Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
118568140
label
JGR/Dozier, Gilbert (6 of 6)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118568140
contentType
document
title
JGR/Dozier, Gilbert (6 of 6)
citationUrl
identifierLocal
485
collections
Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)
John Roberts' Subject Files
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118568140
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1986-12-31
year
1986
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1982-01-01
year
1982
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
21baad6c0fe8c445
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.
Collection: Roberts, John G.: Files
Folder Title: JGR/Dozier, Gilbert (6 of 6)
Box: 18
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Knapp:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Leonard Knapp, Jr.
District Attorney
P.O. Box 3206
Lake Charles, LA 70602
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Perkins:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
-
Mr. John Perkins
9770 Regency Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70815
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
cc: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Ms. Ruiz:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ms. Gladys Ruiz
9987 E. Tampa Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70815
RAH: JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Hollister:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
John A. Hollister, J.D.
622 Baronne Street
New Orleans, LA 70113
RAH: : JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Kennedy:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Frank S. Kennedy, Esquire
Kennedy, Goodman & Donovan
1212 Mid South Towers
Shreveport, LA 71101
RAH: JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mrs. Foreman:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mrs. Dorothy P. Foreman
222 W. St. Louis
Lafayette, LA 70506
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
cc: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Slack:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. John S. Slack, III
214 Woodstone Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
RAH: JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Gwin:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. John D. Gwin
17134 Chadsford Avenue
Baton Rouge, LA 70816
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Dr. Diamond:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Jack R. Diamond, M.D.
120 Westchester Place
Slidell, LA 70458
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Young:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Stuart W. Young
4707 Old Boyce Road
Alexandria, LA 71303
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Landry:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Percy J. Landry, Jr.
355 Napoleon Street
P.O. Box 305
Baton Rouge, LA 70821
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Jay Williams
506 Woodbine
Shreveport, LA 71105
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Percival:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. and Mrs. John S. Percival
6 Patricia Drive
Covington, LA 70433
RAH: JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mr. Kent:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Reuben Kent
16 Memory Lane
West Monroe, LA 71291
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 30, 1984
Dear Ms. Kelly:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ms. Myrtle G. Kelly
546 Del Norte Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 30, 1984
Dear Ms. Nelson:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ms. Alice R. Nelson
47 Julian Street
Dorchester, MA 02125
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 30, 1984
Dear Mr. Dimos:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. John Dimos
2134 Maywood Drive
Monroe, LA 71201
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 30, 1984
Dear Mr. Castaing:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Charles E. Castaing
Castaing & Hussey
525 Weeks Street
P.O. Box 788
New Iberia, LA 70560
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 30, 1984
Dear Dr. Dreger:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ralph Mason Dreger, Ph.D.
2106 Lee Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Dr. Ritter:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Dr. Robbins H. Ritter
Larkspur
P.O. Box 103
Roseland, LA 70456
RAH: JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Ms. Williamson:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ms. Carmen Williamson
1021 Rue Bordeaux
Slidell, LA 70458
RAH:JGR:aea 8/30/84
cc: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
August 31, 1984
Dear Mrs. Loewenstein:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mrs. J.E. Loewenstein
616 Linden Street
Shreveport, LA 71104
RAH: JGR:aea 8/30/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron