Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

December 7th,1931. Dr. James Ewing, Cornell University Medical College, 1st Ave. and 28th St., N.Y.C. Dear Dr. Ewing: We are herewith enclosing two bills from Dr. Peabody, for x-ray examinations of Mrs. Parice and Mrs. Hussman. We shall withhold payment of these bills until we have your approval. In a 'phone conversation with Dr. Craver, of even date, he indicated that he presumed that these examinations were made at the request of Dr. Humphries, for he had no definite knowledge as to their having been made. This again brings up the subject of whether or not these x-ray pictures were made with the proper authorization. In case the girls were under Dr. Humphries care and he requested the plates, we feel that your Committee should have been advised as to what was being done. We also have a bill before us from L. Bamberger and Co., on account of Mrs. Larice for one corset at $8.50, one brassiere at $1.50 and alterations 50$, making a total of $10.50, which bears your approval. Dr. Craver mentioned that at Mrs. Larice's last visit to the Hospital you suggested that she wear a corset to support her back, and we presume that this constitutes the grounds under which she has sent us the bill. We, however, do not feel that the brassiere was a necessary adjunct for the support of her back, but a garment usually worn by the average woman. While the amount involved is not large, still we believe there is a principle involved here which should not be passed by, otherwise it will not be long before these girls will be sending us all sorts of bills for payment. We have probably been very lenient in the past with reference to the payment of certain bills, and if such leniency is continued I am afraid that a point will be reached where we will be paying for many of the ordinary necessities of life rather than expense involved for reasonable medical care. Please understand that it is not the amount involved in this instance, that we are object to, but it is the principle. Sincerely yours, HHBarker:RH Vice President.

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
fc7b34d5c78aa664
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75726782
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75726782",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726782",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Sent to James Ewing, December 7, 1931",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726782",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.jpg",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75726782",
    "label": "Letters Sent to James Ewing, December 7, 1931",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726782"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75726782",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726782",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Sent to James Ewing, December 7, 1931",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726782",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.jpg",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726782",
    "naId": 75726782,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002556.pdf",
    "mediaId": "fc7b34d5c78aa664",
    "ocrText": "December 7th,1931.\nDr. James Ewing,\nCornell University Medical College,\n1st Ave. and 28th St.,\nN.Y.C.\nDear Dr. Ewing:\nWe are herewith enclosing two bills from Dr. Peabody,\nfor x-ray examinations of Mrs. Parice and Mrs. Hussman. We shall\nwithhold payment of these bills until we have your approval. In a\n'phone conversation with Dr. Craver, of even date, he indicated that\nhe presumed that these examinations were made at the request of\nDr. Humphries, for he had no definite knowledge as to their having\nbeen made.\nThis again brings up the subject of whether or not these\nx-ray pictures were made with the proper authorization. In case the\ngirls were under Dr. Humphries care and he requested the plates, we feel\nthat your Committee should have been advised as to what was being done.\nWe also have a bill before us from L. Bamberger and Co.,\non account of Mrs. Larice for one corset at $8.50, one brassiere at $1.50\nand alterations 50$, making a total of $10.50, which bears your approval.\nDr. Craver mentioned that at Mrs. Larice's last visit to the Hospital\nyou suggested that she wear a corset to support her back, and we presume\nthat this constitutes the grounds under which she has sent us the bill.\nWe, however, do not feel that the brassiere was a necessary adjunct for\nthe support of her back, but a garment usually worn by the average\nwoman. While the amount involved is not large, still we believe there\nis a principle involved here which should not be passed by, otherwise it\nwill not be long before these girls will be sending us all sorts of bills\nfor payment. We have probably been very lenient in the past with reference\nto the payment of certain bills, and if such leniency is continued I am\nafraid that a point will be reached where we will be paying for many of\nthe ordinary necessities of life rather than expense involved for reasonable\nmedical care.\nPlease understand that it is not the amount involved in this\ninstance, that we are object to, but it is the principle.\nSincerely yours,\nHHBarker:RH\nVice President."
}