Document
Telegram from Ambassador Warren Austin to Secretary of State Dean Acheson
- Part of Korean War Files (Truman Administration), Department of State Files
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 416
INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State DUPLICATE IN W. P. FILE
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
M-X
TOP SECRET
Action
Centrol: 4170
UNA
Rec'd: December 8, 1950
FROM: New York
9:33 p.m.
Info
SS
TO: Secretary of State
G
EUR
NO: DELGA 394, December 8, 8:11 p.m.
w From n.y.
NEA
FE
PRIORITY.
Delga 396,
DCR
12/9
Re Chinese Communists conversations with Rau.
Confirming Gross --Hickerson telecon this afternoon, following
is report of Gross conversation with Rau December 8.
Rau said that yesterday Chiao had asked Menon with regard
to Asiatic declaration what assurances there would be that
the UN forces would not cross the 38th parallel at some
later date. Rau asked me what our position was on that
matter. This led to a general discussion of the cease-
fire situation and our attitude toward it along the following
lines.
I said that we were not soliciting a cease-fire arrangement
of any kind, were not taking any initiative looking toward
one, and were not suggesting that anyone else take such
initiative. However, in the event that someone else entirely
on his own initiative proposed a cease-fire arrangement, we
would be prepared to consider it on its merits, provided it
contained no political conditions of any kind and provided
that in all respects it was a clearly fair and honorable
suggestion. I repeated that these comments on my part were
not intended to suggest or imply any encouragement of initia-
tive, and to stress this point I described the present mili-
tary situation as from our point of view making it possible
for us to "let nature take its course in the UN.
With regard to the specific question Rau had asked, I said
that while I had no instruction on the matter except to
listen to any comment or questions that might be raised by
others, it seemed to me that the basis of the question was
not clear. I said that, of course, looking at the matter
from a purely logical point of view, the UN forces would
respect any cease-fire line or else it would not be a
"cease-fire line. I added that the main problem was to
avoid any political implication of any kind with regard
to future settlement. This, I repeated, we were not pre-
pared to consider at the present time in connection with
any cease-fire
(over)
TOP SECRET
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
+14
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to