Telegram from Ambassador Loy Henderson to Secretary of State Dean Acheson
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
229036998
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
5-B-X
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
PLAIN
Action
Control: 13313
NEA
Rec'd: June 30, 1950
FROM: New Delhi
1:03 a.m.
Info
SS
TO:
Secretary of State
G
P
NO:
974, June 29
SAM
FE
NIACT
EUR
UNA
Bajpai Secretary General, Ministry of External Affairs
USUN
has just furnished me with copy of announcement of
OLI
Government of India regarding resolution June 27.
CIA
AAN
The Government of India have viewed with grave concern
IE
the developments in Korea involving, as they do, not only
DCR
civil war but also a threat to world peace. There have
been a number of border incidents between North and South
Korea in the past. But whatever the nature of these
might have been, it appears clear from the information
available to the Government of India that a large scale
invasion of South Korea took place by armed forces of the
North Korean Government. This information was supplied
by a variety of sources, the most authoritative among them
being the United Nation3 Commission on Korea on which
India is represented and which, at the time of invasion,
was in Seoul. In view of this information the Government
of India's permanent delegate to the United Nations and
representative on the Security Council, Shri B.N. Rau,
supported the first resolution of the Security Council
which declared that such aggression had taken place and
called for a cease-fire and withdrawal of the North Korean
forces to the 38th parallel.
"This direction of the Security Council was not acted upon
by the North Korean Government and their forces and the
invasion continued till it threatened the capital city
Seoul itself. The Security Council met again to consider
this rapidly changing situation and passed the second
resolution on Korea on the night of the 27th June New
York time. The Government of India's representative in
the Security Council was unable to participate in the
voting on this second resolution on Korea because he could
not communicate it in time to his government and obtain
their instructions. The operative part of this resolution
'recommends
innational
ARCHITE AND
N
PLAIN
the
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to