Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 33
This does not mean that there will never be another named, as to what action I ought to take about Bellamy's remain- but the Holy Father does not seem to intend naming one ing in the service; that is, she did not give it to me. at present. The matter is one of a very delicate nature Your direct or implied complaints of and reflections upon for it lies so entirely with His Holiness himself and I my- my own personal conduct give me no concern, but I am self cannot venture to interfere unduly. Ihad never heard very gravely concerned at the mischievous effect your let- that the Holy Father had expressed himself in the way ters must have in misrepresenting the position of the United referred to by you and I fancy there must be some mis- States government, and by the far reaching governmental understanding. However, I am sure that any attempt to scandal your indiscretion may at any time cause. bring pressure to bear in such a delicate matter cannot fur- I have now seen your letter to me, sent through Mrs. ther your wishes. I should also say that the same wish Roosevelt. In it you actually propose that I should au- has been conveyed just as forcibly and with equally good thorize you to go to Rome to take part in what I must call reasons in favor of at least two other very distinguished an ecclesiastical intrigue - and to drag the United States Prelates in the United States, so that in the event of the Government into it. Such a proposal is simply astounding. Holy Father determining to name another American Car- You say that Cardinal Merry del Val has stated that I dinal the choice of the person would not be as easy a matter have requested that two archbishops - one Farley, be as it may seem to those who very naturally have only one made Cardinals. All you had to say was that such a state- in view. More than this I cannot say without overstep- ment was a deliberate untruth because you knew that I ping the limits of a discretion which I must be the first to had refused to make such a request even for Ireland. observe in a matter of this nature. With kind regards You say in your letter You can trust me, really.' to the Ambassador I am, dear Mrs. Storer, How can you say this when you write to Taft a letter Yours devotedly in Christ, which if by accident published would absolutely mis- R. CARD. MERRY DEL VAL. represent, in the most mischievous manner both me and the American Government? You have no more right to meddle in these matters than Mrs. Reid would have to meddle in the Ritualist controversy, or Mrs. Tower to (3) try to take charge of the relations of Germany to the American Lutherans. THE WHITE HOUSE Your letter to Mr. Taft, and the letters to Cardinal WASHINGTON, December IIth I905. Merry del Val and Archbishop Keane (of the answers to which you enclose copies) and your letter to the Princess My dear Mrs. STORER, - Secretary Taft has just shown Alexandrine (of the answer to which you also enclose a me your letter of November 26th, this letter being evidently copy) are all letters which it is utterly improper for you to intended for me as much as for him. On inquiry of Mrs. have written, in your position as the wife of an American Roosevelt I find that she had received from you a letter to Ambassador, and show a continued course of conduct on me which is probably the one to which you refer in your your part which is intolerable if your husband is to remain letter to Mr. Taft, but she tells me she treated this letter in the diplomatic service. In the first place I wish it to be as she sometimes has treated other letters that you have explicitly understood that though since I have been Pres- sent her to deliver to me, when she knew that the receipt identIhave been approached at different times by prelates of them would merely make me indignant and puzzle me of your church and even by laymen in your church with 56 57 2