Ask the Scholar

Page 4 of 7
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 4

OCR

S. RECORDAND ess SERVICE* - 4 - the Lines adopted by the Soviet Umion. This policy it may ba assumed will be consistently advocated by the Russians for all of Germany. Deconpentration and Decartelisation A Deconoentration-deoartelisation law was promulgated for the Bizonal area early in 1947. This program, which is being implemented by the German bisonal authorities under Military Government supervision, has established certain criteria by which excessive concentrations of economic power may be determined. All concerns employing more than 10,000 persons are con- sidered prima facie as excessive concentrations. In addition certain anti-trust standards have been ast up to which German enterprises will have to conform. However, once an enterprise has been cited as being an excessive concentration opportunity will be given to the subject enterprise to show why it should not be deconcentrated, or failing that, it will be given an opportunity to prosent a program which will bring the concern within the law. For two years quadripartite nogotiations were pursued for the purpose of securing a deconcentration program applicable to all of Germany. Failure to agree was occasioned by the position here-to-fare taken by the British. An initial list of firms to be deconcentrated was drawn up with support of the French, Russians, and U.S. and opposed by Great Britain. Another point of disagreement centered around the question of who should have the power of implementation, the British holding that this was a question for the zonal commanders to decide, and the other three powers consistently maintaining

Page data

Page
4
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
cecefb8b9f0d43c8
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
183567973
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "183567973",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567973",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Annex 3 to Council of Foreign Ministers Report 3, Land Reform, Public Ownership and Deconcentration and Decartelization",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567973",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 7,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "183567973",
    "label": "Report, Annex 3 to Council of Foreign Ministers Report 3, Land Reform, Public Ownership and Deconcentration and Decartelization",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567973"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "183567973",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567973",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Annex 3 to Council of Foreign Ministers Report 3, Land Reform, Public Ownership and Deconcentration and Decartelization",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567973",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 7,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567973",
    "naId": 183567973,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "dateQualifier": "ca.",
            "logicalDate": "1947-11-01",
            "month": 11,
            "year": 1947
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 4,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750137/750137-08-04.jpg",
    "mediaId": "cecefb8b9f0d43c8",
    "ocrText": "S.\nRECORDAND\ness SERVICE*\n- 4 -\nthe Lines adopted by the Soviet Umion. This policy it may ba assumed\nwill be consistently advocated by the Russians for all of Germany.\nDeconpentration and Decartelisation\nA Deconoentration-deoartelisation law was promulgated for the Bizonal\narea early in 1947. This program, which is being implemented by the German\nbisonal authorities under Military Government supervision, has established\ncertain criteria by which excessive concentrations of economic power may\nbe determined. All concerns employing more than 10,000 persons are con-\nsidered prima facie as excessive concentrations. In addition certain\nanti-trust standards have been ast up to which German enterprises will\nhave to conform. However, once an enterprise has been cited as being an\nexcessive concentration opportunity will be given to the subject enterprise\nto show why it should not be deconcentrated, or failing that, it will be\ngiven an opportunity to prosent a program which will bring the concern\nwithin the law.\nFor two years quadripartite nogotiations were pursued for the purpose\nof securing a deconcentration program applicable to all of Germany. Failure\nto agree was occasioned by the position here-to-fare taken by the British.\nAn initial list of firms to be deconcentrated was drawn up with support\nof the French, Russians, and U.S. and opposed by Great Britain. Another\npoint of disagreement centered around the question of who should have the\npower of implementation, the British holding that this was a question for\nthe zonal commanders to decide, and the other three powers consistently\nmaintaining"
}