Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
196067603
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3VETINAVAL AIDE) 451
09
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
DECLASSIFIED
WASHINGTON
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
December 29, 1952
By DEB NLT, Date 9-11-85
TOP SECRET SEGURITY INFORMATTON
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
KOREA
Ambassador Briggs in Pusan questions the
wisdom of UN Command proposals to try
prisoners of war who are guilty of offenses while interned on
the grounds that such trials might be turned into a Communist
propaganda bonanza. He also doubts whether even the threat
of capital punishment would effectively deter professional agi-
tators from fomenting trouble. In this connection, Embassy
Tokyo informs us an Army intelligence study will be completed
shortly showing direction of prisoner of war camp agitation net-
work by North Korean General Nam-Il at the same time he was
participating in the armistice negotiations. Ambassador Briggs
suggests that the whole subject of the prisoners be restudied,
not only with respect to prevailing camp conditions and the problem
of maintaining discipline, but in relation to our political strategy
and political objectives. Our envoy to Korea believes that if
we estimate prospects of obtaining an armistice are now remote,
consideration might be given to a separate solution for the anti-
Communist prisoners not desiring repatriation, or of moving the
prisoners out of Korea altogether and relocating them in areas
where control conditions are less difficult.
At the same time we have told our representa- -
tives in London and at the UN that if the British raise again the
question of information on prisoner of war incidents they be told
that information received in Washington on this subject has al-
ways been made available promptly to the UK Embassy here.
Embassy London states, however, the Foreign Office in antici-
pation of further Parliamentary questions is planning to raise
the following questions with us: 1) Why are prisoners kept in
such large groups as to enable them to defy the guards by sheer
force of numbers? 2) Why have camps been constructed on terrain
where tear gas is useless? 3) Why are camps built on hilltops
from which prisoners are able to attack the guards?
TOP SECRET SECURITY INF ORMATION