Ask the Scholar
Page 6 of 9
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
6.
of danger, and charges him with expert knowledge
and with the consequences likely to result from
its use."
In Colrick VS. Swinburne, 105 N. Y., 503,
where the wrongful act was diversion of water by the up-
land owner, resulting in deprivation to the owner below, it
was held that the cause of action does not accrue until the
actual injury occurs, but that the damages will be limited
to those sustained within six years prior to commencement of
the action.
See also-
Bank of Hartford vs. Waterman, 26 Conn., 324.
Inhabitants of New Salem vs. Eagle Mills,
138 Mass. 8.
Town of Troy VS. Cheshire R. Co. Co., 23 N. H.,
101.
Waugh vs. Guthrie Gas &c. Co., 37 Okla., 239;
131 Pac., 174.
In Delaware & Raritan Canal Co. vs. Wright,
21 N.J.L., 469, it was held that the statute begins to run
only when the damage manifests itself. See also
Delaware & Raritan Canal Co. VS. Lee, 22 N.J.L., 243.
In Rector, &c. of Church of Holy Communion
VS. Paterson Extension R. Co., 63 N.J.L., 470; 43 Atl., 696,
it was held that a cause of action for damage to the walls
of a church by reason of an adjacent excavation was barred
by the statute, because action was not commenced within six
years after the making of the excavation; but this decision
Page data
- Page
- 6
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 46627dfb00429d45
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75726225
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75726225",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726225",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Deposition, February 20, 1931",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726225",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 9,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75726225",
"label": "Deposition, February 20, 1931",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726225"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75726225",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726225",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Deposition, February 20, 1931",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726225",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 9,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726225",
"naId": 75726225,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 6,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002382_Page_6.jpg",
"mediaId": "46627dfb00429d45",
"ocrText": "6.\nof danger, and charges him with expert knowledge\nand with the consequences likely to result from\nits use.\"\nIn Colrick VS. Swinburne, 105 N. Y., 503,\nwhere the wrongful act was diversion of water by the up-\nland owner, resulting in deprivation to the owner below, it\nwas held that the cause of action does not accrue until the\nactual injury occurs, but that the damages will be limited\nto those sustained within six years prior to commencement of\nthe action.\nSee also-\nBank of Hartford vs. Waterman, 26 Conn., 324.\nInhabitants of New Salem vs. Eagle Mills,\n138 Mass. 8.\nTown of Troy VS. Cheshire R. Co. Co., 23 N. H.,\n101.\nWaugh vs. Guthrie Gas &c. Co., 37 Okla., 239;\n131 Pac., 174.\nIn Delaware & Raritan Canal Co. vs. Wright,\n21 N.J.L., 469, it was held that the statute begins to run\nonly when the damage manifests itself. See also\nDelaware & Raritan Canal Co. VS. Lee, 22 N.J.L., 243.\nIn Rector, &c. of Church of Holy Communion\nVS. Paterson Extension R. Co., 63 N.J.L., 470; 43 Atl., 696,\nit was held that a cause of action for damage to the walls\nof a church by reason of an adjacent excavation was barred\nby the statute, because action was not commenced within six\nyears after the making of the excavation; but this decision"
}