Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 82
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT BUREAU OF THE BUDGET 1 .5 WASHINGTON, D.C. APR 191946 My dear Mr. Latta: On April 16, 1946, you advised this office that H.R. 3590, "For the relief of Charles Brown, legal guardian of Lula Mae Brown; Charity Hospital of New Orleans, Louisiana; and Dr. Edward H. Maurer, " had been received at the White House, and requested reports and recommendations as to the approval of the bill. It is the purpose of the bill to pay the sum of $500 to Charles Brown of Albany, La.; the sum of $500 to the legal guardian of Lula Mae Brown, a minor of Albany, La.; the sum of $28 to the Charity Hospital of New Orleans; and to pay the sum of $30 to Dr. Edward Maurer of New Orleans in settlement of their respective claims against the United States on account of personal injuries and medical and hospital expenses incurred when a Navy truck knocked an iron post from its foundation in New Orleans, causing said post to strike Charles Brown and Lula Mae Brown on December 20, 1944. It appears that on the date in question a civlian driver of a Navy vehicle attempted to park it on one of the streets in New Orleans; that the driver backed into an iron post set into the side- walk and knocked it down; that as the post was falling to the side- walk it struck and injured Charles Brown, 32 years of age, and Lula Mae Brown, 7 years of age. Charles Brown sustained a scalp wound for which he was hospitalized nine days, and has subsequently suffered intermittent severe headaches. He was employed at the time as a railroad section laborer at $40 a week and lost 27 days from work by reason of the injuries sustained. He incurred medical and hospital expenses in the amount of $88. Lula Mae Brown sustained an injury to her knee requiring the application of a plastic cast. Medical expenses were incurred on her behalf in the amount of $35. The payments to the Charity Hospital and to Dr. Maurer as proposed by the bill represent items of expense other than those hereinabove referred to. A facsimile of the enrolled enactment has been referred to the Navy Department, and its reply recommending approval of the bill is attached. There appears to be no question but what the accident was due to the negligent manner in which the Government vehicle was being operated.