Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
202444135
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT (Naval Aide) 122
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
the
DECLASSIFIED
WASHINGTON
7
Dept. E.O. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
12065, Sec. 3-402
November 22, 1950
State By DEB NLT, Date 6-12-85 TOPSECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
KOREA
In view of the possibility that Jebb, UK delegate to
the UN, may be instructed to present to the Security
Council UK proposals for a demilitarized zone in northern Korea, we
have instructed our Charge in London to see Foreign Minister Bevin
immediately and to urge upon him in the strongest terms our belief that
it would be most harmful for Jebb to put forward the UK proposal in the
immediate future. Our reasons for opposing this action are: 1) with
the offensive about to start in Korea, it would be most confusing to
General MacArthur and his forces; 2) before the Chinese Communist
representatives have arrived in New York and their attitude explored,
such a proposal would constitute a commitment which they mightregard
as a starting point for bargaining for something more; 3) that the terms
of the proposal would present grave military problems and dangers
which have not been explored adequately; and 4) until the results of the
forthcoming offensive in Korea are known, it is impossible to ascertain
what course safely can and should be adopted. Since we would be
compelled to oppose such proposals if made, we hope that we can avoid
a disclosure of US-UK divergence in this matter and that Bevin will not
proceed with this proposal pending further US-UK consultations.
NEPAL
We have instructed Ambassador Henderson to
present to Indian Prime Minister Nehru our strong
views that the Government of India should refrain from embarking on
politico-military intervention in Nepal but should continue to explore
peaceful means of solving the situation presented by the flight of the
King of Nepal and the subsequent designation of the King's young son as
successor to the throne by the prevailing Nepalese Government. These
instructions, reinforcing the repeated urging for the exercise of
restraint by the Indian Government on the part of Ambassador Henderson
and the UK High Commissioner in India, followed closely upon the
expressed intent of the Indian Government to recognize the old King and
an apparent intent to give him political and military support in the
contest for head of the Nepalese state. In the meantime, the UK High
Commissioner has requested that he be instructed to ask Nehru to
TOP SECRET