Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
75720352
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Co
of
November 25, 1925.
Mr. Edward R. McGlynn,
810 Broad Street,
Newark, N. J.
Dear Mr. McGlynn:-
We are enclosing herewith a clipping from
the New York Herald-Trilune of November 24th on the subject of
radium, with the thought that such statements as this, of which
there are many, might be of aid in a defence of our suit in re:
Carlough.
This article is typicalof the extreme
ignorance shown generally throughout the country in regard to
radium. You will note the article is given first page prominence
and it has been generally published throughout the country. The
actual fact is that the amount of radium lost was a 50 milligram
tube and actually worth but $3500.00. The papers seem to thrive
on gigantic exaggerations whenever radium is mentioned and the
Newark press and the press generally throughout the country has
been no exception when it comes to the Carlough and Kuser cases.
Very truly yours,
Treasurer.
CBLee-CBO.
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to