Letters Sent, September 9, 1927

EDWARDS & SMITH No. 1 Exchange Place Jersey City, N. J. September 9, 1927. Messrs. Collins & Corbin, 1 Exchange Place, Att: Mr. Markley. Jersey City, N.J. Re: Fryer VS. U.S. Radium Corp. Gent lemen: I have yours of the 29th ult. in the above entitled matter. of course, while in this particular suit I am merely sitting in with you, the answers filed in the new suits which Berry is contemplatirg bringing in the Court of Chancery will be in all probability quite similar to the answer filed in your suit. I have looked it over and it seems to me to be in proper shape. I do not quite understand, however, what you mean when you say that you thought it wise to answer that upon the face of the bill there appears no equity, and you refer to the cases of Lamb vs. Martin, 43 N. J. Eq. 34; Clark vs. Augustine, 62 N. J. Eq. 689; and Freeman VS. Conover, 95 N. J. L. 89, 94. It seems to me that if the statements set forth in the bill were true, the complainant might have a case. Won't you please let me hear from you on this point? Very truly yours, EDWIN F. SMITH EFS/RH