Ask the Scholar
Page 7 of 18
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
any
Butwhat
program of controls will have its ups and downs, but it has
is been Insportant working, and it will a that succeed. -W are have made moving consider able in th
right director. W The waget Prior ented system we is working
progress, but continued cooperation of all Americans is needed.
are to win the bottle against inflation neededing
In these circumstances the decision of three of the labor representatives
walk off ok for of Jughting inflation
to quit is totall virresponsible. I know that thei position concerning the
4
West Coast longshoremen's settlement did not prevail The Pay Board
means Miscoll
agus
disallowed a 20. 6 percent compensation increase which organized abor
supported but approved a 14. 9 percent increase, even though it was more
than double the general limit which the Board had set.
The West Coast longshoremen's settlement was the only specific
wrong
case referred to in yesterday's statement by the Executive Council of
was
the AFL-CIO, a statement which severely criticized the general pattern
The pay board was right + in mesor
of Pay Board decisions. eneral pattern of decisions/is with
#The
9th Pag one Board
which the labor representatives have largely agreed. Of the 54 Pay Board
decisions to date, labor has agreed in 36 cases - two thirds of the total.
It has disagreed with only 13 decisions or 25 percent. In one case
labor's representatives were split and in four cases they abstained. Over
half of the Pay Board's decisions have been unanimous and, of the eight
decisions which have been the most controversial, labor has agreed with
the outcome in five. When the labor representatives say that this general
pattern is one of "flagrant favoritism," they must recognize that the pattern
is one to which they have generally agreed.
Page data
- Page
- 7
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 485b46de8668c0d1
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 567822113
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "567822113",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/567822113",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Thursday, March 23, 1972, TV Statement re George Meany",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/567822113",
"collections": [
"White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
"President's Personal Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 18,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "567822113",
"label": "Thursday, March 23, 1972, TV Statement re George Meany",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/567822113"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "567822113",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/567822113",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Thursday, March 23, 1972, TV Statement re George Meany",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/567822113",
"collections": [
"White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
"President's Personal Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 18,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/567822113",
"naId": 567822113,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 7,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/595291/Batch0004/074/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01/37-sf-smof-ppf-595291-074-01-007.jpg",
"mediaId": "485b46de8668c0d1",
"ocrText": "any\nButwhat\nprogram of controls will have its ups and downs, but it has\nis been Insportant working, and it will a that succeed. -W are have made moving consider able in th\nright director. W The waget Prior ented system we is working\nprogress, but continued cooperation of all Americans is needed.\nare to win the bottle against inflation neededing\nIn these circumstances the decision of three of the labor representatives\nwalk off ok for of Jughting inflation\nto quit is totall virresponsible. I know that thei position concerning the\n4\nWest Coast longshoremen's settlement did not prevail The Pay Board\nmeans Miscoll\nagus\ndisallowed a 20. 6 percent compensation increase which organized abor\nsupported but approved a 14. 9 percent increase, even though it was more\nthan double the general limit which the Board had set.\nThe West Coast longshoremen's settlement was the only specific\nwrong\ncase referred to in yesterday's statement by the Executive Council of\nwas\nthe AFL-CIO, a statement which severely criticized the general pattern\nThe pay board was right + in mesor\nof Pay Board decisions. eneral pattern of decisions/is with\n#The\n9th Pag one Board\nwhich the labor representatives have largely agreed. Of the 54 Pay Board\ndecisions to date, labor has agreed in 36 cases - two thirds of the total.\nIt has disagreed with only 13 decisions or 25 percent. In one case\nlabor's representatives were split and in four cases they abstained. Over\nhalf of the Pay Board's decisions have been unanimous and, of the eight\ndecisions which have been the most controversial, labor has agreed with\nthe outcome in five. When the labor representatives say that this general\npattern is one of \"flagrant favoritism,\" they must recognize that the pattern\nis one to which they have generally agreed."
}