Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
82577569
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2(COPY)
March 21, 1952
Dear Mr. Neustadt:
I should like to make the following comments on
the latest draft of the proposed message from the President
to the Congress on special immigration:
1. As you know, we have consistently emphasized
the importance of avoiding the impression that the migration
program is to be undertaken because of a need for workers which
must be met by migration. In this respect, the first full
paragraph on page 13 of the draft is not entirely clear. If the
implication of this paragraph is that there is a manpower
emergency in the United States which would require importation,
we would have to call attention to the fact that there is not,
at the present time, an "emergency" in this regard which would
require such importation.
2. With respect to the question raised in Assistant
Secretary of State Hickerson's memorandum regarding the numbers
and span of years over which immigration is to be permitted, it
is our judgment that the proposal contained in the draft message
is the preferable one.
3. With respect to the proposals for the training
and education of refugees, as I indicated in my letter of March 13
in comments on Part II of Title II of the proposed draft bill,
we have not had an opportunity to review the implications of
these proposals.
Yours very truly,
Secretary of Labor
REN note on paragraph one - substitution of the phrase "capacity
to absorb manpower" for "needs for manpower" would avoid any
"implication. "
and AND for
Terms
Subject
Emigration and immigration law
Relations
belongs_to