Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
197026196
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
DÉCLASSIFIED.402
WASHINGTON
E.O. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
12065, Sec.
State By Dept. DEB NLT, Date 9-9-B5
March 25, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INFORMA TION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
SAUDI ARABIA
The Department has instructed Embassy London to ex-
press to the Foreign Office our disappointment over the
negative outcome of the Damman Conference between the Saudi Arabians
and the British over disputed territory on the Arabian peninsula and our
hope that the talks might be promptly resumed along constructive lines.
We suggest that Churchill should send a frank and friendly message to King
Ibn Saud expressing his warm personal sentiments toward the King and
giving firm assurances that British Near Eastern policy is not inimical to
Saudi Arabia. We suggest that the UK should take advantage of the declaration
of the in early February to the effect that King Ibn Saud was
his "father" and that whatever the King said would be accepted by him for
this places the responsibility on the King for making a "generous settlement
he has so often promised". We suggest also that the British show an early
evidence in the talks of a willingness to compromise: 1) by conceding the
principle of a Saudi Arabian opening on the Persian Gulf east of Qatar; and
2) by conceding or dividing the Manasir tribal area. We also wish the
British to seek to reach the agreement promptly so as to derive the maxi-
mum goodwill from it and to avoid arbitration, if possible, since this would
cause a long delay in the settlement and diminish the goodwill impact of
friendly negotiations. Failing this, however, the Department strongly sup-
ports arbitration as the best possible second course, for we wish to avoid
having the Saudi Arabian Government refer the problem to the UN.
Embassy London is to tell the Foreign Office that we are moved
to make this approach because we fear that non-solution of the problem
might needlessly jeopardize the British position in the Near East to which
we attach great importance; it will add that we hope the Foreign Office will
not construe our purpose as supporting the Saudi Arabian position.
We have instructed our Ambassador in Jidda, however, to inform
Prince Feisal that US has been moved by the earnestness of his and King
Ibn Saud's attitude on this problem and intend to make a serious approach to
the British Government. He will add that our approach is being made out of
our sincere concern for the relations between our two good friends despite
the delicacy always attendant when an outsider becomes involved in a
TOP SECRET SECURITY INF ORMA TION