Ask the Scholar

Page 30 of 88
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 30

OCR

TELCON - 3 - Mr. Kissinger/Amb. Dobrynin 10:55 a. m. , August 7, 1972 K: So that you see it. We will say it has no legal force. D: Yeah. K: It is not a reservation. D: Yeah. K: And we are construing it only as a support of what has already been stated to the Soviet side by the Administration as part of the unilateral interpretation. D: Yeah. K: So it is not -- So this is where we stand now. D: Um-humm. Well, I would like to see this text of course. What you mentioned right now. But is it really so necessary what was said government to government to make it public? K: No, no; not what's been said government to government. You remember we transmitted to the Congress the unilateral interpretation? D: Yes, I remember. K: Those are the ones that are being quoted. Those are already part of the record. Nothing is being said that is not already a matter of public record. D: But in this way, how will it be? It will be in his a Jackson amendment then as a particular part of statement which was made previously or which will be in a statement separate by Administration? K: No, it will be a Jackson amendment which we will then say publicly has no legal force and merely state what is already a matter of the public record. D: Uh-huh. So you will now put it in this way, that it is not a legal force and so on, yeah? K: That is right. What we are saying -- the Jackson amendment does not constitute a reservation or interpretation to the agreement in any legal sense.

Page data

Page
30
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
660e4728fe89e797
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
498694055
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "498694055",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694055",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "July 1972-September 1972",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694055",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 88,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "498694055",
    "label": "July 1972-September 1972",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694055"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "498694055",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694055",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "July 1972-September 1972",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694055",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 88,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694055",
    "naId": 498694055,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 30,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-27-05-030.jpg",
    "mediaId": "660e4728fe89e797",
    "ocrText": "TELCON\n- 3 -\nMr. Kissinger/Amb. Dobrynin\n10:55 a. m. , August 7, 1972\nK:\nSo that you see it. We will say it has no legal force.\nD:\nYeah.\nK:\nIt is not a reservation.\nD:\nYeah.\nK:\nAnd we are construing it only as a support of what has already been\nstated to the Soviet side by the Administration as part of the unilateral\ninterpretation.\nD:\nYeah.\nK:\nSo it is not -- So this is where we stand now.\nD:\nUm-humm. Well, I would like to see this text of course. What you\nmentioned right now. But is it really so necessary what was said\ngovernment to government to make it public?\nK:\nNo, no; not what's been said government to government. You\nremember we transmitted to the Congress the unilateral interpretation?\nD:\nYes, I remember.\nK:\nThose are the ones that are being quoted. Those are already part of\nthe record. Nothing is being said that is not already a matter of public\nrecord.\nD:\nBut in this way, how will it be? It will be in his a Jackson\namendment then as a particular part of statement which was made\npreviously or which will be in a statement separate by Administration?\nK:\nNo, it will be a Jackson amendment which we will then say publicly\nhas no legal force and merely state what is already a matter of the\npublic record.\nD:\nUh-huh. So you will now put it in this way, that it is not a legal\nforce and so on, yeah?\nK:\nThat is right. What we are saying -- the Jackson amendment does\nnot constitute a reservation or interpretation to the agreement in any\nlegal sense."
}