Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
200251431
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2DEPARTMENT OF STATE
VITLE
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
February 15, 1946
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
p.m.
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By DEB NLT, Date 6/13/85
TOP SEGRES
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
AUSTRIA
The British Foreign Office has submitted to the American
and French missions in London memoranda designed to
establish a formula for the treatment of German assets in Austria. The
formula would then be submitted to the Soviet Government. The British
memorandum after outlining background on this case proposes that it be
agreed that measures already taken against German assets in Austria
constitute full satisfaction with respect to reparation on German foreign
assets in Austria. It would also be agreed that further removals as
reparation from Austria would be discontinued but that the Austrian
Government would be required to undertake an examination into the title
of ownership of all German assets remaining in that country and to take
such action thereon as might be required.
ITALY
General Morgan during his political meeting on February 14
announced his decision that military maintenance would be
transferred from Trieste to Venice as of April 1. He denied that serious
repercussions might arise from this decision. The American and British
political representatives protested strongly against this decision and
stated previous objection thereto on the part of the Department of State
and the British Foreign Office. Morgan refused to alter his decision or
to submit the matter to the Combined Chiefs of Staff for prior considera-
tion. Kirk recommends an approach to the Combined Chiefs in order to
obtain a reversal of SAC's decision. The British representative is making
a similar recommendation to the Foreign Office.
During the February 12 meeting of the Deputies on the Council of
Foreign Ministers Dunn suggested that the Italian Government be permitted
to submit further information with respect to the treaty as a whole in
addition to that already submitted on Venezia Giulia and the Tyrol. The
British representative agreed but Gusev asked for deferral of a decision.
During subsequent meeting naval limitation was discussed generally pending
study by experts. Gusev, however, took occasion to reiterate the Soviet
argument that there should be no control body to inspect in view of Italy's
status as cobelligerent and the pledge to support Italy's admission into
UNO.
JAPAN
mop
GEORET