Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 18
create: Vietnam MEMORANDUM TO: GENE SPERLING KAREN TRAMONTANO MARA RUDMAN FROM: DANIEL ROSEN DeR DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2000 RE: VIETNAM LABOR INITIATIVES - - OPTIONS FROM SAMET Recall that Embassy Hanoi was put off at the end of last week by the outgoing request for country clearance sent by DUS Samet to visit Vietnam on Labor issues, because it exceeded purposes previously discussed. After discussions with Peterson and others clarifying, we now have oral agreement from Ambassador Peterson that Samet can go to Hanoi to discuss a labor dialogue, Embassy Hanoi would withdraw their "non-clearance". Samet needs to tell them when he is going to come, and Hanoi will resend an in-coming country clearance reflecting this. (If Samet intends to change dates he will need to send a cable indicating that Monday). Samet has provided us, at my request, a set of 3 possible outcome options for his visit, with demonstrative examples of each from past achievements with other countries. These are: 1. Labor Dialogue: A "process" is created, which makes reference to "issues related to labor markets and core labor standards," as with the "US-China Labor Dialogue" established during the 1998 US-China Summit. This could specify reciprocal visits at an appropriate level and agenda. 2. A Joint Statement: Signaling start of a process of dialogue, a joint statement could spell out issues discussed, views, programs to be pursued and future agenda, as in the case of the April 2000 Statement with India. 3. An MOU: A more formal construct for a dialogue, establishing a hard framework for process that would be discussed in each of the above, as in the case of the MOU of July 2000 between the US and Ukraine. Samet's note and texts relating to each of these options are attached. Note that in my prior memo to you on this subject I suggested the following parameters for Samet's trip: i. To inform the Vietnamese as to the full range and scope of labor issues that the US is interested in discussing with them in a joint dialogue, and illustrate the cases of other countries with which we undertake such a dialogue and the results; ii. To identify with the Vietnamese that set of labor issues on which there is a common interest in pursuing a dialogue (note that Vietnamese labor officials had previously invited Samet to discuss many topics, so there is a starting point);