Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
197026195
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2DECLASSIFY
12065, Sec. 3.102
State Dept. E.O. Guidelines, March 6, 1982 OFFICE OF
OF STATE
By, DED NLT Date WASHINGTON
March 24, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INE ORMATHON
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
IRAN
The Shah, in a conversation with Ambassador Henderson, re- -
iterated his belief that he had been correct in refusing to yield
to the various pressures on him to remove Mosadeq. The Shah stated
that 11 Mosadeq and Kashani are safe only because my army is protecting
them", and that the change in Mosadeq's popularity was caused by his
promising too much and that most of the thinking people in Iran now be- -
lieved that he had no constructive program. In reply to a question re- -
garding the ability of Mosadeq to surprise his opponents by proposing a
program for Iran "1to lieft itself up by its own bootstraps" through a
series of drastic measures such as increased taxation, the curtailment
of imports and the absorption of labor in public works, the Shah replied
that he did not believe that this would be possible as Mosadeq and his
advisers were tempermentally andtechnically unable to launch a program
of this kind. Furthermore, the Shah believes that an attempt to initiate
such a program would further weaken National Front unity which depended
primarily on the expectation that Iran would meet its fiscal problems
through increased oil revenues. The Shah said that he doubted that
Mosadeq could control the new Majlis for a long period in view of the
financial situation of the country, and that although Mosadeq would have
more supporters than in the previous Majlis the opposition could no
longer be cowed and would therefore be in a position to "show where
Mosadeq could retire voluntarily or under pressure. 11 The Shah added
that he would not intervene unless it should become clear that intervention
was necessary for the safety of the country.
Regarding the continuance of the United States Military mission,
the Shah expressed appreciation of the willingness of the United States
Government to permit it to remain with merely antoral extension con-
tract" and stressed that the mission could remain for an indefinite
period. When Ambassador Henderson said that he did not believe that
the United States Government considered the present arrangement other
than temporary, the Shah replied that when a new government was formed
he hoped that the former agreement could be extended in writing for a
definite term. When the Shah expressed his concern regarding the slow
delivery of military equipment and supplies, Ambassador Henderson
explained the necessity for giving priority to areas in which actual