Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
170103816
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 25,1951.
TRUMAN
Memorandum for :
The President
ARCHIVES AND
From:
Charles
S. Murphy cmn
"NATIONAL RECOROS
:
SERVICE
Subject:
White House Appropriation
Attached are papers setting forth at some length the
situation with respect to the White House appropriation in the
Independent Offices Bill.
I believe that the best approach to this matter would
be for you to call Clarence Cannon and Senator McKellar on the
phone to say that you hope the situation can be straightened out
in conference so far as the White House Office is concerned. I
think you might make the following points:
1.
This is a bad precedent. The practice has always
been for the Congress to appropriate for the White House the
amounts included in the budget, just as it has always been the
practice, on the other hand, for the President to take the
estimates that are submitted by the Legislative Branch for its
own operation and include that in the budget without any change.
I think you will find both Senator McKellar and Mr.
Cannon very sympathetic to this argument. I understand that
Senator McKellar made quite a fight against the Williams amend-
ment on the Senate floor on this ground.
2.
The size of the appropriation is not unreasonable; -
a. A large part of the increase in the White House
Appropriation in recent years is accounted for by the fact that
it is no longer the practice to detail so many employees to the
White House from other agencies.
b.
The increase above last year's appropriation is
due to increased work load resulting from the emergency, although
it represents in part an attempt to provide relief for staff that
has been badly overworked for some time.
C.
The size of the appropriation is relatively
insignificant in the light of the awful responsibilities which
Relations
belongs_to