Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
198247563
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
the
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
WASHINGTON
State Dept. Guidelines, March 9-9-85 6, 1982 5
By DEB NLT, Date
April 9, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
EGYPT
We have informed Embassy Cairo that we find the present trend
of Anglo-Egyptian conversations disturbing and see increasing
evidence that the Egyptian Government is so unsure of its position that it is
taking every opportunity to make negotiations difficult almost to the point
of impossibility. We see signs of this in the setting of the election date,
the shilly-shallying over the text of an exchange of letters, and in the
immediacy of the Government*s reaction to the Sudan draft constitution.
We feel that an early agreement with the UK would offer Egypt a better
opportunity than now exists to bring its point of view on the Sudan to pre-
vail in the Sudan itself, in the UK and elsewhere. Egypt must also come
to understand that it has no monopoly either on sentimentalism or public
opinion.
We have instructed Ambassador Caffery to take every occasion
to emphasize to the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister that we are
deeply interested in the Anglo-Egyptian conversations and hope that Egypt
will do everything in its power to bring these negotiations to a successful
conclusion. Caffery is also to say that we should greatly deplore Egypt's
breaking off the talks which have commenced; that we are convinced that
the UK is not only sincerely desirous of discussing all outstanding issues
with a view to their early solution, but has also made strenuous efforts
to meet the Egyptian position; and that Egypt must accept the fact that
negotiations are a two-way affair and that their present attitude toward the
British is not conducive to a settlement.
IRAN
The British Foreign Office gave Embassy London the following
information yesterday concerning its present attitude toward the
Iranian situation. 1) The Foreign Office is more convinced than ever of
the improbability of reaching a satisfactory agreement with Mosadeq on
the oil question, whether through the International Bank or through direct
negotiations, whether on an interim or a long-term basis. 2) The Foreign
Office is disposed to sit tight and see whether a change in government takes
place in Iran. Meanwhile, in the unlikely event that Mosadeq shows a
genuine willingness to be forth-coming, the UK would delve into the matter
again. 3) Mr. Garner of the International Bank seems optimistic over a
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION