Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
24822467
label
Teen Pregnancy - Health and Human Services Report 1999
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
24822467
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7763278-20121035S-017-011-2015
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
c2a63f868c572be4
ocrText
A National Strategy to Prevent Teen Pregnancy ANNUAL REPORT 1998-99 HUMAN SERVICES USA & HEALTH OF DEPARTMENT U.S. Department of Health and Human Services June 1999 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Trends in Teen Births & Pregnancies 4 Building Partnerships 6 Supporting Promising Approaches 10 Research & Evaluation Activities 17 Appendix I Declines in Teenage Birth Rates, 1991-1997: National and State Patterns Appendix II Measuring the Proportion of Communities With Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs Appendix III HHS Activities Appendix IV HHS Funded Data Sets Introduction At the end of the second year of its National Strategy to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is pleased to report that teen pregnancy rates continue to decline. The on-going decrease in teen pregnancy rates is encouraging and suggests that the Department's Strategy to prevent teen pregnancy is having a positive impact. The President and Congress called on HHS to develop a National Strategy to address this serious challenge and to assure that at least 25 percent of communities in this country have teen pregnancy prevention programs in place - as mandated under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. The Department responded to this call by releasing a National Strategy to Prevent Teen Pregnancy in January of 1997. This Strategy presented a comprehensive plan to prevent teen pregnancies in the United States by strengthening, integrating, and supporting teen pregnancy prevention and other youth-related activities in communities across the country. More Good News. Encouraging trends in teen pregnancy rates continue: Teen birth rates declined for white, black, American Indian, Asian or Pacific Islander and Hispanic women ages 15-19, from 1991 through 1997. The birth rate for black teens reached the lowest rate ever reported for blacks in 1997, and also declined more than any group between 1991 and 1997. Teen birth rates have decreased in every state. Key Principles. The National Strategy is guided by five key principles which shape and guide our prevention efforts. Based on ideas that are essential to all community efforts, as indicated by research and experience, the key principles are the cornerstone of the Department's Strategy. 1. Parents and other adult mentors must play key roles in encouraging young adults to avoid early pregnancy and to stay in school. 2. Abstinence and personal responsibility must be the primary messages of prevention programs. 3. Young people must be given clear connections and pathways to college or jobs that give them hope and a reason to stay in school and avoid pregnancy. 4. Public and private-sector partners throughout communities - including parents, schools, business, media, health and human service providers, and religious organizations - must work together to develop comprehensive strategies. 5. Real success requires a sustained commitment to the young person over a long period of time. TRENDS IN TEEN BIRTHS AND PREGNANCIES The Department is pleased to report that, according to the latest data compiled from HHS' National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) (through 1997), teen birth rates continue to decline steadily. Notably, these declines cut across ages (younger and older adolescents) and race and Hispanic origin. Further, fewer teenagers are having second children. Teen Birth Rates Declining Steadily. Both national and state-level teenage birth rates have fallen since 1991. The overall rate for teenagers declined by 16 percent from 1991-1997 (62.1 births per 1,000 females aged 15-19 in 1991 to 52.3 in 1997). Between 1991 and 1997: Teen birth rates have fallen in all states (the decline is not statistically significant for Rhode Island).¹ Rates fell by 20 percent or more in 10 states and the District of Columbia. The U.S. rate fell more for younger than for older teenagers. Birth rates dropped 21 percent for girls 10-14 years old, 17 percent for 15-17 year olds and 11 percent for 18-19 year olds.¹ Teen Birth Rates by Age. Birth rates for teenagers differ substantially by age. In 1997, 83.6 of every 1,000 older teens had a baby, more than 2.5 times the rate for teens aged 15-17, which was 32.1 per 1,000. The declines in rates since 1991 experienced by older and younger teens partly reverse the 20 to 27 percent increase found during the late 1980s.² The U.S. birth rate for teenagers declined 4 percent from 1996 (54.4 per 1,000 aged 15-19) to 1997, and 16 percent from 1991 to 1997. The rate for teens aged 15-17 years fell 5 percent between 1996 (33.8 per 1,000) and 1997, and 17 percent between 1991 (38.7 per 1,000) and 1997. The rate for older teens aged 18-19 declined 11 percent since 1991 (94.4 per 1,000). Trends by Race and Hispanic Origin. Birth rates for black teenagers have dropped steeply in the 1990s. Since 1991, black teenagers have shown the largest declines in teen childbearing. The overall rate for black teens fell 24 percent from 1991 to 1997 (115.5 per 1,000 aged 15-19 in 1991 to 88.2 in 1997). The rate for young black teenagers dropped 28 percent from 1991 to 1997 (84.1 per 1,000 aged 15-17 in 1991 to 60.8 in 1997). The rate for older black teenagers declined 18 percent during 1991-97, from 158.6 to 130.1. In addition, birth rates have fallen since 1991 for non-Hispanic white teenagers. The overall rate fell 17 percent (43.4 per 1,000 aged 15-19 in 1991 to 36.0 in 1997), but rates declined more for younger than for older teens. Teen birth rates have declined for Hispanic teenagers as well, but the declines began later (just since 1994) and have been smaller (10 percent). Overall, birth rates continue to be substantially higher for Hispanic and black teenagers than for non-Hispanic white teenagers; since 1994, Hispanic teens have had higher rates than any other group. Fewer Teenage Mothers Have Second Child. One of the key HHS findings has been that the rate of second births to teenagers who have already had one child has declined 21 percent from 1991 to 1997 (221 per 1,000 in 1991 to 174 in 1997)¹,². In other words, the proportion of teen mothers who gave birth to a second child fell from 22 percent to 17 percent. The first birth rate for teenagers fell by 6 percent from 1991 to 1996 and then declined an additional 4 percent from 1996 to 1997; the first birth rate has thus declined 10 percent since 1991. Births to Unmarried Teens. Birth rates for unmarried teenagers declined again in 1997 for the third consecutive year. Despite these declines, out-of-wedlock childbearing for teen remains a serious concern. Since 1994, the rate for teens 15-17 years has fallen 12 percent, and the rate for teens 18-19 dropped 7 percent. Despite these declines in birth rates, the proportion of teen births that were to unmarried teenagers continued to increase in 1997. Eighty-seven percent of births to 15-17-year-olds and 73 percent of births to 18-19-year-olds were non-marital in 1997. Data Collection and Analysis. Accurate and timely reporting of trends and variations in teen birth rates is based on information reported on the birth certificates of all babies born in the United States. This information is provided to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) by the state health departments through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. NCHS and the states share the costs for collecting and processing the data. The last three years have seen faster data collection and processing at the state level and by NCHS. Information can now be analyzed and released more quickly. The preliminary files provided by NCHS' new statistical series contain very large samples; for example, the most recent preliminary file, for 1997 births, was based on over 99 percent of all births. Data from that file were published in October 1998, and the findings from the preliminary file have recently been validated with publication of the final data for 1997 1,3 More information on the collection and reporting of teen birth data is presented in Appendix I. I Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Matthew S TJ. Births: Final Data for 1997. National Vital Statistics Reports; Vol. 47, No. 18. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1999. 2 Ventura SJ, Matthews TJ, Curtin SC. Declines in Teenage Birth Rates, 1991-97: National and State Patterns. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 12. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. 3 Ventura SJ, Anderson RN, Martin JA, Smith BL. Births and Deaths: Preliminary Data for 1997. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 4. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS Building partnerships remains a critical aspect of the Department's National Strategy to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. HHS is committed to sustaining current partnerships and creating opportunities for new partnerships to grow. Because HHS recognizes that each group and individual can make valuable contributions to prevention efforts, the Department is committed to involving a wide-range of partners in its work. HHS partnerships involve national, state, and local organizations; schools; health and social service organizations; business; religious institutions; tribes and tribal organizations; federal, state, and local governments; parents and other family members; and teens themselves. HHS seeks to develop partnerships among all groups and individuals concerned about teen pregnancy. While valuing the potential of partnerships to increase cooperation, reduce duplication, pool resources, integrate services and ultimately, build communities, it is also important to recognize the challenges of developing and sustaining them. Partnerships, particularly at the community- level, take a long time to establish and require considerable energy to maintain. Reaching true community consensus on controversial issues is a difficult and time-intensive process. Collaboration is particularly challenging when partners come from different racial, ethnic, linguistic, religious, class and/or educational backgrounds - yet it is exactly this cross-sectional involvement that is the most valuable product of collaboration. Community Partnerships HHS is involved in several projects and programs that promote partnerships in communities interested in preventing teen pregnancy. Following are highlights and updates of HHS efforts to build and strengthen partnerships in communities across the country. Get Organized: A Guide to Preventing Teen Pregnancy. In partnership with the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, a three volume guide for states and communities to use in their fight against teen pregnancy is being developed. The guide includes chapters on important topics such as: "Promising Approaches", "Involving Teen Boys and Young Men", "Involving Parents", "Involving the Faith Community", "Involving Health Care Professionals", and " Involving the Business Community." Other chapters will address issues that often challenge community leaders in their efforts to prevent teen pregnancy such as how to conduct a community needs assessment, how to raise funds for prevention programs, how to create an effective teen pregnancy prevention message, and how to move forward in the face of conflict. The Indian Health Service. The Indian Health Service (IHS) is a direct care organization with most efforts concerning teen pregnancy concentrated on providing appropriate prenatal and neonatal care. There is, however, a growing effort to work with various organizations - federal, state, and local - to develop and implement strategies that deal with all issues surrounding teen parenthood, including prevention. Working with IHS, the Center for American Indian and Alaskan Native Health at Johns Hopkins University is currently providing outreach workers to tribal members of three Navajo units and the White Mountain Apache. The workers conduct a curriculum-based outreach program on healthy pregnancies and well-child care, which includes family planning on an individual basis. With partnerships and funding from the C.S. Mott Foundation and the Ford Foundation, they are now in the planning phase of a program expansion to include fathers and male outreach workers. Girl Neighborhood Power! - Building Bright Futures for Success (GNP). This five year national demonstration program, begun in 1997, centers on involving communities as active partners in helping girls (9-14 years old) successfully navigate adolescence and reach their maximum potential. Currently, the program consists of four community partners (Girls Inc. of Memphis, TN; Crispus Attucks of York, PA; City of Madison, WI; and Youth & Family Services Inc. of Rapid City, SD) and a national leadership consortium (Healthy Mothers, Health Babies Coalition, Inc. of Alexandria, VA). GNP encourages and supports partnerships at both the local and federal levels. To be eligible for funding, communities were required to demonstrate local commitment through a broad-based coalition of community agencies and parental involvement. In addition, GNP is supported by several HHS agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Public Health Service's Office of Women's Health, the Administration for Children and Families, and the Health Resources and Services Administration. This year, the community partners focused on strengthening local coalitions and neighborhood site development. Many valuable partnerships formed at the community level, for example, partnerships with the Association of Retarded Citizens, local churches, community centers, mental health providers, and local justice agencies. To reach its goal of promoting the well-being of girls, GNP will continue to build strong partnerships among a network of organizations and individuals in order to communicate positive messages and provide meaningful opportunities for girls. Additional information on the promising approaches being used by GNP can be found in the next section. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy. The CDC supports and works closely in partnership with thirteen communities with high rates of teen pregnancy. These demonstration projects, begun in 1995, are currently in their second phase. In this phase coalitions of local public and private agencies and community organizations are working together to implement their action plans, test promising interventions, build financial and programmatic sustainability, and conduct site-specific evaluations. CDC will continue to work with these innovative communities for the next several years. Further details about the promising approaches and evaluation efforts of this program will be discussed later in this report. Building and Sustaining Partnerships Report. To better understand the potential of partnerships to enhance teen pregnancy prevention efforts, HHS published "Building and Sustaining Community Partnerships for Teen Pregnancy Prevention." This report, issued by the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in July 1998, is based on an extensive literature review of various partnership relationships focusing on teenage pregnancy and other risk-taking behaviors. Research in the fields of violence prevention, substance abuse prevention, teen pregnancy prevention, youth development, community development, environmental protection, and general business enterprises were explored and reviewed. In addition, the report discusses the process of partnership development, including how to mobilize a community, organize, implement, and sustain a partnership, and provides models of community development and detailed case studies. By providing this publication, HHS hopes to assist in the development of teen pregnancy prevention partnerships across the country. Copies of this report are available at http://aspe.hhs.gov. Preventing Pregnancy through Youth Development. Published by the Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), "Preventing Adolescent Pregnancy: A Youth Development Approach", provides useful information and background on using a youth development approach with teen pregnancy prevention efforts. Topics discussed include: "Ideas for Getting Started" and " Building on Lessons Learned." This year, FYSB's National Clearinghouse on Families and Youth (NCFY) distributed over 5,000 copies of the guide to a diverse audience, including: federal, state, and local lawmakers, school representatives, private industry, non-profit organizations, and the academic community. In addition, NCFY produced an article based on this guide that was included in the December 1998 edition of the Preventing Pregnancy for Youth: An Interdisciplinary Newsletter (funded by the C.S. Mott Foundation). Copies of the book are available through the National Clearinghouse on Families and Youth at http://www.ncfy.com. HHS Partnerships In addition to working directly with communities to form partnerships, HHS frequently works on broader collaborative efforts to improve teen pregnancy prevention efforts. The following are highlights and updates of major partnership efforts by HHS over the past year. The Girl Power! Campaign. Since its formation in November 1996, the Girl Power! Campaign has successfully used multiple and varied partnerships to accomplish its goal of helping girls between the ages of 9 and 14 make the most of their lives. Because studies show that girls at this age have a tendency to neglect their own aspirations and interests, in addition to becoming less physically active, Girl Power! uses a comprehensive approach that addresses both health issues and the topics of self-worth, motivation, and opportunity. Given young girls' increased vulnerability at this stage to negative influences and mixed messages regarding health risk behaviors, the Girl Power! Campaign focuses on increasing their skills and competence in academics, arts, sports, and other beneficial activities. By encouraging girls to develop their skills and sense of self, Girl Power! hopes to decrease the likelihood that they will participate in risky and unhealthy behavior. As a multi-issue, national public education campaign, Girl Power!, led by the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention in the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, has partnered with many national non-profit organizations, including over sixty national endorsing organizations and 300 state and local affiliations, to develop and implement unique Campaign promotional materials, public service announcements, and an award-winning web site (http://www.health.org/gpower). The success of working together is evidenced by the thousands of Girl Power! community programs throughout the country. This year, the Girl Power! Campaign has formed many exciting partnerships to help promote its message. In cooperation with Girl Power!, the Girl Scouts of the USA developed an official Girl Power! Girl Scout patch and accompanying guides to be used as resources for earning the patch. Through a unique partnership with the Women's World Cup 1999, the campaign promoted and distributed Girl Power! products at selected matches through the 22-day soccer tournament held in the United States this summer. Other partnerships include the National Family Partnership, Avon Running, the WNBA's Washington Mystics basketball team, and the American Association of University Women. Future products of the Girl Power! Campaign include a Community Education Kit featuring resources for Girl Power! programs. The Girl Power! Campaign plans to continue working with various national, state, and local organizations to improve the future for all young girls. Joint Work Group on School-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention. With support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Adolescent and School Health, nine national non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are working together to help state and local education and health policy makers, school administrators, maternal and child health professionals, school health professionals, and other school personnel prevent unintended teen pregnancies. These organizations include the American Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), American Association of School Administrators (AASA), American School Health Association (ASHA), Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE), National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Education Association (NEA), and the National School Boards Association (NSBA). Through the Work Group, the NGOs and HHS learned about what their respective constituents needed to help schools implement effective teen pregnancy prevention programs. In its second year, the Work Group has been focusing on helping its constituents implement specific strategies to improve the effectiveness of programs such as collecting, interpreting, and disseminating epidemiological data about teen pregnancy; identifying effective school policies and programs; conducting outreach activities to parents, educators, and the public; helping schools engage parents in pregnancy prevention; helping schools work with community organizations in a shared effort; and helping schools implement youth development activities. SUPPORTING PROMISING APPROACHES In 1999, HHS provided support to efforts ongoing since the first year of the Strategy. The Department of Health and Human Services has continued to ensure that at least 25 percent of communities had teen pregnancy prevention programs in place-as mandated by section 905 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. In FY 1998, the Department estimated that of communities had teen pregnancy prevention programs in place. This is a conservative number because it represents only HHS- funded programs that flow directly to communities. HHS also supports other teen pregnancy prevention efforts through its various state block grant programs. In addition, there are numerous activities supported by funding sources outside of HHS. Highlights of HHS Activities. The National Strategy is built on the belief that successful teen pregnancy prevention efforts are specifically tailored to the unique needs, interests, and challenges of diverse individuals and communities. Although the National Strategy sends the strongest possible message to all teens that postponing sexual activity, staying in school, and preparing to work are the right things to do, the research has shown that girls and boys, for example, experience adolescence in different ways. Therefore, different approaches are required to meet the unique needs of different adolescent populations. This year the Department has continued to fund a broad spectrum of programs that actively involve family and community members, as well as young people themselves. In particular, HHS has promoted the involvement of boys and young men in teen pregnancy prevention. Abstinence Education The Department funds abstinence education through two programs. In 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) created a new program entitled the Abstinence Education Grant Program which is funded under Section 510 of Title V of the Social Security Act. The grants funded under this program must meet specific criteria defined in the legislation. In addition, the Department has been funding abstinence education through its Adolescent Family Life Program (AFL) since 1981. New AFL programs, initiated since 1997, now also conform to the PRWORA definition of abstinence. Abstinence Education Grant Program. The Department's Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) is responsible for the administration of the Abstinence Education Grant Program. The law provides for a mandatory annual appropriation of $50 million for each fiscal year (FY) 1998 through 2002. Fifty-two states and territories applied for and received FY 1999 funding (one less than in FY 1998). In March 1999, MCHB completed an annual program summary based on the states and territories' FY 1998 annual reports and FY 1999 grant applications. Multiple activities and contracts are being funded in the majority of states and territories. Thus, the following totals exceed the total number of states and territories (54) that received an FY 1998 and/or FY 1999 Abstinence Education Grant. While states and territories differed in their approaches, there were some general consistencies. The most frequently funded state/territory activities are community-based projects (45¹), program evaluations (41), state media campaigns (37), and technical assistance and training (36). The most frequently funded local program activities are adult mentoring, counseling and supervision (32), social skills instruction, character-based education, and assets building (31), curriculum development and implementation (31), school-based programs (26), public awareness campaigns (24), parent education groups (21), peer mentoring and education (20), and before- and after-school programs (18). The two age groups most frequently served by the states and territories are 13-14 year olds (51) and 9-12 year olds (50). Other frequently served age groups are 15-17 year olds (37) and 18-19 year olds (26). Special population groups frequently targeted by the states/territories are parents (39), at- risk populations, such as youth of color, out-of-school youths, and youths in areas with high rates of out-of-wedlock pregnancies (26), males (25), and teachers and youth serving professionals (20). Adolescent Family Life Program (AFL). As mentioned earlier, the AFL program's prevention approach, as required by statute, has always been abstinence-based; promoting the postponement of sexual activity as the most effective way for adolescents to prevent pregnancy and STD/HIV infection. In FY 1998, $9.0 million of the total $16.7 million AFL appropriation was spent to support 57 prevention projects using the abstinence-only definition under PRWORA. An additional $3.6 million was spent to continue support for 17 prevention and care projects originally funded in FY 1995 and $1.0 million to support seven research projects. Many address self-esteem and decision-making, life, social, and negotiation skills. Specific components for parent involvement and education are incorporated by most and all are required to include an independent evaluation. Family Planning The Department, through the Title X National Family Planning Program, is a primary provider of subsidized family planning services, serving nearly 4.5 million persons annually. The Title X program has always played an important role in adolescent pregnancy prevention; approximately 30 percent of those receiving services are under 20 years of age. In addition to clinical services, outreach and education - including counseling to encourage continued postponement of sexual activity for adolescent clients who are not yet sexually active - are also important components of Title X services for adolescents. The program has also been expanding Number of States and Territories adolescent pregnancy prevention through special initiatives sponsored regionally. For example: Region IV (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee) has been funding community-based organizations to implement adolescent pregnancy prevention initiatives. Interventions include sexuality education, parent involvement, mentoring, peer counseling, tutoring, job skills training, career planning and recreational activities in various combinations. Region VI (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas) has funded a number of programs to coordinate the linkage of family planning providers with community-based organizations that serve hard to reach populations, including adolescents, in providing appropriate services and activities related to family planning and reproductive health. All ten regions have been supporting projects in Title X clinics designed to increase male responsibility with respect to reproductive health and family planning and to enhance young men's futures through training and employment. Selected clinics employ adolescent males, as well as provide them with on the job training in various aspects of clinic operation, family planning, and reproductive health education. Community Collaboratives The Community Coalitions Partnership Program and Girl Neighborhood Power! are two of the Department's cornerstone programs aimed at reducing teen pregnancy. Over the course of this year, the communities involved in these two programs progressed in their efforts to develop and maintain multi-sectoral collaborations responsible for planning, implementing and evaluating prevention strategies. Since 1995, the CDC, through the Community Coalition Partnership Program for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy, has supported demonstration projects in thirteen communities with high rates of teen pregnancy (Boston, Chicago, Jacksonville, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Oklahoma City, Orlando, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Rochester, San Antonio, San Bernardino, and Yakima). Moreover, eleven of the thirteen communities are actively working with Latino youth and Latino neighborhoods as part of their overall plan to prevent teen pregnancy. In Phase II of the demonstration, which began in 1997 and continues for five years, coalitions of local public and private agencies and organizations in communities are working on implementing their action plans, field testing promising interventions, building toward financial and programmatic sustainability of their programs, conducting site-specific evaluations, and participating in cross-site evaluations. This year, each of the thirteen demonstration communities continued their efforts to develop and strengthen community-wide coalitions. They have continued to mobilize and organize community resources in support of comprehensive, risk-specific, effective and sustainable programs for the prevention of initial and repeat teen pregnancies. The communities are pursuing a wide variety of strategies to provide health, education, employment, recreation and other youth development services, programs and opportunities for youth and their families. Ongoing activities include: training for community leaders and neighborhood residents on community engagement and empowerment; the selection of intervention programs and components that address the documented needs and assets of specific neighborhoods; field testing of promising approaches; parent-child communication workshops; the development of youth councils; the use of health communications to enhance the planning and delivery of programs; and fund development to sustain programs. Girl Neighborhood Power! - Building Bright Futures for Success (GNP), a five-year national demonstration program that started October 1997, fits under the umbrella of the Department's Girl Power! campaign. Its several purposes include: (1) promoting the health and well-being of girls and young female adolescents between the ages of nine and fourteen; (2) preventing the onset of health risk behaviors among girls during their adolescence; (3) connecting girls and the communities in which they live and supporting the growth of girls' citizenship; (4) developing leadership skills in girls and young female adolescents; and (5) fostering communities' and neighborhoods' investments in their youth. The first year of this project included efforts to invest in neighborhood site development, to strengthen coalitions, and to develop a common process to monitor activities across sites. On average, the four neighborhood sites of each community partner enrolled about 50 girls (at least 200 girls per community partner) during the first project year. The racial and ethnic composition of participating girls varied by community site. Although each community partner's programming is unique, several common themes have emerged across sites in this past year. Each community partner has: developed mechanisms to help girls and their families identify physical and mental health needs, to enroll in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Programs, and to access appropriate health care services; convened an advisory council composed of girls; worked to help girls with their schoolwork and to feel connected to their schools (school success is protective against engagement in health risk behaviors and helps young people to thrive as adolescents and as adults); developed creative community service programs to enhance girls' connectedness to community, pride in citizenship, and leadership skills (examples include transforming a vacant lot into a community garden, gathering canned goods at Halloween ("trick or treat for others to eat"), developing public service announcements, and advocating for a Neighborhood Watch program); and incorporated field trips, which broaden girls' horizons, into its regular programming activities and developed sports programming activities to improve girls' opportunities for and attitudes toward physical activity. In addition to these two programs that target teen pregnancy, in 1998 the Family and Youth Services Bureau announced the award of more that $1 million in State Youth Development Collaboration Projects. FYSB awarded funding to nine states to develop and support innovative youth development strategies. Each of the following states received a grant of $120,000: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New York, and Oregon. The grants will support efforts that focus on all youth, including vulnerable youth in at-risk situations. Youth development programs have been shown to promote youth self-efficacy, build competencies and encourage young people to delay childbearing. Each state has designed a unique plan for implementing the project on the basis of identified youth needs and prior state activities with regard to youth development. Programs for Boys and Young Men Traditionally, adolescent pregnancy prevention research and programs have focused on adolescent girls. It has become increasingly clear, however, that adolescent boys and young men must share that focus. The National Strategy along with the Administration's Fatherhood Initiative have continued to work on ways to expand the Department's efforts to target boys and young men. In 1998, the Office of Population Affairs funded several research grants aimed at improving the knowledge of what works in male involvement by developing new program models. This year, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) funded a project to identify abstinence programs for males, and also supported several meetings to synthesize what is known thus far about male involvement programs. Title X Male Involvement Grants. In FY 1998, the Office of Population Affairs funded ten research grants, through the Title X Family Planning Program, to support community-based organizations in developing, implementing, and testing approaches for involving young men in family planning education and reproductive health services programs. Research has shown that young men recognize unintended pregnancy as a serious problem and its prevention as a joint responsibility; nevertheless, drawing them into family planning/reproductive health information and service programs continues to be difficult. This year, the grantees completed their program development and began implementing new approaches to bringing family planning services and education components into programs where young males were already receiving other health, education, and social services. While each program reflects the specific needs of its community, several themes predominate the interventions. Because most of the programs place significant emphasis on the role of adult men as guides, teachers or examples for younger men in their transition to adulthood, nearly every program is anchored on a strong mentoring component. This component is then often paired with community, cultural and recreational activities, as well as life skills instruction. (Several sites are using the nationally-known Wise Guys curriculum, while others have developed their own curricula for life skills and reproductive health education.) In addition, these programs have seen both the benefit and the appeal of youth development activities. Components such as academic tutoring, sports, and talent shows are used as incentives to draw young men into the project. Finally, some of the grant programs are targeting specific populations such as the Latino community by using culturally appropriate services and language. Abstinence Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs Focusing on Males. Consistent with the Department's focus on abstinence education, ASPE commissioned a paper, written by the South Carolina State University Policy Analysis Consortium, to identify and describe existing abstinence programs targeting boys and young men. The study will identify 66 programs that provide either abstinence-based (40%) or abstinence only (60%) programming to boys and girls or to boys only. The authors found that the majority of abstinence programs serve 9 to 14 year old boys. The most frequently used service approaches were teen support groups and mentoring types of activities as well as parent/teen classes. The matrix of existing programs will be published and will be regularly updated with new and promising strategies for reaching boys and young men with an abstinence message. A final report will be available in the Fall of 1999. Federal, State, and Local Strategies for Promoting Male Involvement in Teen Pregnancy Prevention. The Department sponsored several meetings to identify innovative male involvement strategies that might be disseminated to a larger audience. The meeting results are being summarized in a report that outlines multi-pronged strategies for reaching a much wider population. The report draws upon the experiences of numerous local and one statewide (California) male involvement initiatives. The report will first identify "stakeholder" audiences whose activities stand to benefit from male involvement and who have resources, networks and capacities to help promote and strengthen it. These audiences include: (1) regional, state and local public officials administering family planning, maternal and child health, education and family/social service programs; (2) teen pregnancy prevention programs; (3) responsible fatherhood programs; (4) community-based reproductive health programs; and (5) male serving programs in the armed services, juvenile justice, prison systems, and youth development and recreation programs. Specific strategies designed to inform and collaborate with these stakeholder audiences and other community-based partners include creative use of the media and social marketing, regional and state forums and summits, peer-to-peer networking opportunities and technical assistance. The goal is to promote and support a view of boys and men wherever they live, learn, work or play as responsible members of families--sons, fathers, spouses, grandfathers. The report (available in the Fall, 1999) will outline some inherent tensions and barriers to promoting male involvement and discusses the most critical challenge to be faced--identifying state and national leaders and vehicles to coordinate and steer the wide ranging efforts needed to effectively promote male involvement. Welfare Reform Welfare reform included an incentive for states to reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock childbearing and encourage the development of new approaches to pregnancy prevention. The Bonus to Reward Decrease in Illegitimacy Ratio will reward those states with the largest decrease in the ratio of out-of-wedlock to total births, provided they also show a decrease in abortion rate relative to 1995. The bonus will be awarded in FY 1999 through 2002, based on data releases from NCHS. This provision is targeted toward all women, not just teenage mothers; however, in measuring state decreases in out-of-wedlock births, this measure would also include births among unmarried teens. Although the bonus is part of the TANF grant, the funds can be used to support a wide variety of programs extending beyond the TANF population. In addition, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is supporting an initiative on teen parents and welfare reform that generates knowledge on the effects of welfare reform on parenting teens, and measures the effects of preventive interventions on teen parents and their children. The four objectives in support of this goal are: (1) prevention or reduction of alcohol, tobacco, and drug use; (2) improvement in academic performance; (3) reduction of subsequent pregnancies; and (4) improvement in life skills and general well-being. SAMHSA has awarded ten cooperative agreements which are in the process of collecting baseline data for the evaluation of the initiative. RESEARCH AND EVALUATION ACTIVITIES Research Activities-From Data Collection to Findings In the past year, the Department has continued its commitment to support research related to teen pregnancy. This commitment includes investment in long-term research to follow trends in important areas. With such a commitment, many of the Department's activities reported here are continuations of research initially highlighted in last year's report. Areas of research include: Adolescent sexual activity Timing of first intercourse Use of contraceptives Intent to become pregnant Adolescent decision making Male Involvement Data Collection. While often overlooked, the data sets used to conduct research in the area of teen pregnancy are vital to the Department's mission to prevent teen pregnancy. To conduct quality research, the Department has invested resources to gather and maintain high-quality, comprehensive data. These data serve as a critical foundation for the information we now have with regard to teen pregnancy and for the information we will need in the future. A brief description of each data set is in Appendix IV. Research Activities. The Department's research activities cover a wide spectrum of topics. Continuing research on the sexual activity of adolescents allows for an understanding of the patterns of sexual behavior. Examinations of whether and which adolescents intend to become pregnant or cause a young woman to become pregnant clarifies how adolescents feel about becoming pregnant and has important implications for the decisions they make, their physical and emotional well-being, and potentially for the well-being of their children. Research funding is also spent in designing, implementing and evaluating pregnancy prevention programs, so that resources may be used to replicate programs that are demonstrably effective. Adolescent decision making impacts on many risk-behaviors, including sexual activity and contraceptive use, and is a vital factor not only in understanding how and why teens become or make someone pregnant. Knowledge of how adolescents make decisions also enhances the ability to create effective prevention and intervention programs. Research on male involvement in teen pregnancy highlights the role, often ignored, that men have in sexual, romantic, marital and parenting relationships. The couple relationship, as well as peer relationships, have important influences on sexual risk behaviors. Adolescent Sexual Activity. Research supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) indicates that, between 1988 and 1995, a decrease has occurred in the proportion of teenagers aged 15-19 who had ever had sexual intercourse¹. This decline occurred primarily among young men²⁻³. Research conducted by the NCHS revealed that the levels for young women remained stable²⁻³. These trends are departures from trends since the early 1970s, which had been toward increasing percents of sexually experienced teens. Young Women's First Intercourse. NCHS and other researchers have found that many teenage girls are ambivalent about their first intercourse. More complete knowledge about adolescents' feelings about their first intercourse may help understand its timing, and clarify relationships between sexual initiation, contraceptive use, and teenage pregnancy. 4 Among women who had their first intercourse at age 13 or younger, 24 percent report the experience to have been non-voluntary, compared with 10 percent of those who were between 19-24 at first premarital intercourse. Yet, women's experiences are not simply voluntary or non-voluntary. Women were asked to rate, on a scale of 1-10; how much they wanted their first intercourse to occur. About one-quarter of respondents who reported their first intercourse as voluntary also rated it as more unwanted than wanted. Women whose first partner was seven or more years older than themselves were more than twice as likely as those whose first partner was the same age or younger to rate it more unwanted than wanted (36 percent VS. 17 percent). These same women were also less likely than other women to have used contraceptives at first intercourse. Contraceptive Use. Research supported by NCHS indicates that the principal trend in contraceptive method choice in 1988-1995 was an increase in condom use, especially among black, Hispanic, or unmarried women under the age of 25. The increase in condom use at first intercourse, which dramatically increased in the 1980s and 1990s, was accompanied by a decrease in use of other methods that do not prevent HIV and STDs.⁵ Twenty-four percent of all black teens using contraception were using injectable or implant contraception, methods which are very effective against pregnancy. 5 The use of injectable and implant contraception may help to explain the decline in the second and higher order birth rates for teen mothers - teens who already had a child. This adoption of injectable and implant contraception and the increase in condom use at first intercourse and afterward may have been important factors in the sharp decline in black teen birth rates. 3,6 For white teens, declines in current sexual activity as well as the increases in condom use may be significant factors in declines in birth rates For further information, please see Appendix I. Unintended Pregnancies. Research conducted by the NCHS indicates that a large proportion of recent pregnancies to women of all ages in the United States -- over 50 percent are unintended even though contraceptives are widely available and widely used.⁷ Unintended pregnancies that were wanted, but came too soon, or that were not wanted at all, are associated with a woman's attitudes about her pregnancy at the time it was conceived. The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) (see Appendix IV), which has long been the principal national source of information on intended and unintended pregnancy in the United States, traditionally classifies women's pregnancies as intended, mistimed, or unwanted. To study whether young women were having inconsistent feelings about pregnancy, researchers developed a set of scales to measure these feelings.⁸ The scales were used to show a woman's positive, negative, or conflicting (ambivalent) feelings about her pregnancy and were compared with the traditional measures of unintended pregnancies. Though she may not have actively wanted to get pregnant at the time she did, the young woman may have felt some attraction to what being pregnant would add to her life, for example, looking forward to the new experiences that having a baby would bring. These results affirm the impressions of many service providers that the strength of the motivation to prevent pregnancy, or ambivalence about preventing it, is a prime determinant of both the likelihood of getting pregnant and how effectively contraceptives are used among young and teenaged unmarried women. By measuring ambivalent feelings, service providers may be able to better address teen's feelings and concerns about pregnancy and contraception. Many unintended pregnancies are pregnancies toward which the mother's attitude was not entirely negative as measured in a new series of questions asked of teens and young women under age 25 in the 1995 wave of the NSFG. In 1995, as in 1988 and 1982, teenaged women had high levels of unintended pregnancy (about 78 percent of recent pregnancies in 1994)¹⁰ Teens 15-19 years of age were also more likely to have lower values on a "happiness to be pregnant" scale, which suggests that they had stronger negative or ambivalent feelings about their pregnancies than young women ages 20-24. Overall, the greatest amount of ambivalence was shown by teen women 15-19 years old. Adolescent Decision Making. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) funded a workshop in January, 1998 which was convened by the Board on Children, Youth, and Families (a joint activity of the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine) to explore the role that decision making plays in adolescents' involvement in high-risk behaviors. The changes associated with adolescence, including physical, cognitive, social, and emotional growth, impact decision making. Cognitive changes create an increased capacity for more complex and abstract reasoning. Social cognition-the way one thinks about one's social world, the people with whom one interacts, and the groups in which one participates-may change from adolescence to adulthood. External factors, such as the media-television, radio, movies, music videos-may influence decision making by helping to set both positive and negative social norms. Research examined at this workshop can assist those involved in the development of programs designed to prevent health risk behaviors. Research on drug use prevention programs, for example, has found that promising programs: (1) are long term, (2) are designed to counter social influences, (3) begin in elementary or middle school, and (4) are supplemented by booster sessions throughout the high school years. Programs may not explicitly use a decision-making model, yet may incorporate decision-making skills such as providing information that teenagers need for effective decision making in a clear and personalized way; encouraging teenagers to take responsibility for their actions and to analyze their options; and showing adolescents how to discuss decisions in a group setting. The report is available on the web at http://aspe.hhs.gov. Male Involvement. Research on male involvement is another important piece of the Department's research focus on teen pregnancy. Examples of programs in this area are highlighted in the section "Supporting Promising Approaches." Including males in the examination of teen pregnancy means investigating how men feel about their sexuality and sexual relationships, attitudes of males regarding what it means to be a man, and attitudes towards and use of contraceptives. Further, male involvement can incorporate issues not directly involving sexuality such as family relationships and parenting, career and educational goals and opportunities among a host of other issues that directly affect young men in the United States. One area of research in this area is the expansion of the NSFG (see Appendix IV for details on the current NSFG). The 6th cycle of the NSFG, due to be conducted in 2001 will include, for the first time, a national sample of men 15-49 years of age. It is anticipated that the expanded survey will be done every 3-4 years instead of every 6-7 years to more accurately monitor trends. Future improvements under consideration are to include populations of men who are often excluded from national surveys: the military and prisoners. These improved data can be expected to yield reliable national estimates of male sexual behavior and contraceptive use, attitudes toward marriage, cohabitation and fatherhood, extent to which births are wanted by males, and father-child contact and the father's role in raising his children. Further, these data are expected to allow for examinations of similarities and differences in attitudes and behaviors between men and women and subgroups of men and women. Attitudes Towards Sexual Activity. Small research projects funded at the NIH are addressing adolescents' attitudes toward sexuality. Data collected under the AddHEALTH project (see Appendix IV) are demonstrating, among other things, that a young person's public profession of an intention to remain virgin does have a strong effect upon that person's abstaining from sex for the next year, even when controlling for other influences such as family structure, religiosity, and school success. Other researchers are able to examine how the strength of young people's sense of connection to school and family protect against initiating health risk behaviors, including early and unprotected sex. Evaluation-Assessing Promising Approaches The Department continues to be committed to learning what approaches have an effect on teen pregnancy and its related antecedents so that better interventions can be effectively designed. HHS continues to support ongoing evaluations and seeks to incorporate evaluation in HHS funded demonstration projects and programs. To expand knowledge in this area, the Department supports a number of efforts. Abstinence-Only Education Programs-National Evaluation. The Department, through the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), is responsible for conducting an evaluation of the state abstinence-only education grants described in the Promising Approaches section of this report. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 set aside funding to evaluate a select number of sites receiving funding from this program. In August, 1998, a contract was awarded for a three-year multi-site effort to improve knowledge about programs aimed at preventing teen sexual activity and its negative consequences. The process of site selection is well underway and is expected to be completed by the summer of 1999. Data collection will begin in the fall of 1999. The evaluation will focus on approximately six sites: five sites will involve random assignment experiments of particular programs and one site will involve a rigorous evaluation of a comprehensive community approach to abstinence-only education. Outcomes of interest will include--but will not be limited to--the four performance measures identified in the Department's program guidance. These four measures are: The rate of pregnancy to teenagers aged 15 to 17 The proportion of adolescents aged 17 years and younger who engage in sexual intercourse The incidence of sexually transmitted diseases among youths aged 15-19 The rate of births to teenagers aged 15-17 Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Program Evaluation. Much remains to be learned about what works to prevent teen pregnancy. Before large scale pregnancy prevention initiatives can be implemented, current knowledge about pregnancy prevention programs needs to be expanded to delineate which strategies are the most promising, which aspects of which programs demonstrate the strongest impact, and which programs are successful in affecting behavior across various communities and population characteristics, such as ethnicity and socio-economic status. To contribute to the expansion of this knowledge base, ASPE provided grants to enhance three existing evaluations of teen pregnancy prevention interventions that were rigorous in design and already had funding. The following are brief descriptions of these three evaluations. California Adolescent Sibling Pregnancy Prevention Program (UCSD) Researchers from the University of California, San Diego are evaluating the California Adolescent Sibling Pregnancy Prevention Program (CASSP) which targets the siblings of pregnant and parenting teens. The evaluation is providing important information about a significant subpopulation of girls who have been shown to be at elevated risk for teen pregnancy. There are two goals to the enhanced evaluation: (1) to analyze the differential impact of specific services and (2) to analyze community level factors that may be contributing to the risk of pregnancy for this population. The research around these two questions should add meaningfully to the knowledge base about solid teen pregnancy prevention practices. Basic knowledge about the high risk of the siblings of pregnant and parenting teens was funded under an earlier NIH grant. Inwood House Inwood House is a well-established agency in New York City that has long-established pregnancy prevention programs as well as an array of services for pregnant and parenting adolescents in middle through senior high school. The research team is currently comparing three differing levels of intervention (and no intervention) with respect to outcomes for students transitioning into high school. One of the interventions is an abstinence plus program funded by the AFL program. The researchers are using ASPE funds to improve the quality of the abstinence program's comparison group while establishing comparison groups for the other two levels of intervention. This enhanced study will provide an important comparison of interventions provided by the same agency, and undergirded by the same philosophical approach toward working with adolescents. The interventions differ in their emphasis on abstinence and in the breadth and intensity of services they provide. Institute for Health Policy Studies (UCSF) The Center for Reproductive Health Policy Research, at the Institute for Health Policy Studies (UCSF), is conducting a large scale evaluation of the California Community Challenge Grant Program. This program funds 112 sites in the state to provide services to pregnant and parenting teens and teen pregnancy prevention programs. Each site has implemented its own program and is given a choice of a variety of modules to complete process, outcome or impact evaluations. This has allowed the Center to provide an alternative to the "one size fits all" evaluation approach which would be less appropriate for these community-driven programs. The enhancement of the evaluation is developing comparison groups for these communities. Community Coalition Partnerships Program. CDC's 13 community demonstration projects, described previously, are conducting site-specific evaluations, and participating in cross-site evaluations. These evaluations include process and progress evaluation, and additionally, in six of the communities, enhanced evaluations of the impact of the program, or of specific program components. Process and Progress Indicators. Each of the demonstration sites is engaged in efforts to monitor its process and progress. In partnership with CDC and the Academy for Educational Development, the demonstration sites have collectively defined Cross Site Process Indicators for Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention in the following areas: (1) needs and assets assessment; (2) health outcomes; (3) defining the program; (4) project administration; (5) positioning for financial sustainability. The analysis of the cross-site indicators over the life of the project will enhance the communities' capacity to evaluate and strengthen their programs. Furthermore, the documentation of these aspects of program development may also benefit other communities seeking to address teen pregnancy. Enhanced Evaluation Activities. Six of the 13 communities receive supplemental funding to support evaluations of the impact and outcome the demonstration projects have had in their communities. The studies underway include the following: Longitudinal study measuring the timing and frequency with which youth use the activities and services supported by the coalitions. An examination of changes in birth and STD rates in school populations based on whether the schools are in an intervention or comparison area. Annual surveys of adult knowledge, attitudes and behaviors with regards to youth development activities and issues in the intervention and comparison communities. Longitudinal study of parents and their children who participate in parent-child communication programs to assess changes in communication and connectedness. Survey of households in intervention and comparison communities assessing community and neighborhood resources, family and youth assets, and adolescent risk behaviors to assess changes in inter-organizational relationships among key community agencies in intervention and comparison communities. Girl Neighborhood Power! (GNP) Evaluation. The GNP initiative, described earlier in this report, has also stressed the importance of evaluation. Each project is responsible for developing and implementing its own evaluation for determining how successfully it has achieved its goals and objectives. In addition, the sites have together developed and agreed on the use of a common form to document and monitor project activities. Supplemental funding is being provided by the Office on Women's Health so that community partners will be able to use a common set of variables to explore how they influenced participating girls and their families, to measure the degree of community investment in programming for girls, and to explore how their projects' activities have affected participating neighborhoods. 1 Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS. Piccinino LJ. Fertility, Family Planning, and Women's Health: New Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, No. 19. 1997. 2 Abma JC. Sonenstein FL. Teenage Sexual Behavior and Contraceptive Use: An Update. Paper presented at Conference: " Teenage Sexual Activity and Contraceptive Use: An Update," at the American Enterprise Institute Welfare Reform Academy, May I, 1998. 3 Sonenstein FL, Ku L. Lindberg LD, Turner DF, Pleck JH. Changes in Sexual Behavior and Condom Us Among Teenaged Males: 1988 to 1995. AJPH 88(6):956-959. 1998. 4 Abma JC, Driscoll A, Moore K. Young Women's Degree of Control Over First Intercourse: An Exploratory Analysis. Family Planning Perspectives 30(1): 12-18. 1998. 5 Piccinino LJ, Mosher WD. Trends in Contraceptive Use in the United States: 1982-1995. Family Planning Perspectives 30(1):4-10, 46. 1998. 6 Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Curtin SC. Declines in Teenage Birth Rates, 1991-97: National and State Patterns. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 12. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. 7 Piccinino, LJ. Unintended Pregnancy and Childbearing. In: Wilcox, LS and Marks, JS, eds. From Data to Action. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pp. 73-82. 1994. 8 Adler, NE. Unwanted Pregnancy and Abortion -- Definition and Research Issues. Journal of Social Issues 48 (3). 1992. 9 Piccinino, L, Peterson, LS. Ambivalent Attitudes and Unintended Pregnancy. In: Severy, L and Miller, W, eds. Advances in Population, Vol. 3. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd., 227-249. 1999. 10 Henshert, SK. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 30 (1):24-29,46. 1998. APPENDIX II Measuring the Proportion of Communities with Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs Recent declines in the teen birth rate, and indications of further declines in the teen pregnancy rate, suggest that the numerous public- and private-sector efforts across the country to prevent teen pregnancy are having a positive impact. Measuring all factors that help adolescents postpone premature sexual activity and avoid pregnancy is difficult, however, since individual, family, and community characteristics are all influential. Nevertheless, measuring the proportion of communities that have at least one teen pregnancy prevention program in place (estimated by dividing the number of such communities by the number of communities in the United States) provides a rough sense of how many communities are responding to this problem with specific, targeted prevention efforts. In 1997, at least 31 percent of communities had HHS-supported teen pregnancy prevention and related programs. To develop a sound, albeit conservative, estimate of this proportion, the estimate includes only those programs supported by HHS. HHS-supported programs which include teen pregnancy prevention services as a component are diverse, ranging from comprehensive health and social services to substance abuse treatment and HIV prevention education. In this report, the number of teen pregnancy prevention programs funded by HHS includes those programs funded in the year FY 1998 (including the latest year for which complete information on grants awarded is available). To determine the number of communities with at least one program, the location of each program was identified based on the site of the services provided and/or the location of the grant recipient. A community with more than one program was counted only once. The estimate excludes HHS funding provided directly to states (e.g., Medicaid, Maternal and Child Health Block Grant) which states may use to fund activities in multiple communities. Since there is no single standard definition for community in the United States, the estimate uses a definition of community based on areas identified by the Commerce Department's Bureau of the Census. This definition includes all incorporated places with a population of 10,000 individuals or more (2,673) and all counties where, excluding these incorporated places, the remaining population reaches 10,000 or more (2,079), for a total of 4,752 communities. Under this definition, for example, Montgomery County, Maryland would consist of four communities, including three incorporated places of 10,000 or more inhabitants (Gaithersburg, Rockville, and Takoma Park) and one community representing the balance of the county's population, which exceeds 10,000. Using these calculations, the resulting estimate of the proportion of communities in the United States with HHS-supported teen pregnancy prevention and related programs is at least XXX percent for FY 1998. This proportion represents about XXX communities across the country. Appendix II I APPENDIX III HHS Activities The Department of Health and Human Services supports a variety of efforts to help communities develop comprehensive teen pregnancy prevention strategies that reflect five principles: parental and adult involvement, abstinence and personal responsibility, clear strategies for the future, community involvement, and a sustained commitment. HHS Programs State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) was established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 under Title XXI of the Social Security Act. This program, administered by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), enables states to provide health insurance coverage to uninsured targeted low-income children. States have the opportunity to involve communities as they design and implement their CHIP programs so that the new programs, including teen pregnancy prevention programs, may be an additional avenue to provide services to adolescents at risk. As of April 1999, 53 states, territories, and the District of Columbia have submitted CHIP plans, of which 51 have been approved. The submitted plans include 27 Medicaid expansions, 14 separate State Child Health plans, and 12 combination plans. The Abstinence Only Education Program was part of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 to enable states to provide abstinence education through activities such as mentoring, counseling, and adult supervision designed to promote abstinence from sexual activity until marriage. The program, administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), has a mandatory appropriation of $50 million for each Fiscal Year from 1998 through 2002. The Girl Neighborhood Power! - Building Bright Futures for Success is challenging America's communities to become active partners in assisting 9- to 14-year-old girls to successfully navigate adolescence and achieve maximum potential. The initiative, administered by HRSA, strives to combine several elements including strong "no use" messages about tobacco alcohol, and illicit drugs with an emphasis on physical activity, nutrition, abstinence, mental health, social development, and future careers. The Center for Disease Control's Community Coalition Partnership Program for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy has supported demonstration grants for the prevention of teen pregnancies in 13 communities in 11 states since 1995. Coalitions of local and public and private agencies and organizations in communities with high rates of teen pregnancy have been working over the last two years to develop community action plans, coordinate efforts to reduce teen pregnancy, identify gaps in current programs and services, target existing resources, and design evaluation plans. CDC awarded approximately $250,000 per year for two years to 13 communities in 11 states to help these communities mobilize and organize their resources to support effective and sustainable teen pregnancy prevention programs. For FY 1998, a total of $13.7 million was made available to help the 13 community Appendix III - 1 coalition partnerships implement their action plans and evaluate their impact, as well as to support related data collection, evaluation, and dissemination activities. Reproductive Health and Family Planning Services (under Title X of the Public Health Service Act) are provided to nearly 5 million persons each year, nearly one third of whom are under 20 years of age. Abstinence counseling and education are an important part of the Title X service protocol for adolescent clients. These services are provided by 84 grantees with more than 4,000 clinic locations. These sites offer reproductive health services including pregnancy prevention, family planning, and diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases, either on site or by referral. The program has also launched an adolescent male initiative called the "Young Men/Family Planning Partnership Training Program." Under this initiative, Title X clinics employ male high school students as interns while also providing training in clinic operation and peer education; assisting in identifying career paths in allied health and related occupations; and increasing their use of services in a family planning setting. Healthy Schools, Healthy Communities, a Health Resources and Services Administration program created in 1994, has established school-based health centers in 26 communities in 20 states to serve the health and education needs of children and youth at high risk for poor health, teenage pregnancy, and other problems. For the first three years of the program, $1 million each year was provided to fund health education and promotion programs that were coordinated with the health services grants. The Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) (under Title XX of the Social Security Act) provides funding to prevent, reduce, or eliminate dependency; achieve or maintain self-sufficiency; prevent neglect, abuse, or exploitation of children and adults; prevent or reduce inappropriate institutional care; and provide admission or referral for institutional care when other forms of care are inappropriate. SSBG Grants are made directly to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to fund social services tailored to meet the needs of individuals and families residing within each jurisdiction. The Community Services Block Grant, which operates in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the territories, enables local community agencies to provide low-income populations, including youth at risk, with job counseling, summer youth employment, GED instruction, crisis hotlines, information and referral to health care, and other services. The Independent Living Program, run by the Administration for Children and Families, provides funds to states to support activities ranging from educational programs to programs that help young people who are making the transition from foster care to independent living to avoid early parenthood. This program supports activities in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Youth Programs including Runaway and Homeless Youth Programs, Transitional Living Programs, and the Youth Sports Program, address a wide range of risk factors for teen pregnancy. Together, these programs operate in 500 communities in 50 states and the District of Columbia. Appendix III - 2 Healthy Start, administered by HRSA, has 62 projects to reduce infant mortality in the highest- risk areas and to improve the health and well-being of women, infants, and their families. Among a broad array of services provided (including state prenatal hotlines), thousands of teenagers participate in prevention programs exclusively designed for adolescents. The programs encourage healthy lifestyles, youth empowerment, sexual responsibility, conflict resolution, goal setting, and the enhancement of self-esteem. Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant (Title V) funds support a variety of adolescent health programs in 57 states and jurisdictions, including adolescent pregnancy prevention programs, state adolescent health coordinators, family planning, technical assistance, and other prevention services. The Adolescent Family Life Program (AFL), created in 1981, supports research into the causes and consequences of adolescent pregnancy; demonstration projects that provide health, education, and social services to pregnant and parenting adolescents, their children, male partners, and families; and programs aimed at promoting abstinence among pre-adolescents and adolescents as the most effective way of preventing adolescent pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV/AIDS. In FY 1997, the AFL program funded 83 projects in 37 states and the District of Columbia. AFL is administered by the Office of Population Affairs. Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities in 105 rural and urban areas in 43 states and the District of Columbia have been awarded grants to stimulate economic and human development and to coordinate and expand support services. As they implement their strategic plans, some sites are including a focus on teenage pregnancy prevention and youth development. Health Education in Schools supports the efforts of every state and territorial education agency to implement local school health programs to prevent the spread of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Assistance is also provided to 13 states to build an infrastructure for school health programs. Efforts are targeted at preventing early sexual activity, STDs, HIV, drug and alcohol abuse, tobacco use, and injuries. Community and Migrant Health Centers, including family and neighborhood health centers, operate in 3,032 community-based sites through 685 center grantees in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and six territories. The centers provide primary and specialized health and related services to medically-underserved adolescents. Some centers include special hours or clinics for adolescent patients. Indian Health Service (IHS) provides a full range of medical services for American Indians and Alaska Natives. IHS supports projects targeted at preventing teenage pregnancy, and its prevention and treatment programs also have a special emphasis on youth substance abuse, child abuse, and women's health care. Appendix III - 3 Drug Treatment and Prevention Programs include services to prevent first time and repeat pregnancies among teenagers. One hundred twenty-two residential substance abuse treatment programs for pregnant and postpartum women, as well as for women with dependent children, receive support to provide family planning, education, and counseling services in 39 states, the District of Columbia, and the Virgin Islands. Also, 25 programs to prevent substance use and other adverse life outcomes serve high-risk female teens in 13 states and the District of Columbia. Health Care and Promotion under Medicaid provides Medicaid-eligible adolescents under age 21 with access to a comprehensive range of preventive, primary, and specialty services within its Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program. The Medicaid program also funds family planning services at an enhanced match rate for states. The federal government pays 90 percent of state expenditures for Medicaid family planning services, while the state funds the remaining 10 percent. The enhanced match encourages states to fund family planning programs which include patient counseling and education concerning pregnancy prevention and reproductive health. Appendix III - 4 APPENDIX IV HHS Funded Data Sets NSFG-National Survey of Family Growth. The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), is based on personal interviews with a national sample of women 15-44 years of age in the United States. Its main function is to collect data on factors affecting pregnancy and child bearing. Please see http://www.cdc.gov/nchswww/about/major/nsfg/nsfg.htm for more information. NSAM-National Survey of Adolescent Males. The National Survey of Adolescent Males (NSAM), conducted by the Urban Institute and supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), provides data exclusively on teenage males ages 15-19, specifically their contraceptive and sexual behavior. This data set complements the data on teenage females which is available from the NSFG. Please see http://silk.nih.gov/silk/DBSB/nsam.htm for more information. Add Health-National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), conducted by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina and supported by the NICHD and seventeen other federal agencies, is a school based study of adolescents in grades 7 to12 which provides information on physical, mental, and emotional health status, and health behaviors, including sexual behavior and contraceptive use. It provides the first comprehensive view of the health and health behaviors of adolescents and the antecedents-personal, interpersonal, familial, and environmental-of these outcomes. This study will follow-up with these young people in to their late teens and early 20s. Please see http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth/ for more information. YRBSS-Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), monitors the prevalence of youth behaviors that most influence health. This national school-based survey focuses on priority health-risk behaviors established during youth that result in the most significant mortality, morbidity, disability, and social problems during both youth and adulthood. Please see http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/yrbs/ov.htm for more information. NLSY-National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The NLSY, supported by the NICHD and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is a national sample of approximately 12,000 men and women who were aged 14-21 in 1979. The sample is oversampled for the black and Hispanic population. Data have been collected annually through 1994 and every other year beginning in 1996 on topics which include employment, fertility, marriage, divorce, child care, and infant health. In 1986, and biannually since then, data were collected from and about the children of the female respondents. Please see http://stats.bls.gov/nlshome.htm for more information. NVSS- National Vital Statistics System. The National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), operated by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), CDC, is based on the collection of individual record data for every birth registered in the United States. Data are collected by each State and transmitted to NCHS through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program (VSCP). Under this program, NCHS partially supports State costs of producing vital statistics through a contract with each State. Please see http://www.cdc.gov/nchswww/about/major/natality/natality.htm. for more information. Appendix IV - 1 10/25/99 09:48 FAX 002 001. 22' 99 (FRI) 17:06 OASPA NEWS DIV TEL: 202 690 6247 P. 002 fele teen HHS NEWS pregnancy U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: NCHS/CDC Press Office Monday, Oct. 25, 1999 (301) 436-7551 CDC Media Relations (404) 639-3286 NEW GUIDE TO HELP LOCAL COMMUNITIES ESTABLISH TEEN PREGNANCY PREVENTION PROGRAMS HHS Secretary Donna E. Shalala released a new guide today to help communities and non- profit organizations establish successful local teen pregnancy prevention programs. The comprehensive guide, developed by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, will be distributed nationwide for local health organizations' use. Titled Get Organized: A Guide to Preventing Teen Pregnancy, the publication stresses a localized approach, a long-term commitment, and careful evaluation. It also provides novel approaches for addressing teen pregnancy, including ways to involve faith leaders and the business community, suggestions on how to target young men in prevention efforts, and mechanisms for channeling community views on pregnancy prevention into effective, localized strategies for addressing the overall issue. "We've seen a continued decline in teen pregnancy and teen birth rates in the last several years, which has been very encouraging," Secretary Shalala said. "But we can't afford to stop our efforts now-too many teenagers are still jeopardizing their futures. By making this guide available to local communities, we hope to strengthen existing teen pregnancy prevention programs-and build others-that will coach girls and boys with common sense guidance, positive alternatives and the emotional support it takes to stand up to peer pressure." According to a new report released today by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), the teen birth rate is at its lowest level since_1987. After years of rising rates, teen births began to decline in 1991, continuing to decline every year and falling another 2 percent in 1998. Declines have been particularly marked in younger teens, with the birth rate for teenagers 15-17 years dropping 5 percent for 1998 to a record low of 30.4 per 1,000. Despite this decline, however, four out of 10 American girls get pregnant at least once before they turn 20, leading to more than 900,000 teen pregnancies a year. Today's guide is a three-volume publication that includes strategies for collecting basic data, reaching out to religious leaders, raising money and conducting program evaluation. "The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy was created in response to the President and Vice President's challenge to parents and leaders all across our country," Secretary Shalala said. "The message was clear: winning the fight against teen pregnancy isn't the sole responsibility of parents, religion, school or the government. Winning this crusade is everyone's job-and the only way we'll win is if all of us join together." - More - 10/25/99 09:48 FAX 003 DT. 22' 99 (FRI) 17:06 OASPA NEWS DIV TEL: 202 690 6247 P. 003 - 2 - The NCHS report also contains state-by-state data for 1991-1997. That data show that teen birth rates have declined in every state and the declines have exceeded 20 percent in ten states and the District of Columbia. Founded in 1996, the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy is a nonprofit, non- partisan initiative supported almost entirely by private donations. The campaign's mission is to prevent teen pregnancy by supporting values and stimulating actions that are consistent with a pregnancy-free adolescence. The campaign's goal is to reduce the teen pregnancy rate by one-third between 1996 and 2005. Copies of today's report can be viewed or downloaded on the NCHS Home Page at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs. ### Note: For other HHS Press Releases and Fact Sheets pertaining to the subject of this announcement, please visit our Press Release and Fact Sheet search engine at: http://www.dhhs.gov/news/press/ 10/25/99 09:48 FAX 004 10/25/99 08:07 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P002/011 National Vital Statistics Reports NUSS nchs From the CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION MIDO National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System Volume 47, Number 26 October 25, 1999 Declines in Teenage Birth Rates, 1991-98: Update of National and State Trends by Stephanie J. Ventura, M.A., T. J. Mathews, M.S., and Sally C. Curtin, M.A., Division of Vital Statistic Abstract Details of trends and variations in teenage childbearing in the 1990's, including some discussion of the health consequences and the Objectives-This report presents national birth rates for teen- demographic and behavioral changes accounting for the recent trends, agers for 1991-98; the percent change, 1991-98; State-specific have been published in a recent report (2). This report updates the teenage birth rates for 1991 and 1997; and the percent change, findings through 1998 for national data and through 1997 for State 1991-97. statistics. Methods-Tabular and graphical descriptions of the trends in teenage birth rates by age group, race, and Hispanic origin of the mother Most teenage births are to unmarried women are discussed. Results-Birth rates for teenagers 15-19 years declined nationally The proportion of births to teenagers that were to unmarried between 1991 and 1998 for all age, race, and Hispanic origin popu- teens continued to increase in 1998, according to preliminary data. lations, with the steepest declines recorded for black women. State- The proportion unmarried rose to 78.8 percent for all teenage births, specific rates by age fell in all States, with most declines statistically up from 78.2 percent In 1997. For teenagers 15-17 years, the percent significant: overall declines ranged from 9 to 32 percent. increased from 86.7 to 87.4 percent, while for older teens, it rose from 72.5 to 73.5 percent (table A). Keywords: teenage fertility . State-specific birth rates . fertility The total number of births to teenagers 16-17 years and the trends number of births to unmarried leenagers 15-17 years declined from teenage pregnancy 1997 to 1998. However, the total number declined even more than the number of nonmarita) births. As a result the percent unmarried for Teenage birth rate down 18 percent since teenagers 15-17 years continued to increase. 1991, close to record low Although the proportion of teenage binhs that are nonmarital continues to rise, it is still the case that most births to unmarried women The birth rate (preliminary) for U.S. teenagers in 1998 was 51.1 are not to teenagers. In 1998, 70 percent were to women aged 20 and live births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years, 2 percent lower than older. the rate in 1997, and 18 percent lower than in 1991 (table 1 and figure 1) (1). The 1998 rate (preliminary) is close to the 1986 record Teenage birth and pregnancy rates fall low of 50.2 (2), The U.S. teen birth rate rose 24 percent from 1986 to 1991, when it reached 62.1, the highest level recorded in 20 years When data on five births are combined with information for (64.5 in 1971). The previous peak period for teen birth rates was the induced abortions and fetal losses, pregnancy rates can be computed. late 1950's; the birth rate was highest in 1957, at 96.3 births per 1,000 (2). The total of 484,975 births (preliminary number) to women aged Acknowledgments 15-19 years in 1998 was slightly higher than the number in 1997 This report was prepared in the Reproductive Statistics Branch (RSB) of the (483,220). but still 7 percent lower than the recent high in 1990 of Division of Vital Statistics (DVS). Melissa Park of RSB provided table review. The report was edited by Patricia Keaton Williams, typesel by Jacqueline M. 521,826. The small 1997-98 increase in the number reflects the Davis, and graphics produced by John Chang of the Publications Branch. 3-percent increase in the number of teenage females in the population Division of Data Services. between 1997 and 1998 (3). U.S. DEPARTMENT or HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC National Center for Health Statistics 10/25/99 09:49 FAX 005 10/25/99 08:07 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P003/011 2 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26, October 25. 1999 Birth rates decline for teenagers in all age 175 groups 150 The birth rate for the youngest teenagers, 10-14 years, fell to 1.0 per 1,000, its lowest level since 1969 (also 1.0) (table 1). Moreover, 125 the number of births to teenagers in this age group fell, to 9,481 in 1998, down 6 percent from 1997 and down 27 percent from its recent high in 1994 (12,901 births). The birth rate for teenagers 15-17 years dealined 5 percent from 10D 1997 to 1998, to 30.4 per 1,000. a record low for this age group. The rate has fallen 21 percent since 1991; this decline assentially reverses 18-19 years the 27-percent Increase in the rate from 1986 (30.5) to 1991 (38.7). The Births per 1,000 women (log scale) number of births in this age group dropped to 173,252, the lowest 75 number since 1987 (2), The birth rate for teenagers 18-19 years declined 2 percent in 1998, to 82.0. This rate has dropped 13 percent since its 1992 high of 94.4. The number of births in this age group Increased 3 percent, 15-19 years reflecting the 5-percent increase in the number of teenage females 50 18-19 years (3). Birth rates fall most steeply for black teenagers 15-17 years Birth rates have dropped sharply for black teenagers since 1991, declining overall by 26 percent, from 15.5 in 1991 to 85.3 per 1,000 aged 15-19 (lable 1, figure 2). lower than in any year since 1960, when data for black women first became available (2). The rate for 25 1960 1970 1980 1990 1998 Hispanic women has declined steadily since 1984 (107.7) and was Year 93.7 in 1998, dropping 13 percent in 4 years. Despite these declines, birth rates for black and Hispanic teenagers continue to be higher Figure 1. Birth rates for teenagers by age: United States, than those for other groups; the rates for Hispanic teens have been 1960-98 higher than the rates for black teens since 1994. Asian Dr Pacific Islander teenagers have the lowest rate (23.1 in 1998). Birth rates have declined as well for non-Hispanic white (35.2 per Because information on the latter two outcomes is not as current as 1,000 in 1998), American Indian (71.8). and Asian or Pacific Islander information on live births, the most recent year for which teenage teenagers (23.1), with declines ranging from 16 to 19 percent since pregnancy rates can be computed is 1996. The estimated teen 1991 (table 1). pregnancy rate in 1996 was 98.7 per 1,000 women aged 15-19, down 15 percent from its high point of 116.5 in 1991 (4). A consistent series of pregnancy rates for teenagers have been available since 1976; the Teenage birth rates vary greatly by State 1996 rate is lower than the rate of any year since 1976. Birth rates vary substantially by State. In 1997 the most recent year for which State-specific rates can be computed. the rates per Table A. Number of total births and percent of births to 1,000 women aged 15-19 years ranged from 26.9 (Vermont) to 73.7 unmarried women, all ages and women under 20 years: (Mississippi) (table 2). The highest rate reported was for Guam United States, final 1997 and preliminary 1998 (106.3). Births to As previously reported, differences in overall rates by State reflect unmarried Percent in part the differences in the composition of the teanage populations of Total births women unmarried the States by race and Hispanic origin (2,5,6). Rates are much higher Age of mother 1998 1997 1998 1997 1998 1997 for Hispanic and black teenagers than for non-Hispanic white teenagers (table 1). This pattern is found for all States (except Louisiana) for which All ages 3,944,046 3,880,894 1,292,534 1,257,444 32.8 32.4 Under 20 years 494,456 493.341 389,721 385,802 reliable rates could be computed for each population (table 3). There- 78.8 78.2 Under 15 years 9.491 10,121 2,162 9,505 00.2 95.7 fore. States with relatively high proportions of Hispanic and/or black 15-19 years 484,975 483,220 380,569 376,117 78.5 77.8 teenagers would be expected to have higher overal teenage birth rates. 15-17 years 173,252 180,154 151,445 156,253 87.4 86.7 18-19 years 371,724 303,066 228,124 219.864 73.5 72.5 These compositional differences should be considered when comparing teenage birth rates across States (6). 10/25/99 09:49 FAX 006 10/25/99 08:08 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P004/011 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47. No. 26, October 25. 1999 3 References 160 1. Martin JA, Smith BL, Mathews T. Ventura S. Births and dealhs: 140 Preliminary data for 1998. National vital statistics reports; vol 47 no 25. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1999. 2. Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Curtin SC. Declines in teenage birth rates, 120 1991-97: National and State patterns. National vital statistics reports; Hispanic vol 47 no 12. Hyatisville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. 100 3. U.S. Bureau of the Census. U.S. population estimates. by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1990 to 1998. Washington, DC: D.S. Bureau of the Census. Internet release, June 4. 1999 Http://www.census.gov/ Black BO population/www/esitlmates/uspop.html. 4. Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, et al. Trends in pregnancies and American Indian pregnancy rates by outcome: Estimates for the United States, 1976-96. Vital Health Stat 21(56). Hyattsville, Maryland National Center for 60 Health Statistics. In preparation. 5. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Estimates of the population of states by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1990 10 1997. STREST97.bil. Product Announcement CB98-122. Released July 21, 1998. Births per 1,000 women 15-19 (log scale) 6. Ventura SJ, Clarke SC, Mathews TJ. Recent declines in teenage birth White, total rates in the United States: Variations by State, 1990-94. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 45 no 5. supp. Hyattsville, Maryland: National 40 Center for Health Statistics. 1996. Non-Hispanic List of detailed tables White Asian or Pacific Islander 1. Number of births to women under 20 years by age, race, and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1998, and birth rales, 1991-98: and percent change in rates) 1991-98 5 2. Birth rates for Leenagers aged 15-19 years by age group and State, and percent change by age: United States and each State, 1991 to 1997 6 20 1985 1995 3. Birth rates for leenagers 15-19 years by age and race/Hispanic 1980 1990 1998 origin: United States and each State, 1997 7 Year Figure 2. Birth rate for teens aged 15-19 years by race and Hispanic origin: United States, 1980-98 Between 1991 and 1997, birth rates for teenagers 15-19 years fell in all States and the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands, with statistically significant reductions in all areas except Rhode Island and Guam (table 2 and figure 3). Declines exceeded 20.0 percent in 10 States and the District of Columbia. Birth rates for teenage subgroups also vary greatly by State. Rates for teenagers 15-17 years fell significantly in all but six States, the Virgin Islands, and Guam, with declines exceeding 20.0 percent in 14 States and the District of Columbia. The rates for the District of Columbia, Maine, and Vermont declined at least 35 percent. State-specific rates for older teenagers 18-19 years also declined, with statistically sig- nificant reductions reported for all but six States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam. The declines for older teenagers were generally smaller than those for younger leens; rates fell signifi- cantly by 20.0 percent or more in live States and the Virgin Islands. 10/25/99 09:49 FAX 007 10/25/99 08:08 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P005/011 4 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26. October 25, 1999 DC 20.0 percent or more 16.0-19.9 percent 13.0-15.9 percent Less than 13.0 percent No significant change Figure 3. Percent decline in teenage birth rates by State, 1991 to 1997 10/25/99 09 49 FAX 008 10/25/99 08:08 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P006/011 National Vital Statistics Reports, Val. 47. No. 26, October 25. 1999 5 Table 1. Number of births to women under 20 years by age, race, and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1998 birth rates, 1991-98; and percent change in rates, 1991-98 [Rates per 1,000 wamen in specified group] Birth rates Percent change Age, race, and Hispanic Number of in rates, origin of mother births, 1998' 1998' 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1991-98 10-14 years Total 9,481 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 -28.6 White. total 4,821 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 -12.5 Non-Hispanic white 2,145 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -20.0 Black 4,291 2.9 33 3.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 -39.6 American Indian² 195 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.4 1.6 1.6 0.0 Asian or Pacific Islander 174 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 -$0.0 Hispanic3 2,721 21 2.3 2.6 2.7 27 2.7 2.6 2.4 -12.5 15-19 years Total 484,975 51.1 52.3 54.4 56.8 589 59.6 60.7 62.1 -17.7 White, total 340,894 45.4 46.3 48.1 50.1 57.1 51.1 51.8 52.8 -14.0 Non-Hispanic while 212,292 35.2 36.0 37.6 39,3 40.4 40.7 41.7 43.4 -18.9 Black 126,865 85.3 88.2 91.4 96.1 104.5 108.6 112.4 115.5 -26.1 American Indian² 8,174 71.8 71.8 73.9 78.0 80.8 83.1 84.4 85.0 -15.5 Asian or Pacific Islander 9,043 23.1 23.7 24.6 26.1 27.1 27.0 26.6 27A -15.7 Hispanic 121,455 93.7 97.3 101.8 106.7 107.7 106.8 107.1 106.7 -12.2 15-17 years Total 173,252 30.4 32.1 33.8 36.0 37.6 37.8 37.8 38.7 -21.4 White. total 116,699 25.9 27.1 2B.4 30.0 30.7 30.3 30.1 30.7 -15.6 Non-Hispanic white 68,657 18.4 19.4 20.6 220 22.8 227 22.7 23.6 -22.0 Black 50,062 56.8 60.8 64.7 69.7 76.3 79.8 B1.3 84,1 -32.5 American Indian2 3,155 44.3 45.3 16.4 47.8 513 53.7 53,8 52.7 -75.9 Asian or Packic Islander 3,336 13.7 14.3 14.9 15.4 16.1 15.0 15.2 16.1 -14.9 Hispanic 48,265 62.3 66.3 69.0 72.9 74.0 71.7 71.4 70.6 -11.6 18-19 years Total 311,724 82.0 83.6 86.0 89.1 91.5 92.1 94.5 94.4 -13.1 White, total 224,195 74.7 75.9 78.4 81.2 82.1 82.1 83.8 83.5 -10.5 Non-Hispanic white 150,535 60.5 61.9 63.7 66.1 67.4 67.7 69.8 70,5 -14.0 Black 76,803 126.8 130.1 132.5 137.1 148.3 151.9 157.9 158.6 American Indian² -20.1 5.019 118.0 117.6 122.3 100.7 130.3 130.7 132.6 134.3 -12.1 Asian or Pacific Islander 5,707 38.2 39.3 40.4 43.4 44.1 43.3 43.1 Hispantc³ 43,1 -11.4 73,789 140.2 144.3 151.1 157.9 158.0 159.1 159.7 158.5 -11.5 'Data for 1998 Bro preliminary. "Includes births to Aleuts and Eskimas. Sincludes all persons of Hispanic origin of any raco. 009 10/25/99 09:49 FAX 10/25/99 08:09 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P007/011 6 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26, October 25, 1999 Table 2. Birth rates for leenagers aged 15-19 years by age group and State, and percent change by age: United State and each State, 1991 to 1997 [Rstes per 1,000 women in specified group) 1991 1997 Percent change, 1991-97 15-19 15-17 18-19 15-19 15-17 18-19 15-19 18-17 18-19 State years years years years years years years years years United States' 62.1 38.7 94.4 523 32.1 89.1 -158 -17.2 -5.6 Alabama 73.9 47.7 109.5 56.6 43.4 100.2 -9.9 -9.1 -8.5 Alaska 65.4 35.3 111.7 44.6 25.1 73.6 -318 -29.0 -14.1 Arizona 80.7 51.4 122.6 69.7 44.0 111.2 -13,6 -14.4 -9.3 Arkansas 79.8 49.4 1228 72.9 42.9 119.2 -8,6 -13.1 -2.9°° California 74.7 46.9 113.6 57.3 36.2 90.5 -23.3 -22.9 -20.3 Colorado 58.2 35.3 91.4 48.2 29.9 77.2 -17.2 -15.5 -15.5 Connecticut 40.4 26.3 59.4 36.1 22.5 58.1 -10/6 -14.5. -2.2" Delaware 61.7 40.3 87.1 55.8 36,8 83.3 -8.7 -8.6" -4.3" District of Columbia 114.4 102.8 125.5 91.0 65.9 122.4 -20,5 -35.9 -2.5" Florida 68.8 44.0 1028 57.7 35.1 94.2 -16/1 -20.2 -B.4 Goorgia 76.3 50.6 110.9 67.2 44.0 102.8 -11,9 -13.0 -7,3 Hawali. 58.7 34.7 91.5 43.8 25.3 69,6 -25.4 -27.1 -23.9 Idaho 53.9 29.3 90.8 43.3 23.3 72.5 -19.7 -20.6 -20.2 Illinois 64.8 40.6 99.7 54.7 34.4 87.6 -15.6 -15.2 -11.7 Indiana 60.5 36.2 95.2 54.2 32.1 87.6 -10.4 -8.7 -7.9 lowa 42.6 22.8 71.5 35.7 20.1 60.4 -16.2 -12.1 -15.5 Kansas 55.4 29.4 94.1 48.5 27.5 81.7 -125 -6,4" -13.2 Kentucky 68.9 42.6 105.5 59.6 35.4 95.0 -13.5 -17.0 -9.9 Louisiana 76.1 51.1 111.4 66.3 42.1 101.4 -12.9 -17.6 -9.0 Maine 43.5 23.8 70.1 320 15.4 58.3 -26.4 -35.0 -16.8 Maryland 54.3 35.2 78.8 43.9 28.2 68.8 -192 -19,9 -13,7 Massachusetts 37.B 25.2 52.9 31.7 19,1 50.8 -16,1 -24.3 -4.0" Michigan 59.0 35.5 91.7 43.9 25.4 72.2 -25.6 -28.4 -20.8 Minnesota 37.3 20.7 61.4 32.0 17.8 55.1 -14.2 -14.1 -10.2 Mississippi 85.6 60.1 120.4 73.7 50.2 108.8 -139 -16.4 -9.6 Missoun 64.5 38.7 100.7 51.5 29.6 86.3 -20.2 -23.7 -14.2 Montana 46.7 23.6 83.0 37.6 20.1 65.2 -19.5 -14.8 -21.4 Nebraska 42.4 23.6 69.2 37.2 21.3 61.6 -123 -9.8" -10.9 Nevada 75.3 43.9 179.1 67.7 42.2 109.1 -10.1 -3.8" -8.4 New Hampshire 33.3 17.1 53.8 286 14.0 53.0 -14.1 -18.2 -1.4° New Jersey 41.6 26.3 629 35.0 21.3 56.7 -15.9 -19.0 -9.9 New Mexico 79.B 50.0 124.4 68.4 44.4 106.3 -143 -11.2 -14.5 New York 46.0 29.1 69.0 38.8 23.4 62.3 -15.7 -10.4 -9.8 North Carolina 70.5 46.2 107.7 61.3 37.7 97.3 -13.0 -18.5 -4.3 North Dakota 35.6 18.1 62.4 30.1 14.3 55.0 -15.4 -20.9 -11.8 Ohio 60.5 36.2 93.8 49.8 28.6 826 -17.7 -21.1 -12.0 Oklahoma 72.1 41.7 115.6 64.3 37.3 107.4 -10.8 -10.7 -7.1 Oregon 54.9 31.3 90.7 46.9 27.0 78.2 -14,6 -13.7 -13.8 Pennsylvania 46.9 29.2 70.5 37.3 21,8 61.3 -20.5 -26.0 -13.0 Rhode Island. 45.4 30.1 63.6 42.7 27.6 65.6 -5.9° -B.2" 3.2" South Carolina 72.9 48.0 105.4 61.4 40.0 93.0 -15.B -16.6 -11.8 South Dakota 47.5 26.3 79.2 39.7 21.8 66.3 -16.4 -17.2 -16.3 Tennessee 75.2 47.8 1121 64.5 38.5 1038 -14.2 -19.4 -7.4 Texas 78.9 50.4 119.3 71.7 47.1 110.1 -9.1 -6.6 -7.7 Utah 48.2 27.0 79.8 42.6 23.7 68,3 -11.6 -12.3 -74.5 Vermont 39.2 21.3 62.0 26.9 12.1 $1.2 -31.0 -83 -17.6 Virginia 53.5 31.8 81.2 44.2 26.1 70.B -17.0 -17.8 -12.8 Washington 53.7 31.0 86.5 42.5 24.5 70.7 -20.8 -20.8 -18.2 West Virginia 57.8 32.4 93.2 49.1 27.5 80.3 -15.3 -16.1 -13.9 Wiscansin. 43.7 24.8 71.2 35.9 21.4 58.8 -17.8 -13.7 -17.4 Wyoming 64.2 26.4 98.6 43.3 23.3 75.8 -20.1 -12.1" -23.1 Pueno Rico 72.4 50.8 105.9 77.8 57.6 106.6 7.5 13.4 0.7" Virgin Islands 77.9 48.6 124.0 66.0 45.6 96.7 -15.3 -8.2" -22.0 Guam 95.7 55.0 156.1 106.3 61.4 178.2 11.) 11.6" 14.2** American Samoa 43.9 20.7 81.5 Not significant al pc0.05. Date not available. Excludes data for Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samas. NOTE: Birth rates by State In this table are based on population estimates provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Censug (5) and, Cherefore. the rales shown here may differ from rates computed on the basis of other population estimates. Table 3. Bill rates for leenagers 15-19 years by age race/Hispanic origin: United States each State, 1997 [Rates pr 1,000 women in specified group] 15-19 years White 66/C7/01 10/25/99 15-17 years 18-19 years White White State All Total Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic' All Total Non-Hispanic Black Hispank AI Total Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic' 50 United Sales 52.3 46.3 36.0 88.2 97.3 32.1 27.1 19.4 60.8 66.3 89.7 75.9 61.9 130.1 144.3 Alabama 66.6 54.5 53.9 90.1 87.5 43.4 31.6 31.3 66.7 . 100.2 88.5 87.5 122.3 60:80 FAX Alaska 44.6 33.6 32.3 73.6 25.1 17.2 16,3 73.6 57.6 56.0 . Arizona 69.7 70.0 41.2 74.9 126.3 440 43.9 226 49,5 86.7 111.2 111.6 71.1 116.6 188.0 Arkansas 72.9 63.9 51.9 104.2 123.2 42.9 34.1 326 73.7 82.2 119.2 110.5 108.0 248.8 Calformia 57.3 61.5 28.6 71.6 95.2 36.2 39.2 14.9 44.4 64.9 90.5 96.0 50.2 113.3 140.7 Colorado 48.2 47.2 31.1 69.8 112.9 29.9 29.4 16,2 41.1 83.5 77.2 75.2 54.7 113.1 159.4 Connectiut. 36.1 306 17.6 78.2 115.5 22.5 18.4 9.2 53.3 79.9 58.1 50.2 31.3 118.2 171.0 Delaware 55.8 40.3 37.2 107.8 36.8 25.4 23.6 73.8 - 83.3 61.1 56.2 160.7 District o'Columbia 91.0 22.0 7.1 139.4 88.6 65.9 27.0 79.0 122.4 19.7 7.3 285.7 Florida 57.7 48.0 42.9 92.2 65.3 35.1 27.2 23,2 53.2 42.0 94.2 87.9 75.9 137.4 99.0 Georgia 67.2 34.0 50.0 926 125.9 44.0 31.4 29.1 68.0 74.9 102.8 89.3 82.7 129.6 200.6 Hawaii. 43.8 220 19.5 37.2 95.4 25.3 8.4 6.7 60.0 69.6 39.4 35.9 142.1 Idaho 43.3 43.3 37.6 101.8 23.3 23.3 19.5 60.4 72.5 72.3 64.1 156.1 Illinois 54.7 420 29.9 115.1 105.3 34.4 23.9 16.0 82.6 65.5 87.6 71.2 52.2 168.0 168.3 Indiana 54.2 49.5 47.8 99.1 97.1 32.1 28.1 26.8 68.5 65.2 87.6 81.8 79.4 148.2 143.6 lowa 35.7 33.6 32.1 104.7 93.4 20.1 18.2 17.2 76.8 62.6 60.4 57.7 55.5 145.9 140.2 Kansas 48.5 44.5 39.7 105.3 106.3 27.5 24.3 20.6 71.3 72.7 81.7 76.6 70.7 158.7 159.3 Kentucky 59.6 56.6 56.2 90.9 102.0 35.4 32.6 32.4 65.7 : 95.0 92.1 91.3 125.2 Louisiana 66.3 48.1 48.5 94.0 34.7 42.1 26.8 26.8 66.0 25.4 T01.4 80.0 81.2 132.5 46.6 Maine 32.0 31.9 31.7 15.4 15.4 15.3 58.3 58.0 57.8 Maryland 43.9 30.0 28.4 75.0 49.1 28,2 167 15.6 53.3 32.1 68.8 51.0 48.9 109.1 72.8 CONTROL Massachusetts 31.7 28.0 19.9 75.4 115.0 19.1 16.2 10.1 47.5 77.9 50.8 46.0 34.B 123.9 176.9 Michigan 43.9 35.4 33.2 8B.3 84.2 25.4 18.9 17.2 59.1 57.4 72.2 60.7 578 132.8 123.9 + Minneseu 32.0 26.1 23.6 119.4 137.4 17.8 13.2 11.5 84.6 88.3 55.1 46.9 430 178.7 210.6 Mississipp 73.7 51.9 57.7 98.9 . 50.2 30.3 30.3 73.4 - 108.8 84.5 84.4 136.4 Missouri. 51.5 44.3 43.5 97.6 79.3 29.6 23.6 229 67.8 64.3 86.3 77.3 76.3 146.6 131.7 Montana 37.6 31.0 30.0 20.1 14.7 140 . 65.2 56.5 54.B 4 Nebraska 37.2 33.3 29.4 101.2 99.5 21.3 18.2 15.6 71.7 62.3 61.6 56.2 50.3 151.5 156.3 Nevada 67.7 65.5 48.0 98.0 121.0 42.2 39.7 27.0 70.5 82.3 109.1 107.4 83.2 141.2 177.6 92024567431 New Hanyshire 28.6 28.7 28.3 14.0 13.0 13.4 53.0 53.5 53.2 New Jersey 35.0 26.0 14.1 79.6 78.7 21.3 14.5 6.7 55.4 52.0 56.7 44.3 26.2 116.7 117.4 New Mexico 68.4 69.0 40.5 50.0 91.3 44.4 45.2 22.6 39.2 63.4 106.3 106.3 69.5 134.4 New York 38.B 33.2 21.9 64.1 74.3 23.4 19.3 11.6 41.1 47.1 62.3 54.0 37.3 T00.9 116.4 North Cantina 61.3 51.0 45.4 85.6 204.2 37.7 29.1 25.8 58.3 122.4 97.3 84.5 75.4 125.9 321.9 North Dabta 30.1 24.7 23.9 . 14.3 10.8 10.3 55.0 46.5 45.2 Ohio 49.8 42.1 41.1 100.4 83.8 28.6 22.5 21.8 68.0 53.6 82.6 72.3 71.0 151.0 128.7 Oldahoma 64.3 37.9 54.B 94.7 1029 37.3 31.9 29.5 67.3 69.9 107.4 99.1 95.1 134.8 154.0 Oregon 46.9 46.1 38.8 72.4 126.2 27.0 26.1 21.0 50.6 85.6 78.2 77.9 67.4 105.5 186.9 Pennsylvania 37.3 29.4 25.8 100.7 117.5 21.9 15.8 13.1 69.2 84.4 61.3 50.5 45.7 151.7 168.3 Rhode Island 42.7 3B.2 27.6 83.9 145.4 27.6 24.3 15.7 50.6 106.2 65.6 59.1 45.1 South Carling 61.4 48.3 47.4 62.7 66.6 40.0 29.1 20.4 57.2 64.8 93.0 76.2 T5.1 121.2 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26, October 25, 1999 South Dabla 39.7 30.1 29.6 21.8 15.2 14.8 66.3 51.4 50.5 Tennessee 64.5 55.0 53.9 99.5 121.5 38.5 29.9 29.1 70.2 77.5 103.8 93.2 91.5 143.5 Texas 71.7 71.4 43.5 85.3 107.7 47.1 46.7 23.9 57.5 77,0 110.1 109.8 74.2 128.1 155.2 Utah 42.6 41.9 36.5 118.5 23.7 23.2 19.2 60.8 68.3 67.4 60.1 168.4 010 See footnoles al end of table. 7 P008/011 Table 3. Birth rates for leenagers 15-19 years by age and race/Hispanic origin: United States and each State, 1997-Con. 8 Rates pr 1,000 women in specified group] 15-19 years 15-17 years 18-19 years 10/25/99 10/25/99 White White White State AS Total Non-Hispanic Black Hispank' Afl Total Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic' All Total Non-Hisparic Black Hispanic Vermont 26.9 27.4 27.6 12.1 12.3 12.4 51.2 52.0 52.7 Virginia 44.2 35.0 32.9 76.0 68.6 26.1 18.4 16.9 51.9 43.7 70.8 59.4 56.3 110.9 101.7 69.6 60.0 104.2 160.8 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26, October 25. 1999 08:10 FAX 08:50 Washington 42.5 41.4 34.8 67.4 106.3 24.5 23.3 18.6 43.1 69.2 70.7 West Virginia 49.1 48.5 48.6 723 27.5 26.8 26.8 50.1 80.3 79.9 803 100.2 Wisconsia 35.9 21.2 24.5 127.9 103.6 21.4 14.6 12.8 88.9 65.3 59.B 46.9 42.9 197.6 166.7 Wyoming. 43.3 42.4 40.2 725 23.3 22.2 20.3 75.8 75.0 72.4 Figure des not meet standards of reliability D precision (based on fewer than 20 births Df fewer than 1,000 women in specified group). Persons 4 Hispanic origin may be of any race. NOTE: Raes by race and Hispanic origin cannot be computed for Puerto Rice, the Vegin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, because populations are not available by race and Hispanic origin for these areas. Birth rates shown in this lattle are based on population estimates provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census (5) and, therefore, may differ from rates computed on the basis of other population estimates. NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P009/011 011 012 10/25/99 09:50 FAX 10/25/99 08:10 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P010/011 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26, October 25, 1999 9 Technical notes Data shown in this report for 1997 and earlier years are based on 100 percent of the birth certificates registered in all States and the District of Columbia. More than 99 percent of births occurring in this country are registered. Data shown for 1998 are preliminary. based on a sample file of more than 99 percent of births for that year (1): Tabulations by State also include Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. However, totals shown for the United States do not include these areas. Tabulations by race and Hispanic origin of mother are based on this information as reported on the birth certificate. Race and Hispanic origin are reported as separate items on the birth certificate. Although the overwhelming majority of Hispanic births (97 percent) are to white women, substantial differences in teenage childbearing patterns exist between Hispanic and non- Hispanic white women. Therefore data are shown separately for these groups, Population data for computing birth rates were provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census (3,5). Rates by State shown here may differ from rates computed on the basis of other population estimates. State rates are based on mother's place of residence. Population estimates by race and Hispanic origin are not available for Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. Rates are not available for American Samoa for 1991, because birth data were not collected. Rates were not computed if there were fewer than 20 births in the numerator or fewer than 1,000 women in the specified group in the denominator. An asterisk is shown in place of the rate. Additional information on the tabulation of birth data by race, random variation, and relative standard error is provided in earlier reports (1,6). 10/25/99 09:50 FAX 013 10/25/99 08:10 NCHS CTR FOR DISEASE CONTROL 92024567431 NO.046 P011/011 12 National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 47, No. 26, October 25, 1999 Suggested citation Contents Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Curtin SC. Declines in teenage birth rates, Abstract 1 1991-98: Update of national and State trends, National vital statistics Teenage birth rate down 18 percent since 1991 1 reports: vol 47 no. 26. Hyattsville. Mary|and: National Center for Health Most teenage births are to unmarried women 1 Statistics 1999. Teenage birth and pregnancy rates fall 1 Birth rates decline for teenagers in all age groups 2 Birth rates fall most steeply for black teenagers 2 National Center for Health Statistics Teenage birth rates vary greatly by State 2 Director, Edward J. Sondik, Ph.D. References 3 Deputy Director, Jack R. Anderson List of detailed tables 3 Technical notes 9 Division of Vital Statistics Director, Mary Anne Freedman To receive this publication regularly, contact the National Center for Health Statistics by calling 307-436-8500 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.cdc.gov/nchswww/ Copyright information All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission: citation as to 10 source, however. is appreciated. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES FIRST CLASS MAIL Centers for Disease Control and Prevention POSTAGE & FEES PAID COC/NCHS National Center for Health Statistics PERMIT NO. G-284 6525 Belcrest Road Hyattsville, Maryland 20782-2003 OHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2000-1120 9-0750 (10/99) OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 10/25/99 09:51 FAX DOMESTIC POLICY COUNCIL 001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** ST. TIME CONNECTION TEL/ID SENDER NAME NO. MODE PGS. RESULT 10/08 16:58 62215 1160 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'36 10/10 08:49 6078 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 01'42 10/11 12:56 92379836 1161 TRANSMIT ECM 4 OK 02'20 10/11 14:27 DOMESTIC POLICY 1162 TRANSMIT ECM 24 OK 07'33 65581 10/11 14:50 6079 AUTO RX ECM 4 OK 02'25 10/12 16:39 6080 AUTO RX ECM 10 OK 02'44 10/13 15:51 67431 1163 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'18 10/13 16:56 202 395 6148 6081 AUTO RX ECM 21 OK 03'24 10/14 16:20 6082 AUTO RX ECM 4 OK 01'56 10/14 16:30 93620493 1164 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 01'03 10/14 17:28 6083 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'19 10/14 17:29 202 395 7709 6084 AUTO RX ECM 25 OK 05'36 10/14 18:00 93620493 1165 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'28 10/14 18:26 93620493 1167 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'34 10/15 11:05 2022930633 6085 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'29 10/15 14:48 6086 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'32 10/16 10:46 6087 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'26 10/17 18:13 6088 AUTO RX ECM 3 OK 01'47 10/19 16:51 97769580 1168 TRANSMIT G3 2 OK 01'17 10/19 18:27 708 2689 6089 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 00'35 10/20 10:31 NAT'L SECURITY 1169 TRANSMIT ECM 11 OK 04'22 98871963 10/20 13:03 92260428 1170 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 01'15 10/20 13:22 912147682507 1171 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'23 10/20 16:03 65557 1172 TRANSMIT ECM 3 OK 00'39 10/21 09:18 916172522100 1173 TRANSMIT ECM 4 OK 01'28 10/21 09:24 54562 1174 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'42 10/21 10:19 61655 1175 TRANSMIT ECM 1 OK 00'26 10/21 10:30 92379836 1176 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'43 10/21 10:53 92379836 1177 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 01'00 10/21 10:55 6090 AUTO RX ECM 1 OK 00'38 10/21 12:56 6091 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 00'48 10/21 13:05 2022243755 6092 AUTO RX ECM 3 OK 00'57 10/21 13:12 92240291 1178 TRANSMIT ECM 4 OK 00'35 10/21 17:19 93620493 1179 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 01'45 10/22 14:42 96220534 1180 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'23 10/22 15:10 96220534 1181 TRANSMIT ECM 2 OK 00'26 10/22 17:19 DOMESTIC POLICY 6093 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 01'19 202 456 5581 10/22 17:47 6094 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 00'24 10/24 13:19 6095 AUTO RX ECM 2 OK 01'19 10/25 09:48 6096 AUTO RX ECM 13 OK 02'23 file teen pregnancy \ fy; THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN TO PHONE: 202.261.5655 PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY FAX: 202.331.7735 2100 M STREET NW SUITE 300 EMAIL: [email protected] WASHINGTON DC 20037 WEB: WWW.TEENPREGNANCY.ORG December 3, 1999 Ms. Melanne Verveer Chief of Staff Office of the First Lady The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Ms. Verveer: As you may know, I have chaired the Board of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy since it was established in February 1996. I took on this job because I was appalled by the teen pregnancy problem in this country. Every year, nearly one million teenage girls become pregnant - that means approximately 4 in 10 teenage girls get pregnant at least once before they reach age 20. This is wrong - for teens, for our society, and particularly for the children born to teenagers. I also became involved with the Campaign because I strongly believe that there is no more effective way of reducing persistent child poverty than by ensuring that more children are born to parents who are ready and able to care for them. The Campaign's strategy for reducing teen pregnancy has two parts: (1) influencing cultural values and messages by working with the entertainment media, parents, faith communities, teens, and others, and (2) building a more coordinated and effective grassroots movement by working with states and local communities. The Campaign's approach at both levels is distinctive in at least three ways. First, we are non-ideological and have worked hard to reduce the conflict that too often has impeded action on this issue. Second, we rely extensively on high-quality research to inform everything we do. And third, we are working in highly leveraged ways with some of the most powerful individuals and organizations in America to change young people's lives. Leveraging our efforts is particularly important. As a small organization working on a big problem in a big country, the Campaign must be very strategic in its work, getting the most bang for the buck. With this basic idea in mind, the Campaign is working to: Build public awareness about the importance of the problem of teen pregnancy by working with opinion leaders and others to create a consensus that more needs to be done. (Example: in the first nine months of 1999, the Campaign was mentioned in the print press over 500 times, including coverage in top-flight newspapers.) Provide easily accessible sources of information for individuals working in communities and at the national level to prevent teen pregnancy. (Example: the Campaign's website, www.teenpregnancy.org, provides data, ideas, and a teen forum. It received almost one million hits in October alone.) Leverage funds to prevent teen pregnancy, including those provided by states and by the federal government. (Example: legislation was recently introduced by the Co-Chairs of our House Advisory Panel that will provide more funds for both programs and evaluation.) Improve the effectiveness with which those funds are spent by encouraging programmatic innovation and by publishing credible research on the effectiveness of new or existing efforts. (Example: many state teen pregnancy prevention plans have been shaped by our advice and publications, especially our very well-received review of what programs work to prevent teen pregnancy.) Change both adult and youth attitudes and knowledge by working with the entertainment media that reaches tens of millions of households every day. (Example: our partnerships with Black Entertainment Television and the WB Network have reached up to 50 million households with shows that address teen pregnancy, and our work with Teen People is reaching eight million-plus teens every month with articles and advice pertaining to teen pregnancy prevention.) Encourage parents to talk with their children about love, sex, and relationships. (Example: our Ten Tips for Parents brochure has already reached a wide audience, including the 90 million readers of Ann Landers' advice column.) Change the priorities and practices of other organizations through work with churches, youth-serving organizations, health professionals, and school personnel that are heavily involved with young people. (Example: our partnership with NBC put materials on teen pregnancy into 68,000 schools; our Nine Tips for Faith Communities has been distributed to every Catholic diocese in the nation and reprinted in the Salvation Army's newsletter.) Stimulate more, and more effective, efforts in local communities through site visits, technical assistance, and publications dealing with the issues of greatest concern to local groups. (Example: the Campaign's new, three-volume manual, Get Organized: A Guide to Preventing Teen Pregnancy, provides concise tips for communities on how to develop teen pregnancy prevention programs and partnerships. The federal government as well as six leading national non-profit groups are disseminating the manual widely. In addition, Campaign staff have visited 43 states in the last few years to provide direct assistance to those working in the field.) Encourage more youth-led efforts to reduce risky behaviors and change peer norms in the process. (Example: each year we are training a new group of youth leaders recruited from organizations that have a national reach, and our tips for teens from teens have been published in Teen People, Ann Landers, and many other places.) These examples indicate how extensive the Campaign's activities are and how they reach all the way from home computers to Congress, from entertainment television to local communities. The good news is that teen pregnancy and birth rates have declined - led by both less sexual activity among teenagers and better contraceptive use by teens who are sexually active. But we must not become complacent. Teen pregnancy rates in the U.S. remain much too high - two or three times those in other industrialized countries. And the hard truth is that yesterday's news about declining teen pregnancy and birth rates won't mean much to the boys and girls who turn 13 next year. For them, we must redouble our efforts to make sure that they benefit from the successes that their older brothers and sisters have begun to see. I am convinced that we will succeed only by engaging a whole new set of players in this issue - whether entertainment leaders and business executives, faith leaders and sports figures, or parents and teens. I want to thank you for your continuing support of the Campaign and hope that you will consider a gift to help us this year. Your contribution will be used to support our current programs and continue the important progress that has been made thus far. Together, we can help to ensure a brighter future for this generation and the next. Best wishes for a joyous holiday season, Sincerely, Tom h Thomas H. Kean Chairman Enclosures THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY 2100 M STREET NW SUITH 300 WASHINGTON DC 20037 BOARD MEMBERS Chairman Thomas H. Kean, former Governor of New Jersey and President, Drew University President Isabel V. Sawhill, Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution Linda Chavez, President, Center for Equal Opportunity Annette Cumming, Executive Director and Vice President, The Cumming Foundation William Galston, Professor, School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland David R. Gergen, Editor-at-Large, U.S. News & World Report Whoopi Goldberg, actress Katharine Graham, Chairman of the Executive Committee, The Washington Post Company David A. Hamburg, M.D., President Emeritus, Carnegie Corporation of New York Alexine Clement Jackson, National President, YWCA of the USA Sheila Johnson, Executive Vice President of Corporate Affairs, Black Entertainment Television, Inc. Judith E. Jones, Clinical Professor, Columbia University School of Public Health Leslie Kantor, Vice President of Education, Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc. Nancy Kassebaum Baker, former U.S. Senator Douglas Kirby, Senior Research Scientist, ETR Associates John D. Macomber, Principal, JDM Investment Group Sister Mary Rose McGeady, President and Chief Executive Officer, Covenant House Jody Greenstone Miller, former Acting President and Chief Operating Officer, Americast John E. Pepper, Chairman of the Board, The Procter & Gamble Company Stephen W. Sanger, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, General Mills, Inc. Victoria P. Sant, President, The Summit Foundation Isabel C. Stewart, National Executive Director, Girls Inc. Judy Woodruff, Prime Anchor and Senior Correspondent, CNN Andrew Young, former Ambassador to the U.N. and Co-Chairman, GoodWorks International Trustees Emeriti Charlotte Beers, Chairman, J. Walter Thompson Irving B. Harris, Chairman, The Harris Foundation Barbara Huberman, Director of Training, Advocates for Youth The Hon. C. Everett Koop, M.D., former U.S. Surgeon General Judy McGrath, President, MTV Kristin Moore, President, Child Trends, Inc. Hugh Price, President, National Urban League, Inc. Warren B. Rudman, former U.S. Senator and Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison Campaign Director Sarah Brown The Washington Post SATURDAY, JUNE 12. 1999 ANN LANDERS Dear Ann: trouble. Let your kids know that you value This article appeared in the Voices for Illinois education highly. Children magazine. It was helpful to me, and I 9. Know what your kids are watching, reading believe it will help other parents as well. Please, and listening to. You can always turn the TV off, Ann, print It in your column. cancel subscriptions and place certain movies off A Chicago Parent limits. 10. These tips work best when they are part of Parents of teenagers need all the help they can strong, close relationships with your children that get these days. I'm grateful to you for sendifig it are built from an early age. Express love and on. Here it is: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen affection clearly and often, and listen carefully to Pregnancy recently published Ten Tips for Par- what your children say. Spend time with them, ents to Help Their Children Avoid Teen Pregnan- and engage in activities they like. Be supportive cy. Here is an abbreviated version: Ten Tips for and interested in what interests them, and help Parents them build self-esteem. Remember, it's never too 1. Be clear about your own sexual values and late to improve a relationship with a child or attitudes. Communication with your children teenager. about sex will be more successful when YOU are certain about these issues. 2. Talk with your children early and often about sex, and be specificl Initiate the conversa- tion, and make sure it's a dialogue, not a monologue. 3. Supervise and monitor your children by establishing rules, curfews and standards of expected behavior, preferably through an open process of family discussion. 4. Know your children's friends and their families. Welcome them into your home, and talk openly. 5. Discourage early, frequent and steady dating. One-on-one dating before age 16 can lead to trouble. 6. Take a strong stand against your daughter dating a boy who is significantly older, and don't allow your son to develop an intense relationship with a girl who is much younger. The age difference between younger girls and older boys or men can lead girls into risky behavior. 7. Show your teenagers that there are options for the future that are more attractive than early parenthood. Help them set meaningful goals for the future, and discuss what it takes to make those goals come true. 8. School failure is often the first sign of E DITORIAL By DAVID GERGEN EDITOR AT LARGE A sense of belonging B ack in the early 1980s, the Rev. Billy Graham paid Education. While SAT scores are up 16 points since the be- a visit to Harvard and was greeted with a yawn. A few ginning of the decade, overall student performance has not weeks ago, he returned to an entirely different at- yet shown serious improvement. But, as reported here ear- mosphere. Students camped out all night on Saturday so lier, the "standards" movement is now catching on and rep- they could have a seat in Memorial Church when he resents the most promising reform in 30 years. Linked with preached on Sunday. His later appearance at the Kennedy charter and choice, educational gains could come sooner School of Government drew a packed house, which turned than we think. into a religious revival as, one after another, young peo- Youth behavior. Teenage pregnancy has dropped seven ple proclaimed their faith in God. years in a row, and as the National Campaign to Prevent There is something new in the air-and not just at Har- Teen Pregnancy moves ahead, it could conceivably cut vard. Across the land, Americans are hungering for some- rates in half in the next few years. Teen drug use is also thing more than money and a new car. They are looking for down, and the Partnership for a Drug-Free America re- answers that satisfy the soul and restore a sense of be- ported last week that the number of teenagers who think longing to one another. We are a long refusal to use drugs is "really cool" is way from there, but signs of cultural up to 40 percent. renewal are springing up all about us- and just in time. Across the land, Popular culture and religion. Charita- ble giving rose 16 percent from 1997 to In 1994, William J. Bennett issued 1998, the largest jump on record. We the first Index of Leading Cultural In- Americans hunger could be seeing the beginnings of a dicators, one of his many contributions boom in philanthropy as donors create to the common weal. In his report, he for something more accounts at institutions like Fidelity provided a boxcar of graphs and charts and scan the AOL Web site to identi- substantiating his main conclusion. "In many ways, the condition of Amer- than money and a fy worthwhile charities. While mem- bership in mainstream churches drifts ica is not good," he wrote. "Over the past three decades we have experi- brand-new car. downward, we are also seeing huge growth in large, new churches, many enced substantial social regression of them nondenominational. And con- Unless these exploding social patholo- versation about God is returning to the gies are reversed, they will lead to the decline and perhaps dinner table, even as talk of sex seemingly diminishes. even to the fall of the American republic." Some say these trends simply reflect a better business Bennett set forth five areas of social life that concerned climate. But the economy was bounding up in the 1960s him. Witness some of the changes in the years since: and 1980s, too, and yet social indicators went south. More Crime. The national crime rate has declined seven years likely what we are seeing is an America that looked into the in a row, and latest numbers are the lowest since 1985. abyss and decided to change its mind. Violent crime has followed a similar downward slope, drop- No one should pop champagne corks yet. As Bennett ping more than 6 percent in 1998. The Centers for Disease warns in the introduction to his latest Index, "The nation Control and Prevention reports that gun deaths dropped we live in today is more violent and vulgar, coarse and cyn- 21 percent between 1993 and 1997, while firearm-related ical, rude and remorseless, deviant and depressed, than injuries are down 41 percent. the one we once inhabited." We still have much to reverse Family and children. While there was a slight uptick in and rebuild. 1997, the divorce rate for married women is hovering at Nonetheless, these signs of cultural renewal should lift its lowest rate since 1974. Abortion, which steadily in- our sights as we head toward the holidays and a new cen- creased from 1983 through 1990, has been declining in the tury. Progress is possible. We still control our own destiny. 1990s. Statistics show there were at least 208,000 fewer One of our greatest strengths as a society is our resiliency- abortions per year toward the end of the decade than at our capacity to snap back from bad times. Just in time, it the beginning. seems, we're recovering our bearings. 108 U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT, DECEMBER 6, 1999 OCTOBER 17, 1999 THE SUNDAY RECORD RO-5 How to combat the problem of teen pregnancy TOM KEAN that two-thirds of the drop in sexual activity "Contraception works, but only if you use it every "Nine Tips to Help Faith Leaders and Their among teenage males was the result of a change in time," and "If we want to reduce pregnancy among Communities to Address Teen Pregnancy." to every their attitude. our daughters, we need to talk to our sons." diocese in the nation. The Religious Coalition for A 8 many of you know, I have 3) A strong economy with increases in the minimum Our ideas are showing up in programs and maga- Reproductive Choice has distributed thousands of been chairing the National wage and the Earned Income zines. For example, ABC's copies as well - and so has the Salvation Army. Campaign to Prevent Teen Tax Credit. More jobs mean "One Life to Live" recently Pregnancy since 1996. I took on more incentives to avoid Our goal Is to reduce teen pregnan- did a story line about a teen one of this would be effective unless we were the job because I was appalled by early childbearing. cy by one-third by the year 2005. dealing with an unwanted the the extent of the problem in 4) Welfare reform and, in pregnancy, and last week's N also working with teens themselves. Over the last few years the Campaign Youth this country. particular, much tougher issue of People magazine Leadership Team, a group of young people from Nearly 1 million teenage girls enforcement of child-support laws. featured a story on what it's like to be pregnant. around the country, has made a real difference. Former NJ. become pregnant a year. That Despite all this, our teen pregnancy rates remain Basketball star Grant Hill is appearing in commer- These teens help us to design the media messages. governor and means four in 10 teenage girls get much too high - two or three times those of other cials for us in Teen People and Sports Illustrated. president of provide feedback, and come up with creative ways to pregnant at least once before they industrialized countries. Drew University The media is the most visible but no more impor- involve other teens. They are our ambassadors in reach the age of 20. That is unac- In the National Campaign we have adopted a two- tant than groups like Best Friends and Planned their communities and nationwide. We cannot ceptable for teens, for our society, faceted approach: first, to influence cultural values by Parenthood Most of all, parents must talk to their change teen culture without the teens. and particularly for the children working with the media, parents, teens, and faith com- children and not just about the "birds and bees." born to children. munities; and second, to build more effective grass- Woodrow Wilson was asked in 1920 why he was I strongly believe there is no more effective way of roots movements by working with local communities. There must be ongoing conversations about sexu- working so tirelessly on behalf of the League of breaking the cycle of poverty than making sure that al feelings and relationships, about dating and pres- Nations. He replied, "My clients are the children. more children are born to parents who are ready and et's start with the media. Twenty-eight million sures, and about parents' own moral values. The My clients are the next generation." able to care for them. L people a week watch "ER" Thirty million read Campaign's hottest-selling publication, already dis- We have made progress, but there is 80 much work There is finally some good news. The 1990s have People Magazine, and more people watch soap tributed to more than 150,000 people, is called "Ten still to do. Our goal is to reduce teen pregnancy by seen teen pregnancy begin to decline. operas than the news. We are working with writers Tips for Parents." It has appeared in Ann Landers' one-third by the year 2005. I'm convinced we can do it There are a number of possible reasons: and producers to convince children that although syndicated column featured in 12,000 newspapers by bringing a whole new set of players into the arena 1) The fear of AIDS and other sexually transmit- sex may seem glamorous, its consequences are not reaching more than 90 million people. entertainment moguls. business executives. faith ted diseases. Woven into popular shows are simple messages Faith communities are doing their part. The leaders. sports figures, parents, and teens - in other 2) A change in attitude. A recent survey showed such as "Not everyone is doing it, or Catholic Church has already sent our paperback, words. each and every one of us can make a difference. 04/27/99 22:17 FAX 002 fite been pregnancy NEWS THEALAN GUTTMACHER CONTACT: INSTITUTE Susan Tew/Chris Kirchgaessner 212-248-1111 NEW YORK & WASHINGION [email protected] Embargoed For Release to Print/Broadcast Media: 120 Wall Street, NY, NY 10005 THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 1999 U.S. TEENAGE PREGNANCY RATE DROPS ANOTHER 4% BETWEEN 1995 AND 1996 TEENAGE PREGNANCY DECLINES IN ALL STATES Levels of teenage pregnancy continued their downward trend at both the national and the state levels in 1996. Nationwide, the teenage pregnancy rate, including births, abortions and miscarriages, declined 4% between 1995 and 1996, from 101.1 to 97.3 pregnancies per 1,000 women aged 15-19. The teenage binhrate also declined 4%, and the abortion rate declined 3% in this short period, according to new data released by The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Teenage Pregnancy: Overall Trends and State-by-State Information presents data for the last decade, including national trends by race and among Hispanics. Teenage pregnancy rates in 1996 varied widely by state, from 50 pregnancies per 1,000 young women in North Dakota to 140 in Nevada and 256 in the District of Columbia. In all but one state-NewJersey-the teenage pregnancy rate was lower in 1996 than in 1992. Steep decreases in the early 1990s in the pregnancy rate among sexually experienced teenagers accounted for most of the drop in the overall U.S. pregnancy rate. Most of this decline is due to slight increases in the proportion of sexually active teenagers using a contraceptive method; teenagers' using highly effective, long-acting methods; and modest reductions in failure rates among those using condoms and oral contraceptives. "Many groups want to take credit for the drop in teenage pregnancy, but the credit truly goes to the teenagers. About 20% of the decrease since the late 1980s is because of decreased sexual activity, and 80% of the decrease is because of more effective contraceptive practice- the methods teenagers are choosing to use and how well they are using them Many sexually active teenagers are using the highly effective contraceptive implant, Norplant, and injectable, Depo-Provera, which only became available in the early 1990s. Many factors undoubtedly account for these behavioral changes and are much harder to measure. But it is clear that efforts to promote both responsible sexual decision-making and effective contraceptive practice can have big impacts," comments Jacqueline E. Dartoch, the Institute's vice president for research. ### The Alan Guttmacber Institute-www.agi-usa.org- is a nonprofit organization focused on reproductive health research, policy analysis and public education, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C. 04/27/99 Methods used by teens at risk for 22:17 FAX unintended pregnancy have changed Women 15-19 at risk for unintended pregnancy 46% 26% 6% Implant-2.2% 1988 Injectable-8.3% Pill 11% 35% 29% 5% Condom 1995 Other 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 003 The Alan Guttmacher Institute Tabulations from 1988 and 1995 NSFG 04/27/99 22:17 FAX 004 Teenage Pregnancy Overall Trends and State-by-State Information THE ALAN GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE NEW YORK & WASHINGTON 120 Wall Street New York, NY 10005 Phone: 212.248.111 Fax: 212.248.1951 The Alan Guttmacher Institute, April 1999 E-mail: [email protected] web site: www.agi-usa.org 04/27/99 22:17 FAX 005 Summary Pregnancy, birth and abortion rates among U.S. Florida and Texas. Minnesota, New Hampshire, Maine teenagers continued their downward trend in 1996. and Iowa had the lowest rates after North Dakota's. Nationwide, the pregnancy rate declined 4% between Wide variation is also seen in state teenage 1995 and 1996, from 101.1 to 97.3 pregnancies per birthrates for 1996 (Table 4). The highest rates 1,000 women aged 15-19 (Table 1). The rate has (70-75 births per 1,000 women aged 15-19) were dropped 9% since 1986 and, more significantly, 17% found in Mississippi, Arkansas, Arizona, Texas and since peaking in 1990. New Mexico; in the District of Columbia, 102 births The birthrate for teenagers also declined 4% occurred per 1,000 teenage women. The lowest rates between 1995 and 1996, to 54.4 births per 1,000 (29-32 per 1,000) were in New Hampshire, Vermont, women (Table 1). Although the 1996 rate was 8% Maine, Minnesota and Massachusetts. higher than the 1986 rate, it was 12% lower than the Statewide teenage abortion rates were highest peak rate of 62.1 births per 1,000 reached in 1991. (45-53 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-19) in Teenagers' abortion rate declined 3% between New York, Nevada, New Jersey, Maryland and Cali- 1995 and 1996 (Table 1). Since 1986, the rate has fornia (Table 4); the rate in the District of Columbia dropped 31%, to 29.2 abortions per 1,000 women was 121 per 1,000. Teenagers in Utah, North aged 15-19. At the same time, the proportion of Dakota, South Dakota, West Virginia, Idaho and teenage pregnancies ending in abortion has fallen Iowa had the lowest abortion rates (8-12 abortions from 46% to 35%-a decline of 24%. per 1,000). White and black adolescents have experienced Overall, 35% of pregnancies among 15-19-year declines in pregnancy rates, although the magnitude olds ended in abortion in 1996 (Table 4). However, of the changes has varied considerably. Among black in New Jersey, nearly six in 10 (58%) teenage preg- women aged 15-19, the nationwide pregnancy rate nancies ended in abortion; the proportion also fell 20% between 1990 and 1996; among white exceeded 50% in New York, Massachusetts and the teenagers, it declined 16% during that time (Table 1). District of Columbia. By contrast, only 15% of preg- The pregnancy rate among Hispanic teenagers, who nancies among teenagers in Utah ended in abortion; can be of any race, increased between 1990 and the proportion was also below 20% in Oklahoma, 1992, but then fell 6% by 1996 (Table 2). Mississippi, Kentucky, Arkansas, Louisiana and West Roughly 880,000 pregnancies occurred among Virginia. women aged 15-19 in 1996; 62% of these pregnan- Between 1985 and 1996, teenage pregnancy rates cies were to 18-19-year olds (Table 3). California declined in 47 states; in the remaining three (Illinois, reported the highest number of adolescent pregnan- Indiana and Nevada) and the District of Columbia, cies (126,300), followed by Texas, New York, Florida rates declined between 1992 and 1996 (Table 5). In and Illinois (with about 40,000-80,000 cach). The 27 states and the District of Columbia, teenage smallest numbers of teenage pregnancies were in Ver- birthrates wcre higher in 1996 than in 1985; in all but mont, North Dakota, Wyoming, South Dakota and one of these states, however, the rate was lower in Alaska, all of which reported fewer than 2,000 preg- 1996 than in 1992. Teenage abortion rates declined nancies among women aged 15-19. in every state bctween 1985 and 1996. In the District Teenage pregnancy rates in 1996 varied widely by of Columbia, the rate was higher in 1996 than in state, ranging from 50 pregnancies per 1,000 women 1985, but it declined between 1992 and 1996. aged 15-19 in North Dakota to 140 per 1,000 in Nevada and 256 per 1,000 in the District of Columbia This information is provided through the support of The (Table 4). The highest state adolescent pregnancy rates Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and The Educational Foun- after Nevada's were found in California, Arizona, dation of America. 006 04/27/99 22:18 FAX About the Tables Data Sources and Methodology were obtained from nonhospital abortion facilities, Pregnancies are calculated as the sum of births, mis- again on the assumption that the proportion of nonresi- carriages (including stillbirths) and abortions. The dents was the same for teenagers as for all women. number of births to tcenagers in each state and For the years before 1996, no data on the state of teenage birthrates were obtained from the National residence for teenagers were used, and teenagers Center for Health Statistics.¹ The number of miscar- were assumed to have obtained abortions in other riages was estimated as 20% of births plus 10% of states in the same proportions as other women abortion; these proportions attempt to account for All rates were calculated using population denomi- miscarriages that occur after the pregnancy has lasted nators estimated by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.⁴ long enough to be noted by the woman (6-7 weeks The 1990 census found slightly more teenagers than after the last menstrual period).² had been projected. National population estimates for The number of abortions, however, is measured earlier years were adjusted on the basis of these find- less directly. For 1996, the number of abortions ings, but state estimates were not. obtained by teenage residents of each state was calcu- lated by starting with the number of abortions in Interpreting the Data each state that were provided to teenagers (residents Because health department abortion statistics are and nonresidents) and then reallocating abortions to imperfect or nonexistent in many states, care should the woman's state of residence. The number of abor- be used in interpreting the teenage abortion and preg- tions performed in each state for women of all ages nancy data. For the six states with no information on was derived from a survey of all abortion providers the age of women having abortions, the teenage abor- conducted by The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). tion rate was estimated from the overall abortion The number of abortions obtained by women aged rate, which correlates highly (but not perfectly) with 15-17 and 18-19 in each state was estimated by the rate for teenagers. For these states and several applying the proportion of abortions provided to others, no information specific to teenagers was avail- women in these age-groups, as documented by the able indicating the state of residence of women hav- state abortion reporting system, to the AGI total ing abortions in the state; the assumption that number of abortions in the state. For states with no teenagers come from other states for abortions at the information on the age of women having abortions same rate as all women may not be completely accu- (California, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, New Hamp- rate. In particular, minors in states with parental shire and Oklahoma), the proportion of abortions involvement requirements for abortion may travel to obtained by teenagers was estimated on the basis of other states at higher rates than all women, and some information from neighboring or similar states. of these minors may not havc been reassigned to The reassignment of abortions to the woman's state their state of residence. Time trends may also be of residence was also based on information provided by affected, since before 1996, no data specific to state abortion reporting agencies. For states that did not teenagers were used to assign abortions to the supply information on the state of residence of teenager's state of residence. teenagers having abortions, the proportion of abortion Births and abortions have been recorded according patients who came from other states and the states to the woman's age at the time of the event, not the agc from which they came were assumed to be the same for when she became pregnant; pregnancy rates are there- teenagers as for women of all ages. For states with no fore understated. For example, the rate for women aged information about the state of residence of women hav- 18-19 would be higher than that shown if pregnancies ing abortions, data or estimates of state of residence beginning at age 19 and ending at age 20 were included. References 1. Vencura SJ. Mathews TJ and Curtin SC, Teenage births in the United States: state trends, 1991-96, an update, Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 1998, Vol. 16, No. 11, Suppl. 2. 2. Leridon H, Human Fertility: The Baric Components, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977, Table 4.20. 3. Henshaw SK, Abortion incidence and services in the United Scates, 1995-1996, Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(6) 263-270 & 287. 4. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Estimates of the population of scaces by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1990 5 1996, Dcc. 1997, <http://www.cenus.gov/populacion/estimates/stare/sasrh/sasrh86.bt>. 04/27/99 22:18 FAX 007 Table 1. Pregnancy, birth and abortion rates per 1,000 women aged 15-19, and abortion ratio (sbortions per 100 pregnancies), by race, 1986-1996 Race and measure 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Total Pregnancy rate' All women 15-19 106.7 106.6 111.4 114.9 117.1 115.8 111.9 109.3 106.1 101.1 97.3 Sexually active women 15-19 210.7 206.7 212.2 218.5 224.3 222.4 215.5 211.1 205.4 196.3 189.5 Birthrate 50.2 50.6 53.0 57.3 60.4 62.1 60.7 59.6 58.9 56.8 54.4 Abortion rate 42.3 41.8 43.5 42.0 40.6 37.6 35.5 34.3 32.2 30.0 29.2 Abortion ration 45.7 45.2 45.1 42.3 40.2 37.7 36.9 36.5 35.3 34.6 34.9 White Pregnancy rate* 90.0 89.6 93.0 95.8 98.3 97.0 93.0 90.9 88.9 86.0 82.6 Birthrate 42.3 42.5 44.4 47.9 50.8 52.6 51.8 51,1 51.1 50.1 48.1 Abortion rate 35.6 35.1 36.1 34.8 33.9 30.5 28.1 26.9 25.1 23.5 22.6 Aportion ratiot 45.7 45.2 44.9 42.1 40.1 36.6 35.2 34.5 33.0 32.0 32.0 Nonwhite All Pregnancy rate* 180.7 180.1 189.1 193.4 189.6 189.6 185.2 180.4 172.5 158.7 153.3 Birthrate 84.8 85.5 89.2 95.9 96.5 98.4 95.5 92.5 89.1 82.2 78.1 Abortion rate 71.8 70.4 74.6 71.3 67.1 65.1 64.2 63.1 59.6 54.6 54.2 Abortion ratiot 45.8 45.2 45.5 42.6 41.0 39.8 40.2 40.5 40.1 39.9 41.0 Black Pregnancy rate" U U U U 224.3 223.7 218.7 212.7 202.1 184.8 178.9 Birthrate 95.8 97.6 102.7 111.5 113.1 115.5 112.4 108.6 104.5 96.1 91.4 Abortion rate U u u u 80.5 77.4 76.2 74.9 69.7 63.2 62.9 Abortion rallot U u u u 41.6 40.1 40.4 40.8 40.0 39.7 40.8 "Includes estimated number of pregnancies ending In miscarriages. *Denominator excludes miscarriages. Notes: Data are tabulated according to the woman's age at the pregnancy out- como and, for births, according 10 the mother's race (not the child's). No data are presented separately for nonwhite women other than blacks because of amall numbers and the heserogeneity of the group. u=unavallable. Table 2. Pregnancy, birth and abortion rates per 1,000 Hispanic women aged 15-19, and abortion ratio (abortions per 100 pregnan- cies), 1990, 1992 and 1996 Measure 1990 1992 1996 Pregnancy rate' 163.4 176.0 164.6 Birthrate 100.3 107.1 101.8 Abortion rate 39.1 43.2 38.6 Abortion ration 28.0 28.7 27.5 *Includes estimated number of pregnancies ending in miscar- riages. +Denominator excludes miscarriages. Note: Data are lab- vialed according 10 the woman's age at the pregnancy outcome. Hlapanic teenagers may be of any race. Teenage Pregnancy: Overall Trends and State-by-State Information, AGI, April 1999 04/27/99 22:18 FAX 008 Table 3. Number of pregnancies among women aged 15-19, by state of residence, according to age-group, 1996 State 15-17 18-19 15-19 U.S. total 337,530 542,640 680,170 Alabama 6,400 10,120 16,520 Alaska 640 1,130 1,770 Arizona 7.050 10,600 17,650 Arkansas 3,660 6,430 10,090 California* 49,110 77,190 126,300 Colorado 4,660 7,270 11,930 Connecticut 3,440 4,790 8,230 Delaware* 910 1,310 2,220 Dist. of Columbiat 1,400 2,000 3,400 Florida* 18,300 29,990 48,290 Georgia 11,270 16,950 28.220 Hawaii 1,510 2,440 3,950 Idaho 1,240 2,430 3.670 [linois 17,380 25,130 42,510 Indiana 6,650 12,020 18,670 lowa" 2,200 4,010 6,210 Kansas 2,720 4,760 7,480 Kentucky 4,600 8,070 12,670 Louisiana 6,700 10,650 17,350 Maine 840 1,580 2,420 Maryland 6,550 9,930 16,480 Massachusetts 5,160 9,010 14,170 Michigan 11,350 18,490 29,840 Minnesota 3,480 5,960 9,440 Mississippi 4,940 7,150 12,090 Missouri 6,060 10,350 16,410 Montana 780 1,440 2,230 Nebraska 1,350 2,520 3,870 Nevada 2,690 4,150 6,840 New Hampshire* 720 1,410 2,130 New Jersey 9,420 14,280 23,700 New Mexico 3,010 4,390 7,400 New York 23,960 37,740 61,700 North Carolina 9,770 15,470 25,240 North Dakota 390 840 1,230 Ohio 11,510 20.270 31,780 Oklahoma 3,950 7,090 11,040 Oregon 3,740 6,310 10,050 Pennsylvania 10,090 17,040 27,130 Rhode Island 930 1,690 2,620 South Carolina 5,160 7,830 12,990 South Dakota 640 1,130 1,770 Tennessee 6,800 11,360 18,160 Texas 31,800 48,690 80,490 Utah 2,070 4,140 6,210 Vermont 420 790 1,210 Virginia 6,960 12,080 19,040 Washington 6,220 10,110 16,330 West Virginia 1,730 3,230 4,960 Wisconsin 4,250 7,300 11,550 Wyoming 580 930 1,510 "Abortion estimates are based on the proportion of abortions oblained by women of the same age in neighboring or similar states. tDistribution 01 abortions among teenagers into age- groups 15-17 and 18-19 is based on the proportion among all black leenagers nationally. Notes: Data are tabulated according to the woman's age at the prognancy autcome. Even though abor- tions have been tabulated according to state of residence where possible, in states with parantal notification or consent require- ments for minors, the number of pregnancies shown may be too low because minors may have traveled to other states for abor. lion services. Pregnancies include estimales ol the number of miscarriages. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10. Teenage Pregnancy: Overall Trends and State-by-State Information, AGI, April 1999 04/27/99 22:18 FAX 009 Table 4. Ranking of pregnancy, birth and abortion rates per 1,000 women aged 15-19, these rates by age-group, and abortion ratio (abortions per 100 pregnancies), all according to state, 1996 State Pregnancy rate" Birthrate Abortion rate Abortion ratio# Rankt 15-19 15-17 18-19 Rankt 15-19 15-17 16-19 Rankt 15-19 15-17 18-19 U.S. total na 97 62 153 na 54 34 86 na 29 19 46 35 Alabama 12 106 69 160 7 69 45 104 24 21 13 32 23 Alaska 35 75 46 117 29 46 26 75 33 18 13 25 28 Arizona 3 118 80 176 3 74 49 111 16 27 19 39 27 Arkansas B 108 65 174 2 75 45 122 37 16 10 25 18 California 2 125 80 196 14 63 39 99 5 45 30 70 42 Colorado 21 90 58 141 25 50 30 80 15 28 20 41 36 Connecticut 29 86 58 131 42 37 24 58 8 37 26 55 50 Delaware$ 20 95 65 137 18 57 41 80 20 24 15 37 30 Dist. of Columbia** na 256 185 349 na 102 79 133 na 121 82 173 54 Floridas 4 115 71 185 16 59 37 94 6 40 24 65 40 Georgia 7 109 72 167 8 68 45 103 19 25 16 39 27 Hawaii 15 101 66 149 26 48 28 76 7 39 30 53 45 Idaho 38 70 40 114 27 47 26 78 45 12 7 19 20 Illinois 11 106 70 164 17 57 36 91 10 34 25 50 38 Indiana 25 88 52 143 19 56 33 91 30 19 11 30 25 Iowas 46 56 34 96 41 38 21 64 46 12 7 18 23 Kansas 34 79 47 130 24 50 28 84 35 18 12 26 26 Kentucky 24 89 54 140 15 61 37 98 43 14 9 21 18 Louisiana 19 97 62 148 9 67 43 102 41 15 10 23 19 Maine 47 57 32 96 48 31 17 55 34 18 11 28 36 Maryland 13 106 68 165 30 46 30 72 4 46 30 71 50 Massachusetts 33 79 48 126 46 32 20 51 9 37 22 59 53 Michigan 27 B7 54 140 28 46 28 75 14 29 18 45 38 Minnesota 49 56 33 93 47 32 19 54 38 16 10 25 33 Mississippi 10 108 74 160 1 75 52 110 39 16 10 25 17 Missouri 30 86 52 140 20 54 31 90 29 19 13 30 27 Montana 40 65 38 107 40 39 21 66 36 17 11 26 31 Nebraska 41 62 36 101 39 39 22 64 42 14 6 22 26 Nevada 1 140 90 220 6 70 42 114 2 51 36 76 42 New Hampshire$ 48 57 31 100 50 29 15 51 25 20 12 3S 42 New Jersey 18 97 63 152 44 35 23 55 3 50 32 78 58 New Mexico 6 110 73 168 5 71 46 111 22 22 16 32 24 New York 9 108 70 166 36 42 26 66 1 53 36 78 56 North Carolina 14 105 68 161 11 63 41 97 18 26 17 40 29 North Dakota 50 50 28 88 45 32 16 58 49 10 6 17 24 Ohio 32 81 48 131 22 50 30 83 32 18 11 29 27 Oklahomas 23 90 53 149 12 63 37 105 44 13 7 21 17 Oregon 22 90 55 146 21 51 29 85 17 26 18 40 34 Pennsylvania 38 70 42 112 38 39 24 63 26 20 12 34 34 Rhode Island 28 87 51 142 35 42 27 66 11 32 16 57 43 South Carolina 17 98 65 145 13 63 41 94 27 20 14 29 24 South Dakota 45 59 35 95 37 39 22 66 48 10 7 15 20 Tennessee 16 100 62 158 10 66 40 106 31 18 12 28 22 Texas 5 113 74 174 4 73 49 111 21 23 14 36 24 Utah 44 60 34 95 34 43 24 69 50 8 5 12 15 Vermont 43 60 34 103 49 30 15 54 23 22 14 35 42 Virginia 26 87 54 136 31 46 28 72 12 30 19 46 40 Washington 31 85 54 135 32 45 26 74 13 29 20 42 39 West Virginia 37 73 43 117 23 50 29 82 47 11 8 17 19 Wisconsin 42 61 37 100 43 37 22 61 40 15 10 24 29 Wyoming 36 74 46 120 33 44 25 75 28 20 15 27 31 *Includes estimated number of pregnancies ending in miscarriages. tBased on rates for women aged 15-19. Denominator excludes miscarriages. SAbortion estimates are based on the proportion of abor. llone obtained by women of the same age in neighboring or similar states. "Distribution of abortions among teenagers Into age-groups 15-17 and 18-19 is based on the propertion among all black leenagers nationally, Notes: Data are labulated according to the woman's age al the pregnancy outcome. Even though abortions have been labulated according to state of residence where possible, in states with parental notification or consent requirements for minors, the pregnancy and abortion rates may be too low because minors may have traveled to other states for abortion services. na=not applicable. Teenage Pregnancy: Overall Trends and State-by-State Information, AGI, April 1999 010 04/27/99 22:18 FAX Table 5. Pregnancy, birth and abortion rates per 1,000 women aged 15-19, by state of residence, selected years State Pregnancy rate" Birthrate Abortion rate 1985 1988 1992 1996 1985 1988 1992 1996 1985 1988 1992 1996 U.S. total 110 111 112 97 51 53 61 54 44 43 35 29 Alabama 112t 1101 117 106 64 3 73 69 32+ 32+ 27 Alaska 21 144+ 111t 1091 75 66 57 64 46 59+ 38+ Arizona 30t 18 128 127 133 118 67 69 82 74 43 40 32 Arkansas 27 111 115 116 108 72 70 75 75 23 27 23 California 16 1511 154t 1591 125t 54 58 74 63 791 76+ 64+ 45t Colorado 112 102 111 90 46 49 58 so 51 39 37 28 Connecticut 96 107 96 86 33 36 39 37 52 58 44 37 Delaware 101+ 1171 1211 95+ 50 53 60 57 37+ 49+ 44t Dist. of Columbia 24+ 211 209 277 256 72 74 116 102 113 110 125 121 Florida 126+ 133T 127+ 115t 58 63 66 59 51t 52+ 43t 40t Georgia 132 122 127 109 70 69 75 68 44 37 34 25 Hawaii 125 134 138 101 48 49 54 48 61 68 67 39 Idaho 78 73 77 70 46 45 52 47 21 17 14 12 Illinois 103+ 112t 112t 106 50 54 64 57 3BT 43t 33t 34 Indiana 87 89 95 88 51 52 59 56 24 25 22 19 lowa 67+ 69+ 67+ sat 33 33 41 38 25t 27+ 16t 12+ Kansas 84 88 90 79 49 49 S6 50 23 27 21 18 Kentucky 92t 96 99 89 62 60 65 61 16t 22 19 14 Louisiana 109 107 109 97 71 68 76 67 22 23 15 15 Maine 92 82 70 57 44 41 40 31 36 30 20 18 Maryland 121 129 118 106 47 51 51 46 59 61 52 46 Massachusetts 86 97 87 79 30 32 38 32 45 53 38 37 Michigan 107 111 108 67 44 47 57 46 50 49 37 29 Minnesota 62 69 64 56 30 31 36 32 24 29 19 16 Mississippi 113 106 122 108 77 73 84 75 19 16 19 16 Missouri 95 99 100 86 53 55 63 54 29 30 22 19 Montana 82 74 81 65 42 39 46 39 28 24 24 17 Nebraska 75 75 71 62 37 37 41 39 27 27 20 14 Nevada 125 142 145 140 53 65 71 70 57 59 54 51 New Hampshire 89+ 87+ 62+ 571 32 33 31 29 46+ 43t 22+ 20+ New Jersey 113 112 97 97 36 39 39 35 63 60 45 50 New Mexico 116 124 129 110 70 72 80 71 30 35 30 22 New York 117 116 120 108 39 40 45 42 64 61 60 53 North Carolina 114 122 121 105 57 61 70 63 41 45 34 26 North Dakota 60 57 59 50 34 31 37 32 17 18 13 10 Ohio 96 96 93 81 50 52 58 50 33 31 21 18 Oklahoma 113t 105t 100+ 90t 67 62 70 63 29+ 27+ 14+ 13t Oregon 95 105 99 90 42 48 53 51 41 43 32 26 Pennsylvania 87 87 84 70 4'1 41 45 39 35 34 27 20 Rhode Island 89 56 96 87 37 38 48 42 40 36 36 32 South Carolina 102 114 110 98 61 65 70 63 26 33 23 20 South Dakota 70 69 74 59 42 44 48 39 18 15 14 10 Tennessee 104 110 112 100 60 64 71 66 29 31 24 18 Texas 131+ 117 123 113 73 69 79 73 39t 31 26 23 Utah 75 69 65 60 49 44 46 43 15 15 9 B Vermont 82 81 71 60 35 33 36 30 36 37 26 22 Virginia 106 106 101 87 47 46 52 46 45 46 35 30 Washington 103 109 107 85 43 47 51 45 46 47 42 29 West Virginia B7T 78t 85 73 55 50 56 50 19t 17+ 16 11 Wisconsin 73t 74 73 61 37 38 42 37 25t 26 21 15 Wyoming 98 82 B1 74 54 48 50 44 30 23 19 20 *Includes astimated number of pregnancies ending in miscarriages. tAbortion estimates are based on the proportion of abortions obtained by women of the same age In neighbaring or similar states Notas: Abortion data for 1996 are not exactly comparable with those for earlier years because of a change in the way state of residence was calculated. Data are (abulated according to the woman's age ai the pregnancy outcome. Even though for 1996 abortions have been tabulated according to state of residence where possible. in states with parental noirfication or consent requirements for minors. the preg- nancy and abortion rates may be too low because minors may have traveled to other states for abortion services. Teenage Pregnancy: Overall Trends and State-by-State Information, AGI. April 1999 04/27/99 22:18 FAX 011 National Vital Statistics Reports NUSS nchs From the CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION National Center for Health Statistics NWOO National Vital Statistics System Volume 47, Number 18 April 29, 1999 Births: Final Data for 1997 by Stephanie J. Ventura, M.A.; Joyce A. Martin, M.P.H.; Sally C. Curtin, M.A.; and T.J. Mathews, M.S., Division of Vital Statistics Abstract Highlights Objectives-This report presents 1997 data on U.S. births according Births in the United States declined very slightly in 1997, to to a wide variety of characteristics. Data are presented for maternal 3,880,894, the lowest number since 1987. The birth rate also demographic characteristics including age, live-birth order, race, Hispanic dropped in 1997, to 14.5 births per 1,000 total population, a record origin, marital status, and educational attainment; maternal lifestyle and low for the Nation. The fertility rate, which relates births to the health characteristics (medical risk factors, weight gain, and tobacco and number of women of childbearing age, declined In 1997 to 65.0 births alcohol use); medical care utilization by pregnant women (prenatal care, per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, matching the record low obstetric procedures, complications of labor and/or delivery, attendant at reported in 1976. birth, and method of delivery); and infant health characteristics (period of Fertility rates for women In raclal and Hispanic origin sub- gestation, birthweight, Apgar score, abnormal conditions, congenital anoma- groups increased for Puerto Rican, American Indian, and Asian or lies, and multiple births). Also presented are birth and fertility rates by age, Pacific Islander women, but declined for other groups by up to 3 percent. live-birth order, race, Hispanic origin, and marital status. Selected data Rates differ considerably among groups, with Mexican women having by mother's State of residence are shown including teenage birth the highest rate, 116.6 per 1,000 aged 15-44 years. Rates are suc- rates and total fertility rates, as well as data on month and day of cessively lower for non-Hispanic black, Puerto Rican, American Indian, birth, sex ratio, and age of father. Trends in fertility patterns and Asian or Pacific Islander, Cuban and non-Hispanic white women. matemal and infant characteristics are described and interpreted. The birth rate for teenagers continued to decline in 1997, falling Methods-Descriptive tabulations of data reported on the birth 4 percent to 52.3 births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years. The rate certificates of the 3.9 million births that occurred in 1997 are presented. for young teenagers 15-17 years declined 5 percent to 32.1 per 1,000, Results-Birth and fertility rates declined very slightly in 1997. Birth while the rate for older teenagers 18-19 years declined 3 percent to rates for teenagers fell 3 to 5 percent. Rates for women in their twenties 83.6. During 1991-97, the rate for ages 15-19 years dropped 16 per- changed very little, whereas rates for women in their thirties rose cent, while rates for teenagers 15-17 and 18-19 years fell 17 and 2 percent. The number of births and the birth rate for unmarried women each declined slightly In 1997 while the percent of births that were to unmarried women was unchanged. Smoking by pregnant women overall dropped again in 1997, but continued to Increase among teen- Acknowledgments agers. Improvements in prenatal care utilization continued. The This report was prepared under the general direction of Kenneth G. Keppel, Acling Chief of the Reproductive Statistics Branch (RSB). Nicholae F. Pace, cesarean delivery rate increased slightly after declining for 7 consecu- Chief of the Systems, Programming, and Statistical Resources Branch tive years. The proportion of multiple births continued to rise; higher (SPSRB), and Manju Sharma and Jaleh Mousavi of SPSRB provided order multiple births (e.g., triplets, quadruplets) rose by 14 percent in computer programming support and statistical tables. Thomas D. Dunn and Vanella Harrington of SPSRB and Melissa Park of RSB provided content 1997, following a 20 percent rise from 1995 to 1996. Key measures of review. Slaff of the Data Acquisition and Evaluation Branch carried out quality birth outcome-the percents of low birthweight and preterm births- evaluation and acceptance procedures lor the State dala files on which this increased, with particularly large increases in the preterm rate. These report le based. The Registration Melhode staff of the Division of Vital Statetics consulted with State vital statistics offices regarding the collection of changes are in large part the result of increases in multiple births. birth certificate data. This report was edited by Demarius V. Miller, typesel by Keywords: birth certificate maternal and infant health birth rates Jacqueline M. Davis, and graphics were produced by Jarmila Ogburn of the Publications Branch, Division of Date Services. maternal characteristics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC National Center for Health Statistics CONTENT CENTACL AND INVOICEMENT 012 04/27/99 22:19 FAX 2 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 11 percent, respectively. From 1991 to 1997, the rates for non-Hispanic a previous cesarean delivery (VBAC) Increased 50 percent between black and Puerto Rican teenagers dropped 24 to 27 percent. Teenage 1989 (18.9) and 1996 (28.3) but fell 3 percent from 1996 to 1997 (27.4). birth rates fell significantly in all but one State during 1991-97. The The percent of births delivered by forceps continued to decline (2.8 per- teenage pregnancy rate has continued to fall in the 1990's, as reflected cent in 1997) while the percent by vacuum extraction rose (6.2 percent in concurrent declines In birth and abortion rates. in 1997). Birth rates for women In their twentles, the peak childbearing The remarkable rise in multiple births continued in 1997; the ages, changed little in 1997. The rate for women 20-24 years declined number of twin births rose 3 percent (from 100,750 to 104,137), and the slightly to 110.0 per 1,000, while the rate for women 25-29 years rose number of triplets climbed 16 percent (from 5,298 to 6,148). Births in 1 percent to 113.8 per 1,000. Birth rates for women in their twenties have quadruplet and quintuplet and other higher order births were down been relatively stable over the past two decades. slightly, however. The twinning rate has increased 11 percent since 1990 Birth rates for women In their thirties increased 2 percent in (from 22.6 to 26.8 per 1,000), and by 42 percent since 1980 (from 18.9 1997, to 85.3 per 1,000 for women aged 30-34 years, and to 36.1 for per 1,000). The higher order multiple birth rate has more than doubled women aged 35-39 years. These rates have risen almost without just since 1991 (from 81.4 to 173.6 per 100,000), and has quadrupled interruption since the mid-to-late 1970's. However, the pace of increase since 1980 (from 37.0 per 100,000). has slowed in the 1990's, especially for women aged 30-34 years. The The rate of preterm birth (less than 37 completed weeks of birth rate for women aged 40-44 years also increased in 1997, to 7.1 gestation) increased sharply from 11.0 percent in 1996 to 11.4 percent per 1,000. in 1997. The percent of births bom preterm has risen 8 percent since The first birth rate declined in 1997 to its lowest level ever, 26.5 1990, and more than 20 percent since 1981 (from 9.4 percent). The first births per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years. Among teenagers, first recent upward trend in this rate has been partly driven by the rise in birth rates declined 3 to 5 percent. Rates for second births to teenagers multiple births that are at much greater risk of shorter gestations than who have had one birth changed little in 1997, after dropping sub- singletons. (The preterm rate for singletons was 10.0 percent compared stantially from 1991 to 1996. First birth rates for women in their thirties with 54.9 percent for twins, and 93.6 percent for higher order multiples.) rose again in 1997, continuing a long-term trend. The preterm birth rate was up for most racial/ethnic groups, but the The birth rate for unmarried women in 1997 was 44.0 births per largest rise (4 percent) was observed among births to non-Hispanic 1,000 unmarried women aged 15-44 years, 2 percent lower than in white mothers (from 9.5 to 9.9 percent). 1996 and 6 percent lower than its highest level, 46.9 in 1994. The The proportion of Infants bom low birthweight (LBW) rose again number of births to unmarried women declined slightly to 1,257,444 in for 1997 to 7.5 percent (from 7.4 percent for 1996), the highest level 1997, while the percent of all births occurring to unmarried women was reported since 1973. This rate has risen slowly over the last decade. unchanged at 32.4 percent. The birth rate for unmarried teenagers fell Low birthweight was up slightly among non-Hispanic white (6.4 to 2 percent in 1997 to 42.2 per 1,000, down 9 percent from its 1994 high, 6.5 percent) and Hispanic mothers (6.3 to 6.4 percent). The current year 46.4. rise in LBW was only partly attributable to the increase in multiple births; Cigarette smoking during pregnancy continued to decline in low birthweight among singleton births rose from 6.03 percent in 1996 1997, to 13.2 percent of women giving birth. Tobacco use during to 6.08 percent in 1997. The 1997 level of low birthweight was pregnancy has fallen steadily since 1989. However, smoking among unchanged among non-Hispanic black mothers from the previous year pregnant teenagers increased again in 1997, with particularly large at 13.1 percent. increases for black and Puerto Rican teenagers. In general, smoking rates are lowest for Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander women. Maternal smoking has a strong adverse impact on intant birthweight. Introduction In 1997. 12.1 percent of births to smokers compared with 7.1 percent of births to nonsmokers weighed less than 2,500 grams (5 lb 8 oz). This report presents detailed data on numbers and characteris- First trimester prenatal care improved for the 8th consecutive tics of births in 1997, birth and fertility rates, maternal lifestyle and year, rising from 81.9 in 1996 to 82.5 percent in 1997. Timely care has health characteristics, medical services utilization by pregnant women, risen among all race/ethnic groups for the 1990's, but gains have been and infant health characteristics. These data provide important infor- the most pronounced among groups with lower levels of care. Since mation on fertility patterns among American women by such charac- 1989, first trimester care has risen by at least 20 percent among teristics as age, Ilve-birth order, race, Hispanic origin, marital status, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Central and South American, and non-Hispanic and educational attainment Up-to-date information on these fertility black women, and by more than 15 percent among American Indian and patterns is critical to understanding population growth and change in Hawaiian mothers. Despite these improvements, rates of first trimester this country and in individual States. Data on maternal characteristics care are still low for American Indian, Mexican, and non-Hispanic black such as weight gain, tobacco and alcohol use, and medical risk women. factors are useful in accounting for differences in birth outcomes. Data on method of delivery show that the rate of cesarean Information on use of prenatal care, obstetric procedures, complica- delivery increased slightly between 1996 and 1997 (from 20.7 to tions of labor and/or delivery, attendant at birth and place of delivery. 20.8 percent) after declining for 7 consecutive years. The rate in 1997 and method of delivery by maternal demographic characteristics can was 9 percent lower than in 1989 (22.8 percent). The primary cesarean also help to explain differences in birth outcomes. It is very important rate was also 9 percent lower in 1996 and 1997 than in 1989 (14.6 first that data on birth outcomes, especially levels of low birthweight and cesareans per 100 women who had no previous cesarean in 1996 and preterm birth, be continuously monitored, because these variables are 1997 compared with 16.1 in 1989). The rate of vaginal birth following important predictors of infant mortality and morbidity. 04/27/99 22:19 FAX 013 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 3 A report of prellminary birth statistics for 1997 presented data on characteristics (except items on which length of gestation is calculated) selected topics based on a substantial sample (about 99 percent) of the are not imputed; see Technical notes. Births for which a particular 1997 birth file (1). The selected measures Included birth rates by age, characteristic is unknown are subtracted from the figures for total births race, and Hispanic origin of mother, and by live-birth order, and births that are used as denominators before percents, percent distributions, by marital status, prenatal care, cesarean delivery, and low birthweight. and medians are computed. Thus, for example, the proportion of women Findings for these selected measures based on the preliminary data are receiving care in the first trimester of pregnancy is computed on the essentially identical to those presented here based on final data. basis of births for which month pregnancy prenatal care began was In addition to the tabulations included in this report, more detailed reported. Levels of nonreporting vary substantially by specific Item and analysis is possible by using the natality public-use data tape, which by State. Table 1 in the Technical notes provides information on the is issued for each year. Birth data are also available in CD-ROM format percent of records with-missing information for each item by State for since 1991 (2). 1997. Readers should note that the levels of Incomplete reporting for some of the medical items are quite high in some States. Data for Connecticut, Hawaii, and Oklahoma are of particular concern. Methods Data shown in this report are based on 100 percent of the birth Demographic characteristics certificates registered in all States and the District of Columbia. More than 99 percent of births occurring in this country are registered (3). Births and birth rates Tables that show data by State also provide separate information for Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa; however, Number of births data for these areas are not included in totals for the United States. Data for American Samoa are available for the first time in 1997. The number of births in the United States declined very slightly in In this report, tabulations of births beginning with 1980 data are 1997, to 3,880,894, compared with 3,891,494 in 1996. Between 1995 by race of mother; for years prior to 1980, tabulations are by race of and 1997 the number of births fell less than half of 1 percent. The child. Details of the differences in tabulation procedure are described 1997 total is 7 percent fewer than the number in 1990, the most in the Technical notes. Text references to black births and black mothers recent high point in U.S. births and is the lowest recorded in a decade or white births and white mothers are used interchangeably. (see tables 1-12 for national and State birth data by age, Race and Hispanic origin are reported independently on the birth Ilve-birth order, race, and Hispanic origin). According to provisional certificate. In tabulations of birth data by race and Hispanic origin, date data for 1998, births have increased about 2 percent. for Hispanic persons are not further classified by race because the vast The number of births for most race and Hispanic origin groups majority of women of Hispanic origin are reported as white. Most tables increased In 1997 (tables 1 and 6). Increases of 1 to 2 percent were in this report show data for these categories: white, total; white, non- reported for non-Hispanic black, Puerto Rican, American Indian, Fili- Hispanic; black, total; black, non-Hispanic; and Hispanic. When data pino, Mexican, and Cuban births. The small overall decline in U.S. births other than birth rates for Hispanic subgroups are shown, they are reflects almost entirely the 1-percent decline in the number of births to presented for the following five groups: Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, non-Hispanic white women. Births to Central and South American, Central and South American, and other and unknown Hispanic. When Chinese, and Japanese women also declined-by less than 1 percent. reporting birth rates for Hispanic subgroups, births to Central and South Hawalian births fell 4 percent. American women are added to births to other and unknown Hispanic women because more detailed population data for Central and South Crude birth rate American women are not separately available. Data are shown for five The crude birth rate in 1997 was 14.5 live births per 1,000 total Asian or Pacific Islander (API) subgroups: Chinese, Japanese, population, a record low for the Nation. The 1997 rate was 1 percent Hawaiian, Filipino, and "other" API. In addition, eight States report data lower than in 1996 and 13 percent lower than in 1990 (16.7). The on API subgroups included In the "other" API category (Vietnamese, previous low point for the U.S. birth rate was recorded in 1975 and Aslan Indian, Korean, Samoan, Guamanian, and remaining API); see 1976 (14.6). Provisional data for 1998 suggest a small increase in the Technical notes. A report on births in 1992 to women in these API birth rate. subgroups has been published (4). U.S. and State-level birth and fertility rates in this report were computed on the basis of population denominators provided by the U.S. Fertility rate Bureau of the Census. Rates by State shown in this report may differ The fertility rate, which relates births to the number of women in from rates computed on the basis of other population estimates. Addi- the childbearing ages, was 65.0 live births per 1,000 women aged tional Information on the measurement of marital status, gestational age, 15-44 years in 1997, less than 1 percent below the 1996 rate (65.3). and birthweight; the computation of derived statistics and rates; popu- The fertility rate for 1997 was 8 percent below the rate in 1990 (70.9), lation denominators; random variation and relative standard error; and and matched the previous low recorded in 1976 (table 1 and the definitions of terms are presented in the Technical notes. figure 1). The decline in the fertility rate in the 1990's reverses an Information on births by age, race, or marital status of mother is 8-percent rise from 1986 to 1990. Provisional data for 1998 indicate imputed if it is not reported on the birth certificate. These items were an increase in the fertility rate. not reported for less than 1 percent of U.S. births in 1997. (See Fertility rates for most race and Hispanic origin groups Technical notes for additional information.) All other maternal and infant declined in 1997 (tables 1 and 6). Rates declined less than 1 percent 04/27/99 22:19 FAX 014 4 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 Table A. Birth rates for teenagers by age, race, and 5 200 Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1991, 1996, 180 and 1997 4 160 Number 140 Millions of births Rate per 1,000 woman aged 15-44 years (Rates per 1,000 women in specified group] Non-Hispanic 3 120 Year and age Total' While Black 100 Hispanic 2 80 10-14 years Rate 60 1997 1.1 0.4 3.4 2.3 1 1996. 1.2 40 0.4 3.8 2.6 1991² 1.4 0,5 4.9 2.4 20 0 0 15-19 years 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1997. 52.3 36.0 1997 90.8 97.4 NOTE: Beginning with 1959, trend lines are based on registered live births; trend lines 1996. 54.4 37.6 94.2 101.8 for 1930-59 are based on live births adjusted for underregistration. 1991² 62.1 43.4 118.9 108.7 Figure 1. Live births and fertility rates: United States, 15-17 years 1930-97 1997 32.1 19.4 62.6 68.3 1996 33.8 20.6 66.6 69.0 1991² 38.7 23.6 86.7 70.6 each for non-Hispanic black (72.4 per 1,000) and non-Hispanic white women (57.0). The rates for Mexican women (116.6), Cuban women 18-19 years (57.4), and "other" Hispanic women (which includes all births to Central 1997 89.6 61.9 134.0 144.3 and South American and other and unknown Hispanic women) (87.6) 1996, 86.0 63.7 136.6 151.1 1991² 94.4 70.5 163.1 158.5 fell by 2 to 3 percent each. The rates for Puerto Rican (71.7), American Indian (69.1), and API women (66.3) increased 1 percent each. Includes races other than white and black and origin not stated. The modest reductions in fertility rates for non-Hispanic white and 2See reference 5 for Information on reporting areas in 1991. black women indicate a slowdown in the steady downward trend in these rates in the 1990's. During the years 1990-96, the fertility rate 1991 (38.7) to 1997 (table 4 and figure 2). The number of births to for non-Hispanic white women declined 9 percent, and the rate for teenagers 15-17 years fell 3 percent from 1996 to 1997 to 180,154. non-Hispanic black women fell 19 percent. The increases in fertility The birth rate for older teenagers 18-19 years declined 3 percent rates for American Indian and API women in 1997 mark a halt, even to 83.6 per 1,000. This rate fell 12 percent from 94.5 in 1992 (its recent if temporarily, in the general downward trend in these rates during the high) to 1997. The number of births to older leenagers dropped just 1990's. 1 percent In 1997 to 303,066. The fertility rate for Hispanic women in 1997 was the lowest Teenage birth rates by race and Hispanic origin vary substan- reported since 1989 when data accounting for virtually all Hispanic births tially (tables 3, 4, 8, and 9). Rates in 1997 were highest for Mexican, in the United States first became available. Trends in fertility for Hispanic non-Hispanic black, Puerto Rican, and American Indian teenagers and women by subgroup for 1989-95 are presented in more detail in a lowest for non-Hispanic white, Cuban, and API teenagers, a pattem that recent report (5). has been observed since 1994. Between 1996 and 1997, teenage birth Age of mother rates declined for all race and Hispanic origin groups except Cuban and "other" Hispanic teenagers. Rates dropped 7 to 9 percent for Mexican Teenagers-The birth rate for the youngest teenagers was and Puerto Rican teenagers, and 3 to 4 percent for American Indian, 1.1 births per 1,000 females 10-14 years in 1997, matching the rate API, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic black teenagers. reported in 1980-83 (table 4). This rate has declined steadily since From 1991, when rates for teenagers generally were at a peak, 1994 (the rate was 1.4 in each year 1989 through 1994). The number to 1997, birth rates fell 24 to 27 percent for non-Hispanic black and of births to 10-14-year-olds fell 9 percent from 1996 to 1997, to Puerto Rican teenagers. Rates dropped 14 to 17 percent for non- 10,121, the lowest total reported since 1984 (9,965). The decline in Hispanic white, American Indian, and API teenagers. The rate for the number of births to very young teenagers occurred solely as a Mexican teenagers has declined 4 percent since 1991. result of the reduction in the birth rate: the number of female The factors accounting for the current downtum in teenage birth teenagers has increased steadily in the 1990's (6). rates are discussed in a recent report (6). Briefly, the proportion of The birth rate for teenagers 15-19 years fell 4 percent to 52.3 teenagers who are sexually experienced has stabilized in the mid- per 1,000. This rate was 16 percent lower than the rate in 1991 (62.1) 1990's, reversing the steady Increases over the past two decades. (table A). The recent declines in the teenage birth rate partly reverse Moreover, teenagers are more likely to use contracaptives at first the 24-percent increase that occurred from 1986 to 1991. State-specific intercourse, especially condoms (7,8). birth rates for teenagers are discussed in the section "Births and birth Teenage pregnancy rates (based on the sum of live births, induced rates by State." abortions, and fetal losses) have also declined in recent years (6, 9, 10, Birth rates for teenage subgroups 15-17 and 18-19 years also 11). The pregnancy rale for teenagers 15-19 years fell 12 percent from fell between 1996 and 1997. The rate for teenagers 15-17 years 117 per 1,000 in 1991 to 103 in 1995, reversing an 11-percent rise from declined 5 percent to 32.1 per 1,000. This rate fell by 17 percent from 1986 to 1991 (6, 10). Further declines in the teenage pregnancy rate 04/27/99 22:19 FAX 015 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 5 300 300 20-24 years 200 200 25-29 years 100 100 BO 18-19 years ao Rate per 1,000 women in specified group 30-34 years 60 60 15-19 years 40 40 15-17 years 20 20 35-39 years 10 10 8 8 6 6 40-44 years 4 4 3 3 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1965 1990 1995 1997 NOTE Rates are platted on a log scale, Figure 2. Birth rates by age of mother: United States, 1960-97 since 1995 are indicated by the steady decline in the teenage birth rate 14 percent higher than the rate in 1990 (31.7). Because the birth rate and declines in abortions among teenagers, according to preliminary and the number of women each increased, the number of births to data (12). women aged 35-39 years rose again in 1997, to a record high, 409,710 Women aged 20 years and over: Women in their twentles-The (13). Among women in their thirties, birth rates were highest for API, birth rate for women aged 20-24 years declined slightly in 1997, Mexican, and "other" Hispanic women (tables 3 and 8). resuming the steady decline reported for 1990-95 (tables 3, 4, 8, and Women In their forties-The birth rate for women aged 40-44 9). The rate for women aged 20-24 years was 110.0 per 1,000 in 1997. years increased from 6.8 per 1,000 to 7.1 in 1997. This rate rose The birth rate for women aged 25-29 years rose 1 percent in 1997 to 29 percent from 1990 (5.5) to 1997. From 1981 to 1997, the rate 113.8 per 1,000; this rate increased for 2 consecutive years, following increased by 87 percent; the 1997 rate matches the previous high steady declines during 1990-95. The rates for women in their twenties, recorded in 1971. The number of births in this age group rose 6 percent the principal childbearing ages, have been relatively stable over the past to 76,084, the highest number reported since 1965. two decades. The birth rate for women aged 45-49 years increased from 0.3 Birth rates for women in age groups 20-24 and 25-29 years were births per 1,000 in 1996 to 0.4 In 1997. The number of births to women consistently highest for Mexican women. For example, the rate for in this age group rose 9 percent to 3,333, the highest number recorded Mexican women aged 20-24 years, 204.9 per 1,000, was nearly three since 1969 (3,398). times the rate for API women in this age group (70.5). Births to women aged 50 years and over-In this report, sta- Women In their thirtles-Birth rates for women in their thirties tistics are shown for births to women aged 50-54 years in 1997, the rose 2 percent in 1997. Rates for women in these age groups have first time this information is available since 1963. For the years 1964-96, generally increased steadily since the late 1970's, a pattern unlike any mother's age was edited for ages 10-49 years (3). Additional infor- other age group (table 4). The rate for women aged 30-34 years mation on the editing procedures is presented in the Technical notes. increased in 1997 to 85.3 per 1,000. This rate increased by 63 percent Because of the recent advances in fertility-enhancing therapies, an since 1975. Most of this increase occurred by 1990. The number of increasing number of women are giving birth at age 50 years and over. births to women aged 30-34 years dropped 1 percent in 1997, reflecting In 1997, 144 births were reported to women aged 50-54 years (tables 2 the 3-percent reduction in the number of women (13). and 7). This number is too small for computing an age-specific birth rate. The birth rate for women In their late thirties increased 2 per- Therefore, in computing birth rates by age of mother, births to women cent to 36.1 per 1,000 women aged 35-39 years. This rate has aged 50-54 years have been included with births to women aged 45-49 increased without interruption since 1978 (19.0) by 90 percent. Although years; the denominator for the rate is women aged 45-49 years. the pace of increase slowed in the 1990's, the 1997 rate was still 04/27/99 22:20 FAX 016 6 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18. April 29, Although sustained increases in birth rales have been most long- Births and birth rates by State lasting for women aged 30 years and over (14), the pace of increase has slowed since 1990 as noted above (table 4). Among the factors Birth data by race and by Hispanic origin for 1997 are shown in contributing to the slowdown include declining birth expectations among tables 10-12 for the 50 States and the District of Columbia, Puerto childless women and relatively high proportions of currently childless Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. The American women aged 35-44 years reporting impaired fecundity according to the Indian, Asian or Pacific Islander (API) and Hispanic populations (and 1995 National Survey of Family Growth (7. 15, 16). Hispanic subgroups) are highly concentrated geographically. The number of births increased in 28 States and Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam and declined in 22 States and the District of Live-birth order Columbia. Increases and declines of up to 2 percent were found In 41 The first birth rate dropped 1 percent in 1997 to 26.5 first births of the States, Puerto Rico, and Guam. The number increased 4 percent per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years (table 5). This was the lowest in Georgia and Oklahoma and 6 percent in the Virgin Islands and level ever recorded. The first birth rate dropped 9 percent compared declined 6 percent in Hawaii and the District of Columbia. with 1990 (29.0), its recent high point. The rate for third births rose Crude birth rates by State ranged from 11 births per 1,000 slightly. Birth rates for other birth orders were unchanged. population (Maine, Vermont, and West Virginia) to 21 per 1,000 (Utah) While the first birth rate declined 1 percent overall, there were (table 10). Birth rates per 1,000 total population declined in 32 States substantial differences in the trends by age of mother (table 3; tabular and the District of Columbia, increased in 9 States, Puerto Rlco, the data not shown for 1996 and earlier years). Rates declined for teenage Virgin Islands, and Guam, and were unchanged in 9 States; changes subgroups 15-17 and 18-19 years and for women aged 20-24 years were no more than 2 percent in most States. Changes were not by 3 to 5 percent; the rate was unchanged for women aged 25-29 years. significant in 29 of the States and the District of Columbia or in Puerto In contrast, first birth rates rose 3 percent for women in their thirties. Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. Statistically significant declines of Reflecting these variations by age, the proportion of all first births 4 to 5 percent were recorded for Califomia, Hawaii, and South Dakota, occurring to women aged 30 years and over increased slightly in 1997 whereas Oklahoma recorded a significant increase of 4 percent. to 23 percent compared with just 5 percent in 1975 (14). First birth rates Fertility rates per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years ranged from for API women aged 30-34 and 35-39 years were substantially higher a low of 50 (Maine and Vermont) to a high of 89 (Utah) (table 10). Rates in 1997 than for any other group. declined in 21 States and the District of Columbia, increased in 25 The birth rate for second births to teenagers who have had a States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam, and were unchanged first birth was essentially unchanged in 1997 compared with 1996, after in 4 States. Changes in most States were no more than 2 percent and falling 21 percent from 1991 to 1996 (6). All of the decline in teenage were not statistically significant in 33 States and the District of Columbia, birth rates in 1997 was thus due to declines in first birth rates. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. Significant declines of 5 percent each were reported for Hawaii and South Dakota, while a 4-percent increase was found for Oklahoma. Total fertility rate State-specific total fertility rates for 1997 are shown in table 10. The total fertility rate (TFR) indicates the number of births that a These rates provide a summary measure of lifetime fertility at the State hypothetical group of 1,000 women would have if they experienced level; rates for 1980, 1990, and 1996 have been published (17-19). throughout their childbearing years the age-specific birth rates Rates by State for 1997 vary substantially, from a low of 1,573.5 (or 1.57 observed in a given year. This measure shows the potential impact of births per woman) for Vermont to a high of 2,632.0 (2.63 births per current fertility patterns on completed family size. Because it is woman) for Utah. Differences in the TFR's and changes between 1996 computed from age-specific birth rates, the TFR is age-adjusted; it is and 1997 by State are quite similar to those In the general fertility rate. not affected by changes over time in age composition. The TFR in 1997 was 2,032.5, less than 1 percent higher than in Birth rates for teenagers 1996 (tables 4 and 9). The TFR has Increased from 1995-by 1 percent Birth rates for teenagers by age group and State are shown for overall-following a 3-percent decline from 1990 to 1995. The increase 1997 in table 10. Rates per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years ranged in the TFR resulted from the rise in age-specific birth rates for all women by State from 26.9 (Vermont) to 73.7 (Mississippi). The highest rate in age groups 25-49 years, which more than compensated for the was reported for Guam, 106.3. Birth rates for teenagers have been declines in the teenage birth rates. declining in the United States since 1991. Between 1991 and 1997, The U.S. total fertility rate remains below "replacement" level teenage birth rates fell in all States and the District of Columbia and (2,100), the rate at which a given generation can exactly replace itself. the Virgin Islands; declines were statistically significant in all States The TFR has been below "replacement" since 1971 (2,266.5). TFR's except for Rhode Island (table B). Declines exceeded 20.0 percent in vary substantially among racial and Hispanic origin groups. In 1997, as 10 States and the District of Columbia. More detailed information on in recent years, the TFR was above "replacement" for Mexican, non- current trends and variations in State-specific teenage birth rates by Hispanic black, and Puerto Rican women. Rates were below "replace- age, race, and Hispanic origin is presented in a recent report (6). ment" for American Indian, API, Cuban, and non-Hispanic white women (tables 4, 9, 13, and 14). Changes between 1996 and 1997 in most Sex ratio TFR's were 2 percent or less. State-specific TFR's for 1997 are dis- cussed in the next section. There were 1,985,596 male live births in 1997 compared with 1,895,298 female live births. These numbers ylelded a sex ratio of 04/27/99 22:20 FAX 017 National Vital Statistics Report, VoL 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 7 Table B. Birth rates for teenagers 15-19 years by State, 1991 and 1997, and percent change, 1991-97: United States and each State, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa (Birth rates per 1,000 estimated female population aged 15-19 years in each area] Percent Percent change, change, Slate 1991 1997 1991-97 State 1991 1997 1991-97 United States' 62.1 523 -15.8 Nebraska 42.4 37.2 -123 Nevada 75.3 67.7 -10,1 Alabama 73.9 66.6 -9.9 New Hampshire 33.3 28.6 -14.1 65.4 44.8 -31.8 New Jersey 41.6 35.0 -15.9 Arizona 80.7 69.7 -13.6 New Mexico 79.8 68.4 -14.3 A 79.8 72.9 -8.6 New York 46.0 38.8 -15.7 Callfornia 74.7 57.3 -23.3 North Carolina 70.5 61.3 -13.0 Colorado 58.2 48.2 -17.2 North Dakota 35.6 30.1 -15.4 Connecticut. 40.4 38.1 -10.6 Ohio 60.5 49.8 -17.7 Delaware 61.1 55.8 -8,7 Oklahoma 72.1 64.3 -10.8 District of Columbia 114.4 91.0 -20.5 Oregon 54.9 46.9 -14.8 Florida 68.8 57.7 -16.1 Pennsylvania 46.9 37.3 -20.5 Georgia 76,3 67.2 -11.9 Rhode Island 45.4 427 -5.9" 58.7 43.8 -25.4 South Carolina 72.9 61.4 -15.8 Idaho 53.9 4a.3 -19.7 South Dakota 47.5 39.7 -16.4 Illnois 64.8 54.7 -15.6 Tennessee 75.2 64.5 -14.2 Indiana 60.5 54.2 -10.4 Texas 78.9 71.7 -9.1 lowa 42.8 35.7 -16.2 Utah 48.2 42.6 -11.6 Kansas 55.4 48.5 -12.5 Vermont 39.2 26.9 -31,4 Kentucky 68.9 59,8 -13.5 Virginia 53.5 44.2 -17.4 Louisiana 78,1 66.3 -129 Washington 53.7 42.5 -20.9 Maine 43.5 32.0 -20.4 West Virginia 57.8 49.1 -15.1 Maryland 54.3 43.9 -19.2 Wisconsin. 43.7 35.9 -17.8 usetts 37.8 31.7 -18.1 Wyoming 54.2 43.3 -20.1 Michigan 59.0 43.9 -25.6 Minnesota 37.3 320 -14.2 Puerto Rico 724 77.8 7.5 Mississippi 85.8 73.7 -13.9 Virgin Islands 77.9 66.0 -15.3 Missouri. 64.5 51.5 -20.2 Guam 96.7 106.3 11.1** Montana 46.7 37.6 -19.5 American Samoa 43.9 - Not significant at P < 0.05. Data not available. "Excludes data for Puerto Rico, Virgin tstands, Guam, and American Samoa. 1,048 male per 1,000 female live births (tables 13 and 14). The sex was 81.5. As in past years, births occurred most frequently on ratio has changed very little over the last 50 years and was 1,047 in Tuesdays with an index of 113.8 in 1997 (table 16). 1996. Similar to previous years, Asian or Pacific Islander mothers had A weekend deficit is apparent for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, the highest sex ratio (1,072), followed by non-Hispanic white mothers but is far larger for cesarean deliveries, particularly repeat cesareans. (1.052). Hispanic mothers (1,040), American Indian mothers (1,036), In 1997 the Sunday index for vaginal births was 78.2, compared with and non-Hispanic black mothers (1,031). 63.9 for primary cesareans and 37.7 for repeat cesareans. Month of birth Births to unmarried women Monthly birth rates in 8 months of 1997 were below the rates for The birth rate for unmarried women in 1997 was 44.0 births the same months observed in 1996. The peak months of occurrence per 1,000 unmarried women aged 15-44 years, 2 percent lower than of births in 1997 were July, August, and September (table 15). When In 1996 (44.8), and 6 percent below its highest level, 46.9 in 1994. the seasonal component is removed from the monthly birth rates, the The number of births to unmarried women declined slightly, to underlying trends can be observed. All months except for April, June, 1,257,444 in 1997. The percent of all births occurring to unmar- and December had the lowest seasonally adjusted birth rates in at ried women was unchanged at 32.4 percent in 1997. (See table C least 20 years. The rate for August 1997 was the lowest observed in and tables 17 and 18,) the more than 60 years for which monthly seasonal adjustments are The procedures for reporting the mother's marital status available (3, 20). changed In California, Nevada, and New York City beginning January 1, 1997. California and Nevada now report the mother's marital status Day of the week of birth from a direct question. The question is on the California birth certificate. Nevada obtains this information from the electronic birth registration Variation in the daily pattern of births can be measured by an process; the question does not appear on certified or paper copies of index of occurrence. In 1997 the Sunday index was 73.2, an the Nevada certificate. New York City infers marital status and changed indication that there were nearly 27 percent fewer births on Sundays its procedures beginning in 1997. The reporting changes in California than the daily average, considered to be 100.0. The Saturday index and New York City, which account for 17 percent of U.S. births, are 04/27/99 22:20 FAX 018 8 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 Table C. Number, rate, and percent of births to unmarried procedures; see Technical notes. The reporting changes in New York women, and birth rate for married women: United States, City affected the overall data and the data by age, with large decreases 1980 and 1985-97 found for all age groups. If these reporting changes had not occurred, Births lo unmarried women statistics for nonmarital births would have been unchanged in New York Birth rate for Year Number Rale' Percent2 City (21, 22). It is important to note that as a result of the changes married women³ implemented by California, Nevada, and New York City, their birth data 1997 1,257,444 44.0 32.4 84.3 by marital status are more accurate in 1997 than in prior years. The 1 1,260,306 44.8 324 83.7 factors affecting the birth data by marital status are discussed in more 1995 1,253,976 45.1 322 83.7 1994, 1,289,592 detail in the Technical notes. 46.9 32.6 83.8 1993 1,240,172 45.3 31.0 86.8 Birth rates for unmarried women vary considerably by race 1992 1,224,876 45.2 30.1 89.0 and Hispanic origin. In 1997 the rates per 1,000 unmarried women 1991 1,213,789 45.2 29.5 89.9 1,165,384 43.8 28.0 93.2 were 27.0 per 1,000 for non-Hispanic white women, 73.4 for black 1,094,169 41.6 27.1 91.9 women, and 91.4 for Hispanic women, The birth rate for unmarried black 1,005,299 38.5 25.7 90.8 women has declined 19 percent since 1989 (90.7). The birth rate for 1987 933,013 38.0 24.5 90.0 878,477 34.2 23.4 90.7 unmanied Hispanic women in 1997, 91.4 per 1,000, was at its lowest 1 828,174 328 22.0 93.3 level since 1990 (89.6). 665,747 29.4 18.4 97.0 Birth rates for unmarried women by age continue to be highest 'Births to unmarried women per 1,000 unmarried women aged 15-44 years. for Women aged 18-19 and 20-24 years, followed closely by women -Pe of all births to unmarried women. aged 25-29 years (figure 3). Rates for younger teenagers and women Births to married women per 1,000 married women aged 15-44 years. In age groups 30 years and over are considerably lower (tables 17 and 18). Among teenagers and women aged 20-24 years, rates for unmar- discu in some detail in this section (and the Technical notes) ried black and Hispanic women on average were 3 to 4 times the rates becal of their potential impact on national statistics on births to for non-Hispanic white women in the same age groups. Among age unmarried women. Prior to 1997. the mother's marital status was groups 25-29 years and over, rates were considerably higher for inferred in California by comparing the surnames of the mother, father, Hispanic women than for black or non-Hispanic white women. and child. Beginning in 1997, two changes were implemented. First, a Changes in age-specific birth rates for unmarried women have law went into effect mandating that the father's name could not be been affected by the changes in reporting procedures for Califomia and included on the birth certificate unless the parents were married or a New York City described above. However, in most cases, the one-year paternity affidavit was filed. Second, a direct question on the mother's changes for 1996-97 reinforce and enhance changes already underway marital status, similar to the one in effect in most other States, was since 1994. Therefore this summary of trends will focus on the longer- added to the California birth certificate (see Technical notes). Reporting term changes since 1994. The birth rates for unmanied teenagers procedures for marital status in California, as well as the procedures 15-17 and 18-19 years declined 12 and 7 percent, respectively, from in Nevada, are now essentially the same as those in most other States. 1994. The rate for young black teenagers has dropped steeply, by The mother's marital status is inferred in New York City, but the 19 percent since 1994. Birth rates for women in age groups 20-24 procedures for inferring this information changed beginning in 1997. through 40-44 years have fluctuated since 1994; rates in 1997 were Beginning in 1997, the mother is assumed to be unmarried if the father's 2 to 5 percent lower than In 1994. These patterns were generally found name is missing from the birth certificate, or if a patemity affidavit was for all population groups. filed; these are the same procedures that have been in effect in the The proportion of all births occurring to unmarried women was balance of New York for many years. Prior to 1997, the inferential criteria unchanged at 32.4 percent in 1997. The proportions for subgroups in in New York City had also included a comparison of the sumames of 1997 were 21.5 percent, non-Hispanic white; 69.4 percent, non- the mother and father. Hispanic black; and 40,9 percent, Hispanic; each changed very little in A comparison of the changes in nonmarital births for the entire recent years (see tables 13, 14, 17, and 19 for 1997 data). United States and for California and New York City separately shows Changes in the proportion of births to unmarried women are that these changes had little impact on the national totals and relatively affected by trends in birth rates for married as well as unmarried women, little impact on the total numbers for California. As a direct result of the and the number of unmarried women (table C). The proportion of births reporting changes in California, the national numbers and proportions to unmanied women has changed very little since 1994 even though of nonmarital births tended to increase for women aged 15-24 years the number and rate of births for unmarried women have generally and to decline for women aged 25 years and over. When the inferential declined, because total births- mostly births to married women-have procedures were in effect prior to 1997, births to older women who had also declined. Trends in the factors affecting the proportion of births to retained their birth surname after marriage were often erroneously unmarried women should be kept in mind when examining trends in the inferred as nonmarital because the parents' current surnames did not proportion (23). match. For California, the changes in nonmarital birth patterns by age The numbers and proportions of births to unmarried women were compensating, so that the overall levels of nonmarital births are by State and by race and Hispanic origin for 1997 are shown in table 19 only modestly higher in 1997 compared with 1996. There is a similar for the 50 States and the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin effect for Nevada, although the percent unmarried based on the direct Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, The numbers increased in 32 question is somewhat lower than the percent based on the inferential States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam and declined In 18 019 04/27/99 22:20 FAX National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 9 80 There is considerable varlation in educational attainment among 70 race and Hispanic origin groups. Among women giving birth in 1997, 20-24 years 60 18-19 years 87 percent of non-Hispanic white mothers had completed high school, 25-29 years compared with 73 percent of non-Hispanic black mothers, and 50 per- 50 Rate per 1,000 unmarried women in specific group cent of Hispanic mothers. Although the overall proportion of Hispanic 40 mothers with at least 12 years of schooling was low, there was tre- 30-34 years mendous variation among Hispanic subgroups, ranging from 44 percent 30 15-17 years of Mexican mothers to 86 percent of Cuban mothers (table 14). Thirty 15-19 years percent of non-Hispanic white mothers had at least 4 years of college compared with 11 percent of non-Hispanic black mothers and 7 percent 20 of Hispanic mothers. Only two-thirds of American Indian mothers had 35-39 years 12 or more years of schooling, whereas nearly all Japanese (98 percent) and Filipino mothers (93 percent) had attained this educational level, the highest of any group (table 13). 10 9 Maternal lifestyle and health characterIstics 8 1980 1985 1990 1995 1997 Weight gain NOTE: Rates are plotted on a log scale. Maternal weight gain is one of the components in the complex Figure 3. Birth rates for unmarried women, by age of relationship between lifestyle characteristics of the mother and the mother: United States, 1980-97 development of the fetus (25). In 1990 the National Academy of Sciences published weight-gain guidelines that varied according to mother's body mass index (BMI), which is calculated from her States and the District of Columbia. Similarly, increases in the propor- prepregnancy weight and height. The guidelines recommend that tions exceeded declines: the proportion increased in 32 States, Puerto women who are underweight (low BMI) gain 28-40 pounds, those Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam, declined in 15 States and the District who are of normal weight (average BMI) gain 25-35 pounds, those of Columbia, and was unchanged in three States. who are overweight (high BMI), 15-25 pounds, and obese women, not more than 15 pounds (26). Information on maternal weight gain is collected on the birth Age of father certificate, but information on the mother's prepregnancy weight and The birth rate per 1,000 men aged 15-54 years declined for height is not. Therefore, it is not possible to determine whether the the seventh straight year in 1997 to 50.4 (table 20). This rate fell by weight gain was within the recommendations for the mother's BMI. 14 percent between 1990 and 1997, following a 7-percent increase Differences between subgroups in maternal weight gain may reflect during 1986-90. Information on age of father is often missing on birth differences in the proportion of mothers who gained outside the rec- certificates of children born to unmarried women. Age of father was ommended range but could also be the result of group differences in not reported for 15 percent of births In 1997. The procedures for maternal height and prepregnancy weight. computing birth rates by age of father are described in the Technical In 1997 all States except California reported information on weight notes. gain. Births to mothers residing in these States accounted for 86 percent of all births in the United States. In 1997 the majority of women (64 percent) gained 26 pounds or more during pregnancy (table 22). Educational attainment The median weight gain was 30.5 pounds in 1997 and changed very The educational attainment of women who give birth is important little during the 1989-97 period. Despite the consistency of the median because higher educational attainment is associated with more timely weight gain, the percent of mothers who gained at either end of the receipt of prenatal care and fewer lifestyle and health behaviors that weight gain spectrum was higher in 1997 than in 1989-weight gains are detrimental to birth outcome (discussed in later sections). of less than 16 pounds increased from 9.4 percent In 1989 to 11.1 per- Data from the birth certificate show that the educational attainment cent in 1997 while weight gains of 46 pounds or more increased from of women who gave birth increased substantially over the last few 9.1 percent in 1989 to 11.4 percent in 1997. decades, partly reflecting the increases in educational attainment of all The weight gain of the mother during pregnancy varied con- women during the time period (24). More than three-fourths of women siderably by period of gestation. Mothers who had preterm infants who gave birth in 1997 had at least 12 years of schooling (78 percent) (gestations of under 37 completed weeks) gained about 3 pounds less and 23 percent had at least 4 years of college (table 21). The percent during pregnancy (27.4 pounds) than mothers who had babies with of mothers with at least a high school diploma increased with advancing gestations of 40 weeks and over (30.8 pounds). The median weight gain age. to 90 percent for women who gave birth in their thirties, and then for non-Hispanic white women (30.8 pounds) was about a pound higher declined slightly for mothers 40 years of age and over (88 percent). The than for either non-Hispanic black women (29.6 pounds) or Hispanic percent of mothers with at least 4 years of college was highest for women (29.B pounds). mothers 35 years of age and over (42 percent). The median educational The percent of non-Hispanic black, American Indian, and Mexican attainment for all mothers in 1997 was 12.8 years. mothers who had weight gains of less than 16 pounds (16.7, 15.3, and 04/27/99 22:21 FAX 020 10 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1 14.8 percent, respectively) was much higher than for Chinese (6.4 per- Medical risk factors during pregnancy can also vary greatly by cent), Cuban (7.3 percent). Filipino (8.4 percent), or non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity. For example, for 1997, pregnancy-associated hyper- mothers (9.4 percent) (tables 24 and 25). These differences in weight tension complicated nearly 5 percent of American Indian pregnancies, gain are reflected in differences among groups in the percent of births but less than 2 percent of Japanese (tables 27 and 28). bom preterm. Data on weight gain for Hawallans (table 24) are unre- liable because of incomplete reporting In Hawaii. Tobacco use during pregnancy Within Hispanic subgroups, the percent of Mexican mothers who gained less than 16 pounds (14.8 percent) was twice as high as for Smoking during pregnancy continued to decline according to Cuban mothers (7.3 percent) while the remaining groups were inter- birth certificate data. In 1997, 13.2 percent of women giving birth were mediate (table 25). reported to have smoked, down 3 percent compared with 1996 Maternal weight gain has been shown to have a positive (13.6 percent) and 32 percent since 1989 (19.5 percent), when this correlation with the birthweight of the Infant (27). This relationship information first became available on the birth certificate (32). Tobacco is substantiated by the data In table 23. The percent of infants with low use was reported in a comparable manner on the birth certificate In birthweight drops steadily with increasing weight gain through 45 1997 by 46 States, the District of Columbia, and New York City, pounds, from 14.5 to 4.8 percent, and then increases slightly for comprising 80 percent of U.S. births. Comparable Information was not mothers who gained 46 pounds or more (5.3 percent). This pattern is available for California, Indiana, South Dakota, and the remainder of generally replicated when the data are examined according to the period New York State. (See tables 24, 25, and 29-32 for 1997 data.) of gestation. Some studies have suggested that smoking may be underreported on birth certificates due to a variety of factors, Including the lack of a specific time reference for smoking status, variations in the source of Medical risk factors this information for each birth, and the growing stigma associated with Maternal medical risk factors can severely complicate pregnancy smoking (33-36). Nevertheless, trends in maternal smoking based on and result in poor birth outcomes, particularly when not adequately the birth certificate are generally consistent with those reported for treated (28-30). Sixteen medical risk factors affecting pregnancy are recent years from the National Survey of Family Growth, and variations separately identified on the birth certificate. Although data for this item in smoking among population subgroups found in birth certificate data were missing from only 1.2 percent of records for 1997, birth have been corroborated in other studies (7. 37-39). certificate data may underreport medical risk factor prevalence (31). Tobacco use during pregnancy is associated with a variety of Also, rates for less common medical risk factors and for smaller adverse outcomes, including low birthweight, intrauterine growth retar- population groups can vary widely from year to year and should be dation, and infant mortality, as well as negative consequences for child used with caution. health and development (40-42). The rate of pregnancy-associated hypertension, the most fre- Maternal smoking declined or was unchanged In most racial quently reported medical risk factor, rose for the sixth consecutive year, and Hispanic origin groups; smoking rates increased for Chinese and from 35.9 to 36.8 per 1,000 for 1996-97. (See table 26 for 1997 data.) Hawaiian women. As in previous years, rates were highest for non- The rate for this risk factor has risen among all age and race and ethnic Hispanic white, American Indian, and Hawaiian women, and lowest for groups since the early 1990's. Rates for the related hypertensive Mexican, Cuban, Central and South American, and Asian or Pacific disorders, chronic hypertension and eclampsia, were largely Islander women (API) (except Hawaiian) (tables 24 and 25). The unchanged for 1997, at 6.9 and 3.3 per 1,000, respectively, and have generally very low smoking rates found for Mexican, Central and South not risen notably during the 1990's. American, Chinese, and Filipino women from birth certificate data have Diabetes and anemia are the second and third most frequently been confirmed by other studies (38, 39). Women born In the 50 States reported complications of pregnancy. The diabetes rate was 26.4 per and the District of Columbia had substantially higher smoking rates than 1,000 for the current year compared with 26.3 for 1996, and the anemia women bom outside these areas, a pattern that has been described rate was 20.2, compared with 19.6 per 1,000. elsewhere (tables 24 and 25) (43). The prevalence of acute or chronic lung disease (e.g., asthma, Maternal smoking among teenagers rose about 2 percent tuberculosis) was 9.7 per 1,000 for 1997, higher than the 1996 level of overall, the third consecutive year of increase (figure 4) (35). The 6.3. Although still quite rare, the level of lung disease has more than smoking rate among non-Hispanic black teenagers 15-19 years rose tripled since 1990 (3.0) with large Increases found among all age and 12 percent from 1996 to 1997 (6.6 percent) and has increased by racial/ethnic groups. The reported rate of hydramnios/ollgohydramnios one-third since 1994 (5.0 percent) (see table 30 for 1997 data). The rate (the excess or shortage of amniotic fluid) has also been on the rise since for non-Hispanic white teenagers increased 2 percent (29.2 percent); data on this risk factor first became available and has more than doubled their rates are 4 to 5 times the rates for non-Hispanic black teenagers. during the 1990's (from 5.9 to 13.0 between 1990 and 1997). Non-Hlspanic white women aged 18-19 years had the highest smoking Medical risk factor rates often differ widely by maternal age. rate of any group, 29.6 percent (table 30). Smoking rates rose as well Anemia, for example, is more common among younger mothers (28.6 in 1997 for Puerto Rican teenagers. Smoking during pregnancy gen- for mothers under 20 years of age compared with 17.3 for mothers 40 erally declined for women in age groups 20-39 years. Patterns of years of age and over), but younger mothers are much less likely to smoking rates and trends by age, race, and Hispanic origin are have chronic conditions such as diabetes (8.2 compared with 64.9). described in detail in a recent NCHS report (35). Some risk factors, however, such as pregnancy-assoclated hyperten- Among smokers, the proportion smoking at least half a pack sion, follow a U-shaped pattern, with the highest levels at the extremes of cigarettes dally has declined steadily in recent years-to 32 percent of the maternal age distribution. in 1997 (compared with 42 percent in 1989) (32). Non-Hispanic white 04/27/99 22:21 FAX 021 National Vital Stalistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 11 tables 24 and 25 for 1997 data) (19, 32). A recent study based on an 25 20-24 years analysis of responses by nearly 6,000 pregnant women in the Center 20 for Disease Control and Prevention's nationally representative Behav- loral Risk Factor Surveillance System, found that about 15 percent of 15 15-19 years women used alcohol during pregnancy in 1995. The researchers also 30-34 years reported that alcohol use declined from 1988 (23 percent) to 1992 25-29 years 35-39 years (10 percent) before rising to 15 percent in 1995 (48). Percent 40-49 years The nature of the birth certificate questions on alcohol use appar- 10 ently contribute to the underreporting because they focus on the number of drinks per week, whereas other studies Inquire about drinks per month. Women who drink one to two drinks per month may believe that Less than 15 years their alcohol consumption is too little to report In response to the birth certificate questions. The stigma associated with alcohol use also 5 contributes to the underreporting (25, 48). 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 NOTE: California, Indiana, New York State, and South Dakota did not report smoking Medical services utilization during pregnancy for 1990-97. New York City for 1890-1993, Oklahoma for 1990. Percents are plotted on a log scale. Prenatal care Figure 4. Percent of mothers who smoked during pregnancy by age: Total reporting areas, 1990-97 The percent of women beginning prenatal care In the first trimester of pregnancy rose to 82.5 for 1997, from 81.9 in 1996. Essentially stagnant during the 1980's, first trimester care has risen mothers and older mothers are more likely than other mothers to smoke from 75.5 percent since 1989 (table D). The proportion of mothers half a pack or more (tables 29 and 31). with delayed (care beginning In the third trimester) or no care, Rates of smoking by maternal educational attainment are was 3.9 percent for the current year, compared with 4.0 percent for persistently highest for women with 9-11 years of education, 26 percent 1996. The proportion of women with late or no care worsened during in 1997, and lowest for women with 4 years or more of college, 2 percent the 1980's, but has Improved from the high of 6.4 percent reported for (table 31). Even among women aged 20 years and over, smoking rates 1989 (49). (See tables 33-35 for 1997 data.) were highest for mothers who attended but did not graduate from high The effects of prenatal care are difficult to measure (50, 51), but school-30 percent overall and 48 percent of non-Hispanic white early competent care can promote healthier pregnancies by detecting women (tabular data not shown). and managing preexisting medical conditions, providing health behavior Bables bom to mothers who smoke during pregnancy are at advice, and assessing the risk of poor pregnancy outcome (52). Pre- greatly elevated risk of low birthweight (LBW), a finding documented natal care can also be vital to maternal health and can serve as a In birth certificate data as well as in numerous other studies (40, 44, gateway into the health care system, especially for socially disadvan- 45). In 1997, 12.1 percent of infants born to smokers weighed less than taged women (51). 2,500 grams (5 lb 8 oz) compared with 7.1 percent of births to non- According to the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index smokers (table 32). This substantial differential is found for every race (APNCU), an alternative measure of prenatal care utilization (53), the and Hispanic origin group. The LBW risk is heightened as the number of cigarettes increases, although LBW is elevated even among babies Table D. First trimester prenatal care by race and born to the lightest smokers (one to five cigarettes daily), 10.9 percent Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1970, 1975, (tabular data not shown). Advancing maternal age exacerbates the risk, 1980, 1985, 1990-97 probably a consequence of the much greater cigarette consumption among older women (table 29). Non-Hlspanic All Year races' White Black Hispanic² Alcohol use during pregnancy 1997 82.5 67.9 72.3 73.7 Pregnancy and birth outcome can be jeopardized by maternal 1996 81.9 87.4 71.5 72.2 1985 alcohol use during pregnancy. Even low-to-moderate alcohol use has 81.3 87.1 70.4 70.8 1994 80.2 86,5 68.3 68.9 been shown to compromise birth outcome, independent of other risk 1993 78.9 85.6 66.1 66.6 factors such as tobacco use and other matemal risk factors (46, 47). 1992 77.7 84.9 64.0 64.2 1991 All States except California and South Dakota Included items on 76.2 83.7 61.9 61.0 1990 75.8 83.3 60.7 60.2 alcohol use on their birth certificates in 1997. This reporting area 1989 75.5 82.7 59.9 59.5 accounted for 86 percent of U.S. births. 1985 76.2 1980 Alcohol use during pregnancy is substantially underreported on the 76.3 1975 724 birth certificate (31). According to birth certificate data, alcohol use 1970 68.0 declined again in 1997 to just 1.2 percent of mothers reporting any alcohol use compared with 1.4 percent in 1996 and 4.1 percent in 1989, Data not available. 'Includes races other than white and black and origin not stated. the first year this Information was reported on the birth certificates (see 2ncludes al persons of Hispanic origin of any rece. 04/27/99 22:21 FAX 022 12 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 in prenatal care use for 1996-97 occurred among mothers with 95 intensive use of care (women for whom the number of visits exceeded Cuban the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommen- Japanese dations by a ratio of observed-to-expected visits of at least 110 percent). 85 White (non-Hlspanic) (See table E.) Based on the APNCU, intensive use of prenatal care has Chinese risen 67 percent from 18.4 to 30.7 percent since 1981 (the first year comparable data on period of gestation used to compute this index became available), adequate care (not including intensive use of care) Percent 75 Fillpino Puerto Rican has declined 4 percent (from 45.1 to 43.5 percent), and less than adequate care has declined 29 percent (from 36.5 to 25.9 percent) (54). Hawalian Gains in the proportion of mothers with care beginning In the first American Indian trimester of pregnancy were observed for the current year among most 65 race and ethnic groups (levels for Japanese and Hawaiian mothers Black did not rise for 1997). Improvement continues to be most pronounced among those with less favorable levels of care, somewhat reducing the Mexican considerable disparity among groups (figure 5). Since 1989 first tri- 55 mester care has risen by more than 20 percent among Mexican (from 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 56.7 to 72.1 percent), Central and South American (from 60.8 to NOTE: Percents are platted on a log soale, 76.9 percent). Puerto Rican (from 62.7 to 76.5 percent), and non- Hispanic black mothers (from 59.9 to 72,3 percent); and by less than Figure 5. Percent of mothers with first trimester prenatal 10 percent among Cuban (83.2 to 90.4 percent), Japanese (86.2 to care by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1989-97 89.3 percent), and non-Hispanic white mothers (82.7 to 87.9 percent). (See tables 24 and 25 for 1997 data.) Most States reported higher levels of first trimester care for 1997 compared with 1996. Four New England States reported the highest Complications of labor and/or delivery proportions of mothers with first trimester care (89-90 percent), and the Of the 15 reported complications of labor and/or delivery, 3 were lowest proportions of mothers with late or no care (less than 2 percent) reported at a rate greater than or equal to 30 per 1,000 live births in for 1997: Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island 1997: Meconium, moderate/heavy (56 per 1,000). fetal distress (40 (table 34). per 1,000), and breech/malpresentation (38 per 1,000) (table 37). Rates for these three complications varied by race and Hispanic origin (tables 27 and 28). It has been shown that levels of these complica- Obstetric procedures tions may be underreported on the birth certificate (55). Six specific obstetric procedures are reported on the birth certificate. It has been shown that these procedures may be under- Attendant at birth and place of delivery reported on the birth certificate (31, 55). The most prevalent obstetric procedure in 1997 was electronic fetal monitoring, reported for over More than 9 out of 10 births in 1997 (92.3 percent) were 3.2 million births, or 83 percent of all live births (table 36). attended by a physician In a hospital, making this arrangement by far According to data from the birth certificate, 64 percent of mothers the most typical (table 38). However, the percent of births attended by who had live births in 1997 received ultrasound. The overall rates of a physician in a hospital was slightly lower in 1997 than in 1996 stimulation of labor and induction of labor in 1997 were 174 and 184, (92.9 percent) and has declined from 98.4 percent in 1975. For respectively, per 1,000 live births. The rates of both of these procedures physician-attended births, 4 percent were by doctors of osteopathy have been rising annually since 1989 (56). (DO's) while the remaining were attended by doctors of medicine (MD's). Although small, the number and percent of births attended by DO's has grown steadily since 1989, the first year data on DO's were available from the birth certificate. The percent of births attended by midwives increased sharply between 1975 (1.0 percent) and 1997 Table E. Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index: (7.0 percent). About 95 percent of midwife-attended births in 1997 United States, 1981, 1985, 1990, and 1995-97 were by certified nurse midwives (CNM's). Intensive About 99 percent of births in 1997 were delivered in hospitals, Year Use Adequate Intermediate Inadequate No care almost unchanged from the 1975 level. The majority of out-of-hospital 1997 30.7 43.5 16.3 8.4 1.2 births were in a residence (64 percent) while 28 percent were in a 1996 29.3 43.8 17.1 8.7 1.1 freestanding birthing center. 1995' 28.8 43.9 17.2 8.9 1.2 1990' About 93 percent of births to non-Hispanic white women were 24.6 42.6 19.1 11.8 1.9 1985' 21.1 44.8 21.0 11.8 1.5 attended by a physician in a hospital compared with about 92 percent 1981 18.4 45.1 23.2 12.0 1.3 of births to non-Hispanic black women and 90 percent of births to Hispanic women. Hispanic women were more likely to have midwife- 'See reference 54 for detailed data on trenda. attended hospital births (9 percent) than were either non-Hispanic black NOTE: See reference 53 for information on calculation of this measure. women (7 percent) or non-Hispanic white women (6 percent). 04/27/99 22:22 FAX 023 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 13 Method of delivery There was considerable variation In cesarean rates by State The rate of cesarean delivery increased slightly between 1996 ranging from a high of 26.7 per 100 live births in Mississippi to a low and 1997 (from 20.7 per 100 live births to 20.8) after falling each year of 15.3 in Colorado (table 41). The rate for Puerto Rico was 33.4. There during 1989-96 (table F and table 39). The 1997 rate was 9 percent was also considerable variation in VBAC rates by State. Data for Hawaii lower than the rate of 22.8 in 1989, the first year this Information was (table 41) and for Hawaiian births (table 24) are unreliable because of available on the birth certificate. The primary cesarean rate (first incomplete reporting. All of the selected medical risk factors in table 42 were associated cesareans per 100 live births to women who had no previous cesarean) was unchanged between 1996 and 1997, at 14.6, after with overall cesarean rates that were higher than the national average. falling each year during 1989-96. The primary rate in 1997 was Cesarean rates for the medical risk factors ranged from 21.7 per 100 9 percent lower than in 1989 (16.1). Concomitant with the decline in Ilve births for mothers with Rh sensitization to 48.0 for mothers with cesarean rates during the 1969-96 period was a 50-percent increase eclampsia. Certain complications of labor and/or delivery are also in the rate of vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery associated with high cesarean rates. Nearly all births with cephalopelvic (VBAC)-from 18.9 In 1969 to 28.3 in 1996. However, in 1997 the rate disproportion were cesarean deliveries (96.2), and the cesarean rates dropped to 27.4. a 3-percent decline from 1996. for breech/malpresentation (84.5) and placenta previa (82.0) were also Overall cesarean rates increased steadily by age of the mother and very high. were more than twice as high for mothers 40-54 years of age (32.4) During the 1989-97 period, the percent of births that were deliv- as for teenagers (14.3) (table 40). Primary cesarean rates Increased ered by elther forceps or vacuum extraction remained steady at about with additional age after ages 20-24 years, to 22.6 for women 40-54 9 percent. During that period, however, there was a shift as the number years of age. VBAC rates declined with increasing age-a third of and percent of births delivered by forceps declined each year, whereas teenagers who had a previous cesarean had a VBAC delivery (33.4 per- the use of vacuum extraction consistently increased. In 1997, 2.8 per- cent) compared with 20.5 percent of mothers 40-54 years of age. cent of births were delivered by forceps compared with 5.5 percent in Total and primary cesarean rates declined or held steady in 1997 1989-a 49-percent decline. Vacuum extraction was used In 6.2 percent compared with 1996 for all age groups under 30 years but increased of births in 1997, a 77-percent increase compared with 1989 (3.5 between the 2 years for mothers in age groups of 30 years of age and percent). over. All age groups experienced declines in VBAC rates between 1996 and 1997. Non-Hispanic black women had a higher cesarean rate in Infant health characteristics 1997 (21.8 per 100 live births) than either non-Hispanic white women (20.9) or Hispanic women (20.2). Similarly, the primary cesarean rate Period of gestation for non-Hispanic black women (15.6) was higher than the rate for non-Hispanic white women (14.8) and Hispanic women (13.4). The The preterm birth rate rose sharply for 1996-97, from 11.0 to VBAC rate in 1997 was highest for non-Hispanic white women (28.5), 11.4 percent. The proportion of preterm births (infants born prior to 37 lowest for Hispanic women (23.5), and intermediate for non-Hlspanic completed weeks of gestation) has risen 8 percent since 1990 (from 10.6 percent) and more than 20 percent since 1981 (from 9.4 per- black women (26.4). Japanese, American Indian, Hawaiian, and Chinese mothers had cent). The current year rise included increases In both very preterm lower cesarean rates (ranging from 15.1 to 19.1 per 100 live births) than births (prior to 32 completed weeks of gestation) and moderately Puerto Rican, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Fillpino, or preterm (32-36 weeks) births. (See tables 43 and 44.) Preterm birth Cuban mothers (ranging from 20.8 to 30.5) (tables 24 and 25). is a major cause of infant mortality and has been associated with long-term neurodevelopmental and respiratory disorders (57, 58). The primary measure used to determine the inlant's gestational age, the interval between the first day of the last normal menstrual Table F. Total and primary cesarean rates and vaginal period (LMP) and the date of birth, is subject lo error for several reasons birth after previous cesarean delivery rates: including imperfect maternal recall or misidentification of the LMP United States, 1989-97 because of postconception bleeding, delayed ovulation, or intervening early miscarriage (59). See Technical notes for additional information Cesarean rate VBAC on procedures for measuring gestational age. Year Total' Primary2 rates The increase In preterm births was most pronounced among 1997 20.8 14.6 27.4 non-Hispanic white women, for whom a rise of 4 percent (from 9.5 1996, 20.7 14.6 28,3 to 9.9 percent) was observed. The percent of births bom very preterm 1995. 20.8 14.7 27.5 was 1.49 for 1997 compared with 1.43 for 1996. Since 1989, the preterm 1994 21.2 14.9 26.3 1993, 21.8 15.3 24.3 rate among non-Hispanic white births has risen from 8.4 percent, and 1992. 22.3 15.6 22.6 the very preterm rate from 1.34 percent. Recent increases in multiple 1991 22.6 15.9 21.3 births, which are disproportionately preterm, have particularly influenced 1990 22.7 16.0 19.9 1989 22.8 16.1 18.9 the upward trend in preterm birth for this group. Analysis of only non-Hispanic white singleton births for 1989-97 reveals a 14 percent Percent of all live births by cesarean delivery. increase in moderately preterm births (compared with a 19-percent rise 2Number of primary ceaareans per 100 live births to women who have not had a previous cesarean. for all births) and essentially no change in the proportion of very preterm Number of vaginal births after previous cesarean (VBAC) delivery per 100 live births to women births (compared with a rise from 1,34 to 1.49 percent for all births) with a provious cosarean delivery. (figure 6) (60). 04/27/99 22:22 FAX 024 14 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47. No. 18, April 29, 1999 20 Black (non-Hispanic), Total 20 18 18 16 Black (non-Hispanic), Singlatons 16 14 14 Percent Black LBW 12 White (non-Hispanic), Total 12 10 10 8 White (non-Hispanic), Singletons Percent 8 6 Total LBW 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 Year 6 NOTE: Preterm is <37 completed weeks of gestation. Parcents are plotted on a log scale, White LBW Flgure 6. Rate of preterm birth by plurality and 4 race/Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1989-97 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1997 The risk of preterm birth increased slightly among non-Hispanic NOTE: Low birthweight (LBW) is less than 2,800 grams. Percents are plotted on a log scale. black births for 1997 (17.6 percent) compared with 1996 (17.5 per- cent), checking the downturn observed since 1993 (18.6 percent). The Flgure 7. Percent low birthweight by race: United States, very preterm birth rate was largely unchanged at 4.19 percent, but has 1970-97 declined from 4.68 percent since 1989. Among non-Hispanic black singleton births, however, levels of moderately and very preterm births were unchanged from the previous year (data not shown). a slower pace: from 4.90 to 4.95 percent for 1996-97, and from Preterm births also increased among Hispanic women, rising from 4.60 percent since 1989 (see table G). 10.9 to 11.2 percent for 1996-97; the increase was concentrated among LBW among non-Hispanic black Infants was unchanged for 1997 moderately preterm births (9.2-9.5 percent). The overall preterm rate at 13.1 percent. LBW has declined somewhat among black births during has changed only slightly since 1989 (from 11.1 percent), and the very the 1990's (from 13.6 for 1991), but the rate of VLBW has not improved; preterm rate has dipped from 1.76 to 1.68 percent. (Relative trends in for 1997 the percent VLBW was 3.05, compared with the 1989 level of preterm rates for Hispanic births are largely unaffected by trends in 2.97. Increases in multiple births have only moderately influenced trends multiple births.) Preterm rates were up for most of the Hispanic sub- in non-Hispanic black LBW; that is, the decline in LBW since 1993 is groups between 1996 and 1997 (tables 24 and 25). slightly steeper when only singletons are examined. Overall Hispanic LBW was 6.4 percent in 1997 compared with Birthweight 6.3 percent for the previous year. The percent VLBW among Hispanic The rate of low birthweight (LBW) (less than 2,500 grams) rose births was essentially unchanged at 1.13 percent. Since 1989, when to 7.5 percent for 1997, from 7.4 percent for 1996, the highest level national data on Hispanic births first became available, Hispanic VLBW reported since 1973. Low birthweight has risen slowly over the last and LBW have shown a moderately upward trend (from 1.05 and decade (from 6.8 percent for 1986) after declining during the 1970's 6.2 percent). LBW rates were up slightly for each Hispanic subgroup for and early 1980's. (See tables 43-47 and figure 7.) The rise in multiple births, which are much more likely than singletons to be LBW, Table G. Percent low birthweight among singletons by has influenced this upward trend; whereas overall LBW has risen race/Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1989-97 10 percent since 1986, LBW among singleton births has increased Non-Hispanic Non-Hlspanic 4 percent (from 5.84 to 6.08 percent). Year Total While Black Hispanic The percent of very low birthweight (VLBW) (less than1 1997 grams) was 1.42 percent for 1997, compared with 1.37 for 1996. This 6.08 4.95 11.46 5.43 1996 6.03 4.90 11.55 5.34 level has also risen in recent years (from 1.15 percent in 1980). LBW 1995 6.05 4.67 11.66 5.36 infants, particularly VLBW infants, are at greater risk than heavier babies 1994 6.06 4.79 11.79 5.37 of long-term morbidity and early death (60). In 1996, VLBW infants 1993 6.05 4.70 11.90 5.34 1992 5.93 4.59 11.91 5.22 accounted for about 1 percent of all births, but 50 percent of all infant 1991' 5.99 4.61 12.15 5.29 deaths (infant deaths through 11 months per 1,000 live births) (58). 19902 5.90 4.56 11.92 5.23 1989 The proportion of non-Hispanic white LBW infants rose from 6.4 6.00 4.60 12.22 5.35 to 6,5 percent between 1996 and 1997. Since 1989 non-Hispanic white Excludes data for Now Hampshire, which did not require reporting of Hispanic origin of mother. LBW has risen 16 percent (from 5.6 percent) and VLBW has increased Excludes dala for New Hampshire and Oklahoma which ald not require reporting of Hispanic from 0.93 to 1.12 percent. The sharp increase in the multiple birth rate origin of mother. Excludes dala for Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma which did not require reporting of explains some, but not all of the rise for non-Hispanic white births as Hispanic origin of mother. LBW among singleton births has also risen over this period, but at NOTE: Low birthweight is less than 2,500 grams or 5 lb B OZ. 04/27/99 22:22 FAX 025 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 15 1997, and ranged from 6.0 percent for Mexican to 9.4 percent for Puerto These areas included 99 percent of births in the United States. It has Rican infants. (See table 25.) been shown that these anomalies are underreported on the birth For 1997, 6.8 percent of American Indian births were LBW. certificate (55, 62). Among the Asian or Pacific Islander subgroups, LBW levels were Because many of the congenital anomalies tracked on birth cer- generally up for the current year, and ranged from 5.1 for Chinese to tificates occur Infrequently, the rates shown in this report are calculated 8.3 percent for Filipino births (table 24). per 100,000 live births (table 49). Caution should be used in comparing The percent macrosomia (birthweight of at least 4,000 grams) was yearly rates for a specific anomaly as a small change in the number 10.1, down slightly from the figure reported for 1996 (10.2 percent). of anomalles reported can result in a relatively large change in rates. Macrosomic births have been declining since 1991, after peaking at about 11 percent in the 1980's. Multiple births The median birthweight for all births for 1997 was 3,350 grams (7 lbs, 7 oz.) unchanged from 1996. The median for white births was The number of births In multiple deliverles climbed to 110,874 3,390 grams, and for black births 3,180 grams. for 1997 and included 104,137 twins, 6,148 triplets, 510 quadruplets, LBW and VLBW risk varies by State; among non-Hispanic white and 79 quintuplets and other higher order multiple births, representing births for 1997, LBW levels ranged from a low of 5.1 percent in Hawaii a 3-percent increase in the number of twins, and a 16-percent jump in to a high of 9.0 percent for Wyoming. Among States with at least 1,000 the number of triplet births over 1996. (See table 50 for 1997 data.) births to non-Hispanic black mothers, the proportion of LBW for this Slightly fewer births were reported In quadruplet and quintuplet and population ranged from 10.2 percent in lowa and Washington to other higher order multiple deliveries for 1997 (table H). Since 1980 16.2 percent for the District of Columbia (table 46). the number of twins has risen 52 percent (from 68,339) and the number of triplets and other higher order multiple births by 404 per- cent (from 1,337) (63, 64). Apgar score The twin birth rate (the number of twin births per 1,000 live births) The Apgar score was developed by the late Virginia Apgar, M.D., rose 3 percent for 1996-97, to 26.8 (or 2.7 percent of all births). Since as a means of evaluating the physical condition of newborns shortly 1980 the twinning rate has risen 42 percent (from 18.9 per 1,000). After after delivery (61). The score considers five characteristics of the baby a rise of 20 percent for 1995-96, the higher order multiple birth rate that are easily identifiable-heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, (the number of triplet, quadruplet and quintuplet, and other higher order reflex irritability, and color. Each of these characteristics is assessed multiples per 100,000 live births). jumped another 14 percent for 1997, and assigned a value of 0-2 with 2 being optimum. The total score is to 173.6 per 100,000. The higher order multiple birth rate has more than the sum of the five components and a score of 7 or better indicates doubled since 1991 (from 81.4), and quadrupled since 1980 (from 37.0) that the baby is in good-to-excellent physical condition. The 5-minute (figure 8). Put another way, one in every 576 births was a triplet or other Apgar score is based on an assessment 5 minutes after delivery and higher order multiple in 1997, compared with about one of every 2,700 used to predict the newbom's chance of survival. births in 1980. Older matemal age (women in their thirties are more likely In 1997 all States except California and Texas collected information to have a multiple birth than those in their twentles, even without the on the 5-minute Apgar score. Births to residents in these States use of fertility therapy), and the more widespread use of fertility- accounted for 78 percent of all births in the United States. Only 1.4 per- enhancing therapies (fertility drugs and techniques such as in vitro cent of babies had Apgar scores that were considered low (less than fertilization), have been associated with the unprecedented rise in 7) at 5 minutes after birth, unchanged since 1993 (tables 24 and 25). multiple births (64-66). Of all racial groups, Asian or Pacific Islander babies were in the Twinning rates rose among the three largest racial and ethnic best physical condition shortly after delivery-only 1 percent had scores groups for 1996-97, but continue to be highest for non-Hispanic black less than 7. The percent of babies with low scores was intermediate women (30.0 compared with 28.8 for non-Hispanic white, and 19.5 for for non-Hispanic white and Hispanic women (1.2 each) while 2.5 per- Hispanic women). In contrast, and despite substantial increases in cent of non-Hispanic black babies had low 5-minute scores. higher order multiple births among non-Hispanic black women Table H. Numbers of twin, tripiet, quadruplet and Abnormal conditions of the newborn quintuplet, and other higher order multiple births: Of the eight specific abnormal conditions reported on the birth United States, 1989-97 certificate, the rates per 1,000 live births in 1997 were highest for Quintuplete assisted ventilation less than 30 minutes (22 per 1,000), assisted and other ventilation 30 minutes or longer (9 per 1,000), and hyaline membrane higher order Year Twins Triplets Quadruplets multiples disease/respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (6 per 1,000) (table 48). It has been shown that these conditions may be underreported on the 1997 104,137 6,148 510 79 1996 100,750 5,298 560 81 birth certificate (55). 1995 96,736 4,551 365 57 1994. 97,064 4,233 315 46 1993 96,445 3,834 277 57 Congenital anomalies 1992 95,372 9,547 310 26 1991 94,779 3,121 203 22 In 1997 congenital anomalies were reported on the birth certifi- 1990 93,865 2,830 185 13 1989 90,118 2,529 cates of the District of Columbia and all States except New Mexico. 229 40 04/27/99 22:22 FAX 026 16 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1 6. Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Curtin SC. Declines in teenage birth rales, 250 White (non-Hispanic) 1991-97: National and State patterns. National vital statistics reports; vol 47 no 12. Hyaltsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Per 100,000 live births Statistics. 1998. 100 All races 7. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Plccinino LJ. Fertility, family planning. and women's health: New data from the 1995 National White, total Black, total Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Stalistics. Vital 50 Hispanic Health Stat 23(19). 1997. B. Piccinino W, Mosher WD. Trends In contraceptive use in the United 25 1980 1985 States: 1982-1995. Fam Plann Persp 30(1):4-10, 46. 1998. 1990 1995 1997 9. Ventura SJ, Curtin SC. Recent trends in teen births in the United Year States. Stat Bulletin 80(1):2-12 1999, NOTES: Higher order multiples include births In greater than twin deliveries. Rates are 10. Ventura SJ, Taffel SM, Mosher WD, Wilson JB, Henshaw S. Trends in plotted on a log scale. pregnancies and pregnancy rates: Estimates for the United States, Figure 8. Higher order multiple birth rates by race and 1980-92. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 43 no 11, supp. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1995. Hispanic origin of mother, 1980-97 11. Henshaw SK. U.S. Teanage pregnancy statistics. New York, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute. 1998. 12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Abortion surveillance: (64 percent) and Hispanic women (93 percent) since 1991, non- Prefiminary analysis-United Stales, 1996. MMWR 47(47):1025-28, Hispanic white women were more than twice as likely as non-Hispanic 1035. 1998. black women, and more than three times as likely as Hispanic women 13. Hollmann FW, Kuzmeskus LB, Perkins RC, Weber EA. U.S. population to have a triplet, quadruplet, or quintuplet birth (230.8 compared with estimates, by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1990 to 1997. 90.0 and 72.7 per 100,000, respectively) in 1997. Non- Hispanic white PPL-91R. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Rounded populations consistent with U.S. Bureau of the Census file NESTV97. 1998. mothers tend to be older, and are more likely than their black and 14. Ventura SJ. Trends and variations in first births to older women, Hispanic counterparts, to seek infertility services (16). 1970-86. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 21(47). Multiple birth rates generally rise with increasing maternal age 1989. (there is a slight dip at age 40-44 years), with rates peaking for older 15. Bachu A. Fertility of American women: June 1992. Current population mothers 45 to 54 years of age. For 1997, 16.6 percent of births to reports; series P-20-470. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce. mothers aged 45 years and over was a multiple, a level 10 times higher 1993. than that for mothers under 20 years of age (1.5 percent) and more than 16. Chandra A, Stephen EH. Impaired fecundity in the United States: 3 times higher than that for women in their thirties (3.9 percent). 1982-1995. Fam Plann Persp 30(1):34-42. 1998. Multiple births are more likely than singletons to be bom preterm 17. Clarke SC, Ventura SJ. Birth and fertility rates for States: United States, (57 versus 10 percent) or LBW (56 versus 6 percent). Multiples com- 1990. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 21(52). prised only 3 percent of all births in 1997, but 21 percent of all LBW 1994. infants, 24 percent of VLBW, 14 percent of preterm, and 20 percent of 18. Taffel SM. Birth and fertility rates for States: United States, 1980. very preterm infants. The rising multiple birth rate and the accompanying National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 21(42). 1984. high risk for these births has increasingly influenced measures of 19. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of final natality perinatal health at the national and State level (60, 67). Thus, it can be stalistics, 1996. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 46 no 11, supp. important when analyzing trends in these measures, to do so by plurality Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. (see gestation and birthweight sections). 20. Rosenberg HM. Seasonal variation of births: United States, 1933-63. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 21(9). 1966. 21. Office of Vital Statistics and Epidemiology. Summary of Vital Statistics References 1997-The City of New York. New York, New York: New York City Department of Health. 1998. 22. Berenson L, Office of Vital Statistics and Epidemiology. New York City 1. Ventura SJ, Anderson RN, Martin JA, Smith BL. Births and deaths: Department of Health. Personal communication. February 1999. Preliminary data for 1997. National vilal stallstics reports; vol 47 no 4. 23. Ventura SJ, Births to unmarried mothers: United Slates, 1980-92. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stal 21(53). 1995. 2. National Center for Health Statistics. Natality public-use tape and 24. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Educational attainment in the United CD-ROM. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Annual products. States: March 1998 (Update). Delailed lables and documentation for P20-513. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1998. 3. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United Stales, Vol I, natality. Hyatisville, Maryland. Annual issues, 1980-92. Issue for 25. Chomitz VR, Cheung LWY, Lieberman E. The role of lifestyle in 1993 in press. preventing low birth weight. In: The Future of Children: Low Birthweight. Vol 5(1):121-38. Los Altos, California: Center for the Future of Children, 4. Martin JA, Birth characteristics for Asian of Pacific Islander subgroups, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation. 1995. 1992. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 43 no 10, supp. Hyattsville, 26. Institute of Medicine. Subcommittee on Nutritional Status and Weight Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1995. Gain During Pregnancy. Nutrition during pregnancy. National Academy 5. Mathews TJ, Ventura SJ, Curtin SC, Martin JA, Births of Hispanic origin, of Sciences. Washington: National Academy Press. 1990. 1989-95. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 46, no 6, supp. Hyattsville, 27. Abrams B, Selvin S. Maternal weight gain pattern and birth weight. Am Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1998. J Obstet Gynecol. 86(2):163-9. 1995. 04/27/99 22:23 FAX 027 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 17 28. Velentgas P, Benga-De E, Williams MA. Chronic hypertension, 49. Lewis CT, Mathews TJ, Heuser RL Prenatal care in the United States, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and low birthweight. Epidemiology 1980-94. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 21(54). 5(3):345-48. 1993. 1996. 29. Cunningham FG, Lindheimer MD. Hypertension in pregnancy. NEJM 50. Huntington J, Connell FA. For every dollar spent-the cost-savings 326(14):927-32 1992. argument for prenatal care. NEJM, 33(19):1303-7. 1994. 30. DeBaun-M, Rowley D, Province M, et al. Selected antepartum medical 51. Fiscella K. Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical complications and very-low-birthweight infants among black and white review. Obstet Gynecol 85(3):46-79. 1995. women. Am J Public Health 84(9): 1495-7. 1994. 52. U.S. Public Health Service. Caring for our future: The content of 31. Buescher PA, Taylor KP, Davis MH, Bowling JM. The quality of the new prenatal care. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human birth certificate data: A validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Services. 1989. Health 83(8):1163-65. 1993. 53. Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care 32. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance report of new data from index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J the 1989 birth certificate. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 40 no 12, Public Health 84(9):1414-20. 1994. supp. Hyattsville, Maryland: Public Health Service. 1992. 54. Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, el al. The changing pattern of 33. Dietz PM, Adams MM, Kendrick JS, Mathis MP. The PRAMS Working prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, using different Group. Completeness of ascertainment of prenatal smoking using birth prenatal care indices. JAMA 279(20):1623-28. 1998. certificates and confidential questionnaires: Variations by maternal 55. Piper JM, Mitchel EF, Snowden M, et al. Validation of 1989 Tennessee attributes and infant birth weight Am J Epidemiol 148(11):1048-54. birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J 1998. Epidemiol 137(7):758-68. 1993. 34. Kharraz) M, Epstein D, Hopkins B, et al. Evaluation of four smoking 56. Mathews TJ. Trends in stimulation and induction of labor, 1989-1995. questions. Pub Health Rep 114(1):60-70. 1999. Stat Bulletin 78(4):20-6. 1998. 35. Mathews TJ. Smoking during pregnancy, 1990-96. National vital 57. Berkowitz GS, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemio- statistics reports: vol 47 по 10. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center logic Reviews; vol 15(2):414-43. 1993. for Health Statistics. 1998. 58. MacDorman MF, Atkinson JO. Infant mortality statistics from the linked 36. Ventura SJ. Commentary: Using the birth certificate to monitor smoking birth/infant death data sel-1996 period data. Monthly vital statistics during pregnancy. Pub Health Rep 114(1):71-73. 1999. report; vol 46 no 12, supp. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for 37. Chandra A. Health aspects of pregnancy and childbirth: United States, Health Statistics. 1998. 1982-88. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 23(18). 59. Alexander GR Allen MC. Conceptualization, measurement. and use of 1995. gestational age. I. Clinical and Public Health Practice. J Perinatal 38. National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Pregnancy and Health 16(1):53-9. 1996. Survey-Drug Use Among Women Delivering Live Births: 1992. 60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preterm singleton births: National Institutes of Health. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of United States, 1989-1996. MMWR 48(9):185-9. 1999. Health and Human Services. 1996. 61. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn 39. Vega WA, Kolody B, Hwang J, Noble A. Prevalence and magnitude of infant. Current Researches in Anesthesia and Analgesia 260-67. perinatal substance exposures in California. NEJM 329(12):850-4. July-Aug. 1953. 1993. 62. Watkins ML, Edmonds L, McCleam A, et al. The surveillance of birth defects: The usefulness of the revised U.S. standard birth certificate. 40. Kleinman JC, Madans JH. The effects of maternal smoking, physical stature, and educational attainment on the incidence of low birth weight. Am J Public Health 86(5):731-734. 1996. Am J Epidemiol 121(6):843-55. 1985. 63. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-specific variation in rates of twin births -United States. 1992-1994. MMWR 46(6):121-25. 41. Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL Relationship of sudden infant death syndrome 1997. to maternal smoking during and after pregnancy. Pediatrics 90(6):905-8. 1992. 64. Martin JA, MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Triplet births: Trends and outcomes, 1971-94. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health 42. Cunningham J. Dockery DW, Speizer FE. Maternal smoking during Stat 21(55). 1997. pregnancy as a predictor of lung function in children. Am J Epidemiol 65. Kiely JL, Kleinman JC, Klely M. Triplets and higher-order multiple births: 139(72)-1139-52. 1994. Time trends and infant mortality. AJDC 146:862-8. 1992. 43. Ventura SJ, Taffel SM. Childbearing characteristics of U.S.- and 66. Wilcox LS, Kiely JL Melvin CL, Martin MC. Assisted reproductive foreign-bom Hispanic mothers. Pub Health Rep 100(6):647-52. 1985. technologies: Estimates of their contribution to multiple births and 44. Floyd RL, Zahniser SC, Gunter EP, Kendrick JS. Smoking during newbom hospital days in the United States. Fertility and Sterility pregnancy: Prevalence, effects, and intervention strategies. Birth 65(2):361-66. 1996. 18(1):48-53. 1991. 67. Martin JA, Taffel SM. Current and future impact of rising multiple birth 45. Fox SH, Koepsell TO, Daling JR. Birth weight and smoking during ratios on low birthweight. Stat Bulletin 76(2):10-18. 1995. pregnancy-Effect modification by maternal age. Am J Epidemiol 68. Ventura SJ. Martin JA. Taffel SM. et al. Advance report of final natality 139(10):1008-15. 1994. statistics, 1992. Monthly vital statistics report: vol 43 no 5, supp. 46. Sampson PD, Bookstein FL, Barr HM. Steissguth AP. Prenatal alcohol Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. exposure. birthweight, and measures of child size from birth to 14 69. Berkov B. An evaluation of California's inferred birth statistics for years. Am J Public Health 84(9):1421-28. 1994. unmarried women. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health 47. Roeleveld N, Vingerhoets E, Zielhuis GA, Gabreels F. Mental retarda- Stat 2(97). 1985. tion associated with parental smoking and alcohol consumption before, 70. National Center for Health Statistics. Computer edits for natality data, during. and after pregnancy. Prev Medicine 21:110-19. 1992. effective 1993. Instruction manual, part 12. Hyattsville, Maryland: 48. Ebrahim SH, Luman ET, Floyd RL, et al. Alcohol consumption by National Center for Health Statistics. 1995. pregnant women in the United States during 1988-1995. Obstet 71. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin Gynecol 92(2):187-92. 1998. information from the 1990 census: A comparison of census results with 04/27/99 22:23 FAX 1 028 18 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 results where age and race have been modified. 1990 CPH-L-74. 13. Total number of births, rates, and percent of births with selected Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. 1991. demographic characteristics. by specified race of mother and 72 U.S. Bureau of the Census. Estimates of the population of states by place of birth of mother: United States, 1997 38 age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1990 to 1997. STRES97. Product 14. Total number of births, rates, and percent of births with selected Announcement CB98-122. Released July 21, 1998. demographic characteristics, by Hispanic origin of mother and by 73. Lugaila TA. Marital status and living arrangements: March 1997 race for mothers of non-Hispanic origin and by place of birth of (Update). U. S. Bureau of the Census. Current population reports mother: United States, 1997 39 P20-506. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce. 1998. 15. Live births by race of mother and observed and seasonally 74. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Population estimates for 1997 based on adjusted birth and fertility rales. by month: United States, unpublished tabulations prepared by the Housing and Household 1997 40 Economic Statistics Division. 1998. 16. Live births by day of week and index of occurrence by method of 75. Brockert JE, Stockbauer JW, Senner JW, et al. Recommended standard delivery, day of week, and race of mother: United States, medical definitions for the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth, 1989 1997 41 revision. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for 17. Number, rate, and percent of births to unmarried women by age, Vital Records and Health Statistics. Traverse City, Michigan. June race, and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 42 25-27, 1990. 18. Birth rates for unmarried women by age of mother. United 76. Mathews TJ, Ventura SJ. Birth and fertility rates by educational States, 1970, 1975, and 1980-97, and by age, race, and attainment: United States, 1994. Monthly vital statistics report, vol 45 no Hispanic origin of mother. United States, 1980-97 43 10, supp. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 19. Number and percent of births to unmarried women by race and 1997. Hispanic origin of mother. United States and each State, Puerto 77. Taffel SM. Cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990. National Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, 1997 45 Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 21(51). 1994. 20. Birth rates by age and race of father: United States, 78. Curtin SC. Rates of cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous 1980-97 46 cesarean, 1991-95. Monthly vital statistics report; vol 45 no 11, supp 3. 21. Live births by educational attainment, and percent of mothers Hyattsville. Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1997. completing 12 years or more and 16 years or more of school. by age and race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 47 List of tables 22. Number of live births and percent distribution by weight gain of mother during pregnancy and median weight gain, according to 1. Live births, birth rates, and fertility rates, by race: United States, period of gestation, race and Hispanic origin of mother: Total of specified years 1940-55 and each year. 1960-97 22 49 reporting States and the District of Columbia, 1997 49 2 Live births by age of mother, live-birth order, and race of mother: 23. Percent low birthweight by weight gain of mother during preg- United States, 1997 23 папсу, period of gestation, and race and Hispanic origin of 3. Fertility rates and birth rales by age of mother, live-birth order, mother. Total of 49 reporting States and the District of Columbia, and race of mother: United States, 1997 24 1997 50 4. Total fertility rates and birth rates by age of mother: United 24. Percent of births with selected medical or health characteristics, States, 1970-97, and by age and race of mother: United States, by specified race of mother, by place of birth of mother: United 1980-97 25 States, 1997 51 5. Fertility rates and birth rates by live-birth order and race of 25. Percent of births with selected medical or health characteristics, mother: United States, 1980-97 27 by Hispanic origin of mother and by race for mothers of 6. Live births, birth rates, and fertility rates by Hispanic origin of non-Hispanic origin and by place of birth of mother: United mother and by race for mothers of non-Hispanic origin: United States, 1997 52 States, 1989-97 28 26. Live births to mothers with selected medical risk factors and 7. Live births by age of mother. live-binh order, Hispanic origin of rates by age of mother, by race of mother: United States, mother, and by race for mothers of non-Hispanic origin: United 1997 53 States, 1997 29 27. Number and rate of live births to mothers with selected medical B. Fertility rates and birth rates by age of mother, live-birth order, risk factors, complications of labor, and obstetric procedures. by Hispanic origin of mother. and by race for mothers of non- specified race of mother: United States, 1997 54 Hispanic origin: United States, 1997 31 28. Number and rate of live births to mothers with selected medical 9. Total fertility rates, fertility rates, and birth rates by age and risk factors, complications of labor, and obstetric procedures, by Hispanic origin of mother and by race for mothers of non- Hispanic origin of mother and by race for mothers of non- Hispanic origin: United States, 1989-97 33 Hispanic origin: United States, 1997 55 10. Number of births, birth rates, fertility rates, total fertility rates, and 29. Number of live births by smoking status of mother. percent birth rates for teenagers 15-19 years by age of mother: United smokers, and percent distribution by average number of ciga- States and each State. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and rettes smoked by mothers per day, according to age and race of American Samoa, 1997 35 mother. Total of 46 reporting States, the District of Columbia, 11. Live births by race of mother: United States and each State, and New York City, 1997 56 Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, 1997 30. Number of live births by smoking status of mother and percent of 36 mothers who smoked cigarettes during pregnancy, by age and 12 Live births by Hispanic origin of mother and by race for mothers Hispanic origin of mother and by race for mothers of non- of non-Hispanic origin: United States and each State, Puerto Hispanic origin: Total of 46 reporting States. the District of Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, 1997 37 Columbia, and New York City, 1997 57 04/27/99 22:23 FAX 029 National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 47, No. 18, April 29, 1999 19 31. Number of live births, percent of mothers who smoked cigarettes 50. Live births by plurality of birth and ratios, by age and race and during pregnancy, and percent distribution of average number of Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 82 cigarettes smoked by mothers per day, according to educational attainment and race and Hispanic origin of mother: Total of 46 reporting States, the District of Columbia, and New York City, 1997 58 32. Percent low birthweight by smoking status. age, and race and Hispanic origin of mother: Total of 46 reporting States, the District of Columbia, and New York City. 1997 59 33. Live births by month of pregnancy prenatal care began and percent of mothers beginning care in the first trimester and percent with late or no care. by age and race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 60 34. Percent of mothers beginning prenatal care in the first trimester and percent of mothers with late or no prenatal care by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States and each State, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Guam, 1997 62 35. Live births by month of pregnancy prenatal care began, number of prenatal visits, and median number of visits, by race and Hispanic origin of mother. United States, 1997 63 36. Live births to mothers with selected obstetric procedures and rates by age of mother, by race of mother: United States, 1997 65 37. Live births to mothers with selected complications of labor and/or delivery and rates by age of mother, by race of mother. United States, 1997 66 38. Live births by attendant place of delivery, and race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 67 39. Live births by method of delivery and rates of cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery, by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1989-97 68 40. Live births by method of delivery, and rales of cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery, by age and race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States. 1997 69 41. Rates of cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States and each State, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Guam, 1997 70 42. Rates of cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery, by selected maternal medical risk factors and complications of labor and/or delivery: United States, 1997 71 43. Live births by birthweight and percent very low and low birthweight. by period of gestation and race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 72 44. Percent of live births very preterm and preterm and percent of live births of very low birthweight and low birthweight, by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States. 1981-97 74 45. Number and percent low birthweight and number of live births by birthweight, by age and race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1997 75 46. Number and percent of births of low birthweight by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States and each State, Puerto Rico. Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa, 1997 77 47. Number and percent of births of very low birthweight by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States and each State. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. 1997 78 48. Live births with selected abnormal conditions of the newborn and rates by age of mother, by race of mother: United States. 1997 79 49. Live births with selected congenital anomalies and rates by age of mother, by race of mother: Total of 49 reporting States and the District of Columbia, 1997 80