Ask the Scholar

Page 13 of 15
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 13

OCR

HARRY ARCHIVES "NATIONAL RECORDS TROMAN AND LIBRETT - 2 - U.S. SERVICE" On April 17, April 28 and May 4, 1950, the Commission received arrest records from the FBI oovering the names of persons arrested by the District of Columbia police for alleged sex offenses, or for investigation pertaining to sex offenses. The original group of arrest records were received assembled by agencies in which the individuals supposedly were employed. On April 12, 1950, the Commission received a letter from the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation containing the names of 269 persons, allegedly Federal employees reported to have been arrested by the District of Columbia police for alleged sex offenses, or investigation for alleged sex offenses. In checking the reports of arrest of the original group of persons against the list forwarded by Mr. Hoover, it was found that in general the names of the persons included in the original group of arrest records were included in Mr. Hoover's list of 269 names. However, some of the arrest records were not included in Mr. Hoover's list and on the other hand, arrest records had not been received in many cases named on Mr. Hoover's list. Some of the arrest records were checked against the Commission's service records to determine whether the departments and agencies had been properly identified on the attached memoranda accompanying the arrest records. This preliminary search revealed that the agencies in which these persons were reported to be employed differed greatly from that reported on the memoranda. Therefore, it was necessary to check each of the reported arrests against our service records to determine where the person was employed, if actually in Federal employment. Also, it was necessary to secure from the FBI arrest records on the persons named on Mr. Hoover's list but on whom we had not received arrest records. Search of the Commission's service records indicated: l. That some of the persons apparently were never employed by the Federal government. 2. That some of them apparently were not presently employed in the Federal government. 3. That some of them still were within the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission. 4. That the remainder were in the exclusive jurisdiction of depart- ments and agencies. It is apparent that had the Commission sent copies of these arrest records to the agencies indicated by the memoranda accompanying them when received by the Commission that much unwarranted confusion and embarrassment to individuals and agencies would have resulted. Likewise, it would not have been practical to have reported the arrests without first obtaining the arrest record reflecting the individuals' fingerprint identification.

Page data

Page
13
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
8732c44931122a7e
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
54962871
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "54962871",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/54962871",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Correspondence Between Charles Sawyer and Donald S. Dawson with Attachments and Related Correspondence",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/54962871",
    "collections": [
        "Confidential Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Confidential Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 15,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "54962871",
    "label": "Correspondence Between Charles Sawyer and Donald S. Dawson with Attachments and Related Correspondence",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/54962871"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "54962871",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/54962871",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Correspondence Between Charles Sawyer and Donald S. Dawson with Attachments and Related Correspondence",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/54962871",
    "collections": [
        "Confidential Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Confidential Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 15,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/54962871",
    "naId": 54962871,
    "coverageEndDate": {
        "dateQualifier": "ca.",
        "logicalDate": "1950-06-30",
        "month": 6,
        "year": 1950
    },
    "coverageStartDate": {
        "dateQualifier": "ca.",
        "logicalDate": "1950-05-01",
        "month": 5,
        "year": 1950
    },
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 13,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/71/9628/54962871/content/presidential-libraries/truman/598863/1066164-44-13.jpg",
    "mediaId": "8732c44931122a7e",
    "ocrText": "HARRY ARCHIVES \"NATIONAL RECORDS TROMAN AND LIBRETT\n- 2 -\nU.S. SERVICE\"\nOn April 17, April 28 and May 4, 1950, the Commission received arrest\nrecords from the FBI oovering the names of persons arrested by the District of\nColumbia police for alleged sex offenses, or for investigation pertaining to sex\noffenses. The original group of arrest records were received assembled by\nagencies in which the individuals supposedly were employed. On April 12, 1950,\nthe Commission received a letter from the Director of the Federal Bureau of\nInvestigation containing the names of 269 persons, allegedly Federal employees\nreported to have been arrested by the District of Columbia police for alleged\nsex offenses, or investigation for alleged sex offenses. In checking the\nreports of arrest of the original group of persons against the list forwarded by\nMr. Hoover, it was found that in general the names of the persons included in the\noriginal group of arrest records were included in Mr. Hoover's list of 269 names.\nHowever, some of the arrest records were not included in Mr. Hoover's list and\non the other hand, arrest records had not been received in many cases named on\nMr. Hoover's list.\nSome of the arrest records were checked against the Commission's service\nrecords to determine whether the departments and agencies had been properly\nidentified on the attached memoranda accompanying the arrest records. This\npreliminary search revealed that the agencies in which these persons were\nreported to be employed differed greatly from that reported on the memoranda.\nTherefore, it was necessary to check each of the reported arrests against our\nservice records to determine where the person was employed, if actually in\nFederal employment. Also, it was necessary to secure from the FBI arrest records\non the persons named on Mr. Hoover's list but on whom we had not received arrest\nrecords.\nSearch of the Commission's service records indicated:\nl. That some of the persons apparently were never employed by the\nFederal government.\n2. That some of them apparently were not presently employed in the\nFederal government.\n3. That some of them still were within the jurisdiction of the Civil\nService Commission.\n4. That the remainder were in the exclusive jurisdiction of depart-\nments and agencies.\nIt is apparent that had the Commission sent copies of these arrest records\nto the agencies indicated by the memoranda accompanying them when received by\nthe Commission that much unwarranted confusion and embarrassment to individuals\nand agencies would have resulted. Likewise, it would not have been practical to\nhave reported the arrests without first obtaining the arrest record reflecting\nthe individuals' fingerprint identification."
}