavers Reentrants entrants Total 100 100 100 100 Male household head 42 22 14 2 Wife of head 17 25 31 7 Female household head 9 10 10 3 Other household members 32 43 45 88 As shown in table 4, blacks are overrepresented among all categories of the unemployed. Though accounting for only one-tenth of the Nation's labor force, they represented close to one-fifth of all the categories of unemployed. FORD The Secretary 4 Table 4. Percent distribution of the unemployed by race, 1974 annual averages Total Job Job New Race unemployment losers leavers Reentrants entrants Total 100 100 100 100 100 Whites 80 81 84 79 74 Blacks 20 19 16 21 26 An analysis of job losers, job leavers, reentrants, and new entrants will be issued soon in a report in the BLS "Employment in Perspective" series. Julius RLIUS Commissioner SHISKIN Shiskin 23412 FORD CIBARA NEWS U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF INFORMATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20210 Washington, D. C.- 20212 USDL - 75-297 C. Rosenfeld (202) 961 - 2680 For Release: Sunday Editions K. D. Hoyle (202) 961 - 2913 May 25, 1975 home: 333 - 1384 YOUTH LABOR FORCE PROJECTED TO INCREASE BY 4.2 MILLION BETWEEN SPRING AND SUMMER About 4.2 million youths--roughly the same number as last year--will enter the labor force in the summer of 1975, according to projections published today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor. Each summer the school-age labor force 16 to 24 years old increases sharply as students enter the job market for summer work and as high school and college graduates take or look for regular jobs. By July 1975, the labor force age 16 to 24 is expected to reach 25.3 million, about 550, 000 greater than in July 1974. This projected increase assumes a continuation of recent trends in labor force participa- tion rates. Students entering the labor force for summer work are projected to total about 2. 7 million or 64 percent of the expected total increase from April to July. The rest, 1.5 million, will be high school and college graduates entering the work force on a permanent basis. Excluded from the latter estimate are 760, 000 students who were already in the work force in April (most of them employed part time) and who will be shifting to full-time labor market participation in July after they complete school. The data in this release are based on statistics obtained for the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Bureau of the Census in its Current Population Survey. Detailed information on the labor force status of the population may be found in Employment and Earnings. (more) FORD Estimated Summertime Increase in Civilian Labor Force 16 to 24 Years Old, by Age, 1975 (Numbers in thousands) 16 to 24 16 to 21 years 22 to 24 Date Total 16 to 19 20 to 21 years years years years 1975 April (actual) 21,101 13,164 8,024 5,140 7,937 July (estimate) 25,274 16,973 11,056 5,917 8,301 Estimated increase in labor force, April to July 4,173 3,809 3,032 777 364 1974 (Actual) April 20,592 12,990 7,959 5,031 7,602 July 24,725 16,770 11,039 5,731 7,955 Increase in labor force, April to July 4,133 3,780 3,080 700 353 Over-the-year change in labor force April 1974-April 1975 (actual) 509 174 65 109 335 July 1974-July 1975 (estimate) 549 203 17 186 346 # # # FORD it LIBRAR STVN U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LADOR OFFICE 05 INFORMATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20210 Contact: Office (202) 376-6905 USDL 75-303 Jack Hashian Home (703) 938-2343 FOR RELEASE: IMMEDIATE Philip Mason Wednesday, May 28, 1975 Home (703) 560-3772 RALPH E. HALL TO HEAD VETERANS EMPLOYMENT SERVICE Secretary of Labor John T. Dunlop today announced the appointment of Ralph E. Hall as Director of the Veterans' Employment Service (VES) For the past four years Hall, 51, directed the De- partment's Veterans' Reemployment Rights program. He was formerly the executive director and national commander of AMVETS (American Veterans of World War II). As Director of the VES, he will provide program and policy direction for a wide range of job placement services for veterans through the Manpower Administration's U. S. Employment Service. Additionally, he will supervise some 150 veterans employment representatives working with the Federal-State public employment service system, which pro- vides veterans with services such as counseling, testing, and referral to jobs and training. (MORE) FORD LIBKARY 2 Hall was national commander of AMVETS in 1966 and was its executive director in 1971 when he joined the Labor Department. His positions in the AMVETS ranged from post commander and state commander in Massachusetts to national finance officer and chairman of the national headquarters building committee. In 1967, Hall was appointed by the President to the U. S. Veterans Advisory Commission to conduct a comprehensive study of the benefits system for veterans, their families and survivors as administered by the Veterans Administration. During World War II, he served as an Army combat engineer in the South Pacific. His two brothers, Harold and Raymond, as well as his brother-in-law, Herbert Houghton, were killed in action during the war. After the war, Hall graduated from the University of New Hampshire, was employed as a salesman and, in 1951, as a real estate dealer in North Attleboro, Mass., where he became active in Lorden-Hall AMVETS Post 65, named in memory of his two brothers. Hall is married to the former Anne Houghton of North Attleboro, the 1962 National AMVETS auxiliary president She FORD LIBRARY (MORE) - 3 - is presently a teacher specialist in the Montgomery County school system. The Halls have two sons: Ralph, Jr., 24, a student at Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minn., and Harold, 21, a student at Montgomery College, Rockville, Md. # # # # 3 FORD LIBRAST OFFICE OF INFORMATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20210 CONTACT: E. Wadlow (202) 523-8743 USDL 75-298 AFTER HOURS 9703) 256-8859 FOR RELEASE: IMMEDIATE, WEDNESDAY May 28, 1975 ROBERT C. CHASE APPOINTED DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF LABOR FOR EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS Secretary of Labor John T. Dunlop today announced the appointment of Robert C. Chase as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment Standards. In this position, Chase will assist in carrying out the responsibilities of the Department's Employment Standards Administration (ESA). These responsibilities include: enforcement of federal minimum wage, overtime, equal pay, child labor, age discrimi- nation and wage garnishment laws and administration of federal workers' compensation statutes and equal employment opportunity programs for members of minority groups, women, handicapped workers and Vietnam-era and disabled veterans. Chase joined the Labor Department in May 1969 and since June 1974, has been program adviser to the Under Secretary of Labor. He also has been serving as the Under Secretary's acting Executive Assistant since November 1974. FORD -more- - 2 - Other Labor Department positions which Chase has held include: Director of the Special Projects Staff in the Office of the Under Secretary; Deputy Director of the Welfare Reform Planning Staff in the same office, and Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Policy, Evaluation and Research. Before joining the Labor Department, Chase worked for the Agency for International Development (AID) as an economist and technical assistance coordinator for assistance programs to Turkey and later as chief of AID's Capital Development and Private Enterprise Division for five South Asian countries. Chase served in the Peace Corps from August 1961 until August 1963, after working as a management intern in the Executive Office, Secretary of Navy. Born on October 27, 1937, in Boston, Massachusetts, Chase received a bachelor of arts degree from Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut (1959), and a master's degree in public administration from Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York (1960). He and his wife, the former Joan Stanford, reside in Alexandria, Virginia. They have two children, Linda and Robert. 5 #### LIBRARY 5-28-75 JTD Youth Education and Labor Market Facts Population * Between 1960 and 1973 the population of youth aged 16-19 increased 53.7 percent, from 10.306 million to 15.843 million. * The population growth of 16-19 year olds will level off and decline in the next 10 years or SO. - Between 1970 to 1980 the number of people in the 16-19 age bracket is projected to decline by about a million from 15.0 to 14.1 million. - Between 1980 and 1985 the number of people in this age bracket is expected to decline even further to about 13.8 million. * The population growth of 16-19 year old blacks has been increasing at a higher rate than for whites (62.6% for blacks compared to 35.1% for whites between 1963 and 1973) and is projected to continue to increase 17.9% between 1970 and 1985 while the white population in this age bracket will be declining. Educational Preparation * New full-time labor force entrants (16-24 years of age) have the following educational attainment: - 20% enter with 4 years of college - 30% enter with 1-3 years of college - 35% enter with a high school degree - 15% enter as high school dropouts GERALD FORD -2- Labor Force Participation * Between 1960 and 1973 the size of the labor force aged 16-19 years increased by 78.4%, from 4.656 million to 8.309 million. * Between 1960 and 1973 the size of the student 16-19 year old labor force who were enrolled in school increased by 130.4 percent, from 1.892 million to 4.360 million. * The large growth in this student labor force resulted not only from population growth but also from an increase in student labor force participation rates. - In 1960 29.5 percent of 16-19 year old students were in the labor force (i.e. either working or looking for work). - In 1973 the labor force participation rate of 16-19 year old students was 41.5 percent. * Labor force participation rates for 16-19 year old blacks have been declining somewhat--down for students from 23.4 in 1962 to 20.8 in 1972, down for non-students from 67.8 -in 1962 to 64.7 in 1972. Unemployment * The unemployment rate of 16-19 year olds has changed very little over the long term (it was 13.3 percent in 1960 and 13.5 in 1973), but it has changed markedly during short-term swings in business cycles (it was 20.9 percent in March 1975). * The ratio of the unemployment rate of 16-19 year olds to that of adults (20 years and over) has been increasing over the long term. The ratio was 3 to 1 in 1960; and 3.8 to 1 in 1973. FORD LIERARY 9788 -3- * A large proportion of the unemployment of 16-19 year olds is attributable to their intermittant attachment to the labor force. - In 1971 nearly three-fourths of the unemployed 16-19 group were either reentrants or new entrants rather than job leavers or losers. In contrast, only one-third of the unemployed 20 and over group were reentrants or new entrants. * Unemployment among 16-19 year olds in school has increased over the long term. In 1960 their unemployment rate was 10.0 percent; in 1973 it was 14.9 percent. * The 16-19 year old black unemployment rate has been increasing steadily in absolute terms and in comparison with that of 16-19 year old whites. - In the past 20 years the unemployment rate of blacks 16-19 has doubled (16.5% in 1954; 30.2% in 1973) while the rate for whites 16-19 has virtually not increased (12.1% in 1954; 12.6% in 1973). - The ratio of black to white 16-19 unemployment rates was 1.4 in 1954; by 1973 it had increased to 2.4. * The unemployment situation of black 16-19 year old boys has been deteriorating faster than that of black girls. - In 1954 the rate for black boys (14.4) was nearly the same as for white boys (13.3). However, the rate for black girls (20.1) was then far higher than that of boys either race and of white girls (10.4). - By 1973 the rate of black boys had become more than double that of white boys (26.7% to 12.3%). The rate of black girls, starting from a higher base, did not increase as much proportionately. FORD LIBRARY 0778 -4- Employment * Employment of 16-19 year olds increased 78.1 percent between 1960 and 1973, matching the increase in the labor force. * More and more young people are starting out as part-time or part year workers. - In 1973 5 out of 10 working 16-19 year olds were in school and worked part-time and/or part year. In 1960, 4 out of 10 were in school. Three quarters of the 1972 high school seniors worked during their last year in high school, with more than one-third working at least 20 hours a week. * Recent high school graduates are concentrated in unskilled and semi-skilled occupations. With experience and "aging", some shift to skilled occupations. OCCUPATIONS OF 1966 MALE HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES IN YEARS IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADUATION (by percent) 6 mos. 2½ years 3½1/2 years Occupation (Oct. '66) (Oct. '68) (Oct. '69) Professionals, 4.8 15.1 25.8 Technical, Managerial Clerical and 16.6 14.3 15.2 Sales Craftmen 10.8 18.3 19.7 Operatives 35.9 36.6 27.0 Services 5.3 2.5 4.5 Laborer 27.0 13.3 7.8 (includes farm) FORD -5- * Employment of 16-19 year olds increases substantially each summer during school vacations. However, in recent years due to the greater labor force participation of this age group during the school year the summer bulge has moderated somewhat. CHANGE IN TEENAGE (16-19) EMPLOYMENT FROM APRIL TO JULY (in thousands) April July Absolute Percent Year level level Change Change 1970 5,669 7,919 2,250 40 1971 5,731 8,040 2,309 40 1972 6,186 8,552 2,366 38 1973 6,666 9,054 2,388 36 1974 6,929 9,188 2,259 33 FORD Table E-2. Total Population, Total Labor Force, and Labor Force Participation Rates, by Sex and Age, 1960 to 1990 [Numbers in thousands) Labor force participation rates, Total population, July 1 Total labor force, annual averages annual averages (percent of population in labor force) Sex and age Actual Projected Actual Projected Actual Projected 1960 1970 1980 1985 1990 1960 1970 1980 1985 1990 1960 1970 1980 1985 1990 BOTH SEXES 16 years and over 121,817 142,366 167,339 175,722 183,079 72,104 85,903 101,809 107,716 112,576 59.2 60.3 60. 61.3 61. MALE 16 years and over 59,420 68,641 80,261 84,285 87,911 48,933 54,343 62,590 66,017 68,907 82.4 79.2 78.0 78.3 78. 4 16 to 19 years 5,398 7,649 8,339 7,141 7,045 3,162 4,395 4,668 3.962 3,901 58.6 57.5 56.0 55.5 55.4 20 to 24 years 5,553 8,668 10,666 10,305 9,021 4.939 7,378 8,852 8,496 7,404 88.9 85.1 83.0 82. 4 82.1 25 to 34 years 11,347 12,601 18,521 20,540 21.010 10,940 11,974 17.523 19,400 19,853 96.4 95.0 94.6 94. 4 94.4 35 to 44 years 11,878 11,303 12,468 15,400 15,378 11,454 10,818 11,851 14,617 17,398 96.4 95.7 95.1 94.9 94.7 45 to 54 years 10,148 11,283 10,781 10,630 11,922 9,568 10,487 9,908 9,744 10,909 94.3 92.9 91.9 91.7 91.5 55 to 64 years 7,564 8,742 9,776 9,674 9,424 6,445 7,127 7,730 7,716 7,307 85.2 81.5 79.1 78.1 7.5 55 to 59 years 4.144 4,794 5,263 5,129 4,787 3,727 4,221 4,558 4,421 4,112 59.9 88.0 $6.6 86.2 85.9 60 to 64 years 3,420 3,948 4,513 4,745 4,637 2,718 2,906 3,172 3,295 3,195 79.5 73.6 70.3 69. 68.9 65 years and over 7,530 8,395 9,710 10,356 11,081 2,425 2,164 2,058 2,082 2,135 32.2 25.8 21.2 20.0 19.3 65 to 60 years 2,941 3,139 3,633 3,852 4,005 1,348 1,278 1,289 1,322 1,365 45.8 40.7 35.5 34.3 33.6 70 years and over 4,590 5,256 6,077 6,534 7,016 1,077 886 769 760 770 23.5 16.9 12.7 11.6 11.0 FEMALE 16 years and over 62,397 73,725 87,078 91.437 95,168 23.171 31,560 39,219 41,699 43,669 37.1 42.8 45.0 45.6 45.9 16 to 19 years 5,275 7,432 8,057 6,910 6,777 2,061 3,250 3,669 3,203 3,188 39.1 43.7 45.5 46.4 47.0 20 to 24 years 5,547 8,508 10,401 10,049 8,801 2,558 4,893 6,592 6,523 5,826 46.1 57.5 63.4 64.9 66.2 25 to 34 years 11,605 12,743 18,442 20,301 20,750 4,159 5,704 9,256 10,339 10,678 35.8 44.8 50.2 50.9 51.5 35 to 44 years 12,348 11,741 12,903 15,741 18,524 5,325 5,971 6,869 8,560 10,219 43.1 50.9 53.2 54.4 55.2 45 to 54 years 10,438 12,106 11,625 11,407 12,695 5,150 6,533 6,537 6,542 7,364 49.3 54.0 56.2 57.4 58.0 55 to 64 years 8,070 9,763 11,307 11,492 10,934 2,964 4,153 5,057 5,213 5,003 36.7 42.5 447 45.4 45.8 55 to 59 years 4.321 5,237 5,966 5,804 5,396 1,803 2,547 3,055 3,033 2,853 41.7 48.4 51.2 52.3 52.9 60 to GA years 3,749 4,506 5,341 5,688 5.538 1,161 1,606 2,002 2,180 2,150 31.0 35.6 37.5 38.3 34.8 65 years and over 9,115 11,433 14,343 15,537 16,687 954 1,056 1,239 1,319 1,391 10.5 0.2 8.6 8.5 8.3 65 to 69 years 3,347 3,780 4,595 4,912 5,267 579 644 758 814 864 17.0 16.4 16.5 16.5 16. 4 70 years and over 5,768 7,653 9,748 10,595 11,420 375 412 481 505 527 5.4 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.6 SOURCE: Population data from the Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Series E. All other data from the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Census, Current Population Reports. Series P-25: for 1960, No. 211; for 1970. Statistics. Special Labor Force Report No. 156. estimates from the Current Population Survey; for 1980 to 1990, No. 493, FORD SCHALD LIBRARY Source: See source. table E-2 309 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table E-4. Total Population, Total Labor Force, and Labor Force Participation Rates, by Color, Sex, and Age, 1960 to 1985 [Numbers in thousands) Total population, July 1 Total labor force, annual averages Labor force participation rates, annual averages (percent) Color, ses, and age Actual Projected Actual Projected Actual Projected 1960 1970 1975 1980 1985 1960 1970 1975 1980 1985 1960 1970 1975 1980 1985 TOTAL 16 years and over 121,817 142,366 154,318 166,554 176,282 72,104 85,908 92,792 100,727 107,156 59.2 60.3 60.1 60.5 60.8 WHITE Both sexes 16 years and over 109,279 126,781 136,915 146,919 154,651 64,210 76,376 82,101 88,634 93,738 58.8 60.2 60.0 60.3 60.6 Male 16 years and over 53,408 61,271 66,167 70,997 74,729 44,119 48,835 52,518 56,374 59,616 82.6 79.7 79.4 79.4 79.8 16 to 19 years 4,763 6,614 7,245 7,300 6,520 2,801 3,901 4,166 4,193 3,722 58.8 59.0 57.5 57.4 57.1 20 to 24 years 4,905 7,593 8,434 9,117 9,040 4,370 6,493 7,058 7,399 7,497 89.1 85.5 83.7 83.3 82.9 25 to 34 years 10,092 11,145 13,867 16,209 17,674 9,777 10,671 13,387 15,646 17,062 96.9 95.7 96.5 96.5 96.5 35 to 44 years 10,675 10,085 9,865 11,179 13,828 10,346 9,722 9,528 10,791 13,343 96.9 96.4 96.6 96.5 96.5 45 to 54 years 9,166 10,193 10,221 9,624 9,437 8,690 9,553 9,648 9,078 8,897 04.8 93.7 94.4 94.3 94.3 55 to 64 years 6,874 7,952 8,432 8,855 8,904 5,892 6,518 6,858 7,152 7,129 85.7 82.0 81.3 80.8 80.1 65 years and over 6,933 7,688 8,100 8,713 9,324 2,243 1,977 1,873 1,915 1,966 32.4 25.7 23.1 22.0 21.1 Female 16 years and over 55,871 65,510 70,748 75,922 79,923 20,091 27,541 29,583 32,260 34,122 36.0 42.0 41.8 42.5 42.7 16 to 19 years 4,630 6,392 7,003 7,001 6,244 1,853 2,897 2,928 2,935 2,585 40.0 45.3 41.8 41.9 41.4 20 to 24 years 4,842 7,408 8,231 8,897 8,758 2,215 4,263 4,659 5,110 5,040 45.7 57.5 56.6 57.4 57.5 25 to 34 years 10,172 11,152 13,749 16,005 17,436 3,451 4,796 5,973 7,204 8,025 33.9 43.0 43.4 45.0 46.0 35 to 44 years 11,017 10,300 9,970 11,252 13,830 4,537 5,115 5,017 5,846 7,330 41.2 49.7 50.3 520 53.0 45 to 54 years 9,404 10,846 10,847 10,087 9,820 4,532 5,783 5,800 5,496 5,400 48.2 53.3 53.5 54.5 55.0 55 to 64 years 7,357 8,860 9,579 10,201 10,236 2,633 3,735 4,216 4,595 4,596 35.8 42.2 44.0 45.0 44.9 65 years and over 8,449 10,553 11,370 12,482 13,599 870 952 990 1,074 1,146 10.3 9.0 8.7 8.6 8.4 NEGRO AND OTHER RACES Both BEICS 16 years and over 12,538 15,585 17,403 19,635 21,631 7,894 9,526 10,691 12,093 13,418 63.0 61.1 61.4 61.6 62.0 Male 16 years and over 6,011 7,370 8,262 9,336 10,299 4,814 5,507 6,358 7,238 8,102 80.1 74.7 77.0 77.5 78.7 16 to 19 years 635 1,035 1,180 1,325 1,229 361 493 616 702 651 56.8 47.6 52.2 53.0 53.0 20 to 24 years 648 1,076 1,307 1,479 1,634 569 885 1,066 1,196 1,309 87.8 82.2 81.6 80.9 80.1 25 to 34 years 1,255 1,456 1,852 2,348 2,744 1,163 1,303 1,713 2,169 2,539 92.7 89.5 920 92.4 92.5 35 to 44 years 1,203 1,217 1,217 1,397 1,802 1,108 1,095 1,122 1,295 1,677 92.1 90.0 92.2 92.7 93.1 45 to 54 years 982 1,090 1,126 1,102 1,117 878 934 1,018 1,004 1,024 89.4 85.7 90.4 91.1 91.7 55 to 64 years 690 790 835 890 924 553 609 654 697 723 80.1 77.1 78.3 78.3 78.2 65 years and over 598 706 735 794 850 182 188 169 175 179 30.4 26.6 23.0 22.0 21.1 Female 16 years and over 6,527 8,215 0,141 10,290 11,332 3,080 4,019 4,333 4,855 5,316 47.2 48.9 47.4 47.1 46.9 16 to 19 years 645 1,041 1,185 1,313 1,218 208 353 447 514 481 32.2 33.9 37.7 39.1 39.5 20 to 24 years 705 1,100 1,327 1,504 1,636 343 630 779 881 957 48.7 57.3 58.7 58.6 58.5 25 to 34 years 1,433 1,591 1,946 2,435 2,846 708 908 996 1,223 1,406 49.4 57.1 51.2 50.2 49.4 35 to 44 years 1,331 1,440 1,406 1,549 1,924 788 855 785 862 1,067 59.2 59.4 53.8 55.6 55.5 45 to 54 years 1,034 1,260 1,338 1,335 1,331 618 750 768 763 755 59.8 59.5 57.4 57.2 56.7 55 to 64 years 713 902 985 1,086 1,172 331 419 461 508 538 46.4 46.5 46.8 46.8 45.9 65 years and over 666 880 953 1,075 1,204 84 104 97 104 112 12.6 11.8 10.2 9.7 9.3 SOURCE: Population data from the Department of Commerce, Bureau of All other data from the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-25: for 1960, No. 241; for Special Labor Force Report No. 119. These data antedate the projections 1970, estimates from the Current Population Survey: for 1975-85, No. 381, shown in tables E-1 through E-3 and E-7 because revised projections of Series C. population and labor force by color are not yet available. FORD 1975 Manpower Report of the President LIBRARY 310 Table B-11. Median Years of School Completed by the Civilian Labor Force, by Sex and Age, Selected Dates, 1952-74 16 and 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 43 to 54 55 to 64 65 years Sex and date years years years years years years and over Born SEXES October 1952 (1) 12. 2 12.1 11. 4 8.8 8. 3 March 1957 (1) 12 3 12. 2 12. 0 9.5 8.5 March 1959 (1) 12. 3 12. 3 12. 1 10. 8 8. 9 8.6 March 1962 (1) 12. 4 12. 4 12.2 11. 6 9.4 8.8 March 1964 (1) 12. 4 12. 4 12. 2 12. 0 10. 0 8.9 March 1965 (1) 12. 4 12.5 12. 3 12. 0 10. 3 8.9 March 1968 € 12. 5 12. 5 12. 3 12. 1 10. 4 9.1 March 1967 (1) 12. 5 12. 5 12. 3 12. 1 10. 8 9.0 March 1968 E 12. 5 12. 5 12. 4 12. 2 11. 1 9.3 March 1969 E 12. 5 12. 6 12. 4 12. 3 11. 4 9.3 March 1970 (1) 12. 6 12. 6 12. 4 12. 3 11. 8 96 March 1971 (1) 12. 6 12. 6 12. 4 12. 3 12. 0 9.9 March 1972 10. 4 12. 6 12. 7 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 10. 2 March 1973 10. 4 12. 6 12. 7 12. 5 12. 4 12. 1 10. 5 March 1974 10.4 12. 6 12. 8 12. 5 12. 4 12. 1 10.9 MALE October 1952 (1) 11. 5 12. 1 11. 2 8. 7 a. 2 March 1957 (1) 12. 1 12. 2 11. 8 9.0 8.4 March 1959 E 12.1 12.3 12.1 10. 4 8.8 8.5 March 1962 (1) 12. 3 12. 4 12. 2 11. 1 9.0 8.7 March 1964 (1) 12.3 12. 4 12. 2 11. 6 9.3 8.8 March 1965 (1) 12. 3 12. 5 12. 3 11. 7 9.6 8.8 March 1966 (1) 12. 4 12. 5 12. 3 11. 9 9.7 8.9 March 1967 (1) 12. 4 12. 5 12. 3 12. 1 10. 4 8.9 March 1968 (1) 12. 4 12. 5 12. 4 12. 2 10. 6 9.0 March 1969 (1) 12. 4 12.6 12. 4 12. 2 10. 9 9.0 March 1970 E 12 5 12. 6 12. 4 12 3 11. 2 9.0 March 1971 (1) 12 6 12. 6 12. 5 12. 3 11. 5 9.1 March 1972 10. 4 12. 6 12.7 12. 5 12. 3 11. 9 9.6 March 1973 10.4 12. 6 12.7 12. 6 12. 4 12. 1 10. 1 March 1974 10. 4 12. 6 12. 8 12. 6 12. 4 12. 1 10. 7 FEMALE October 1952 (1) 12. 4 12. 2 11. 9 9.2 8.8 March 1957 E 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 10. 8 8. 8 March 1959 (1) 12. 4 12. 3 12. 2 11. 7 10. 0 8. 8 March 1962 (1) 12. 5 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 10. 7 9.0 March 1964 (1) 12. 5 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 11. 2 10. 2 March 1965 (1) 12. 5 12. 4 12. 3 12. 2 11. 5 9.8 March 1966 (1) 12. 6 12. 5 12. 3 12. 2 11. 6 10. 4 March 1967 (1) 12. 6 12. 5 12. 3 12. 2 11. 6 10. 1 March 1968 e 12. 6 12.5 12. 3 12. 3 12. 0 10. 3 March 1969 3 12. 6 12. 5 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 10. 2 March 1970 (1) 12. 6 12.1 5 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 10. 9 March 1971 (1) 12. 7 12. 6 12. 4 12. 3 12. 1 11. 0 March 1972 10.5 12.6 12. 6 12. 4 12. 4 12. 2 11. 2 March 1973 10. 5 12. 7 12. 7 12. 5 12. 4 12. 2 11. 3 March 1974 10.5 12.7 12.7 12. 5 12. 4 12. 3 11. 1 1 Not available. FORD LIBRARY 1975 Manpower Report of the President 268 Table E-11. Projected Educational Attainment of the Civilian Labor Force 16 Years and Over, by Sex and Age, 1980 and 1990 [Numbers In thousands) 25 years and over Total, Years of school completed. sex, and year 16 years 16 to 20 to and over 19 years 24 years Total, 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 25 years years years years years and over and over 1980 BOTH SEXES Total: Number 99,809 8,098 14,484 77,227 26,299 18,450 16,397 12,784 3,297 Percent 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Less than 4 years of high school 1 27.3 58.3 12.6 26.9 16.0 24.4 33.4 37.4 51.9 4 years of high school or more 72.7 41.8 87.4 73.2 83.9 75.6 66.5 62.6 48.1 Elementary: Less than 5 years 1 1.3 .7 .6 1.5 .3 .9 24 2.5 5.4 5 to 7 years 3.3 1.4 1.5 3.9 1.2 3.0 5.3 6.4 12.8 8 years 5.4 2.6 1.9 6.4 26 4.5 8.2 11.1 19.2 High school: 1 to 3 years 17.3 53.6 8.6 15.1 11.9 16.0 17.5 17.4 14.5 4 years 40.4 33.7 42.3 40.7 42.2 42.9 40.1 39.4 25.6 College: 1 to 3 years 15.9 8.0 30.5 14.0 17.6 13.9 11.3 11.1 9.0 4 years 9.7 .1 11.5 10.4 13.4 10.7 8.5 7.0 6.7 5 years or more 6.7 3.1 8.1 10.7 8.1 6.6 5.1 6.8 Median years of school completed 12.6 11.5 12.9 12.6 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.3 11.6 MALE Total: Number 60,630 4,437 7,910 48,283 17,052 11,584 9,862 7,727 2,058 Percent 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Less than 4 years of high school 1 28.5 63.2 15.3 27.4 15.9 24.4 35.5 39.9 54.9 4 years of high school or more 71.6 36.9 84.7 72.6 84.2 75.7 64.6 60.2 45.1 Elementary: Less than 5 years 1 1.6 .7 .7 1.8 .4 1.1 3.2 3.0 5.8 5 to 7 years 3.8 1.7 1.9 4.3 1.4 3.5 6.2 7.1 14.1 8 years 6.1 3.3 2.3 6.9 3.1 4.8 9.3 12.1 20.4 High school: 1 to 3 years 17.0 57.5 10.4 14.4 11.0 15.0 16.8 17.7 14.6 4 years 37.2 29.1 40.2 37.6 40.7 39.3 34.9 34.8 23.3 College: 1 to 3 years 16.3 7.7 31.0 14.7 18.5 14.8 11.8 11.7 8.0 4 years 9.8 .1 10.0 10.5 12.5 11.4 9.7 7.5 6.5 5 years or more 8.3 3.5 9.8 12.5 10.2 8.2 6.2 7.3 Median years of school completed 12.6 11.3 12.9 12.6 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.3 11.0 FEMALE Total: Number 39,179 3,661 6.574 28,944 9,247 6,866 6,535 5.057 1.239 Percent 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Less than 4 years of high school 1 25.7 52.2 9.4 26.1 16.7 24.5 30.4 33.8 47.0 4 years of high school or more 74.5 47.9 90.6 74.1 83.4 75.5 60.6 66.2 53.0 Elementary: Less than 5 years I .9 .6 .6 1.0 .2 .5 1.1 1.8 4.8 5 to 7 years 2.6 1.0 1.0 3.2 1.0 2.3 4.0 5.5 10.6 8 years 4.4 1.7 1.3 5.5 1.8 3.9 6.6 9.6 17.2 High school: 1 to 3 years 17.8 48.9 6.5 16.4 13.7 17.8 18.7 16.9 14.4 4 years 45.3 39.4 44.7 46.1 44.9 48.9 48.1 46.3 29.4 College: 1 to 3 years 15.2 8.4 30.0 12.7 15.9 12.4 10.6 10.3 10.7 4 years 9.6 .1 13.3 10.0 15.1 9.6 6.8 6.0 7.0 5 years or more 4.4 2.6 5.3 7.5 4.6 4.1 3.6 5.9 Median years of school completed 12.5 11.9 12.9 12.5 12.7 12.5 12.4 12.3 12.1 Footuote at end of table. FORD SALD 1975 Manpower Report of the President 315 Table A-3. Civilian Labor Force for Persons 16 Years and Over, by Sex, Color, and Age: Annual Averages, 1947-74 [Thousands] Total, 16 16 and 17 18 and 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 14 and Item years and years years years years years years years and over 15 years over MALE 1947 42,686 1,106 1,382 4,629 10,207 9,492 7,847 5,647 2,376 586 1948 43,286 1,109 1,491 4,674 10,327 9,596 7,942 5,764 2,384 572 1949 43,498 1,056 1,421 4,681 10,410 9,722 8,008 5,748 2,454 577 1950 43,819 1,047 1,457 4,632 10,527 9,793 8,117 5,794 2,434 623 1951 43,001 1,080 1,266 3,935 10,375 9,798 8,204 5,874 2,469 611 1952 42,869 1,101 1,210 3,338 10,585 9,945 8,326 5,950 2,415 585 1953 43,633 1,070 1,249 3,054 10,737 10,436 8,570 5,974 2,544 561 1954 43,965 1,024 1,273 3,052 10,772 10,513 8,703 6,105 2,525 572 1955 44,475 1,070 1,299 3,221 10,805 10,595 8,839 6,122 2,526 566 1956 45,091 1,142 1,292 3,485 10,685 10,663 9,002 6,220 2,603 665 1957 45,197 1,127 1,290 3,626 10,571 10,731 9,153 6,222 2,478 685 1958 45,521 1,133 1,295 3,771 10,475 10,843 9,330 6,304 2,379 676 1939 45,886 1,307 1,391 3,940 10,345 10,899 9,437 6,345 2,322 676 1960 46,388 1,290 1,496 4,123 10,252 10,967 9,574 6,400 2,287 637 1961 46,653 1,210 1,583 4,255 10,176 11,012 9,667 6,833 2,220 725 1962 46,600 1,177 1,592 4,279 9,921 11,115 9,715 6,560 2,241 780 1963 47,129 1,321 1,586 4,514 9,875 11,187 9,836 6,674 2,135 738 1964 47,679 1,498 1,576 4,754 9,875 11,155 9,956 6,740 2,123 731 1965 48,255 1,531 1,866 4,894 9,902 11,121 10,045 6,763 2,131 759 1966 48,471 1,610 2,074 4,820 9,948 10,983 10,100 6,847 2,069 790 1967 48,987 1,658 1,976 5,043 10,207 10,860 10,189 6,938 2,118 838 1968 49,533 1,687 1,994 5,070 10,610 10,725 10,267 7,025 2,154 857 1969 50,221 1,770 2,101 5,282 10,940 10,556 10,343 7,053 2,170 874 1970 51,195 1,808 2,197 5,709 11,311 10,464 10,417 7,124 2,164 892 1971 52,021 1,850 2,311 6,194 11,653 10,322 10,457 7,146 2,089 927 1972 53,265 1,944 2,513 6,695 12,207 10,324 10,422 7,138 2,022 936 1973 54,203 2,058 2,60 7,080 12,848 10,270 10,431 7,003 1,908 964 1974 55,186 2,117 2.06 7,252 13,393 10,312 10,451 7.030 1,925 963 FEMALE 1947 16,664 643 1,192 2,716 3,740 3,676 2,731 1,522 445 232 1948 17,335 671 1,164 2,719 3,932 3,800 2,972 1,565 514 248 1949 17,788 648 1,163 2,659 3,997 3,989 3,099 1,678 556 242 1950 18,389 611 1,101 2,675 4,092 4,161 3,327 1,839 584 258 1951 19,016 662 1,095 2,659 4,292 4,301 3,534 1,923 551 255 1952 19,269 706 1,046 2,502 4,320 4,438 3,636 2,032 590 244 1953 19,382 656 1,050 2,428 4,162 4,662 3,680 2,048 693 239 1954 19,678 620 1,062 2,424 4,212 4,709 3,822 2,164 666 253 1955 20,548 641 1,083 2,445 4,251 4,805 4,154 2,391 780 258 1956 21,461 736 1,127 2,455 4,276 5,031 4,405 2,610 821 313 1957 21,732 716 1,144 2,442 4,255 5,116 4,615 2,631 813 332 1958 22,118 685 1,147 2,500 4,193 5,185 4,859 2,727 822 333 1959 22,483 765 1,131 2,473 4,689 5,227 5,081 2,883 836 349 1960 23,240 805 1,250 2,580 4,131 5,303 5,278 2,086 907 347 1961 23,806 774 1,368 2,697 4,143 5,389 5,403 3,105 926 419 1962 24,014 742 1,405 2,802 4,103 5,474 5,381 3,198 911 460 1963 24,704 850 1,381 2,959 4,174 5,600 5,503 3,332 905 405 1964 25,412 950 1,364 3,210 4,180 5,614 5,680 3,447 966 411 1965 26,200 954 1,559 3,364 4,329 5,720 5,712 3,587 976 421 1966 27,209 1,054 1,819 3,589 4,508 5,756 5,883 3,727 963 481 1967 28,360 1,076 1,811 3,967 4,843 5,844 5,984 3,855 978 539 1968 29,204 1,130 1,808 4,235 5,098 5,865 6,131 3,938 999 559 1969 30,512 1,240 1,860 4,597 5,395 5,901 6,356 4,077 1,056 573 1970 31.520 1,324 1,917 4,874 5,008 5,967 6,531 4.153 1,056 637 1971 32,091 1,331 1,961 5,071 5,933 5,954 6,569 4,215 1,057 637 1972 33,277 1,454 2,112 5,315 6,518 6,022 6,548 4,224 1,085 670 1973 34,510 1,578 2,219 5,592 7,186 6,146 6,556 4,179 1,054 702 1974 35,825 1,654 2,335 5,832 7,814 6,351 6,686 4,157 996 718 WHITE Male 1954 39,760 895 1,094 2,656 9,695 9,516 7,914 5,654 2,338 495 1955 40,196 934 1,121 2,802 9,720 9,598 8,027 5,653 2,342 457 1956 40,734 1,003 1,111 3,034 9,594 9,662 8,175 5,736 2,417 5w. 1957 40,821 992 1,115 3,153 9,453 9,719 8,317 5,735 2,308 607 1958 41,080 1,001 1,116 3,278 9,386 9,822 8,465 5,800 2,213 606 1959 41,397 1,077 1,202 3,408 9,261 9,876 8,581 5,833 2,158 506 1960 41,742 1,140 1,293 3,559 9,153 9,919 8,689 5,861 2,129 555 1961 41,986 1,067 1,372 3,681 9,072 9,961 8,776 5,988 2,008 649 1962 41,931 1,041 1.391 3,726 8,846 10,029 8,820 5,995 2,052 710 1963 42,404 1,183 1,380 3,955 8,805 10,079 8,944 6,090 1,967 661 1964 42,893 1,345 1,371 4,166 8,800 10,053 9,053 6,160 1,943 616 1965 43,400 1,359 1,639 4,279 8,823 10,023 9,129 6,188 1,95% 609 1966 43,572 1,423 1,831 4,200 8,859 9,892 9,159 6,250 1,95 706 1967 44,042 1,464 1,727 4,416 9,101 9,754 9,200 6,349 1,943 738 1968 44,554 1,504 1,732 4,432 9.477 9.651 9,340 6,427 1,950 761 1969 45,185 1,583 1,830 4,615 9,773 9,509 9,413 6,467 1,995 755 1970 46,013 1,628 1,922 4,983 10,088 9,413 9,458 6,515 1,977 800 1971 46,801 1,675 2,038 5,422 10,300 9,256 9,530 6,342 1,918 810 1972 47,930 1,749 2,220 5,890 10,940 9,261 9,479 6,548 1,841 517 1973 48,648 1,862 2,257 6,206 11,478 9,157 9,454 6,432 1,733 A-2 1974 45,486 2,3A7 G302 11,916 9.213 9,467 6,437 1,749 688 Footnote at end of table. 206 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-3. Civilian Labor Force for Persons 16 Years and Over, by Sex, Color, and Age: Annual Averages, 1947-1974 ¹-Continued Total, 16 16 and 17 18 and 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 35 to 64 65 years 14 and Item years and years years years years years years years and over 15 years over WHITE-Continued Female 1954 17,057 552 960 2,098 532 4,025 3,346 1,937 607 205 1955 17,886 576 966 2,137 3,346 4,131 3,654 2,156 720 224 1956 18,693 654 1,003 2,158 3,559 4,340 3,886 2,344 748 269 1957 18,920 645 1,022 2,131 3,561 4,397 4,065 2,357 743 292 1958 19,213 614 1,028 2,172 3,498 4,435 4,262 2,454 751 295 1959 19,556 698 1,023 2,135 3,409 4,479 4,467 2,577 767 307 1960 20,171 731 1,112 2,228 3,441 4,531 4,633 2,661 835 300 1961 20,668 700 1,222 2,345 3,431 4,596 4,741 2,785 849 376 1962 20,819 668 1,254 2,438 3,372 4,666 4,731 2,861 830 418 1963 21,426 767 1,228 2,582 3,424 4,780 4,845 2,977 823 365 1964 22,028 867 1,201 2,786 3,435 4,797 4,989 3,077 874 374 1965 22,736 862 1,405 2,910 3,568 4,876 5,032 3,203 879 382 1966 23,702 944 1,630 3,123 3,732 4,894 5,181 3,333 865 444 1967 24,657 967 1,591 3,470 4,021 4,980 5,285 3,468 877 485 1968 25,424 1,015 1,588 3,677 4,263 5,021 5,416 3,541 903 520 1969 26,594 1,115 1,640 3,999 4,516 5,053 5,645 3,665 958 534 1970 27,505 1,194 1,695 4,246 4,790 5,112 5,781 3,734 952 582 1971 27,989 1,210 1,749 4,422 4,968 5,083 5,814 3,787 956 590 1972 29,028 1,330 1,876 4,633 5,454 5,126 5,807 3,813 959 614 1973 30,041 1,432 1,962 4,858 6,055 5,236 5,806 3,750 941 657 1974 31,192 1,504 2,071 5,064 6,612 5,409 5,914 3,728 890 660 NEGRO AND OTHER RACES Male 1954 4,203 127 178 396 1,074 997 790 451 187 79 1955 4,279 135 178 419 1,085 908 813 468 183 79 1956 4,359 140 181 450 1,090 1,002 827 484 185 77 1957 4,376 135 175 473 1,088 1,012 836 487 170 78 1958 4,442 133 180 493 1,069 1,021 855 505 166 69 1959 4,490 130 188 532 1,065 1,023 849 512 163 79 1960 4,645 150 203 564 1,099 1,049 884 838 158 83 1961 4,666 142 210 575 1,103 1,050 891 542 151 77 1962 4,668 136 201 553 1,074 1,087 895 564 159 71 1963 4,725 138 206 558 1,070 1,109 891 584 168 77 1964 4,785 154 205 588 1,074 1,101 903 580 181 86 1965 4,855 172 226 614 1,079 1,098 916 575 173 90 1966 4,899 187 244 620 1,089 1,090 912 597 162 84 1967 4,945 194 249 628 1,106 1,076 929 590 175 91 1968 4,979 183 262 639 1,133 1,064 927 598 174 96 1969 5,036 187 271 667 1,167 1,048 931 592 175 86 1970 5,182 180 275 725 1,223 1,052 929 609 188 93 1971 5,220 175 272 U2 1,263 1,037 927 604 170 87 1972 5,335 195 293 804 1,267 1,063 943 590 181 88 1973 5,555 196 310 874 1,370 1,083 977 571 175 82 1974 5,700 213 319 871 1,447 1,099 984 592 176 95 Female 1954 2,621 68 101 326 680 684 476 226 59 47 1955 2,663 65 117 307 706 673 499 235 60 34 1956 2,768 82 124 297 717 692 519 266 72 44 1957 2,812 71 122 311 694 719 550 274 70 40 1958 2,905 71 120 328 695 750 597 274 72 38 1959 2,928 66 107 338 680 748 614 304 69 42 1960 3,069 74 139 352 690 771 645 324 73 47 1961 3,136 74 146 353 712 793 662 320 77 44 1962 3,195 73 151 364 730 809 650 336 82 42 1963 3,279 82 153 377 749 821 656 354 84 39 1964 3,384 83 164 424 744 818 690 370 92 37 1965 3,464 92 134 434 761 844 680 383 96 39 1966 3,597 110 188 466 777 863 702 394 99 37 1967 3,704 110 219 497 827 864 699 387 102 48 1968 3,780 115 220 558 835 845 715 397 96 38 1969 3,918 125 219 598 878 846 741 412 99 39 1970 4,015 129 222 628 907 855 750 419 104 55 1971 4,102 122 212 649 965 871 755 429 101 48 1972 4,249 125 236 682 1,034 895 740 411 126 56 1973 4,470 146 257 734 1,131 910 750 428 113 45 1974 4,633 150 264 768 1,202 942 772 430 106 58 1 Absolute numbers by color are not available prior to 1934 because popu- lation controls by color were not introduced into the Current Population Survey until that year. FORD 0788 LIBRARY 207 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-27. Unemployed Jobseekers by Job Search Method Used, by Sex and Age: Annual Averages, 1970-74 Percent using method Total Average Year, sex, and age jobseekers number of (thousands) Public Private Employer Friends Placed or methods employment employment directly or answered Other used agency agency relatives ads 1970 Total 3,277 30.2 10. 1 71.0 14.3 23 4 7.4 1.56 16 to 19 years 018 21.9 6.6 76. 9 13. 8 20. 1 4.9 1.44 20 to 24 years 722 36. 6 11. 5 72 3 14.0 24.9 4.3 1.64 25 to 34 years 529 34. 6 12. 7 68. 8 14. 6 25. 5 7.8 1.64 35 to 44 years 365 33. 2 11. 2 68. 8 14. 5 24.9 9.6 1.62 45 to 54 years 343 33. 2 12.2 67. 6 14.6 25. 7 10.8 1.64 55 years and over 300 28 3 10 0 58. 3 15.0 23.0 16.7 1.52 Male 746 32 9 10. 4 T22 16. 3 21.9 9.8 1.63 16 to 19 years 547 21.9 5.5 79.5 13: 18. 5 4.6 1.45 20 to 24 years 382 39. 5 11. 5 73. 6 16. 5 23. 3 5.5 1.70 25 to 34 years 272 42. 3 15. 1 69. 5 18. 4 25. 4 11.0 1.81 as to 44 years 172 38. 4 13. 4 70. 3 18. 0 24. 4 15.1 1.80 45 to 54 years 174 36. 2 13. 2 68 4 17. 8 25. 3 16. 1.77 55 years and over 199 30.2 9.5 58. 8 13.1 19.1 20.6 1.52 Female 1,531 27. 2 9.8 69. 7 12 0 25. 1 4.8 1.49 16 to 19 years 471 22. 1 7.9 74. 1 12. 1 22.1 5.3 1.44 20 to 24 years 339 33. 3 11.5 71. 1 11.2 26. 8 29 1.57 25 to 34 years 257 26. 8 10. 1 68. 1 10. 9 25.7 43 1.46 35 to 44 years 193 28. 5 9.8 67.4 11. 4 25.4 4.7 1.47 45 to 54 years 109 30.2 10. 7 66. 9 11. 2 26. 0 5.3 1.51 55 years and over 101 24. 8 10. 8 56. 4 18. 8 30. , 9.9 1.50 1971 Total 4. 117 30.8 9.7 71.6 15. 2 25. 7 6.7 1.60 20. 8 16 to 19 years 1,171 20. 6 5.6 78. 1 13.8 4.4 1.43 20 to 24 years 958 36 0 11. 7 72 0 14. 8 30. 0 4.5 1.69 25 to 34 years 730 36. 7 11.5 71. 1 15. 8 27. 8 6.7 1.70 35 to 44 years 466 33. 7 11.2 67. 6 15. 5 27. 0 8.6 1.64 45 to 54 years 425 34. 6 11.5 66. 8 16. 5 26. 1 10. 8 1.66 55 years and over 368 30. 4 10. 61. 17.9 24.7 14.9 1.59 Male 2,235 34. 4 10. 2 72 1 17.4 24.3 9.1 1.68 16 to 19 years 639 21. 4 4.4 80.0 16. 1 18. 5 4.2 1.44 20 to 24 years 534 40 4 9.2 73.0 16.9 28. 7 5.4 1.75 25 to 34 years 374 43.0 13.6 71.1 18. 4 27.5 9.1 1.83 35 to 44 years 225 40.9 15. 1 67.1 18. 7 26.7 14.2 1.83 45 to 54 years 227 39.2 14. 1 66. 1 17.6 25. 1 16.1 7 1.78 55 years and over 236 30.9 10. 2 61.0 19.1 22.0 18. 6 1.63 Female 1,882 22.6 9.1 70.9 12.5 27.5 4.3 1.51 16 to 19 years 532 19.5 7.0 75. 8 11.1 23.3 4.5 1.41 20 to 24 years 424 30. 4 12.7 70.8 12.3 31. 6 3.5 1.61 25 to 34 years 355 30.1 9.3 71.3 12. 7 28.2 4.2 1.56 3.8 35 to 44 years 240 27.1 7.9 68. 3 12 5 27.1 1.47 45 to 54 years 198 29. 3 8.6 67.1 2 15.6 27.3 4.0 1.52 55 years and over 132 28 8 9.1 621 15.9 29.5 6.8 1.52 1972 Total 4,130 28 4 8.8 71.8 13.8 26.0 6.3 1.55 3.7 16 to 19 years 1,214 18 5 5.3 7a. 3 13. 3 20.8 1.40 20 to 24 years 986 32 6 10.0 71.9 12. 4 28.8 4.6 1.60 25 to 34 years 699 33. 9 10.9 70. 7 15.5 27.6 6.2 1.65 35 to 44 years 455 35. 2 12.1 67. 7 13.6 29.5 7.0 1.65 45 to 54 years 393 21. 8 10.7 66. 9 13. 5 28. 8 10.7 1.62 55 years and over 382 27. 7 7.1 62.6 16. 8 25.4 13.6 1.53 Male 2,201 31.2 9.0 726 15. 7 24.1 8.1 1.61 16 to 19 years 654 18.5 5.0 80. 1 15.7 18.7 3.1 1.41 20 to 24 years 538 35. 9 10.2 73. 4 13. 9 27.7 5.4 1.67 25 to 34 years 350 40.3 11.7 71. 7 18.6 27.1 8.3 1.78 35 to 44 years 215 41. 4 14.9 67. 4 15.8 27.0 11.2 1.78 45 to 54 yours 203 34.5 11.3 64. 5 13.8 26. 17.7 1.68 239 30.1 6.3 61. 1 16.7 22.2 17.6 1.54 55 years and over Female 1,929 25.1 8.7 70.9 11.6 28.1 4.1 1.49 16 to 19 years 560 18. 2 6.3 75. 7 10. 5 23. 4 4.5 1.39 20 to 24 years 448 2% 6 9.8 69.9 10.3 30.1 3.6 1.52 25 to 34 years 348 27.3 10. 1 69.8 12.1 28.2 3.6 1.52 1.53 35 to 44 years 240 29. 6 9.6 67.9 11.7 31.3 3.3 45 to 54 years 190 28.4 10. 0 69.5 13.2 31.6 32 1.56 55 years and over 143 23.8 8.4 65. 0 16. 8 30. 1 7.7 1.52 Note at end of table. FORD 240 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-27. Unemployed Jobseekers by Job Search Method Used, by Sex and Age: Annual Averages, 1970-74--Continued Percent using method Total Average Year, sex, and age Jobseekers number of (thousands) Public Private Employer Friends Placed or methods employment employment directly or answered Other used agency agency relatives ads 1973 Total 710 25. 9 7.5 71. 6 14. 1 26. 1 6.6 1.52 16 to 19 years 1,150 17. 1 4.5 7v. 0 14.0 22.2 18 1.41 20 to 24 years 876 30. 0 8.0 72 3 14. 2 28 9 4.3 1.58 25 to 34 years 689 32. 1 11.2 69. 7 13. 5 28 0 6.7 1.61 35 to 44 years 364 31. 6 8.5 66. 5 12. 6 28. 3 8.2 1.56 45 to 54 years 335 29. 0 90 65. 4 14.9 27.1 2 11. 3 1.56 55 years and over 296 23. 6 7.1 59. 1 15. 9 25. 3 16. 2 1.48 Male 1,886 28. 5 7.4 72 7 15. 7 24. 6 8.7 1.58 16 to 19 years 602 16. 6 4.0 81. 6 15. 3 21. 1 3.8 1.43 20 to 24 years 446 34. 5 7.6 73. 5 16. 8 26. 7 4.9 1.64 25 to 34 years 327 37. 3 11.9 70. 9 16. 2 28. 4 8.9 1.74 35 to 44 years 165 38. 8 9.7 65. 5 14. 5 26. 7 12.7 1.67 45 to 54 years 167 32 9 8.4 63. 5 16. 2 24. 0 18. 6 1.63 55 years and over 179 23. 5 7.3 59. 8 15. 1 22. 3 21.8 1.49 Female 1,824 23. 3 7.7 70. 5 123 27. 7 4.3 1.46 16 to 19 years 548 17. 7 4.9 75.9 12.6 23.2 3.8 1.38 20 to 24 years 430 25. 3 8.4 70.7 11.4 31.2 2 3.7 1.51 25 to 34 years 362 27.3 10. 2 68. 5 11. 0 27. 6 4.4 1.49 35 to 44 years 200 25. 5 R.O 67. 5 11. 0 29. 5 4.5 1.46 45 to 54 years 168 25. 0 8.9 67. 3 14.3 30. 4 3.6 1.49 55 years and over 117 23. 9 6.8 59.8 17.9 29.9 8.5 1.45 1974 Total 4,201 26. 3 7.8 71.8 14.4 27.0 6.7 1.54 16 to 19 years 1,306 19.0 4.7 79.0 13. 2 23.0 4.3 1.43 20 to 24 years 993 30. 4 9.0 72 0 14.5 28. 8 5.3 1.60 25 to 34 years 784 31. 0 10.6 69. 4 14.5 29. 3 7.0 1.62 35 to 44 years 426 28. 9 9.2 67.6 14.3 27.9 8.7 1.56 45 to 54 years 369 28. 2 9.2 66. 4 15.2 28. 2 11. 1 1.58 55 years and over 323 26. 0 7.1 60. 1 17.6 29.1 127 1.53 Male 2,148 29. 4 7.9 72.2 16. 9 24.8 9.3 1.60 16 to 19 years 687 19. 7 3.9 80. 3 14. 3 20. 7 4.7 1.44 20 to 24 years 514 34. 4 8.6 71. 6 18. 1 27. 8 7.2 1.68 25 to 34 years 385 38. 2 11. 9 69.9 19. 0 29.1 10. 4 1.78 35 to 44 years 189 3d. 5 11. 1 66. 7 18. 5 23.8 13. 8 1.71 45 to 54 years 179 30. 2 10.1 66. 5 17. 3 23. 5 17.3 1.65 55 years and over 195 25. 6 6.7 60. 0 16. 9 24.6 17.4 1.51 Female 2,052 23. 1 7.8 71. 5 11. 7 29. 3 3.9 1.47 16 to 19 years 619 18. 3 5.7 77.5 12. 0 25. 5 3.9 1.43 20 to 24 years 478 26. 2 9.4 72 6 10. 7 29.9 3.3 1.52 25 to 34 years 399 24. 1 9.3 68. 9 10. 3 29. 6 18 1.46 35 to 44 years 237 22 8 7.2 68. 8 10. 5 31. 2 4.2 1.45 45 to 54 years 190 26. 3 8.4 66. 3 13. 2 32. 6 4.7 1.52 55 years and over 129 26. 4 7.8 60. 5 18. 6 36.4 6.2 1.53 NOTE: See note, table A-26. FORD 1975 Manpower Report of the President 241 Table A-20. Unemployment Rates of Persons 16 Years and Over, by Color, Sex, and Age: Annual Averages, 1948-74 Total, 16 16 and 17 18 and 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 14 and Item years and years years years years years years years and over 15 years over WHITE Male 1948 8.4 10.2 9.4 6.4 26 21 24 3.0 3.3 5.9 1949 5.6 13. 4 14.2 9.8 4.9 3.9 4.0 5.3 5.0 5.1 1950 4.7 13.4 11.7 7.7 3.9 1.2 3.7 4.7 4.6 5.8 1951 26 9.5 6.7 1.6 20 1.8 22 27 3.4 4.7 1952 25 10.9 7.0 4.3 1.9 1.7 20 23 29 5.5 1953 25 8.9 7.1 4.5 20 1.8 20 2.7 23 4.6 1954 4.8 14.0 13.0 9.8 4.2 1.6 3.8 4.3 4.2 4.9 1955 3.7 12.2 10.4 7.0 27 26 29 3.9 3.8 5.1 1956 3.4 11.2 9.7 6.1 28 22 28 3.1 3.4 6.1 1957 3.6 11.9 11.2 7.1 27 25 3.0 3.4 3.2 6.8 1958 6.1 14.9 16.5 11.7 5.6 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.0 7.9 1959 4.6 15.0 13.0 7.5 3.8 3.2 3.7 4.2 4.5 7.2 1960 4.8 14.6 13.5 8.3 4.1 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.0 8.1 1961 5.7 16.5 15.1 10.0 4.9 4.0 4.4 5.3 5.2 8.0 1962 4.6 15.1 127 8.0 3.8 3.1 3.5 4.1 4.1 7.6 1963 4.7 17.8 14.2 7.8 3.9 29 3.3 4.0 4.1 7.9 1964 4.1 16.1 13.4 7.4 3.0 25 29 3.5 3.6 7.7 1965 3.6 14.7 11.4 5.9 26 23 2.3 3.1 3.4 7.1 1966 28 12.5 8.9 4.1 21 1.7 1.7 2.5 3.0 7.6 1967 27 12.7 9.0 4.2 1.9 1.6 1.8 22 27 8.9 1968 26 12.3 8.2 4.6 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.7 28 8.3 1969 25 125 7.9 4.6 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.7 21 8.5 1970 4.0 15.7 120 7.8 3.1 23 23 2.7 3.2 10.1 1971 4.9 17.1 13.5 9.4 4.0 2.9 2.8 3.2 3.4 10.8 1972 4.5 16.4 124 8.5 3.4 25 25 3.0 3.3 10.7 1973 3.7 15. 1 10.0 6.5 3.0 1.8 2.0 24 29 10.7 1974 4.3 16.2 11.5 7.8 3.5 24 22 25 3.0 11.9 Female 1948 3.8 9.7 6.8 4.2 3.8 29 3.1 3.2 24 7.6 1949 5.7 13.6 10.7 6.7 5.5 4.5 4.0 4.3 4.1 7.5 1950 5.3 13.8 9.4 6.1 5.2 4.0 4.3 4.3 3.1 8.0 1951 4.2 9.6 6.5 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.6 4.0 3.3 7.1 1952 3.3 9.3 6.2 3.8 3.2 2.8 2.4 25 23 7.6 1953 3.1 8.3 6.0 4.1 3.1 23 23 2.5 1.4 4.0 1954 5.6 12.0 9.4 6.4 5.7 4.9 4.4 4.5 28 6.8 1955 4.3 11.6 7.7 5.1 4.3 3.8 3.4 3.6 22 7.1 1956 4.2 121 8.3 5.1 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.5 23 7.8 1957 4.3 11.9 7.9 5.1 4.7 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.5 6.8 1958 6.2 15.6 11.0 7.4 6.6 5.6 4.9 4.3 3.5 5.8 1959 5.3 13.3 11.1 6.7 5.0 4.7 4.0 4.0 3.4 5.2 1960 5.3 14.5 11.5 7.2 5.7 4.2 4.0 3.3 28 6.3 1961 6.5 17.0 13.6 8.4 6.6 5.6 4.8 4.3 3.7 6.6 1962 5.5 15.6 11.3 7.7 5.4 4.5 3.7 3.4 4.0 5.6 1963 5.8 18.1 13.2 7.4 5.8 4.6 3.9 3.5 3.0 5.9 1964 5.5 17.1 13.2 7.1 5.2 4.5 3.6 3.5 3.4 4.1 1965 5.0 15.0 13.4 6.3 4.8 4.1 3.0 27 27 4.4 1966 4.3 14.5 10.7 5.3 3.7 3.3 27 22 27 4.4 1967 4.6 129 10.6 6.0 4.7 3.7 2.9 23 26 5.2 1968 4.3 13.9 11.0 5.9 3.9 3.1 2.3 21 27 5.4 1969 4.2 13.8 10.0 5.5 4.2 3.2 24 2.1 24 6.4 1970 5.4 15.3 11.9 6.9 5.3 4.3 3.4 2.6 3.3 7.4 1971 6.3 16.7 14.1 8.5 6.3 4.9 3.9 3.3 3.6 8.3 1972 5.9 17.0 123 8.2 5.5 4.5 3.5 3.3 3.7 &1 1973 5.3 15.7 10.9 7.0 5.1 3.7 3.1 28 28 7.8 974 6.1 16.4 13.0 8.2 5.7 4.3 3.6 3.3 3.9 9.9 1 Footnote at end of table. GENNLE FORD 233 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-20. Unemployment Rates of Persons 16 Years and Over, by Color, Sex, and Age: Annual Averages, 1948-74-Continued Total, 16 16 and 17 18 and 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 14 and Item years and years years years years years years years and over 15 years over NEGRO AND OTHER RACES Male 1948 5.8 9.4 10.5 11.7 4.7 5.2 3.7 3.5 4.6 3.2 1949 9.6 15.8 17.1 15.8 8.5 8.1 7.9 7.0 6.2 6.1 1950 9.4 121 17.7 126 10.0 7.9 7.4 8.0 7.0 10.8 1951 4.9 8.7 9.6 6.7 5.5 3.4 3.6 4.1 4.7 4.9 1952 5.2 8.0 10.0 7.9 5.5 4.4 4.2 3.7 4.7 5.5 1953 4.8 8.3 8.1 8.1 4.3 3.6 5.1 3.6 3.1 5.1 1954 10.3 13.4 14.7 16.9 10.1 9.0 9.3 7.5 7.5 5.1 1955 8.8 14.8 12.9 12.4 8.6 8.2 6.4 9.0 7.1 12.7 1956 7.9 15.7 14.9 12.0 7.6 6.6 5.4 8.1 4.9 13.0 1957 8.3 16.3 20.0 12.7 8.5 6.4 6.2 5.5 5.9 14.1 1958 13.8 27.1 26.7 19.5 14.7 11.4 10.3 10.1 9.0 13.0 1959 11.5 22.3 27.2 16.3 12.3 8.9 7.9 8.7 8.4 12.7 1960 10.7 22.7 25.1 13.1 10.7 8.2 8.5 9.5 6.3 13.3 1961 12.8 31.0 23.9 15.3 12.9 10.7 10.2 10.5 9.4 14.3 1962 10.9 21.9 21.8 14.6 10.5 8.6 8.3 9.6 11.9 15.2 1963 10.5 27.0 27.4 15.5 9.5 8.0 7.1 7.4 10.1 16.9 1964 8.9 25.9 23.1 12.6 7.7 6.2 5.9 8.1 8.3 19.1 1965 7.4 27.1 20.2 9.3 6.2 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.2 20.3 1966 6.3 22.5 20.5 7.9 4.9 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.9 20.0 1967 6.0 28.9 20.1 8.0 4.4 3.1 3.4 4.1 5.1 24.1 1968 5.6 26.6 19.0 8.3 3.8 29 2.5 3.6 4.0 26.0 1969 5.3 24.7 19.0 8.4 3.4 2.4 24 3.2 3.2 22.1 1970 7.3 27.8 23.1 12.6 6.1 3.9 3.3 3.4 3.8 29.0 1971 9.1 33.4 26.0 16.2 7.4 4.9 4.5 4.7 3.4 32.2 1972 8.9 35.1 26.2 14.7 6.8 4.8 3.8 4.6 6.9 31.8 1973 7.6 31.4 221 12.6 5.8 4.0 3.2 3.1 3.6 34.1 1974 9.1 39.0 26.6 15.4 7.2 4.1 4.0 3.6 5.6 37.9 Female 1948 6.1 11.8 14.6 10.2 7.3 4.0 29 3.0 1.6 (1) 1949 7.9 20.3 15.9 12.5 8.5 6.2 4.0 5.6 1.6 (1) 1950 8.4 17.6 14.1 13.0 9.1 6.6 5.9 4.8 5.7 (1) 1951 6.1 13.0 15.1 8.8 7.1 5.6 2.8 3.4 1.6 (1) 1952 5.7 6.3 16.8 10.7 6.2 4.0 3.5 2.4 1.5 (1) 1953 4.1 10.3 9.9 5.5 4.9 3.5 2.1 2.1 1.6 (') 1954 9.3 10.1 21.6 13.2 10.9 7.3 5.9 4.9 5.1 (1) 1955 8.4 15.4 21.4 13.0 10.2 5.5 5.2 5.5 3.3 (1) 1956 8.9 22.0 23.4 14.8 9.1 6.8 5.6 5.3 28 (1) 1957 7.3 18.3 21.3 12.2 8.1 4.7 4.2 4.0 4.3 (1) 1958 10.8 25.4 30.0 18.0 11.1 9.2 4.9 6.2 5.6 (1) 1959 9.4 25.8 29.9 14.9 9.7 7.6 6.1 5.0 2.3 (1) 1960 9.4 25.7 24.5 15.3 9.1 8.6 5.7 4.3 4.1 (1) 1961 11.8 31.1 28.2 19.5 11.1 10.7 7.4 6.3 6.5 (1) 1962 11.0 27.8 31.2 18.2 11.5 8.9 7.1 3.6 3.7 (1) 1963 11.2 40.1 31.9 18.7 11.7 8.2 6.1 4.8 3.6 (1) 1964 10.6 36.5 29.2 18.3 11.2 7.8 6.1 3.8 2.2 (1) 1965 9.2 37.8 27.8 13.7 8.4 7.6 4.4 3.9 3.1 (1) 1966 8.6 34.8 29.2 12.6 8.1 5.0 5.0 3.3 4.0 (1) 1967 9.1 32.0 28.3 13.8 8.7 6.2 4.4 3.4 3.4 27.1 1968 8.3 33.7 26.2 12.3 8.4 5.0 3.2 2.8 2.4 28.9 1969 7.8 31.2 25.7 12.0 6.6 4.5 3.7 29 1.1 23.1 1970 9.3 36.9 329 15.0 7.9 4.8 4.0 3.2 1.9 30.9 1971 10.8 38.5 33.7 17.3 10.7 6.9 4.2 3.5 3.9 33.3 1972 11.3 38.3 38.7 17.4 10.2 7.2 4.7 4.0 20 39.3 1973 10.5 36.5 33.3 17.6 9.7 5.3 3.7 3.2 3.9 35.6 1974 10.7 36.2 33.7 18.0 8.6 6.7 4.3 3.3 1.5 37.9 1 Rate not shown where base is less than 50,000. GREATE FORD GRAND 234 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-19. Unemployed Persons 16 Years and Over and Unemployment Rates, by Sex and Age: Annual Averages, 1947-74 Total, 16 16 and 17 Sex and year 18 and 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 14 and years and years years years years years years years and over 15 years over Number unemployed (thousands) MALE 1947 1,692 114 156 392 349 250 203 162 67 28 1948 1,559 112 143 324 289 233 201 178 81 31 1949 2,572 145 207 485 539 414 347 310 125 30 1950 2,239 139 179 377 467 348 327 286 117 41 1951 1,221 102 89 155 241 192 193 162 87 29 1952 1,185 116 89 155 233 192 182 145 73 32 1953 1,202 94 90 152 236 208 196 167 60 26 1954 2,344 142 168 327 517 431 372 275 112 28 1955 1,854 134 140 248 353 328 285 265 102 35 1956 1,711 134 135 240 348 278 270 216 90 46 1957 1,841 140 159 283 349 304 302 220 83 52 1958 3,098 185 231 478 683 552 492 349 124 57 1959 2,420 191 207 343 453 407 390 287 112 53 1960 2,486 200 225 369 492 415 392 294 96 55 1961 2,997 221 258 457 585 507 473 374 122 63 1962 2,423 187 220 381 446 405 381 300 103 65 1963 2,472 248 232 396 444 386 358 289 97 65 1964 2,205 257 230 384 345 323 319 262 85 66 1965 1,914 247 232 311 293 284 253 221 75 66 1966 1,551 220 212 221 238 219 197 180 65 71 1967 1,508 241 207 235 219 185 199 164 60 87 1968 1,419 234 193 258 205 171 165 132 61 88 1969 1,403 244 197 270 205 155 157 127 48 86 1970 2,235 305 24 478 300 253 247 197 71 109 1971 2,776 315 316 635 505 319 313 230 71 119 1972 2,635 355 352 619 458 282 273 236 73 119 1973 2,240 349 205 514 424 209 219 170 57 122 1974 2,668 391 359 631 528 263 252 182 63 142 FEMALE 1947 619 63 81 124 134 99 72 39 10 18 1948 717 66 86 132 169 113 90 49 12 18 1949 1,065 93 130 195 237 159 124 74 21 18 1950 1,049 87 108 184 235 182 151 82 20 24 1951 834 66 79 118 194 162 125 76 16 17 1952 698 64 76 113 156 133 92 50 13 17 1953 632 56 67 104 143 117 84 51 10 10 1954 1,188 79 112 177 276 249 176 99 20 19 1955 998 77 99 148 224 193 151 90 18 18 1956 1,039 97 112 155 206 198 159 95 19 28 1957 1,018 90 107 147 224 195 146 80 28 25 1958 1,504 114 148 223 308 319 239 122 31 22 1959 1,320 110 146 200 242 266 214 119 23 20 1960 1,366 124 162 214 260 256 222 101 25 24 1961 1,717 142 207 265 304 342 278 141 36 30 1962 1,488 124 189 255 267 283 223 111 37 31 1963 1,598 172 211 262 286 287 231 120 29 31 1964 1,581 179 207 276 262 281 223 122 33 24 1965 1,452 164 231 246 236 263 183 101 27 24 1966 1,324 175 229 224 201 207 173 86 27 30 1967 1,468 160 231 277 261 237 185 93 26 38 1968 1,397 179 233 285 238 199 149 87 27 39 1969 1,428 192 220 290 247 203 163 89 24 43 1970 1,853 231 275 386 325 262 229 111 33 59 1971 2,217 249 318 486 416 310 260 141 34 65 1972 2,205 274 321 497 405 293 237 140 38 72 1973 2,064 279 300 471 416 240 211 117 31 67 1974 2,408 301 359 552 483 294 247 135 36 86 BERALD R. FORD 231 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-19. Unemployed Persons 16 Years and Over and Unemployment Rates, by Sex and Age: Annual Averages, 1947-74-Continued Total. 16 16 and 17 18 and 19 20 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 years 14 and Sex and year years and years years years years years years years and over 15 years over Unemployment rate MALE 1947 4.0 10.3 11.3 8.5 3.4 26 26 29 28 4.8 1948 3.6 10.1 9.6 6.9 2.8 24 2.5 1.1 3.4 5.4 1949 5.9 13.7 14.6 10.4 5.2 4.3 4.3 5.4 5.1 5.2 1950 5.1 13.3 12.3 8.1 4.4 3.6 4.0 4.9 4.8 6.6 1951 28 9.4 7.0 3.9 23 2.0 2.4 28 3.5 4.7 1952 2.8 10.5 7.4 4.6 22 1.9 2.2 24 3.0 5.5 1953 2.8 8.8 7.2 5.0 22 20 23 2.8 2.4 4.6 1954 5.3 13.9 13.2 10.7 4.8 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.9 1955 4.2 12.5 10.8 7.7 3.3 3.1 3.2 4.3 4.0 6.2 1956 3.8 11.7 10.4 6.9 3.3 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.5 6.9 1957 4.1 12.4 12.3 7.8 3.3 28 3.3 3.5 3.4 7.6 1958 6.8 16.3 17.8 12.7 6.5 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.2 8.4 1959 5.3 15.8 14.9 8.7 4.7 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.8 7.8 1960 5.4 15.5 15.0 8.9 4.8 3.8 4.1 4.6 4.2 8.6 1961 6.4 18.3 16.3 10.7 5.7 4.6 4.9 5.7 5.5 8.7 1962 5.2 15.9 13.8 8.9 4.5 3.6 3.9 4.6 4.6 8.3 1963 5.2 18.8 15.9 8.8 4.5 3.5 3.6 4.3 4.5 8.8 1964 4.6 17.1 14.6 8.1 3.5 2.9 3.2 3.9 4.0 9.0 1965 4.0 16.1 12.4 6.3 3.0 2.6 25 3.3 3.5 8.6 1966 3.2 13.7 10.2 4.6 2.4 2.0 2.0 26 3.1 8.9 1967 3.1 14.5 10.5 4.7 2.1 1.7 1.9 24 28 10.5 1968 29 13.9 9.7 5.1 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.9 10.3 1969 28 13.8 9.4 5.1 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.8 22 9.8 1970 4.4 16.9 13.4 8.4 3.4 24 2.4 28 3.3 122 1971 5.3 18.6 15.0 19.3 14 3.1 3.0 3.3 3.4 12.8 1972 4.9 18 2 14.0 9.2 3.7 27 26 3.2 3.6 12.7 1973 4.1 17.0 11.4 7.3 3.3 20 2.1 2.4 3.0 12.7 1974 4.8 18.5 13.3 8.7 3.9 26 24 26 3.3 14.5 FEMALE 1947 3.7 9.8 6.8 4.6 3.6 2.7 26 2.6 2.2 7.8 1948 4.1 9.8 7.4 4.9 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.1 23 7.3 1949 6.0 14.4 11.2 7.3 5.9 4.7 4.0 4.4 3.8 7.4 1950 5.7 14.2 9.8 6.9 5.7 4.4 4.5 4.5 3.4 9.0 1951 4.4 10.0 7.2 4.4 4.5 3.8 3.5 4.0 2.9 6.6 1952 3.6 9.1 7.3 4.5 3.6 3.0 2.5 25 22 7.0 1953 3.3 8.5 6.4 4.3 3.4 25 23 25 1.4 42 1954 6.0 12.7 10.5 7.3 6.6 5.3 4.6 4.6 3.0 7.5 1955 4.9 12.0 9.1 6.1 5.3 4.0 3.6 3.8 23 7.0 1956 4.8 13.2 9.9 6.3 4.8 3.9 3.6 3.6 23 8.9 1957 4.7 12.6 9.4 6.0 5.3 3.8 3.2 3.0 3.4 7.5 1958 6.8 16.6 12.9 8.9 7.3 6.2 4.9 4.5 3.8 6.6 1959 5.9 14.4 12.9 8.1 5.9 5.1 4.2 4.1 2.8 5.7 1960 5.9 15.4 13.0 8.3 6.3 4.8 4.2 3.4 2.8 7.9 1961 7.2 18.3 15.1 9.8 7.3 6.3 5.1 4.5 3.9 6.2 1962 6.2 16.8 13.5 9.1 6.5 5.2 4.1 3.5 4.1 6.7 1963 6.5 20.3 15.2 R.9 6.9 5.1 4.2 3.6 3.2 7.6 1964 6.2 18.8 15.1 8.6 6.3 5.0 3.9 3.5 3.4 5.9 1965 5.5 17.2 14.8 7.3 5.5 4.6 3.2 28 2.8 5.7 1966 4.8 16.6 12.6 6.3 4.5 3.6 29 23 2.8 6.3 1967 5.2 14.8 12.7 7.0 5.4 4.0 3.1 24 27 7.2 1968 4.8 15.9 12.9 6.7 4.7 3.4 2.4 22 27 7.0 1969 4.7 15.5 11.8 6.3 4.6 3.4 26 22 23 7.5 1970 5.9 17.4 14.4 7.9 5.7 4.4 3.5 2.7 3.1 9.3 1971 6.9 18.7 16.2 9.6 7.0 5.2 4.0 3.3 36 10.2 1972 6.6 18.8 16.2 9.3 6.2 4.9 3.6 3.3 3.5 10.8 1973 6.0 17.7 13.5 8.4 5.8 3.9 3.2 2.8 29 9.5 1974 6.7 18.2 15.4 9.5 6.2 4.6 3.7 3.3 3.7 12.0 FORD 232 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-6. Employment Status of Young Workers 16 to 24 Years Old: Annual Averages, 1947-74 16 to 19 years Employment status and year Total, 16 years Total, 16 to 20 to 24 and over 24 years Total 16 and 17 18 and 19 years CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE (thousands) 1947 59,350 11,668 4,323 1,750 2, 573 7,345 1948 60,621 11,828 4,435 1,780 2,655 7,393 1949 61,286 11,629 4,289 1,704 2,585 7,340 1950 62,208 11,523 4,216 1,659 2,557 7,307 1951 62,017 10,699 105 1,743 2,362 6,594 4,063 1,807 2,256 5,840 1952 62,138 9,903 1953 63,015 9,509 4,026 1,726 2,300 5,483 1954 63,643 9,452 3,976 1,643 2,333 5,476 1955 65,023 9,759 4,093 1,711 2,382 5,666 66,552 10,236 4,296 1,877 2,419 5,940 1956 1957 66,929 10,344 4,276 1,843 2,433 6,068 1958 67,639 10,531 4,260 1,818 2,442 6,271 1959 68,369 10,905 4,492 1,971 2,521 6,413 1960 69,628 11,543 4,840 2,093 2,747 6,703 70,459 11,888 4,935 1,984 2,951 6,953 1961 1962 70,614 11,997 4,915 1,918 2,997 7,082 71,833 12,611 5,138 2,171 2,967 7.473 1963 73,091 13,353 5,390 2,449 2,941 7,963 1964 1965 74,455 14,168 5,910 2,485 3,425 8,258 1966 75,770 14,966 6,557 2,664 3,893 8,409 2 734 3,786 9,010 1967 77,347 15,529 6,519 1968 78,737 15,923 6,618 2,817 3,802 9,305 80,733 16,849 6,970 3,009 3,960 9,879 1969 1970 82,715 17,829 7,246 3,132 4,114 10,583 84,113 18,718 7,453 3,181 4,272 11,265 1971 86,542 20,034 8,024 3,398 4,626 12,010 1972 1973 88,714 21,132 8,461 3,636 4,825 12,671 91,011 21,898 8,813 3,772 5,041 13,085 1974 EMPLOYED (thousands) 57,039 10,738 3,909 1,573 2,336 6,829 1947 58,344 10,963 4,028 1,602 2,426 6,937 1948 1949 57,649 10,371 3,712 1,466 2,246 6,659 58,920 10,449 3,703 1,433 2,270 6,746 1950 59,962 10,088 3,767 1,575 2,192 6,321 1951 1952 60,254 9,289 3,718 1,626 2,092 5,571 1953 61,181 8,945 3,719 1,577 2,142 5,226 4,971 1954 60,110 8,446 3,475 1,422 2,053 1955 62,171 8,914 3,643 1,500 2,143 5,271 1956 63,802 9,364 3,818 1,647 2,171 5,546 1937 64,071 9,418 3,750 1,613 2,167 5,638 63,036 9,152 3,582 1,519 2,063 5,576 1958 1959 64,630 9,708 3,838 1,670 2,168 5,875 1960 65,778 10,249 4,129 1,769 2,360 6,124 4,107 1,621 2,486 6,232 1961 65,746 10,338 1962 66,702 10,641 4,195 1,607 2,588 6,443 67,762 11,070 4,255 1,751 2,504 6,819 1963 1964 69,305 11,820 4,516 2,013 2,503 7,309 71,088 12,738 5,036 2,074 2,962 7,702 1965 72,895 13,684 5,721 2,269 3,452 7,969 1966 1967 74,372 14,181 5,682 2,333 3,349 8,490 1968 75,920 14,542 5,780 2,403 3,377 8,760 1969 77,902 15,436 6,117 2,573 3,543 9,319 78,627 15,860 6,141 2,596 3,545 9,719 1970 1971 79,120 16,339 6,195 2,587 3,608 10,144 81,702 17,616 6,722 2,770 3,952 10,894 1972 84,409 18,923 7,236 3,008 4,228 11,687 1973 1974 85,936 19,305 7,403 3,079 4,324 11,902 FORD & 07/890 LIBRARY 212 1975 Manpower Report of the President Table A-6. Employment Status of Young Workers 16 to 24 Years Old: Annual Averages, 1947-74-- Continued 16 to 19 years Employment status and year Total. 16 years Total, 16 to 20 to 24 and over 24 years Total 16 and 17 18 and 19 years UNEMPLOYED (thousands) 1947 2,311 930 414 177 237 516 1948 2,276 863 407 178 229 456 1949 3,637 1,255 575 238 337 680 1950 3,288 1,074 513 226 287 561 1951 2,055 609 336 168 168 273 1952 1,883 613 345 180 165 268 1953 1,834 563 307 150 157 256 1954 3,532 005 501 221 280 504 1955 2,852 846 450 211 239 396 1956 2,750 873 478 231 247 395 1957 2,859 925 496 230 266 429 1958 4,602 1,379 678 299 379 701 1959 3,740 1,197 654 301 353 543 1960 3,852 1,294 711 324 387 583 1961 4,714 1,550 828 363 465 722 1962 3,911 356 720 311 409 636 1963 4,070 1,541 883 420 463 638 1964 3,786 1,532 872 435 437 660 1965 3,366 1,431 874 411 463 557 1966 2,875 1, 281 836 395 441 445 1967 2,975 1,350 838 401 438 512 1968 2,817 1,382 839 413 425 543 1969 2,831 1,413 853 436 417 560 1970 4,088 1,959 1,105 536 569 864 1971 4,993 2,378 1,257 594 663 1,121 1972 4,840 2,418 1,302 628 674 1,116 1973 4, 4,304 2. 210 1,225 628 597 985 1974 5,076 2. 592 410 692 717 1,182 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 1947 19 8.0 9.6 10.1 9.2 7.2 1948 18 7.3 9.2 10.0 8.6 6.2 1949 5.9 10.8 13.4 14.0 13. 0 9.3 1950 5.3 9.3 12.2 13.6 11.2 7.7 1951 3.3 5.7 12 9.6 7.1 4.1 1952 3.0 6.2 8.5 10.0 7.3 4.6 1953 29 5.9 7.6 8.7 6.8 4.7 1954 5.5 10.6 126 13.5 120 9.2 1955 4.4 8.7 11.0 123 10.0 7.0 1956 4.1 8.5 11.1 12 3 10.2 6.6 1957 4.3 9.0 11.6 12 5 10.9 7.1 1958 6.8 13.1 15.9 16. 4 15. 5 11.2 1959 5.5 11.0 14.6 15. 3 14. 0 8.5 1960 5.5 11.2 14.7 15. 5 14. 1 8.7 1961 6.7 13.0 16.8 18. 3 15. 8 10.4 1962 5.5 11.3 14.6 16.2 13. 6 9.0 1963 5.7 12.2 17.2 19.3 15. 6 8.8 1964 5.2 11.5 16.2 17.8 14.9 8.3 1965 4.5 10.1 14.8 16. 5 12. 5 6.7 1966 18 8.6 127 14.8 11. 3 5.3 1967 1.8 8.7 12. 9 14.7 11. 6 5.7 1968 1.6 8.7 127 14.7 11. 2 5.8 1969 15 8.4 12. 2 14. 5 10. 5 5.7 1970 4.9 11.0 15. 3 17.1 13. 8 2.2 1971 5.9 12.7 16.9 18.7 15. 5 9.9 1972 5.6 121 16. 2 18.5 14. 6 9.3 1973 4.9 10.5 14.5 17. 3 12. 4 7.8 1974 5.6 11. 8 16.0 18.4 14. 2 9.0 FORD LIBRARY 213 1975 Manpower Report of the President 564-366 o 75 . 15 Table A-1. Employment Status of the Noninstitutional Population 16 Years and Over, by Sex: Annual Averages, 1947-74 [Numbers in thousands] Total labor force, In- cluding Armed Forces Civilian labor force Total noninsti- Percent Employed Unemployed Not in Sex and year tutional of labor popula- Number noninsti- Total force tion tutional Agricul- Nonagri- Percent of populs- Total ture cultural Number labor tion Industries force BOTH SEXES 1947 103,418 60,941 58.9 59,350 57,039 7,891 49,148 2,311 3.9 42, 42,477 1948 104,527 62,080 59.4 60,621 58,344 7,629 50,711 2,276 38 42,447 1949 105,611 62,903 59.6 61,286 57,649 7,656 49,990 3,637 5.9 42,708 1950 106,645 63,858 59.9 62,208 58,920 7,160 51,752 3,288 5.3 42,787 1951 107,721 65,117 60.4 62,017 59,962 6,726 53,230 2,055 13 42,604 1952 108,823 65,730 60.4 62,138 60,254 6,501 53,748 1,883 3.0 43,093 1953 110,601 66,560 60.2 63,015 61,181 6,261 54,915 1,834 29 44,041 1954 111,671 66,993 60.0 63,643 60,110 6,206 53,898 3,532 5.5 44,678 1955 112,732 68,072 60. 65,023 62,171 6,449 55,718 2,852 4.4 44,660 1956 113,811 69,409 61.0 66,552 63,802 6,283 57,506 2,750 41 44,402 1957 115,065 69,729 60.6 66,929 64,071 5,947 58,123 2,859 43 45,336 1958 116,363 70,275 60.4 67,639 63,036 5,586 57,450 4,602 6.8 46,088 1959 117,881 70,921 60.2 68,369 64,630 5,565 59,065 3,740 5.5 46,960 1960 119,759 72,142 60.2 69,628 65,778 5,458 60,318 3,852 5.5 47,617 1961 121,343 73,031 60. 70,459 65,746 5,200 60,546 4,714 6.7 48,312 1962 122,981 73,442 59.7 70,614 66,702 4,944 61,759 3,911 5.5 49,539 1963 125,154 74,571 59.6 71,833 67,762 4,687 63,076 4,070 5.7 50,583 1964 127,224 75,830 59.6 73,091 69,305 4,523 64,782 3,786 12 51,394 1965 129,236 77,178 59.7 74,455 71,088 4,361 66,726 3,366 45 52,058 1966 131,180 78,893 60.1 75,770 72,895 3,979 68,915 2,875 38 52,288 1967 133,319 80,793 60.6 77,347 74,372 3,844 70,527 2,975 38 52,527 1968 135,562 82,272 60.7 78,737 75,920 3,817 72,103 2,817 3.6 53,291 1969 137,841 84,239 61.1 80,733 77,902 3,606 74,296 2,831 3.5 53,602 1970 140,182 85,903 61.3 82,715 78,627 3,462 75,165 4,088 4.9 54,280 1971 142,596 86,929 61.0 84,113 79,120 3,387 75,732 4,993 5.9 55,666 1972 145,775 88,991 61.0 86,542 81,702 3,472 78,230 4,840 5.6 56,785 1973 148,263 91,040 61.4 88,714 84,409 3,452 80,967 4,304 4.9 57,222 1974 150,827 93,240 61.8 91,011 85,936 3,492 82,443 5,076 5.6 57,587 MALE 1947 50,968 44,258 86.8 42,686 40,994 6,643 34,351 1,692 4.0 6,710 1948 51,439 44,729 87.0 43,286 41,726 6,358 35,366 1,539 3.6 6,710 1949 51,922 45,097 86.9 43,498 40,926 6,342 34,581 2,572 5.9 6,825 1950 52,352 45,446 86.8 43,819 41,580 6,001 35,573 2,239 5.1 6,906 1951 52,788 46,063 87.3 43,001 41,780 5,533 36,243 1,221 28 6,725 1952 53,248 46,416 87.2 42,869 41,684 5,389 36,292 1,185 28 6,832 1953 54,248 47,131 $6.9 43,633 42,431 5,253 37,175 1,302 28 7,117 1954 54,706 47,275 66.4 43,965 41,620 5,200 36,414 2,344 5.3 7,431 1955 55,122 47,458 86.2 44,475 42,621 5,263 37,354 1,854 4.2 7,634 1956 55,547 47,914 86.3 45,091 43,380 5,039 38,334 1,711 3.8 7,633 1957 56,082 47,964 85.5 45,197 43,357 4,824 38,532 1,841 41 8,118 1958 56,640 48,126 85.0 45,521 42,423 4,596 37,827 3,098 6.8 8,514 1959 57,312 48,405 81.5 45,886 43,466 4,532 38,934 2,420 5.3 8,907 1960 58,144 48,870 84.0 46,388 43,904 4,472 39,431 2,486 5.4 9,274 1961 58,826 49,193 83.6 46,653 43,656 4,298 39,359 2,997 6.4 9,633 1962 59,626 49,395 82.8 46,600 44,177 4,069 40,108 2,423 5.2 10,231 1963 60,627 49,835 82.2 47,129 44,657 3,809 40,849 2,472 5.2 10,792 1964 61,556 50,387 81.9 47,679 45,474 3,691 41,782 2,205 4.6 11,169 1965 62,473 50,946 81.5 48,255 46,340 3,547 42,792 1,914 4.0 11,527 1966 63,351 51,500 81.4 48,471 46,919 3,243 43,675 1,551 32 11,792 1967 64,316 52,398 81.5 48,987 47,479 3,164 44,315 1,508 3.1 11,919 1968 65,345 53,030 81.2 49,533 48,114 3,157 44,957 1,419 29 12,315 1969 66,365 53,088 80.9 50,221 48,818 2,963 45,854 1,403 28 12,677 1970 67,409 54,343 80.6 51,195 48,960 2,861 46,099 2,235 4.4 13,066 1971 68,512 54,797 80.0 52,021 49,245 2,790 46,455 2,776 5.3 13,715 1972 69,864 55,671 79.7 53,365 50,630 2,839 47,791 2,635 4.9 14.193 1973 71,020 56,479 79.5 54,203 51,963 2,833 49,130 2,240 4.1 14,541 1974 72,253 57,349 79.4 55,186 52,519 2,901 49,618 2,668 4.8 14,904 FEMALE 1947 52,450 16,683 31.8 16,664 16,045 1,248 14,797 619 3.7 35,767 1948 53,088 17,351 32.7 17,335 16,618 1,271 15,345 717 4.1 35,737 1949 53,689 17,806 33.2 17,788 16,723 1,314 15,409 1,065 6.0 35,883 1930 54,203 18,412 33.9 18,389 17,340 1,159 16,179 1,049 5.7 35,881 1951 54,933 19,054 34.7 19,016 18,182 1,193 16,987 834 4.4 35,879 1952 55,575 19,314 34.8 19,269 18,570 1,112 17,456 698 3.6 36,261 1953 56,353 19,429 34.5 19,382 18,750 1,008 17,740 632 3.3 36,924 1954 56,905 19,718 31.6 19,678 18,490 1,006 17,484 1,188 6.0 37,247 1955 57,610 20,584 35.7 20,548 19,550 1,184 18,364 VUM 4.9 37,026 1956 58,264 21,495 36.9 21,461 20,422 1,244 19,172 1,039 4.8 36,769 1957 58,983 21,765 36.9 21,732 20,714 1,123 19,591 1,018 4.7 37,218 1958 59,723 22,149 37.1 22,118 20,613 990 19,623 1,504 6.8 37,574 1959 60,569 22,516 37.2 22,453 21,164 1,033 20,131 1,320 5.9 34,053 1900 61,615 23,272 37.8 23,210 21,874 956 20,887 1,366 5.9 35,343 1961 62,517 23,838 38.1 23,806 22,000 902 21,187 1,717 7.2 38,679 1962 63,355 24,047 3a.0 24,014 22,525 875 21,651 1,488 6.2 39,308 1963 64,527 21,736 36.3 24,704 23,105 878 22,27 1,598 6.5 39,791 1964 65,668 25,443 38.7 25,412 23,831 832 23,000 1,581 6.2 40,223 1965 66,763 26,232 3.3 26,200 24,748 814 23,934 1,452 5.5 40,531 1966 67,829 27,333 40.3 27,299 25,976 736 25,240 1,324 4.8 40,456 1967 60,003 24,395 41.2 24,360 26,893 GAO 26,212 1,468 5.2 40,608 1968 70,217 29,242 41.6 25,204 27,807 600 27,147 1,357 4.8 40,978 1969 71,476 30,551 42.7 30,512 29,081 613 28,441 1,428 4.7 40,924 1970 72,774 31,500 43.4 31,520 29,667 Gol 29,006 1,853 5.9 41,214 1971 74,084 32,132 43.4 32,091 29,875 5'm 29,277 2,217 6.9 41,952 1972 75,911 33,320 43.9 33,277 31,072 633 30,439 2,206 6.6 42,591 1973 77,242 34,561 41.7 34,510 32,416 619 31,827 2,064 60 42,681 1974 78,575 35,892 45.7 35,825 33,417 552 31,825 2,408 6.7 42,683 FORD 203 1975 Manpower Report of the President