Document
NSDD 249 Additional Instructions for Current Nuclear and Space Talks (NST) Negotiating Round
Images (19)
- Része ennek Numbered National Security Policy Papers, National Security Decision Directives (NSDDs)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 19UNCLASSIFIEU
NEGOTIATIONS ON STRATEGIC FENSIVE ARMS.
8. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS
REMAIN UNCHANGED.
9. 9A FTAINS THE TEXT OF HE INITIAL SOVIET
PARAGRAPH
PROPOSAL CONTAINS TIE L INGUAGE AGREED to MOI W NING OF
MADE IN REYNOL IK THE MORNING THE
OCTOBER 11.
PARAGRAPH U.S. - SOVIET BOTH EXPERTS ARE PROY GRO IP DEL Il RING ONLY THE FOR EARL THE IFO IATION OF 12
9B
OCTOBER.
THE NEGOTIATING GROUP.
-- STRATEGIC A. INITIAL ARMS. AN AGREEMENT TO REDUCE BY FIFTY PERCENT
SOVIET PROPOSAL, AM OCTOBER II. ON
THE STRATEGIC CONSIDERATION THE HISTORICALLY
OFFENSIVE ARMS OF THE USSR AND FORMED THE USA
TAKING INTO FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES OF THE REDUCTIONS PARTIES'
DISTINCTIVE FORCES. WITHIN THIS FRAMEWORK,
STRATEGIC SHALL APPLY TO ALL TYPES OFAOFFENSIVE STRATEGIS ARMS, BE
SOLUTION SHALL ASO
FOUND INCLUDING WITH HEAVY REGARD MISSILES. TO LIMER IG THE DEPLOYMEN LONG-
RANGE SEA-LAUNCHED M SSILES.
ON ALL MATTERS RELAS ING TO HE PROBLEM TE REGARD
JF STRA CEGIC
IILL
NEGO!
OFFENSIVE ARMS THI IN PAR? ES TS ND CONCERN ID I SPLAYING
FOR THEIR MUTUAL
A POLITICAL WILL TO REA H A REEMENT.
-- B. EXPERTS
GROUP AGE ED LANGUAGE, EARL! AM OCTOBER
12. ON STRATEGIC
ARMS AL AGREEMENT WOU B1 ARMS PREPARED TO
TO REDUCE NUMBER OF ICBMS, SLBMS AND HEAVY BOMBERS THAN
BY FIFTY PER
TRATEGIC OFFEI
AN (APPROXIMATELY EQUAL 1600) AND WARHEADS FORMED (NOT MORE DISTINCTIVE 6000)
,
TAKING INTO ACCOUNT STRUCTURES HISTORICALLY OF THE PARTIES' STRATEGIC
FEATURES FORCES. OF WITHIN THE OF THIS STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK, OFFENSIVE REDUCTIONS ARMS, MUTUALLY INCLUDING SHALL APPLY A
TO ALL TYPES NUMBER OF HEAVY MISSILES. A TO
SIGNIFICANT SOLUTION SHALL LSO BE FOUND SEA-Y LIMITING NCHED
ACCEPTABLE OF LONG-RANGE CLEAR-ARMED
DEPLOYMENT
CRUISE MISSILES.
ON ALL MATTERS RELAT G TO THE PROBLEM TE
STR TEGIC
OFFENSIVE ARMS THE
ARTIES WILL NEGOT)
HAV NG REGARD
S,
ND ISPLAYING
FOR THEIR MUTUAL TEB STS AND CONCE
TZ
A POLITICAL WILL TO CH CREEMENT
** END OF CABLE **
Relations
belongs_to