Ask the Scholar

Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 1

OCR

Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Roberts, John G.: Files Folder Title: Correspondence, Miscellaneous (05/22/1985-05/31/1985) Box: 14 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 22, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR LINAS KOJELIS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PUBLIC LIAISON FROM: ASSOCIATE COUNSEL 222 TO THE PRESIDENT JOHN G. ROBERTS SUBJECT: Draft Letter You have asked for our views on a draft letter responding to a telegram on the Demjanjuk case. I have no objection to the first paragraph. As you state, the White House must avoid comment on pending Department of Justice prosecutions. With the first sentence of the second paragraph, however, you are buying a pig in a poke. The East European ethnic community has expressed a broad range of concerns about the Office of Special Investigations, and Mr. Buchanan should not state that he shares them all. A minor point: "alleged" is misused in this context. We do not seek to uncover and prosecute "alleged" war criminals; we seek to uncover and prosecute war criminals. The individuals targeted become alleged war criminals. The second sentence of the second paragraph strikes me as committing to too specific a course of action and perhaps raising false hopes of change in OSI on the part of the East European ethnic community. Your correspondent will soon want to know what recommendations were made and whether they will be followed. If the Administration cannot support any such recommendations, you will be in the position of reveal- ing internal disagreement. The following substitute second paragraph avoids these problems: With respect to the more general issues surrounding the U.S. Government effort to uncover and prosecute war criminals, Mr. Buchanan has asked me and other members of his staff to review the complaints and comments we have received from ethnic and civic groups. You may be assured that we will give every appropriate consideration to your views as we conduct this review. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Date: 5/9/85 TO: John Roberts FROM: LINAS KOJELIS Associate Director Office of Public Liaison Room 438 OEOB, Ext. 2741 SUBJECT: Draft letter The attached is for your: Information Review & Comment Direct Response Appropriate Action Draft Letter Signature File Other Please Return By COB Friday, May 10 Comments: DRAFT May 7, 1985 Dear Friends: Pat Buchanan has asked me to reply to your telegram of April 25, 1985 regarding the case of John Demjanjuk and the general con- cerns of the East European-American community and other citizens regarding the mandate of the Office of Special Investigations. Because of Mr. Buchanan's current position on the White House staff, we have been advised that it would be inappropriate for him or any member of his staff to comment on the specific case of Mr. Demjanjuk. As regards the general issue of U.S. government efforts to uncover and prosecute alleged war criminals, you should be aware that Mr. Buchanan continues to share the concerns of citizens such as yourself. He has asked me and other members of his staff to undertake a review of the complaints and comments of interest- ed ethnic and civic groups and prepare appropriate recommenda- tions. Should you have an further questions on this matter, please call me at 456-2741. Sincerely, Linas Kojelis Associate Director Office of Public Liaison DRAFT 1-006642A115 04/25/85 ICS IPMWGWD WSH 01781 04-25 1016A EST PMS WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 1-006244A115 04/25/85 ICS IPMCLOB CLV 02114 CLEVELAND OH 169 04-25 0938A EST PMS HONORABLE PATRICK BUCHANAN ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF U.S.A. WHITE HOUSE, 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. WASHINGTON DC 20500 DEAR PATRICK BUCHANAN: FEDERAL JUDGE FRANK BATTISTI HAS ORDERED THE ILLEGAL EXTRADITION OF JOHN DEMJANJUK TO ISRAEL SCHEDULED FOR MAY 1, 1985. HE HAS ALSO ORDERED THE ARREST OF JOHN DEMJANJUK IN CLEVELAND AND HIS ILLEGAL TRANSFER AWAY FROM HIS FAMILY TO THE STATE OF MISSOURI. WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT THE CASE OF JOHN DEMJANJUK IS ONE OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY. THE SOVIET I.D. CARD USED TO CONVICT JOHN DEMJANJUK WAS PROVEN TO BE A FORGERY. THE O.S.I. HAS DISCREDITED ITSELF IN THE CASES OF WALUS, STEBELSKY, KUNGIS AND OTHERS, AND HAS COLLABORATED WITH K.G.B. BY USING FALSE SOVIET FABRICATED EVIDENCE. WE ASK YOU TO HELP US STOP THIS INJUSTICE AND FREE JOHN DEMJANJUK. ALSO, COULD YOU HELP US ARRANGE A MEETING OF AMERICAN EASTERN EUROPEAN BISHOPS AND LEADERS OF THE ETHNIC COMMUNITIES TO MEET WITH GEORGE SCHULTZ, ED MEESE OR THE PRESIDENT ON THIS URGENT ISSUE. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR EXCELLENT JOURNAL ISM, OBJECTIVE REPORTING AND FOR PRINTING THE TRUTH ABOUT THESE TRIALS. CAUSE COMMITTEE. P.O. BOX 29058 CLEVELAND, OHIO 44129 1013 EST 1023 EST THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 23, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR LINAS KOJELIS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PUBLIC LIAISON FROM: ASSOCIATE COUNSEL JJR TO THE PRESIDENT JOHN G. ROBERTS SUBJECT: Spindulis V. Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee, No. C 504 847 (Cal Ct. App.) As you will see from the attached, I have referred the request from counsel for appellants in the above-referenced case for a 28 U.S.C. $ 517 "Statement of Interest of the United States" to the Legal Adviser at the Department of State for appropriate consideration. You may advise your correspondent of this referral. Attachment THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 23, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR DANIEL MCGOVERN ACTING LEGAL ADVISER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE FROM: ASSOCIATE COUNSEL OBR TO THE PRESIDENT JOHN G. ROBERTS SUBJECT: Spindulis V. Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee, No. C 504 847 (Cal Ct. App.) Counsel for appellants in the above-referenced case have requested that the United States file a "Statement of Interest" in the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517. Such a Statement was filed by the Department of Justice, at the request of the Department of State, in similar litigation arising out of the 1980 Winter Olympics. Counsel for appellants assert that the 1980 Statement is being used against them in litigation and seek a more favorable State- ment to overcome this hurdle. The request is passed along for whatever consideration and direct reply you consider 'appropriate. Mr. Treiman will be advised of this referral. Attachment 309469 ID # CU Dg WHITE HOUSE JL002 CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET o - OUTGOING H . INTERNAL I . INCOMING Date Correspondence Je-direct Received (YY/MM/DD) / Name of Correspondent: / Senas Kojilin MI Mail Report User Codes: (A) (B) (C) Subject: Corresponder from the Baltic american Freedom League ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Completion Action Date of Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DD WHOUND ORIGINATOR 485104102 / / Referral Note: CUAT18 R 85,04,09 585104115 Referral Note: / / / / I Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: ACTION CODES: DISPOSITION CODES: A. Appropriate Action I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary A. Answered C Completed C Comment/Recommendation R. Direct Reply w/Copy B. . Non-Special Referral S Suspended D Draft Response S. For Signature F . Furnish Fact Sheet X Interim Reply to be used as Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE Type of Response = Initials of Signer Code = "A" Completion Date Date of Outgoing Comments: Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files. Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590. 5/81 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 24, 1985 Dear Mrs. Gilbert: Thank you for your letters to the President and First Lady concerning the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In your letters you questioned whether that amendment had been duly ratified. The Secretary of State issued a proclamation declaring that the amendment had been ratified on February 25, 1913. The dates of ratification by the various states may be found in the historical note following the text of the amendment in the United States Code Annotated. I have enclosed a copy of the pertinent page for your information. Numerous court decisions over the years have recognized the validity of the Sixteenth Amendment. I hope the foregoing is helpful. Sincerely, John G. Roberts Associate Counsel to the President Mrs. Evelyn R. Gilbert President, UTNYS 7985 School Street Springwater, NY 14560 INCOME TAX Amend. 16 5. Elections, regulation of for carrying into execution foregoing It is manifest that no power is con- powers, Congress may also control the ferred on Congress by this section to en- registration, but not qualification, of act legislation for the regulation and con- voters in federal elections, since such au- trol of elections generally, nor for secur- thority would be reasonably necessary to ing to citizens of the United States the insure their proper conduct. U. S. V. Mc- right to vote at all elections. U. S. V. Elveen, D.C.La.1959, 177 F.Supp. 355. Miller, D.C.Ind.1901, 107 F. 913. Except as to provisions of this and Nineteenth Amendments concerning right Under federal constitutional authority to vote, the question of suffrage is left to regulate the manner of holding elec- entirely to states. Smith V. Blackwell. tions for federal office and to make all D.C.S.C.1940, 34 F.Supp. 989, affirmed 115 laws which shall be necessary and proper F.2d 186. AMENDMENT XVI.INCOME TAX The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. Historical Note Proposal and ratification. This amend- souri, Mar. 16, 1911; Maine, Mar. 31, 1911; ment was proposed to the legislatures Tennessee, Apr. 7, 1911; Arkansas, Apr. of the several states by the Sixty-First 22, 1911: Wisconsin, May 16, 1911; New Congress, on July 31. 1000, and was de- York, July 12, 1911; Arizona, Apr. 3, 1912: clared. in a proclamation by the Secre- Minnesota, June 11. 1912; Louisiana, June tary of State. dated Feb. 25, 1913, to have 28, 1912; West Virginia, Jan. 31, 1913: been ratified. The dates of ratification Delaware, Feb. 3, 1913; Wyoming, Feb. are as follows: Alabama, Aug. 10, 1909; 3, 1913; New Mexico, Feb. 3, 1913: New Kentucky, Feb. 8, 1910: South Carolina, Jersey, Feb. 4, 1913, and Vermont, Feb. Feb. 19, 1910; Illinois, Mar. 1, 1910; 19, 1913. Mississippi. Mar. 7. 1910; Oklahoma, Mar. 10, 1910; Maryland, Apr. 8, 1910; Geor- Subsequent to the proclamation. this gia, Aug. 8, 1910: Texas, Aug. 16, 1910; amendment was ratified by Massachusetts Ohio, Jan. 19, 1911: Idaho, Jan. 20, 1911; on Mar. 4, 1913 and by New Hampshire on Mar. 7, 1913. Oregon, Jan. 23. 1911; Washington, Jan. 26, 1911; Montana, Jan. 27, 1911; Indiana, The States of Arkansas, Connectient. Jan. 30. 1911; California. Jan. 31, 1911; New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Utali Nevada. Jan. 31. 1911; South Dakota, rejected the amendment, but in later years Feb. 1, 1911; Nebraska. Feb. 9, 1911; Arkansas and New Hampshire ratified it. North Carolina, Feb. 11, 1911: Colorado, See historical notes preceding Amend- Feb. 15, 1911: North Dakota, Feb. 17, ment 1 for the ratification of the other 1911; Michigan. Feb. 23, 1911; Iowa, amendments to this Constitution. Feb. 24, 1911; Kansas, Mar. 2, 1911; Mis- Cross References Income tax, see 26 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. Notes of Decisions I. GENERALLY 1-50 Page 334 II. DEFINITION OF INCOME: INCOME FROM PARTICULAR SOURCES AS TAXABLE 51-74 Page 538 Adoption of amendment 1 Basis for valuation of gift 14 Alimony 54 Cash dividends 59 Allowances and credits 6 Cash or accrual basis, computation of Annuities 55 tax 13 533 JV 1] 320922 ID # CU WHITE HOUSE FIO10'02 CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET o - OUTGOING H INTERNAL I . INCOMING Date Correspondence Received (YY/MM/DD) / / JR-dine Name of Correspondent: Evelyn Dilbert MI Mail Report User Codes: (A) (B) (C) Subject: 16th amendment ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Completion Action Date of Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DD CUHOLL ORIGINATOR 85,05,17 PY / / Referral Note: CUAT18 R 85,05,23 5 85,06,03 Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / I Referral Note: ACTION CODES DISPOSITION CODES: A Appropriate Action I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary A. Answered C Completed C Comment/Recommendation R. Direct Reply w/Copy B. Non-Special Referral S Suspended D - Draft Response S. For Signature F Furnish Fact Sheet X Interim Reply to be used as Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE Type of Response = Initials of Signer Code = "A" Completion Date if Date of Outgoing Comments: Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files. Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590. 5/81 presponse 320922 w UNITED TAXPAYERS OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. MRS. EVELYN R. GILBERT, PRES. 7985 SCHOOL STREET SPRINGWATER. NEW YORK 14560 TEL. 716-669-2848 A.HF Box 216 7985 School Street Springwater, New York 14560 April 29, 1985 Mrs. Nancy Reagan First Lady, United States of America White House Washington, D. C. 20500 Dear First Lady: I recently sent an important letter to your husband asking about how he wanted me to handle a situation--he didn't answer. Maybe he didn't receive the letter. However, I need an answer so I shall explain again. As I am the President of the United Taxpayers of New York State, I am bombarded with materials and questions. One evening a tape by "Red" Beckman was brought to the meeting. In this tape, the people were told that the Sixteenth Amendment makes the law that never was. "Red" explained that he and his friend had been to every state in the Union and studied the passage of the sixteenth. The result was that only four states had passed it legally. My people became very excited. I am at a loss for an answer. I managed this situation for this year. The question remains-- What shall I do in the Future? Sorry to have to bother you. This is a serious situation and deserves the President's answer. Sincerely, Easy Mrs. Evelyn R. Gilbert President, UTNYS ERG:mh THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 24, 1985 Dear Mr. Rusk: Thank you for your letter of May 13 to the President. In that letter you requested, on behalf of Mrs. Hedy Lonero, that the President support Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald's efforts "for a fair, neutral appeal." Please be advised that it would be inappropriate for the President to intervene in any way in this pending case. To maintain public confidence in the impartial enforcement of our laws, the White House adheres strictly to a policy of not interfering in particular criminal prosecutions. I trust you will understand and appreciate the reasons for this position. Sincerely, John Robert John G. Roberts Associate Counsel to the President Mr. Brian D. Rusk 4380 Main Street Amherst, NY 14226 ID# 304345 THE WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET INCOMING DATE RECEIVED: MAY 16, 1985 NAME OF CORRESPONDENT: MR. BRIAN D. RUSK SUBJECT: REQUESTS SUPPORT IN EFFORTS FOR APPEAL OF DR. JEFFREY R. MACDONALD, CONVICTED OF SLAYINGS ACTION DISPOSITION ROUTE TO: ACT DATE TYPE C COMPLETED OFFICE/AGENCY (STAFF NAME) CODE YY/MM/DD RESP D YY/MM/DD LINAS KOJELIS ORG 85/05/16 C85105120" YF REFERRAL NOTF: 23 Cu ATTN: Roberts A#8510512 / / REFERRAL NOTE: / / / / REFERRAL NOTF: / / / / REFERRAL NOTE: / / / / REFERRAL NOTF: COMMENTS: ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENTS: MEDIA:L INDIVIDUAL CODES: PL MAIL USER CODES: (A) (B) (C) *ACTION CODES: *DISPOSITION CODES: *OUTGOING * * * * CORRESPONDENCE: * *A-APPROPRIATE ACTION *A-ANSWERED *TYPE RESP=INITIALS * *C-COMMENT/RECOM *B-NON-SPEC-REFERRAL * OF SIGNER * *D-DRAFT RESPONSE *C-COMPLETED * CODE = A * *F-FURNISH FACT SHEET *S-SUSPENDED *COMPLETED = DATE OF * *I-INFO COPY/NO ACT NFC* * OUTGOING * *R-DIRECT RFPLY W/COPY * * * *S-FOR-SIGNATURE * * * *X-INTERIM REPLY * * * REFER QUESTIONS AND ROUTING UPDATES TO CENTRAL REFERENCE (ROOM 75, OFOB) EXT. 2590 KEEP THIS WORKSHEET ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL INCOMING LETTER AT ALL TIMES AND SEND COMPLETED RECORD TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS, Inc. POLISH NATIONAL OFFICE: WASHINGTON OFFICE: 1944 1200 North Ashland Avenue 1625 I Street, N.W. MCORPORATET Chicago, Illinois 60622 Washington, D.C. 20006 Phone (202) 296-6955 finas Kojelis. Phone (312) 252-5737 PERSONAL May 13, 1985 President Ronald Reagan The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20006 Dear Mr. President: I hope you are well. I have been asked by my dear friend Hedy Lonero to contact you. Mrs. Lonero was a teacher of Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald who was convicted in 1970 for slayings of his pregnant wife* and two young daughters. You are probably familiar with the film "FATAL VISION" con- cerning this case. Hedy Lonero knows MacDonald to be innocent as a former teacher of his. MacDonald maintains that 4 drug crazed intruders killed his family and also attacked him. He is now seeking an appeal in the 4th U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. Could you please support his efforts for a fair, neutral appeal? Hedy Lanero, Dr. MacDonald and I would be most grateful for your efforts. I do hope to see you soon. Kindest regards, Por D. Dent Brian D. Rusk National Director Polish American Congress Local address: 4380 Main Street Amherst, N. Y. 14226 Local phone number: (716) 839-3600 Ext. 209, 295 BDR:rhr Enc. clippings CC: Hedy Lonero P.O. Box 1047 Tryon, N.C. 28782 Dear Brian: May 3,1985 mac Donald - M.D. - - Enclosed find material on Jeffrey - after reading it - I believe you ll arrive at the same conclusion John arrived as - The man appears to he innocent but innocent or guilty he is entitled to a fair trial, and his only hope for that is at the 4th circuit court in Pichmond, Ua, - I'm enclosing Jeff's address in the event you want to conta it him. - Incidents his lawyer is Buan O'neill - many thanks Love - P.S. Happy Birthday! Hedg PII For MacDonald er so: u! From Associated Press And Staff Reports A federal judge on Friday de yet spring nied Jeffrey MacDonald's request SIU for a new trial in the 1970 slay .00 1 ings of his pregnant wife and two late sm u young daughters. U.S. District Judge Franklin Dupree said a second jury 'would ssbl again reach the almost inescapa- ble conclusion that he was respon- sible for these horrible crimes.' He said two confessions from women at various times in the MacDonald Dupree past, which the defense in Janu- ary hearings had contended mer- birchits ited a new trial, were unbeliev- day before "Fatal Vision," a tele- able bris 197612 vision mini-series based on Joe 1 MacDonald is serving three life McGinniss's book about the case, sentences after his 1979 convic- was aired in November tion of murdering his wife, Co- Dupree also said there was lette, and daughters Kimberly and nothing to support the contention Kristen, at their Fort Bragg apart- of MacDonald's attorneys that the ment in February 1970 government suppressed "any evi- Friday, in a telephone interview dence favorable to MacDonald, ei- from a federal prison in Bastrop, ther before, during or after trial.' Tex., MacDonald said Dupree's MacDonald contends one of the decision came as "a body blow intruders thé night of the slayings "I thought that finally reason wore a floppy hat, short skirt and was going to count, and evidence boots. During his bid for a new was going to matter, but it still trial, he said Army investigators doesn't matter in Judge Dupree's obtained what he contended were courtroom," he said. bloody boots but did not keep He said he will appeal the deci- them for evidence. sion to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, which he But Dupree said laboratory believes "is a much more neutral analysis failed to provide any body. link between the boots and the "I think the facts will eventu- MacDonald case, and no blood or ally vindicate me," he said. debris was found from which a MacDonald maintains four comparison could be made to evi- drug-crazed intruders killed his dence gathered from the crime family and attacked him. scene." During a January hearing, his "It was fully what I expected," attorneys said two women, Cathy Colette MacDonald's stepfather, Perry Williams and the late Hel- Freddie Kassab, said Friday. "I ena Stoeckley, had each confessed said he didn't have a chance. All to the killings. that stuff he submitted to the In a 111-page order, Dupree courts wouldn't stand the scru- said "Helena Stoeckley, Cathy tiny Perry Williams and, to a more Kassab said he's waiting for limited extent, Greg Mitchell, Dupree's decision on whether were drawn to the case and have MacDonald will be allowed to contributed to a factual charade keep proceeds from "Fatal Vi- which has allowed it to continue sion. A federal law passed in Oc- for more than a decade and a half. tober prohibits those convicted of Their 'confessions' have been federal crimes from receiving pro- hown to be unbelievable. ceeds from books and movies Williams's confession came the based on their crimes. 4 Arrested After Bogus "ug Deal nts Held THE WASHINGTON POST Saturday, February 19. JACKIANDERSON Cultist Becomes were not admitted as evidence to said, she was beaten up and her in- support the appeal of his conviction. fant son was knocked to the ground. At his trial, Stoeckley had said she South Carolina police officials say Informant, Dies couldn't remember the events of the there was no evidence of foul play in tragic night at Fort Bragg. Stoeckley's death. But Prince Beas- In Her Hideout Later, however, Stoeckley told my ley, a former detective in Fayette- associate Donald Goldberg that ville, N.C., says he believes that she MacDonald was telling the truth may have been murdered. Not long ago, a tragic young She admitted being part of the drug- Beasley had known Stoeckley for woman named Helena Stoeckley oriented cult that committed the 15 years. He even picked her up stepped out of the shadows in hopes killings. She said the motive for the with other cult members the night of saving a man from life in prison murders was the doctor's refusal to after the MacDonald family killings: She told my office a story that supply illicit drugs to the group, But Beasley lacked authority in the brought her nothing but grief and which included soldiers at the base. case, which had taken place on the threats. Last month she was found Describing MacDonald's 1979 military base outside of town. He dead in her hideout apartment in trial, Stoeckley said, "I was afraid held the suspects for Army investi- South Carolina. that I was going to go to prison." So gators for nearly two hours. They Her statements implicated a she claimed that she couldn't re- never showed up, BO Beasley had to witchcraft cult whose members, she member what happened. let the suspects go. said, had threatened her with vio- There was more than fear of pris- Beasley says Stoeckley told him lence. Her story also embarrassed on, though "At the trial I was hit on on several occasions that she was the authorities who may have sent the nose," Stoeckley said. "My nose being threatened by cult members: the wrong man to prison. was broken by one of [the members Shortly before her death, she told Stoeckley was a key witness in the of the cult]. He told me the same him of another member who could murder case against Dr. Jeffrey Mac- thing I've been [warned] the whole corroborate her story. Donald, the Green Beret doctor who time now. He said, 'Keep your "That member has since been lo- is now serving three consecutive life mouth shut' cated and has told Ted Gunderson; sentences for the 1970 murder of his According to Stoeckley, this at- formerly an FBI agent in charge of wife and two young daughters at tack occurred at the hotel where she the Los Angeles office, of involve- Fort Bregg, N.C. was staying during MacDonald's ment in the cult. The informant also What made Stoeckley a crucial trial: *I went out to the ice machine. provided important new information witness was her acknowledged mem- Well, then he followed me upstairs on the ectivities and whereabouts of bership in the cult that she said per- and the next thing I know he just- the cult members. petrated the murders. This corrob- he punched me in the nose and What is frightening, though, is orated Capt. MacDoneld's claim that broke it" that the member of the cult was able a drug-crazed "hippie group" had That wasn't the only time Stoeck- to tell investigators where Stoeckley killed his family and seriously in- ley had been intimidated by mem- was hiding out Obviously, if one jured him. bers of the cult, she said. They member of the cult knew where she Unfortunately for MacDonald, tracked her down last year in a shop- was living, other members might also Stoeckley's post-trial disclosures ping-center parking lot There, she have known. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 24, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW STAFF SECRETARY FROM: ASSOCIATE COUNSEL MR THE PRESIDENT JOHN G. ROBERTS SUBJECT: Nomination for Posthumous Promotion of Major Arthur D. Nicholson, USA Counsel's Office has reviewed the proposed nomination of Major Arthur D. Nicholson for posthumous promotion to lieutenant colonel, and finds no objection to it from a legal perspective. Detailed statutory procedures do exist for normal promotions, but the President retains authority under the Constitution to submit nominations outside those procedures. Precedent for the exercise of this authority may be found in the routine promotion of astronauts after their space flights. In those cases, the constitutional authority is cited. ID #. CU WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET 0 . OUTGOING H INTERNAL I * INCOMING Date Correspondence Received (YY/MM/DD) / / Name of Correspondent: Dave cnew MI Mail Report User Codes: (A) (B) (C) Subject: nomination for Posthumous Promotion of major Arthur D. nicholson, USA ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Completion Action Date of Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DD CUHOLL ORIGINATOR 85,05,23 / / - Referral Note: CUAT 18 R 85,05,23 5 85 05,24 5 85 12N Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / I Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: ACTION CODES DISPOSITION CODES: A Appropriate Action I . Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary A. Answered C Completed C Comment/Recommendation R. Direct Reply w/Copy B. . Non-Special Referral S Suspended D. - Draft Response S. For Signature F . Furnish Fact Sheet X Interim Reply to be used as Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE: Type of Response = Initials of Signer Code = "A" Completion Date - Date of Outgoing Comments: Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files. Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590. 5/81 Document No. WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM DATE: 5/23/84 ACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: NOON TOMORROW 5/24 SUBJECT: NOMINATION FOR POSTHUMOUS PROMOTION OF MAJOR ARTHUR D. NICHOLSON, USA ACTION FYI ACTION FYI VICE PRESIDENT LACY REGAN McFARLANE STOCKMAN OGLESBY BUCHANAN ROLLINS CHAVEZ RYAN CHEW P SS SPEAKES DANIELS SPRINKEL FIELDING SVAHN FRIEDERSDORF TUTTLE HENKEL HICKEY HICKS KINGON REMARKS: Any problems? NSC has no objection. RESPONSE: 1985 MY 23 FII 5: 05 David L. Chew Staff Secretary Ext. 2702 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 21, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Forwarded for your approval and signature is the nomination of Major Arthur D. Nicholson, U.S. Army, for posthumous promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. This nomination has been staffed by the Secretary of the Army and approved by the Secretary of Defense. Recommend you approve and sign the attached. Hickey & EDWARD V. HICKEY, JR. Attachment OF DEFENSE THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (MIFID STATES of AMERICA 16 MAY 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Posthumous Promotion of Major Arthur D. Nicholson I recommend the nomination of Major Arthur D. Nicholson for posthumous promotion to lieutenant colonel using Presidential authority in clause 2, section 2, Article II of the United States Consti- tution. The extraordinary circumstances surrounding the needless death of Major Nicholson at the hands of a Soviet soldier warrant the award of a posthumous promotion. The Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff, United States Army, are in agreement with this nomination. Sapada Enclosure The White House Washington To the Senate of the United States: I nominate -- The following named officer for posthumous promotion in the United States Army in accordance with Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States: ARMY to be lieutenant colonel NICHOLSON, ARTHUR D., JR., 228-62-6589 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 24, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING FROM: JOHN G. ROBERTS DDR SUBJECT: Invitation to David Chew to Participate in Anglo-American Successor Generation Program David Chew has been nominated as a potential participant in the Anglo-American Successor Generation program. The program, sponsored by the Royal Institute of International Affairs and Johns Hopkins University, and funded by the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust, is designed to promote dialogue between the next generation of British and American leaders. Chew is one of 100 nominees; 24 nominees will be selected to go to England October 23-27, 1985, for the program. I see no reason to object to Chew's potential participation in this program. A strong case could be made that he has been invited in his private rather than official capacity, since the selection committee looks to overall accomplish- ments of the individual rather than specific government positions. In any event, the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust, which funds the program, is a 501 (c) (3) organization. Accordingly, even if Chew were considered to be participat- ing in his official capacity, he could accept reimbursement for expenses. Attachment THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 24, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW STAFF SECRETARY FROM: FRED F. FIELDINGOrig. signed by FFF COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Invitation to Participate in Anglo-American Successor Generation Program You have asked for my views on your potential participation in the Anglo-American Successor Generation program, spon- sored by the Royal Institute of International Affairs and Johns Hopkins University, and funded by the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust. I have no objection to your pursuing this opportunity. Should you be selected to participate in the program, you could accept reimbursement of your travel, lodging, and related expenses from the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust. A strong case could be made that your participation in the program would be in your private rather than official capacity, in which case reimbursement would be permissible so long as the usual conflicts standards were not violated. In any event, the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust is a 501 (c) (3) organization, so it may reimburse you for travel, lodging, and related expenses even if you were considered to be participating in your official capacity. Good luck! FFF: JGR:aea 5/24/85 CC: FFFielding JGRoberts Subj Chron THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 24, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW STAFF SECRETARY FROM: FRED F. FIELDING COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Invitation to Participate in Anglo-American Successor Generation Program You have asked for my views on your potential participation in the Anglo-American Successor Generation program, spon- sored by the Royal Institute of International Affairs and Johns Hopkins University, and funded by the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust. I have no objection to your pursuing this opportunity. Should you be selected to participate in the program, you could accept reimbursement of your travel, lodging, and related expenses from the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust. A strong case could be made that your participation in the program would be in your private rather than official capacity, in which case reimbursement would be permissible so long as the usual conflicts standards were not violated. In any event, the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust is a 501 (c) (3) organization, so it may reimburse you for travel, lodging, and related expenses even if you were considered to be participating in your official capacity. Good luck! FFF: JGR:aea 5/24/85 CC: FFFielding JGRoberts Subj Chron 314785 ID # CU Dg WHITE HOUSE FG006-01 CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET o . OUTGOING H - INTERNAL I . INCOMING Date Correspondence Received (YY/MM/DD) / / JR Name of Correspondent: Dave chew MI Mail Report User Codes: (A) (B) (C) Subject: unsalicited Invitation to participate in program & accept expenses ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Completion Action Date of Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code CV YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DD ORIGINATOR 85,05,11 / / Referral Note: CUAT 18 COURT 18 D 85105115 a 58510512 Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / I Referral Note: / / / / I Referral Note: ACTION CODES: DISPOSITION CODES: A Appropriate Action I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary A Answered C Completed C Comment/Recommendation R - Direct Reply w/Copy B. * Non-Special Referral S Suspended D Draft Response S - For Signature F Furnish Fact Sheet X Interim Reply to be used as Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE: Type of Response = Initials of Signer Code = "A" Completion Date = Date of Outgoing Comments: Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files. Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590. 5/81 314785 cn THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 14, 1985 FRED FIELDING: Re: Unsolicited Invitation While we were in Europe, I received the attached unsolicited request that I "apply" for consideration to participate in the Anglo-American Successor Generation Program. From the looks of this it is a week long conference in London sponsored (and I assume paid for) by the Johns Hopkins University and the J. Howard Pew Foundation. I have no idea how or why I got this letter, but I am interested in Counsel's determination if I can: (1) participate; (2) accept expenses for such participation. Please let me know at your earliest convenient, my "applica- tion" must be in by June lst. Thanks. or David L. Chew SAIS Received SS School of Advanced International Studies The Johns Hopkins University 1285 APR 31 AM II: 35 Philip H. Yasinski April 30, 1985 Mr. David Chew Deputy Assistant to the President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. Chew: I am pleased to inform you that the Nominating Committee at The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies has selected you as a potential participant in a series of Anglo-American conferences for the "successor generation. These annual conferences are being sponsored with Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs to promote a more meaningful dialogue between those who will become international leaders in the United States and the United Kingdom. The program is supported by the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust, and operates with the guidance of a steering committee which includes Milton Eisenhower, Senators Mathias and Sarbanes, Ambassador Kingman Brewster, and others. The program is an innovative effort designed to restore dialogue between British and American leaders. The partic- ipants--American and British, aged 28 to 40--are people con- sidered most likely to succeed to positions of authority in their countries. The conferences establish a forum for high-level discussion of major themes in the political, economic, foreign policy and social arenas. The long-term result anticipated is the creation of a pool of talented leaders who have a deeper understanding of the views and aspirations of their counterparts and who can be counted on to manage the Anglo-American part- nership with heightened sensitivity and competence. The Committee is one of 21 regional committees that have reviewed the accomplishments of many possible nominees throughout the nation. You are regarded by leaders in this country as representing the new generation of men and women who will manage 1740 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 785-6844 Telex SAISJHU 64322 Mr. David Chew April 30, 1985 Page two global affairs in the early 21st century. Approximately 100 nominees have been designated nationwide; you are drawn from a variety of disciplines: industry, business and banking, law, labor, education, communications, politics, science, and the arts. The selection committee will meet in June to select leaders in these fields who have pioneered developments, excelled in management or the application of technology, or demonstrated exceptional ability to influence contemporary issues. Those selected will be invited to meet with their British counterparts in Oxfordshire, October 23 to 27, 1985. Please provide the information requested on the enclosed Candidate Profile form as soon as possible; you may supplement the profile with a prepared resume or vita. To ensure that you receive the selection committee's full consideration, please return your profile by June 1. You will be notified of final selections by Monday, July 15, 1985. It is indeed an honor to have been nominated for this exceptional program. Twenty-four Americans will be selected to participate, though each nominee is already recognized as a qualified spokesman for the national interest whose insight and innovation will contribute to a deeper, long-term understanding between the United States and Britain. Sincerely, Philip H. Yasinski PHY/jb CC: Dr. Richard L. Lesher Dean George R. Packard Enclosure THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 30, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING FROM: JOHN G. ROBERTS 820L SUBJECT: Request for the President to Provide a 30-Second Introduction for Osmond Family 25th Anniversary Special Senator Jake Garn has asked the President to do a thirty- second videotape spot to introduce a two-hour Osmond Family 25th anniversary television special. B. Oglesby channeled the request to Fred Ryan. I recommend against the President providing a videotape or any other type of message for use in the television program. This is of course a for-profit, commercial activity, and the President should not participate in it. Exceptions to the general policy against such participation have been made (tossing the coin for the Super Bowl telecast, the "This is Your Life" participation discussed at this morning's staff meeting), but I see no reason for an exception in this case. Attachment THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 30, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR FREDERICK J. RYAN, JR. DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT DIRECTOR, PRESIDENTIAL SCHEDULING FROM: FRED F. FIELDING Orig. signed by FFF COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Request for the President to Provide a 30-Second Introduction for Osmond Family 25th Anniversary Special Senator Jake Garn has requested that the President provide a thirty-second videotape spot to be used to introduce a two-hour Osmond Family 25th anniversary television special. The television special is of course a commercial, for-profit activity. Established White House policy generally pre- cludes participation by the President in such activities, and I see no reason to depart from that policy in this instance. A Presidential message introducing the special would certainly be resented by the competing networks, and justifiably so. CC: M.B. Oglesby FFF:JGR:aea 5/30/85 bcc: FFFielding JGRoberts Subj Chron THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 30, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR FREDERICK J. RYAN, JR. DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT DIRECTOR, PRESIDENTIAL SCHEDULING FROM: FRED F. FIELDING COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Request for the President to Provide a 30-Second Introduction for Osmond Family 25th Anniversary Special Senator Jake Garn has requested that the President provide a thirty-second videotape spot to be used to introduce a two-hour Osmond Family 25th anniversary television special. The television special is of course a commercial, for-profit activity. Established White House policy generally pre- cludes participation by the President in such activities, and I see no reason to depart from that policy in this instance. A Presidential message introducing the special would certainly be resented by the competing networks, and justifiably SO. CC: M.B. Oglesby FFF: JGR:aea 5/30/85 bcc: FFFielding JGRoberts Subj Chron ID # CU WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET o - OUTGOING H INTERNAL I - INCOMING Date Correspondence Received (YY/MM/DD) / / Name of Correspondent: JAKe Garn MI Mail Report User Codes: (A) (B) (C) Subject: Requests POTUS to provide 30 second introduction for Osmond family 25th anniversary Special ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Completion Action Date of Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DD ORIGINATOR 85,05,29 / / Referral Note: CUAT 18 85,05,29 5/85/05/30 5 - Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / - - Referral Note: / : / / / I Referral Note: ACTION CODES DISPOSITION CODES: A Appropriate Action I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary A Answered C Completed C Comment/Recommendation R. Direct Reply w/Copy B Non Special Referral S Suspended D Dratt Response S. For Signature F Furnish Fact Sheet X- Interim Reply to be used 85 Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE Type of Response = initials of Signer Code "A" Completion Date - Date of Outgoing Comments: Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files. Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590. 5/81 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 29, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR: FRED RYAN FROM: M. B. OGLESBY SUBJECT: Taped Message We received this request late this afternoon from Senator Jake Garn. The Senator is asking the President to provide a 30 second introduction to a two-hour Osmond Family 25th anniversary television special. Although the program will air sometime in July, the taping session is scheduled for Monday, June x3 The Senator's office would like to know by this Friday whether the President will be able to accommodate this request. Please let me know what to advise Senator Garn. CC: Fren Fulding Please fost track! Thanks United States Senate MEMORANDUM 5-29-85 Pam The Osmond Family Studio is anxious to know today or tomorrow if the President is able to do this for them. I would appreciate it if you would let me know. Thanks uptrupports Greg Korologos 2241344 COMMITTEES: APPROPRIATIONS UTAH BANKING. HOUSING AND SD 505 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING URBAN AFFAIRS TELEPHONE 202-224-5444 United States Senate INTELLIGENCE JEFF M. BINGHAM WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT May 29, 1985 President Ronald Reagan The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Reagan: The Osmond Family from Utah are producing their 25th anniversary television special. This two-hour special will air internationally sonetime in July. I would like to encourage you to open the show with a thirty second spot. Enclosed is the script that is being suggested. The Osmond family really wants you for the special and I hope that you are willing and have the time to do this for them. They will be taping on Monday, June 3rd. The Osmond Foundation is located at 93 West 3300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84115. (801) 486-4824. Jake Sincerely, Garn darn enc. THROUGH THE YEARS: THE OSMOND'S 25TH ANNIVERSARY 1) (PRESIDENT REAGAN CAMEO - :30) ANNOUNCER (V.O.) Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States PRESIDENT REAGAN Good evening. It gives me great pleasure to congratulate The Osmonds on the occasion of their 25th anniversary in show business. Nancy and I have long been fans and admirers of this most talented musical family. Like you, we've watched them grow up before our very eyes, and tonight Alan, WAYNE Merrill, Jay, - Donny, Marie and Jimmy on behalf of your fans everywhere we'd like to thank you for all the entertainment and laughter and music you've given us through the years. (INTO: OPENING VIDEO MONTAGE)

Page data

Page
1
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
f129ee6361707c8a
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
118567976
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "118567976",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567976",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Correspondence, Miscellaneous (05/22/1985-05/31/1985)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567976",
    "identifierLocal": "485",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)",
        "John Roberts' Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "118567976",
    "label": "Correspondence, Miscellaneous (05/22/1985-05/31/1985)",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567976"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "118567976",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567976",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Correspondence, Miscellaneous (05/22/1985-05/31/1985)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567976",
    "identifierLocal": "485",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)",
        "John Roberts' Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567976",
    "naId": 118567976,
    "coverageEndDate": {
        "logicalDate": "1986-12-31",
        "year": 1986
    },
    "coverageStartDate": {
        "logicalDate": "1982-01-01",
        "year": 1982
    },
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-014-010-2017.pdf",
    "mediaId": "f129ee6361707c8a",
    "ocrText": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Library\nDigital Library Collections\nThis is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.\nCollection: Roberts, John G.: Files\nFolder Title: Correspondence, Miscellaneous\n(05/22/1985-05/31/1985)\nBox: 14\nTo see more digitized collections visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library\nTo see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection\nContact a reference archivist at: [email protected]\nCitation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing\nNational Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 22, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR LINAS KOJELIS\nASSOCIATE DIRECTOR\nOFFICE OF PUBLIC LIAISON\nFROM:\nASSOCIATE COUNSEL 222 TO THE PRESIDENT\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\nSUBJECT:\nDraft Letter\nYou have asked for our views on a draft letter responding to\na telegram on the Demjanjuk case. I have no objection to\nthe first paragraph. As you state, the White House must\navoid comment on pending Department of Justice prosecutions.\nWith the first sentence of the second paragraph, however,\nyou are buying a pig in a poke. The East European ethnic\ncommunity has expressed a broad range of concerns about the\nOffice of Special Investigations, and Mr. Buchanan should\nnot state that he shares them all. A minor point: \"alleged\"\nis misused in this context. We do not seek to uncover and\nprosecute \"alleged\" war criminals; we seek to uncover and\nprosecute war criminals. The individuals targeted become\nalleged war criminals.\nThe second sentence of the second paragraph strikes me as\ncommitting to too specific a course of action and perhaps\nraising false hopes of change in OSI on the part of the East\nEuropean ethnic community. Your correspondent will soon\nwant to know what recommendations were made and whether they\nwill be followed. If the Administration cannot support any\nsuch recommendations, you will be in the position of reveal-\ning internal disagreement.\nThe following substitute second paragraph avoids these\nproblems:\nWith respect to the more general issues\nsurrounding the U.S. Government effort\nto uncover and prosecute war criminals,\nMr. Buchanan has asked me and other\nmembers of his staff to review the\ncomplaints and comments we have\nreceived from ethnic and civic groups.\nYou may be assured that we will give\nevery appropriate consideration to your\nviews as we conduct this review.\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nDate: 5/9/85\nTO:\nJohn Roberts\nFROM:\nLINAS KOJELIS\nAssociate Director\nOffice of Public Liaison\nRoom 438 OEOB, Ext. 2741\nSUBJECT:\nDraft letter\nThe attached is for your:\nInformation\nReview & Comment\nDirect Response\nAppropriate Action\nDraft Letter\nSignature\nFile\nOther\nPlease Return By COB Friday, May 10\nComments:\nDRAFT\nMay 7, 1985\nDear Friends:\nPat Buchanan has asked me to reply to your telegram of April 25,\n1985 regarding the case of John Demjanjuk and the general con-\ncerns of the East European-American community and other citizens\nregarding the mandate of the Office of Special Investigations.\nBecause of Mr. Buchanan's current position on the White House\nstaff, we have been advised that it would be inappropriate for\nhim or any member of his staff to comment on the specific case of\nMr. Demjanjuk.\nAs regards the general issue of U.S. government efforts to\nuncover and prosecute alleged war criminals, you should be aware\nthat Mr. Buchanan continues to share the concerns of citizens\nsuch as yourself. He has asked me and other members of his staff\nto undertake a review of the complaints and comments of interest-\ned ethnic and civic groups and prepare appropriate recommenda-\ntions.\nShould you have an further questions on this matter, please call\nme at 456-2741.\nSincerely,\nLinas Kojelis\nAssociate Director\nOffice of Public Liaison\nDRAFT\n1-006642A115 04/25/85\nICS IPMWGWD WSH\n01781 04-25 1016A EST\nPMS WHITE HOUSE DC 20500\n1-006244A115 04/25/85\nICS IPMCLOB CLV\n02114 CLEVELAND OH 169 04-25 0938A EST\nPMS HONORABLE PATRICK BUCHANAN\nASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF U.S.A.\nWHITE HOUSE, 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.\nWASHINGTON DC 20500\nDEAR PATRICK BUCHANAN:\nFEDERAL JUDGE FRANK BATTISTI HAS ORDERED THE ILLEGAL EXTRADITION\nOF JOHN DEMJANJUK TO ISRAEL SCHEDULED FOR MAY 1, 1985. HE HAS ALSO\nORDERED THE ARREST OF JOHN DEMJANJUK IN CLEVELAND AND HIS ILLEGAL\nTRANSFER AWAY FROM HIS FAMILY TO THE STATE OF MISSOURI. WE STRONGLY\nFEEL THAT THE CASE OF JOHN DEMJANJUK IS ONE OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY.\nTHE SOVIET I.D. CARD USED TO CONVICT JOHN DEMJANJUK WAS PROVEN\nTO BE A FORGERY. THE O.S.I. HAS DISCREDITED ITSELF IN THE CASES OF\nWALUS, STEBELSKY, KUNGIS AND OTHERS, AND HAS COLLABORATED WITH\nK.G.B. BY USING FALSE SOVIET FABRICATED EVIDENCE.\nWE ASK YOU TO HELP US STOP THIS INJUSTICE AND FREE JOHN\nDEMJANJUK.\nALSO, COULD YOU HELP US ARRANGE A MEETING OF AMERICAN EASTERN\nEUROPEAN BISHOPS AND LEADERS OF THE ETHNIC COMMUNITIES TO MEET WITH\nGEORGE SCHULTZ, ED MEESE OR THE PRESIDENT ON THIS URGENT ISSUE.\nWE THANK YOU FOR YOUR EXCELLENT JOURNAL ISM, OBJECTIVE REPORTING\nAND FOR PRINTING THE TRUTH ABOUT THESE TRIALS.\nCAUSE COMMITTEE.\nP.O. BOX 29058\nCLEVELAND, OHIO 44129\n1013 EST\n1023 EST\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 23, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR LINAS KOJELIS\nASSOCIATE DIRECTOR\nOFFICE OF PUBLIC LIAISON\nFROM:\nASSOCIATE COUNSEL JJR TO THE PRESIDENT\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\nSUBJECT:\nSpindulis V. Los Angeles Olympic Organizing\nCommittee, No. C 504 847 (Cal Ct. App.)\nAs you will see from the attached, I have referred the\nrequest from counsel for appellants in the above-referenced\ncase for a 28 U.S.C. $ 517 \"Statement of Interest of the\nUnited States\" to the Legal Adviser at the Department of\nState for appropriate consideration. You may advise your\ncorrespondent of this referral.\nAttachment\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 23, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR DANIEL MCGOVERN\nACTING LEGAL ADVISER\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE\nFROM:\nASSOCIATE COUNSEL OBR TO THE PRESIDENT\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\nSUBJECT:\nSpindulis V. Los Angeles Olympic Organizing\nCommittee, No. C 504 847 (Cal Ct. App.)\nCounsel for appellants in the above-referenced case have\nrequested that the United States file a \"Statement of\nInterest\" in the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517. Such a\nStatement was filed by the Department of Justice, at the\nrequest of the Department of State, in similar litigation\narising out of the 1980 Winter Olympics. Counsel for\nappellants assert that the 1980 Statement is being used\nagainst them in litigation and seek a more favorable State-\nment to overcome this hurdle. The request is passed along\nfor whatever consideration and direct reply you consider\n'appropriate. Mr. Treiman will be advised of this referral.\nAttachment\n309469\nID #\nCU\nDg\nWHITE HOUSE\nJL002\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no - OUTGOING\nH . INTERNAL\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nJe-direct\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\nName of Correspondent:\n/ Senas Kojilin\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject: Corresponder from the Baltic\namerican Freedom League\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nWHOUND\nORIGINATOR 485104102\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nCUAT18\nR 85,04,09\n585104115\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nI\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA. Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA. Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB. . Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS. For Signature\nF . Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 24, 1985\nDear Mrs. Gilbert:\nThank you for your letters to the President and First Lady\nconcerning the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States\nConstitution. In your letters you questioned whether that\namendment had been duly ratified.\nThe Secretary of State issued a proclamation declaring that\nthe amendment had been ratified on February 25, 1913. The\ndates of ratification by the various states may be found in\nthe historical note following the text of the amendment in\nthe United States Code Annotated. I have enclosed a copy of\nthe pertinent page for your information. Numerous court\ndecisions over the years have recognized the validity of the\nSixteenth Amendment.\nI hope the foregoing is helpful.\nSincerely,\nJohn G. Roberts\nAssociate Counsel to the President\nMrs. Evelyn R. Gilbert\nPresident, UTNYS\n7985 School Street\nSpringwater, NY 14560\nINCOME TAX\nAmend. 16\n5. Elections, regulation of\nfor carrying into execution foregoing\nIt is manifest that no power is con-\npowers, Congress may also control the\nferred on Congress by this section to en-\nregistration, but not qualification, of\nact legislation for the regulation and con-\nvoters in federal elections, since such au-\ntrol of elections generally, nor for secur-\nthority would be reasonably necessary to\ning to citizens of the United States the\ninsure their proper conduct. U. S. V. Mc-\nright to vote at all elections. U. S. V.\nElveen, D.C.La.1959, 177 F.Supp. 355.\nMiller, D.C.Ind.1901, 107 F. 913.\nExcept as to provisions of this and\nNineteenth Amendments concerning right\nUnder federal constitutional authority\nto vote, the question of suffrage is left\nto regulate the manner of holding elec-\nentirely to states. Smith V. Blackwell.\ntions for federal office and to make all\nD.C.S.C.1940, 34 F.Supp. 989, affirmed 115\nlaws which shall be necessary and proper\nF.2d 186.\nAMENDMENT XVI.INCOME TAX\nThe Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes,\nfrom whatever source derived, without apportionment among the\nseveral States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.\nHistorical Note\nProposal and ratification. This amend-\nsouri, Mar. 16, 1911; Maine, Mar. 31, 1911;\nment was proposed to the legislatures\nTennessee, Apr. 7, 1911; Arkansas, Apr.\nof the several states by the Sixty-First\n22, 1911: Wisconsin, May 16, 1911; New\nCongress, on July 31. 1000, and was de-\nYork, July 12, 1911; Arizona, Apr. 3, 1912:\nclared. in a proclamation by the Secre-\nMinnesota, June 11. 1912; Louisiana, June\ntary of State. dated Feb. 25, 1913, to have\n28, 1912; West Virginia, Jan. 31, 1913:\nbeen ratified. The dates of ratification\nDelaware, Feb. 3, 1913; Wyoming, Feb.\nare as follows: Alabama, Aug. 10, 1909;\n3, 1913; New Mexico, Feb. 3, 1913: New\nKentucky, Feb. 8, 1910: South Carolina,\nJersey, Feb. 4, 1913, and Vermont, Feb.\nFeb. 19, 1910; Illinois, Mar. 1, 1910;\n19, 1913.\nMississippi. Mar. 7. 1910; Oklahoma, Mar.\n10, 1910; Maryland, Apr. 8, 1910; Geor-\nSubsequent to the proclamation. this\ngia, Aug. 8, 1910: Texas, Aug. 16, 1910;\namendment was ratified by Massachusetts\nOhio, Jan. 19, 1911: Idaho, Jan. 20, 1911;\non Mar. 4, 1913 and by New Hampshire\non Mar. 7, 1913.\nOregon, Jan. 23. 1911; Washington, Jan.\n26, 1911; Montana, Jan. 27, 1911; Indiana,\nThe States of Arkansas, Connectient.\nJan. 30. 1911; California. Jan. 31, 1911;\nNew Hampshire, Rhode Island and Utali\nNevada. Jan. 31. 1911; South Dakota,\nrejected the amendment, but in later years\nFeb. 1, 1911; Nebraska. Feb. 9, 1911;\nArkansas and New Hampshire ratified it.\nNorth Carolina, Feb. 11, 1911: Colorado,\nSee historical notes preceding Amend-\nFeb. 15, 1911: North Dakota, Feb. 17,\nment 1 for the ratification of the other\n1911; Michigan. Feb. 23, 1911; Iowa,\namendments to this Constitution.\nFeb. 24, 1911; Kansas, Mar. 2, 1911; Mis-\nCross References\nIncome tax, see 26 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.\nNotes of Decisions\nI. GENERALLY 1-50\nPage 334\nII. DEFINITION OF INCOME: INCOME FROM PARTICULAR SOURCES\nAS TAXABLE 51-74\nPage 538\nAdoption of amendment 1\nBasis for valuation of gift 14\nAlimony 54\nCash dividends 59\nAllowances and credits 6\nCash or accrual basis, computation of\nAnnuities 55\ntax 13\n533\nJV 1]\n320922\nID #\nCU\nWHITE HOUSE\nFIO10'02\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no - OUTGOING\nH INTERNAL\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nJR-dine\nName of Correspondent: Evelyn Dilbert\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject:\n16th amendment\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nCUHOLL\nORIGINATOR\n85,05,17 PY\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nCUAT18\nR\n85,05,23\n5 85,06,03\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nI\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA. Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB. Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD - Draft Response\nS. For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date if Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\npresponse\n320922\nw\nUNITED TAXPAYERS OF NEW YORK STATE, INC.\nMRS. EVELYN R. GILBERT, PRES.\n7985 SCHOOL STREET\nSPRINGWATER. NEW YORK 14560\nTEL. 716-669-2848\nA.HF\nBox 216\n7985 School Street\nSpringwater, New York\n14560\nApril 29, 1985\nMrs. Nancy Reagan\nFirst Lady, United States of America\nWhite House\nWashington, D. C. 20500\nDear First Lady:\nI recently sent an important letter to your husband asking\nabout how he wanted me to handle a situation--he didn't answer.\nMaybe he didn't receive the letter. However, I need an answer\nso I shall explain again.\nAs I am the President of the United Taxpayers of New York\nState, I am bombarded with materials and questions. One evening\na tape by \"Red\" Beckman was brought to the meeting. In this tape,\nthe people were told that the Sixteenth Amendment makes the law\nthat never was. \"Red\" explained that he and his friend had been\nto every state in the Union and studied the passage of the sixteenth.\nThe result was that only four states had passed it legally.\nMy people became very excited. I am at a loss for an answer.\nI managed this situation for this year. The question remains--\nWhat shall I do in the Future?\nSorry to have to bother you. This is a serious situation\nand deserves the President's answer.\nSincerely,\nEasy\nMrs. Evelyn R. Gilbert\nPresident, UTNYS\nERG:mh\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 24, 1985\nDear Mr. Rusk:\nThank you for your letter of May 13 to the President. In\nthat letter you requested, on behalf of Mrs. Hedy Lonero,\nthat the President support Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald's\nefforts \"for a fair, neutral appeal.\"\nPlease be advised that it would be inappropriate for the\nPresident to intervene in any way in this pending case. To\nmaintain public confidence in the impartial enforcement of\nour laws, the White House adheres strictly to a policy of\nnot interfering in particular criminal prosecutions. I\ntrust you will understand and appreciate the reasons for\nthis position.\nSincerely,\nJohn Robert\nJohn G. Roberts\nAssociate Counsel to the President\nMr. Brian D. Rusk\n4380 Main Street\nAmherst, NY 14226\nID# 304345\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\nINCOMING\nDATE RECEIVED: MAY 16, 1985\nNAME OF CORRESPONDENT: MR. BRIAN D. RUSK\nSUBJECT: REQUESTS SUPPORT IN EFFORTS FOR APPEAL OF DR.\nJEFFREY R. MACDONALD, CONVICTED OF SLAYINGS\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nROUTE TO:\nACT\nDATE\nTYPE C COMPLETED\nOFFICE/AGENCY (STAFF NAME)\nCODE YY/MM/DD\nRESP D YY/MM/DD\nLINAS KOJELIS\nORG 85/05/16\nC85105120\"\nYF\nREFERRAL NOTF:\n23\nCu ATTN: Roberts\nA#8510512\n/ /\nREFERRAL NOTE:\n/ /\n/ /\nREFERRAL NOTF:\n/ /\n/ /\nREFERRAL NOTE:\n/ /\n/ /\nREFERRAL NOTF:\nCOMMENTS:\nADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENTS:\nMEDIA:L INDIVIDUAL CODES:\nPL MAIL\nUSER CODES: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\n*ACTION CODES:\n*DISPOSITION CODES:\n*OUTGOING\n*\n*\n*\n* CORRESPONDENCE:\n*\n*A-APPROPRIATE ACTION\n*A-ANSWERED\n*TYPE RESP=INITIALS\n*\n*C-COMMENT/RECOM\n*B-NON-SPEC-REFERRAL\n*\nOF SIGNER *\n*D-DRAFT RESPONSE\n*C-COMPLETED\n*\nCODE = A\n*\n*F-FURNISH FACT SHEET\n*S-SUSPENDED\n*COMPLETED = DATE OF\n*\n*I-INFO COPY/NO ACT NFC*\n*\nOUTGOING *\n*R-DIRECT RFPLY W/COPY *\n*\n*\n*S-FOR-SIGNATURE\n*\n*\n*\n*X-INTERIM REPLY\n*\n*\n*\nREFER QUESTIONS AND ROUTING UPDATES TO CENTRAL REFERENCE\n(ROOM 75, OFOB) EXT. 2590\nKEEP THIS WORKSHEET ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL INCOMING\nLETTER AT ALL TIMES AND SEND COMPLETED RECORD TO RECORDS\nMANAGEMENT.\nPOLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS, Inc.\nPOLISH\nNATIONAL OFFICE:\nWASHINGTON OFFICE:\n1944\n1200 North Ashland Avenue\n1625 I Street, N.W.\nMCORPORATET\nChicago, Illinois 60622\nWashington, D.C. 20006\nPhone (202) 296-6955\nfinas Kojelis.\nPhone (312) 252-5737\nPERSONAL\nMay 13, 1985\nPresident Ronald Reagan\nThe White House\n1600 Pennsylvania Avenue\nWashington, D.C. 20006\nDear Mr. President:\nI hope you are well. I have been asked by my dear friend Hedy Lonero\nto contact you. Mrs. Lonero was a teacher of Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald who\nwas convicted in 1970 for slayings of his pregnant wife* and two young\ndaughters. You are probably familiar with the film \"FATAL VISION\" con-\ncerning this case.\nHedy Lonero knows MacDonald to be innocent as a former teacher of his.\nMacDonald maintains that 4 drug crazed intruders killed his family and also\nattacked him. He is now seeking an appeal in the 4th U.S. Court of Appeals\nin Richmond, Virginia. Could you please support his efforts for a fair,\nneutral appeal?\nHedy Lanero, Dr. MacDonald and I would be most grateful for your\nefforts. I do hope to see you soon.\nKindest regards,\nPor D. Dent\nBrian D. Rusk\nNational Director\nPolish American Congress\nLocal address: 4380 Main Street\nAmherst, N. Y. 14226\nLocal phone number: (716) 839-3600 Ext. 209, 295\nBDR:rhr\nEnc. clippings\nCC: Hedy Lonero\nP.O. Box 1047\nTryon, N.C. 28782\nDear Brian:\nMay 3,1985\nmac Donald - M.D. -\n- Enclosed find material on Jeffrey\n- after reading it - I believe\nyou ll arrive at the same conclusion\nJohn arrived as - The man appears\nto he innocent but innocent or\nguilty he is entitled to a fair trial,\nand his only hope for that is at\nthe 4th circuit court in Pichmond, Ua,\n- I'm enclosing Jeff's address\nin the event you want to conta it\nhim. - Incidents his lawyer is\nBuan O'neill\n- many thanks Love -\nP.S. Happy Birthday! Hedg\nPII\nFor MacDonald\ner\nso:\nu!\nFrom Associated Press\nAnd Staff Reports\nA federal judge on Friday de\nyet\nspring\nnied Jeffrey MacDonald's request\nSIU\nfor a new trial in the 1970 slay\n.00 1\nings of his pregnant wife and two\nlate\nsm u\nyoung daughters.\nU.S. District Judge Franklin\nDupree said a second jury 'would\nssbl\nagain reach the almost inescapa-\nble conclusion that he was respon-\nsible for these horrible crimes.'\nHe said two confessions from\nwomen at various times in the\nMacDonald Dupree\npast, which the defense in Janu-\nary hearings had contended mer-\nbirchits\nited a new trial, were unbeliev-\nday before \"Fatal Vision,\" a tele-\nable\nbris\n197612\nvision mini-series based on Joe\n1 MacDonald is serving three life\nMcGinniss's book about the case,\nsentences after his 1979 convic-\nwas aired in November\ntion of murdering his wife, Co-\nDupree also said there was\nlette, and daughters Kimberly and\nnothing to support the contention\nKristen, at their Fort Bragg apart-\nof MacDonald's attorneys that the\nment in February 1970\ngovernment suppressed \"any evi-\nFriday, in a telephone interview\ndence favorable to MacDonald, ei-\nfrom a federal prison in Bastrop,\nther before, during or after trial.'\nTex., MacDonald said Dupree's\nMacDonald contends one of the\ndecision came as \"a body blow\nintruders thé night of the slayings\n\"I thought that finally reason\nwore a floppy hat, short skirt and\nwas going to count, and evidence\nboots. During his bid for a new\nwas going to matter, but it still\ntrial, he said Army investigators\ndoesn't matter in Judge Dupree's\nobtained what he contended were\ncourtroom,\" he said.\nbloody boots but did not keep\nHe said he will appeal the deci-\nthem for evidence.\nsion to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court\nof Appeals in Richmond, which he\nBut Dupree said laboratory\nbelieves \"is a much more neutral\nanalysis failed to provide any\nbody.\nlink between the boots and the\n\"I think the facts will eventu-\nMacDonald case, and no blood or\nally vindicate me,\" he said.\ndebris was found from which a\nMacDonald maintains four\ncomparison could be made to evi-\ndrug-crazed intruders killed his\ndence gathered from the crime\nfamily and attacked him.\nscene.\"\nDuring a January hearing, his\n\"It was fully what I expected,\"\nattorneys said two women, Cathy\nColette MacDonald's stepfather,\nPerry Williams and the late Hel-\nFreddie Kassab, said Friday. \"I\nena Stoeckley, had each confessed\nsaid he didn't have a chance. All\nto the killings.\nthat stuff he submitted to the\nIn a 111-page order, Dupree\ncourts wouldn't stand the scru-\nsaid \"Helena Stoeckley, Cathy\ntiny\nPerry Williams and, to a more\nKassab said he's waiting for\nlimited extent, Greg Mitchell,\nDupree's decision on whether\nwere drawn to the case and have\nMacDonald will be allowed to\ncontributed to a factual charade\nkeep proceeds from \"Fatal Vi-\nwhich has allowed it to continue\nsion. A federal law passed in Oc-\nfor more than a decade and a half.\ntober prohibits those convicted of\nTheir 'confessions' have been\nfederal crimes from receiving pro-\nhown to be unbelievable.\nceeds from books and movies\nWilliams's confession came the\nbased on their crimes.\n4 Arrested\nAfter Bogus\n\"ug Deal\nnts Held\nTHE WASHINGTON POST\nSaturday, February 19.\nJACKIANDERSON\nCultist Becomes\nwere not admitted as evidence to\nsaid, she was beaten up and her in-\nsupport the appeal of his conviction.\nfant son was knocked to the ground.\nAt his trial, Stoeckley had said she\nSouth Carolina police officials say\nInformant, Dies\ncouldn't remember the events of the\nthere was no evidence of foul play in\ntragic night at Fort Bragg.\nStoeckley's death. But Prince Beas-\nIn Her Hideout\nLater, however, Stoeckley told my\nley, a former detective in Fayette-\nassociate Donald Goldberg that\nville, N.C., says he believes that she\nMacDonald was telling the truth\nmay have been murdered.\nNot long ago, a tragic young\nShe admitted being part of the drug-\nBeasley had known Stoeckley for\nwoman named Helena Stoeckley\noriented cult that committed the\n15 years. He even picked her up\nstepped out of the shadows in hopes\nkillings. She said the motive for the\nwith other cult members the night\nof saving a man from life in prison\nmurders was the doctor's refusal to\nafter the MacDonald family killings:\nShe told my office a story that\nsupply illicit drugs to the group,\nBut Beasley lacked authority in the\nbrought her nothing but grief and\nwhich included soldiers at the base.\ncase, which had taken place on the\nthreats. Last month she was found\nDescribing MacDonald's 1979\nmilitary base outside of town. He\ndead in her hideout apartment in\ntrial, Stoeckley said, \"I was afraid\nheld the suspects for Army investi-\nSouth Carolina.\nthat I was going to go to prison.\" So\ngators for nearly two hours. They\nHer statements implicated a\nshe claimed that she couldn't re-\nnever showed up, BO Beasley had to\nwitchcraft cult whose members, she\nmember what happened.\nlet the suspects go.\nsaid, had threatened her with vio-\nThere was more than fear of pris-\nBeasley says Stoeckley told him\nlence. Her story also embarrassed\non, though \"At the trial I was hit on\non several occasions that she was\nthe authorities who may have sent\nthe nose,\" Stoeckley said. \"My nose\nbeing threatened by cult members:\nthe wrong man to prison.\nwas broken by one of [the members\nShortly before her death, she told\nStoeckley was a key witness in the\nof the cult]. He told me the same\nhim of another member who could\nmurder case against Dr. Jeffrey Mac-\nthing I've been [warned] the whole\ncorroborate her story.\nDonald, the Green Beret doctor who\ntime now. He said, 'Keep your\n\"That member has since been lo-\nis now serving three consecutive life\nmouth shut'\ncated and has told Ted Gunderson;\nsentences for the 1970 murder of his\nAccording to Stoeckley, this at-\nformerly an FBI agent in charge of\nwife and two young daughters at\ntack occurred at the hotel where she\nthe Los Angeles office, of involve-\nFort Bregg, N.C.\nwas staying during MacDonald's\nment in the cult. The informant also\nWhat made Stoeckley a crucial\ntrial: *I went out to the ice machine.\nprovided important new information\nwitness was her acknowledged mem-\nWell, then he followed me upstairs\non the ectivities and whereabouts of\nbership in the cult that she said per-\nand the next thing I know he just-\nthe cult members.\npetrated the murders. This corrob-\nhe punched me in the nose and\nWhat is frightening, though, is\norated Capt. MacDoneld's claim that\nbroke it\"\nthat the member of the cult was able\na drug-crazed \"hippie group\" had\nThat wasn't the only time Stoeck-\nto tell investigators where Stoeckley\nkilled his family and seriously in-\nley had been intimidated by mem-\nwas hiding out Obviously, if one\njured him.\nbers of the cult, she said. They\nmember of the cult knew where she\nUnfortunately for MacDonald,\ntracked her down last year in a shop-\nwas living, other members might also\nStoeckley's post-trial disclosures\nping-center parking lot There, she\nhave known.\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 24, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW\nSTAFF SECRETARY\nFROM:\nASSOCIATE COUNSEL MR THE PRESIDENT\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\nSUBJECT:\nNomination for Posthumous Promotion\nof Major Arthur D. Nicholson, USA\nCounsel's Office has reviewed the proposed nomination of\nMajor Arthur D. Nicholson for posthumous promotion to\nlieutenant colonel, and finds no objection to it from a\nlegal perspective. Detailed statutory procedures do exist\nfor normal promotions, but the President retains authority\nunder the Constitution to submit nominations outside those\nprocedures. Precedent for the exercise of this authority\nmay be found in the routine promotion of astronauts after\ntheir space flights. In those cases, the constitutional\nauthority is cited.\nID #.\nCU\nWHITE HOUSE\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\n0 . OUTGOING\nH INTERNAL\nI * INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nName of Correspondent: Dave cnew\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject: nomination for Posthumous Promotion of\nmajor Arthur D. nicholson, USA\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nCUHOLL\nORIGINATOR 85,05,23\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\nCUAT 18\nR 85,05,23\n5 85 05,24 5 85\n12N\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/ /\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\nI\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/ /\n-\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI . Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA. Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB. . Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD. - Draft Response\nS. For Signature\nF . Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date - Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nDocument No.\nWHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM\nDATE:\n5/23/84\nACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY:\nNOON TOMORROW 5/24\nSUBJECT:\nNOMINATION FOR POSTHUMOUS PROMOTION OF MAJOR ARTHUR D.\nNICHOLSON, USA\nACTION FYI\nACTION FYI\nVICE PRESIDENT\nLACY\nREGAN\nMcFARLANE\nSTOCKMAN\nOGLESBY\nBUCHANAN\nROLLINS\nCHAVEZ\nRYAN\nCHEW\nP\nSS SPEAKES\nDANIELS\nSPRINKEL\nFIELDING\nSVAHN\nFRIEDERSDORF\nTUTTLE\nHENKEL\nHICKEY\nHICKS\nKINGON\nREMARKS:\nAny problems? NSC has no objection.\nRESPONSE:\n1985 MY 23 FII 5: 05\nDavid L. Chew\nStaff Secretary\nExt. 2702\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 21, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT\nForwarded for your approval and signature is the nomination of\nMajor Arthur D. Nicholson, U.S. Army, for posthumous promotion\nto the grade of lieutenant colonel.\nThis nomination has been staffed by the Secretary of the Army\nand approved by the Secretary of Defense.\nRecommend you approve and sign the attached.\nHickey &\nEDWARD V. HICKEY, JR.\nAttachment\nOF DEFENSE\nTHE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE\nWASHINGTON, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA\n(MIFID STATES of AMERICA\n16 MAY 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT\nSUBJECT: Posthumous Promotion of Major Arthur D.\nNicholson\nI recommend the nomination of Major Arthur D.\nNicholson for posthumous promotion to lieutenant\ncolonel using Presidential authority in clause 2,\nsection 2, Article II of the United States Consti-\ntution. The extraordinary circumstances surrounding\nthe needless death of Major Nicholson at the hands of\na Soviet soldier warrant the award of a posthumous\npromotion.\nThe Secretary of the Army and the Chief of\nStaff, United States Army, are in agreement with this\nnomination.\nSapada\nEnclosure\nThe White House\nWashington\nTo the Senate of the United States:\nI nominate --\nThe following named officer for posthumous promotion\nin the United States Army in accordance with Article II,\nSection 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United\nStates:\nARMY\nto be lieutenant colonel\nNICHOLSON, ARTHUR D., JR., 228-62-6589\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 24, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS DDR\nSUBJECT:\nInvitation to David Chew to Participate in\nAnglo-American Successor Generation Program\nDavid Chew has been nominated as a potential participant in\nthe Anglo-American Successor Generation program. The\nprogram, sponsored by the Royal Institute of International\nAffairs and Johns Hopkins University, and funded by the J.\nHoward Pew Freedom Trust, is designed to promote dialogue\nbetween the next generation of British and American leaders.\nChew is one of 100 nominees; 24 nominees will be selected to\ngo to England October 23-27, 1985, for the program.\nI see no reason to object to Chew's potential participation\nin this program. A strong case could be made that he has\nbeen invited in his private rather than official capacity,\nsince the selection committee looks to overall accomplish-\nments of the individual rather than specific government\npositions. In any event, the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust,\nwhich funds the program, is a 501 (c) (3) organization.\nAccordingly, even if Chew were considered to be participat-\ning in his official capacity, he could accept reimbursement\nfor expenses.\nAttachment\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 24, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW\nSTAFF SECRETARY\nFROM:\nFRED F. FIELDINGOrig. signed by FFF\nCOUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT\nSUBJECT:\nInvitation to Participate in Anglo-American\nSuccessor Generation Program\nYou have asked for my views on your potential participation\nin the Anglo-American Successor Generation program, spon-\nsored by the Royal Institute of International Affairs and\nJohns Hopkins University, and funded by the J. Howard Pew\nFreedom Trust. I have no objection to your pursuing this\nopportunity.\nShould you be selected to participate in the program, you\ncould accept reimbursement of your travel, lodging, and\nrelated expenses from the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust. A\nstrong case could be made that your participation in the\nprogram would be in your private rather than official\ncapacity, in which case reimbursement would be permissible\nso long as the usual conflicts standards were not violated.\nIn any event, the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust is a 501 (c) (3)\norganization, so it may reimburse you for travel, lodging,\nand related expenses even if you were considered to be\nparticipating in your official capacity.\nGood luck!\nFFF: JGR:aea 5/24/85\nCC: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 24, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW\nSTAFF SECRETARY\nFROM:\nFRED F. FIELDING\nCOUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT\nSUBJECT:\nInvitation to Participate in Anglo-American\nSuccessor Generation Program\nYou have asked for my views on your potential participation\nin the Anglo-American Successor Generation program, spon-\nsored by the Royal Institute of International Affairs and\nJohns Hopkins University, and funded by the J. Howard Pew\nFreedom Trust. I have no objection to your pursuing this\nopportunity.\nShould you be selected to participate in the program, you\ncould accept reimbursement of your travel, lodging, and\nrelated expenses from the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust. A\nstrong case could be made that your participation in the\nprogram would be in your private rather than official\ncapacity, in which case reimbursement would be permissible\nso long as the usual conflicts standards were not violated.\nIn any event, the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust is a 501 (c) (3)\norganization, so it may reimburse you for travel, lodging,\nand related expenses even if you were considered to be\nparticipating in your official capacity.\nGood luck!\nFFF: JGR:aea 5/24/85\nCC: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\n314785\nID #\nCU\nDg\nWHITE HOUSE\nFG006-01\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no . OUTGOING\nH - INTERNAL\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nJR\nName of Correspondent: Dave chew\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject: unsalicited Invitation to participate\nin program & accept expenses\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode CV\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nORIGINATOR 85,05,11\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nCUAT 18 COURT 18\nD 85105115\na\n58510512\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nI\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nI\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR - Direct Reply w/Copy\nB. * Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS - For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date = Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\n314785 cn\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 14, 1985\nFRED FIELDING:\nRe: Unsolicited Invitation\nWhile we were in Europe, I received the\nattached unsolicited request that I \"apply\"\nfor consideration to participate in the\nAnglo-American Successor Generation\nProgram. From the looks of this it is\na week long conference in London sponsored\n(and I assume paid for) by the Johns\nHopkins University and the J. Howard Pew\nFoundation. I have no idea how or why I\ngot this letter, but I am interested in\nCounsel's determination if I can:\n(1) participate; (2) accept expenses for\nsuch participation. Please let me know\nat your earliest convenient, my \"applica-\ntion\" must be in by June lst.\nThanks.\nor\nDavid L. Chew\nSAIS\nReceived SS\nSchool of Advanced International Studies\nThe Johns Hopkins University\n1285 APR 31 AM II: 35\nPhilip H. Yasinski\nApril 30, 1985\nMr. David Chew\nDeputy Assistant to the\nPresident\nThe White House\n1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Chew:\nI am pleased to inform you that the Nominating Committee\nat The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International\nStudies has selected you as a potential participant in a series\nof Anglo-American conferences for the \"successor generation.\nThese annual conferences are being sponsored with Britain's\nRoyal Institute of International Affairs to promote a more\nmeaningful dialogue between those who will become international\nleaders in the United States and the United Kingdom. The\nprogram is supported by the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust, and\noperates with the guidance of a steering committee which includes\nMilton Eisenhower, Senators Mathias and Sarbanes, Ambassador\nKingman Brewster, and others.\nThe program is an innovative effort designed to restore\ndialogue between British and American leaders. The partic-\nipants--American and British, aged 28 to 40--are people con-\nsidered most likely to succeed to positions of authority in their\ncountries. The conferences establish a forum for high-level\ndiscussion of major themes in the political, economic, foreign\npolicy and social arenas. The long-term result anticipated is\nthe creation of a pool of talented leaders who have a deeper\nunderstanding of the views and aspirations of their counterparts\nand who can be counted on to manage the Anglo-American part-\nnership with heightened sensitivity and competence.\nThe Committee is one of 21 regional committees that have\nreviewed the accomplishments of many possible nominees throughout\nthe nation. You are regarded by leaders in this country as\nrepresenting the new generation of men and women who will manage\n1740 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 785-6844 Telex SAISJHU 64322\nMr. David Chew\nApril 30, 1985\nPage two\nglobal affairs in the early 21st century. Approximately 100\nnominees have been designated nationwide; you are drawn from a\nvariety of disciplines: industry, business and banking, law,\nlabor, education, communications, politics, science, and the\narts. The selection committee will meet in June to select\nleaders in these fields who have pioneered developments, excelled\nin management or the application of technology, or demonstrated\nexceptional ability to influence contemporary issues. Those\nselected will be invited to meet with their British counterparts\nin Oxfordshire, October 23 to 27, 1985.\nPlease provide the information requested on the enclosed\nCandidate Profile form as soon as possible; you may supplement\nthe profile with a prepared resume or vita. To ensure that you\nreceive the selection committee's full consideration, please\nreturn your profile by June 1. You will be notified of final\nselections by Monday, July 15, 1985.\nIt is indeed an honor to have been nominated for this\nexceptional program. Twenty-four Americans will be selected to\nparticipate, though each nominee is already recognized as a\nqualified spokesman for the national interest whose insight and\ninnovation will contribute to a deeper, long-term understanding\nbetween the United States and Britain.\nSincerely,\nPhilip H. Yasinski\nPHY/jb\nCC: Dr. Richard L. Lesher\nDean George R. Packard\nEnclosure\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 30, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\n820L\nSUBJECT:\nRequest for the President to Provide\na 30-Second Introduction for Osmond\nFamily 25th Anniversary Special\nSenator Jake Garn has asked the President to do a thirty-\nsecond videotape spot to introduce a two-hour Osmond Family\n25th anniversary television special. B. Oglesby channeled\nthe request to Fred Ryan.\nI recommend against the President providing a videotape or\nany other type of message for use in the television program.\nThis is of course a for-profit, commercial activity, and the\nPresident should not participate in it. Exceptions to the\ngeneral policy against such participation have been made\n(tossing the coin for the Super Bowl telecast, the \"This is\nYour Life\" participation discussed at this morning's staff\nmeeting), but I see no reason for an exception in this case.\nAttachment\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 30, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FREDERICK J. RYAN, JR.\nDEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT\nDIRECTOR, PRESIDENTIAL SCHEDULING\nFROM:\nFRED F. FIELDING Orig. signed by FFF\nCOUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT\nSUBJECT:\nRequest for the President to Provide\na 30-Second Introduction for Osmond\nFamily 25th Anniversary Special\nSenator Jake Garn has requested that the President provide a\nthirty-second videotape spot to be used to introduce a\ntwo-hour Osmond Family 25th anniversary television special.\nThe television special is of course a commercial, for-profit\nactivity. Established White House policy generally pre-\ncludes participation by the President in such activities,\nand I see no reason to depart from that policy in this\ninstance. A Presidential message introducing the special\nwould certainly be resented by the competing networks, and\njustifiably so.\nCC: M.B. Oglesby\nFFF:JGR:aea 5/30/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 30, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FREDERICK J. RYAN, JR.\nDEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT\nDIRECTOR, PRESIDENTIAL SCHEDULING\nFROM:\nFRED F. FIELDING\nCOUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT\nSUBJECT:\nRequest for the President to Provide\na 30-Second Introduction for Osmond\nFamily 25th Anniversary Special\nSenator Jake Garn has requested that the President provide a\nthirty-second videotape spot to be used to introduce a\ntwo-hour Osmond Family 25th anniversary television special.\nThe television special is of course a commercial, for-profit\nactivity. Established White House policy generally pre-\ncludes participation by the President in such activities,\nand I see no reason to depart from that policy in this\ninstance. A Presidential message introducing the special\nwould certainly be resented by the competing networks, and\njustifiably SO.\nCC: M.B. Oglesby\nFFF: JGR:aea 5/30/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nID #\nCU\nWHITE HOUSE\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no - OUTGOING\nH INTERNAL\nI - INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nName of Correspondent:\nJAKe Garn\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject: Requests POTUS to provide 30 second introduction\nfor Osmond family 25th anniversary Special\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nORIGINATOR 85,05,29\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nCUAT 18\n85,05,29\n5/85/05/30 5\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/ /\n-\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ : /\n/ /\nI\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB Non Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Dratt Response\nS. For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX- Interim Reply\nto be used 85 Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE\nType of Response = initials of Signer\nCode \"A\"\nCompletion Date - Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nMay 29, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR:\nFRED RYAN\nFROM:\nM. B. OGLESBY\nSUBJECT:\nTaped Message\nWe received this request late this afternoon from Senator Jake\nGarn. The Senator is asking the President to provide a 30\nsecond introduction to a two-hour Osmond Family 25th\nanniversary television special.\nAlthough the program will air sometime in July, the taping\nsession is scheduled for Monday, June x3\nThe Senator's office would like to know by this Friday whether\nthe President will be able to accommodate this request.\nPlease let me know what to advise Senator Garn.\nCC: Fren Fulding\nPlease fost track! Thanks\nUnited States Senate\nMEMORANDUM\n5-29-85\nPam\nThe Osmond Family Studio is\nanxious to know today or tomorrow\nif the President is able to do\nthis for them.\nI would appreciate it if you would\nlet me know.\nThanks\nuptrupports\nGreg Korologos\n2241344\nCOMMITTEES:\nAPPROPRIATIONS\nUTAH\nBANKING. HOUSING AND\nSD 505 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING\nURBAN AFFAIRS\nTELEPHONE 202-224-5444\nUnited States Senate\nINTELLIGENCE\nJEFF M. BINGHAM\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20510\nADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT\nMay 29, 1985\nPresident Ronald Reagan\nThe White House\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear President Reagan:\nThe Osmond Family from Utah are producing their 25th anniversary\ntelevision special. This two-hour special will air internationally\nsonetime in July. I would like to encourage you to open the show\nwith a thirty second spot. Enclosed is the script that is being\nsuggested. The Osmond family really wants you for the special and I\nhope that you are willing and have the time to do this for them. They\nwill be taping on Monday, June 3rd.\nThe Osmond Foundation is located at 93 West 3300 South, Salt Lake City,\nUtah, 84115. (801) 486-4824.\nJake Sincerely, Garn darn\nenc.\nTHROUGH THE YEARS: THE OSMOND'S 25TH ANNIVERSARY\n1)\n(PRESIDENT REAGAN CAMEO - :30)\nANNOUNCER (V.O.)\nLadies and gentlemen, the President\nof the United States\nPRESIDENT REAGAN\nGood evening. It gives me great pleasure\nto congratulate The Osmonds on the\noccasion of their 25th anniversary in\nshow business. Nancy and I have long\nbeen fans and admirers of this most\ntalented musical family. Like you,\nwe've watched them grow up before our\nvery eyes, and tonight\nAlan, WAYNE\nMerrill, Jay, - Donny, Marie\nand Jimmy\non behalf of your fans\neverywhere\nwe'd like to thank\nyou for all the entertainment and\nlaughter and music you've given us\nthrough the years.\n(INTO: OPENING VIDEO MONTAGE)"
}