Telegram from Secretary of State Dean Acheson to President Harry S. Truman
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
183568200
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
6-2
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
SECRET
Action
Control:
9108
SS
Rec'd:
September 20 , 1951
FROM: Ottawa
HATIONAL
3:14 a.m.
Info
ARCHIVES SERVICE" AND
RECORDS
DCR
TO:
Secretary of State
NO:
SECTO 25, Sept 19, midnight.
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelinos, March 6, 1982
NIACT.
PROJECT NLT 83-21
BYHC
NLT, Dale 6.29.Ly
FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM SECRETARY.
Council session has been noteworthy for harmony and for
increasing sense cooperation between PC's. While diffi-
culties coordinating fully govt actions twelve sovereign
countries remain great, community spirit developing and US
leadership always recognized as unavoidable is increasingly
accepted. I was especially pleased by comments reps of Den
and Iceland with whom we recently concluded base agreements.
Both expressed full appreciation for manner in which US con-
ducted negotiation and paid homage to democratic sense
equality which US displayed notwithstanding huge discrepancy
size and power of parties.
Ottawa session also significant as first NAC attended by
DEFMINS and FINMINS as well as FONMINS in accordance with
last spring's reorganization of NATO structure. While presence
of so many Mins somewhat delayed proceedings, I believe distinct
benefits will be derived from this personal participation of
three senior Cabinet officials each govt. This should lead
to broader understanding complexity of our security tasks.
There has been minimum speaking for record and all have dis-
played real desire come to grips with problems
It is, of course, too soon fully assess result of session as
only ends tomorrow. In judging results to date you should
bear in mind the objectives which we had set for ourselves
at this session. Primary purpose was obtain favorable action
on admission Greece and Turkey. In addition, we wished pave
way for acceptance by exec branches of NATO govts of solid
military plan at subsequent NAC in Rome. Our third major
objective was reassure our NATO allies increasingly fearful
that US considered NATO only as mil alliance without regard
for econ and SOC realities or cultural matters. This concern
recently enhanced by our pressure for admission Greece and
Turkey, especially latter, which Scandinavian and others were
reluctant to accept as lacking Eur, Christian and democratic
background. While a handicap in this instance, the seriousness
with which
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to