Ask the Scholar

Page 41 of 53
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 41

OCR

15 Lisagor doesn't see the validity of commending RN's tax payments. "The cold, hard realities of his political predicament overshadow any attempt, however adroit, to make his agreement to pay an act of heroism. It's a wipe-out and it's sad. But who's to blame? 11 Lisagor says trying to blame the preparers is like blaming CRP for W'gate "an interesting diversion, nothing more. [And] before VP and others manage to embed CREEP in mythology of misguided amateurism, one fact should be remembered. It was created, nourished and toilet-trained by WH, and imbued w/ ethics of the place. Its guidance and inspiration came from Oval thru HRH, 11 says Lisagor [so] "who's WH trying to kid about those tax returns." "Still another blow" to RN, led Duke on NET's Wash WkiIn Review. This'll almost certainly bring further political damage to RN. Shanahan of Times on NET said it was mistake to ask Jt. Commin sense that its staff is of the unique, uncowable nature that Cox was. Staff is famed for its industry, care and thoroness. She feels there' be "tremendous cumulative [negative] effect from report which found 5 different categories should' been taxed and 6 different categories were improper deductions. Perhaps RN's not to blame, but how could any responsible accountant get such things as the capital gains wrong? There's no proof, said Shanahan, but she feels there's "tremendous amount of evidence" of knowledge of fraud, especially re: VP papers. At very best, returns were enormously disgraceful" and "slipshod."! Time's MacNeil on NET can't see how Judiciary can ignore fraud probe, but Shanahan said Rodino, despite a distinguished tax lawyer on staff, doesn't plan to look into it. MacNeil added that Spec. Pros. will probably look into fraud possibility. He doesn't see much Hill imp act, however, and suggested public may also be immune to more bad news. Sidey on Agronsky said Tax Comm report showed a "profile of deception [that] seems to almost have been deliberate. 11 RN's returns weren't honest, Sidey asserted. As for IRS saying there's no RN fraud, Sidey/Agronsky noted that's same IRS that congratulated RN on returns last year and now has promoted the fellow who wrote that letter.

Page data

Page
41
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
6a9d8214e45bbab2
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
574792131
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "574792131",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574792131",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "News Summaries - April 1974 [4 of 20]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574792131",
    "collections": [
        "White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "President's Office Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 53,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "574792131",
    "label": "News Summaries - April 1974 [4 of 20]",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574792131"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "574792131",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574792131",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "News Summaries - April 1974 [4 of 20]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574792131",
    "collections": [
        "White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "President's Office Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 53,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574792131",
    "naId": 574792131,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 41,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/068/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-068-11-041.jpg",
    "mediaId": "6a9d8214e45bbab2",
    "ocrText": "15\nLisagor doesn't see the validity of commending RN's tax\npayments. \"The cold, hard realities of his political predicament\novershadow any attempt, however adroit, to make his agreement\nto pay an act of heroism. It's a wipe-out and it's sad.\nBut\nwho's to blame? 11 Lisagor says trying to blame the preparers is\nlike blaming CRP for W'gate \"an interesting diversion, nothing\nmore.\n[And] before VP and others manage to embed CREEP in\nmythology of misguided amateurism, one fact should be remembered.\nIt was created, nourished and toilet-trained by WH, and imbued\nw/ ethics of the place.\nIts guidance and inspiration came from\nOval thru HRH, 11 says Lisagor [so] \"who's WH trying to kid about those\ntax returns.\"\n\"Still another blow\" to RN, led Duke on NET's Wash WkiIn\nReview. This'll almost certainly bring further political damage to\nRN.\nShanahan of Times on NET said it was mistake to ask Jt.\nCommin sense that its staff is of the unique, uncowable nature that\nCox was. Staff is famed for its industry, care and thoroness. She\nfeels there' be \"tremendous cumulative [negative] effect from report\nwhich found 5 different categories should' been taxed and 6 different\ncategories were improper deductions. Perhaps RN's not to blame,\nbut how could any responsible accountant get such things as the\ncapital gains wrong? There's no proof, said Shanahan, but she feels\nthere's \"tremendous amount of evidence\" of knowledge of fraud,\nespecially re: VP papers. At very best, returns were enormously\ndisgraceful\" and \"slipshod.\"!\nTime's MacNeil on NET can't see how Judiciary can ignore\nfraud probe, but Shanahan said Rodino, despite a distinguished tax\nlawyer on staff, doesn't plan to look into it. MacNeil added that\nSpec. Pros. will probably look into fraud possibility. He doesn't see\nmuch Hill imp act, however, and suggested public may also be\nimmune to more bad news.\nSidey on Agronsky said Tax Comm report showed a \"profile of\ndeception [that] seems to almost have been deliberate. 11 RN's returns\nweren't honest, Sidey asserted. As for IRS saying there's no RN\nfraud, Sidey/Agronsky noted that's same IRS that congratulated RN\non returns last year and now has promoted the fellow who wrote that\nletter."
}