Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
201702655
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT (Naval Aide) 9
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
WASHINGTON
February 7, 1950
0
C
T
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
BELGIUM
Ambassador Murphy in Brussels reports that Belgian official
opinion is "profoundly disappointed and discouraged" over
the results of the recent Paris OEEC meetings, and that public opinion
will probably follow along the lines of the official views. Belgian
officials have stressed to Murphy their belief that the US stand at
Paris was feeble and meek, and that, after a public position of firm-
ness had been taken, Hoffman and Harriman accepted "Cripps dictation"
without a word of protest. In the view of Belgian Foreign Minister Van
Zeeland and Spaak, the US failed to utilize its very strong position,
and they regard such failure as evidence of lack of American conviction
and determination. The Belgians anticipate that the British will con-
tinue to crack the whip during the coming year, exercising the threat of
a sterling bloc boycott to bring pressure to bear on countries like
Belgium and Italy. In the Belgian opinion, funds to be appropriated by
the US Congress will as a consequence make little or no contribution
toward European unification, and the UK will continue to make gestures
of cooperation while endeavoring to continue with US aid its old policy
of "divide and conquer. Murphy points out that such an attitude may
lead Belgium to endeavor to profit as much as possible from the OEEC
while ignoring the larger questions of European unity, and he adds his
agreement with the Belgian opinion that suspension of ECA allocations
to countries which fail to measure up to basic US policies may be worth
trying.
USSR
Embassy Moscow reports that the New York Times despatch
from Moscow which recapitulated the Soviet position on two-
power discussions of atomic energy controls was delayed for 36 hours
before being cleared by the Soviet censor. The Times correspondent
believes that such a long delay indicates that the despatch was given
high-level consideration, and its release suggests that the USSR: 1) has
made no change in its attitude on two-power negotiations; and 2) may
welcome the opportunity to restate its policy with a view to eliciting
current US reactions.
INDIA
Embassy New Delhi reports that any suggestion by the US
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
T 0-P
E
E
T
By DEB
NLT, Date 5-13-85