Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
RECEIVED
COLUMBIA
OCT 17 1928
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
October 15, 1928
Mr. H. H. Barker
United States Radium Corporation
RADIC
535 Pearl Street
MAYERIAL CORP.
New York City, New York
My dear Howard:
First of all let me thank you for your notes on progress of tests
by the Commission, as per yours of October 11, 1928.
Enclosed herewith is another installment of our report. I agree
fully with you about getting published the material now in hand. To this end I
have
finished up the essentials of the theoretical part. Let us then try to assemble the
material now in hand and put it in final form.
In the meantime, could we not hold the fort by indicating in our
title, as is quite often done, that this is the first contribution on the subject.
The title would then be:
THE DETECTION AND ESTIMATION OF PADIUM AND MESOTHORIUM IN LIVING PERSONS.
I.
Then on the page giving the outline insert this sentence just before the heading,
"GAMMA RAY MSTHOD":
The experiments conducted on the radioactivity of excreta and the detection of radio-
activity in expired air by the scintillation method will be reported in a second con-
tribution."
Subject D, as appears in our notes, is H. H. Barker, with clothes
on, tested August 24, 1928. Perhaps this result should not be included after all.
I hope that you and DI. Flinn will add to Table 1, page 3.
Now let me take un some of the suggestions in your letter of
October 2, 1928.
l. Limit of Emanation Method: I have gone the limit in my state-
ment on page 1 of introduction but I hope not too far. In the Lind electroscope
7 x 10- curies Radon - 7000 x10th grams, produce a drift of 1 division per second
or 1 curie produces a net drift of 0.00014 divisions per second. In an instrument
of smaller electrostatic capacity like a Wulf quartz fiber, one ullicurie would pro-
duce a drift three to ten times as great which is about the same as the value
we
found for gamma ray instrument when 5 micrograms standard was used. When we tested
you on August 24, we found a net drift of 0.00033 divisions per second, which we re-
port as 4 ug:
But I am not adverse to making this, " a few micrograms in place
of 1 microgram; but when you go down to 2 M for Wulf instrument by gamma ray method,
please remember the net drift increase will be only 0.00012 divisions per second.
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 05fb0bf6e5977d1f
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75723236
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75723236",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723236",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Received to H.H. Barker, October 15, 1928",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723236",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75723236",
"label": "Letters Received to H.H. Barker, October 15, 1928",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723236"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75723236",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723236",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Received to H.H. Barker, October 15, 1928",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723236",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723236",
"naId": 75723236,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001474_Page_1.jpg",
"mediaId": "05fb0bf6e5977d1f",
"ocrText": "UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI\nRECEIVED\nCOLUMBIA\nOCT 17 1928\nDEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY\nOctober 15, 1928\nMr. H. H. Barker\nUnited States Radium Corporation\nRADIC\n535 Pearl Street\nMAYERIAL CORP.\nNew York City, New York\nMy dear Howard:\nFirst of all let me thank you for your notes on progress of tests\nby the Commission, as per yours of October 11, 1928.\nEnclosed herewith is another installment of our report. I agree\nfully with you about getting published the material now in hand. To this end I\nhave\nfinished up the essentials of the theoretical part. Let us then try to assemble the\nmaterial now in hand and put it in final form.\nIn the meantime, could we not hold the fort by indicating in our\ntitle, as is quite often done, that this is the first contribution on the subject.\nThe title would then be:\nTHE DETECTION AND ESTIMATION OF PADIUM AND MESOTHORIUM IN LIVING PERSONS.\nI.\nThen on the page giving the outline insert this sentence just before the heading,\n\"GAMMA RAY MSTHOD\":\nThe experiments conducted on the radioactivity of excreta and the detection of radio-\nactivity in expired air by the scintillation method will be reported in a second con-\ntribution.\"\nSubject D, as appears in our notes, is H. H. Barker, with clothes\non, tested August 24, 1928. Perhaps this result should not be included after all.\nI hope that you and DI. Flinn will add to Table 1, page 3.\nNow let me take un some of the suggestions in your letter of\nOctober 2, 1928.\nl. Limit of Emanation Method: I have gone the limit in my state-\nment on page 1 of introduction but I hope not too far. In the Lind electroscope\n7 x 10- curies Radon - 7000 x10th grams, produce a drift of 1 division per second\nor 1 curie produces a net drift of 0.00014 divisions per second. In an instrument\nof smaller electrostatic capacity like a Wulf quartz fiber, one ullicurie would pro-\nduce a drift three to ten times as great which is about the same as the value\nwe\nfound for gamma ray instrument when 5 micrograms standard was used. When we tested\nyou on August 24, we found a net drift of 0.00033 divisions per second, which we re-\nport as 4 ug:\nBut I am not adverse to making this, \" a few micrograms in place\nof 1 microgram; but when you go down to 2 M for Wulf instrument by gamma ray method,\nplease remember the net drift increase will be only 0.00012 divisions per second."
}