Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
198247592
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-40DHE 198 WASHINGTON
SECRETARY OF STATE
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6,
By DCB NLT, Date 9-9-85
April 28, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INF FORMA TION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
SOVIET NOTE
At the tripartite discussions in London on the Western
reply to the Soviet note on the German treaty, the British
have put forward a draft reply and requested French and American comment
on it. This draft states that it remains British policy to bring about all-
German elections and to conclude a peace treaty with Germany on terms that
will assure unity with freedom and peace with security. The British Govern-
ment is ready to begin four-power negotiations at the earliest possible date,
but it considers it essential to reach a clear understanding on the scope of
any future conversations and on the fundamental problems to be examined.
The draft states that the UK will not agree to prejudice
Germany¹s right to adhere freely to the peaceful community of European
nations. It does not believe, however, that the creation of a German national
army will contribute to diminishing European tension so long as Germany
is restricted to the narrow confines which were provisionally established
at Potsdam.
The draft asks what the position of an all-German govern-
ment would be between the time of its establishment and the conclusion of
a peace treaty, and states that such a government would have to have liberty
of action both in its internal affairs and in external affairs.
The draft notes with pleasure the expressed willingness
of the Soviets to agree to free all-German elections, but deplores the fact
that they will not admit the UN Commission. It states that the UK is op-
posed to a commission composed merely of representatives of the four
Occupation Powers, but would be willing to consider any other precise
proposal which would permit a really impartial investigation of the pos- -
sibilities of free elections.
IRAN
Embassy Tehran has submitted the following assessment of the
Iranian political situation on the ever of the convocation of the
newly elected Majlis (parliament). Mosadeq finds himself confronted with
the following serious internal difficulties: 1) Critical press and public
opinion; 2) Strong dissention and uncertain continued support from within
SECRET SECURITY INFORMA TION
.