Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 33
JUN-22-2000 10:18 ILWU 202 467 4875 P.02/03 INTERNATIONAL 1188 FRANKLIN STREET Conghase LONGSHORE & SAN FRANCISCO WAREHOUSE UNION CALIFORNIA 94109 (415) 775-0533 AFL-CIO (415) 775-1302 FAX BRIAN McWILLIAMS JAMES SPINOSA LEONARD HOSHIJO President Vice President JOE IBARRA Vice President Secretary-Treasurer June 20, 2000 Ms. Lisa Myers Correspondent NBC News 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10112 Dear Ms. Myers: I am writing to express my complete exasperation over your biased reporting on the United States Sugar program that aired on the so-called "Fleecing of America" segment. It was an unfair attack on our nation's sugar farmers and an attack on the workers that depend on a viable sugar program. The ILWU represents the remaining 2,000 sugar workers in the state of Hawaii. These workers have union contracts that offer them decent wages and benefits as opposed to the workers of many other sugar-producing countries where people work long hours for little pay and begin work as children. Hawaii sugar workers are some of the highest paid, most productive agricultural workers in the world. Your report concentrated solely on the sugar producing companies, completely failing to consider the working people whose jobs would be destroyed if the sugar program were eliminated. I believe the American people would be interested in the fact that nationally 167,800 full-time workers are employed by the sweetener industry. The assertion in your report that the sugar program hurts consumers is not backed up by the real facts. The raw price of sugar has been at a record lows throughout the 1990's yet the cost of candy and other food products at the grocery store has gone up! Corporations are not passing the savings of low raw sugar prices to the consumers now. Why would they change their practice of keeping the windfall created when sugar prices drop if the program were eliminated? The timing of your "Fleecing of America" report is most interesting. As you probably know, Congress will soon debate the funding bill for Agriculture programs and we expect the same attacks on the sugar program during debate on the bill that we have faced year "