Harry S. Truman, Final Exam in Torts, Kansas City School of Law

Kansas City School of Law FINAL EXAMINATION IN TORTS How. OHN PEW MR. LUDWICK GRAVES MAY 5th, 1924 MR. C. L. CARR S.Truman I. A, a minor, 10 years of age, is injured through negligence in an auto- mobile accident. You represent the party who caused the injury, and after negotiations, have agreed with the father and mother to sèttle all claims arising out of the accident for the sum of $750.00. State in detail how you would make this settlement SO as to protect your client from future claims or lawsuits out of the a se tlement with him by order of the or someone else next friend make Hase any the minor arising appoint accident. his father cant and then settle with the father and mother I would give the minor the largest A owned part small of moving the $74000 picture show. and He employed pay the operator parents a an of the local operators union. He found that he could save by dis- charging the operator and operating the machine himself. This he did. His wife sold tickets and he had a boy who took up the tickets at the door. A, his wife and the boy constituted the entire operating force of the show. The union objected to A operating his machine himself as the rules of the union did not allow the owner of a show to operate his own machine and required that a union operator should do so. A refused to accede to their demands; was ousted from the union and fined by the union. He continued to operate his show. The union picketed his show, peaceable, asking people not to patronize it as it was unfair to organized labor. As a result of this picketing the receipts of the show fell off about $15.00 a week. A asked for an injunction against the union, its officers and members, to prevent this picketing. The lower court relused to grant the injunction for the reasons that the defendants would be deprived of their rights of free speech and personal liberty and that said picketing was peaceable, and therefor his right of action was a suit for damages. What should be the holding on appeal? Give your reasons. (221 S. W. 95.) order for a poin injunction. The holding on avent the appeal was an Itemas stated by the count that one hight of of a man to III. noak for himself. the Losie laws of business was the Give verbatim the six essential ingredients of actionable fraud. / The decist or misrepresentation must be ofa Deffendant material made fact. same to influence the plainstiff conduct action acted as was delivered protended. 3. That alaintiff relying on such represent 4 That was nature 5 knew itstas untau and receively desearched statement placety. was T. La state damag which the presen