Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 6
From: Industry Members Wage Stabilization Board March 22, 1952 RE 7500 Ext. 4821 Dissention in the Steel Case As industry members of the Board we are fully aware of the tremendous import- ance of this case not only to the parties directly involved but to the entire country. It has presented the first major test of the Board's ability, first, to operate in the field of labor disputes without doing violence to its primary duties as a wage stabilization agency and second, to recommend "fair and equitable" terms of settlement in a case of grave national significance. In our considered judgment the majority recommendations fail to meet this test in several major respects: 1. The recommended settlement on the money issues goes beyond the amounts permitted by existing Board regulations and policies and would have a major inflationary impact on the economy. p 2. The weight of the United States Government has been thrown behind the union's drive to extend the union shop in American industry by exploiting the defense emergency. 3. The recommendations as a whole reflect a conscious and admitted effort to recommend terms of settlement which the union would accept. No similar effort was made to assure that the terms would be acceptable to the companies involved. 4. The Board majority refused to make clear and positive recommenda- tions on several issues of great importance to the companies because they were complex and could not be intelligently handled before the deadline imposed by the union for Board action. Money Issues The Industry Members proposed a recommendation for a 9c increase in wage rates--the maximum permissible under any proper application of Board Regulations 6 and 8. In this connection they were mindful of the fact the movements in steel

Terms

Relations