Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
207523115
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
17 D
SECRET
A
Action
Control: 35
EUR
Rec'd: September 1, 1951
FROM: London
2.46 a.m.
Info
SS
TO:
Secretary of State
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
G
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
L
NO: DEPTO 310, August 31, 9 pom
By
DER NTT, Date 10-12-80
SISA
NEA
DCR
SENT DEPT DEPTO 310, RPTD INFO BRUSSELS 60, COPENHAGEN 46,
FRANKFORT 150, THE HAGUE 50, HEIDELBERL 81, LISBON 23, LUXEM-
BO URG 33, OSLO 40, PARIS 479. ROME 74, REYKJAVIK 9, WIESBADEN
105. OTTAWA 22.
This is roundup of present governmental attitudes (and their
probable positions at Ottawa) on full membership, for Greece
and Turkey based on discussions with each dep within last 48
hours. Since many of them spoke very frankly personal basis
addressees, particularly Oslo, The Hague, Lisbon and Copen -
hagen, are requested protect sources. Quote them not (rpt not)
to their own FONOFF as we devoutly hope somethings we say will
not (rpt not) be quoted against us.
Italy. Consistently strong advocate.
Canada. wld have preferred separate pact but has stated, both
privately and in deps, wld agree to full membership. Will
probably help.
Belgium. states privately "fully agree" but has indicated this
only guardedly in mtgs.
UK and Fr. Support full membership and have agreed in SG to
its paper on command structure but each govt still has some
reservations from divergent points of view, on command struc- -
ture and its relationship to unconditional invitation number
being issued by council at Ottawa.
Iceland. Governmental decision taken not (rpt not) to oppose
full membership.
Luxembourg. Governmental decision not (rpt not) taken but will
be influenged by Belg objection.
Netherlands. Still opposed but will "probably yield". First
reaction to SG command paper strongly unf avorable and may press
hard that Turkey come under direct NATO command as such as
condition for agreement.
Norway. Still opposed but swill not veto" Will be influenced
by discussion at Ottawa and prior parliamentary consultations
HARRY S. TRUMAN LIBRARY
in which
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Relations
belongs_to