Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
196816706
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2the
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
WASHINGTON
State By DEB NLT, Date 9-4-85
Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
March 28, 1951
SECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
FOUR-POWER
The 18th session of the Paris talks on
EXPLORATORY TALKS
Tuesday was the longest to date, and
was featured by a restatement of the
Western position, a long propaganda harangue by Gromyko, and the intro-
duction of the following new tripartite agenda proposal: 'Treaties of peace
with Rumania, Bulgaria and Hungary including their provisions on human
rights, their military clauses and their final clauses on settlement of dis -
putes. 11 Chairman Davies interrupted Gromyko finally with a request for
the Deputies views on adjournment; Gromyko had not yet begun his com-
ments on the new tripartite proposal, and will continue his statements to -
day.
We have informed Jessup that we share
his recently expressed feeling that we must soon try some new approach
to the agenda. We think it would be best to use a fully neutral and fairly
simple proposal. It appears to us that further elaboration of the present
tripartite proposals can only result in an undesirably complex agenda and
at the same time we would incur the risk of serious erosion of our position
concerning the use of the phrase "German demilitarization". We think that
a proposal (such as the French recently suggested at a tripartite meeting)
for a divided agenda which would state that under item 1 (causes of inter -
national tension) the Western Powers would discuss certain items and that
the Soviets would discuss certain items might provide the best solution
which could be obtained, provided the Western Powers' list of items
favorably presented the Western point of view.
Should it become necessary eventually
to break up the meeting without agreement, we believe it would be
preferable that this take place because of a Soviet refual to accept an
obviously neutral agenda, and not because of some refinement of phrase-
ology in a more complex formulation, the true significance of which it
would be difficult to explain to world opinion. We think it would be tacti-
cally preferable to inaugurate this new approach in quadripartite meetings
SECRET