Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
174679365
label
Newspaper Article, Two Term Curb Plan Finds the Going Hard
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
174679365
contentType
document
title
Newspaper Article, Two Term Curb Plan Finds the Going Hard
collections
Records of the National Committee Against Limiting the Presidency
Subject Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
174679365
levelOfDescription
item
productionDates
day
22
logicalDate
1951-01-22
month
1
year
1951
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
photo
mediaId
d6975183c530478b
ocrText
TWO-TERM CURB PLAN FINDS THE GOING HARD WASHINGTON, Jan. 22 (UP)- The proposal to limit a President to two terms is finding different gooing in State Leigslatures. Only twenty-five states have ratified the proposed Constitu- tional amendment since it was passed by Congress almost four years ago. Eleven more ratifica- tions are needed before it becomes effective. If the additional ratifi- cations have not been voted by 1954, the proposal will be dead. The twenty-five states that have ratified the proposal are Maine Michigan, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, Delaware, Illinois Oregon, Colorado, California, New Jersey, Vermont, Ohio, Wisconsin Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Mis- souri, Nebraska, Virginia, Missis- sippi, New York, South Dakota North Dakota, Louisiana and In- diana. Arkansas is the only state that has voted it down. The eleven ratifications still needed therefore must come, if at all, from the Legislatures of Ala- bama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Mas sachusetts, Minnesota, Montana Nevada, New Mexico, North Caro lina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. The best chance for ratification this year are in Georgia, expected to act this week, Idaho and Wyom- ing. Montana's Republican Legis- lature also may approve the pro- posal. The outlook in the rest of the states is uncertain or against ratification. Even if the amendment should be ratified before the next Presi- dential election, which seems un- likely, it will not affect President Truman. Congress specifically ex- empted the present occupant of the White House. 1951