Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
7787171
label
Turkey - Military Aid Embargo (5)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
7787171
contentType
document
title
Turkey - Military Aid Embargo (5)
collections
John O. Marsh Files (Ford Administration)
John Marsh's General Subject Files
subjects
Turkey
Drug abuse
Foreign aid
Legislation
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
7787171
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-10-31
month
10
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1975-07-01
month
7
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
da3bc7c7acc33185
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 42, folder "Turkey - Military Aid Embargo (5)" of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. Digitized from Box 42 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library Washington Post Friday, August 1, 1975 President Ford, n sinki, where he met kish leaders, wanted mission to resume mi ments to strengthen for negotiations on ( U.S. military bases in Madden told the ] terday, "You can't and explain away rageous tossing awa taxpayers' money fo of cutthroat crimina House Republican to keep the House : last night and force committee to meet, six Democratic mov journ. But when steadfastly refused t committee together, Leader John J. (R-Ariz.) finally yie REP. RAY J. MADDEN let the House adjou held onto bill before midnight. Heavily backed Effort toLift White House, the passed by the Se almed at making a Turkey Arms gesture to Turkey 1 ing a congressional weapons shipments 1 Ban Blocked into effect Feb. 5. The Turkish go took over partial e By Spencer Rich the bases last week, Washington Post Staff Writer House had refused t wasmington 1 USL Friday, August 1, 1975 Turks Reject Ford's Offer Of Arms Gift By Dusko Doder Washington Post Foreign Service 662 A S COPY Determined to be an administrative marking PRIORITY Cancelled per E.O. 12356, Sec. 1.3 and DE WTE #4100 2140114 Archivist's memo of March 16, 1983 P 020142Z AUG 75 ZDS By DAD NAR date 6/19/86 FM JACK MARSH TO DICK CHENEY, HELSINKI c 0 N D N DELIVER AT OPENING OF BUSINESS WH51413 FRIDAY AUGUST 1, 1975 8:45 PM TO: RICHARD CHENEY FROM: JACK MARSH LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY: FINAL 1. SENATE - NO SIGNIFICANT ACTION, EXCEPT ON DEFENSE CONFERENCE REPORT - PREVIOUSLY REPORTED. LONG "WINDFALL TAX" BILL DEFERRED TO SEPTEMBER. 2. HOUSE - NO FURTHER ACTION ON TURKEY. FINAL CONSIDERATION OF HR 7014 DINGELL ENERGY BILL DEFERRED TO 3 SEP. COMMITTEE ROSE BEFORE COMPLETING BILL. NO OTHER SIGNIFICANT ACTION. NOTES 1. WAYNE HAYS ADVISES HE CAN NOT SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION ON TURKEY IF PRESIDENT CALLS CONGRESS BACK. HE WANTED US TO BE AWARE OF THIS. 2. DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP FEARS "POCKET VETO" OF S1849, PETROLEUM ALLOCATION EXTENSION ACT, AND MAY DELAY SEND- ING BILL TO WHITE HOUSE UNTIL LAST NINE (9) DAYS OF RECESS. THIS IS INFORMATION MAX PICKED UP ON HILL, AND WE ARE TRYING TO CHECK OUT. 0206 FORD LIBRARY + GERALD RECALLED PSN:015006 PAGE 01 OF 01 TOR:214/01:14Z DTG:020142Z AUG 75 D N A S COPY o Marsh, Rumsfeld 543 *******UNCLASSIFIED*******S COPY FLASH DE WTE #4072 2130509 Z 010512Z AUG 75 FM THE WHITE HOUSE TO DICK CHENEY, HELSINKI UNCLAS WH51402 AUGUST 1, 1975 TO: RICHARD CHENEY FROM: JACK MARSH ROLL CALL VOTES TO ADJOURN HOUSE THURSDAY NIGHT: YEA NAY 1. 184 196 2, 156 194 3. 151 198 4. 140 200 5. 137 202 6. 142 205 VOTES REFLECTED MANY THINGS, BUT THERE IS GENERAL FEELING IT REFLECTED A SHOW OF STRENGTH ON TURKEY ISSUE. 0130 WHSR COMMENT MARSH, RUMSFELD PSN:013882 PAGE 01 OF 01 TOR:213/05:09Z DTG:010512Z AUG 75 *******U NCLASSIFIE D*******S COPY 0 FORD i LIBRARY 938839 August 4, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: LES JANKA THRU: JACK MARSH BILL KENDALL FROM: CHARLES LEPPERT, JR. SUBJECT: Scoville and Ikle 1 etter on the Utility of U.S. bases la Turkey Max Friedersdorf asked that I obtain a copy of the Scoville letter on the marginal utility of our bases in Turkey and to have you prepare a rebuttal for circulation on the Hill. Please note that also attached is the response of Mr. Fred C. Ikle. FORD i LIBRARY 9ERALD JOHN F. BERLING WASHINGTON OFFICE 14TH DISTRICT OHIO 1234 LONGWORTH HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING TELEPHONE (202) 225-5231 COMMITTEES: JUDICIARY INTERIOR AND Congress of the United States DISTRICT OFFICE: 411 WOLF LEOGES PARKWAY INSULAR AFFAIRS AKRON, OHIO 44311 House of Representatives TELEPHONE (216) 762-9323 Mashington, D.C. 20515 July 31, 1975 Dear Colleague: Last week I circulated a letter from Dr. Herbert Scoville stating that the Turkish bases have only marginal utility in verifying past and future strategic arms limitation agreements. It seemed to me that Dr. Scoville's views had an important bearing on the claims by the Administration that the Turkish bases were essential for this purpose. Dr. Scoville is one of the foremost U.S. experts in the fields of strategic weaponry, arms control and scientific intelligence gathering, with more than twenty years of service in important posts in the Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency and Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. In connection with the Administration's efforts to obtain consideration of a revised compromise resolution on a partial lifting of the ban on arms shipments to Turkey, I received a phone call yesterday from Dr. Fred C. Ikle, Director of. the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Dr. Ikle called to say that he considered the bases very important for monitoring both present and future arms control agreements. I suggested to Dr. Ikle that he review Dr. Scoville's letter and give me his comments, and I offered to give his comments the same distribution that I had given to Dr. Scoville's letter. Both letters are attached, in order that Members may draw their own conclusions as to the adequacy of Dr. Ikle's response to the points made by Dr. Scoville. Sincerely, John SEIBERLING, JFS:jmb GERALD FORD LIBRANT July 31, 1975 Dear Congressman Seiberling: I wish to follow up on your questions as to the importance of U.S. bases in Turkey for the verification of arms control agreements. In particular, you were interested in my reactions to the letter by Doctor Herbert Scoville, Jr. which you inserted in the Congressional Record of July 22, 1975. In his letter, Dr. Scoville states that the bases in Turkev are not well located to monitor the SALT Interim Agreement and the ABC1 Treaty. While the sites in Turkey have made some contribution to monitoring the AB1 Treaty, it would be shortsighted to consider the verifiability of only those limitations which were agreed to in the past. The Interim Agree- ment will expire in two years and the SALT II agreement now under negotia- tion will have additional limitations more difficult to monitor. Moreover, we must ensure that our verification capabilities will be adequate for further limitations and reductions to be negotiated after SALT II. If we permit our verification capabilities to contract, how can we expand the scone of future arms control limitations? Many members of Congress expressed an interest in limiting cruise missiles. As far as we can anticipate, the verification of such limits will have to be based primarily on the observation of tests. For this purpose, bases in Turkey would play a crucial role; without them, any actual or likely potential test locations could not be monitored. It would take many years and considerable investment to develop alternate means of verification, if the gap could be closed at all. We must also keep in mind that the Soviets may change the location of their test sites or the way in which they use them. This possibility lends added importance to the U.S. monitoring facilities in Turkey. The suggestion has been made that the facilities in Turkey could be moved to another country. But this would forfeit Turkey's unique geo- graphic location. Moreover, such a relocation would almost certainly en- tail new political vulnerabilities. Classified data necessarily omitted from this letter would lend greater clarity and force to these conclusions. However, the importance of the Turkish bases for the monitoring of arms limitations agreements can be sufficiently appreciated, I think, from the considerations sketched here. Please let me know if I can provide you with additional information. Sincerely, FRED C. IKLE, Director FORD is LIBRARY GERALD United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency July 20, 1975 Dear Congressman Seiberling: This is in answer to your request for my views on the usefulness of our Turkish bases for verifying the SALT agreements. i understand that it has been argued that these bases are essential for ensuring that the Russians are not violating the SALT I ABi1 Treaty and Interim Agreement on Offensive Weapons and that they are also necessary if we are to verify any future agreements deriving from the Vladivostok Accords. While there is no doubt that the Turkish bases provide useful information on certain aspects of the Soviet military complex, to say that they are essen- tial for verifying past or future SALT agreements would appear to be such an exaggeration as to raise questions as to the sincerity of those making the statements. First, with respect to the ABM Treaty, the bases would appear of marginal if any value. A glance at the globe will show their unsuitability for observa- tions of the Soviet ABil Test Site at Sary Shagun, which is on Lake Balkash about 2,000 miles east of Turkey. That country is far less satisfactory for observing activities at the Test Site than would be bases in countries directly to the south. Turkey is not a good location for observing whether their radars are being tested in the ABH mode or their SAM missiles are being tested against incoming ballistic missiles. It has no value at all for verifying deployment of ABils. While the Turkish bases are closer to the Russian ICBM, IRBM, or MRBM test launch areas, which are north of the Caspian Sea, information on such firings that might come from the Turkish bases is not of any great value in verifying the ABN Treaty. The Turkish bases provide no information relative to the Interim Agree- ment on Offensive Weapons, since this agreement only freezes deployment of offensive missiles, not their development or testing. Information on deployment comes from observation satellites, not from surface observation posts. Thus, the Turkish bases have little if any value in verifying either of the SALT I Hoscow Agreements. It is harder to be so categorical relative to future agreements, since details on these are still unknown. However, looking at the Vladivostok Accords, it is doubtful whether the bases can be very important. As with the Interim Agreement, these bases have no relation to the ceiling on deployment of delivery vehicles. They could be of some value relative to the ceiling on HIRVd missiles, since a factor here is what types of missiles have been tested with MIRVs. However, the key observation [point] to determine this is not at the launch end of the test range, but at the re-entry point which occurs on the Kamchatka Peninsula in the Pacific Ocean. Both of those areas are subject to observation from U.S. ships or land areas. It is these locations, not the Turkish bases, which have provided the information that the Secretary of Defense has used to announce Soviet MIRV tests. If observation of the launch areas were essential, then verification would be impossible, regardless of whether we had the Turkish bases, since there is nothing to prevent the Russians launching from one of their operational sites far from the Turkish bases. Finally, there are other land areas closer than Turkey for observing the current Soviet missile test launch area to the north of the Caspian Sea. In sum, the Turkish bases have only marginal utility in verifying past or possible future SALT agreements. Other observation sites and satellites would appear much more useful. SALT cannot be reasonably used as a justification for making a decision on our Turkish aid program. /s Herbert Scoville, Jr. Former Assistant Director of CIA for Scientific Intelligence and Deputy is Director for Research FORD GERALD LIGHT AUG 6 1975 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 5, 1975 ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR: JACK MARSH FROM: JIM CONNOR for SUBJECT: Turkey Vote The attached material was returned in the President's outbox with the request that they be returned to you. cc: Don Rumsfeld LIBRARY GERALD 8. FORD SECRET Dmm SECRET FOR COMMCENTER USE ONLY PRECEDENCE LASSIFICATION DEX ROM: JACK MARSH DAC 015 GPS O: DICK CHENEY LDX PAGES 4 FOR THE PRESIDENT TTY CITE DTG: 29 22587 RELEASED BY: JP TOR: 29 2324/RLC PECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: TO HELSINKI of GERALD LIBRARY SECRET SECRET DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12356, Sec. 3.4 (b) THE WHITE HOUSE White House Guide Lines, Feb. 24, 1983 WASHINGTON By D/D NARS, Date 6/12/86 July 29, 1975 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: DICK CHENEY FROM: SUBJECT: JACK MARSH July Turkey Vote The House leaders are pushing for reconsideration of the Turkey vote by coming up with a proposal to go for the same bill plus the so-called Nelson Amendment as an added section to the bill. (A copy of the Nelson Amendment is at the end of the cable.) We have pointed out to them the Administration's objection to this type proposal but they insisted it is necessary to show some change in the bill in order to justify Members changing their vote. It is their view that we have to have this provision if we want a recon- sideration. This proposed addition is the same as the provision which related to the Jordan arms sale. Vice President met with Bipartisan Senate leaders this morning to urge reconsideration action and they are agreed. The present plan is to attach the Turkey bill as amended to the Board of Inter- national Broadcasters bill, currently contained in the State Depart- ment Authorization legislation now in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The Broadcasters bill has been reported out separately with the Turkey Amendment and is slated for Senate Floor considera- tion Wednesday. Max advises that Bob Griffin is making a Whip check. Assuming favorable Senate action, efforts have been made for speedy consideration in the House Rules Committee with the hope for action in the Rules Committee late Wednesday and House Floor action Thursday. SECRET SECRET LIBRARY SECRET SECRET -2- We have made some progress today on turning around House votes but are troubled by the front page story in the New York Times today which indicates that Turkey may not relent on all base closures even if the legislation passes. A copy of the New York Times story is attached. A similar story was carried with a full page headline in the Washington Star today. Leadership sponsors in the House are at work to either firm up or switch votes there. We are trying to concentrate here on both House and Senate votes but primary effort in the morning directed to the Senate. Max reports the following Congressional action: -- The veto on the Health-Nurses Training Bill was over- ridden in the House by 384 to 43. -- The Elk Hills Bill passed the Senate by the vote of 93-2. The House Rules Committee today granted a rule on the Resolution of Disapproval for the President's Decontrol plan and this vote will probably occur Wednesday, July 30. - - The Rules Committee also granted a rule making the Krueger Amendment in order as an amendment to the Dingell energy bill, also under consideration on the House floor. The Krueger Amendment closely parallels the President's Decontrol Plan, but would be subject to amendment on the House Floor. SEODET SECRET SECRET new 10rk limes SE Tuesday, July 29, 1975 Turks Assert Some Bases Will Stay Closed for Good Senior Officials Say Domestic Politics Would Rule Out Reopening Even If Congress Ultimately Lifts Embargo By STEVEN V. ROBERTS Special to TheNew York Times SECRET On page 5, after line 17, add the following new section: (e) In the case of any letter of offer to sell any defense article or defense service pursuant to the Foreign Military Sales Act or to furnish grant military accistance the authority of the Foreign Act of 1961 for $25,000,000 or more, the President shall submit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a statement containing (1) a brief description of the defense article or defense service to be offered, (2) the dollar amount of the proposed sale or grant, (3) the United States armed force which is making the sale or grant, and (4) the date on which any letter of offer to sell is to be issued or grant is to be made. The letter of offer shall\ not be issued nor the grant made if the Congress, within twenty calendar days after receiving any such statement, adopts a concurrent resolution stating in effect that it objects to such proposed sale or grant. Determined to By Archivist's Cancelled per memo E.O. of 12356, administrative March Sec. 16, 1983 1.3 marking and DAD NARS date 6/19/86 GERALD FORD SECRET CONFIDENTIAL PRESIDENT HAS SEEN Imm CONFIDENTIAL FOR COMMENTER USE ONLY PRECEDENCE CLASSIFICATION DEX FROM: JACK MARSH DAC 039 GPS TO: DICK CHENEY LDX PAGES 4 FOR THE PRESIDENT TTY CITE INFO: DTG: 31 04447 RELEASED BY: JP TOR: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: DELIVER OPENING OF BUSINESS 1975 JUL 31 03 57 Proud R. has m P. GERAL CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL To: CHENEY CONFIDENTIALS FROM: MARSH Wed, Subput: BACKGROUND for the President 11:25 Dick - p/m We have been successful in separating the Byrd proposal from the Senate Turkey bill so he will not be amending our bill. Present plan is for Senate consideration at 2:00 p/m Thursday. Head count last made tonite is 46 yea 36 NAY 14 Ques. We are encountering difficulties in getting House DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12356, Sec. 3.4 (b)- White House Guide Lines, Feb. 24, 1983 By SAP NAR Date WILL CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL consideration by Rules because of delay that developed in Senste. This is first item of business for MAX and me Thursday. Some Senate supporter are relectant to proceed unless the House will consider. Broomfield has inquired of Max if there was a desire by the administration to go forward, or pull down the bill. We are advising our last advice is to proceed Other matters of interest in event you are unaware DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12356, Sec. 3.4 (b) White. House Guide Lines, Feb. 24, 1983 BERALD LISSER ver By DAD NAME Date 6/19/86 CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL include following: 1, N.H. Senate sent back by Senate to N.H. for special election 2, Pay adjustment amend- ment carried in House 214- 213. We will be working Turkey matter closely both Houses and will advise any developments, Regards to all, Jaik Turkey Head count follows separate meono. Prepared by Kentall in cooperstion Senafe Rep. LdRs. GERALO CONFIDÊNTIAL CONFIDENTIAL Beall * I.N. Bayh > Nunn Bellmon Bentson * \ Pastore * * Brock Biden Pell Brooke Bumpers Proximire* 1 * Buckley Burdick * Randolph Case Byrd (Va) * Ribicoff A Curtis Byrd (WVa) *: Sparkman Dole ? Cannon * Stennis * Domenici Chiles * Stevenson Fannin * Church Stone 1 * Fong Clark ? Symington * Garn Cranston Talmadge ) Goldwater Culver X Tunney * A Griffin Eagleton 1 Williams * Hansen Eastland. AB A Hatfield Ford Republicans (39) Helms Glenn * Hruska Gravel YEAS 27 Javits ? Hart (Colo) NAYS 6 Laxalt Hart (Mich) # 7 4 Mathias Hartke * Absent / McClure Haskell ? (R) Total 38 Packwood Hathaway 7 Pearson Hollings Percy IN Huddleston Democrats (61) Roth * Humphrey */.N. Schweiker Inouye YEAS 19 Scott (Pa) * Jackson * NAYS 30 Scott (Va) Johnston 7 10 Stafford * Kennedy * K Absent 2 Stevens Leahy (D) Total 61 Taft * Long Thurmond Magnuson A Tower Mansfield * * GRAND TOTAL (100) Weicker McClellan Wyman(?)- McGee * YEAS 46 Young McGovern NAYS 36 McIntyre N R 14 Metcalf n Absent Mondale ? Montoya V Total 99 * Morgan * Up for Election ** Announced Retireme DATE: 7-30-775 SUBJ: N = if Needed Determined to be an administrative marking and Cancelled per E.O. 12356, Sec. 1.3 LIBRARY GERALD s) Archivist's memo of March 16, 1983 By: IM 6/9/86 SEGRET FLASH FOR COMMCENTER USE ONLY ONLY SECRET PRECEDENCE CLASSIFICATION DEX FROM: JACK Marsh DAC 029 GPS TO: Cheney For THE PRESIDENT LDX PAGES / TTY CITE INFO: DTG: 3001582MD RELEASED BY: ED TOR: 3022052/wn SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Phose sen has RET FRED is GERALD LIBRARY SECRET THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN FLASH THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 30, 1975 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: DICK CHENEY FROM: JACK MARSH Jul SUBJECT: Turkey Vote We have suddenly encountered unexpected difficulties in consideration of the Turkey measure today in the Senate. At least three Senators object to its consideration today and they indicate if Mansfield brings it up, they will filibuster. One of these is Senator Eagleton. who will agree to its consideration tomorrow, Thursday, but will not agree to consideration today. At present those support- ting him in his objection are expected to be Senators Jackson, Stevenson and possibly Humphrey. Max and I have personally talked with Mike Mansfield and he plans to go for- ward, but is anticipating difficulties if he does. I have advised him that we wish he would proceed rather than not bring the bill up. To delay until tomorrow poses other serious problems in both the Senate and the House. Other legislation is already scheduled for Thursday in the Senate and Mike expects some problems in trying to reconsider tomorrow. On the House side, there is a problem with the Rules Committee in getting favorable Rules Committee action in time for consideration on the Floor Friday. Our vote count in the Senate looks favorable, but Leadership on both sides are very concerned about the problems I have mentioned. We have talked personally with a number of the objectors, but so far with- out success. We will be sending you another communication to keep you advised of the situation here. SECRET DECLASSIFIED SECRET E.O. 12356, Sec. 3.4 (b) FORD is LIBRARY GENALO White House Guide Lines, Feb. 24, 1983 By DAD NARD Date 6/19/86 SECRET WHD073 00 WTE15 DE WTE 4043 2120136 Phosen 0 310030Z JUL 75 FM JACK MARSH TO DICK CHENEY FOR THE PRESIDENT ZEM SECRET DELIVER AT OPENING OF BUSINESS WH51385 JULY 30, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: DICK CHENEY FROM: JACK MARSH SUBJECT: TURKEY VOTE SENATOR MANSFIELD CALLED UP THE TURKEY MATTER BUT BECAUSE OF THE PARLIMENTARY SITUATION, HAD TO MOVE BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. AGREEMENT WAS REACHED TO CONSIDER THE MEASURE AT 2:00 THURSDAY IN THE SENATE. HOWEVER, SENATOR HARRY BYRD AT THE LAST MOMENT MADE A RESERVATION WHICH PRECLUDES CONSIDERATION UNLESS HE CAN OFFER AN AMENDMENT ON THE PANAMA CANAL. I CALLED HARRY AND URGED HIM TO WITHDRAW HIS RESERVATION AND HE TOLD ME HE WOULD CONSIDER MY REQUEST BUT WANTED TO THINK IT OVER. I HAVE ALSO ASKED SEVERAL OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SENATE TO SPEAK WITH HIM PERSONALLY. IN LIGHT OF THIS, AS OF THIS TIME, WE STILL HAVE NO ASSURANCE THIS WILL COME UP IN THE SENATE THURSDAY. NOTE: SUBSEQUENT TO THE PREPARATION OF THIS MEMORANDUM, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM SENATOR HUMPHREY AND THEY HAVE AN AGREEMENT FROM HARRY BYRD THAT HE WILL NOT OFFER HIS PANAMA AMENDMENT TO THE BROADCASTERS BILL TO WHICH WE HAVE ATTACHED TURKEY UNLESS OUR TURKEY AMENDMENT IS DEFEATED. IT APPEARS WE NOW HAVE A TENTATIVE GO-AHEAD FOR TOMORROW IN THE SENATE. 0237 4043 SECRET DECLASSIFIED FORD is LIBRARY BERALD NNNN E.O. 12855, Sec. 3.4 (b) White House Cuido Lines, Feb, 24, 1983 By DAD MAD Date 6/19/88 SECRET 1 OR 3102152 WHD072 00 WTE15 THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN P.has P6 DE WTE 4042 2120152 0 310130Z JUL 75 sum FM JACK MARSH TO DICK CHENEY FOR THE PRESIDENT ZEM SECRET DELIVER AT OPENING OF BUSINESS WH51384 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: DICK CHENEY FROM: JACK MARSH SUBJECT: TURKEY VOTE -- HOUSE SITUATION THIS HAS BEEN A VERY FLUID DAY ON THE HILL ON TURKISH AID. THE HOUSE SITUATION IS VERY UNSETTLED INSOFAR AS A VOTE COUNT ON THE ISSUE. DICK BOLLING AND CARL ALBERT SPOKE TO MAX AND INDICATE GREAT CONCERN ABOUT THE CHANCES OF REVERSING THE VOTE. BOLLING ADVISES THERE HAS BEEN EROSION ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE OF OUR SUPPORT. JOHN RHODES ALSO INDICATES THAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN DIFFICULT ON THE REPUBLICAN SIDE. HE SAYS THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE OF POSSIBLY ONLY 7 VOTES. WE HAD AN INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING BY SCHLESINGER OF REPUBLICANS WHO WERE AGAINST US. MICHEL THINKS TWO OR THREE MAY HAVE CHANGED. ZABLOCKI AND BROOMFIELD ARE FIRM IN THEIR DESIRE TO GO FORWARD. WE ARE HAVING A PROBLEM IN GETTING RAY MADDEN TO HOLD A RULES COM- MITTEE MEETING. CARL ALBERT ASKED THAT I CONVEY TO YOU PERSONALLY THE FOLLOWING COMMENT FROM HIM. APPARENTLY DICK BOLLING SHARES THIS VIEW. CARL SAID TO TELL YOU THAT IF THE RISK OF FAILURE WOULD DO YOU GREATER DAMAGE IN YOUR PRESENT SITUATION THAN DELAY, THEN HE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU DELAY. ON THE OTHER HAND, HE WANTS YOU TO KNOW THAT IF YOU WANT THE MATTER BROUGHT TO A VOTE, REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME, THEN HE WILL DO WHATEVER HE CAN TO BE HELPFUL. I MIGHT ALSO ADD THAT CARL INDICATED IF YOU DESIRE THAT HE WOULD BE GLAD TO SEND YOU A MESSAGE IN RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER ON MONDAY TO HIM ADVISING THAT BECAUSE OF THE PRESS OF THE LEGISLATIVE SCHEDULE THAT THE HOUSE COULD NOT BE RESPONSIVE TO YOUR REQUEST BUT THAT HE WOULD URGE IT BE A MATTER OF FIRST CONSIDERATION WHEN THE HOUSE CONVENES AFTER ITS RECESS. BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE SENATE, IT MAKES IT DIFFUCULT TO ASSESS THE HOUSE SITUATION. MY VIEW IS THAT WE SHOULD CONTINUE IN OUR EFFORTS TO PROCEED. HOWEVER, I THINK WE CAN GET A MUCH BETTER ESTIMATE OF THE SITUATION TOMORROW MORNING. MAX AND I WILL BE TALKING WITH HOUSE REPUBLICAN LEADERS ON THE SEQUOIA TONIGHT DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12356, Sec. 3.4 (b) END OF PAGE 01 White House Guide Lines, Feb. 24, 1983 By DAD NAME Date 6/19/86 GERALD SECRET SECRET AND WILL PASS ON THEIR VIEWS. 0395 4042 NNNN SECRET BERALD FORD CIBRARY crossed: Scowcroft (backup) Turbey aid August 6, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: BRENT SCOWCROFT FROM: JACK MARSH The President is very interested in the attached and wanted you to review it, particularly from the standpoint of developing a position when this matter again comes before the House for debate. I would be very grateful for your guidance. JOM/dl memo from Charlie Leppert to Les Janka re: Scoville and Ikle Letter on the Utility of U.S. Bases in Turkey, encloses a "Dear Colleague" Ltr from M/C John Seiberling and Ltr from Dr. Ikle to M/C Seiberling LIBRARY GERALD ? FORD Washington Post Wednesday, August 6, 1975 How to Break the Turkish Impasse Washington Post Wednesday, August 6, 1975 Congress and the Turkish Arms Embargo: Two Views THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Date 8/26 TO: Jach march FROM: PATRICK O' DONNEL poel FOR YOUR INFORMATION FOR YOUR COMMENTS avel i FOR APPROPRIATE HANDLIN <16 VIRIARY 0 GERA OTHER Per your request for musting the 11:00 Am for cur Calout req OTHER B : LOB НУИДГӀЙС LOB ЛОПВ CONWENTS : LOB лоль ; ) LKOW: LVIBICK OrDOMMETT 10: leof Dris 8/98 мугніиедой THE MHILE нолее THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 27, 1975 TURKISH ARMS EMBARGO On May 19, 1975, the Senate passed S. 846, legislation to fully lift the arms embargo against Turkey by a vote of 41 to 40. Con- sideration was then delayed in the House until mid-July. At that time, compromise language was worked up which would have pro- vided for only a partial lifting of the embargo -- i.e., it would have released non-grant items in pipeline and permitted future commercial sales. This measure, reported by the House International Relations Committee on July 16, was rejected by the House on July 24 by a vote of 223 to 206. Subsequently, the Senate introduced a bill containing the identical language of the House-rejected compromise bill, and passed it on July 31 by a vote of 47 to 46. The legislation was then sent to the House and referred to the House Rules Committee. However, Chairman Madden refused to convene his committee in time for the bill to come to a vote on the House floor before the August recess. Nevertheless, Madden has indicated that the House Rules Committee will consider the bill when the Congress reconvenes -- probably during the second week of September. There are indications from the Hill that there are sufficient votes in the Rules Committee to clear the measure for a House vote, and that efforts to have the bill sent back to the International Relations Committee for additional hearings will fail. FORD & LIBRARY GERALD Cong Relation August 30, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: MAX FRIEDERSDORF FROM: JACK MARSH You have a copy of the Wall Street Journal item of August 29th in which a distribution has been requested. This is something we should discuss as to just how that should be done. My suggestion would be to have Broomfield do this. JOM/dl FORD is LIBRARY ACRALD AUG 29 1975 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 29, 1975 ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR: JACK MARSH FROM: JIM CONNOR The attached article was received in the President's outbox with the following notation: "Distribute to Lead ers and House" Please follow-up with appropriate action. cc: Don Rumsfeld Max Friedersdorf HE WALL-STREET JOURNAL, FRIDAY, AUGUST 20, 1975 How Liberals Aided Israel's Foes By EDWARD JAY EPSTEIN eastern flank of NATO, and that ultimately to "protect" the sizable Turkish minority - --- ladn the at Casson ----- the - nd 11.6 d