Telegram from Ambassador Henry Grady to Secretary of State Dean Acheson, Number 737
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
218719569
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
copy / OFF
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
18 1 X
TOP OEORET
901
A
Action
Control: 11240
Rec'd: August 22, 1951
NEA
FROM: Tehran
6:25 a.m
Info
TROMAR
s.
TO:
SS
Secretary of State
DECLASSIFIED
RECORDS
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and (D)
G
NO:
737, August 22, Noon.
SERVICE"
EUR
to
D of State letter, Ano
4-11-2
NLT 74.2
E
By NLT. He NARS 9.21.7
DCR
NIACT.
SENT LONDON 163, EYES ONLY AMBASSADOR, RPTD DEPT 737.
FROM HARRIMAN FOR PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY.
NO DISTRIBUTION EXCEPT AS DIRECTED BY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.
Stokes negotiations with Mosadeg are approaching an impasse
with imminent danger negotiations may be broken off. He
appears to be fully resigned this possibility and has taken
very firm line with Mosadeg.
Ultimatum which he handed Mosadeq yesterday to effect he must
have indication by noon today (Wednesday) that Iranian Govt
prepared negotiate on realistic basic or else he will leave
is reported to have created bad impression and is source of
concern Ala and other moderate elements who feel ultimatum
to Iranians are serious tactical error and sound too much
like AIOC tactics. I believe stokes attitude at least some
extent influenced by messages from Brit Govt indicating perhaps
he has gone too far in concessions. While there appears to
be little chance that satisfactory arrangements can be worked
out with Mosadeq it is in my judgment of very great importance
that every effort be made to do so. The 3 principal points
to be settled are (1) purchase of most of oil by Brit interests,
(2) arrangements for operation within Iran which wld enable
retention Brit staff and (3) financial arrangements. Mosadeg
has already yielded on first point and present difficulty
centers largely around second. If Mosadeq shld yield on this
point only third major problem wld remain.
If break in negotiations is inevitable manner in which this occurs
is of great importance. Stokes shld avoid attitudes and
actions which wld permit Mosadeq to place onus of responsibility
upon him. Moreover departure of mission from Tehran shld if
possible be under circumstances that wld permit resumption of
negotiations at some future time without necessity leveloping
new formula or statement new conditions under which this cld
be done. If a more reasonable govt shld evolve, it wld be
much easier for a new PRIMIN to resume talks where Mosadeg
left off
POR OLCRET
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
MESSAGE ES PROHIBITED
Terms
Relations
belongs_to