Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
16987821
label
Energy Independence Authority (6)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
16987821
contentType
document
title
Energy Independence Authority (6)
collections
James M. Cannon Files (Ford Administration)
James Cannon's Issues Files
subjects
Energy policy
Legislation
Vice-Presidents
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
16987821
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-11-30
month
11
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1975-03-01
month
3
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
0e91082ae8e37696
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 13, folder "Energy Independence Authority (6)" of the James M. Cannon Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 13 of the James M. Cannon Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON REQUEST October 14, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR JIM CANNON FROM PAUL MYER w SUBJECT: E. I. A. It is my understanding that due to drafting technicalities, the EIA legislation has been referred only to the Congres- sional Banking Committees. This in itself has given rise to rumors of attempts to intentionally kill the bill or gaining the political advantage of potentially embarrassing hearings for the Administration. Overall, these Committees should not be looked to for the fair consideration of the legislation. In fact, early indications point to plans for a slow and embarrassing burial of the concept. Beyond these obvious political concerns, substantially, few of the Committees' FORD members have expertise in the energy field. Per your request, the following are some tentative comments GERALD on the possible views among Committee members on EIA: House Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing (42 members -- 28 Democrats, 14 Republicans): Chairman Henry Reuss has made public statements indicating general opposition to the EIA concept. The ranking Republican, Albert Johnson of Pennsylvania, is unknown to me. The Democrats are generally liberal and independent legislators with strong partisan views. Reuss maintains no effective control or leadership over them and the Committee remains as unwieldly and chaotic as it was under Patman. Most of the Republicans are strong individual- ists and they are fairly balanced between the generally senior conservative members and more moderate junior members. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs (14 members -- 8 Democrats, 5 Republicans) : Chairman William Proxmire's public statements indicate strong opposition. Simi- larly, the ranking Republican member, John Tower, has expressed negative views. My brief comments on the other members are as follows: -2- Sparkman --- unknown. Williams - will follow AFL-CIO line. McIntyre -- unknown; potential impact on New England region could influence views. Cranston -- unknown, probably opposed. Stevenson --- probably opposed; anti-oil company role in Senate energy debates. Biden -- unknown; unpredictable. Morgan -- unknown. Brooke -- unknown; should be considered as one of few possible supporters. Packwood -- staff comments indicate a possible interest in the concept; wanted to see detailed legislative pro- visions. Helms -- unknown; assume conservative opposition. Garn - unknown. I briefly chatted with Glenn Schleede on Friday. Zarb will be calling a meeting this week to plan FEA's strategy. I need your further guidance as to if and how I am to be involved in this matter. FORD LIBRARY & 938839 Committees of the House 285 INTELLIGENCE (SPECIAL) Lucien N. Nedzi, of Michigan, Chairman Bob Wilson, of California, Ranking Minority Member Banking, Currency, and Housing (Suite 2129, phone 54247, meets first and third Tuesdays) Henry S. Reuss, of Wisconsin. Albert W. Johnson, of Pennsylvania. Wright Patman, of Texas. J. William Stanton, of Ohio. William A. Barrett, of Pennsylvania. Garry E. Brown, of Michigan. Leonor Kretzer (Mrs. John B.) Sullivan, Chalmers P. Wylie, of Ohio. of Missouri. John H. Rousselot, of California. Thomas L Ashley, of Ohio. Stewart B. McKinney, of Connecticut. William S. Moorhead, of Pennsylvania. John B. Conlan, of Arizona. Joint Robert G. Stephens, Jf., of Georgia. George Hansen, of Idaho. Comms. Fernand J. St Germain, of Rhode Richard T. Schulze, of Pennsylvania. E Island. Willis D. Gradison, of Ohio. Henry B. Gonzalez of Texas. Henry J, Hyde, of Illinois. Com tee Joseph G. Minish, of New Jersey. Richard Kelly, of Florida. Frank Annunzio, of Illinois. Charles E: Grassley, of Iowa. Assign. Thomas M. Rees, of California. Millicent Fenwick, of New Jersey. James M. Hanley, of New York. Admin. Parren J. Mitchell, of Maryland. Assts. Walter E. Fauntroy, of the District of & Secs. Columbia. Lindy (Mrs. Hale) Boggs, of Louisians. Stephen L Neal, of North Carolina. Statis- Jerry M. Patterson, of California. tical James J. Blanchard, of Michigan. Andrew Maguire, of New Jersey. Harold E. Ford, of Tennessee. Carroll Hubbard, Jr., of Kentucky. Capi- tol John J. LaFalce, of New York. Gladys Noon Spellman, of Maryland. Les AuCoin, of Oregon. Paul E. Tsongas, of Massachusetts. Butler Derrick, of South Carolina. Depts. Philip Hayes, of Indiana. Mark .W. Hannaford, of California. Paul Nelson, Clerk and Staff Director Agencies SUBCOMMITTEES I DOMESTIC MONETARY POLICY Wright Patman, of Texas, Chairman John B. Conlan, of Arizona, Ranking Minority Member HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT William A. Barrett, of Pennsylvania, Chairman Garry Brown, of Michigan, Ranking Minority Member ECONOMIC STABILIZATION GERALD 4. FORD Date - MEDRARK Thomas L Ashley, of Ohio, Chairman Stewart B. McKinney, of Connecticut, Ranking Minority Member MEMORANDUM REQUESTED THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 15, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR JIM CANNON FROM PAUL MYER SUBJECT: EIA Committee Referral - House The referral of bills in the House of Representatives is subject to the provisions of Rule X, Rules of the House of Representatives, 94th Congress. The Speaker refers all bills to the Committee which has jurisdiction over the subject matter of any provision of the legislation. While bills are generally sent only to one committee, under the referral proce- dures (Rule X, 5 (c)), the Speaker may (1) refer the matter simultaneously to two or more committees for con- current consideration or consideration in sequence (sub- ject to time limitations), or (2) divide the matter into two or more parts (reflecting the different subjects and jurisdictions) and refer such part to a different committee, or (3) refer the matter to a special ad hoc committee appointed by the Speaker with approval of the House. A brief review of the present situation indicates that simultaneous referral for sequential or concurrent con- sideration to appropriate House committees would be the most desirable situation. Rule X also stipulates the jurisdiction of House Commit- tees. The initial referral of the Presidential message on EIA to Banking, Currency and Housing was based upon that Committee's jurisdiction over matters pertaining to "financial aid to commerce and industry." However, since the legislation has not been formally introduced in the House, I believe that referral to additional committees under Rule X, 5 (c) would be in order. GERALD FORD -2- A jurisdictional claim could possibly be made by three additional committees: Science and Technology, Joint Atomic Energy Committee, and Interstate and Foreign Commerce. From a practical and political standpoint, the Committee on Science and Technology would perhaps be the most advantageous. This Committee has jurisdic- tion over "all energy research and development except nuclear." Joint Atomic Energy, because of the nuclear research aspects, might therefore lay claim to a part of the bill. Certainly, Commerce, based on their past and present performance on energy policy would not be desir- able. In addition to the phone calls and contacts with Albert we discussed on the phone, co-sponsors from additional committees at the time of introduction could be helpful in determining the referral issue. FORD GERALD us + * @ * 7 n * OFFICE OF THE VICE PrESidENT WASHINGTON November 13, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR JIM CANNON FROM: Peter J. Wallison Peter SUBJECT; Energy Independence Authority In case you have not seen it, I have attached a statement by AFL-CIO President George Meany endorsing the Energy Independence Authority. If you have any questions, please call. Attachment from AFL- CIO DEPARTMENT RELATIONS (202) 637-5010 For Release: A.M. PAPERS, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14. 1975 AFL-CIO President George Meany today made the following statement: On the basis of the analysis and recommendations of the AFL-CIO Energy Policy Committee, the AFL-CIO endorses the concept of the Energy Independence Authority, a proposal initiated by Vice President Rockefeller and introduced in the Congress by the Ford Administration. Private industry, left to itself, cannot and will not resolve the energy crisis which still plagues this nation. The American people should not be deluded by the current easy availability of energy supplies. While the gas lines have disappeared, the dependence of the United States on oil from insecure foreign sources still exists. This nation is more vulnerable to an Arab oil embargo today than in 1973. Government must provide the inititative and incentive for development of energy projects that will place this nation on the road to energy independence. It is estimated that capital in the amount of $600 to $800 billion will be needed in the next ten years to finance investments for energy independence. Most projects would be capitalized from private sources; however, those deemed vital to the national interest but unable to secure private capital, would be financed through a new government corporation with authority to make direct loans, provide loan guarantees, and other financial assistance to energy independence projects. While the AFL-CIO does endorse the creation of an Energy Independence Authority and the basic program set forth in the bill, we expect to have a number of proposals for improvements in the specific terms of this measure. At the proper time, we will testify before Congress on the legislation and will make detailed proposals and suggestions to strengthen the bill. The federation's Energy Policy Committee --- composed of Secretary- Treasurer Lane Kirkland, Vice Presidents Paul Hall, Martin Ward, William Sidell, A. F. Grospiron, Murray Finley and Joseph Keenan -- will continue its study of this and other proposals. -30- The AFL- CIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC RELATIONS (202) 637-5010 For Release: EIA A.M. PAPERS, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14. 1975 F₁ 6 AFL-CIO President George Meany today made the following statement: On the basis of the analysis and recommendations of the AFL-CIO Energy Policy Committee, the AFL-CIO endorses the concept of the Energy Independence Authority, a proposal initiated by Vice President Rockefeller and introduced in the Congress by the Ford Administration. Private industry, left to itself, cannot and will not resolve the energy crisis which still plagues this nation. The American people should not be deluded by the current easy availability of energy supplies. While the gas lines have disappeared, the dependence of the United States on oil from insecure foreign sources still exists. This nation is more vulnerable to an Arab oil embargo today than in 1973. Government must provide the inititative and incentive for development of energy projects that will place this nation on the road to energy independence. It is estimated that capital in the amount of $600 to $800 billion will be needed in the next ten years to finance investments for energy independence. Most projects would be capitalized from private sources; however, those deemed vital to the national interest but unable to secure private capital, would be financed through a new government corporation with authority to make direct loans, provide loan guarantees, and other financial assistance to energy independence projects. While the AFL-CIO does endorse the creation of an Energy Independence Authority and the basic program set forth in the bill, we expect to have a number of proposals for improvements in the specific terms of this measure. At the proper time, we will testify before Congress on the legislation and will make detailed proposals and suggestions to strengthen the bill. The federation's Energy Policy Committee -- composed of Secretary- Treasurer Lane Kirkland, Vice Presidents Paul Hall, Martin Ward, William Sidell, A. F. Grospiron, Murray Finley and Joseph Keenan - will continue its study of this and other proposals. FORD -30- GERALD R. * OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON November 18, 1975 Fili MEMORANDUM FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT FROM: ROGER W. HOOKER, JR. Roger SUBJECT; EIA Attached, as introduced by Bob Griffin, at my request, in yesterday's Congressional Record are: 1. Your October 6 remarks on EIA before business executives here in Washington. 2. George Meany's endorsement of the concept on EIA. We are having these pages reproduced for further inexpensive distribution as appropriate. CC Peter Wallison Jim Cannon Dick Allison Jack Veneman Hugh Morrow Bob Armao 0802 LIBRATE & Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 94th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 121 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1975 No. 171 November 17, 1975 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE S 20185 Then as we got into the mid-60's OPEC had did was of course it really hit the coal indus- been formed and we became a net importer, try over the head BO that our greatest re- didn't have the reserves to dominate world source was least developed and had more prices and therefore triggered by the conflict problems and while gas when it was first in the Middle East, the Arab countries finally controlled was a byproduct of oil and was moved and in two years raised prices 500 being burned and therefore was in surplus. percent. The price that was set was so low that as TOWARD ENERGY INDEPENDENCE people shifted to gas they were unable to get At that point, particularly the Eastern Sea- Mr. GRIFFIN. Mr. President, on Oc- board of this country suffered quite a set- the production, the increased production or even if they could get production-like in tober 6, the Vice President addressed a back because of the boycott and the price the case of Texas-they couldn't ship it on meeting of business executives here in increase. The boycott, let's face it, there were the interstate lines. Washington on the energy problems. I enough leaks and there were enough coun- Now as you know-we had a meeting in commend his remarks to my colleagues, tries that didn't join it so that it really this room, as a matter of fact, with a group and ask unanimous consent that the text wasn't as overwhelming as it might have of Governors who came in organized by Jim be printed in the RECORD following my been.- Rhodes of Ohio pointing out that they had I was at that point Governor of New York lost 600,000 man days of work last year due remarks. In addition, Mr. President, AFL-CIO deeply concerned; but Libya allowed oil to go to the shortages of gas and it was going to to one of the British Islands in the Carib- be a lot-that was a warm winter-worse next President George Meany has endorsed bean and be refined there and come into New year and his people, the industrial groups the concept of the administration's en- York for power and so forth which if they in his State were willing to finance produc- ergy proposal and I ask unanimous con- had really tightened down we would have tion of gas at higher prices if they could sent that his statement be printed in the been in a much more difficult situation. just get permission to move it on interstate RECORD. The President, as you all know, spent a pipelines and the concept of a common car- There being no objection, the material lot of time discussing the economics and hav- rier be adopted rather than a regulated price. was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, ing the summit meetings when. he first took That has been very slow in coming because office last fall a year ago. One of the major the Federal Power Commission was afraid as follows: subjects was this question of energy. He that if they made such a ruling that they THE VICE PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS came out of those with a clear determination would be challenged in the courts by the I want to thank all of you very much for for energy independence as being essential ecologists and that they would then be over- coming here today and for giving me a chance for this country's national security; second, ruled. So they wanted legislation. to visit with you, try to outline first briefly that this should be achieved by 1985. I only mention this because where gov- the conceptual thinking in back of this pro- He then worked out the details of legisla- ernment stepped in to regulate one phase of gram and then answer or at least discuss your tion which would encourage private enter- the energy industry it totally disrupted the questions. I will do my best to answer them. prise because energy has always been a pri- industry and shows very- clearly what can I think the legislation will go up this week. vate enterprise operation in this country ex- happen through government regulation. The The subject is a complicated one and there cept for Nayal reserves, which would en- President, as you know, has fought regula- have been varying points of view as you all courage private enterprise to accelerate pro-- tion and he has been for decontrol. He know by reading the press. Therefore, it has duction-domestically. wanted an orderly decontrol on oil. He caused some difficulty in trying to get the I don't think we really have recognized wanted 39 months. But then we go back to thing worked out so that it could be put in quite as clearly as it seems to me the fact what has happened in Congress. He sent up detailed language for the legislation and the exists that this-because there is a great a 500 and some-page bill. deal of talk about the free market system- This bill was complicated and the public message. I hesitate to talk about the whole subject that the free market system should do this I don't think has really since the energy because I know everybody in this room is and that they should be the ones that with- crisis that they saw two years ago when totally familiar with the subject, but let me out Government intervention except through there were lines waiting for gasoline-has just for the record give you a brief outline a framework of laws which would give in- eased off. It was really sort of personified of the past and how it came about as to where centive. Allright. The framework of laws has never we are now. This country of course up to the 1960's was been achieved because one can speculate the major producer and exporter and had here-but first it is a complicated subject the reserves to export additional amounts if and it was complicated when-I have to necessary and so when on two or three occa- again go back a second. It was complicated sions other nations around the world tried when the United States Government con- to raise the prices of oil substantially, we just trolled the price of interstate gas at a very exported more and were able to hold the low price so that the most desirable fuel price. turns out to be the cheapest fuel. What it CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE November 17, 1975 at a meeting of the Midwestern Governors' $100 billion basis over ten years because that Or does one come to the conclusion reluc- where none other than Governor Exon asked is the life of the corporation, would prob- tantly or just as a suspicion even-not B. con- me if there really was an energy crisis. He ably average out to about $10 billion B year. clusion-that there would be those in Con- said, "How can there be an energy crisis If this country moves towards self-suffici- gress in the opposition party who would just when there is plenty of oil and gas around?" ency it would take $60 billion to $80 billion as soon have the issue or would just as soon I said, "You have really expressed the whole a year and so $10 billion is 12, 14 percent of see us run short of energy. have the Presi- thing right there. There is plenty of oil and the total that is required. dent take off controls because they lapsed gas around because we are importing now What would the conditions be in determ- and not be able to work out an orderly ex- almost 40 percent of our consumption." ing how this money would be used? The con- tension and then have perhaps chaotic con- Domestic consumption is going down. So ditions are simply two basically: One, that ditions in 1976 and maybe this would be as long as we import it there isn't a crisis it contributes to the self-sufficiency; two, politically advantageous? in the sense that you are thinking of it, but that it would be used for financing through One hesitates to even think that anyone if the Middle East situation blew up again private enterprise just as the Military buys for political purposes would be willing to see or if for some other reason other than price its equipment through private enterprise the Nation run the risks which we are run- or through a boycott we could then find where those objectives, those investments ning and have the people suffer in a way that ourselves in the middle of a full-blown cri- cannot be obtained by private enterprise they might suffer very easily were such a sis which for certain parts of the country themselves; in other words, where they chaotic situation exist. But one can't elimi- would be total disaster. And I don't either can't get the money or for some rea- nate that possibility entirely. think anyone has really figured out how son are unwilling, to; primarily can't get it, But whatever the situation is, there is no this country would survive & really effective can't get it because they can't earn. action. Therefore, we are in a stalemate. The boycott because we don't have transporta- If you take a look at the utility indus- problem is getting worse and we are up to tion from the west to the east to handle try-what, 70 percent of the atomic power now close to $30 billion with a 10 percent the movement of energy in sufficient quan- plants?-and of course atomic power is the increase in foreign exchange imports. Luck- tities to keep our operations going; our so- great potential we have in this country for 11y our farmers have been tremendously pro- ciety going. energy. The others are important, but the ductive. So they are producing a major new We just have seen a 10 percent increase long-term, major producer us energy is source of foreign exchange. Other areas have take effect in the world oil prices and as I atomic for the time being; solar and thermal, been able to export. So our balance of pay- say Congress has not taken any effective out further. ments is reasonable at the moment, but with action: little pieces of action, but no com- I will come back to gas, coal and oil in a consumption going up, with production go- prehensive action. Finally, the management- minute. But let's say these 70 percent or 70 ing down, with the depletion allowance taken labor committee had some concepts as to percent of the atomic power plants that off, with the old oil still under control-it is how to encourage through incentive industry were planned were cancelled. There is a whole not under control at the moment but pos- to invest more domestically. very complicated series of reasons as to why. sibly under control-nobody can afford to That legislation hasn't gotten off the Local regulations of the State Public Serv- put the money into the secondary retrieval launching pad in Congress. ice Commissions where they can't get rate of oil because it falls under old oil. So as I view the situation we find ourselves increases so they can't earn enough money to So that we have the situation where as I in a free market industry, but the free mar- be able to borrow the money is one factor. say our production is declining and our con- ket has been a world market. Now national Also you can't get the increase you are on sumption is increasing and nobody thinks policy expressed by the President is that we line with your power. These atomic power there is a crisis. should be a self-sufficient, independent pro- plants, most efficient ones, cost about $1 bil- Let's go to the areas that the Energy In- ducer of energy. We have the resources. No- lion. Therefore, you would have 81 billion up dependence Authority might serve. The best body knows yet at what price. That is a na- not for four years as it used to be, but now illustration is rubber reserve under Bernie tional policy superseding a free market posi- with all of the filings that you have to make Baruch in World War II which did a heck of tion because the free market was an inter- on impact statements, the local suits, it is a job. They contracted with six or seven pri- national one. Then a great many people up to between 10 and 11 years. So you have vate companies to develop synthetic rubber have felt that this OPEC price structure 81 billion tied up for 10 or 11 years with no production and of that group I think four would break down as production increased. basis for earning. That is one very good or five came through with processes or varia- Walter Levy who is one of the most so- reason. tions of a basic process which were success- phisticated people in the business and many Also uncertainties are another and all ful. They sold the company, the plants and of you know him, has said right along there kinds of regulations from Washington. The the process and we have a new industry in wasn't a chance; that they would do ex- labor-management recommendations were to the United States. It was a self-liquidating actly what they did do. He predicted that encourage and allow for a greater accumula- six or eight months ago, or even longer may- operation. tion of capital by corporations. This corporation, the concept of this be, that they would not decrease the price; Of course, the bill was immediately tagged corporation is a self-liquidating corporation they would not break the price; they would by the opposition as being just a special in- to finance those risks, which private enter- hold and they would increase the price. That terest bill for big business and big industry prise cannot or will not undertake at the is what has happened. and for capital rather than for the people So when people say that the use of Fed- present time to contribute to self-sufficiency which is an easy, cheap shot politically, but and do it to the maximum degree possible- eral funds through a structure that is in it isn't going to help the country. a sense comparable to the RFC conceptually, with private capital participation and So that bill hasn't gotten off. The real but not for bailouts, but for stimulating through private industry and then sell it as question has to be first how does govern- new industry or new production, and they rapidly as possible. ment when it has set a national policy that Let me take three or four different areas. say this is an allocation of capital and this cuts across a free market operation work is going to-take it from a whole lot of other First, we have ERDA. Some people say what with the industry in trying to work that out; do you need this for if you have ERDA? things, the answer on the allocation of cap- in this case domestic production? ERDA's powers go to laboratory experiments ital is very simple. The President has said our national policy is self-sufficiency by 1985. The first approach the President has was relating to energy. But they do not have the this very comprehensive legislation. funds or the authority to take those labora- The estimates vary between $600 billion and $800 billion will be required to achieve One has to ask is it that the Congress go- tory experiments and take them out onto a ing through this evolutionary change that full commercial production. Of course. here that object. That is out of about $4 trillion you move from a limited expense to a much $300 billion that has been estimated as in- all of our establishment institutions have larger expense. The commercial production dustry's capital requirements during this gone through is unable with such an over- is essential in order to find out what the cost ten-year period for meeting needs of the whelming majority by the opposition to the of energy would be. American people and our responsibilities in Executive Branch-in other words, the For instance, gasification of coal is being the world. Democratic Party as distinct from the Re- done and so its liquefaction of coal in South We will fall short of that as estimated- publican Party-is it unable to organize it- Africa. It comes out between $30 and $40 a again these are all estimates; therefore, they self and does the committee structure of 300 barrel equivalent energy. But it does produce are just guestimates-fall short by about different committees which the Congress has gas. It is essential. $600 billion. in both Houses, is it so cumbersome and does There are new methods that can come up So there is going to be a shortage. Nobody it involve so many committees when you that would take a little longer to go down knows how much money will come back into have a comprehensive piece of legislation of the line which might reduce it to $20 a barrel investments from Arab countries where the this kind, does this make it impossible for equivalent of oil or even down to $11, plus accumulation of capital is taken place. But the Congress to act effectively and rapidly in the fact that there is then the possibility I would imagine that Saudi Arabia alone is the national interest through jurisdictional of In-Situ, drilling a hole down in the deep up to about $7 billion now in investment disputes, et cetera, et cetera and within the coal mine, setting off an explosion, setting it in treasuries. These securities, were this cor- House the Caucus which is in conflict with on fire: the heat does the same thing under- poration to be passed by the Congress on the the committees? ground that is done on top and you would CONGRESSIONAL RECORD SENATE 20187 the created by the burn- tion of shale, drill down, put off an explosion, catalyst to get or to help get us off dend underground. set it on fire, draw off the gas, the gasified center in becoming self-sufficient as a nation are those who feel that this will be oil and recondense it. across the board in all of these fields on B. a far cheaper method but an experiment like The Livermore Laboratories have done self-liquidating basis, that this is essential that would cost $200 million to find out. some work on this with Edward Teller and for our national security, to our industrial A gasification plant, surface plant is about they feel, although nobody else is willing yet growth, to employment. That is a pretty good 81 billion. There is a need for 18 to 24 sur- to agree with them, that this might be pro- combination of the three. face gasification plants, traditional, known, duced at the rate of between the cost of 87 If we don't do it, in my opinion, there are proven style right now for the next-having and $8 a barrel. elements in this country and some of them to be built right now if we are going to meet If it were that, this would be one of the in the Congress who would like to see in- the gas supplies and this is what the gas in- great bonanzas that has happened to this dustry fail and not be able to meet the needs dustry is looking for. There right away is $18 country. It would be fantastic. of the country and then say, fine, we told billion to $24 billion to produce gas the most The Occidental company is the only com- you the system was no good; that capitalism expensive way. Some may have to be produced. Laws pany that I know that has done any major doesn't work; that private enterprise doesn't work in the field but they can't afford this work. Therefore, we have got to take it over. change. We can get them changed so that gas can be purchased in another area, sur- kind of an experiment. Then we will move as the British moved plus gas and piped through the interstate Many of the companies bought I think taking over one industry after another and gas system. It is complicated. But that is over $1 billion in leases out in Colorado for of course the problems that grow out of that; one area. shale, but they were going to do surface then they start subsidizing; then unlimited Coal, of course, gets tied up with the whole mining. None of them have gone ahead be- capacity to pay and, therefore, you get into ecological problem. I visited out in Wyoming, cause of the uncertainties and the ecological the most difficult situation and the most Gillette, one of the most fascinating mines problems. So-that is another area. dangerous situation where you have neither where they took off 23 feet of surface, then Then you come down-I have covered the a capitalist system nor a socialist system and 70 feet of coal, clay underneath; they took coal, oil, gas; not covered it but mentioned you have the worst of both and nobody can the topsoil off first, stacked it; then took the them-to the question of electricity through make an investment because they don't know rest off, put it behind where they are digging atomic. what the conditions are going to be, what the the hole and then end up by putting the One of the standard methods of financing, regulations are going to be, what the re- topsoil back on, making six lakes, 6,000 acres. whether it is airplanes or a lot of other sources are going to be. Therefore, you have The only difference you will find is you will things in this country, is the lease purchase a plurality and we have higher unemploy- have lakes which you never had before. operation where somebody finances an air- ment and demand for more expenditures by The growth will be as good if not better plane and the company purchases it. It is the Federal Government which the President and the only other difference is it will be 123 perfectly conceivable that an atomic power has had the courage to resist to a degree that feet lower than it was before. But I was plant costing 81 billion could be financed by is perfectly extraordinary and if he didn't, we there. The antelope were grazing still right the government under a contract with a pri- would have more inflation. around where the mining operation was vate company for lease purchase with a con- This is then also I would say to you, those going on. This whole mine which produces tract with the Public Service Commission who study this question, that Fabian social- 20,000-I guess 20 million tons a year, has 55 that as and when it comes on line the rates ists like inflation because that is the quickest people. Everything is automated, the whole will be such that this company can earn way to equalize capital that you can do in thing. It is a superb operation. In other words, it can be done. But they had to build whatever is necessary to pay back. any country. You don't have to expropriate their own railroad to get it to the main line. The President in his message to the Con- anything Just people's values are gone be- gress in January said we need 200 atomic cause inflation just wipes them out and the They are servicing midwestern cities. If you power plants by 1985. We now have maybe 60. Germans went through that and we know want-let's say if as a nation we decide or The remaining ones, 70 percent were can- what happened from that. it proves to be feasible-to produce low- celled. California has the proposition next So I would just like to say that while this sulfur coal in the west and the ecological problems are worked out and this whole June banning all atomic power plants in Call- has been opposed and we all know that be- cause you all read it in the papers; because thing has got to be done so that we don't fornia; and Oregon on Friday; they have got one of the same. it says it would be a first step towards gov- get our energy at the expense of our environ- If this country bans atomic power plants ernment takeover. ment. I am confident we can do both to- and we don't move in these other fields, we The President has already said we have to gether and the research can be done together. are going to be totally in a situation which have an allocation of capital. He has asked But then you come to the problem that a lot of railroads can only move coal cars at the there are some ecologists who would like to private enterprise to do it. So it isn't a ques- rate of ten miles'an hour because of the con- see a no-growth society. A no-growth society tion of taking the capital from housing and means no jobs for the young people that are all of these other areas that people talk dition of the roadbeds. There is about 811 coming on because our whole society has been about. There is plenty of money right now billion of roadbed work to be done in this geared to increased employment based on in- in the savings and loan associations. People country. creased productivity. haven't got enough confidence to invest in It is also conceivable that this corporation I happen to think that that is the hallmark housing. So it isn't that. could loan, but I don't think the railroads of America. It is our strength. It is our suc- Secondly, as far as a step towards socialism, can borrow money. Therefore, they might buy cess and that we can do the ecological side of I think it is exactly the opposite. I think it preferred stock in a railroad to give them the this problem plus the development side. is government's showing their concern for funds or to invest the funds to fix up their You come to industry itself and energy. I the present system, free enterprise and capi- roadbeds which could then be earned out of don't know. There are close to 18 States that tal and that they are trying to help stimu- coal: all of this being contingent upon a are going to be in a serious condition-in- late and bridge over this period, conversion of eastern plants from oil to coal. dustries in 18 States-if they don't get gas There is one other thing I forgot to say If they do, they have got to have coal. The this winter. But here is how complicated this and then I will stop; that is, that the Federal coal has got to be produced. It has got to be gets. If we have a cold winter, even if the Energy Administration would have the re- transported so that you have got to have the interstate pipelines are allowed to be used, sponsibility of acting as the clearing house government in a position or somebody in a there is going to still be a shortage because for all of the ecological and regulatory func- position to be the catalyst, the fallback posi- there isn't enough gas being produced to tions that government has at State and Fed- tion where private enterprise cannot or will sell. eral levels, State, Federal and local levels. not finance the effort to achieve this That means that industry which depends So all of them would be cleared through independence. on gas and gas is a small percentage, whether this. They would then make recommenda- All of it then could be sold. No loans are it is textiles in South Carolina or glass in tions to simplify these structures based on made after; no commitments made after ten Pennsylvania or what not, they all need it, their experience. Any private operation which years. but it is a small percentage of their cost. was investing in capital to achieve energy Oil, we have got twice as much oil in shale So they would then go in and probably buy self-sufficiency could also use this corpora- as you all know in this country as the Arabs up propane because they could come in and tion as the clearing house for all of its con- have oil in the Middle East in known reserves. buy propane. But propane gas is what the tacts with government. The problem is to get it out. You can mine farmers depend on to dry their crops and to So that they could get a system which the shale. You can cook the oil out. Then you heat their homes and they are small buyers. would accelerate and maybe cut down on the end up with what I call talcum powder which They are not big buyers. So the next thing time because with a loss or time due to the is in a much larger volume than the shale you would have to have would be control of delays and the suits that take place. This is you have mined because it has been cooked propane and it is just going to take this gov- a very, very serious thing in terms of cost and 80 it is not dissolved. There is very little ernment one by one further and further into and expense. water where the shale is. Therefore, what do controls and the more government gets into I would also say the way the legislation is you do with the stuff? You could fill a valley controls in my opinion the more they distort being drafted it would give the board the but if you have a heavy wind, this stuff is the economy and make it difficult for us to discretion, a five-man board the discretion going to blow all over the west. get back on a sound basis. so that there wouldn't be a basis for suits. Again, you can do an experiment for $200 Therefore, in conclusion, It seems to me In other words, you couldn't sue the cor- million of trying to develop In-Situ produc- that this idea of the government acting as a poration for a decision because all of the key 20188 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE November 17, 1975 decisions are left to the judgment of the type of plant such as the rubber plants in willingly enter into such contracts, but If board. World War II. Is there any way you are going you do you could do that right now without Therefore, there aren't criteria and there- to insure that this legislation is 60 worded having to have the lease-back arrangement fore hopefully we can keep this from getting that someone of a different philosophical and the Federal Government build the another-I hope too many of you aren't outlook cannot turn this energy independ- plants. lawyers because I don't want to cut down ence agency into a Federal oil and gas cor- The VICE PRESIDENT. Great. Then we on the business-but hopefully we can get poration running the same way as TVA? wouldn't have to put any Federal money in. this thing so that we can get It rolling and The VICE PRESIDENT. It requires that every- QUESTION. I would think that would be get action fast and decisions made the way thing be sold and that it be self-liquidat- the place to look; is the Federal Government they are done in private enterprise as dis- ing and it be done through private enter- using its influence with the State commis- tinct from the way they are done too often prise and with private enterprise participa- sions to get the rates up? That will bring in government. tion. I think the private enterprise participa- the capital in and you won't have to build That I think is the summary. Any ques- tion is one of the most important. For in- the plants through the government. tions we can get into would develop details stance, if you build a power plant, atomic The VICE PRESIDENT. There is only one flaw of the situation, but that in essence is the power plant under lease purchase contract in your argument, if you will forgive me-at summary. with a contract with the Public Service Com- least a political flaw; and, that is, as one who I should say perhaps what makes me think mission, you actually then have 8 contrac- only two years ago left Governorship and who it will go through Congress. This is some- tual relationship so that the ownership, un- saw the beginning of the pressures due to, thing that labor wants very badly. It is jobs less somebody abrogates the contract, is in first, ecology on using non-sulphur fuels and through industry and not jobs through dole. the hands or will be in the hands of the the increased cost in getting the non-sulphur Therefore, I am pretty sure labor is going private enterprise. Nothing will be done coal, non-sulphur oil; then the embargo and to give it very strong support. If industry where the government sets up some new then the world price increase of 500 percent. at the same time feels it is desirable and form of TVA. These poor public service commissioners have worthwhile and gives it support, then I think It happens that the Governor of Pennsyl- had to take double and triple the cost of its passage has got very great. potential. vania who is a declared candidate for the electricity to consumers, if not more. If industry is opposed to it, that will nul- Fresidency, Governor Schapp, has got a pro- Their problem is right now that they have lify labor support and probably nothing gram he has been trying to get-I don't know gone through 80 many increases-this is true would happen. But I think it is a turning whether it has surfaced yet-other Gover- because I was very close to the commission point for this country and if we don't have nors in the Eastern Seaboard to join in spon- there and when I got a new commissioner, energy we are not going to have growing in- soring which involves a TVA at the mine Chairman of the Commission, who had been dustry; if we don't have a growing industry, heads to produce electricity at the mine a strong consumer advocate, I said, "Look, we are not going to have jobs and we are heads which would be owned by the govern- in your advocacy of the protection of the going to have a lot of problems. We have ment, mined and then distributed from consumer do you include-this is before I got them, but they will be worse. there. offered him the job-the protection of the So that I think-that we are on the verge. consumers' need for additional power in the Thank you. Are there any questions? I flew to the coast Thursday night with & future? If so, do you visualize that that is QUESTION. Mr Vice President, could you Senator who has introduced a bill to break going to take higher rates and more money relate this program to the $6 billion syn- up the oil business and have just producers, in order to get the capital in?" He said, "I thetic fuel program that we read about re- distributors, marketers, each one would be read you. I agree with you and you have no cently? Is it part of it? in a separate company. I only mention that. problem." I took him on. The VICE PRESIDENT. The $6 billion syn- This is a Republican and it shows that people He did a superb job. He was pilloried by thetic fuel program is one that Senator Jack- are looking in Congress for ways-or politi- the public. He was sued by my own attorney son has proposed. It hasn't passed yet. So cal in political life-of being responsive to general. (Laughter) It was purely political. I what we did in the thinking on this was to the public but not, in my opinion, too clear love him, too, and he was sued by the city. just make a provision that they would be as to what the impact would be on our In other words, these people have been in complimentary if that passes. In other words, system. the most difficult political situations because of course, that is an outright expenditure. Sir: every consumer of electricity-I can only In other words, that is government putting QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, you indi- speak for New York, but I suppose it is very the money in the budget expenditure. This cated that this authority would be able to similar in other parts-has just gone through other one is a loan or an investment or a produce hopefully about 14 percent, I believe the most unbelievable increases in cost. guarantee of a loan and on a self-liquidat- you said, of the energy needed? So my reason for thinking what I say is ing basis. So that is the difference. But if The VICE PRESIDENT. Capital. they would be so glad to see something built that one passes, fine. Whatever they do that QUESTION. Of the capital. that will protect the needs of the community wouldn't have to be done here. The VICE PRESIDENT. Of the capital needed but doesn't have to raise the rates until fur- So that they will be totally complimentary. to meet the self-sufficiency. ther down the road when they may not even QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, you men- QUESTION. Is there some way this could be be on the commission. (Laughter) They tioned many of the traditional sources of helpful if private industry does not come would be very happy, in my opinion-this is energy but you hardly touched on solar forth with the other 86? Do you think there a political judgment-to sign a contract for energy. I wonder. Here is one that has few is any problem in that other 86 being raised the future whereas they could not go through ecological problems and would it be partic- during that period of time? another major increase now particularly as ipating in this program and how? The VICE PRESIDENT. Let's take a case in the people aren't going to get the benefit for The VICE PRESIDENT. Again, solar energy point. Let's say they invested $200 million 11 years. The alternative to this is, what is and thermal energy are very important parts. in either an In-Situ gasification of coal or happening again in New York State where They are not large scale producers of energy In-Situ gasification of oil project and it we had an authority which was created to immediately, but they are very important proved to be within let's say lower cost of. develop hydro-electric power on the St. Law- parts of the program. Any group who has present imported oil prices. I don't think you rence with Canada. Each of us has a power something, who wants to produce any new would have to worry about it because the authority. We run it jointly. process or develop equipment or whatever or government would not continue. They would This power authority now being the only may be for solar energy would, if they can't sell, either sell the process or make it avail- one that could raise the money has already get the funds themselves, be eligible for as- able, whatever the procedure would be, built one atomic power plant. It is now going sistance in the way of a loan, a loan guar- whatever they did in the rubber research into a second atomic power plant. It has antee from this authority. type of thing. I think you would find then built the grid to connect it and the first I should mention also that conservation is a tremendous amount of capital. Capital thing you know we are going to see this included in here. In other words, support goes where it can get earnings. If capital can same thing happen that government is going for the conservation of energy if that can't find attractive earnings in producing energy to come in to meet the demands. I just think get its own financing because you can save in this country for self-sufficiency, they will if you believe in private enterprise, if you a lot of energy which would reduce the need invest in it. If they can't, they will invest believe in the capitalist system, you have to to produce it; and that that is part of this, in the McDonald Hamburger stands, not that stand up and see what does it take to help too, Pipelines are included in this as eligible I am against them. I am for them. that system work? You have got the very if they can't get the financing. (Laughter) But they are not going to solve simple and right answer. If government Alaska could produce an awful lot more our energy problem. We have a free capital would just get off their backs, then we oil if they opened up more lands; five, six, market. They go where the returns are. The wouldn't have any problem. But this is a seven million barrels a day. That would question is can the government help point democracy. Government is the creation of the take four or five pipelines. So you are talk- the way to good returns? people and it has got politicians like myself ing a lot of money and that has to be bal- QUESTION. Sir, you mentioned in connec- in it and they may not be always as totally anced out. tion with the nuclear power plants a con- objective in their views of what is needed Sir: tract between the Federal Government and because of these political pressures. There- QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, you had the State Public Service Commission. I don't fore, I think here is a possibility mentioned the government-owned, contract- think you will get many States that will If we can do what you say, perfect. They November 17, 1975 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD SENATE will try. But we talked about shortcutting of those, including Anitrust, and so forth some of the environmental requirements. If and 50 forth. So they finally had to give It up. you did that, the legislation would be killed. If there is a central group and you get Bo we have got to live within this, but let's some very able people who understand the have & central point where we can clear all law, the ecology, production, and so forth, I of this stuff and where you develop perhaps think this unit could become an extremely standard forms and 50 forth and to the degree efficient unit. we can get what you suggest, wonderful. I am not sure why in many cases these Then no money would be needed. things can't be standardized. Why do you Thank you. have to spend a great deal of money each Sir; way in the back? time you file an impact statement, start- QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, I am won- ing from scratch? The impacts can't be that dering about the effect of this plan on com- different. There are certain criteria that go petition within the LNG industry. For ex- into them. I have a feeling, I don't know, I ample, if one small project were to be given have & feeling this could be a very interest- substantial Federal help or one Alaska pipe- ing and useful step. line, what would the effect be on other appli- Thank you very much. I apologize for cants who didn't get help? having to go, but I go to open the Senate The VICE PRESIDENT. There is a very in- and I am not allowed to speak there. That teresting thought here and that is I think- is why perhaps I talk so long here. I can't don't hold me on this one-but I think it speak up there without unanimous consent, will be in the legislation that no loan would which I don't get very often. be made below the rates of what & prime pro- I would love to follow up. If any of you ducer of energy can get in the open market. have questions as time goes by on this, of In other words, the government won't come course, you get the legislation shortly, but in and take a weak company-this is not a I would be delighted to see them because to bailout. This is not going to be for the bail- me this has got to be the heart of our future ing out of a defunct company. This will only strength and vitality as a nation; our ability be to produce energy to achieve these goals. to meet our people's needs; to provide em- But the rate of the loan would not be lower ployment; to be secure and to meet our re- than what the prime rate would be for a sponsibilities around the world. successful company. I think we have got to get rolling as far Most companies will not want to borrow as this economy is concerned if we are go- from the government, I imagine, if they ing to stay the leader of the free world or if can get it from private. the free world is going to have 8 leader. Let Sir? me put it that way. QUESTION. What provision is made, Mr. Thank you very much, indeed. Vice President, in the event that loan is in default? MR. MEANY'S STATEMENT The VICE PRESIDENT. I think the plant, the On the basis of the analysis and recom- operation, whatever it is, would be completed mendations of the AFL-CIO Energy Policy and the property sold. They take a loss. If Committee, the AFL-CIO endorses the con- you are in this business of trying to produce cept of the Energy Independence Authority, risk or go into risk areas, you are going to a proposal initiated by Vice President Rocke- have some major successes and some failures. feller and introduced in the Congress by the I think that is why 25 percent of the capital Ford Administration. or 25 percent of the $100 billion will be equity Private industry, left to itself, cannot and and 75 percent loans. will not resolve the energy crisis which still I hope that they will make enough suc- plagues this nation. The American people cesses which they can sell at & profit to over- should not be deluded by the current easy come the losses which would be at & loss, you availability of energy supplies. While the gas know, where there would be a default. But lines have disappeared, the dependence of then they have just got to sell it. This is spe- the United States on oil from insecure foreign cifically stated not to become a government sources still exists. This nation is more operation. vulnerable to an Arab oil embargo today than Sir? in 1973. Government must provide the QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, please de- initiative and incentive for development of tail a little more of this clearing house con- energy projects that will place this nation cept. What authority would that have? Is it on the road to energy independence. advisory primarily? Is it in the ecology field It is estimated that capital in the amount only? Or could it spread to other areas of of $600 to $800 billion will be needed in the agencies? next ten years to finance investments for The VICE PRESIDENT. Any clearances that energy independence. Most projects would be would be by & division of FEA which would capitalized from private sources; however, specialize in government clearances, of all those deemed vital to the national interest types, and so if there is a project which con- but unable to secure private capital, would tributes towards energy self-sufficiency, fi- be financed through a new government cor- nanced or not financed, partially or not by poration with authority to make direct loans, the government, they would be eligible. to provide loan guarantees, and other financial have all of their clearances done through assistance to energy independence projects. this division. While the AFL-CIO does endorse the crea- This could very well lead to recommenda- tion of an Energy Independence Authority tions-I think it will be so stated in the leg-` and the basic program set forth in the islation-as to simplification of clearances. bill, we expect to have a number of proposals To me the most interesting case, a friend of for improvements in the specific terms of mine who is a lawyer in New York tried to set this measure. up a corporation for the seven utility com- At the proper time, we will testify before panies in New York State last year, which Congress on the legislation and will make would be a financing construction company. detailed proposals and suggestions to The credits weren't strong enough to do it strengthen the bill. themselves so they wanted to set up a joint The federation's Energy Policy Commit- company. tee-composed of Secretary-Treasury Lane He said there were, I have forgotten, 14, Kirkland, Vice Presidents Paul Hall, Martin 17 different regulatory bodies, State and na- Ward, William Sidell, A. F. Grospiron, Mur- tional, which were involved. He could not ray Finley and Joseph Keenan-will continue device & corporation which could meet all. its study of this and other proposals. Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 94th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 121 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1975 No. 171 November 17, 1975 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE 20185 Then as we got into the mid-60's OPEC had did was of course it really hit the coal indus- been formed and we became a net importer, try over the head so that our greatest re- didn't have the reserves to dominate world source was least developed and had more prices and therefore triggered by the conflict problems and while gas when it was first in the Middle East, the Arab countries finally controlled was a byproduct of oil and was moved and in two years raised prices 500 being burned and therefore was in surplus. percent. The price that was set was so low that as TOWARD ENERGY INDEPENDENCE people shifted to gas they were unable to get At that point, particularly the Eastern Sea- Mr. GRIFFIN. Mr. President, on Oc- the production, the increased production or board of this country suffered quite a set- tober 6, the Vice President addressed a even if they could get production-like in back because of the boycott and the price the case of Texas-they couldn't ship it on meeting of business executives here in increase. The boycott, let's face it, there were the interstate lines. Washington on the energy problems. I enough leaks and there were enough coun- Now as you know-we had a meeting in commend his remarks to my colleagues, tries that didn't join it so that it really this room, as a matter of fact, with a group and ask unanimous consent that the text wasn't as overwhelming as it might have of Governors who came in organized by Jim be printed in the RECORD following my been.- Rhodes of Ohio pointing out that they had I was at that point Governor of New York lost 600,000 man days of work last year due remarks. In addition, Mr. President, AFL-CIO deeply concerned; but Libya allowed oil to go to the shortages of gas and it was going to to one of the British Islands in the Carib- be a lot-that was a warm winter-worse next President George Meany has endorsed bean and be refined there and come into New year and his people, the industrial groups the concept of the administration's en- York for power and so forth which if they in his State were willing to finance produc- ergy proposal and I ask unanimous con- had really tightened down we would have tion of gas at higher prices if they could sent that his statement be printed in the been in a much more difficult situation. just get permission to move it on interstate RECORD. The President, as you all know, spent a pipelines and the concept of a common car- There being no objection; the material lot of time discussing the economics and hav- rier be adopted rather than a regulated price. was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, ing the summit meetings when he first took That has been very slow in coming because office last fall a year ago. One of the major the Federal Power Commission was afraid as follows: subjects was this question of energy. He that if they made such a ruling that they THE VICE PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS came out of those with a clear determination would be challenged in the courts by the I want to thank all of you very much for for energy independence as being essential ecologists and that they would then be over- coming here today and for giving me a chance for this country's national security; second, ruled. So they wanted legislation. to visit with you, try to outline first briefiy that this should be achieved by 1985. I only mention this because where gov- the conceptual thinking in back of this pro- He then worked out the details of legisla- ernment stepped in to regulate one phase of gram and then answer or at least discuss your tion which would encourage private enter- the energy industry it totally disrupted the questions. I will do my best to answer them. prise because energy has always been a pri- industry and shows very. clearly what can I think the legislation will go up this week. vate enterprise operation in this country ex- happen through government regulation. The The subject is a complicated one and there cept for Naval reserves, which would en- President, as you know, has fought regula- have been varying points of view as you all courage private enterprise to accelerate pro- tion and he has been for decontrol. He know by reading the press. Therefore, it has duction domestically. wanted an orderly decontrol on oil. He caused some difficulty in trying to get the I don't think we really have recognized wanted 39 months. But then we go back to thing worked out so that it could be put in quite as clearly as it seems to me the fact what has happened in Congress. He sent up detailed language for the legislation and the exists that this-because there is & great a 500 and some-page bill. deal of talk about the free market system- This bill was complicated and the public message. I hesitate to talk about the whole subject that the free market system should do this I don't think has really since the energy because I know everybody in this room is and that they should be the ones that with- crisis that they saw two years ago when totally familiar with the subject, but let me out Government intervention except through there were lines waiting for gasoline-has just for the record give you a brief outline a framework of laws which would give in- eased off. It was really sort of personified of the past and how it came about as to where centive. Allright. The framework of laws has never we are now. This country of course up to the 1960's was been achieved because one can speculate the major producer and exporter and had here-but first it is a complicated subject the reserves to export additional amounts if and it was complicated when-I have to necessary and so when on two or three occa- again go back a second. It was complicated sions other nations around the world tried when the United States Government con- FORS to raise the prices of oil substantially, we just trolled the price of interstate gas at a very exported more and were able to hold the low price 50 that the most desirable fuel turns out to be the cheapest fuel. What it price. GERALD 20186 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE November 17, 1975 at a meeting of the Midwestern Governors' $100 billion basis over ten years because that Or does one come to the conclusion reluc- where none other than Governor Exon asked 1s the life of the corporation, would prob- tantly or just as a suspicion even-not & con- me if there really was an energy crisis. He ably average out to about $10 billion a year. clusion-that there would be those in Con- said, "How can there be an energy crisis If this country moves towards self-suffici- gress in the opposition party who would just when there is plenty of oil and gas around?" ency it would take $60 billion to $80 billion as soon have the issue or would just as soon I said, "You have really expressed the whole a year and so $10 billion is 12, 14 percent of see us run short of energy, have the Presi- thing right there. There is plenty of oil and the total that is required. dent take off controls because they lapsed gas around because we are importing now What would the conditions be in determ- and not be able to work out an orderly ex- almost 40 percent of our consumption." ing how this money would be used? The con- tension and then have perhaps chaotic con- Domestic consumption is going down. So ditions are simply two basically: One, that ditions in 1976 and maybe this would be as long as we import it there isn't a crisis it contributes to the self-sufficiency; two, politically advantageous? in the sense that you are thinking of it, but that it would be used for financing through One hesitates to even think that anyone if the Middle East situation blew up again private enterprise just as the Military buys for political purposes would be willing to see or if for some other reason other than price its equipment through private enterprise the Nation run the risks which we are run- or through a boycott we could then find where those objectives, those investments ning and have the people suffer in a way that ourselves in the middle of a full-blown cri- cannot be obtained by private enterprise they might suffer very easily were such a sis which for certain parts of the country themselves; in other words, where they chaotic situation exist. But one can't elimi- would be total disaster. And I don't either can't get the money or for some rea- nate that possibility entirely. think anyone has really figured out how son are unwilling to; primarily can't get it, But whatever the situation is, there is no this country would survive a really effective can't get it because they can't earn. action. Therefore, we are in a stalemate. The boycott because we don't have transporta- If you take a look at the utility indus- problem is getting worse and we are up to tion from the west to the east to handle try-what, 70 percent of the atomic power now close to $30 billion with a 10 percent the movement of energy in sufficient quan- plants?-and of çóurse atomic power is the increase in foreign exchange imports. Luck- tities to keep our operations going; our so- great potential we have in this country for ily our farmers have been tremendously pro- clety going. energy. The others are important, but the ductive. So they are producing a major new We just have seen a 10 percent increase long-term, major producer of energy is source of foreign exchange. Other areas have take effect in the world oil prices and as I atomic for the time being; solar and thermal, been able to export. So our balance of pay- say Congress has not taken any effective out further. ments is reasonable at the moment, but with action; little pieces of action, but no com- I will come back to gas, coal and oil in a consumption going up, with production go- prehensive action. Finally, the management- minute. But let's say these 70 percent or 70 ing down, with the depletion allowance taken labor committee had some concepts as to percent of the atomic power plants that off, with the old oil still under control-it is how to encourage through incentive industry were planned were cancelled. There is a whole not under control at the moment but pos- to invest more domestically. very complicated series of reasons as to why. sibly under control-nobody can afford to That legislation hasn't gotten off the Local regulations of the State Public Serv- put the money into the secondary retrieval launching pad in Congress. ice Commissions where they can't get rate of oil because it falls under old oil. So as I view the situation we find ourselves increases so they can't earn enough money to So that we have the situation where as I in a free market industry, but the free mar- be able to borrow the money is one factor. say our production is declining and our con- ket has been a world market. Now national Also you can't get the increase you are on sumption is increasing and nobody thinks policy expressed by the President is that we line with your power. These atomic power there is a crisis. should be a self-sufficient, independent pro- plants, most efficient ones, cost about $1 bil- Let's go to the areas that the Energy In- ducer of energy. We have the resources. No- lion. Therefore, you would have $1 billion up dependence Authority might serve. The best body knows yet at what price. That is a na- not for four years as it used to be, but now illustration is rubber reserve under Bernie tional policy superseding a free market posi- with all of the filings that you have to make Baruch in World War II which did a heck of tion because the free market was an inter- on impact statements, the local suits, it is a.job. They contracted with six or seven pri- national one. Then a great many people up to between 10 and 11 years. So you have vate companies to develop synthetic rubber have felt that this OPEC price structure $1 billion tied up for 10 or 11 years with no production and of that group I think four would break down as production increased. basis for earning. That is one very good or five came through with processes or varia- Walter Levy who is one of the most so- reason. tions of & basic process which were success- phisticated people in the business and many Also uncertainties are another and all ful. They sold the company, the plants and of you know him, has said right along there kinds of regulations from Washington. The the process and we have a new industry in wasn't a chance; that they would do ex- labor-management recommendations were to the United States. It was a self-liquidating actly what they did do. He predicted that encourage and allow for a greater accumula- six or eight months ago, or even longer may- operation. tion of capital by corporations. This corporation, the concept of this be, that they would not decrease the price; Of course, the bill was immediately tagged they would not break the price; they would corporation is a self-liquidating corporation by the opposition as being just a special in- to finance those risks, which private enter- hold and they would increase the price. That terest bill for big business and big industry is what has happened. prise cannot or will not undertake at the and for capital rather than for the people So when people say that the use of Fed- present time to contribute to self-sufficiency which is an easy, cheap shot politically, but eral funds through a structure that is in and do it to the maximum degree possible- it isn't going to help the country. a sense comparable to the RFC conceptually, with private capital participation and So that bill hasn't gotten off. The real but not for ballouts, but for stimulating through private industry and then sell it as question has to be first how does govern- new industry or new production, and they rapidly as possible. ment when it has set a national policy. that say this is an allocation of capital and this Let me take three or four different areas. cuts across a free market operation work is going to take 1t from a whole lot of other First, we have ERDA. Some people say what with the industry in trying to work that out; things, the answer on the allocation of cap- do you need this for if you have ERDA? in this case domestic production? ital is very simple. The President has said ERDA's powers go to laboratory experiments our national policy is self-sufficiency by 1985. The first approach the President has was relating to energy. But they do not have the this very comprehensive legislation. funds or the authority to take those labora- The estimates vary between $600 billion One has to ask is it that the Congress go- tory experiments and take them out onto a and $800 billion will be required to achieve that object. That is out of about $4 trillion ing through this evolutionary change that full commercial production. Of course, here $300 billion that has been estimated as in- all of our establishment institutions have you move from a limited expense to a much larger expense. The commercial production dustry's capital requirements during this gone through is unable with such an over- is essential in order to find out what the cost ten-year period for meeting needs of the whelming majority by the opposition to the of energy would be. American people and our responsibilities in Executive Branch-in other words, the For instance, gasification of coal is being the world. Democratic Party as distinct from the Re- done and so its liquefaction of coal in South We will fall short of that as estimated- publican Party-is it unable to organize it- Africa. It comes out between $30 and $40 a again these are all estimates; therefore, they self and does the committee structure of 300 barrel equivalent energy. But it does produce are just guestimates-fall short by about different committees which the Congress has gas. It is essential. $600 billion. in both Houses, is it so cumbersome and does There are new methods that can come up So there is going to be a shortage. Nobody it involve so many committees when you that would take a little longer to go down knows how much money will come back into have a comprehensive piece of legislation of the line which might reduce it to $20 a barrel investments from Arab countries where the this kind, does this make it impossible for equivalent of óil or even down to $11, plus accumulation of capital is taken place. But the Congress to act effectively and rapidly in the fact that there is then the possibility I would imagine that Saudi Arabia alone is the national interest through jurisdictional of In-Situ, drilling a hole down in the deep up to about $7 billion now in investment disputes, et cetera, et cetera and within the coal mine, setting off an explosion, setting it in treasuries. These securities, were this cor- House the Caucus which is in conflict with on fire: the heat does the same thing under- poration to be passed by the Congress on the the committees? ground that is done on top and you would CONGRESSIONAL RECORD 20187 created by the burn- tion of shale, drill down, put off an explosion, catalyst to get or to help get us off dead set it on fire, draw off the gas, the gasified center in becoming self-sufficient as a nation are those who feel that this will be oil and recondense it. across the board in all of these fields on a a fur cheaper method but an experiment like The Livermore Laboratories have done self-liquidating basis, that this is essential that would cost $200 million to find out. some work on this with Edward Teller and for our national security, to our industrial A gasification plant, surface plant is about they feel, although nobody else is willing yet growth, to employment. That is a pretty good $1 billion. There is a need for 18 to 24 sur- to agree with them, that this might be pro- combination of the three. face gasification plants, traditional, known, duced at the rate of between the cost of $7 If we don't do it, in my opinion, there are proven style right now for the next-having and $8 a barrel. elements in this country and some of them to be built right now if we are going to meet If it were that, this would be one of the in the Congress who would like to see in- the gas supplies and this is what the gas in- great bonanzas that has happened to this dustry fail and not be able to meet the needs dustry is looking for. There right away 18 $18 country. It would be fantastic. of the country and then say, fine, we told billion to $24 billion to produce gas the most The Occidental company is the only com- you the system was no good; that capitalism expensive way. pany that I know that has done any major doesn't work; that private enterprise doesn't Some may have to be produced. Laws work in the field but-they can't afford this work. Therefore, we have got to take it over. change. We can get them changed so that kind of an experiment. Then we will move as the British moved gas can be purchased in another area, sur- plus gas and piped through the interstate Many of the companies bought I think taking over one industry after another and over $1 billion in leases out in Colorado for of course the problems that grow out of that; gas system. It is complicated. But that is shale, but they were going to do surface then they start subsidizing; then unlimited one area. mining. None of them have gone ahead be- capacity to pay and, therefore, you get into Coal, of course, gets tied up with the whole ecological problem. I visited out in Wyoming, cause of the uncertainties and the ecological the most difficult situation and the most Gillette, one of the most fascinating mines problems. that is another area. dangerous situation where you have neither where they took off 23 feet of surface, then Then you come down-I have covered the a capitalist system nor a socialist system and 70 feet of coal. clay underneath; they took coal, oil, gas; not covered Lt but mentioned you have the worst of both and nobody can the topsoil off first, stacked it; then took the them-to the question of electricity through make an investment because they don't know rest off. put it behind where they are digging atomic. what the conditions are going to be, what the the hole and then end up by putting the One of the standard methods of financing, regulations are going to be, what the re- topsoil back on, making six lakes, 6,000 acres. whether it is airplanes or a lot of other sources are going to be. Therefore, you have The only difference you will find is you will things in this country, is the lease purchase a plurality and we have higher unemploy- have lakes which you never had before. operation where somebody finances an air-, ment and demand for more expenditures by The growth will be as good if not better plane and the company purchases it. It is the Federal Government which the President and the only other difference is it will be 123 perfectly conceivable that an atomic power has had the courage to resist to a degree that feet lower than it was before. But I was plant costing 81 billion could be financed by is perfectly extraordinary and if he didn't, we there. The antelope were grazing still right the government under a contract with e. pri- would have more inflation. around where the mining operation was vate company for lease purchase with a con- This is then also I would say to you, those going on. This whole mine which produces tract with the Public Service Commission who study this question, that Fabian social- 20,000-I guess 20 million tons a year, has 55 that as and when it comes on line the rates ists like inflation because that is the quickest people. Everything is automated, the whole will be such that this company can earn way to equalize capital that you can in thing. It is a superb operation. In other whatever is necessary to pay back. any country. You don't have to expropriate words, it can be done. But they had to build The President in his message to the Con- anything. Just people's values are gone be- their own railroad to get it to the main line. gress in January said we need 200 atomic cause inflation just wipes them out and the They are servicing midwestern cities. If you power plants by 1985. We now have maybe 60. Germans went through that and we know want-let's say if as a nation we decide or The remaining ones, 70 percent were can- what happened from that. it proves to be feasible-to produce low- celled. California has the proposition next So I would just like to say that while this sulfur coal in the west and the ecological June banning all atomic power plants in Cali- has been opposed and we all know that be- problems are worked out and this whole fornia; and Oregon on Friday; they have got cause you all read it in the papers; because thing has got to be done 60 that we don't one of the same. it says it would be a first step towards gov- get our energy at the expense of our environ- If this country bans atomic power plants ernment takeover. ment. I am confident we can do both to- and we don't move in these other fields, we The President has already said we have to gether and the research can be done together. are going to be totally in a situation which have an allocation of capital. He has asked But then you come to the problem that a there are some ecologists who would like to private enterprise to do it. So it isn't a ques- lot of railroads can only move coal cars at the see a no-growth society. A no-growth society tion of taking the capital from housing and rate of ten miles an hour because of the con- means no jobs for the young people that are all of these other areas that people talk dition of the roadbeds. There is about $11 coming on because our whole society has been about. There is plenty of money right now billion of roadbed work to be done in this geared to increased employment based on in- in the savings and loan associations. People country. creased productivity. haven't got enough confidence to invest in It is also conceivable that this corporation I happen to think that that is the hallmark housing. So it isn't that. could loan, but I don't think the railroads of America. It 18 our strength. It is our suc- Secondly, as far as a step towards socialism, can borrow money. Therefore, they might buy cess and that we can do the ecological side of I think it is exactly the opposite. I think it preferred stock in a railroad to give them the this problem plus the development side. is government's showing their concern for funds or to invest the funds to fix up their You come to industry itself and energy. I the present system, free enterprise and capi- roadbeds which could then be earned out of don't know. There are close to 18 States that tal and that they are trying to help stimu- coal: all of this being contingent upon a are going to be in a serious condition-in- late and bridge over this period. conversion of eastern plants from oil to coal. dustries in 18 States-if they don't get gas There is one other thing I forgot to say If they do, they have got to have coal. The this winter. But here is how complicated this and then I will stop; that is, that the Federal coal has got to be produced. It has got to be gets. If we have a cold winter, even if the Energy Administration would have the re- transported so that you have got to have the interstate pipelines are allowed to be used, sponsibility of acting as the clearing house government in a position or somebody in a there is going to still be a shortage because for all of the ecological and regulatory func- position to be the catalyst, the fallback posi- there isn't enough gas being produced to tions that government has at State and Fed- tion where private enterprise cannot or will sell. eral levels, State, Federal and local levels. not finance the effort to achieve this That means that industry which depends So all of them would be cleared through independence. on gas and gas is a small percentage, whether this. They would then make recommenda- All of it then could be sold. No loans are it is textiles in South Carolina or glass in tions to simplify these structures based on made after; no commitments made after ten Pennsylvania or what not, they all need it, their experience. Any private operation which years. but it is a small percentage of their cost. was investing in capital to achieve energy Oil, we have got twice as much oil in shale So they would then go in and probably buy self-sufficiency could also use this corpora- as you all know in this country as the Arabs up propane because they could come in and tion as the clearing house for all of its con- have oil in the Middle East in known reserves. buy propane. But propane gas is what the tacts with government. The problem is to get it out. You can mine farmers depend on to dry their crops and to So that they could get a system which the shale. You can cook the oil out. Then you heat their homes and they are small buyers. would accelerate and maybe cut down on the end up with what I call talcum powder which They are not big buyers. So the next thing time because with a loss or time due to the is in a much larger volume than the shale you would have to have would be control of delays and the suits that take place. This is you have mined because it has been cooked propane and it is just going to take this gov- a very, very serious thing in terms of cost and 80 it is not dissolved. There is very little ernment one by one further and further into and expense. water where the shale is. Therefore, what do controls and the more government gets into I would also say the way the legislation is you do with the stuff? You could fill a valley controls in my opinion the more they distort being drafted it would give the board the but if you have a heavy wind, this stuff is the economy and make it difficult for us to discretion, a five-man board the discretion going to blow all over the west. get back on a sound basis. so that there wouldn't be a basis for suits. Again, you can do an experiment for $200 Therefore, in conclusion, it seems to me In other words, you couldn't sue the cor- million of trying to develop In-Situ produc- that this idea of the government acting as a poration for a decision because all of the key 20188 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE November 17, 1975 decisions are left to the judgment of the type of plant such as the rubber plants in willingly enter into such contracts, but if board. World War II. Is there any way you are going you do you could do that right now without Therefore, there aren't criteria and there- to insure that this legislation is so worded having to have the lease-back arrangement fore hopefully we can keep this from getting that someone of a different philosophical and the Federal Government build the another-I hope too many of you aren't outlook cannot turn this energy independ- plants. lawyers because I don't want to cut down ence agency into a Federal oil and gas cor- The VICE PRESIDENT. Great. Then we on the business-but hopefully we can get poration running the same way as TVA? wouldn't have to put any Federal money in. this thing so that we can get it rolling and The VICE PRESIDENT. It requires that every- QUESTION. I would think that would be get action fast and decisions made the way thing be sold and that it be self-liquidat- the place to look; is the Federal Government they are done in private enterprise as dis- ing and it be done through private enter- using its influence with the State commis- tinct from the way they are done too often prise and with private enterprise participa- sions to get the rates up? That will bring in government. tion. I think the private enterprise participa- the capital in and you won't have to build That I think is the summary. Any ques- tion is one of the most important. For in- the plants through the government. tions we can get into would develop details stance, if you build a power plant, atomic The VICE PRESIDENT. There is only one flaw of the situation, but that in essence is the power plant under lease purchase contract in your argument, if you will forgive me-at summary. with a contract with the Public Service Com- least a political flaw; and, that is, as one who I should say perhaps what makes me think mission, you actually then have a contrac- only two years ago left Governorship and who it will go through Congress. This is some- tual relationship so that the ownership, un- saw the beginning of the pressures due to, thing that labor wants very badly. It is jobs less somebody abrogates the contract, is in first, ecology on using non-sulphur fuels and through industry and not jobs through dole. the hands or will be in the hands of the the increased cost in getting the non-sulphur Therefore, I am pretty sure labor is going private enterprise. Nothing will be done coal, non-sulphur oil; then the embargo and to give it very strong support. If industry where the government sets up some new then the world price increase of 500 percent. at the same time feels it is desirable and form of TVA. These poor public service commissioners have worthwhile and gives it support, then I think It happens that the Governor of Pennsyl- had to take double and triple the cost of its passage has got very great. potential. vania who is a declared candidate for the electricity to consumers, if not more. If industry is opposed to it, that will nul- Presidency, Governor Schapp, has got a pro- Their problem is right now that they have lify labor support and probably nothing gram he has been trying to get-I don't know gone through so many increases-this is true would happen. But I think it is a turning whether it has surfaced yet-other Gover- because I was very close to the commission point for this country and if we don't have nors in the Eastern Seaboard to join in spon- there and when I got a new commissioner, energy we are not going to have growing In- soring which involves a TVA at the mine Chairman of the Commission, who had been dustry; if we don't have a growing industry, heads to produce electricity at the mine a strong consumer advocate, I said, "Look, we are not going to have jobs and we are heads which would be owned by the govern- in your advocacy of the protection of the going to have a lot of problems. We have ment, mined and then distributed from consumer do you include-this is before I got them, but they will be worse. there. offered him the job-the protection of the Thank you. So that I think-that we are on the verge. consumers' need for additional power in the Are there any questions? I flew to the coast Thursday night with a future? If so, do you visualize that that 18 QUESTION. Mr Vice President, could you Senator who has introduced a bill to break going to take higher rates and more money relate this program to the $6 billion syn- up the oil business and have just producers, in order to get the capital in?" He said, "I thetic fuel program that we read about re- distributors, marketers, each one would be read you. I agree with you and you have no cently? Is it part of it? in a separate company. I only mention that. problem." I took him on. The VICE PRESIDENT. The $6 billion syn- This is a Republican and it shows that people He did a superb job. He was pilloried by thetic fuel program is one that Senator Jack- are looking in Congress for ways-or politi- the public. He was sued by my own attorney son has proposed. It hasn't passed yet. So cal in political life-of being responsive to general. (Laughter) It was purely political. I what we did in the thinking on this was to the public but not, in my opinion, too clear love him, too, and he was sued by the city. just make a provision that they would be as to what the impact would be on our In other words, these people have been in complimentary if that passes. In other words, system. the most difficult political situations because of course, that is an outright expenditure. Sir: every consumer of electricity-I can only In other words, that is government putting QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, you indi- speak for New York, but I suppose it is very the money in the budget expenditure. This cated that this authority would be able to similar in other parts-has just gone through other one is a loan or an investment or a produce hopefully about 14 percent, I believe the most unbelievable increases in cost. guarantee of a loan and on a self-liquidat- you said, of the energy needed? So my reason for thinking what I say is ing basis. So that is the difference. But if The VICE PRESIDENT. Capital. they would be so glad to see something built that one passes, fine. Whatever they do that QUESTION. Of the capital. that will protect the needs of the community wouldn't have to be done here. The VICE PRESIDENT. Of the capital needed but doesn't have to raise the rates until fur- So that they will be totally complimentary. to meet the self-sufficiency. ther down the road when they may not even QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, you men- QUESTION. Is there some way this could be be on the commission. (Laughter) They tioned many of the traditional sources of helpful if private industry does not come would be very happy, in my opinion-this is energy but you hardly touched on solar forth with the other 86? Do you think there a political judgment-to sign a contract for energy. I wonder. Here is one that has few is any problem in that other 86 being raised the future whereas they could not go through ecological problems and would it be partic- during that period of time? another major increase now particularly as ipating in this program and how? The VICE PRESIDENT. Let's take a case in the people aren't going to get the benefit for The VICE PRESIDENT. Again, solar energy point. Let's say they invested $200 million 11 years. The alternative to this is, what is and thermal energy are very important parts. in either an In-Situ gasification of coal or happening again in New York State where They are not large scale producers of energy In-Situ gasification of oil project and it we had an authority which was created to immediately, but they are very important proved to be within let's say lower cost of develop hydro-electric power on the St. Law- parts of the program. Any group who has present imported oil prices. I don't think you rence with Canada. Each of us has a power something, who wants to produce any new would have to worry about it because the authority. We run it jointly. process or develop equipment or whatever or government would not continue. They would This power authority now being the only may be for solar energy would, if they can't sell, either sell the process or make it avail- one that could raise the money has already get the funds themselves, be eligible for as- able, whatever the procedure would be, built one atomic power plant. It is now going sistance in the way of a loan, a loan guar- whatever they did in the rubber research into a second atomic power plant. It has antee from this authority. type of thing. I think you would find then built the grid to connect it and the first I should mention also that conservation 16 a tremendous amount of capital. Capital thing you know we are going to see this included in here. In other words, support goes where it can get earriings. If capital can same thing happen that government is going for the conservation of energy if that can't find attractive earnings in producing energy to come in to meet the demands. I just think get its own financing because you can save in this country for self-sufficiency, they will if you believe in private enterprise, if you a lot of energy which would reduce the need invest in it. If they can't, they will invest believe in the capitalist system, you have to to produce it; and that that is part of this, in the McDonald Hamburger stands, not that stand up and see what does it take to help too, Pipelines are included in this as eligible I am against them. I am for them. that system work? You have got the very if they can't get the financing. (Laughter) But they are not going to solve simple and right answer. If government Alaska could produce an awful lot more our energy problem. We have a free capital would just get off their backs, then we oil if they opened up more lands; five, six, market. They go where the returns are. The wouldn't have any problem. But this is a seven million barrels a day. That would question is can the government help point democracy. Government is the creation of the take four or five pipelines. So you are talk- the way to good returns? people and it has got politicians like myself ing a lot of money and that has to be bal- QUESTION. Sir, you mentioned in connec- in it and they may not be always as totally anced out. tion with the nuclear power plants a con- objective in their views of what is needed Sir: tract between the Federal Government and because of these political pressures. There- QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, you had the State Public Service Commission. I don't fore, I think here is a possibility mentioned the government-owned, contract- think you will get many States that will If we can do what you say, perfect. They November 17, 1975 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE will try. But we talked about shortcutting of those, including Anitrust, and so forth some of the environmental requirements. If and so forth. So they finally had to give It up. you did that, the legislation would be killed. If there is a central group and you get So we have got to live within this, but let's some very able people who understand the have a central point where we can clear all law, the ecology, production, and so forth, I of this stuff and where you develop perhaps think this unit could become an extremely standard forms and so forth and to the degree efficient unit. we can get what you suggest, wonderful. I am not sure why in many cases these Then no money would be needed. things can't be standardized. Why do you Thank you. have to spend a great deal of money each Sir; way in the back? time you file an impact statement, start- QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, I am won- ing from scratch? The impacts can't be that dering about the effect of this plan on com- different. There are certain criteria that go petition within the LNG industry. For ex- into them. I have a feeling, I don't know, I ample, if one small project were to be given have a feeling this could be a very interest- substantial Federal help or one Alaska pipe- ing and useful step. line, what would the effect be on other appli- Thank you very much. I apologize for cants who didn't get help? having to go, but I go to open the Senate The VICE PRESIDENT. There is a very in- and I am not allowed to speak there. That teresting thought here and that is I think- is why perhaps I talk so long here. I can't don't hold me on this one-but I think it speak up there without unanimous consent, will be in the legislation that no loan would which I don't get very often. be made below the rates of what a prime pro- I would love to follow up. If any of you ducer of energy can get in the open market. have questions as time goes by on this, of In other words, the government won't come course, you get the legislation shortly. but in and take a weak company-this is not a I would be delighted to see them because to bailout. This is not going to be for the bail- me this has got to be the heart of our future ing out of a defunct company. This will only strength and vitality as a nation: our ability be to produce energy to achieve these goals. to meet our people's needs; to provide em- But the rate of the loan would not be lower ployment; to be secure and to meet our re- than what the prime rate would be for a sponsibilities around the world. successful company. I think we have got to get rolling as far Most companies will not want to borrow as this economy is concerned if we are go- from the government, I imagine, if they ing to stay the leader of the free world or if can get it from private. the free world is going to have & leader. Let Sir? me put it that way. QUESTION. What provision is made, Mr. Thank you very much, indeed. Vice President, in the event that loan is in default? MR. MEANY'S STATEMENT The VICE PRESIDENT. I think the plant, the On the basis of the analysis and recom- operation, whatever it is, would be completed mendations of the AFL-CIO Energy Policy and the property sold. They take a loss. If Committee, the AFL-CIO endorses the con- you are in this business of trying to produce cept of the Energy Independence Authority, risk or go into risk areas, you are going to a proposal initiated by Vice President Rocke- have some major successes and some failures. feller and introduced in the Congress by the I think that is why 25 percent of the capital Ford Administration. or 25 percent of the $100 billion will be equity Private industry, left to itself, cannot and and 75 percent loans. will not resolve the energy crisis which still I hope that they will make enough suc- plagues this nation. The American people cesses which they can sell at a profit to over- should not be deluded by the current easy come the losses which would be at & loss, you availability of energy supplies. While the gas know, where there would be a default. But lines have disappeared, the dependence of then they have just got to sell it. This is spe- the United States on oil from Insecure foreign cifically stated not to become a government sources still exists. This nation is more operation. vulnerable to an Arab oil embargo today than Sir? in 1973. Government must provide the QUESTION. Mr. Vice President, please de- initiative and incentive for development of tall a little more of this clearing house con- energy projects that will place this nation cept. What authority would that have? Is it on the road to energy independence. advisory primarily? Is it in the ecology field It is estimated that capital in the amount only? Or could it spread to other areas of of $600 to $800 billion will be needed in the agencies? next ten years to finance investments for The VICE PRESIDENT. Any clearances that energy independence. Most projects would be would be by & division of FEA which would capitalized from private sources; however, specialize in government clearances, of all those deemed vital to the national interest types, and so if there is a project which con- but unable to secure private capital, would tributes towards energy self-sufficiency, fl- be financed through a new government cor- nanced or not financed, partially or not by poration with authority to make direct loans, the government, they would be eligible, to provide loan guarantees, and other financial have all of their clearances done through assistance to energy independence projects. this division. While the AFL-CIO does endorse the crea- This could very well lead to recommenda- tion of an Energy Independence Authority tions—I think it will be so stated in the leg- and the basic program set forth in the islation-as to simplification of clearances. bill, we expect to have a number of proposals To me the most interesting case, a friend of for improvements in the specific terms of mine who is a lawyer in New York tried to set this measure. up a corporation for the seven utility com- At the proper time, we will testify before panies in New York State last year, which Congress on the legislation and will make would be a financing construction company. detailed proposals and suggestions to The credits weren't strong enough to do it strengthen the bill. themselves so they wanted to set up a joint The federation's Energy Policy Commit- company. tee-composed. of Secretary-Treasury Lane He said there were, I have forgotten, 14, Kirkland, Vice Presidents Paul Hall, Martin 17 different regulatory bodies, State and na- Ward, William Sidell, A. F. Grospiron, Mur- tional, which were involved. He could not ray Finley and Joseph Keenan-will continue device a corporation which could meet all. its study of this and other proposals.