Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
4526518
label
Fifth District Weekly Radio Reports, April-June 1965
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
4526518
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
Fifth District Weekly Radio Reports, April-June 1965
citationUrl
collections
Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers
Weekly Radio Reports
subjects
Korea (South)
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Budget deficits
Disasters
Economics
Executive-Legislative relations
Housing
Industrial relations
Inflation (Finance)
Legislation
Military pay
Political reform
Poverty programs
Soldiers
Suffrage
Taxation
Vietnam War, 1961-1975
Presidential assassinations
iiifBase
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
4526518
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1965-06-30
month
6
year
1965
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1965-04-01
month
4
year
1965
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
url
mediaId
74dc7b0c86a27149
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box D35, folder "Fifth District Weekly Radio
Reports, April-June 1965" of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech
File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Copyright Notice
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of
photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United
States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.
Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public
domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to
remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid
copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Digitized from Box D35 of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library
RADIO SCRIPT FOR 5th DISTRICT STATIONS
April 28, 1965
41 minutes FOR TAPING APRIL 28
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford speaking with you from the
Nation's Capitol where thousands of visitors are enjoying springtime
in Washington.
-
This is my first talk with you by radio since the 89th Congress convened and
since I became Minority Leader. The leadership position has meant leaving the
Committee on Appropriations where I served for 14 years; it has meant moving from
the Old House Office Building to the Minority Leader's suite in the Capitel. Building.
But it has not meant any reduction in service to the citizens of the 5th District.
In fact I trust all of you will feel free to contact me at any time with any matter
concerning the federal government. I solicit your views and recommendations on
national and international policy.
Before discussing some of the highlights of this 89th Congress, I
Kenh addinia Countre
first thank the radio stations of West Michigan for broadcasting this
message as a public service.
With my new job has come more responsibilities, among them the
necessity to travel mainly on weekends making speeches and meeting
with American citizens.
Being on the road means being away from Betty my wife and children on
much of the time
weekends. However, I believe it is part of my duty and new responsibilities
to visit many states and cities forseveral reasons.
Mainly, I've been stressing two major angers that threaten the
foundations of our "emocracy.
Speaking in a non-partisan way, I believe the dangers are the present
imbalance of power in the legislative and executive branches,
and
FORD
LIBRARY
the possibility that our strong two-party system could become a thing of the
past.
-more-
Radio S cript April 28, 1965
page 2
When either political party controls Congress by a crushing 2 to 1
majority, the traditional system of checks and balances which is designed
,
to protect the public interest is endangered.
The present Congress is a good example of imbalance with the same
party that has an overwhelming majority in the House and Senate controlling
the White House.
TO conect this situation,
I urge more citizens to become part of what the late Supreme Court
Justice Felix Frankfurter described as an informed, civically militant
electorate. I encourage you to become knowledgable on all sides of
leading issues and with all political personalities.
While we may not agree among ourselves as to our own choice of
should
political parties and candidates, we thoroughly agree that men and women
who actively work for a party and candidates of their choice are better
citizens.
Earlier I described the present Congress as too far out of balance.
The record since this session began in January points up the proof
Some observers have compared the work of the Congress so far with
the House and Senate
in 1933 when Franklin D. "oosevelt was president.
In a sense, this may be true. We have passed more legislation so far this
session than during an comparable period I canrecall. However, qualityk
quantity is not the same as quality. Nor do new laws guarantee remedies for
old or new problems.
It seems to me that a Congress of better balance would have adopted
LIBRARY
better legislation at a slower, more deliberate pace.
-more-
radio tape April 28
page 3
It has been said by critics that Congress frequently makes haste
slowly. However, the act of deliberate slowness is a safeguard against
racing to the brink of decision. It prevents a dangerous plunge. Congress
should reach its decisions only after adequate research, thought
and exhaustive discussion.
I have enjoyed talking with you. Next week I intend will be to
back with another report firm the Nation's capatal.
discuss the foreign policy of the United States, paricularly as
applies in Southeast Asias
Thank you for your testening
at tention. This is your Congressman Jerry Ford
reporting from Washington.
I find the Committee's Radio-TV Scripts (please check one or more
os applicable):
( ) Useful BE text material for broadcasts to my District stations.
( ) Useful as background material for broadcasts, newsletters,
speeches, etc.
( ) Of little use to me.
() Please continue sending me the scripts each week.
( ) Please take my name off your distribution list.
Other comment:
Member
Room Number
4c
THIS SIDE OF CARD IS FOR ADDRESS
U.S.POSTAGE
Public Relations Office
Republican Congressional Committee
312 Congressional Hotel
Washington 3, D.C.
RADIO-TELEVISION
Jone Mudy.
MEMO
save use later may
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
312 CONGRESSION WASHINGTON 3,D.C
⑉
LINCOLN 4-3010
Script No. 18
May 3, 1965
THE CLEAN ELECTIONS AMENDMENT
Note to GOP Members: To determine whether these weekly scripts are useful
to you, would you please take a moment to fili out the attached postcard and
return to the Committee? Please do so whether or not you use the scripts.
Thanks.
This is Congressman
reporting to you from Washington.
I recently discussed with you the way in which legislation is pushed through the Congress --
often with little public discussion and no debate. What has happened on Capitol Hill, in short,
is that the big Democratic majorities in the Senate and House have effectively stymied many sound
Republican proposals or simply killed off amendments to bills on White House orders. Don't debate
it, in other words, just pass it. That's the order of the day.
But I am somewhat heartened by recent developments on the voting rights bill which is now
being considered by Congress. Here, at least, is one proposal where we may have some success
in producing better legislation.
Last week, the Senate accepted an amendment to the voting rights bill by Senator John J.
Williams, Delaware Republican, which would help to make certain that all citizens are not only
eligible to vote -- but that their votes are counted. Republican members of the House are pressing
for a similar addition to the House version of the voting rights bill.
The voting rights bill, as you know, is supposed to guarantee equal opportunity for all
Americans to register and vote. But, as it is presently proposed, it fails to take care of the many
illegal ways there of canceling out legal ballots. There have been too many cases of so-called
"tombstone" voting in our country's history, where the names of persons long dead are registered
and votes are cast for them. There have been too many instances where the same person voted
under several aliases, and so forth. And every illegal vote cast for a candidate cancels out a
legal vote for his opponent.
The proposed Republican amendment would make it a Federal offense to vote or register
illegally. It would set up possible fines of $10,000 or imprisonment for five years, or both, for
giving false information when registering to vote, for voting illegally, or for buying votes.
DERALD R.FORD LIBRARY
- more -
- 2 -
This amendment is not aimed atonyone part of the country. It is not almed of the South or
the North or the East or the West. It is aimed at an abuse that everyone knows exists - on abuse
that is liable to crop up in any part of the country - and has,
Specifically, let's not forget Cook County, Illinois.
The Chicago Tribune, in an editorial which appeared last fall, made this statement:
"Election fraud is not occasional or accidental in Chicago. It is a way of life." That observation
by the Tribune is certainly borne out by what happened in the 1960 Presidential election in Chicago
In one precinct - where the voting list showed only 22 qualified voters 82 votes were cast.
The proposed Republican amendment is an attempt to put an end to this disgraceful condition
-- not only in Chicago, but elsewhere.
Out of the ballot box is supposed to come the voice of the people. It is supposed to come
clear and strong and undiluted. It is not supposed to be warped and drowned out by the static of
illegal voting. It is not supposed to be augmented by eerie voices from the grave or by a single
voice multiplied many times.
It is well to remember, too, that dictatorships are often built and sustained on rigged
elections. The illegal voter is, in fact, more than a criminal, he is a traitor to our democratic
society.
I am hopeful the Democratic majority will accept the clean elections amendment we are
now trying to include in the voting rights bill. I believe it is vital that we do.
This is Congressman
reporting from Washington.
(A copy of this script is available on Teleprompter in the House TV Studio.)
###
RADIO SCRIPT FOR 5th DISTRICT STATIONS
May 4, 1965
41 minutes FOR TAPING MAY 5, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford speaking with you from the
when we are again deeply concerned with on
Nation's Capitol at a time 1 of international crisis. development,
The events in the Dominican Republic the past few days are matters of
deg significance
sencerny not only here in the capital but in the society of free
nations everywhere.
When the President ordered American combat troops into action in
the Dominican "epublic he asked leaders of both political parties to
meet with him in the White House for consultation.
During the two hours we were there, I told the stated President that the
overwhleming majority of Republicans in Congress stand solidly behind The President's
declared purpose of preventing the establishment of another Communist
regime in the Americas.
By his timely action in meeting the threat to life, property and
hemispheric security which is posed by disruptive forces in the Dominican
Republic, the President has avoided a repetition of the debacle
of indecision at the Bay of Pigs.
All evidence indicates that had the President hesitated to act, the
results would have been tragic in terms of human life and the long-range
security of the Western "emisphere. If the Dominican "epublic were to go
the way of Castro's Cuba, the Caribbean itself would become a Communist-held
lake.
-more-
GERALDA LISRAR FORD
5th District radio script May 5, 1965
page 2
Although a majority of Republicans in Congress and I as House
Minority Leader support the President®s firm and decisive action in
and our national security
defense of American life and property it seems to me that other
actions are necessary.
First I endorse the President's request to have Congress supplement
the military budget at this crucial time. The financial proposal he
submitted to the Homae and Senate in January is inadequate under the
present circumstances.
I emphasize that I am not being critical. It must be explained
that the proposed budget Mr. Johnson submitted to Congress/came January at
time before the United States was involved in conflict in two hemispheres.
I also am in favor of the United States giving strict attention
to the real cause of the current trouble in Latin America- that cause
is on the island of Cuba just 90 miles from our shore.
It is no secret that Communist infiltrators have been trained
in
Fidel Castro's Cuba, almost within sight of our country.
Latin America, in fact the Western Hemisphere, will face Communism's
alsoted
dangerous threats until the arsonist Castro is eradicated. He the
fire starter in the Dominican Republic.
Unless the United States proves to Castro that we mean business, that
Western
we have the power and the strength as The leader of the Hemisphere nations,
we
that 1 intend to block the export of Communist trouble-makers and war-mongers
unless me da This my FORD
from Castro's bastion to other parts of the world, there will be more
GERALD
LIBRAR
countries churned and divided with turmoil and strife. -move-
5th District radio tape May 5, 1965
page 3
I suggest that President Johnson carry out the original four-point
attack against Communism which John F. Kennedy demanded.
During in the 1960 presidential campaign and at the time of the Cuban
missile crisis, the late President insisted on: inspection of missile sites
in Cuba removal of all Soviet forces from Castro's spawning ground for
Communism
support of free Cuban forces both inside and outside of that
country and blocking the export of Communism from the strategic island.
These are dangerous and trying days. Although there must al ways be
a place for responsible dissent perhaps mainly on dempestic issues
when the national security interest is at stake, I believe partisanship should end.
Our Nation has successfully met the challenge of aggression in the
past with courage, resourcefulness and unity. I have high hopes we will
continue to do the same at this significant point in history. thank you
for listening. this is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting from Washington.
GERALD FORD LIBRAR,
RADIO SCRIPT FOR 5th DISTRICT STATIONS
May 4, 1965
41 minutes FOR TAPING MAY 5, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford speaking with you from the
Nation's Capitol at a time of international crisis.
The events in the Dominican Republic the past few days are matters of
grave concern, not only here in the capital but in the society of free
nations everywhere.
When the President ordered American combat troops into action in
the Dominican Republic he asked leaders of both political parties to
meet with him in the White House for consultation.
During the two hours we were there, I told the President that the
overwhleming majority of Republicans in Congress stand solidly behind his
declared purpose of preventing the establishment of another Communist
regime in the Americas.
By his timely action in meeting the threat off life, property and
hemispheric security which is posed by disruptive forces in the Dominican
Republic, the President has avoided a repetition of the debacle
of indecision at the Bay of Pigs.
All evidence indicates that had the President hesitated to act, the
results would have been tragic in terms of human life and the long-range
security of the Western "emisphere. If the Dominican Republic were to go
the way of Castro's Cuba, the Caribbean itself would become a Communist-held
lake.
"more-
QERMLD FORD VIBRARY
5th District radio script May 5, 1965
page 2
Although a majority of Republicans in Congress and I as House
Minority Leader support the President8s firm and decisive action in
defense of American life and property, it seems to me that other
actions are necessary.
First-==I have publicly asked that the President immediately come
to Congress for a supplement to the military budget.mizer The financial
proposal he submitted to the House and Senate in January is inadequate
under the present circumstances.
I emphasise that I am not being critical. It must be explained
that the proposed budget Mr. Johnson submitted to Congress came at a
time before the United States was involved in conflict in two hemispheres.
I also am in favor of the United States giving strict attention
to the real cause of the current trouble in Latin America--that cause
is on the island of Cuba just 90 miles from our shore.
It is no secret that Communist infiltrators have been trained
in
Fidel Castro's Cuba, almost within sight of our country.
Latin America, in fact the Western Hemisphere, will face Communism's
dangerous threats until the arsonist Castro is eradicated. He is the
fire-starter in the Dominican Republic.
Unless the United States proves to Castro that we mean business, that
Western
we have the power and the strength as a leader of the Hemisphere natior
that intend to block the export of Communist trouble-makers and war-mongers
from Castro's bastion to other parts of the world, there will be more
GERALD
LIBRARY
countries churned and divided with turned? and skelfa
-mou-
5th District radio tape May 5. 1965
page 3
I suggest that President Johnson carry out the original four-point
attack against Communism which John F. Kennedy demanded.
During tx the 1960 presidential campaign and at the time of the Cuban
missile crisis, the late President insisted one inspection of missile sites
in Cubs----renoval of all Soviet forces from Castro's spawning ground for
Communism support of free Cuban forces both inside and outside of that
country-==and blocking the expert of Communism from the strategic island.
These are dangerous and trying days. Although there must al.ways be
a place for responsible dissent---perhaps mainly on demoestic issues---
when the national interest is at stake, I believe partisanship should end.
Our Nation has successfully net the challenge of aggression in the
past with courage, resourcefulness and unity. I have high hopes we will
continue to do the same at this significant point in history.
#
#
#
GE8RLD FORD VIBRARY
Fifth District Radio tape
to be taped May 12, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington
with some timely information on the vital issue of adequate warnings in
the event of tornadoes.
In the wake of the tragic storms that struck Palm Sunday causing
loss of life, injuries and property damage in the Fifth District area
of Michigan and elsewhere in six I asked the United States
Weather Bureau here in Washington for a detailed report.
Robert M. White, Chief of the United States Weather Bureau, has
given me a 64-page report prepared by an investigating team of the
Department of Commerce.
After inspecting damage in Michigan and elsemhere,
talking with local weather bureaus, civil defense and police agencies,
survivors and eye-witnesses, the tornado inspection team makes several
recommendations.
The team recommends in its words better community planning for
weather emergencies, the use of positive alerting devices, distribution to
the public of more information on tornadoes, and a strengthening of
severe weather reporting networks at the community level.
It is regretable that the lack of a radarscope in Grand Rapids was the
cause of a delay in the local weather bureau giving radio and television
stations so-called "authorized" tornadoe warnings
the twisters
struck.
GERALDA LIBRARY
-more-
radio tape May 12, 1965
Blaming the absence of a radarscope, a member of the investigating
team claimed that the tornado warning message to radio and television
stations was delayed 8 minutes after the twisters rampaged through the
area.
However, I emphasize that Mr. White found--in his words=="nothing
wrong" with the way the Grand Rapids weather bureau handled the
difficult severe storm situation.
The investigating team concluded that the death toll would have been
much higher had it not been for the excellent cooperation of broadcast
media in relaying severe weather warnings.
Although Mr. White and his team praised radio and television stations,
the 64-page report was somewhat critical of un-identified broadcasting stations claiming
1
the smaller ones in partůcular had a reduced staff on Palm Sunday. I take
exception to this criticism by a bureaucratic agency. I know that Grand Rapids
radio and TV
and West Michigan stations have performed at top efficiency not only in
1
the Palm Sunday tragedy but in previous tornadom
situations
and
during severe storm conditions.
Mr. White pledged to give the investigating team's report immediate
consideration. And, he promised appropriate action to improve public safety
as soon as possible this, I am told, would include the installation of
a $27,000 radarscope at Grand Rapids to more quickly assess storm intensity
tornadoes
and to spot M well in advance.
-more-
radio tape May 12, 1965
- 3-
As of now, the Department of Commerce has not asked Congress for a
supplemental agungeriation bodget to provide for more radar and other storm forecasting
equipment.
If the need is proven, I am certain that Congress will approve the
expenditure with the assurance that the investment would save lives and
prevent injuries by providing advance, adequate tornado
warnings.
I am satisfied with the report by Mr. White and his investigating
team. And, I await what Mr. White said will be appropriate action to
improve public safety during severe storms and tornado conditions.
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting from Washington.
I will spek beback with you next week to discuss another vital public issue.
#
#
Fifth District Radio tape
to be taped May 12, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington
with some timely information on the vital issue of adequate warnings in
the event of tornadoes.
In the wake of the tragic storms that struck Palm Sunday causing
loss of life, injuries and property damage in the Fifth District area
of Nichigan and elsewhere in six states, I asked the United States
Weather Bureau here in Washington for a detailed report.
Robert M. White, Chief of the United States Weather Bureau, has
given me a Chapage report prepared by an investigating team of the
Department of Commerce.
After inspecting demage in Michigan and elsethere,
talking with local weather bureaus, civil defense and police agencies,
survivors and eye-witnesses, the tornado inspection team makes several
recommendations.
The team recommends in its better community blanning for
weather emergencies, the use of positive alerting devices, distribution to
the public of more information on tornadoes, and a strengthening of
severe weather reporting networks at the community level.
It is regretable that the lack of a radarscope in Grand Repids was the
cause of a delay in the local weather bureau giving radio and television
stations so-called "authorised" tornados warnings before the twisters
struck.
GERALD FORD LIDRARY
radio tape May 12, 1965
Blaming the absence of a radarscope, a member of the investigating
team claimed that the tornado warning message to radio and television
stations was delayed 8 minutes after the twisters rampaged through the
area.
However, I emphasise that Mr. White found--in his words--"nothing
wrong" with the way the Grand Repids weather bureau handled the
difficult severe storm situation.
The investigating team concluded that the death toll would have been
such higher had 1t not been for the excellent cooperation of broadcast
media in relaying severe weather warnings.
Although Mr. White and his team praised radio and television stations,
the 6h-page report was somewhat critical of un-identified stations claiming
the smaller ones in partâcular had a reduced staff on Palm Sunday. I take
exception to this criticism by a bureaucratic agency. I know that Grand Repids
and West Michigan stations have performed at top efficiency not only in
the Palm Sunday tragedy but in previous
tornadou situations and
during severe storm conditions.
Mr. White pledged to give the investigating team's report immediate
consideration. And, he promised appropriate action to improve public safety
as soon as possible....this, I am told, would include the installation of
a $27,000 radarscope at Grand Rapids to more quickly assess stom intensity
ternadoes
and to spot well in advance.
radio tape May 12, 1965
- 3-
As of now, the Department of Commerce has not asked Congress for a
supplemental budget to provide for more radar and other storm forecasting
equipment.
If the need is proven, I am certain that Congress will approve the
expenditure with the assurance that the investment would save lives, lives.,Fand
prevent injuries by providing advance, adequate tornado
warnings.
I am satisfied with the report by Mr. White and his investigating
team. And, I swait what Mr. White said will be appropriate action to
improve public safety during severe storms and tornado conditions.
This is your Congressmen Jerry Ford reporting from Washington.
I will speak with you next week to discuss another vital public issue.
# # #
RADIO-TELEVISION
MEMO
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
312 CONGRESSIONAL ROTEL WASHINGTON 3 , D. C.
LINCOLN 4-3010
Script No. 20
May 17, 1965
MEMORIAL DAY -- 1965
This is Congressmon
reporting to you from Washington.
In Arlington Cemetery -- only a few miles from where I am speaking to you now -- is a
memorial to all those Americans who died for their country. It is the grave of the Unknown
Soldier. As we observe Memorial Day this year, I would like to share with you some thoughts
on what this symbol means to all of US.
The grave of the Unknown Soldier is more than the grave of just one man. It is the symbolic
tomb of all those who died that the country they loved might remain a free Nation.
But the Unknown Soldier does not represent only the nameless dead. He represents every
American who was a casualty of war.
He is the boy next door, who went steady with the girl across the street -- and died fighting
for his country. He is the gas station attendant who used to service your car, the grocery clerk
who told you that there was a sale today on beef or poultry or eggs. He is the neighbor's son
who passed your house every day bicycling to school, until, suddenly, he was called away to war
to fight because the freedom of his country was in danger.
He is every soldier who faced the last reality -- every sailor who faced the last storm --
every Marine who battled to his lost landing -- every airman who soared into his last-beyond.
The grave of the Unknown Soldier is no vast and pillared tomb. It is as simple and honest as
the average American that it represents. And it is right that it should be so. Because there is
another memorial to those who died -- the mightiest, the most beautiful monument in all the
W orld -- America itself.
Every green and fertile field, every busy city street, every tall building reaching for the sky,
every home, every factory, every store, every school, every church are, in themselves,
monuments to those who died. Because these men and women marched to war, there is still a free
Nation called America, rich and vibrant and alive.
And there is something greater still, If not as tangible. It is the freedom, the liberty,
Americans still enjoy. Look out your window at the people passing by. Take note of the free-
swinging stride of the average American as he walks down the street; the children chasing each
- more -
- 2 -
other and laughing; the smiling talk of the women as they go shopping together. These are the
faces of happy, contented citizens, free to say what they like, criticize what they like, condemn
what they like, without fear of reprisal -- and all because of the Americans who died in war to
make it so.
Today, we are at war again -- although some chose to call it something else. Americans
are again risking life and limb for their beliefs -- in faraway Vietnam and in nearby Dominican
Republic. These are not yet world conflicts -- and conditions here at home have not so far been
too greatly affected by them. Outside of news reports, there are few daily reminders that
Americans in uniform are once again facing an enemy. But, because this is so, let US not forget
that Americans are once again being killed - to protect those personal freedoms Communism
would destroy.
This year -- Memorial Day, 1965 - let US pause if only for a brief moment of silent prayer
for victory in these struggles and the quick return of these valiant Americans. Let US remember
that some of them will never see this country again with its green fields, its lakes, its busy streets,
its sky-tall buildings. Let US make this Memorial Day a day of more than remembrance. Let US
also make it a day of prayer.
This is Congressmon
reporting from Washington.
(A copy of this script is available on teleprompter in the House TV Studios.)
####
RADIO SCRIPT FOR 5th DISTRICT STATIONS
for taping May 19, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford speaking with you from the
Jet mr
Nation's Capital. Today, I want to comment on two messages sent to Congress
by President Johnson during the past week.
The first recommended an excise tax reduction of four billion dollars,
and the second calls for extending the minimum wage Act, expanding the federal
unemployment insurance program, restricting overtime work by demanding payment
of double time wages, and repealing the provision which gives States the
authority to
approve enact vight N disappoone to work layd. membership regulations
Under the tax reduction plan, revisions in five stages would eliminate
most retail and manufacturers' excise taxes on July 1st, slice in half the
10 percent tax on automobiles by 1967, and phase out the 10 percent telephone
excise by 1969.
At the same time, the President recommended a boost in what he called
"user charges" by a total of $300 million annually. These charges would be levied
against those who use the Nation's airways, waterways and highways, in the form
of taxes on aviation gasoline, on Diesel fuel for trucks, and on fuel for boats
using inland waterways.
FORD LIBRARY & GERALD
-2-
The revisions in the present law would leave untouched some $6 billion
in taxes on tobacco and alcoholic beverages.
It should be pointed out that the President concluded the message with
these words " this is not our first tax cut " "it will not be our last."
The statement assumed Congressional approval even before the proposal reached
the House and Senate. It implies that we have a "rubber-stamp" Congress.
In commenting on the President's excise tax proposals, I can say that
I favor a reduction in these taxes which were first levied as a wartime emergency
measure.
However, -- if we are to have this reduction in revenue, we must also
find a way to reduce non-defense spending in a comparable amount, in order to
maintain fiscal responsibility.
It must be kept in mind that the United States is committed militarily
in two theaters of conflict 6,000 miles apart. There are indications that
Communist aggression may break out elsewhere in the world.
Our Nation must remain strong and ready to meet any emergency in the
battle against Communism. Therefore, we must maintain a financial position which
will be the foundation for a measured, meaningful military effort at almost any
moment.
Congress must carefully weigh the arguments for $4 billion dollar excise
from the President
tax reduction which was proposed without any assurance that there will be a
Unfortanity President Johnson, instead fauthing Mash mm multing spending, has encrease myd
cutback in non-defense spending. This is especially important now that our an
DERALO FORD ABRARY
-3-
Nation is taking a carefully calculated stand against the forces of Communist
aggression in two hemispheres.
In discussing the President's labor-management message, I emphasize
that Congress has a duty to the American people to examine his recommendation$most
nutrote Congress
carefully. We cannot simply rubber-stamp these far-reaching proposals made by the
Administration.
There must be complete and comprehensive Congressional hearings because
of the serious issues involved in the message -- particularly the President's
proposed repeal of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which authorizes States
to enact the right-to work laws.
It should also be pointed out that both labor and industry have serious
doubts about the workability of selected application of double pay for overtime
as provided in the President's plan. I share these doubts.
It is regrettable that the problems of agricultural labor were excluded
from the President's message. The need for farm workers in many parts of the
country is acute. The Administration, if it had any real concern for those
farmers who need competent labor, and for the consumer, could help alleviate
this serious problem.
Certainly there is need for improved labor-management legislation.
However, I will oppose any action by the federal government that injures our
economy, directly or indirectly hurts our laboring people, or nullifies the
proper responsibilities of the 50 States.
Thank you for listening. This is your Congressman, Jerry Ford,
reporting from Washington.
# # #
RADIO SCRIPT FOR 5th DISTRICT STATIONS
for taping MAY 19, 1965
This is your Congressam Jerry Ford speaking with you from the
Nation's Capitol on two messages President Johnson sent to Congress
this week.
The first recommended an excise tax reduction of four billion
dollars, and the second calls for extending the minimum wage, expanding
the federal unemployment insurance program, restricting overtime work
by demanding payment off double time wages, and repealing the right-to-work
law.
Under the tax reduction plan, revisions in five stages would eliminate
in half
retail and most manufactureres' levies July first, slice the 10 percent
tax on automobiles by 1967, and phase=out the 10 percent
telephone excise by 1969.
At the same time, the President recommended a boost in what he called
yt user charges" by a total of $300 million annually. These charges would be
levied against benefeciaries of the Nation's airways, waterways and
highways, in the form of taxes on fuel for commercial airlines, general
aviation,smix trucks and all boats using inland waterways.
The revisions in the present law would leave untounhed some $6 billion
in tax levies on tobacco and alcoholic beverages.
It should be pointed out that the President concluded== in his
words--- "this is not our first tax cut"..."it will not be our last."
& The he statement assumed Congressional approval even before the proposed law
GERALD LIBRARY FORD
May 19 radio tape
&
Fifth District
In commenting on the President's excise tax message, I can tell
you that I favor a reduction in this type of tax which was first levied
as a wartine
measure.
Novever,-1f we are to have this reduction in revenue, we must
also find a way to reduce non-defense spending to a comparable smount in
order to maintain fiscal responsibility.
It must be kept in mind that the United States is committed militarily
in two theaters of conflict 6000 miles spart. There are indications that
Communist aggression may break out elsewhere in the world,
Our Nation must remin strong and ready to meet any energency in
the battle against Communism. Therefore, we must maintain a financial
position which will be the foundation for a measured, meaningful military
effort at almost any moment.
Congress should carefully weigh the need for a $4 billion dollar
excise tax zut reduction without a cutback in non-defunse spending at
a time when the Nation is taking a carefully calculated stand against the
forces of Communist aggression in two hemispheres.
In discussing the President's labor-management message, I emphasise that
Congress has a duty to the American people not to rubber-stamp the
far-reaching proposals sought by the Administration.
There must be Congressional hearings in depth because of the serious
issues involved in the message---particularly his proposed repeal of
GERALD
May 19 radio tape
-3-
It should be pointed out that both labor and industry have serious
doubts about the workability of selected application of double pay for
overtime as provided in the President's plan... I share these doubts.
It is regretable that the problems of agricultural labor was excluded
from the message. The need for farm workers in many parts of the country
is acute. And, it seems to me that the Administration with its control
of the present Congress could help alleviate this situation.
Certainly there is need for improved labor-management legislation.
I will osspose impositions by the federal government, however, that
injure our economy, indirectly hurt our laboring people, or mullify
proper responsibilities of the 50 states.
Thanks you for listening. This is your Congressman Jerry Ford
reporting from Washington.
# # #
RADIO-TELEVISION
MEMO
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
312 CONGRESSIONA HOTEL WASHINGTON 3,D.C.
LINCOLN 4-3010
Script No. 21
May 24, 1965
THE VOTING RIGHTS BILL
This is Congressman
reporting to you from Washington.
If you were sick and were given the choice of two remedies -- one that would give you
a certain amount of relief but keep you coming back again and again for more treatment or one
that goes'to the heart of your ailment and cures you completely -- which would you take? The
second, of course -- the one that cures you completely.
Although simplified, that is roughly the choice that the House of Representatives faces
in its search for a cure for the voting rights illness facing this Nation. If the Administration's
voting rights bill is passed, many of our citizens -- now denied their basic right to vote --- are
not going to receive full and proper relief.
There is another voting rights bill, however, that really goes to the heart of the matter.
It is a bill introduced by House Republican Leader Gerald R. Ford of Michigan and Rep. William Nic
McCulloch of Ohio, ranking Republican on the House Judiciory Committee. This bill which
Republicans will offer as a substitute for the Administration's bill meets the problem of voter
discrimination head-on!
It eliminates the glaring weaknesses of the Administration bill and, at the same time, it
provides a direct, prompt method of dealing with the problem of voter discrimination because of
race or color. Let me tell you why.
First, the Ford-McCulloch bill seeks to Insure not only the voting rights of all Americans,
but their right to have their votes honestly and accurately counted after they are cast. It seeks to
wipe out the growing practice of illegal voting -- votes cast by voters who are not registered; by
voters who have already voted in other precincts; by voters who are no longer even alive. And it
provides stiff penalties for violators.
Second, it is nationwide in its application. It does not discriminate against certain
sections of the country -- as does the Administration bill. It does not base the need for Federal
action on a percentage of voters who went to the polls in a past election. Instead, it authorizes
action by the Attorney General as soon as he receives as few as 25 complaints from a country's
residents - complaints alleging that the right to vote has been denied because of racial
discrimination.
- more -
FORD LIBRARY i GERALD
- 2 -
Third, the Republican bill faces the fact that an important provision of the Administra-
tion's bill could be declared unconstitutional. This provision would abolish State and local poll
taxes when it is determined such taxes are used as an Instrument of voter discrimination. To avoid
this possibility, the Republican bill provides instead for a speed-up of existing judicial procedures
for declaring poll taxes invalid.
Let me point out another dangerous flaw in the Administration bill. This provision
requires that State and local governments come to a Federal Court in the District of Columbia for
validation of all future laws and ordinances relating to voting requirements. Never before in
America's history has it been necessary to come to Washington to get approval of a State or local
law. Establishing such a precedent could lead to the collapse of America's Federal system.
Let me make it unmistakably clear that I am appalled at the extent of voter discrimina-
tion and ballot frauds which blacken elections in America. Something must be done. But I do not
believe we should flout the Constitution, nor seek to doctor an ill through Insufficient means.
I, therefore, wholeheartedly endorse the bill Introduced by Congressmen Ford and
McCulloch, a bill designed to eliminate the scourge of voter discrimination, both effectively and
constitutionally.
This is Congressman
reporting from Washington.
(A copy of this script is available on Teleprompter in the House TV Studio.)
###
GERALD R
"Isue of the Day"
National Republican Congressional Committee
312 Congressional Hotel
Washington 3, D.C.
JACK R. ANDERSON
Lincoln 4-3010
Editor
SUBJECT: Our Investment in South Karea
May 26, 1965
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette points up a few facts about the recent visit to the United States
of South Korean President Chung Hye Park. He has cost the U.S. a mountain of wealth. The fact
that he has a somewhat stable Government indicates a degree of success in Korea. The fact that
his country is still divided indicates some degree of success by the Communists.
The amount of money we have had to pour into Korea is indicative of the extent of commit-
ment we have made toward freedom in Asia. The Post-Gazette states: "The continuing commit-
ment, more than a decade after President Eisenhower negotiated a truce in the stalemated Korean
war, involves the presence of some 50,000 Americans to bolster defenses South of the 38th Parallel
against the Communist North. Military and economic support since the war has totaled nearly
$9 billion. Economic and military aid is currently running at the rate of about $450 million
a year, and U.S. troops cost an added $310 million a year."
In addition to U.S. forces, there is the South Korean army of some 600,000, which recently
sent 2,000 engineering and construction troops to bolster U.S. operations in Vietnam.
The paper comments: "Although the South Korean economy continues weak, and constitu-
tional government has by no means taken firm root there as yet, the exper lence of Korea since
the downfall of the autocratic President Syngman Rhee in 1960 has been stability itself compared
with events in South Vietnam since the overthrow of President Ngo Dinh Diem." However,
President Park is not so secure that he is free of worry against coups. Just this month a number of
army officers were arrested on suspicion of plotting against the regime.
Student demonstrators recently forced Park to back down on an extensive fishing treaty with
Japan which would have given occupational payments of $300million and loans of $500 million
to the South Korean economy. Park also has problems with ousted political leaders, who fear
Japanese economic dominance of Korea and trouble for Park's government.
The Post-Gazette evaluates Park's efforts: "Despite setbacks, and from a Western point of
view, political immaturity, South Korea's people have given US reason to hope that they will find
their way."
###
No. 93
DERALD FORD LIBRARY
Radio tape for 5th District stations
for taping May 26, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington.
they bill The past week the the Home logiclative Committee process m the wes.s Jusiciary opened direction hearings
of a 100 that would make the assassination of the President and the Vice
President
one a federal of the crime early in support of the lystation
I was n witnesse, at a hearing before the judiciary subcommi ttoo. Among
others testifying was Representative Hale Boggs, with whom I served as
a member of the President's Commission on the Assassination of John F.
Kennedy.
Don its refort the
pointed out that
The se-called Warren Commission
after
found that there was no federal criminal jurisdiction over the assassination
of President Kennedy,
This fact was dramatically demonstrated to the Commission when we heard
testimony concerning activities at the hospital following the President's
death.
When it was proposed to transfer his body to Washington, local officials
in Dallas insisted that certain papers be filled out and that an autopsy be
performed within Texas, the state where the death occurred.
Presidential staff members who were present decided they would
remove the body from the hospital without permission of local and state
officials. Over the objections of some local officials, the casketwas hurried
into an ambulance and driven to the airfield. The result was an embarrassing and
disagreeable scene. It could have been avoided had there been a federal luw
FORD
covering the crime of assassination of a President.
GERALD
LIBRARY
-more-
radio tape May 26
-2-
There is another basic reason for making the murder of the President
a federal crime
assassination is an offense against the United States
government.
Also, when a President is assassinated, grave injury is done to the
functioning of the government, which may threaten the welfare of the
entire country.
At the same time, the reason for such an attack is anger at the manner
in which the President performs his official functions, or hostility toward
the office of President or the United States government or the American
system of democracy.
It is certainly the concern of the Federal government to try to prevent,
to guard against, to punish criminal conduct performed out of such motivation.
Under a new law, primary responsibility and final authority for the
investigation and prosecution of any attacks on the life of the President
would be placed in the hands of federal authorities.
Actual investigation would be conducted by federal law enforcement
officials, particularly the FBI, with the assistance of the Secret Service.
When the assistance of state or local agencies proved necessary or
desirable, it would be under the direction of federal agencies.
I certainly agree with J. Edgar Hoover who told the Commission that
if the FBI had jurisdiction under a federal law, Leed Harvey Oswald would
have
undorbtably
have not, been killed by Jack Ruby.
-more-
radio tape May 26
As Mr. Hoover stated: "the killing of Oswald has created a
great fog of speculation that will go on for years because of the things
that Oswald might have been able to tell which would have been of assistance
in pinning down various phases of this matter."
As one of our most capable law enforcement agencies, the FBI could
do much to insure the safety of possible defendants.
national
It is appalling to me that there is no
law making the
murder of the President a federal crime, especially considering that
four chief executives have been assassinated.
I am pleased that legislative action is under way with the goal of
I am am sure will will
having such a federal law, which in my opinion should be given
bi-partisan political support in the national interest.
Thank you for listening. This is your Congressman Jerry Ford
reporting from the Nation's Capitol.
# # #
RADIO-TELEVISION
MEMO
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
312 CONGRESSIONAL HOTEL WASHINGTON 3,D.C.
LINCOLN 4-3010
Script No. 22
June 1, 1965
WHO PAYS THE RENT?
This is Congressmon
reporting to you from Washington.
Today, t am going to discuss with you what I believe to be one of the most amazing frauds
ever attempted by the Federal Government. it goes far beyond any political pork barrel of the
past. I am referring to the Administration's proposed eight billion dollar rent supplement program.
To give you a quick example, this program --- If enacted into law - would provide that
an eligible family with an income of, let's say, two hundred and fifty dollars a month could rent
an apartment costing one hundred dollars a month -- with the taxpayers.picking up part of the tab.
Under the rent supplement formula this family would pay only sixty-two dollars and fifty cents
a month rent -- or one fourth of its income. The Federal Government - actually, the taxpayers
- would provide a subsidy of thirty-seven dollars and fifty cents to make up the difference.
It is claimed that this Federal rent subsidy program is designed to help low-income families
meet their monthly rent payments, to enable them to live better, in other words. If this were the
actual aim of the plan - If it would even, in a small measure, achieve this end many in
Congress would not be so apposed to it. But it will do nothing of the sort. Even the Government's
Housing Administrator, Robert C. Weaver, admits this.
On May the seventeenth, Housing Administrator Weaver appeared before the House Banking
and Currency Committee to try to "sell" the Congress on this program. He claimed that Federal
rent supplements would benefit low Income families throughout the United States. But -- just two
days later -- before a group of Pittsburgh civic leaders, Mr. Weaver did a complete about-face.
He said he doubted that the rent supplement proposal will help the poor much.
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Mr. Weaver actually went on to say that, under
the proposal, only those -- quote -- "with hearts of gold and heads of lead would construct and
rent housing units for lower Income families." Unquote.
Commenting on this about-face, one of my colleagues, Congressman Paul A. Fino, of New
York, exposed the whole fraudulent setup in one short and pointed sentence. He said and
I quote him -- "In effect, Mr. Weaver is saying that any Congressman or Senator who thinks the
truly needy would benefit from rent supplements must have a headful of lead." Unquote.
GERALD
LIBRAR
- more -
- 2 -
Having studied the rent supplement program proposed by the Administrator, I agree with
Mr. Weaver's second statement -- the one he made before the group of Pittsburgh civic leaders.
And I plan to oppose this measure when It reaches the House floor. Let me elaborate.
If the Administration's proposal will not help those in need of help, what will It do? Of
course, this is the eight billion dollar question. Let me point out a few of its obvious results.
In the first place, it will kill one of this country's basic incentives -- the incentive of the
American family to own its own home. To own one's home - no matter how modest - has always
been the goal of the typical American family. But, under the Administration's plan, a family that
is considering the purchase of a small seventy-five hundred dollar home, for example, will
suddenly wake up to the fact that, for the same monthly payments, It can rent a home that costs
from twelve thousand dollars to as much as twenty-five thousand dollars.
I am very much afraid that "keeping up with the Jones" via a Federal Government subsidy
will become the order of the day and home ownership a thing of the past. America could well
become a Nation of renters instead of a Nation of homeowners -- renters subsidized by the
Federal Government and so, willy-nilly, wards of the State.
To gain support for the Administration's proposal, the Government's Housing agency calis it
an experimenta program. I would like to bring up this question - are we in a financial position
at this time to afford an eight billion dollar experiment?
This is Congressman
reporting from Washington.
(A copy of this script is available in the House TV Studio.)
###
Fifth District radio speech
for taping June 2, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford speaking with you from the Nation's
Capitol. Today, I would like to discuss a vital financial matter involved
in decisions by the Congress. Simply stated, the issue is whether federal
spending is to skyrocket while the Nation is allowed to go deeper into debt.
There are three major elements involved in our cointry's current
financial status. One is the President's proposed reduction of about
$4 billion dollars in excise taxes. Secondly is the Administration's
plan to raise the debt
ceiling for the eighth time since President
Eisenhower left office. And third is the lack of restraint in spending by
the Administration.
Taking one issue at a time, let me say that as a member of Congress I
have for many years advocated a reduction in excise taxes. However, a tax
cut should go hand-in-hand with areduction in non-defense spending by the
federal government.
The second issue is a question of allowing the Administration to spend
and spend without having money to pay the bills, which means going deeper
and deeper into debt. The President favors raising the debt ceiling to $329
billion dollars. This is a startling figure when you compare our present
situation with that when President Eisenhower left the White House. When the
Democratic Administration took over, the debt stood at $298 billion and it
has climbed at a steady rate. As of last week, the national debt was more than
$318 billion, an increase of eight billion dollars since a year ago.
*more-
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
radio tape June 2
-2-
What does this mean to the American taxpayer? The answer is quite simple.
It means giving more hard-earned dollars to the government in taxes. For you
see, when
an individual, a business, or government goes into
and
has to borrow money, interest must be paid. For every billion dollars the
government borrows, taxpayers must provide over 33 million dollars a year
in interest. This year, in fact, taxpayers are paying over a quarter of a
billion dollars more in interest on the national debt than in 1964. Now,
the President wants Congress to go along with raising the debt ceiling to
$329 billion dollars and yet, I see no restraint on spending.
There is not time now tom list in detail some of the ways the government
is virtually throwing money to the winds. To give you one good example, however,
let us consider the subject of weather
including the forecasting of
storms, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes.
At present, 17
yes,
17
federal agencies are working in a maze of
conflicting, duplicating and expensive ways in the gathering, dissemination,
and analysis of weather information. A. member of the President's own political
party who is the powerful chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee
is quoted as saying "the weather picture is a mess there are entirely too
many agencies spending the taxpayer's money in this area. and the correction
of the situation rests with the Bureau of the Budget." I certainly agree
with my Democratic colleague.
more
GERALD
radio tape June 2
-3-
In light of many instances of wasteful extravagance and in view of the
determination of the President to increase rather than cut back on non-defense
spending, I am opposed to permitting the government to go into debt up to
$328 billion dollars.
I am alarmed at the recurring annual deficits and a national debt that has
grown from $289 billion dollars to over $318 billion dollars in four years.
I am concerned that fiscal responsibility is being brushed aside and ignored by
the Johnson Administration.
Fiscal responsibility demands a pay-as-you-go policy, except in times of
dire national emergency. Annual deficits in the federal government reflect the
present Administration's borrow-and=spend philosophy. And the interest alone on
the national debt has jumped from $9 billion in 1961 to over $11 billion this
year. These facts demand some financial soul-searching on the part of every
American, and especially on the part of the Administration and its controlled
Congress.
Certainly Americans want to see tax reductions. But I believe they are
opposed to increasing the public debt. They want spending by the federal government
to be controlled so we can have both a legitimate tax cut and a sound fiscal policy.
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington.
I will be back next week with another message from the Nation's Capitol. Thank
you for listening.
# # #
RADIO-TELEVISION
Tapel 6-9-45
MEMO
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
312 CONGRESSIONA HOTEL WASHINGTON 3,D.C.
LINCOLN 4-3010
Script No. 23
June 7, 1965
PINCH IN THE BUDGET
This
is your Congressmen Jerry Ford
reporting to you from Washington.
Today, I am going to talk to you about a subject that concerns all of us -- US family budgets.
I am very much afraid we are going to find ourselves in trouble, If we are not already -- spending
considerably more for essentials than we had anticipated. Food prices - as I am sure the ladies
in the audience know -- have already taken a shocking jump. And, according to a survey made
by the Associated Press, they are going still higher.
since
Food costs have risen 8 much as fifteen.per cent/last spring. This rise is nationwide,
though it varies considerably in different parts of the country. The housewives of Kansas City
seem to be the worst sufferers to date. Vegetable prices there have risen as much as fifty per cent.
One produce wholesaler in that city said he "never saw prices so high and quality so poor."
Another called the prices the "highest of all time" for that area.
Proving the point, the U.S. Labor Department's Consumer Price index, which measures
the prices we pay for food and goods and services, hit a record high the other day. And
indications are that It will go still higher.
What's in back of all these increased prices? Many factors, of course, including the
weather. But, in large measure, this Administration must shoulder the blame for what threatens
to be a wicked spiral of inflation.
For one thing, form programs enac ted in recent years have helped run up food costs.
White Home
Now, the Administration is asking for legislation which would increase the price of wheat 50
cents a bushel. This, of course, means a boost in the price of bread -- perhaps three or four
cents a loaf.
sec. Labor's
The Administration tabor policies have contributed to raising prices, particularly in
California and Florida. Even now, fruits and vegetables are rotting in the ground in those States
because there is not enough help to harvest the crops.
Another vital factor, of course, is uncontrolled Federal spending - and the continuing
budget deficits that go with it. This has contributed to inflation of the dollar so that we can't
buy as much with it a we used to.
GERALD
LIBRARY
more
- 2 -
The Government's spending habits, in short, are hardly prudent. For example, since
June 1963, we have added 14 billion dollars to the national debt. The Interest charges alone on
the debt cost you and me twenty-two thousand dollars a minute, every day. Yes, this very week,
the House is debating another Administration request to raise the ceiling on our national debt, to
$328 billion.
The effects of this continual debt-raising are felt at grocery checkout counters everywhere.
In Chicago, for example, a recent survey showed that potatoes - which cost seven to
eight cents a pound last spring --- today cost from nine to twelve cents a pound. Lettuce, which
last spring cost 15 cents a head, today has almost doubled in price, costing 29 cents a head.
In Washington Besten, it is the same story. Lettuce trup 20 cents a head, cabbage A cents and
war up to 454
up 5/5 0. pound
potatoes up 10 cents for G five pound bag. In your grocery, I am sure you have found much the
cost cost" 1,29 for Ten pounds.
same story.
As you feel the pinch in your family budget because of rising food prices, I am sure you
will agree that we must take steps to halt the erosion of our money. As a Member of Congress,
I plan to continue to battle for curbs on Federal spending, for sensible labor policies and for
farm programs which are in the best interests of the consumer as well as the farmer.
This is your Congressmon Juny Ford reporting from Washington.
copy-of this coulpt is dvallable on Teleprompter to the House The Creditor)
###
RADIO-TELEVISION
MEMO
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
312 CONGRESSIONA WASHINGTON 3,D.C.
111
LINCOLN 4-3010
Script No. 24
June 14, 1965
LOSING THE WAR
This is Congressman
reporting to you from Washington.
I don't have to tell you that all wars are wasteful. That is a sayIng almost as old as time.
War profiteers, black marketeers and other quick-buck artists have come to be accepted CS an
almost unavoidable evil in wartime. I very much regret to say that the recently declared war on
poverty is no exception to this rule. It is riddled with waste, riddled with extravagence and
riddled with war profiteering.
"Poverty experts" at fantastic salaries -- have mushroomed all across the country.
It is not too much of an overstatement to say that there are more generals than Gl's in the army
that is being raised to fight poverty in this country. I heard the project described recently as
"a billion dollar war of words headed for the usual stalemate."
Let me quote from a recent report on the poverty program Issued by several members of the
House Committee on Education and Labor: "The community action program -- as stated by
Chairman Powell and verified by testimony the brief hearings -- has been turned into a political
pork barrel by big city machines whose only interest in the poor is to exploit them." The report
goes on to say that "the entire act is the least coordinated, most confused tangle in recent memory."
Unquote.
The report charges that the Office of Economic Opportunity, under a part-time czar, is
an administrative shambles in which a fantastic number of highly-paid, casually-selected
amateurs frantically attempt to patch together programs that will reflect a favorable Image to
Congress and the public.
Even Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, a New York Democrat and chairman of the
House committee, did not mince his words. He had this to say about the war on poverty. Quote:
"In far too many communities, giant flestas of political patronage have been encouraged ...
compounding this political felony has been a debilitating friction between the State and local
poverty programs ... salaries are excessively high and in some Instances unreasonable and wildly
unrealistic there has been an obvious failure to carry out a most Important objective that
of involving the poor in the war on poverty ... there has been on overemphosis on planning
GERAL
LIBRARY
- more -
- 2 -
and dismal de-emphasis on action." End of quote.
To leave out the ten dollar words, what Chairman Powell means is this: The so-called
"war" on poverty has been all talk with nothing done, the talkers with their high salaries being
the only beneficiaries.
Chicago is certainly a case in point. There --according to the Reverend Lynward
Stevenson, who testified before a Congressional subcommittee -- the war on poverty is being run
purely for the benefit of Mayor Richard Daley's political machine. The majority of those serving
on the Chicago Committee for Urban Opportunity are on the city payroll or otherwise connected
with the city government. It is being run by men who -- let me quote the Reverend Stevenson's
own words -- "Drive Cadillacs, eat three-inch steaks and drink champagne at luncheon meetings."
It is my opinion that this program, rightly handled, could do a lot of good. But, because
of political profiteering, it is in grave danger of collapse. And this, even while the Adminis-
tration is asking Congress to double the program's size, spendîng almost two billion dollars in the
next fiscal year.
But, if the program collapses, the reason will be all too apparent: There are too many
generals in the war on poverty. For, while only one of mine projects in the poverty program is
even 35 per cent operational, the administrators are striking it rich. The Office of Economic
Opportunity has spent a whopping 85 per cent of fhe five and one-half mi Ilion dollars
budgeted for personnel and administration. And some of these tax dollars are going to fifty-
dollar-a-day consultants who handle routine correspondence.
It is little wonder that many Americans believe we are losing the war on poverty - even
before we enter the battle.
This is Congressman
reporting from Washington.
(A copy of this script is available on Teleprompter in the House TV Studio)
BARY
Fifth District radio tape
June 16, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington.
Developments in recent days and hours prompt this special message
dealing with the war in VietNam.
most Members The longress do not
I do not protchd to have/knowledge of the inside, secret military
full
strategy of the growing war. The President and his advisors, the defense
department and other agencies keep a tight lid ensuch information.
The Congress and the public at large have no idea at this time how
far the Administration plans to go in the use of American combat troops,
No member of Congress Republican or Democrat- should attempt to
assume the decision-making that rightfully and legally belongs to the
President as Commander-in-Chief. This is among the heay burdens of his
high office.
However, Congress must be responsible for seeing to it that actions
in the Vietnam war---or any other war---- are in the best interest of
America and the free world.
House and Senate Republican leadership has supported the President
in his firm stand against Communist aggression both in Vietnam and elsewhere.
We put/political put and differences_ta We were called to the White House several
times. Our suggestions and ideas on foreign policy were requested by the
President. Generally speaking, our answer was stand firm--take measured,
military steps
hold back the Communist aggressors.
DEBALO FORD LIBRARY
-more-
5th District radio tape
page 2
asked
I emphasize that while we were to make recommendations on
Dominican
policy in Vietnam and the Bominean Republic, we had nothing to say
whis
about the precise military actions.....The President makes the
combat decisions, including the targets to be bombed, the number
of American troops to be committed on the ground and in the air. If
we are to expand our efforts in Vietnam to a full-scale ground and air
war, it will be a Presidential order. He and he alone will be responsible
for either the military victories or defeats.
Certainly, the President is under great pressures--many of them
public. He has been criticised as trying to be both a field
marshal and a top sergeant,
thousands of miles from the actual
battleground. Critics have questioned the advisability of committing
more American ground troops. Others have wondered whether the President
is aiming at a negotiated settlement, including a coalition government
which conceivably could contain Communist elements.
It is easy to stand on the sidelines hurling criticism. I do not
believe in this negative activity. For example, I am somewhat
appalled that Administration spokesmen imply that the ground force
build up in Vietnam is either a Republican policy or a hold-over from
President Eisenhower. Nothing could be farther rom the truth.
have been of will be
The military actions in Vietnam were ordered from the White House.
If more troops are sent to fight it will be adecision of the President.
He has the burdensome responsibility of deciding, for example, whether
significant
to bomb more targets, or to increase our combat strength
--more-
5th District tape
page 3
by ordering more infantrymen and paratroopers into the growing war,
or to expand our overall committment in Vietnam.
I reassure you that House Republican leadership will C ontinue
to support a firm, determined policy in combating Communist aggression
wherever it threatens freedom at home or abroad.
However, the exact military steps--the bombings, the use of
combat troops, the expansion of the battleground-==are for the President
to decide--and order. The responsibility of Congress is to make decisions
on whether to allocate more--or less-- military funding, and to see that
the national interest is placed far above politics.
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford. Thank you for listening.
Next week I will have another report from Washington.
# # #
DERALD FORD LIBRARY
Fifth District Radio Tape
June 23, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington.
The first of the week a proposed federal law that would kill the incentive
of a family to own a home of its on is coming to the Meuse of Representatives
for a decision.
This bill has a provision that would establish a system of "free ride"
housing through government subsidy. Under it, for example, a person living
in New York with an income of $8,900 could have a $200-a-month apartment or house
with Uncle Sam paying $1,040 of the annual rent.
Or, for example, a family living in a $150-a-month apartment and earning
$400 would pay $80 in rent and the government would pay the other $70.
This free-ride rent scheme of the Democrat Administration would cost
American taxpayers $50 million in fiscal 1966---and Jump to $200 million in 1968.
And that would just be the beginnning of another ay to take money away rom
already-burdened taxpayers-----for the program has a potential cost of eight
billion dollars.
The Federal Housing Administrator blandly describes this fantastic,
ridiculous and absurd proposal 88 an experiment----well, $8 billion spent over
40 years is a mighty expensive and drawn-out experiment, e specially when it
sandbags the American public with another staggering financial burden.
-more-
GERALD LISEASY FORD
Radio tape fifth district
page 2
The free-ride rent provision--- a daring, brasen political gimmick
intended to collect more votes for the party in power===is based on
the mistaken belief that everyone, regardless of income, is entitled to
a new place to live with the government picking up most of the tab.
low income
The sacrifices of millions of families who today own
or rent adequate housing would be made maninglesss....md the free-ride
rental program holds out a will-o-the-wisp hope to eight million of these
families that they too are entitled to have part of their shiles shelter
costs paid by other American taxpsyers.
The provision would provide rent supplements based on income alone.
Nothing in the bill would prohibit financial hand-outs to a family of
low income which also has substantial assets.
At the same time, it makes individuals eligible for rent suuplements
without regard to age or ability willingness to work.
This absurd bill would duplicate the assignments of three federal
already
housing programs which provide help for the elderly and handicapped persons.
Also, it would further create an even more complicated tangle of federal
bureaucracy red tape hampering housing statutes and creating more chaos.
In my opinion the President has been sold a bill of goods. I cannot
believe he would buysuch a widewopen subsidy plan had be been fully advised
as to the potential evils of the program.
providing
The bill amounts to unequal opportunity in housing under the iron-fist
of a federal command. It is legislated dicrimination against the self-sufficient
5th District radio tape
-3-
It is unfortunate that this free-ride rent provision is included
in the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 which is a responsible
proposed law.
I hope that Congress--knowing the pitfalls and dangers of the
free-ride rent provision in the act==-will reject that part of the
proposed legislation.
Thank you for listening. This is your Congressman Jerry Ford
speaking with you from Washington.
# # #
GERALD
Fifth District Radio Tape
June 23, 1965
This is your Congressman Jerry Ford reporting to you from Washington.
The first of the week a proposed federal law that would kill the incentive
of a family to own a home of its own is coming to the House of Representatives
for a decision.
"The Housing Oct of 1965,"
This bill has a provision that would establish a system of "free ride"
housing through government subsidy. Under it, for example, a person living
in New York with an income of $8,900 could have a $200-a-month apartment or house
with Uncle Sam paying $1,040 of the annual rent.
Or, for example, a family living in a $150-a-month apartment and earning
$400 would pay "100 $80 in rent and the government would pay the other $70.
This free-ride rent scheme of the Democrat Administration would cost
American taxpayers $50 million in fiscal 1966-=and jump to #200 million in 1968.
And that would Just be the beginnning of another W ay to take money away f rom
already-burdened taxpayers-----for the program has a potential cost of eight
billion dollars.
The Federal Housing Administrator blandly describes this fantastic,
ridiculous and absurd proposal as an experiment----well, $8 billion spent over
40 years is a mighty expensive and drawn-out experiment, e specially when it
sandbags the American public with another staggering financial load.
-=IROre=
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
Radio tape fifth district
page 2
The free-ride rent provision- a daring, brazen political gimmick
intended to collect more votes for the party in power----is based on
the mistaken belief that everyone, regardless of income, is entitled to
a new place to live with the government picking up most of the tab.
low income
The sacrifices of millions of families who today own
or rent adequate housing would be made meaningless....and the free-ride
rental program holds out a will-o-the-wisp hope to eight million of these
families that they too are entitled to have part of their xiebities shelter
costs paid by other merican taxpayers.
The provision would provide rent supplements based on income alone.
Nothing in the bill would prohibit financial hand-outs to a family of
low income which also has substantial assets.
At the same time, it maljes individuals eligible for rent supplements
without regard to age or ability or willingness to work.
This absurd bill would duplicate the assignments of three federal
already
housing programs which provide help for the elderly and handicapped persons.
Also, it would further create an even more complicated tangle of federal
lay red tape hampering housing statutes and creating more chaos.
In my opinion the President has been sold a bill of goods. I cannot
FORD
RALD
LIBRARY
believe he would buysuch a wide-open subsidy plan had he been fully advised
as to the potential evils of the program.
more
5th District radio tape
-3-
It is unfortunate that this free-ride rent provision is included
in the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 which is contams a responsible a
number proposed law. & sound and necessary items.
I hope that Congress---knowing the pitfalls and dangers of the
free-ride rent provision in the act---will reject that part of the
proposed legislation.
Thank you for listening. This is your Congressman Jerry Ford
speaking with you from Washington.
# # #
GERALD FORD LIBRARY