Ask the Scholar
Page 5 of 8
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
1. That the defendant answer this bill of complaint without oath
and each statement herein made.
2.
That it be decreed that it would be and is a fraud upon the part
of the defendant to set up and plead in defense of the action pending in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey that the cause of
action is barred by the statute of limitations, and that the defendant is de-
barred and estopped from doing so, as to the counts aforesaid.
3.
That the defendant be permanently enjoined from setting up in
defense of the action pending in the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey that the cause of action is barred by the statute of
limitations as to the counts aforesaid.
4.
That the defendant be directed to withdraw from its answer filed
in the action pending in the United States District Court for the District of
New Jersey all matters therein set up wherein it is alleged that the action is
barred by the statute of limitations as to the counts aforesaid.
5.
That pending the hearing of this cause the defendant be enjoined
and restrained from taking any proceedings in the action pending in the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey to dismiss or non-suit the
same, until the determination of the cause made by this bill, and that the
defendant be likewise enjoined and restrained from proceeding in said court and
in said cause to secure a determination of the issues raised by the matters set
forth in its answer relating to the barring of the claim of the plaintiff by the
statute of limitations, as to the counts aforesaid.
6. That plaintiff may have such other and further relief as may be
equitable and just.
7. That a writ of subpoena may issue commanding said defendant to
answer this bill of complaint and to abide by such decree as this court may
make in the premises.
The plaintiff, Thomas Connolly, residing in the City of
Newark, aforementioned, says thats
SECOND COUNT
1. The plaintiff repeats the allegations of the first count.
total
Page data
- Page
- 5
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 3d666f7baa94d9dc
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75727970
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75727970",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727970",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Copies of Court Documents, June 5, 1934",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727970",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 8,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75727970",
"label": "Copies of Court Documents, June 5, 1934",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727970"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75727970",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727970",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Copies of Court Documents, June 5, 1934",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727970",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 8,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727970",
"naId": 75727970,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 5,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002914_Page_5.jpg",
"mediaId": "3d666f7baa94d9dc",
"ocrText": "1. That the defendant answer this bill of complaint without oath\nand each statement herein made.\n2.\nThat it be decreed that it would be and is a fraud upon the part\nof the defendant to set up and plead in defense of the action pending in the\nUnited States District Court for the District of New Jersey that the cause of\naction is barred by the statute of limitations, and that the defendant is de-\nbarred and estopped from doing so, as to the counts aforesaid.\n3.\nThat the defendant be permanently enjoined from setting up in\ndefense of the action pending in the United States District Court for the\nDistrict of New Jersey that the cause of action is barred by the statute of\nlimitations as to the counts aforesaid.\n4.\nThat the defendant be directed to withdraw from its answer filed\nin the action pending in the United States District Court for the District of\nNew Jersey all matters therein set up wherein it is alleged that the action is\nbarred by the statute of limitations as to the counts aforesaid.\n5.\nThat pending the hearing of this cause the defendant be enjoined\nand restrained from taking any proceedings in the action pending in the United\nStates District Court for the District of New Jersey to dismiss or non-suit the\nsame, until the determination of the cause made by this bill, and that the\ndefendant be likewise enjoined and restrained from proceeding in said court and\nin said cause to secure a determination of the issues raised by the matters set\nforth in its answer relating to the barring of the claim of the plaintiff by the\nstatute of limitations, as to the counts aforesaid.\n6. That plaintiff may have such other and further relief as may be\nequitable and just.\n7. That a writ of subpoena may issue commanding said defendant to\nanswer this bill of complaint and to abide by such decree as this court may\nmake in the premises.\nThe plaintiff, Thomas Connolly, residing in the City of\nNewark, aforementioned, says thats\nSECOND COUNT\n1. The plaintiff repeats the allegations of the first count.\ntotal"
}