Document
Telegram from David K. E. Bruce to Secretary of State Dean Acheson
- Része ennek Korean War Files (Truman Administration), Department of State Files
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of Suite
NLT(KOREA/SD) $92
3
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
18 B.X
Control: 1346
Action
Rec'd: January 4, 1952
UNA
FROM: Paris
8:31 .m.
Info
SS
TO: Secretary of State
DECLASSIFIED
G
NO: 3976, January 4, 2 p.m
were
EUR
Authority
FRUS 1952-54 Parts
DCE
By DEB NLT
141 879
NIACT.
Date 3 -13-85
EYES ONLY FOR THE SECRETARY AND HICKERSON FROM BRUCE.
DEPTEL 3790, January 3
After numerous conversations and interviews drafts, re-
drafts, and clearances and detailed consideration by top
officials French Govt, we have now (rpt now) received from
Schuman reply to Secretary's personal message contained
DEPTEL 3780 Jan 2. Free translation of reply follows:
"I have studied your message of Jan 3 with the attention
and interest I attach to all your communications.
I regret that you did not consider it possible to accept
the revisions that I had proposed to you in the draft com-
mon statement, the final drafting of which was communicated
to me on Dec 28. Although my more recent suggestions had
as their aim only to return, with the addition of one word,
to the first version which had been presented to me by you,
I understand the reasons for your insistence which Ambassador
David Bruce has explained to me.
I am certain that for your part you appreciate the diffi-
culties which the French Govt must face. Because especially
of the threat which hangs over Indochina, the French Govt
has the duty of neglecting no precaution in order to avoid
having the armistice in Korea, whose conclusion it keenly
desires, produce a further aggravation of the situation in
the Far East.
It is in this spirit and in order to avoid the delay that
you rightly fear, that I have decided to give my agreement
to the text which has already received the agreement of the
other interested countries.
You will understand that this agreement is, however, accom-
panied by the two following reservations:
(One) The final part of the statement could not (rpt not)
imply any change In the agreement according to which all
measures
REPRODUCTION OF TN
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
MESSAGE IS PROHIBIT
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to