Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
4525643
label
Annual Republican Lincoln Day Dinner, Butler, PA, February 9, 1950
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
4525643
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
Annual Republican Lincoln Day Dinner, Butler, PA, February 9, 1950
citationUrl
collections
Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers
Speeches
subjects
Republican National Committee (U.S.)
Labor Management Relations Act, 1947
iiifBase
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
4525643
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1950-02-28
month
2
year
1950
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1950-02-01
month
2
year
1950
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
url
mediaId
8b9e9bac5f8c43bf
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box D13, folder "Annual Republican Lincoln Day
Dinner, Butler, PA, February 9, 1950" of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary
and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Copyright Notice
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of
photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United
States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.
Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public
domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to
remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid
copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Digitized from Box D13 of The Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library
SPEECH TO BE GIVEN FEBRUARY 9, 1950 AT THE ANNUAL
REPUBLICAN LINCOLN DAY DINNER AT BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA
Mr. Chairman, honored and distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen -
Being with you this evening on this occasion is a real privilege.
I would be remiss in my responsibilities if no mention at this time
were made of my good friend and yours, Congressman Louis E. Graham. As
a new member of the Congress I have had, as do all of us freshmen, a
difficult time and little opportunity to know and thoroughly appreciate
all of my colleagues. Circumstances, principally the question of time,
limit your sound appraisal of only the best in the House. I can truth-
fully and honestly state, and without equivocation, that Louie Graham
is one of the soundest and most mature members of the House of Representa-
tives. You should be proud of his record as we are proud to number him
among our colleagues on the Republican side of the aisle. My comments
are not based on long standing friendships or personal affection but
rather on a critical analysis and appraisal of the work I have seen done
on the floor of the House.
FORD & LIBRARY GERALD
-2-
In the months following one of the blackest Tuesdays in the history of
this country, namely November 2, 1948, it was my subconscious feeling
that the United States was on the brink of disaster with little or no
hope of recovery. It seemed to me that people of our nation had lost
a golden opportunity on November 2nd to snatch from the hands of selfish
minority groups the controls of our Government. Through indifference and
a failure to undertake our responsibilities as citizens, we fumbled the ball
on that infamous day.
In the days, weeks and months following November 2nd our feelings enshrouded
our conscience. We knew as citizens and as members of a great political
party that we had been remiss in our responsibilities. The shock of
defeat was such a blow many thought no recovery was possible. This attitude
was understandable if not desirable.
The long, uphill road and battle began in the Congress early in 1949.
Through near historic efforts, I believe, Republican members of the Congress
averted further disaster. We licked in practically every instance the
"handout state" programs of the Administration. This struggle which
SERAL was FORD LISKAGE
-3-
carried on on your behalf became infectious, and in recent months a
new spirit among Republicans has permeated our nation. In addition, and
this is most important, this new attitude has seemingly taken hold of
the imagination of that great group of citizens who consider themselves
independent voters.
A year ago Republican rallies and dinners were performa performances. We
went through the moutine with little hope for future successes. Today
I am glad to report to you that Republican gatherings are attended by
citizens of all walks of life, of all ages, who believe they have a mission
and a crusade.
Let me give you several examples. On January 21st, in the City of Detroit,
the largest and most enthusiastic GOP dinner and get together was held in
the history of the Party in the State of Michigan. We did not delve on our
dismal past performances, but rather spoke of our future achievements.
I can assure you that every Republican from the State of Michigan who
attended that meeting, and even those who were turned away for lack of
facilities, and there were many, believe that our mission can be accomplished
in the crucial months ahead.
-4-
On Monday night, February 6th, the Republican women of the District of
Columbia put on the most successful political rally in the annals of the
nation's capital, the cost of the function a mere $2.20, that including a
grass roots dinner, excellent speeches by our leaders, and an evening of
good entertainment. It might be mentioned that we who attended, and there
were over 10,000 in the arena, paid our Federal tax in order to participate
in this stirring event. In passing, I might mention that our Democratic
friends, who are having their annual Jackson-Jefferson Day Dinner with
a tariff of $100 per plate, are not assuming their share of the tax burden.
For some unknown reason, probably best known by the Administration, the
20% tax on the Administration's party is not being paid.
I would like to give you still another example of a reborn enthusiasm. In
my home town, Grand Rapids, Michigan, we are having the largest Republican
Lincoln Day Dinner in the history of the community. A year ago at our
Lincoln Day Dinner we had difficulty in corralling 350 for the occasion.
In 1950, 2 weeks in advance of the Dinner, 1600 dinner tickets have been
sold and it is estimated that 2,000 or more citizens will attend the speech
making as the guests of the Committee.
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
-5-
Needless to say, I am certain that you who are here this evening have a
similar attitude as best illustrated by the enthusiasm and determination
that I see among you.
As a young man, I am one of those who became of voting age after the New
Deal came into power, and as a result have had no opportunity to point to
the White House and say "A Republican who believes in our American way of life
now occupies the highest and most respected office in the world." All of my
contemporaries are in the same category and as a result have never had the
opportunity to appraise the difference between sound administration and
maladministration. Because there has been no opportunity to contrast good
and evil, it has taken a longer time than normally would be necessary for the
younger generation to see that our future success depends upon a change in
authority in the White House and in the Congress.
It is now becoming apparent, however, that some of our leaders in the younger
generations are realizing and appraising the gravity of the situation. In-
stead of being sold a false bill of goods by the Administration's propagandists
we are presently seeing a rebirth of young GOPism on our college campuses
and in our communities. In the Middle West, for example, a determined group
-6-
of young Republcans have taken the time and effort to present a thoughtful
platform entitled "The Opportunity State". At the same time, and working
independently, another group of young Republicans in New York State has prepared
what they call "A Blueprint for a Better America". I submit to you that these
two young groups, and there may be many more with which I am not acquainted,
have started a grass roots movement to rekindle the fires in the hearts and
minds of our young people. I recommend most highly that you aid and abet
any and all new movements of this sort for both the Party and the nation need
such help. Frankly and in all sincerity, some of the most constructive
and concrete thinking I have seen among Republicans has been evidenced by
the work of the young GOPers in New York and on the campus in Ann Arbor,
Michigan. No one here tonight probably agrees in toto with every provision
in the Michigan platform or the New York blueprint, but under no circumstances
should we destroy their initiative by being disdainful of their determination
to present a real platform to those of their own generation.
Our real purpose in gathering here this evening is to pay tribute to one
of the greatest Americans in our nation's history. At the same time it is
highly appropos for us to draw lines of distinction between the political
FORD & LIBRARY CERALE
-7-
philosophies of the Party founded by Abraham Lincoln and the present
Democratic administration. I have entitled my speech "The Present
Democratic Administration - a Menace", and I feel that if Abraham Lincoln
were here with us during these tumultuous and confusing times his attitude
toward those now in authority in Washington would be identical with ours.
Abraham Lincoln believed in the preservation of the Union and the fundamental
American way of life. Today we are faced with an equally grave crisis and
unless all of us are willing to contribute of our time and means, the nation
that Lincoln preserved will inevitably tumble over the precipice toward
statism.
So much has been written about this great leader of the American people,
Abraham Lincoln, that today he stands as one of the symbols of real
Americanism. What made Abraham Lincoln a legend? What did he accomplish
to deserve such a niche in our history? Why is he treated with such great
reverence by all of our people?
You are all familiar with Abraham Lincoln's righks rise from the back woods
of Kentucky to the office of President of the United States. He was a man
of kindness, simplicity, intelligence, statesmanship, integrity, and deep
FORD LIBRARY CERT
-8-
religious conviction. Unfortunately some of his recent successors in
that high office have lacked to a surprising degree a number of these
necessary and desirable characteristics. I condemn no man for any individual
failings, but I feel it is tragic for the American people and the world at
large, and in these critical times, that our President cannot be above
backroom political trading and lacking in essential qualities for true
leadership.
Today more than ever before we need to survey Lincoln's life to evaluate what
he said and what he did. As the first President eleeted by the Republican
Party, Lincoln gives us the answer or answers to the trouble that is presently
raging in this country as to whether or not we should preserve the American
concept or way of life in favor of a new philosophy, term it what you will.
Some call the present Administration's program socialistic. Others define
it differently. Regardless of the definition, it must be admitted that
the Administration does not believe in or stand for principles that have
guided our people to the pinnacle in the short span of 174 years.
In reality there can be no compromise. The Republican Party does not nec-
essarily disagree with some of the Democrats in the goals we seek to achieve.
FORD LIBRARY 07130 39
-9-
The basic difference is in the means by which a better standard of living
may be obtained for all of us. This difference is reflected in the completely
dissimilar political and social philosophies prevailing within each Party.
The choice between these two philosophies lies with the American people. It is
an alternative between self-help and the handout.
The leaders of the present Democratic Party pursue relentlessly their policy
of unlimited Federal spending for the purpose of appeasing pressure groups
which command large blocks of votes. The Administration's program is not
one of prudently conceived assistance to the individual in need but is rather
a program of creating a reliance upon Government from the cradle to the grave.
The inevitable result has been the slow but never-ending destruction of
self-reliance and individual incentive. By demagoguing appeals to the some-
thing-for-nothing instinct, the Democrats in the past have and will in the
future endeavor to obtain widespread support of their program. We in the
Republican Party firmly believe that the American people are self-reliant
and independence-loving citizens and that they, if the facts were known
to them, would resent being classified as the objects of permanent charity.
Most Americans prefer to rely primarily upon their own industry, ability
GLRATE and FORD LIBRARY
-10-
decision to provide not only the necessities but also the luxuries of life
rather than to rely upon the uncertain benevolence of government.
Abraham Lincoln believed then as he would now in the Republican point of
view. He is quoted as having said: "The legitimate object of government
is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done, but
cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves, in their separate
and individual capacities. In all that the people can do individually, do
as well for themselves, Government ought not to interfere." Republicans
are constantly reminded by unthinking people that all segments of our
society are now better off economically speaking than they were in the days
before the present Administration. I ask you, is that a true statement?
Statisticians can show that we may be slightly more prosperous, but if the end
result is complete loss of individual opportunity, is temporary economic
success worth the cost?
Many citizens rightfully ask the question, What has happened to the American
people that they should allow the United States to reach a point to which
we may never return. We have gradually traveled the path of regimentation
and government control in a piecemeal but nevertheless unchanging course.
-11-
I could recount for you some of the legislation that has been enacted during
the past 18 years that would prove my point. I think it best, however, to
call to your attention some of the proposals that lie ahead for in them
the real danger is most evident. The answer to the success or failure of
the Republican Party depends upon our making aware to the American people
the specific faults and failings of our Democratic friends.
A sound analysis of the Administration's basic legislative program would
convince you that it is not in accord with the concepts of Abraham Lincoln.
Mr. Lincoln at one time made the following statement - "You cannot bring
about prosperity by discouraging threats, you cannot strengthen the weak
by weaking the strong, you cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the
wage payer, you cannot establish sound security on borrowed money, you cannot
keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn." These terse but true
statements are the complete antithesis of the present philosophy prevalent
in the Administration. I believe the Republican point of view on all issues
coincides with that expressed by Mr. Lincoln and is in contrast to the policies
of the Democrats.
We Republicans have been accused of "Me-tooism". I deplore the use of
GERIA the term FORD LIBRART
-12-
for a number of reasons, but principally because it does not define our
Party's program. On February 6,1950, the Republican Party issued a Statement
of Principles and Objectives. The 1950 Statement coincides with the ideals
so often expressed by Abraham Lincoln.
For example, on the issue of foreign affairs our Party advocates a bi-
1
partisan approach with full consideration and recognition to the legislative
2
branch of our government. We are opposed to secret commitments such as those
3
entered into at Yalta. We vehemently and vigorously believe in stopping the
I
spread of Communism. Our Party does favor an extension and expansion of
world trade, but we question the soundness or the advisability of such a
pinl Cicape printing
program where it will imperil the living standards of our own people. The
United States should not allow the flooding of our markets with goods pro-
duced by cheap labor to the inevitable detriment of our national security
and the economic status of our individual workers.
In recent weeks it has been vividly called to our attention that former
a
responsible officials in our State Department have been guilty of treasonous
conduct. Furthermore our present Secretary of State, well knowing that a
CHO1 i LIBRARY GERALD
fair and equitable trial had been granted to Alger Hiss, refused to admit or
acknowledge
-13-
&
friend
the reprehensible conduct of a former associate Loyalty and compassion
are commendable personal qualities but Mr. Acheson's words pertaining to
Mr. Hiss do little credit to a man occupying such a high official position.
Secretary Acheson has impaired his usefulness as a governmental official
been convicted of perjury and by indirection convicted of
by his comments concerning the activities of a man who has betrayed, his
1
country. Treason is not a pardonable offense in the eyes of the American
people. Unless the Secretary has the desire to retract his comments
on his attitude toward Mr. Hiss, Mr. Acheson should resign.
On domestic matters the issue is clearly drawn between us and our Democratic
opponents. In our new Statement of Policy there is a statement demanding
a balanced budget and a general reduction of our mounting tax burden. It
is indeed a shame on the American people that at a time of relative prosperity
this nation is faced with pending bankruptcy. Canada, our neighbor to the
north, has led the way and made a phenomenal record in reducing taxes and
balancing the budget. To the contrary, the present Administration's record
is one of increased taxes, increased annual deficits, and mounting national
indebtedness.
The Republican Party in its Statement of Policy stands four-square with
the agricultural programs of the National Grange and the American Farm Bureau.
-14-
We condemn the Brannan plan which aims at nationalizing agriculture.
The program set forth in the GOP Policy Statement advocates a fair
price for the farmer's products at the market place by a system of price
supports only when the need is apparent and with emphasis on the funda-
mental concepts of free enterprise.
I imagine the farmers in this county and this area are similar in many
respects to those in my own district. We have a strong Grange and a strong
Farm Bureau. Our farmers in Michigan are not selfish predatory citizens
who disregard the legitimate point of view of the urban consumers and the
welfare of our national economy. Our farmers and those of you in this
suh
district who live in rural areas want above all else a fair share of our
national income without entire reliance on government subsidies, and above
all else deplore the trend toward regimentation of our agriculture.
We in the Republican Party need have no apology for the basic philosophy
LABOR
in most of the provisions in the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947,
better known as the Taft-Hartley Act. Our new Policy Statement stands
four-square for the Taft-Hartley approach in contrast to the Administration's
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
inequitable Wagner Act. No one denies that the Taft-Hartley Act can be
-15-
amended to eliminate certain inequities. I can assure you that a sincere
attempt was made by the Members of the Congress in our Party during the
last session to amend the Taft-Hartley Act where proven inequalities existed.
Members of the Democratic Party with an alleged fiendish allegiance to
the Wagner Act refused to cooperate in any honest effort to change the
existing law. Furthermore, despite the statement in the Democratic platform
that the Democrats would repeal the Taft-Hartley Act and substitute in its
stead the Wagner Act, when the vote on such a motion was made in the House
only 37 Democrats so voted. This is but another example of broken platform
pledges, for Mr. Truman and his followers repeatedly promised that if given
the leadership in this country in 1949 and 1950 they would destroy the Taft-
Hartley Act.
The Republican Party, as did Mr. Lincoln long ago, realizes the government's
obligation to those who are in need. In our 1948 Party platform and again in
the recent Party Statement, we indicated our approval of a sound and fair
Social curity
program of security of our older citizens. It would be most unwise to embark
upon changes in our Social Security Program without the full benefit of
SERALD FORD
horough study. We favor expanded coverage and increased benefits, but we
-16-
deplore the financial unsoundness of the program as it now exists.
No one denies that this country has room for improvement in expanding
our nation's health. The Democratic Administration says this problem must
be attacked and solved by the President's prepaid compulsory health insurance
program. The Administration is anxious and willing to embark upon a dupli-
cation of the socialized medicine program inaugurated by the labor socialist
government in England. We in the Republican Party admit the need of
improvement but deny most emphatically the necessity of adopting that experi-
ment which has so miserably failed in Great Britain. We can and will meet
the challenge with the help of all interested segments of our people. The
doctors, the dentists, and the various technicians in the field of health
are making a strenuous and determined effort to cooperate with those in
public office so that the American people will be given the finest medical
care and attention without resorting to governmental red tape and regimentation.
The Federal Government can and should assist the various states and communi-
ties so that expanded medical care will be available to those unable to
afford voluntary health insurance. In addition, an all-out effort should
be made to expand and strengthen voluntary nonprofit health insurance programs.
-17-
One might go on indefinitely, but rather than take further time I would
like to set forth what I consider to be the goal of our Party, the promise
we should make to our people, the threat that will engulf us if affirmative
action is not taken in our position generally. For your information and
guidance I submit the following:
Our goal at home - An opportunity society that offers each individual a maximum
chance for achievement, wellbeing, and security.
Our goal abroad - A world at peace working out the common problems of mankind
through effective international organization in a spirit of mutual trust and
cooperation and with an increasing regard for the dignity of every man.
Our Promise - At home - Increasing economic prosperity with a renewed faith
in moral values. New energy sources, new products and new production
techniques can greatly improve the material well-being of each citizen in
our time. But the pursuit of material wealth must be accompanied by a
renewal of spiritual and moral values on the part of the individual, the
family and the nation.
Our Promise Abroad - A community of free nations living at peace. The free
FORD & LIBRARY GREALO
exchange of goods and ideas among nations affords the best hope for maintaining
the peace and raising the standard of living in all countries.
-18 -
The Threat at home - Gradual surrender of individual freedom. In our
country, the danger to our democratic way of life lies chiefly in our adopting
schemes for attaining economic security which compel or result in the surrender
of individual freedom.
The Threat Abroad - Breakdown in international relations. Failure of the
United States to develop a sound affirmative foreign policy to meet the threat
of Soviet imperialism and the revival of Fascism, and to assume its
responsibilities of world leadership, may lead to a breakdown in international
relations resulting in economic or military warfare between nations.
Our position is that the present Administration is neither realizing the promise
nor warding off the threat. Instead, it is creating a hand-out state which
slowly destroys individual initiative and enterprise, limits the right of
the individual to make personal decisions, and compels a surrender of individual
decision and action to a bureaucratic central government.
Our own position can be summed up in two main principles: "individual freedom
with security" at home and "international responsibility" abroad.
TIME + NONEY-an investment in gontant SERAL
LIBRARY
SPEECH TO BE GIVEN FEBRUARY 9, 1950 AT THE ANNUAL
REPUBLICAN LINCOLN DAY DINNER AT BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA
Mr. Chairman, honored and distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen -
Being with you this evening on this occasion is a real privilege.
I would be remiss in my responsibilities if no mention at this time
were made of my good friend and yours, Congressman Louis E. Graham. As
a new member of the Congress I have had, as do all of us freshmen, a
difficult time and little opportunity to know and thoroughly appreciate
all of my colleagues. Circumstances, principally the question of time,
limit your sound appraisal of only the best in the House. I can truth-
fully and honestly state, and without equivecation, that Louie Graham
is one of the soundest and most mature members of the House of Representa-
tives. You should be proud of his record as we are proud to number him
among our colleagues on the Republican side of the aisle. My comments
are not based on long standing friendships or personal affection but
rather on a critical analysis and appraisal of the work I have seen done
on the floor of the House.
FORD & LIBRARY GERALD
-2-
In the months following one of the blackest Tuesdays in the history of
this country, namely November 2, 1948, it was my subconscious feeling
that the United States was on the brink of disaster with little or no
hope of recovery. It seemed to me that people of our nation had lost
a golden opportunity on November 2nd to snatch from the hands of selfish
minority groups the controls of our Government. Through indifference and
a failure to undertake our responsibilities as citizens, we fumbled the ball
on that infamous day.
In the days, weeks and months following November 2nd our feelings enshrouded
our conscience. We knew as citizens and as members of a great political
party that we had been remiss in our responsibilities. The shock of
defeat was such a blow many thought no recovery was possible. This attitude
was understandable if not desirable.
The long, uphill road and battle began in the Congress early in 1949.
Through near historic efforts, I believe, Republican members of the Congress
averted further disaster. We licked in practically every instance the
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
handout state" programs of the Administration. This struggle which was
-3-
carried on on your behalf became infectious, and in recent months a
new spirit among Republicans has permeated our nation. In addition, and
this is most important, this new attitude has seemingly taken hold of
the imagination of that great group of citizens who consider themselves
independent voters.
A year ago Republican rallies and dinners were performa performances. We
went through the routine with little hope for future successes. Today
I am glad to report to you that Republican gatherings are attended by
citizens of all walks of life, of all ages, who believe they have a mission
and a crusade.
Let me give you several examples. On January 21st, in the City of Detroit,
the largest and most enthusiastic GOP dinner and get together was held in
the history of the Party in the State of Michigan. We did not delve on our
dismal past performances, but rather spoke of our future achievements.
I can assure you that every Republican from the State of Michigan who
attended that meeting, and even those who were turned away for lack of
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
facilities, and there were many, believe that our mission can be accomplished
in the crucial months ahead.
On Monday night, February 6th, the Republican women of the District of
Columbia put on the mest successful political rally in the annals of the
nation's capital, the cost of the function a mere $2.20, that including a
grass roots dinner, excellent speeches by our leaders, and an evening of
good entertainment. It might be mentioned that we who attended, and there
were over 10,000 in the arena, paid our Federal tax in order to participate
in this stirring event. In passing, I might mention that our Democratic
friends, who are having their annual Jackson-Jefferson Day Dinner with
a tariff of $100 per plate, are not assuming their share of the tax burden.
For some unknown reason, probably best known by the Administration, the
20% tax on the Administration's party is not being paid.
I would like to give you still another example of a reborn enthusiasm. In
my home town, Grand Rapids, Michigan, we are having the largest Republican
Lincoln Day Dinner in the history of the community. A year ago at our
Lincoln Day Dinner we had difficulty in corralling 350 for the occasion.
In 1950, 2 weeks in advance of the Dinner, 1600 dinner tickets have been
FORD sold and it is estimated that 2,000 or more citizens will attend the speech
1 GERALD LIBRATY ?
smking as the guests of the Committee.
-5-
Needless to say, I am certain that you who are here this evening have a
similar attitude as best illustrated by the enthusiasm and determination
that I see among you.
As a young man, I am one of those who became of voting age after the New
Deal came into power, and as a result have had no opportunity to point to
the hite House and say "A Republican who believes in our American way of life
now occupies the highest and most respected office in the world. All of my
contemporaries are in the same category and as a result have never had the
opportunity to appraise the difference between sound administration and
maladministration. Because there has been no opportunity to contrast good
and evil, it has taken a longer time than normally would be necessary for the
younger generation to see that our future success depends upon a change in
authority in the White House and in the Congress.
It is now becoming apparent, however, that some of our leaders in the younger
generations are realising and appraising the gravity of the situation. In-
stead of being sold a false bill of goods by the Administration's propagandists
FORDIO are presently seeing a rebirth of young GOPism on our college campuses
& LIBRA GERALD 1
in our communities. In the Middle West, for example, a determined group
-6-
of young Republeans have taken the time and effort to present a thoughtful
platform entitled "The Opportunity State". At the same time, and working
independently, another group of young Republicans in New York State has prepared
what they call "A Blueprint for a Better America". I submit to you that these
two young groups, and there may be many more with which I am not acquainted,
have started a grass roots movement to rekindle the fires in the hearts and
minds of our young people. I recommend most highly that you aid and abot
any and all new movements of this sort for both the Party and the nation need
such help. Frankly and in all sincerity, some of the most constructive
and concrete thinking I have seen among Republicans has been evidenced by
the work of the young GOPers in New York and on the campus in Ann Arber,
Michigan. No one here tonight probably agrees in toto with every provision
in the Michigan platform or the New York blueprint, but under no circumstances
should we destroy their initiative by being disdainful of their determination
to present a real platform to those of their own generation.
Our real purpose in gathering here this evening is to pay tribute to one
of the greatest Americans in our nation's history. At the same time it is
GERALD LIBRARY P. FORD
Highly appropes for us to draw lines of distinction between the political
-7-
philosophies of the Party founded by Abraham Lincoln and the present
Democratic administration. I have entitled my speech "The Present
Democratic Administration - a Menace", and I feel that if Abraham Lineoln
were here with us during these tumultuous and confusing times his attitude
toward those now in authority in Washington would be identical with ours.
Abraham Lincoln believed in the preservation of the Union and the fundamental
American way of life. Today we are faced with an equally grave erisis and
unless all of us are willing to contribute of our time and means, the nation
that Lincoln preserved will inevitably tumble over the presipiee toward
statism.
So much has been written about this great leader of the American people,
Abraham Linecln, that today he stands as one of the symbols of real
Americanism. What made Abraham Lineoln a legend? What did he accomplish
to deserve such a niche in our history? Why is he treated with such great
reverence by all of our people?
You are all familiar with Abraham Lincoln's xkgkka rise from the back woods
of Kentucky to the office of President of the United States. He was a men
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
of kindness, simplicity, intelligence, statemenship, integrity, and deep
&
religious conviction. Unfortunately some of his recent successors in
that high office have lacked to a surprising degree a number of these
necessary and desirable characteristics. I condemn no man for any individual
failings, but I feel it is tragic for the American people and the world at
large, and in these critical times, that our President cannot be above
backroom political trading and lacking in essential qualities for true
leadership.
Today more than ever before we need to survey Lincoln's life to evaluate what
he said and what he did. As the first President eleeted by the Republican
Party, Lineoln gives us the answer or answers to the trouble that is presently
raging in this country as to whether or not we should preserve the American
concept or way of life in favor of a new philosophy, term it what you will.
Some call the present Administration's program socialistic. Others define
it differently. Regardless of the definition, it must be admitted that
the Administration does not believe in or stand for principles that have
guided cur people to the pinnaele in the short span of 174 years.
In reality there can be no compromise. The Republican Party does not nec-
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
desarily disagree with some of the Democrats in the goals we seek to achieve.
-9-
The basic difference is in the means by which a better standard of living
may be obtained for all of us. This difference is reflected in the completely
dissimilar political and social philosophies prevailing within each Party.
The choice between these two philosophies lies with the American people. It is
an alternative between self-help and the handout.
The leaders of the present Democratic Party pursue relentlessly their policy
of unlimited Federal spending for the purpose of appeasing pressure groups
which command large blocks of votes. The Administration's program is not
one of prudently conceived assistance to the individual in need but is rather
a program of creating a reliance upon Government from the cradle to the grave.
The inevitable result has been the slow but never-ending destruction of
self-reliance and individual incentive. By demagoguing appeals to the some-
thing-fer-nothing instinct, the Democrats in the past have and will in the
future endeavor to obtain widespread support of their program. We in the
Republican Party firaly believe that the American people are self-reliant
and independenco-loving citizens and that they, if the facts were known
to them, would resent being classified as the objects of permanent charity.
GERALO R. FORD Meet ARI
Americans prefer to rely primarily upon their own industry, ability and
-9-
The basic difference is in the means by which a better standard of living
may be obtained for all of us. This difference is reflected in the completely
dissimilar political and social philosophies prevailing within each Party.
The choice between these two philosophies lies with the American people. It is
an alternative between self-help and the handout.
The leaders of the present Democratic Party pursue relentlessly their policy
of unlimited Federal spending for the purpose of appeasing pressure groups
which command large blocks of votes. The Administration's program is not
one of prudently conceived assistance to the individual in need but is rather
a program of creating a reliance upon Government from the cradle to the grave.
The inevitable result has been the slow but never-ending destruction of
self-relience and individual incentive. By demagoguing appeals to the some-
thing-for-nothing instinct, the Democrate in the past have and will in the
future endeavor to obtain widespread support of their program. We in the
Republican Party firmly believe that the American people are self-reliant
and independenco-loving citizens and that they, if the facts were known
to them, would resent being classified as the objects of permanent charity.
GERALD R. FORD
Most Americans prefer to rely primarily upon their own industry, ability and
-10-
decision to provide not only the necessities but also the luxuries of life
rather than to rely upon the uncertain benevolence of government.
Abraham Lincoln believed then as he would now in the Republican point of
view. He is quoted as having said: "The legitimate object of government
is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done, but
cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves, in their separate
and individual capacities. In all that the people can do individually do
as well for themselves, Government ought not to interfere." Republicans
are constantly reminded by unthinking people that all segments of our
society are now better off economically speaking than they were in the days
before the present Administration. I ask you, is that a true statement?
Statisticians can show that we may be alightly more prosperous, but if the end
result is complete loss of individual opportunity, is temperary economic
success worth the cost?
Many citizens rightfully ask the question, What has happened to the American
people that they should allow the United States to reach a point to which
i
FORD are may never return. We have gradually traveled the path of regimentation
GERALD
LIBRARY
and government control in a piecemeal but nevertheless unchanging course.
-10-
decision to provide not only the necessities but also the luxuries of life
rather than to rely upon the uncertain benevolence of government.
Abraham Lincoln believed then as he would now in the Republican point of
view. He is quoted as having said: "The legitimate object of government
is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done, but
cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves, in their separate
and individual capacities. In all that the people can do individually do
as well for themselves, Government ought not to interfere." Republicans
are constantly reminded by unthinking people that all segments of our
society are now better off economically speaking than they were in the days
before the present Administration. I ask you, is that a true statement?
Statisticians can show that we may be alightly more prosperous, but if the end
result is complete loss of individual opportunity, is temperary economic
success worth the cost?
Many citizens rightfully ask the question, What has happened to the American
people that they should allow the United States to reach a point to which
FORD we may never return. We have gradually traveled the path of regimentation
i LIBRARY GERALD
and government control in a piecemeal but nevertheless unchanging course.
-11-
I could recount for you some of the legislation that has been enacted during
the past 18 years that would prove my point. I think it best, however, to
call to your attention some of the proposals that lie ahead for in them
the real danger is most evident. The answer to the success or failure of
the Republican Party depends upon our making aware to the American people
the specific faults and failings of our Democratic friends.
A sound analysis of the Administration's basic legislative program would
convince you that it 1s not in accord with the concepts of Abraham Lincoln.
Mr. Lincoln at one time made the following statement - "You cannot bring
about prosperity by discouraging threats, you cannot strengthen the week
by weaking the strong, you cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the
wage payer, you cannot establish sound security on borrowed money, you cannot
keep out of trouble by spending more then you earn." These terse but true
statements are the complete antithesis of the present philosophy prevalent
in the Administration. I believe the Republican point of view on all issues
coincides with that expressed by Mr. Lincoln and is in contrast to the policies
of the Democrate.
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
We Republicans have been secused of "Me-tooism". I deplore the use of the term
-12-
for a number of reasons, but principally because it does not define our
Party's program. On February 6,1950, the Republican Party issued a Statement
of Principles and Objectives. The 1950 Statement coincides with the ideals
so often expressed by Abrahem Lincoln.
For example, on the issue of foreign affairs our Party advocates a bi-
partisan approach with full consideration and recognition to the legislative
branch of our government. We are opposed to secret commitments such as those
entered into at Yalta. We vehemently and vigorously believe in stopping the
spread of Communism. Our Party does favor an extension and expansion of
world trade, but we question the soundness or the advisability of such a
program where it will imperil the living standards of our own people. The
United States should not allow the flooding of our markets with goods pro-
duced by cheap labor to the inevitable detriment of our national security
and the economic status of our individual workers.
In recent weeks it has been vividly called to our attention that seemingly
responsible officials in our State Department have been guilty of treascnous
conduct. Furthermore our present Secretary of State, well knowing that a
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
fair and equitable trial had been granted to Alger Hiss, refused to admit
-13-
the reprehensible conduct of a former associate. Leyalty and compassion
are commendable personal qualities but Mr. Acheson's words pertaining to
Mr. Hiss do little credit to a man occupying such a high official position.
Secretary Acheson has impaired his usefulness as a governmentak official
by his comments conserning the activities of a man who has betrayed his
country. Treason is not a pardonable offense in the eyes of the American
people. Unless the Secretary has the desire to retract his comments
on his attitude toward Mr. Hiss, Mr. Acheson should resign.
On domestic matters the issue is clearly drawn between us and our Democratic
opponents. In our new Statement of Policy there is a statement demanding
a balanced budget and a general reduction of our mounting tax burden. It
is indeed a shamp on the American people that at a time of relative propperity
this nation is faced with pending bankruptey. Canada, our neighbor to the
north, has led the way and made a phenomenal record in reducing taxes and
balancing the budget. To the contrary, the present Administration's record
is one of increased taxes, increased annual deficits, and mounting national
indebtedness.
FORD
i
GERALD
LIBRARY
the Republican Party in its Statement of Policy stands four-square with
the agricultural programs of the National Grange and the American Farm Bureau.
-14-
We condemn the Brannan plan which aims at nationalising agriculture.
The program set forth in the GOP Policy Statement advosates a fair
price for the farmer's products at the market place by a system of price
supports only when the need is apparent and with emphasis on the funda-
mental concepts of free enterprise.
I imagine the farmers in this county and this area are similar in many
respects to those in my own district. We have a strong Grange and a strong
Farm Bureau. Our farmers in Michigan are not selfish predatory eitizens
who disregard the legitimate point of view of the urban consumers and the
welfare of our national economy. Our farmers and those of you in this
district who live in rural areas want above all else a fair share of our
national income without entire reliance on government subsidies, and above
all else deplore the trend toward regimentation of our agriculture.
We in the Republican Party need have no apology for the basic philosophy
in most of the provisions in the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947,
better known as the Taft-Hartley ACt. Our new Policy Statement stands
four-square for the Taft-Hartley approach in contrant to the Administration's
FORD is LIBRARY GERALD
inequitable Wagner Act. No one denies that the Taft-Hartley Ast can be
-15-
amended to eliminate certain inequities. I can assure you that a sincere
attempt was made by the Members of the Congress in our Party during the
last session to amend the Taft-Hartley Act where proven inequalities existed.
Members of the Democratic Party with an alleged fiendish allegiance to
the Wagner Act refused to cooperate in any honest effort to change the
existing law. Purthermore, despite the statement in the Democratic platform
that the Democrate would repeal the Taft-Hartley Act and substitute in its
stead the Wagner 1st, when the vote on such a motion was made in the House
only 37 Democrats so voted. This is but another example of broken platform
pledges, for Mr. Truman and his followers repeatedly promised that if given
the leadership in this country in 1949 and 1950 they would destroy the Taft-
Hartley Act.
The Republicsn Party, as did Mr. Lincoln long ago, realizes the government's
obligation to those who are in need. In our 1948 Party platform and again in
the resent Party Statement, we indicated our approval of a sound and fair
program of security of our older eitisens. It would be most unvise to embark
upon changes in our Social Security Program without the full benefit of
FORD & LIBRARY GERALD
thorough study. We favor expended coverage and increased benefits, but we
-16-
deplore the financial unsoundness of the program as it now exists.
No one denies that this country has room for improvement in expanding
our nation's health. The Democratic Administration says this problem must
be attacked and solved by the President's prepaid compulsory health insurance
program. The Administration is anxious and willing to embark upon a dupli-
cation of the socialized medicine program inaugurated by the labor socialist
government in England. We in the Republican Party admit the need of
improvement but deny most emphatically the necessity of adopting that experi-
ment which has so miserably failed in Great Britain. We can and will meet
the challenge with the help of all interested segments of our people. The
doctors, the dentists, and the various technicians in the field of health
are making a strenuous and determined effort to cooperate with those in
public office so that the American people will be given the finest medical
care and attention without resorting to governmental red tape and regimentation.
The Federal Government can and should assist the various states and communi-
ties so that expanded medical care will be available to those unable to
FORD & LIBRARY GERALD
afford voluntary health insurance. In addition, an all-out effort should
be made to expand and strengthen voluntary nonprofit health insurance programs.
-16-
deplore the financial unsoundmess of the program as it now exists.
No one denies that this country has room for improvement in expanding
our nation's health. The Democratic Administration says this problem must
be attacked and solved by the President's prepaid compulsory health insurance
program. The Administration is anxious and willing to embark upon a dupli-
cation of the socialized medicine program inaugurated by the labor socialist
government in England. We in the Republisan Party admit the need of
improvement but deny most emphatieslly the necessity of adopting that experi-
ment which has so miserably failed in Great Britain. We can and will meet
the challenge with the help of all interested segments of our people. The
doctors, the dentists, and the various technicians in the field of health
are making a strenuous and determined effort to cooperate with those in
public office 80 that the American people will be given the finest medical
care and attention without reserting to governmental red tape and regimentation.
The Federal Government can and should assist the various states and communi-
ties so that expanded medical care will be available to those unable to
FORD i LIBRARY GERALD
afford voluntary health insurance. In addition, an all-out effort should
be made to expand and strengthen voluntary nonprofit health insurance programs.
-17-
One might go on indefinitely, but rather than take further time I would
like to set forth what I consider to be the goal of our Party, the promise
we should make to our people, the threat that will engulf us if affirmative
action is not taken in our position generally. For your information and
guidance I submit the following:
Our goal at home - An opportunity society that offers each individual a maximum
chance for achievement, wellbeing, and security.
Our goal abroad - - A world at peace working out the common problems of mankind
through effective international organization in a spirit of mutual trust and
cooperation and with an increasing regard for the dignity of every man.
Our Promise - At home. - Increasing economic prosperity with a renewed faith
in moral values. New energy sources, new products and new production
techniques can greatly improve the material well-being of each citizen in
our time. But the pursuit of material wealth must be accompanied by a
renewal of spiritual and moral values on the part of the individual, the
family and the nation.
Our Promise Abroad - A community of free nations living at peace. The free
GERALO FORD LIBRARY
exchange of goods and ideas among nations affords the best hope for maintaining
the peace and raising the standard of living in all countries.
-18 -
The Threat at home - Gradual surrender of individual freedom. In our
country, the danger to our democratic way of life lies chiefly in our adopting
schemes for attaining economic security which compel or result in the surrender
of individual freedom.
The Threat Abroad - Breakdown in international relations. Failure of the
United States to develop a sound affirmative foreign policy to meet the threat
of Soviet imperialism and the revival of Fascism, and to assume its
responsibilities of world leadership, may lead to a breakdown in international
relations resulting in economic or military warfare between nations.
Our position is that the present Administration is neither realizing the premise
nor warding off the threat. Instead, it is creating a hand-out state which
slowly destroys individual initiative and enterprise, limits the right of
the individual to make personal decisions, and compels a surrender of individual
desision and action to a buresueratic central government.
Our own position can be summed up in two main principles: "individual freedom
with security" at home and "international responsibility" abroad.
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
-18 -
The Threat at home - Gradual surrender of individual freedom. In our
country, the danger to our democratic way of life lies chiefly in our adopting
schemes for attaining economic security which compel or result in the surrender
of individual freedom.
The Threat Abroad - Breakdown in international relations. Failure of the
United States to develop a sound affirmative foreign policy to meet the threat
of Soviet imperialism and the revival of Fascism, and to assume its
responsibilities of world leadership, may lead to a breakdown in international
relations resulting in economic or military warfare between nations.
Our position is that the present Administration is neither realizing the premise
nor warding off the threat. Instead, it is creating a hand-out state which
slowly destroys individual initiative and enterprise, limits the right of
the individual to make personal decisions, and compels a surrender of individual
desision and action to a buresueratic central government.
Our own position can be summed up in two main principles: "individual freedom
with security" at home and "international responsibility" abroad.
GERALD FORD LIBRARY