Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
1103398
label
Mineral Leases and Royalties
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1103398
contentType
document
title
Mineral Leases and Royalties
collections
Bradley H. Patterson Files (Ford Administration)
Bradley Patterson's Native American Programs Files
subjects
Minerals
Indians of North America
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1103398
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-08-01
month
8
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1975-08-01
month
8
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
6f0be3caf98ebe73
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 4, folder "Mineral Leases and Royalties" of the Bradley H. Patterson Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Re: Indian affairs 8/1 OIH TM AMERICANS for INDIAN OPPORTUNITY 1816 JEFFERSON PLACE. N.W., WASHINGTON D.C. 20036 (202) 466-8420 LaDonna Harris August 5, 1975 President BOARD OF DIRECTORS I. W. Abel Lionel Bordeaux. Signs Edgar Bowen. Com-Oregon Terry Brown. Karek Lee Back The no Price M. Cobbs. M.D.S. Eugene Crawford. Stearity Ada Deer. Menominez Jack Edma. Sheehene The Honorable Gerald Ford Blackfeet The White House Coy G. Eklund Roy George. Washington, D.C. 20500 LaDonna Harris: Commerche The Honorable Williams L Hensley, Esidmo Dear President Ford: Rev. Theodore M. Hasburgh. C.S.C. Minerva Jenkins Apachers I am absolutely outraged by the reports in the Forrest Kassanavoid, Commacher Yvonne Knight. Pones enclosed article from the New York Times indicating Louis LaRose. Winnebego that the Interior Departments Audit and Investigation David Lester. Creek Office has concluded that Indian tribes are not Demis Limberhand. Northern Cheyenne receiving "all royalty payments due them" for Philip Martin. leases on their reservations. Grace McCullah Namehas N. Scott Momaday. Klower Jerry Muskrat. Cherelore We shall appreciate receiving an immediate Joe Dan Osceola. Sominate Morgen Otts. report of the tribes and the amounts of money Apache-Arapaho-Kieesc Maria Tallchief Pascher, Ourge they have been denied and your plans for restitution Elma Patterson: Tuscarere including interest on the money due and not paid Jack Rushing. Creek to them. Joe S. Sando. Jemes Vickie Santana. Southern Piegan-Blockfeet W.J. Strickland. Lumbee Our studies of the leases made by the Federal James A. White. Menomines Government for Indian resources reveal that they are among the poorest in the world to begin with. To find that even their meager terms are not being met is simply outrageous. We shall appreciate hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, LaDonna Harris- President CC: Senator Jackson Senator Abourezk GERALD 8 FORD LIBRA Digitized from Box 4 of the Bradley H. Patterson Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 9 AIO AMERICANS for INDIAN OPPORTUNITY 1816 JEFFERSON PLACE. N.W.. WASHINGTON D.C. 20036 (202) 466-8420 August 13, 1975 LaDonna Harris President ence- BOARD OF DIRECTORS I. W. Abel Lionel Bordeaux, Sioux Edgar Bowen, Coos-Oregon Terry Brown, Karok Lee Buck The Honorable Gerald R. Ford Price M. Cobbs, M.D. The White House Eugene Crawford, Sioux Ada Deer, Menominee Washington, D.C. 20500 Jack Edmo. Shoshone-Bannock. Blackfeet Coy G. Eklund Dear President Ford: Roy George. Nooksack LaDonna Harris, Comanche The Honorable William L. Hensley, Eskimo Due to my negligence, I did not put in the enclosure Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C. with our President's letter to you on August 5, 1975, Minerva Jenkins, Apache Forrest Kassanavoid, Comanche which was an article from the New York times concerning Yvonne Knight. Ponca royalty payments to Native Americans on their leases. Louis LaRose. Winnebago David Lester, Creek Dennis Limberhand, Northern Cheyenne Please accept my deepest apologies. Philip Martin. Choctaw Grace McCullah, Navaho N. Scott Momaday. Kiowa Sincerely yours, Jerry Muskrat. Cherokee Joe Dan Osceola. Seminole Morgan Otis. Apache-Arapaho-Kiowa Maria Tallchief Paschen, Osage Elma Patterson, Tuscarora Charlene Kepher Jack Rushing, Creek Joe S. Sando. Jemez Charlene Nephew Vickie Santana, Southern Piegan-Blackfeet Secretary to LaDonna Harris W. J. Strickland, Lumbee James A. White. Menominee President Enclosure GERALD FORD THE NEW YORK TIMES, SUNDAY, JULY 27, 1975 U.S. Failing to Get Its Due in Oil Royalties Problem Is For example, it found that Rather the failure of the undervaluation of gas pro- Government to get all the duction in just one year by royalty income it could and the Northern Rocky Moun- should receive was set down Pinpointed tain area offices cost the to an inexport accounting Government $136,000 in roy- system and imprecise report- As Official alties, and that "the real ing procedures that often led loss is probably several times to company errors and delays that figure." in payments. Ineptitude Again it discovered that There was an oblique sug- a postaudit by just one of gestion that the Geological the Geological Survey's six Survey, an agency made up area offices that covered largely of scientists and en- By E. W. KENWORTHY only 10 per cent of the ac- gineers, was more interested counts under its supervision in oil exploration and devel- produced $362,000 in added opment than in collecting WASHINGTON-The Unit- royalties. royalties, and that therefore ed States Government is not The highly critical report the survey should be relieved getting full value from on- comes at a time when the of the latter responsibility. shore gas and oil leases on Geological Survey has been In commenting on the un- Federal lands, according to under fire on other fronts. derstaffing of the Royalty a review of the royalty ac- Its expertise has been called Accounting System, which counting system by the Inte- in question by oil company has only 54 employes, and rior Department's Office of geologists who have regarded its lack of expertise, the Audit and Investigation. the survey's estimates of the report said that interview Nor, the study concludes, nation's undiscovered, re- suggested this was due to "a are Indian tribes receiving coverable oil as highly opti- negative attitude on the part "all royalty payments due mistic and unrealistic. of management." them" for leases granted on In the early 1960's the A scientific organization, their reservations-a finding survey's estimate ranged the report said, had a tenden- that the Office of Audits from 400 billion to 590 billion cy is "underestimate the me- says raises questions about bar.els. Last year, however, portance of other disciplines the Interior Department's Vincent E. McKelvey, the or to relogate other disci- proper discharge of its "trust survey's director, estimated plines to minor roles." responsibility." it to be 200 billion to 400 If this was putting it mild- These conclusions were billion barrels. And a few ly, the report also put it reached after an investiga-> weeks ago, the estimate was bluntly when it said: "The dropped to 50 billion to 127 Conservation Division [of the tion lasting from March to December last year of royal- billion barrels-roughly the survey] has never come to ty collections, which, under estimate of oil company and grips with the issues of es- the 1920 Mineral Leasing independent geologists. tablishing fair product value Act, are the responsibility In another area, the Gener- and verifying production vol- of the Interior Department's al Accounting Office dis- ume." Royalty payments are closed that several high level based on volume of output. United States Geological Nevertheless, the report Survey. survey officials were stock- credited the Conservation The report found that the holders in companies affect- vision with recognizing the losses sustained by the Fed- ed by actions of the survey. shortcomings in royally of- eral Government, the states There have been com- Tection and requesting the with which Federal income plaints 0.1 Capitol Hill and study. is sháred, and Indian tribes from consumer and environ- Furthermore, in a lengthy were attributable to the Geo- mental organizations for a comment on the audit report, logical Survey's undervalua- long time that the upper the Conservation Division en- tion of oil and gas pro- echelons of the Geologic Sur- dorsed many of the recom- duction, inadequate and vey were too heavily staffed FORD mendations made. For CX- confusing reporting proce- with scientists and engineers ample, the division. under dures on production and who had come from the oil direction of Russell Wayland, sales by oil companies, de- and gas industries or who said: "We agree that there layed royalty payments, poor- intended to go into such em- is a need to expand the pres- accounting procedures, fail- ployment after Government ent accounting staff and ure to conduct reviews of service. that more professional company reports and staff However, there was not accountants should be deficiencies in both "exper- the slightest suggestion in hired." tise and numbers." the audit report of any collu- The survey now adminis- The report said that it was sion between officers in the ters 12,386 leases on Federal impossible to put a figure survey's Royalty Accounting and Indian lands, involving on the total losses, but there System and oil and gas pro- 31,399 producing oil and gas was reason to believe them ducers. Nor was any wells. "significant," probably on evidence adduced of deliber- Under the law and regula- the order of several million ate cheating of the Govern- tions, lessees winning com- dollars a year. ment by the companies. petitive bids pay from 12½ to 25 per cent royalty on and 10 per cent to the Feder- "strictly through the gener- Among the oil and either 12½ or 16 al Treasury. osity of the purchaser. Area tions of the audit team 2/3 per cent on gas produced Among the practices un- offices receive such state- standardized and timply from the leases. The royalty covered by the review, un- ments for only about 70 to porting, "meaningful rate depends on the daily dervaluation occurred when a 80 per cent of the leases. ties" for reporting of royal- average production per well simple sales price was taken. Furthermore, the study said, ties due and for late -the greater the production, the higher the rate. The supervisor of each were often the same compa- ments (present penalties Geological Survey area of ny, "which makes the control described as "meaning The leases are sold in com- fice, on the basis of produc- mechanism unreliable." separate accounting for petitive bidding when they tion reports by the lessees, This confused reporting tiple interests in a lease and contain Reological structures is empowered to set the indicative of oil and gas system is further fragmented frequent reviews of accounts. value on which royalties are where a lease is held by Most important, however, potential. On non-competi- to be paid. several companies - all of were the personnel recom- tive leases-those on un- known geologic structures- In setting an "estimated which are permitted to file mendations: a 37-person in- the production royalty is reasonable value," the super- separate reports on their pro- crease in staff (eight nc- visor is required to consider portional ownership of pro- countants and 29, clerks); duction and royalties due. creation of a team compris- 12½ per cent on both oil "the highest price paid for The area offices then com- ing a lawyer, an engineer, an and gas. a part or a majority of pro- pound the confusion by accu- accountant and an economist Total royalty proceeds are duction of like quality in mulating all the separate to be responsible for value not peanuts-smounting as the same field, to the price ownership statements into tion of production in all they did to $220-million in received by the lessee, to one "balance carry-forward areas, and appointment inf A posted prices and to other amount" for the whole lease. systems manager to oversee 1974. This was nearly double relevant matters." "As a result," the report all aspects of a centralized the 1973 figure because of Thus the value for royalty said, "the statement becomes royalty accounting system the sharp rise in the price no one official is now in computation is not necessar- almost meaningless to the of now oil following the Arab lease interest holders and the charge, the report ily the sales price received embargo imposed late in The estimated cost inr by the producer. However, Geological Survey because 1973 and the subsequent the review found that with neither can readily differen- added positions was surge in the price of import- tiate which portion of the a year. few exceptions, the Geolog- ed oil. or this amount, $33.4- That said, the Office of ical Survey computed royal- account balance carry-for- million went to Indian tribes. Audit and Investigation has ties on the sale price. It par- ward applies to each lease The Federal income split interest. turned to investigating off ticularly noted that, in setting is 37.5 per cent to the states The upshot was that "de- shore practices, conducting gas values, area offices gave where the leases lie, to be "virtually no consideration" linquent balances were al- a study of royalty collections used for schools and high- from leases on the outer con- to area prices established by lowed to accumulate until ways; 52.5 per cent to the tinental shelf. the Federal Power Commis- the Geological Survey deter- Federal Reclamation Fund, sion for sale of natural gas mined royalties due from in interstate commerce. each lease interest and sub. The review gave two mitted appropriate billings." causes for this situation- In some cases, the study said, lack of established guidelines "years may elapse" between for area offices and lack of the account reviews. capable staff. This situation was respon- As to reporting procedures, sible, the report stated, for the review found that "infor- the large amount of late pay- mation needed is not always ments, although it added that required to be submitted and many companies had become the information that is re- "somewhat lax" about mak- quired is not always submit: ing payments within the re- ted, or sometimes not sub. quired month after produc- mitted on time and ofter tion. The total overdue submitted in a. nonstandarc amount in December, 1973, format." was $3.3-million, which re- sulted in interest loss to the Data, the review went on comes in "from differen Government for the year of $104,000. sources at different times during the month." Thus, the operator may submit a pro- duction report; the lease holder may submit a sales the lessee and the purchaser and royalty report, and the various purchasers may, or may not, submit statements of their purchases. The purchasers' statements FORD are the only method that the Geological Survey has of verifying the producer's stated sales volumes and LIBRAN values. The trouble is that the purchasers' statements are not required and are sup- plied, as the àudit stated, AIÓ AMERICANS for INDIAN OPPOR TUNITY 1816 JEFFERSON PLACE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 (202) 466-8420 The Honorable Gerald Ford The White House Washington, D.C. 20500