Ask the Scholar

Page 42 of 81
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 42

OCR

Freedom and Our Future Page 2 Memorandum for the President Amartya Sen, February 25, 2000 The progress of a community can hardly be judged primarily by an increase in inanimate objects of convenience, such as a rise in the GNP (or in personal incomes), or industrialization, or technological advance, or social modernization. These are, of course, valuable - often crucially important - accomplishments, but their value must depend on what they do to the lives and options of the people involved. Commodities are valuable because they enhance our capabilities - our freedom to do the things that we value. That relationship is far from simple, and involve many variables that are influenced by the institutional and organizational arrangements in the economy and society.² Freedom as Means In addition to the role of freedom as an end, it is also a most effective instrument. Freedom of one kind can be a very effective means of enhancing freedom of other kinds. Different types of freedom tend to sustain each other.³ A person's actual capability to achieve the things he or she values can be influenced by economic opportunities, political liberties, social facilities, as well as the enabling conditions of good health, basic education, and the encouragement and cultivation of initiatives. These opportunities are, to a great extent, mutually complementary, and tend to reinforce the reach and use of each other. For example, political freedom and democracy give people the power to protest against economic catastrophes (this is related to the well-established fact that famines never occur in any democratic country). Similarly, social opportunities in the form of education and health care help 2 I have discussed this relationship in Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North- Holland, 1985), and also in Development as Freedom (1999). 3 The empirical evidence for this rather strong claim is discussed in Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (1999).

Page data

Page
42
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
6f9788a89941c1d3
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
26413421
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "26413421",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413421",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Visions of the Future from Leading Thinkers [Binder] [2]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413421",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Bruce Reed's General Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "imageCount": 81,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "26413421",
    "label": "Visions of the Future from Leading Thinkers [Binder] [2]",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413421"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "26413421",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413421",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Visions of the Future from Leading Thinkers [Binder] [2]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413421",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
        "Bruce Reed's General Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_001.JPG",
    "imageCount": 81,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413421",
    "naId": 26413421,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "otherTitles": [
        "42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015"
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 42,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/21/4134/26413421/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-General/2011-0299-S-General-JPG/Box_155/42-t-7367462-20110299S-155-011-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_155_011_2015_Page_042.JPG",
    "mediaId": "6f9788a89941c1d3",
    "ocrText": "Freedom and Our Future\nPage 2\nMemorandum for the President\nAmartya Sen, February 25, 2000\nThe progress of a community can hardly be judged primarily by an increase in inanimate\nobjects of convenience, such as a rise in the GNP (or in personal incomes), or industrialization, or\ntechnological advance, or social modernization. These are, of course, valuable - often crucially\nimportant - accomplishments, but their value must depend on what they do to the lives and options\nof the people involved. Commodities are valuable because they enhance our capabilities - our\nfreedom to do the things that we value. That relationship is far from simple, and involve many\nvariables that are influenced by the institutional and organizational arrangements in the economy\nand society.²\nFreedom as Means\nIn addition to the role of freedom as an end, it is also a most effective instrument. Freedom\nof one kind can be a very effective means of enhancing freedom of other kinds. Different types of\nfreedom tend to sustain each other.³ A person's actual capability to achieve the things he or she\nvalues can be influenced by economic opportunities, political liberties, social facilities, as well as the\nenabling conditions of good health, basic education, and the encouragement and cultivation of\ninitiatives. These opportunities are, to a great extent, mutually complementary, and tend to\nreinforce the reach and use of each other.\nFor example, political freedom and democracy give people the power to protest against\neconomic catastrophes (this is related to the well-established fact that famines never occur in any\ndemocratic country). Similarly, social opportunities in the form of education and health care help\n2\nI have discussed this relationship in Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-\nHolland, 1985), and also in Development as Freedom (1999).\n3 The empirical evidence for this rather strong claim is discussed in Amartya Sen, Development\nas Freedom (1999)."
}